3onefive

Jones Oliver

Apologetics and Biblical studies. 

Episodes

  1. Jun 30

    #5: The Virgin Birth of Christ by Machen - Chapter 2

    Intro: When discussing the reliability of the gospel narratives - most of us simply appeal to the field of NTTC. But Machen, in his work, The Virgin Birth of Christ, does the heavy lifting.  In turn, that heavy lifting gives us some pretty heavy reading. Chapter 2 outline: Outside objectionsDrastic change in language use from 1:1-4 to 1:5-2:52.Marcion’s version of Luke that didn’t include the birth narrative.  Due to the particular view that he did not believe that Jesus had actually been born.  Another obscure example: 1195 manuscript of the Armenian translation of Ephraem’s Commentary on the Diatessaron.  Machen then points to Titian’s Diatessaron, a Gospel harmony, dated to the 2nd century, that included Luke’s virgin birth account.  “Inside” objections - a critical look at Luke’s own words“Very pedantic” views of Acts 1:1 and Luke 1:1.Proper translation of Luke 3:22:“Well pleased” vs. “begotten thee”Option 1: “...with whom I am well pleased” (Option 2: “...this day I have begotten thee” (a possible reference to Psalm 2:7)Machen makes the case for Option 1.What was the significance of the Holy Spirit descending on JesusThen particulars in Luke’s words from Luke 3:23:“as was supposed” Does this phrase presuppose (or not) the virgin birth narrative?“Began” - began what?Machen will extend into a side discussion on the importance of the baptism of Jesus as the start of His public ministry. Parallels to the descriptions to the start of the John the Baptist’s and Jesus’ ministries.  Gradual addition / agglomeration over timeMachen addresses briefly. Conclusion“If literary criticism has established anything at all, it has established the fact that the narrative of the birth and infancy is an integral part of the Third Gospel.” More sources / notes: PDF of The Virgin Birth of ChristPaperback book of The Virgin Birth of ChristThe Diatessaron of TatianConnect: linktr.ee/3onefive

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
2 Ratings

About

Apologetics and Biblical studies.