Dr. John Campbell

Campbellteaching

Hello Everyone, My name is John Campbell and I am a retired Nurse Teacher and former clinical nurse based in England. I also do some teaching in Asia and Africa when time permits. These videos are to help students to learn the background to all forms of health care. My PhD focused on the development of open learning resources for nurses nationally and internationally. LinkedIn profile, https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-john-campbell-5256223b/ Twitter, https://twitter.com/Johnincarlisle Disclaimer; These media including videos, book, e book, articles, podcasts are not peer-reviewed. They should never replace individual clinical judgement from your own health care provider. No media-based material on this channel is suitable for using as professional medical advice. All comments are also for educational purposed only and must never replace advice from your own health care provider

  1. −4 h

    Do viruses want to kill people

    This excellent scientific analysis of recent events continues in interview two of this series. Follow Dr. Craig on SubStack, https://drclarecraig.substack.com COVID, the untold story. So much more makes sense after this book and my first illuminating discussion with Dr. Craig. Get your copy in the UK here: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Expired-untold-Dr-Clare-Craig/dp/1739344707 For friends in the US get your copy here, https://www.amazon.com/Expired-untold-Dr-Clare-Craig/dp/1739344707 Have you ever felt the covid story did not entirely add up? Expired contains multiple eye-opening revelations about covid with compelling evidence that provides a coherent, sober and clear explanation that better fits the data we have so far. Meticulous research by pathologist Dr Clare Craig sheds light on the largely overlooked evidence of airborne virus transmission, examining twelve related beliefs on spread, lockdowns, asymptomatic infections, and masks. In addition, Expired champions the importance of Western ethical principles, damaged by pandemic actions and calls for their restoration. The covid debate has proved incredibly polarising. One side believed every intervention was saving lives, while the other emphasised the harms caused. Biased modelling based on a worst-case scenario led to fearful assumptions presented as fact. By dint of sheer repetition these ‘facts’ became unquestionable. Those scientists who dared to question were proclaimed dangerous. Welcome to Cloud-Covid-Land. Let’s bring back nuance. It’s time to return to reality." Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  2. −4 h

    Excess deaths, ambiguous news, scarce data

    Download free high-res PDFs of the posters, download free copies of my two text books. Any donations using this link help the work of campbell teaching. https://drjohncampbell.co.uk/ More data still required on the nature of the excess deaths UK Zoe data The report and the data files https://console.cloud.google.com/storage/browser/covid-public-data 1.48% in England (1 in 65 people) 1.49% in Wales (1 in 65 people) 1.86% in Northern Ireland (1 in 55 people) 1.59% in Scotland (1 in 65 people) Less than 4 in 10 patients in hospital in England with COVID-19 in October 2022 were being treated primarily for COVID-19 Deaths and excess deaths Week ending 18 November 2022 471 deaths involving COVID-19 registered in the UK Deaths involving COVID-19 accounted for 3.6% of all deaths in the UK (a fall from 4.4% in the previous week) A total of 13,236 deaths were registered in the UK 7.7% above the five-year average (941 excess deaths) The rate of death involving COVID-19 was higher for those with obesity than those without obesity https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19/latestinsights Those who reported symptoms with their first infection were less likely to be reinfected 2.1 million people in the UK were experiencing self-reported long COVID as of 1 October 2022 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    Excess deaths, ambiguous news, scarce data

  3. −5 h

    Large European vaccine allocations

    And Doctors may be punished in California. 10 vaccine doses for every EU citizen MEP Mr. Cristian Terhes https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beEfo7c_Weg&t=23s Ursula von der Leyen (President of the European commission) Her actions are currently criminally investigated Investigating the way the contract were signed Check on the European Public Prosecutor’s Office claim https://www.eppo.europa.eu/en Protecting European taxpayers’ money from criminals https://www.eppo.europa.eu/en/news/ongoing-eppo-investigation-acquisition-covid-19-vaccines-eu Court of auditors https://www.politico.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/12/SR-19-2022-COVID-19-vaccine-procurement.pdf It (EU) took measures to help compress the development timeline for vaccines from 10-15 years to 12-24 months. November 2021 Commission had signed €71 billion worth of contracts to purchase up to 4.6 billion COVID-19 vaccine doses. EU population https://www.statista.com/statistics/253372/total-population-of-the-european-union-eu/ 2021, 447.01 million (more than 10 vaccines each) Contracts never released to the public The EU had to act ahead of clear scientific data on vaccine candidates’ safety and efficacy, and therefore chose to back a range of candidates The Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine dominates the portfolio in 2022-2023 because of, according to the Commission, the company’s ability to reliably supply the EU. California Approves Bill to Punish Doctors Who Spread False Information https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/29/technology/california-doctors-covid-misinformation.html https://www.davisvanguard.org/2022/10/new-california-bill-attempts-to-prevent-doctors-from-spreading-covid-misinformation/ https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2022-10-06/spreading-lies-about-covid-19-could-get-doctors-disciplined-in-california California’s Legislature, Monday Doctors a duty to provide their patients with accurate, science-based information Approved bill allowing regulators to punish doctors, for spreading false information about Covid-19 vaccinations and treatments. Designate spreading false or misleading medical information, unprofessional conduct subject to punishment, Medical Board of California Holding incompetent or ill-intentioned doctors accountable State Senator Richard Pan In order for a patient to give informed consent, they have to be well informed Intended to address the most egregious cases of deliberately misleading patients. Governor Newsom, seems to be signed for 1st Jan 2023 American Medical Association Warned that spreading disinformation violates the code of ethics deliberately disseminated with malicious intent or an intent to mislead Spreading information that is contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care Scope to deal directly with doctors’ direct interaction with patients (does not address comments online or on television) Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    Large European vaccine allocations

  4. −5 h

    Core T cells

    Professor Angus Dalgleish, (Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists, Fellow of Medical Science.) Professor Dalgleish is a highly experienced doctor, physician, medical teacher, medical author and researcher with over 500 primary research publications. He was also a pioneering researcher into HIV/AIDS. Here we discuss the recently observed changes in cancer presentations and deaths. Some of the discussion considers this research paper noting excess cancer deaths in Japan. Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/ Gibo M, Kojima S, Fujisawa A, et al. (April 08, 2024) Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Cureus 16(4): e57860. DOI 10.7759/cureus.57860 Conclusions Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination, rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown. Researchers have reported that the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine may pose the risk of development and progression of cancer. Several case reports have described cancer developing or worsening after vaccination and discussed possible causal links between cancer and mRNA-LNP vaccination. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    Core T cells

  5. −6 h

    Natural resistance in Italy

    Clear graphics from Italy, The decline of COVID-19 severity and lethality over two years of pandemic https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.07.01.22277137v1 20 to 40-fold reductions during the period of dominance of Omicron compared to the initial acute phase. Phase 1, Ancestral Probability of hospitalization per infection of 5.4% Probability of ICU admission of 0.65% Probability of death of 2.2% Phase 5, Omicron Probability of hospitalization, 95.1% reduction in risk Probability of ICU admission, 97.3% reduction in risk Probability of death, 97.5% reduction in risk Using epidemiological and genomic surveillance data To estimate the number of daily infections in Italy in the first two years of pandemic. Attack rate Ascertainment of SARS-CoV-2 infections Phase 1 (ancestral) NPIs Attack rate 2.8% Phase 2 (ancestral) Less stringent NPIs Attack rate 11.4% Phase 3 Alpha variant Mid -February 2021 to early July 2021 Alpha infected about 10.1% of the Italian population Phase 4, Delta Second half of 2021 Progressive relaxation of NPIs Attack rate 17.3% Phase 5, Omicron End of December 2021 Attack rate, 51.1% of the Italian population became infected with Omicron Evolution of population susceptibility Percentage of the population susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 End of first phase, 97.5% February 20, 2022, 13% By February 20th, 2022 a marked proportion of individuals unprotected against SARS-CoV-2 infection can be found among vaccinated subjects, due to the waning of vaccine protection Evolution of COVID-19 severity and lethality Probability of hospitalisation Probability of ICU admission Probability of death Evolution of population susceptibility Natural, post infection immunity is now the main factor reducing population sensitivity Vaccination protection is seen to be declining Omicron natural infection had the largest protective effect Repeat exposure to omicron (and sub variants) is likely to have the same effect going forward. NPIs will reduce repeat exposures NPIs will reduce exposure to other respiratory viruses such as RSV Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    Natural resistance in Italy

  6. −7 h

    Shroud: Scientific aspects

    With Dr. Richard Sorensen. Shroud of Turin Website, https://shroud.com/ Links for Rich, YouTube videos: "Biblical Mysteries Explained" https://www.youtube.com/@BiblicalMysteriesExplained Article sites: academia.edu, researchgate.net, richardsorensen.com, unholygrail.net/blog Watch this excellent film from David Rolfe, https://whocanhebe.com/Stream.html Watch this excellent film from David Rolfe, https://whocanhebe.com/Stream.html Link to download my PowerPoint, https://drjohncampbell.co.uk/ Shroud.com https://www.shroud.com/menu.htm Shroudphotos.com https://shroudphotos.com 3D Image https://shroud3d.com/introduction/3d-studies-of-the-shroud-of-turin-history/ Shroud fabric https://www.shroud.com/pdfs/ssi3233part3.pdf 3D reconstruction https://www.shroud.com/pdfs/ssi3233part3.pdf STURP conclusions https://www.shroud.com/78conclu.htm Study on radiocarbon result https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040603104004745 New dating study on X ray scattering https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/5/2/47 Polon studies https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:210758-1 The Shroud of Turin is purported to be the burial shroud of Jesus Christ, and its authenticity has thus aroused intense and sometimes hostile debate between those who believe that the Shroud is authentic, and those who do not. Accepting or rejecting the authenticity of the Shroud is to many an issue of Christian or anti-Christian conviction. This is especially true for anti-Christians - if the Shroud is a fake it doesn't really affect the pro-Christian side, but if it is authentic then it is dramatic evidence in favor of it. So the Shroud of Turin is the most highly and intensively studied artifact in the history of the world. "Somewhere between 100,000 and 150,000 scientific man-hours have been spent on it, with the best analytical tools available” according to one source. 2. Please note that this is not about "proof" in the scientific sense because it is not possible to prove anything historical. For example, we can't prove that Julius Caesar lived, so likewise we can't prove that the Shroud was the burial cloth of Christ. What we can do is examine the evidence that supports or challenges that assertion. Regardless of conviction, those who seriously seek to study the Shroud should approach it with an open mind and suspend their religious persuasions as they examine the evidence, both pro and con. 3. Regardless of our convictions, it is right that we should question the Shroud and approach it with skepticism because the history of religious artifacts is filled with fraudulent attempts to make money at the expense of naïve worshippers. Many fake shrouds have been produced, and in 1902 a researcher claimed that there were forty-two medieval shrouds of Christ around Europe. However, they were not intended to deceive anyone - most were either simply pieces of cloth or artistic copies, and some of these “shrouds” still exist. Scientific challenges 1. There have been many attempts to debunk the Shroud, and perhaps the main one is in regard to dating. The Carbon 14 dating in 1988 indicated that the cloth was medieval (1260 to 1390 AD). However, it was later discovered that the pieces used for testing contained rewoven fibers that had been used to repair the cloth, so the C14 dating was discredited. A new non-destructive method of dating ancient textiles known as WAXS (wide-angle x- ray scattering) has been developed which operates by detecting the degree of structural degradation of threads from a cloth. Using that method a thread from the Shroud was dated to the same period as a line fragment from the siege of Masada (55-74 AD), so it places the Shroud in the era of Christ's death and resurrection, ca. 33 AD. No other grave cloth in history has ever had an image on it like the Shroud. Other scientific challenges have claimed that the Shroud was: 2 Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  7. −7 h

    Hunger for quality science and medicine

    Professor Angus Dalgleish, (Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians, Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists, Fellow of Medical Science.) Professor Dalgleish is a highly experienced doctor, physician, medical teacher, medical author and researcher with over 500 primary research publications. He was also a pioneering researcher into HIV/AIDS. Here we discuss the recently observed changes in cancer presentations and deaths. Some of the discussion considers this research paper noting excess cancer deaths in Japan. Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan https://www.cureus.com/articles/196275-increased-age-adjusted-cancer-mortality-after-the-third-mrna-lipid-nanoparticle-vaccine-dose-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-japan#!/ Gibo M, Kojima S, Fujisawa A, et al. (April 08, 2024) Increased Age-Adjusted Cancer Mortality After the Third mRNA-Lipid Nanoparticle Vaccine Dose During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Cureus 16(4): e57860. DOI 10.7759/cureus.57860 Conclusions Statistically significant increases in age-adjusted mortality rates of all cancer and some specific types of cancer, namely, ovarian cancer, leukemia, prostate, lip/oral/pharyngeal, pancreatic, and breast cancers, were observed in 2022 after two-thirds of the Japanese population had received the third or later dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine. These particularly marked increases in mortality rates of these ERα-sensitive cancers may be attributable to several mechanisms of the mRNA-LNP vaccination, rather than COVID-19 infection itself or reduced cancer care due to the lockdown. Researchers have reported that the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-LNP vaccine may pose the risk of development and progression of cancer. Several case reports have described cancer developing or worsening after vaccination and discussed possible causal links between cancer and mRNA-LNP vaccination. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    Hunger for quality science and medicine

  8. −8 h

    Extracting wisdom from the pandemic

    The retrospective report Technical report on the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/technical-report-on-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-the-uk https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/technical-report-on-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-the-uk/list-of-chapters-authors-reviewers-and-contributors Baroness Hallett, independent public enquiry https://covid19.public-inquiry.uk Set up to look at the pandemic https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9eFdKVwD1ARs3j9BSoGndw Online form launched 16th November https://share.covid19.public-inquiry.uk/s/your-experience Chapter 1, Section 6 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/technical-report-on-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-the-uk/chapter-1-understanding-the-pathogen What was the duration of, naturally acquired immunity, and vaccine acquired immunity, and the risk of reinfection over time? By early 2020 Data emerged indicating that the majority of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 displayed an antibody response between 10 to 14 days after symptom onset Throughout the first half of 2021 Following natural infection Antibody detectable in saliva for at least 8 months, and in blood for at least 9 months. The presence of antibody, associated with a protective effect against infection, at least 7 to 10 months Cell-mediated immune response to SARS-CoV-2 was shown to be detectable up to 8 months after infection Reflections and advice for a future CMO or GCSA (for Chapter 1) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/technical-report-on-the-covid-19-pandemic-in-the-uk/chapter-1-understanding-the-pathogen#questions-on-the-disease Point 1 Scientific and medical advice will often need to be formulated on the basis of limited data. Point 2 Understanding the pathogen and the disease was a global effort, particularly at the outset, and sharing data and expertise from the beginning was key. Point 3 Gaining a clear understanding of the pathogen and the disease required an array of cross-disciplinary studies to be initiated quickly. Point 4 Building on and adapting existing research systems and networks was usually much faster than setting up new systems, but strong leadership, direction and coordination are required. Point 5 Viral variants, population behaviours and population immunity changed significantly over time requiring continuation of studies. Not mentioned State secrecy needs to be eliminated, early, open sharing of all science. No more cover ups Dangerous gain of function research should stop Procurements should be on the basis of clinical and scientific need, not commercial interests Powerful international corporations should not be allowed to influence the agenda All pharmaceuticals should be considered, rather than just expensive ones Powerful international corporations and individuals should not be allowed to control public communications Early scientific peer review must be allowed and encouraged, based on fully disclosed primary data Primary anonymised data from clinical trials must be made public for the worlds clever people to process Scientists and doctors with ‘outlying views’ should be judged on the quality of the evidence they present Play the ball Further comments Britain a 'prolonged period' of excess deaths but not from coronavirus itself Heart disease and cancer, stayed away or could not access treatment Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    Extracting wisdom from the pandemic
Visa alla (497)

Om

Hello Everyone, My name is John Campbell and I am a retired Nurse Teacher and former clinical nurse based in England. I also do some teaching in Asia and Africa when time permits. These videos are to help students to learn the background to all forms of health care. My PhD focused on the development of open learning resources for nurses nationally and internationally. LinkedIn profile, https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-john-campbell-5256223b/ Twitter, https://twitter.com/Johnincarlisle Disclaimer; These media including videos, book, e book, articles, podcasts are not peer-reviewed. They should never replace individual clinical judgement from your own health care provider. No media-based material on this channel is suitable for using as professional medical advice. All comments are also for educational purposed only and must never replace advice from your own health care provider

Information

  • Skapad av
    Campbellteaching
  • Aktiva år
    2026
  • Avsnitt
    497
  • Leverantör

Du kanske också gillar