EUVC

EUVC is your go-to podcast for everything European VC. Co-hosted by Andreas Munk Holm and David Cruz e Silva, EUVC features some of the most prominent people from the European VC industry, giving you a fresh new perspective on the industry and geo we love. Follow us and stay in the loop with everything European VC on eu.vc

  1. E704 | This Week in European Tech with Dan Bowyer, Mads Jensen & Lomax Ward

    20 ГОД ТОМУ

    E704 | This Week in European Tech with Dan Bowyer, Mads Jensen & Lomax Ward

    Welcome back to another episode of Upside where Dan Bowyer, Mads Jensen of SuperSeed, and Lomax Ward of Outsized Ventures go behind the headlines shaping European tech, capital, and power.This week felt less like a market update and more like a structural reset.Nvidia posts another blowout quarter — and the market barely reacts.Ukraine, four years into war, is quietly becoming Europe’s most important defence innovation engine.Anthropic adjusts its safety posture as AI labs collide with geopolitics and procurement reality.And beneath it all, questions around margins, sovereignty, and capital allocation are getting sharper.This isn’t just a tech cycle.It feels like a systems cycle.This is Upside, where optimism is earned, not assumed.What’s covered:03:30 Nvidia earnings: perfection priced in?09:40 Ukraine four years on: from aid recipient to defence capability supplier17:30 Europe’s defence spend: real budgets or slow procurement?23:30 AI safety becomes conditional: competitive pressure meets ethics31:00 Distillation at scale: China, IP leakage, and national security35:00 SaaSpocalypse vs SaaS redemption: systems of record vs systems of action40:30 OpenAI & Anthropic margins: the hidden constraint under the hype46:00 Chips & quantum: Europe’s deep tech wedge — if scale capital shows up54:30 Abundant intelligence: what breaks if intelligence gets cheap?#euvc #VC #VentureCapital #Investing #TheEuropeanVC #Podcast #Tech #Startup

    59 хв
  2. E703 | Max Bray and Juliet Bailin, Kindred Capital VC: LP Conviction, $15B Funds & The Venture Barbell

    3 ДН. ТОМУ

    E703 | Max Bray and Juliet Bailin, Kindred Capital VC: LP Conviction, $15B Funds & The Venture Barbell

    What exactly are LPs buying when they allocate to venture today and do they still believe in it? In this episode, Andreas sits down with Max Bray and Juliet Bailin, both Venture Partners at Kindred Capital VC to unpack what’s really happening beneath the fundraising headlines. Max brings the raw perspective of trying to raise a first-time fund in 2025 with unicorn-founder GPs, strong angel track records, and still struggling to secure second meetings. Juliet brings the sharper counterpoint: LP frustration isn’t always ignorance. Sometimes it’s a rational response to how venture has been practiced, especially around transparency, liquidity discipline, and the unrealistic expectation that a GP should be world-class at everything. This is a conversation about: LP behavior in uncertain cycles The myth of the “full-stack investor” Why solo GP economics are brutal Whether software still needs venture And why the fund model is splitting at the extremes Not hot takes. Not doom. Just honest mechanics. Share What’s Covered: 01:04 Max’s 2025 fundraising reality: even strong “on-paper” stories struggle to get second calls 03:46 LP rotation: capital moving toward liquidity, security, and shorter-duration bets 05:08 LP frustration: transparency gaps + liquidity decision-making 07:09 LPACs as sparring partners, not governance theatre 09:31 Europe’s structural issue: too few LPs and GPs have lived full cycles 12:47 The “full-stack investor” myth: investing + fund management + compliance + IR 14:46 Solo GP economics: why 2/20 breaks at the small end 26:08 The barbell thesis: platforms on one end, specialists on the other 27:56 Software defensibility compression in the AI era 30:24 Will AI decentralize outcomes — or centralize them further? 33:10 The rise of AI roll-ups and alternative capital models 35:19 The “middle-market squeeze” — real or overhyped? 39:34 What founders actually care about when choosing a fund

    37 хв
  3. E702 | Lubomila Jordanova, Plan A: Climate Isn’t “Over”

    5 ДН. ТОМУ

    E702 | Lubomila Jordanova, Plan A: Climate Isn’t “Over”

    Climate isn’t “over.” But building in climate has entered a new chapter, defined by shifting regulation, politicized narratives, buyer confusion, and a market that funded dozens of overlapping platforms. In this episode, Andreas and co-host Carmel Rafaeli, Founding Partner at The Table, sit down with Lubomila Jordanova, Co-founder & CEO of Plan A, just weeks after Plan Ajoined forces with Diginex, the NASDAQ-listed sustainability technology company, at the end of 2025. The conversation is part of Leaders Shaping a Resilient Planet, a series spotlighting exceptional founders in climate tech who happen to be women. The focus is not identity as a theme, but execution as a discipline. These are operators building in some of the most complex and capital-intensive parts of the real economy. This is not an acquisition recap. It is a clear-eyed discussion about what it takes to build and responsibly exit a climate tech company in a market that is maturing quickly. What’s covered: 00:52 The Table: co-investing community + the Foundation’s recoverable grants model 02:05 Introducing Lubomila Jordanova and Plan A 02:45 The acquisition: why Plan A chose to lead consolidation 04:35 Fundraising logic → acquisition logic: what changed 06:40 Founder outcome vs VC outcome: how alignment works in an exit 11:30 “The truth is where the real economy sits”: what carbon software actually sells 13:30 The uncomfortable line: “glorified consulting with a digital angle” 15:05 What VC portfolios get wrong in climate: return distribution, capital stack, secondaries 16:55 Why “climate” can’t be one bucket: hardware vs SaaS vs reporting 20:00 Managing investor perception: visibility, bias, and boardroom baggage 23:15 The broader financial pyramid: VC vs public markets vs real-economy signals 27:35 Post-exit reality: why a public-company KPI lens changes the conversation 31:10 Three founder learnings (humility, ecosystem, real-world problems) 33:55 A rare founder truth: pregnancy during the exit + building with “more hats than one”

    35 хв
  4. E701 | Andy Lurling, Lumo Labs: Smart Capital from Eindhoven and Investing in AI for Health

    6 ДН. ТОМУ

    E701 | Andy Lurling, Lumo Labs: Smart Capital from Eindhoven and Investing in AI for Health

    In a market where “AI fund” can mean almost anything, Lumo Labs is unusually specific: digital deep tech, deployed early, and anchored in one of Europe’s densest innovation clusters—Eindhoven, home of Philips’ legacy and the High Tech Campus (“smartest square kilometer” energy). In this EUVC pitch episode, Andreas sits down with Andy Lurling, founder & GP of Lumo Labs, to unpack how an entrepreneur-turned-investor built a fund that’s deliberately more than money: a structured support program, deep technical selection, and a thesis shaped by real-world constraints, health systems under pressure, and cities as the source of most emissions and pollution. Share What’s covered: 00:59 Why “Labs” and why Eindhoven: origin story + Philips legacy 02:31 Andy’s founder journey: EyeOpener, ESA as first investor, and the exit 06:15 From angel tickets to a fund: two cornerstone LPs pull them into fund building 08:26 Fund I recap: €20m, 23 pre-seed/seed investments 08:58 Fund II status: just over €40m raised, targeting €100m final size 10:34 The actual thesis: AI + digital deep tech (security, IoT, AR) 13:12 SDG focus: health, education, sustainable cities + climate action (urban) 15:31 Why these sectors: prevention over curing, and cities as the “source problem” 19:22 Where they invest: Netherlands/Belgium/Germany core; Spain/Portugal + Nordics via scouts 20:30 “Smart capital” in practice: leadership, market fit, storytelling, follow-on readiness 23:30 Track record snapshot: 30 companies; 3 dead; 9 (soon 11) moving into scale-up territory

    22 хв
  5. E700 | This Week in European Tech with Dan Bowyer, Lomax Ward & Eyal Malinger

    23 ЛЮТ.

    E700 | This Week in European Tech with Dan Bowyer, Lomax Ward & Eyal Malinger

    Welcome back to another episode of Upside where Dan Bowyer and Mads Jensen of SuperSeed go behind the headlines shaping European tech, capital, and power. This week we’re joined by Eyal Malinger, co-founder of Resurge Growth Partners, to unpack a genuinely strange week in global tech. China unveils humanoid robots that look disturbingly battlefield-ready. Anthropic tries to draw moral lines in defence AI. Peter Steinberger leaves Europe almost as fast as he went viral. Munich becomes less “security conference” and more “Europe, wake up.” And in the background, billion-dollar AI seed rounds and quantum mega-funds quietly signal that the frontier is accelerating again. This isn’t just a tech cycle. It feels like a systems cycle. This is Upside, where optimism is earned, not assumed. What’s covered: 02:10 China’s humanoid robot moment: hardware dominance meets AI brains 06:20 Battlefield AI and the ethics problem Anthropic can’t avoid 14:00 Raspberry Pi, edge AI, and Europe’s accidental meme stock 20:30 Anthropic vs Palantir: moral lines vs deterrence logic 25:10 Peter Steinberger leaves Europe — ecosystem gravity in action 31:00 AI inside venture: workflow automation vs real alpha 43:00 Munich Security Conference: defence budgets, sovereignty, and Stark vs Thiel 52:10 Psychedelics and glucose monitors: Europe’s quiet biotech strength 55:30 Quantum funds and Europe’s billion-dollar AI seed round

    54 хв
  6. 20 ЛЮТ.

    EUVC Live at GoWest | The Outlook for European Capital Sovereignty feat. Olivier Tonneau, Jeppe Høier, Paolo Pio, Fergus Bell and Prashant Agarwal

    In this EUVC Live at GoWest episode, Olivier Tonneau, Founding Partner Quantonation, Jeppe Høier, Co-Host at EUVC Corporate, Paolo Pio, Co-founder and General Partner at Exceptional Ventures, Fergus Bell, Founder and Managing Partner at The Players Fund, and Prashant Agarwal, Chairman and Managing Director at Scandian xplore one defining question: How does Europe turn frontier innovation into global scale? Across quantum, corporate capital, longevity, and sport, the same pattern emerges: Europe doesn’t lack talent or research. It lacks the capital and market architecture required to scale strategic industries fast enough to stay independent. Olivier opens with Europe’s quantum paradox. Europe supplies a meaningful share of deployed quantum computers globally, with strong startup and research clusters across the Nordics, France, Germany, and the UK. The science is world-class — but the financing is breaking. Over the last 12 months, the funding ratio between Europe and the US has shifted from roughly 1:2 to nearly 1:7, accelerating US scale-up, public listings, and acquisition pressure. Europe has 12–24 months to respond — not to avoid failure, but to avoid becoming the lab while others become the market. Jeppe shifts the lens to corporates. Corporate venture capital represents roughly 25% of global VC volume, yet the average lifespan of a CVC unit is only 3.7 years. His argument is blunt: most corporates launch venture arms believing they are “doing VC,” when they are actually building a strategic instrument without the operating system required to sustain it. Without durable governance — and a clear Build, Buy, Partner model — corporate venture becomes fragile instead of strategic. Paolo reframes health and longevity as deep tech moving at software speed. Genome sequencing has collapsed from decades to hours. mRNA proved that biology timelines can compress dramatically. With AI now embedded in diagnostics and discovery, health is entering an exponential era — and venture is being pulled with it. The session closes with a thesis most investors still underestimate. Fergus and Prashant argue sport is no longer entertainment — it is venture infrastructure. Athletes and rights holders are becoming capital allocators and distribution rails. Elite sport has evolved into a real-world deployment environment for deep tech, health tech, AI, and performance systems — where validation happens under pressure and at global scale. The takeaway across all five perspectives is clear: Europe invents early. But scale requires architecture. Late-stage capital depth. Liquidity. Corporate integration. Coordination. What’s covered: 00:30 Europe’s scale question — five lenses on one problem 02:00 Quantum’s paradox — Europe leads in science, not in financing 05:00 The 1:7 funding gap — why the next 12–24 months matter 07:00 What Europe can do — capital architecture, procurement, scale funds 11:30 Corporate venture — 25% of global VC, but structurally fragile 13:30 Why CVCs fail — the 3-year vs 6-year test and governance gaps 16:30 Longevity as deep tech — health moving at software speed 21:30 AI in health — diagnostics, discovery, and exponential biology 27:30 Sport as venture infrastructure — athletes and rights holders as rails 34:30 Deep tech in sport — validation, performance systems, adoption under pressure 40:00 Final takeaway — Europe has innovation; it needs scale architecture

    43 хв
  7. 19 ЛЮТ.

    EUVC Live at GoWest | Europe Wants Defence Tech Without Saying “Defence”: Karl-Christian Agerup, NATO Innovation Fund & Nicholas Nelson, Archangel Ventures & Sebastian von Ribbentrop, Join Capital

    Is Europe’s defense investment wave real, or is it simply venture capital wrapped in a Ukrainian flag? The debate featured Nicholas Nelson, General Partner at Archangel Ventures, and Sebastian von Ribbentrop, Founding Partner at Join Capital. At stake is more than narrative. It is about capability, returns, sovereignty — and the structural future of European capital markets. Until recently, defense investing in Europe was controversial. Many institutional LPs avoided the sector. ESG mandates were interpreted narrowly. Defense was often softened under the label “dual-use.” Russia’s invasion of Ukraine changed the landscape. Defense budgets rose. Political rhetoric shifted. Venture capital began flowing into the sector at unprecedented levels. But the central question remains: Is this a structural capital reallocation — or a short-term momentum trade? The debate crystallizes around one fault line: defense-first vs dual-use. Nicholas argues Europe’s hesitation to embrace defense-first investing is both strategically and financially misguided. Defense-only startups, he contends, have historically outperformed. Dual-use often dilutes focus by forcing two distinct go-to-market motions. Real capability requires designing directly for the warfighter — not adapting commercial products later. In his view, dual-use in Europe often functions as a reputational hedge rather than a strategy. Sebastian counters that dual-use is not compromise — it is risk management. Advanced technologies can serve both industrial and defense customers without duplicating entire teams. Diversified revenue reduces concentration risk. Non-dilutive defense contracts can substitute late-stage equity rounds in a region where growth capital remains thin. And Europe’s comparative advantage may lie less in building vertically integrated primes — and more in dominating high-precision subsystems. As the conversation escalates, it moves beyond product strategy into a deeper structural issue: scale capital. Even where early-stage defense investment has improved, later-stage funding remains limited. Several leading European defense startups have relied heavily on US or Middle Eastern growth capital. Which raises uncomfortable questions: Can Europe build independent defense champions without foreign growth capital? Will its strongest companies inevitably “pick a flag” as they scale? Is fragmentation across 30+ procurement regimes Europe’s structural disadvantage? Without coordination at scale, even strong early-stage ecosystems struggle to produce global champions. What’s covered: 00:30 Framing the question — structural shift or narrative trade? 02:00 From taboo to trend — ESG optics and the Ukraine inflection point 04:15 Defense-first vs dual-use — the core strategic divide 07:30 The defense-first case — focus, procurement alignment, and capability building 11:00 The dual-use counterargument — diversification and risk management 14:30 Subsystems vs primes — where Europe’s advantage may lie 18:00 The growth capital gap — reliance on US and Middle Eastern funding 21:00 “Picking a flag” — sovereignty vs scale 23:30 Procurement fragmentation — 30+ regimes and scaling friction 26:00 Final takeaway — Europe’s defense future depends on capital conviction and coordination

    24 хв
  8. 18 ЛЮТ.

    EUVC Live at GoWest | The New European Sovereignty Stack: Energy, Minerals, Compute feat. Danijel Višević, Heidi Lindvall, Narina Mnatsakanian, Dr. Isabella Fandrych & Moritz Jungman

    Europe is not facing a crisis of ideas — it is facing a crisis of industrial depth. In this EUVC episode, Danijel Višević (Co-Founder & General Partner, World Fund), Heidi Lindvall (Founder & General Partner, Pale Blue Dot), Narina Mnatsakanian (Partner & Chief Impact Officer at Regeneration VC), Dr. Isabella Fandrych (Co-Founder and General Partner at Nucleus Capital), and Moritz Jungmann (GP at Future Energy Ventures) confront one of the defining questions of 2025: What does sovereignty actually mean? Danijel opens with history. In 1951, coal and steel powered conflict — so Europe integrated them. That integration was not symbolic. It was structural coordination under pressure. Europe repeated this reflex after the Berlin Wall, during COVID, and following the Russian gas shock. Europe does not collapse under pressure. It coordinates. But today, coordination must extend beyond policy — into capital markets and industrial systems. The structural gaps are stark. Europe produces less than 10% of the semiconductors it consumes. It imports the vast majority of rare earth materials. It raises significantly less venture capital than the United States. Only a fraction of European climate tech startups reach Series B. Europe can invent. It struggles to industrialize. Heidi reframes venture capital itself. Performance is necessary, but insufficient. Her equation is clear: Success = Performance × Trust. Trust — expressed through brand, values, and measurable impact — acts as a multiplier. Venture does not simply fund companies. It allocates the future. Narina reinforces the LP perspective: pension funds seek returns, but pensioners also seek stability, sustainability, and systemic resilience. Capital allocation is no longer purely financial. It is strategic. Dr. Isabella Fandrych shifts the conversation to materials. The energy transition is not just about electrons — it is about minerals: copper, lithium, nickel, manganese. Extraction today is geopolitically concentrated and environmentally destructive. Biology offers alternatives: microbes separating metals from rock, engineered proteins extracting minerals from waste streams, plants accumulating metals for harvest. Industrial decarbonisation is chemistry as much as energy policy. Jordan makes the case for baseload energy. Europe has reduced emissions partly through deindustrialization and outsourcing production. If Europe wants manufacturing, AI data centres, electrified transport, and economic resilience, it needs dense, dispatchable power. Renewables are essential — but intermittent. Nuclear remains one of the few proven zero-carbon baseload sources operating at scale. The debate, he argues, should be practical — not ideological. Moritz closes on infrastructure. Europe has built renewable capacity quickly. The constraint is no longer generation. It is grid orchestration. As energy systems decentralize, operators must manage volatile, distributed flows. The opportunity lies in software: orchestration, optimization, dynamic throughput management. Energy sovereignty is not just about producing electrons. It is about system design. Sovereignty in 2025 is not a slogan. It is an investment strategy. What’s covered: 00:30 Sovereignty redefined — from symbols to supply chains03:00 Europe under pressure — integration as a structural reflex06:00 The industrial gap — semiconductors, rare earths, and scale-up capital10:30 Venture as allocator — Success = Performance × Trust15:00 The LP lens — systemic capital and long-term responsibility19:00 The materials bottleneck — why decarbonisation is mineral-intensive23:00 Biology as infrastructure — new extraction paradigms27:00 Baseload power — nuclear as industrial policy32:00 The grid constraint — orchestration, optimization, software-defined systems38:00 Sovereignty as coordinated capital and industrial depth

    43 хв

Опис

EUVC is your go-to podcast for everything European VC. Co-hosted by Andreas Munk Holm and David Cruz e Silva, EUVC features some of the most prominent people from the European VC industry, giving you a fresh new perspective on the industry and geo we love. Follow us and stay in the loop with everything European VC on eu.vc

Більше від каналу «EUVC»

Теж може цікавити