Bridging Divides

•

Kanal • 2 program

Samhällsvetenskap

Samhällsvetenskap

Varannan månad
Vetenskap

Vetenskap

Varje dag

2024-01-17

30. The History of Outrage TV - Robert Thompson

Selling Fury: How Television Turned Outrage into a Commodity In this episode, we heard from Professor Robert Thompson about the history of television and its impact on our society. They discuss the evolution of news media, from the golden age of TV to the rise of trash TV and reality shows. They also explore the current state of news commentary and the role it plays in fueling outrage and division. Professor Thompson provides insights into the incentives that drive media companies and the challenges of finding common ground in a fragmented media landscape. Text me your feedback and leave your contact info if you'd like a reply (this is a one-way text). Thanks, David Support the show Show Notes: https://outrageoverload.net/ Contact me, David Beckemeyer by email outrageoverload@gmail.com. Follow the show on Instagram @OutrageOverload. We are also on Facebook /OutrageOverload. Check out our Subtstack https://outrageoverload.substack.com HOTLINE: 925-552-7885 Got a Question, comment or just thoughts you'd like to share? Call the O2 hotline and leave a message and you could be featured in an upcoming episode If you would like to help the show, you can contribute here. Tell everyone you know about the show. That’s the best way to support it. Rate and Review the show on Podchaser: https://www.podchaser.com/OutrageOverload Also check out our companion podcasts, This Week in Outrage and Outrage Science Bites. Intro music and outro music by Michael Ramir C. Many thanks to my co-editor and co-director, Austin Chen. Outrage Overload, a Conners Institute podcast, is part of The Democr...
2025-11-29

Dialogue vs. Discourse: Understanding the Difference - NaPodPoMo 2025 Day 29

Day 29 of our 30-day challenge, bringing us near the conclusion of our deep dive into bridging our divides. We’ve talked a lot about connection, listening, and disagreement—but there’s a subtle distinction that can make or break your efforts: the difference between dialogue and discourse. In the context of bridging, these words aren’t interchangeable. Dialogue is a cooperative exchange aimed at understanding, while discourse can often be adversarial, aiming to persuade or argue. Recognizing which approach you’re in — and which is appropriate — is key to successful connection across differences. Today’s audience question: How do dialogue and discourse differ in the bridging context — and why does that distinction matter? Answering that is Tania Israel, Professor of Counseling Psychology at UC Santa Barbara and award-winning author of Beyond Your Bubble: How to Connect Across the Political Divide. Tania breaks down how to identify and intentionally use dialogue to foster understanding, even with those you strongly disagree with. Learn more: OutrageOverload.net Join the movement to lower the temperature: Count Me In for Calm Get full access to Outrage Overload Newsletter at outrageoverload.substack.com/subscribe
2025-11-20

The Enemy We Imagine - NaPodPoMo 2025 Day 20

Day 20 of our 30-day challenge, where we’re answering the most urgent questions about bridging our divides — gathered from people across the country at the Bridging Movement Summit. We’ve talked a lot about the forces pushing us apart — outrage media, polarization, power dynamics. But today, we’re zeroing in on a hidden driver that often goes unnoticed: Our assumptions about each other. Research shows that we tend to believe the “other side” hates us more than they actually do — and those exaggerated negative perceptions can do real damage. They lead us to disengage, distrust, and reject the possibility of common ground before the conversation even begins. So today’s question: How do overly negative perceptions of political rivals break down the work of bridging — both personally and across society? To help us unpack that, we’re joined by James Coan from More Like Us, a project dedicated to revealing the true — and often surprising — beliefs that Americans hold about one another. Learn more: OutrageOverload.net Join the movement to lower the temperature: Count Me In for Calm Get full access to Outrage Overload Newsletter at outrageoverload.substack.com/subscribe
2023-11-19

NaPodPoMo Day 19: Decoding the Paradox of Contradictory Conspiracy Theories

In this episode, we explore the perplexing phenomenon of individuals holding multiple contradictory conspiracy theories simultaneously. We delve into the psychology behind this paradox, examining the underlying motivations and psychological factors that drive such beliefs. Key Points: * The ability to simultaneously believe in contradictory conspiracy theories is a real and observable phenomenon. * Several psychological factors contribute to this phenomenon, including a general distrust of authority figures, a belief that there is always more to the story than what we're told, a need for cognitive closure, a desire to feel unique and special, and a need to feel like one has control over their lives. * Believing in contradictory conspiracy theories can have negative consequences, such as distrust in media and other sources, engagement in negative political behaviors, and even support for violence and extremism. Call to Action: * Join us in our ongoing exploration of the psychology of conspiracy theories by subscribing to our podcast and leaving us your thoughts and comments. * Share this episode with others who might be interested in understanding the complex world of conspiracy theories. * Let us know if you have any questions or requests for future episodes. Get full access to Outrage Overload Newsletter at outrageoverload.substack.com/subscribe
2024-11-28

Turning Down the Temperature - NaPodPoMo 2024 - Day 28

In this Thanksgiving episode of Outrage Science Bites, host David Beckemeyer emphasizes the importance of reducing outrage and fostering healthier conversations. The episode challenges the notion that the problem lies solely with the "other side," urging listeners to reflect on their own role in fueling outrage. It highlights the dangers of certainty and demonization, advocating for understanding and empathy towards those with differing viewpoints. The episode offers practical steps for reducing outrage, such as questioning our own assumptions, managing emotional triggers, and engaging in good faith conversations. By acknowledging our shared responsibility in combating outrage, we can create a more positive and understanding environment, even amidst disagreements. The episode concludes with a Thanksgiving message, emphasizing the power of connection, gratitude, and understanding in bridging divides. Additional Resources: * Outrage Overload podcast Get full access to Outrage Overload Newsletter at outrageoverload.substack.com/subscribe
2024-11-13

The Blind Spot: Why We Think We Have a Monopoly on the Facts - NaPodPoMo 2024 - Day 13

This episode of Outrage Science Bites explores the psychology of polarization, focusing on the concept of the "blind spot" - our tendency to believe we have a monopoly on facts. The episode features insights from Åsa Wikforss, who discusses the phenomenon of "knowledge resistance," which explains our inclination to resist new knowledge that contradicts our existing beliefs. This resistance is driven by psychological mechanisms like confirmation bias and motivated reasoning, where we selectively seek information that confirms our views and employ reasoning to defend our cherished beliefs. The episode emphasizes that knowledge resistance is not a character flaw but a common human tendency. Additionally, David McRaney's perspective highlights the limitations of using facts alone to change someone's mind, as beliefs are often intertwined with personal values and identities. The key takeaway is that overcoming polarization requires moving beyond a "win-lose" mentality in debates and fostering understanding by recognizing the underlying motivations and values that shape our perspectives. Additional Resources: * Outrage Overload podcast Get full access to Outrage Overload Newsletter at outrageoverload.substack.com/subscribe
2025-11-14

Bridging Across Power Differences (Part 2) - NaPodPoMo 2025 Day 14

Day 14 of our 30-day challenge—our ongoing exploration into the science and practice of bridging divides. On Day 11, we spoke with Kira Hamman about one of the toughest challenges in bridging—how to build long bridges across vast differences in social, political, or economic power.Today, we revisit that essential question from another perspective. How do you account for differential power dynamics in dialogue along the long bridges? Our guest, Tania Israel, professor of counseling psychology and award-winning author, joins us to share how she approaches this problem.Tania brings insight into what it means to create genuine connection in spaces where imbalances exist—where listening, empathy, and structure can turn uneven ground into shared understanding. Learn more: OutrageOverload.net Join the movement to lower the temperature: Count Me In for Calm Get full access to Outrage Overload Newsletter at outrageoverload.substack.com/subscribe
2023-11-30

NaPodPoMo Day 30: Finding Calm Amidst the Chaos

Winding down the NaPodPoMo 30-day challenge with some practical guidance from personal experience and learnings from the experts I’ve had on the Outrage Overload podcast. Check out all 30 episodes of the Outrage Science Bytes podcast. Visit outrageoverload.net or click here to leave feedback for me. Get full access to Outrage Overload Newsletter at outrageoverload.substack.com/subscribe
2023-11-17

NaPodPoMo Day 17: The Anchoring Effect

In this episode of Outrage Science Bites, we look at another cognitive bias, exploring the pervasive phenomenon known as the anchoring effect. This bias, often employed in outrage media, can subtly influence our political judgments and decisions, fueling affective polarization. What is the Anchoring Effect? The anchoring effect refers to the tendency to rely heavily on the first piece of information we encounter, particularly if it involves numbers. This initial information, or "anchor," can shape our subsequent judgments and decisions, even if it is irrelevant or misleading. Anchoring in Outrage Media: Outrage media, characterized by emotionally charged and attention-grabbing content, often exploits the anchoring effect to manipulate public opinion. By presenting shocking statistics or inflammatory headlines, they set an anchor that can influence how we perceive subsequent information. Consequences of Anchoring in the Political Realm: The anchoring effect can have significant consequences in the political realm, contributing to: * Entrenched Opposing Viewpoints: Anchoring can reinforce existing beliefs, making it difficult to consider alternative perspectives and compromise. * Confirmation Bias: Anchoring aligns with confirmation bias, leading individuals to seek out information that confirms their anchored perceptions while disregarding contradictory evidence. * Echo Chambers: Anchoring can contribute to echo chambers, where individuals are surrounded by information that reinforces their anchored beliefs, further isolating them from opposing viewpoints. Combating Anchoring Bias: To counteract the influence of anchoring, we can cultivate a culture of critical thinking and media literacy: * Question the Source and Credibility of Information: Critically evaluate the source of information, considering its biases and potential motivations. * Seek Diverse Perspectives: Expose yourself to a variety of viewpoints, including those that challenge your anchored beliefs. * Be Mindful of Emotional Impact: Recognize that strong emotions can cloud judgment and make you more susceptible to anchoring. * Hold Media Outlets Accountable: Support ethical journalism practices and encourage transparency in information presentation. Promoting Media Literacy Education: Media literacy education plays a crucial role in equipping individuals with the skills to recognize and resist anchoring effects: * Teach Critical Thinking Skills: Empower individuals to analyze information objectively and identify logical fallacies. * Deconstruct Media Messages: Help individuals understand how media techniques, such as framing and agenda-setting, can influence perceptions. * Promote Fact-Checking and Source Evaluation: Encourage the use of reliable sources and independent verification of information. Conclusion: The anchoring effect is a subtle yet powerful force that can shape our political judgments and decisions. By cultivating critical thinking, media literacy, and ethical media practices, we can better resist the influence of anchoring bias and make more informed and objective decisions. Resources: * Outrage Overload Podcast: https://outrageoverload.net/ * Connors Institute Trustworthy News Guide: https://connorsinstitute.org/ Get full access to Outrage Overload Newsletter at outrageoverload.substack.com/subscribe
2024-11-23

Outrage and Mental Health - NaPodPoMo 2024 - Day 23

This episode of Outrage Science Bites explores the heavy toll that constant outrage takes on mental health, both individually and societally. Individually, outrage-driven content triggers a fight-or-flight response, leading to chronic stress, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, and physical health problems. It also erodes empathy and fuels tribalism. On a societal level, outrage weakens social cohesion, decreases trust in institutions, and creates toxic political discourse. The effects are seen in rising rates of anxiety and depression, particularly among young people. The episode emphasizes the need for awareness, suggesting strategies like setting boundaries, practicing digital detoxes, and choosing media sources wisely. It calls for broader social solutions such as investing in mental health resources, promoting media literacy, and encouraging open dialogue. The episode concludes by highlighting the possibility of a healthier, more connected world where outrage doesn't define us. Additional Resources: * Outrage Overload podcast Get full access to Outrage Overload Newsletter at outrageoverload.substack.com/subscribe

Feeling overwhelmed by toxic news cycles and political conflict? Bridging Divides offers a better way. Our shows help you stay informed without the outrage, understand the forces pulling us apart, and discover practical ways to stay engaged—without losing your mind.

Webbplats

Bridging Divides

Topprogram

30. The History of Outrage TV - Robert Thompson

Dialogue vs. Discourse: Understanding the Difference - NaPodPoMo 2025 Day 29

The Enemy We Imagine - NaPodPoMo 2025 Day 20

NaPodPoMo Day 19: Decoding the Paradox of Contradictory Conspiracy Theories

Turning Down the Temperature - NaPodPoMo 2024 - Day 28

The Blind Spot: Why We Think We Have a Monopoly on the Facts - NaPodPoMo 2024 - Day 13

Bridging Across Power Differences (Part 2) - NaPodPoMo 2025 Day 14

NaPodPoMo Day 30: Finding Calm Amidst the Chaos

NaPodPoMo Day 17: The Anchoring Effect

Outrage and Mental Health - NaPodPoMo 2024 - Day 23

Om

Bridging Divides

Topprogram

Toppavsnitt

Om