The episode I listened to repeatedly made accusation of someone else engaging in fallacies but without identifying what the fallacies were. Meanwhile, and I guess ironically, the hosts themselves committed both “ad hominem” fallacy and the “petitio principii” fallacy (begging the question). Also, the hosts violated the principle of non-contradiction which is even worse than a committing a fallacy.
So yeah, these people are intellectual lightweights. Also they claimed to be non-partisan while being highly partisan. This podcast is not for me because I like to listen to interesting and intelligent people from whom I can learn things. All I learned from these hosts was not to waste any more time listening to them.
