Golf 247.eu: The Global Platform for Innovative Technologies and Teaching Concepts.

Golf247.eu
  • 0.0(0개의 평가)
  • 골프
  • 매일 업데이트

Golf247.eu is a technology company that brings together the best teaching concepts in the world into one platform, aimed at connecting golf instructors, academies, clubs, schools, national PGAs, and golf associations. By leveraging cutting-edge tools, it helps these groups deliver better golf instruction, manage their businesses more efficiently, and provide faster services with more time-saving solutions. Golf247 continuously seeks new features from across the globe that can enhance the capabilities of PGAs, golf clubs, academies, and instructors.

  1. SFT Golf Academy 360°: KI-gestützter Golfunterricht der Zukunft

    4시간 전

    SFT Golf Academy 360°: KI-gestützter Golfunterricht der Zukunft

    Aktuelle Entwicklungen im digitalen Marketing und in der sportlichen Leistungsanalyse zeigen einen klaren Wandel: weg von subjektiven Meinungen hin zu messbaren, datenbasierten Systemen. Interaktive Lead-Magnete wie KI-gestützte Generatoren und personalisierte Analysetools übertreffen heute statische Inhalte, indem sie hochwertigere Interessenten anziehen und qualifizieren. Vertrauen entsteht zunehmend durch individualisierten, datenbasierten Mehrwert statt durch allgemeine Versprechen. Dieselbe Transformation verändert auch den Golfunterricht. Modernes Coaching basiert auf 3D-Tracking, Bewegungssensoren und biomechanischer Analyse, um das Training an die individuelle Biologie anzupassen, anstatt ein einziges universelles Schwungmodell zu lehren. Die Balance-Forschung zeigt, dass es keinen allgemein „richtigen“ Golfschwung gibt. Jeder Spieler erzeugt Kraft und Stabilität über eine dominante Core-Region: Upper, Middle oder Lower. Upper Core (ca. 65 % der Spieler)Diese Spieler nutzen eine schmalere Standbreite und balancieren über den Fußballen. Geschwindigkeit erzeugen sie vor allem durch vertikale Bodenreaktionskräfte („Launch“) in Kombination mit Rotation. Ihre Hüften rotieren im Treffmoment weniger stark, und sie richten sich natürlich durch den Ballkontakt auf. Für dieses Profil führt der Versuch, „unten zu bleiben“, zu Kraftverlust und Ineffizienz. Middle Core (ca. 25 %)Dies ist das Hybridmodell. Die Spieler verwenden eine mittlere Standbreite mit zentrierter Druckverteilung. Der Rückschwung erfolgt als koordinierte Ganzkörperbewegung. Im Treffmoment sind die Hüften moderat freigedreht. Sie kombinieren als Einzige alle drei Kraftkomponenten: horizontal (Glide), rotatorisch (Spin) und vertikal (Launch). Dieses Profil ähnelt dem häufig gelehrten modernen Tour-Schwung. Lower Core (ca. 10 %, häufiger bei Frauen)Diese Spieler wählen die breiteste Standbreite und balancieren über dem Zentrum der Fußgewölbe. Sie verwenden meist einen stärkeren Griff und mehr Schaftneigung. Die Kraft entsteht nahezu ausschließlich durch horizontale und rotatorische Kräfte bei minimaler vertikaler Bewegung. Aufgrund dieses Kraftmusters können sie ihre Haltung im Treffmoment stabil halten und eine deutliche Hüftrotation erreichen. Die Zuordnung erfolgt nicht nach Vorlieben, sondern durch biomechanische Diagnostik. Mithilfe isometrischer Übungen und Körpermessungen wird der individuelle „Carrying Angle“ (Power Angle) bestimmt. Dieser beschreibt das Verhältnis zwischen Wirbelsäulenwinkel und Oberschenkelwinkel bei einer definierten Standbreite. Upper Core: Carrying Angle ≤ 162°Middle Core: 152°–157°Lower Core: ≥ 148° Sind Standbreite, Haltung und Griff nicht auf den natürlichen Carrying Angle abgestimmt, wird die Bewegung eingeschränkt, die Kraft reduziert und die körperliche Belastung erhöht. Auf geschäftlicher Ebene verändern automatisierte Marketingsysteme und objektive Leistungsmetriken die Golfbranche nachhaltig. Digitale Funnels, personalisierte Datenauswertung und skalierbare Trainingsmodelle schaffen messbare Ergebnisse und langfristige Kundenbindung. Die Zukunft des Golfsports liegt in der Integration KI-gestützter Analysen, biomechanischer Individualisierung und automatisierter Wertschöpfungssysteme – wissenschaftlich fundiert, messbar und reproduzierbar. www.Golf247.eu

    25분
  2. #507 The Biomechanical Reinvention of Anthony Kim

    10시간 전

    #507 The Biomechanical Reinvention of Anthony Kim

    This report analyzes Anthony Kim’s 2026 victory following a sixteen-year absence and compares his 2010 championship swing with his 2025 model using 3D biomechanics. The data shows a clear evolution: from an explosive, high-variability, lateral-dependent action to a compact, rotation-dominant and centered motion. The shift reflects a move from raw amplitude to mechanical efficiency, face control, and long-term sustainability. 1. Address – A Centered Foundation In 2010, Kim set up with pronounced reverse tilt. By 2025, he adopted a more stacked geometry. Sway Gap: –3.6" → –2.2"Reduced lateral tilt positioned his chest more vertically over the pelvis, improving balance and low-point control from the start. 2. Top of Backswing – Compact Over Extreme His 2010 swing exceeded modern Tour averages in rotational range. The 2025 version is shorter and more controlled. Chest Turn: –98° → –93°Pelvis Turn: –42° → –39°By reducing amplitude, Kim maintained functional tension instead of overstretching, allowing cleaner sequencing and fewer timing dependencies. 3. Transition – Rotational Efficiency The biggest change occurred in the downswing. In 2010 he relied on lateral slide and “hang back.” In 2025 the body rotates earlier with less sway. Chest (arm parallel): 10° more open than 2010 Sway Gap: –3.6" → –1.9"This reduced reliance on late hand manipulation and improved face stability. 4. Impact – Stability and Control The 2025 motion favors rotation over lateral “bump.” Chest Turn: 27° → 32°Sway Gap: –6.7" → –4.6"A more open, centered impact enhances compression, keeps the lead arm connected, and reduces lumbar shear forces. Strategic Transformation From Launcher to Optimizer:2010 relied on large range and lateral slide (elastic-dominant). 2025 generates speed through tighter sequencing and rotational efficiency Injury Prevention:Reduced side bend and sway lower the “crunch factor,” promoting longevity. Comparison to Modern Tour Averages Kim’s 2025 metrics align more closely with Tour norms than his 2010 swing. His –93° chest turn remains slightly above average (–87°), preserving coil potential. At impact, his –4.6" sway gap is more centered than the Tour mean (–6.0"), suggesting superior stack and lower spinal stress. He is slightly less open at impact than average, indicating a balanced blend of rotation and timing. Contrast with the Modern “Launcher” Model Compared to Rory McIlroy’s high-amplitude, high-launch style, Kim’s 2025 swing is more compact and stacked. McIlroy maximizes turn and backward torso lean to optimize launch and distance. Kim prioritizes centered geometry, compression consistency, and reduced mechanical volatility. Why It Worked at Adelaide His final-round 63 reflected a motion built for pressure: Less timing dependencyImproved face controlBetter low-point stabilityLower mechanical volatilityKim’s reinvention demonstrates that performance longevity at elite level is not built on preserving explosive youth mechanics, but on refining geometry, sequencing, and centered rotational efficiency. 📺 The Explainerwww.Golf247.eu

    15분
  3. #506 Precision Driver Fitting for the Time-Starved Golfer

    1일 전

    #506 Precision Driver Fitting for the Time-Starved Golfer

    This overview explains how smart driver fitting helps busy golfers reduce a slice without rebuilding the entire swing. A slice usually results from an open clubface and off-center contact. Instead of chasing technical perfection, fitting focuses on controlling impact conditions. The first priority is center-face strike and clubhead stability. High-MOI driver heads reduce twisting at impact. A slightly shorter shaft increases strike consistency. Optimized loft and face settings lower excessive spin and curvature. The goal is simple: protect the golfer from their worst swings and deliver immediate improvement. Fitting can also support simplified swing models such as the Single Plane or Setup-4-Impact approach. These concepts reduce moving parts and physical stress, making the motion easier to repeat with limited practice time. Core fitting advantages • Correct shaft length improves posture and strike location.• Proper geometry aligns clubshaft and lead arm more naturally.• Reduced need for compensations in transition.• Equipment matched to current biomechanics maximizes existing ability. Still, equipment is not a magic solution. A driver only performs as well as the delivered impact: face angle, path and strike location determine ball flight. The Single Plane setup mirrors impact geometry at address. This simplifies motion and reduces spinal stress. In many conventional swings, the pelvis rises 2–3 inches near impact. Combined with rotation, this increases compression and shear in the lumbar spine. In a Single Plane model, the pelvis remains level or slightly lowers (approx. 0.9 inches). Because the club is already aligned on the impact plane at address, no vertical lift is required. The Crunch Factor combines lateral trunk flexion velocity and rotational velocity. Traditional swings may increase side bend about 19° during transition. Pre-setting spine tilt to roughly 15–20° reduces dynamic adjustment to about 10°. Less movement during peak rotation lowers shear stress on the lower back. Pelvis and shoulders rotate in synchronized patterns through impact, limiting torsional shear. Maintaining flex in the lead knee acts as a shock absorber, preventing force from transferring directly into the spine. The X-factor stretch is the dynamic increase in separation between hips and shoulders during transition. • Elite players increase separation about 19%.• Lower-skilled players average around 13%.• The stretch occurs when hips initiate while shoulders complete the backswing.• This elastic loading enhances the stretch-shorten cycle and speed production. Static separation at the top matters less than dynamic stretch and sequencing. Impact-centric models help preserve this sequence: pelvis → thorax → arms → club. Biomechanical Advantages of the Single Plane Model1. Eliminating the Vertical Pelvic “Jump”2. Reducing the “Crunch Factor”3. Mirrored Rotation and Lead Knee FlexionX-Factor and Power. 📺 The Explainerwww.Golf247.eu

    17분
  4. #505 The Time-Starved Golfer: Solving the Slice Through Strategic Fitting

    2일 전

    #505 The Time-Starved Golfer: Solving the Slice Through Strategic Fitting

    This approach corrects a slice without rebuilding the swing. Instead of months of technical changes, the focus is equipment optimization—protecting your current motion and improving results immediately. For players with limited practice time, this is strategic performance engineering, not swing reconstruction. The goal is simple: maximize efficiency, reduce curvature, and increase consistency. Center Contact Over MechanicsRather than overhauling technique, fitting prioritizes consistent center strikes. Center contact reduces curvature, increases ball speed, and delivers the fastest measurable performance gain. Forgiveness Through Stability (High MOI)A high-MOI driver head resists twisting on off-center hits—especially heel strikes common in slicers. Less twisting means less curvature and less distance loss. Spin and Face ControlExcess spin fuels a slice. Through hosel and loft adjustments, the face can be slightly closed and launch conditions optimized. Lower spin reduces curvature without changing swing path. Shaft Length: Control Beats Raw SpeedLonger shafts promise speed but often reduce strike quality. A slightly shorter shaft improves control, increases centered contact, raises smash factor, and tightens dispersion.A centered strike with slightly less speed frequently travels farther than a faster heel strike. Why Shorter Often Goes Farther• Better center contact• Higher smash factor (efficient energy transfer)• Tighter dispersion• Greater confidence Distance comes from efficiency, not swing effort. Finding the Ideal Shaft LengthThere is no static formula based on height. The correct length is found through testing: • Center-strike consistency• Highest smash factor• Tightest dispersion pattern For most time-limited golfers, the ideal driver is slightly shorter than standard stock length. Understanding the Slice MechanismHeel strikes create gear effect. The clubface twists open, adding slice spin and curvature.Low-face strikes increase spin dramatically.More spin = more curve. Reducing spin stabilizes flight. How to Reduce Spin• Strike center, not heel or low face• Optimize loft and hosel settings• Use a high-MOI head to resist twisting High-MOI heads keep the face more square at impact, reducing side spin. Heel strikes curve less and fly straighter. Performance Gains From Proper FittingDistance improvements of 30–40 yards are possible—not from swinging harder, but from optimizing efficiency: • +4–6 mph ball speed• 400–800 rpm spin reduction• Higher smash factor• More consistent center contact This is engineering your current swing—not rebuilding it. For the time-starved golfer, the equation is clear:Control beats speed.Efficiency beats effort. 📺 The Explainerwww.Golf247.eu

    14분
  5. #504 Pro V1 vs. Pro V1x – Core Differences

    3일 전

    #504 Pro V1 vs. Pro V1x – Core Differences

    The Pro V1 and Pro V1x are both premium, tour-level golf balls, yet they are engineered with distinct performance profiles. The differences are not cosmetic; they are built into the core construction, compression, aerodynamics, spin behavior, and overall flight window. Choosing between them depends on launch characteristics, spin tendencies, and preferred feel. Flight and Trajectory The Pro V1 is designed to produce a mid-flight, penetrating trajectory. It typically launches slightly lower than the Pro V1x and maintains a stable, controlled ball flight. This makes it well suited for players who already generate height naturally or who struggle with excessive spin and ballooning in windy conditions. The Pro V1x is engineered for a higher launch and a steeper descent angle. The added peak height helps maximize carry distance and improves stopping power on firm greens. Players who need help keeping the ball in the air, particularly with long irons, often benefit from this higher flight window. Spin Profile Off the driver, both models are designed to keep spin relatively low for optimal distance. The Pro V1 generally spins slightly less, supporting a flatter, more penetrating driver flight. The separation becomes more noticeable with irons and wedges. The Pro V1x generates more spin on full iron shots and approach shots into the green. This increased spin creates a steeper landing angle and greater stopping power. Around the greens, both balls feature a cast urethane cover for high short-game spin, but the Pro V1x tends to produce marginally more check on wedge shots. Construction and Compression The Pro V1 uses a three-piece construction with a single solid core. This structure contributes to its softer overall compression and smoother feel at impact. The Pro V1x features a four-piece, dual-core design. The dual-core configuration increases overall compression and creates a firmer feel. This construction also supports its higher launch and increased iron spin characteristics. In compression testing, the Pro V1 typically measures in the high-80s to low-90s range. The Pro V1x generally measures in the high-90s, making it noticeably firmer. Feel and Feedback Feel differences are primarily related to compression and internal structure rather than the cover, as both models use a similar cast urethane material. The Pro V1 delivers a softer sensation on full shots and off the putter face, often described as muted and smooth. The Pro V1x provides firmer, more pronounced feedback at impact. Some players prefer this “solid” response because it offers clearer auditory and tactile feedback. Player Fit Choose the Pro V1 if you prefer a softer feel, want a slightly lower ball flight, or need to reduce spin. Choose the Pro V1x if you prefer a firmer feel, need a higher launch, and want additional iron and wedge spin for maximum stopping power. 📺 The Explainerwww.Golf247.eu

    16분
  6. #503 The Henrik Jentsch Blueprint: Masters of the Ball Flight

    4일 전

    #503 The Henrik Jentsch Blueprint: Masters of the Ball Flight

    This framework outlines the philosophy of Danish instructor Henrik Jentsch, whose teaching shifted golf instruction from swing aesthetics to impact physics. His central maxim — “The Ball Never Lies” — replaced model-based swing ideals with objective ball-flight analysis. What matters is not how the swing looks, but what the clubface delivers at impact. From Positions to Impact Truth Traditional instruction focused on static checkpoints. Jentsch reversed the process. He analyzed start direction, curvature and spin to diagnose impact conditions. Instead of prescribing ideal positions, he worked backwards from ball flight. A swing could look unconventional yet function perfectly if the face-to-path relationship was correct. Feel vs. Real Jentsch addressed the gap between what players feel and what actually happens. Ball flight became the final judge. His descriptive model relied on measurable reality rather than instructor opinion, adjusting only what influenced impact variables. Biomechanics and Ground Forces His work integrated kinematics and Ground Reaction Forces. Power originates from pushing against the ground (Newton’s Third Law). Faulty ball flights often reflect breakdowns in sequencing — inefficient energy transfer from ground to torso to club. This body-driven model replaced hand manipulation and anticipated today’s launch monitor era. The Ball Roll Laws Applying impact physics to putting, Jentsch reframed putting as collision science. The key variables: launch angle, side spin, skid phase and true roll. Minimize skid, maximize immediate forward roll Eliminate side spin through square face-to-path delivery Fit loft, lie and weight objectively to stroke mechanics Using high-precision 3D systems, putting became measurable rather than mystical. The 2026 Golf Manifesto Jentsch introduced four strict scoring rules designed to remove emotional decision-making: Fairway First – If you don’t hit driver, you must hit the fairway. Wedge = Green – Any wedge must finish on the green. Avoid the Dead Zone (30–80 yds) – Play to full yardages or inside 30. 15-Yard Safety Rule – Required carry + 15 yards = minimum capability. Example: A 200-yard carry demands a reliable 215-yard average carry. No “max” swings allowed. If your stock carry doesn’t meet the number, you must lay up. Know Your Numbers Carry distances must reflect repeatable shots, not perfect strikes. Outliers are removed. The stock number — hit 7–8 times out of 10 — becomes the decision baseline. These numbers are written into the yardage book as a visual contract. Conclusion Jentsch replaced guesswork with measurement. Ball flight became the only objective truth in a subjective game. His methods anticipated the data era and remain foundational in modern biomechanics, launch monitor coaching and AI-driven analysis. Golf, in his system, is no longer about hope — it is about physics, discipline and measurable reality. 📺 The Explainerwww.Golf247.eu

    17분
  7. #502 Engineering the Elite Swing: The Henrik Jentsch Method

    5일 전

    #502 Engineering the Elite Swing: The Henrik Jentsch Method

    In this technical overview, Henrik Jentsch presents a golf instruction system built on biomechanics, perceptual recalibration, and measurable impact science. His philosophy is clear: “We do not guess. We measure.” The swing is not treated as an artistic mystery but as a system that can be engineered for precision, efficiency, and longevity. The method begins with correcting visual alignment. Many golfers believe they are square to the target when, in reality, they are biased left or right. Through calibration drills, players learn to align the shaft and clubface accurately—even if the correct position initially feels uncomfortable. This recalibration of perception is foundational. Before mechanics improve, the brain must accept reality over feel. Central to the system is the concept that the release organizes the body. Unlike approaches that focus first on footwork or rotation, Jentsch applies a cause-and-effect biomechanical model: the hands determine delivery, and delivery dictates body response. When the release point is corrected, the lower body reorganizes naturally. Weight shifts forward, the lead side stabilizes, and the kinematic sequence remains intact—without forced movements. The clubface squares dynamically as a consequence, not through manipulation. Structural integrity is equally important. The method manages side bend carefully to protect the spine while maintaining power. Too little side bend produces steep, over-the-top transitions and slicing patterns. Too much side bend overloads the lumbar spine, especially the L4–L5 region, increasing injury risk. The goal is structural intelligence: balancing power, efficiency, and long-term physical health. Impact is considered the only moment that truly matters. The system evaluates performance through ten measurable impact factors: Horizontal contact (heel–center–toe)Vertical contact (thin–center–fat)Face angleDynamic loftGear effectSwing pathAttack angleLow point locationLow point depthClubhead speedBy refining the release and controlling shaft plane, players directly influence face orientation, path direction, shaft lean, and low point control. The result is improved compression, tighter dispersion, and greater efficiency—without increasing physical effort. The process concludes with structured repetition. Slow-motion drills and controlled integration build stable motor patterns that hold under pressure. Random practice is replaced by intelligent training. Ultimately, the Henrik Jentsch Method replaces guesswork with science. Through perception correction, biomechanical sequencing, and measurable impact control, it constructs a sustainable, high-performance golf swing engineered for both excellence and longevity. 📺 The Explainerwww.Golf247.eu

    17분
  8. #501 Anthony Kim’s Resurrection: Redemption, Rankings, and a New Pathway in Global Golf (2026)

    6일 전

    #501 Anthony Kim’s Resurrection: Redemption, Rankings, and a New Pathway in Global Golf (2026)

    The early 2026 professional golf season has been defined by major competitive, structural, and emotional storylines. The most powerful narrative emerged at LIV Golf Adelaide, where Anthony Kim captured his first victory in nearly sixteen years, transforming a tournament win into one of the sport’s most remarkable comeback stories. Kim’s triumph ended a drought stretching back to the 2010 Houston Open. After disappearing from professional golf for over a decade due to injury and personal struggles, he returned to LIV in 2024 but initially struggled, even facing relegation. He secured his 2026 season through the LIV Promotions event and arrived in Adelaide after resolving last-minute visa complications. Despite limited preparation, he delivered a bogey-free final round 63, defeating Jon Rahm and Bryson DeChambeau by three strokes. The victory coincided with a historic Official World Golf Ranking policy change. Beginning in 2026, LIV events now award ranking points, though classified as “Small Field Tournaments.” Points are distributed only to the top ten finishers. Kim earned approximately 23 ranking points for the win, vaulting from No. 847 to No. 203 overnight. One week earlier, a T-22 finish in Riyadh brought him zero points under the same system. This structural shift reactivated a legitimate pathway to major championship qualification for LIV players. Automatic entry typically requires a Top 50 or Top 60 world ranking. Kim, now at No. 203, must climb roughly 140 positions. Under the top-10-only format, consistent mid-field finishes yield nothing. To realistically reach the Top 60, he likely needs two additional victories or multiple podium finishes. The policy has sparked mixed reactions. Jon Rahm welcomed the recognition but questioned the fairness of limiting points to ten players. Bryson DeChambeau expressed frustration, noting the league made format adjustments yet still faces restrictions. LIV officials criticized the rule, arguing that finishing 11th is treated the same as finishing last, creating an “all-or-nothing” environment unique in modern rankings history. Beyond governance, Kim’s win carried cultural weight. Once known for a party-driven lifestyle, he emphasized sobriety, family, and personal growth. He celebrated quietly with his wife and daughter, calling it the most meaningful moment of his life. The emotional shift resonated widely, reframing him from unrealized talent to symbol of resilience. Commercially, the Adelaide event set attendance records and reinforced LIV’s strength in Australia. Kim became an instant crowd favorite, particularly after a dramatic birdie at the “Watering Hole” sparked a surge of energy. While the victory does not guarantee major entry, it fundamentally altered Kim’s trajectory. He moved from statistical irrelevance outside the Top 800 to a competitive factor within the global system. His stated goal is simple: continue improving, win more trophies, and use golf as a platform to inspire others. In early 2026, Anthony Kim’s comeback stands as both a personal resurrection and a catalyst in golf’s evolving competitive structure. 📺 The Explainerwww.Golf247.eu

    11분
모두 보기(539개)

소개

Golf247.eu is a technology company that brings together the best teaching concepts in the world into one platform, aimed at connecting golf instructors, academies, clubs, schools, national PGAs, and golf associations. By leveraging cutting-edge tools, it helps these groups deliver better golf instruction, manage their businesses more efficiently, and provide faster services with more time-saving solutions. Golf247 continuously seeks new features from across the globe that can enhance the capabilities of PGAs, golf clubs, academies, and instructors.

정보