A Thousand Small Fires

A thousand small fires

What would it look like to organise the world around care instead of profit? Not as a fantasy. As a serious, uncomfortable, unresolved question. A Thousand Small Fires is a podcast that takes anarchist, feminist, and queer thought seriously — not as a doctrine to follow, but as a lens for asking better questions. About work, food, love, land, the state, the prison, the family, the body. About who decides, on whose terms, and what gets built when people refuse to wait for permission. Each episode is around 15 minutes — long enough to go somewhere real, short enough to earn your attention. The show is philosophical in tone and open in frame. It holds contradictions rather than resolving them. It cites thinkers without hiding behind them. It uses history as evidence rather than as comfort. The anarchist tradition argues that hierarchy — in governments, workplaces, relationships, and intimate life — is not natural or inevitable. It was made, and it can be unmade. This show follows that argument wherever it goes, including into the places the mainstream left doesn't want to look. Topics across Season 1 include: mutual aid and what makes it different from charity; the care labour that the economy runs on and refuses to count; food, land, and the global struggle for food sovereignty; the women who built anarchism and were written out of its history; queer liberation as a refusal, not a request; love, relationship anarchy, and the politics of intimate life; prison abolition; settler colonialism; carceral feminism; and what it means to start building the world you want inside the one that exists. No fixed answers. Only better questions. New episodes every week. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

الحلقات

  1. قبل يومين

    Ep:8 Love, Hierarchy, and the Anarchist Case Against the Couple Form

    The anarchist tradition has spent a lot of time thinking about who controls the workplace, the land, the state. It has spent less time asking the same question about something closer and more uncomfortable: who controls the relationship? Marriage, as a legal form, is not primarily about love. It is about property — inheritance, tax liability, the state's authority to decide which love is real and which families are legitimate. Emma Goldman understood this in her essay Marriage and Love: that the institution takes genuine human longing and organises it into ownership. She refused it her whole life, and privately burned with the jealousy and need that the structures she opposed had built inside her. That gap — between the world we argue for and the people we already are — is the most honest place to argue from. Elizabeth Brake coined the term amatonormativity in 2012 to name the assumption that everyone is better off in an exclusive romantic couple — an assumption that structures law, economics, and inner life, and discriminates against almost everyone whose most important relationships don't fit the script. Andie Nordgren's relationship anarchy manifesto applies anarchist principles directly to intimate life: no ranking of people, no predetermined scripts, relationships designed consciously by the people inside them. This episode also looks beyond the Western anarchist tradition. Across South Asia, West Africa, and Latin America, the nuclear couple has never been the dominant unit of care. The Hausa tradition of reciprocal support names something Kropotkin was arguing — mutual dependence as social foundation — lived in the texture of intimate life without the European theoretical vocabulary. Topics: relationship anarchy, anarchism, amatonormativity, Emma Goldman, Andie Nordgren, Elizabeth Brake, free love, chosen family, care work, nuclear family, joint family, mutual aid, intimate politics, decolonisation. Further reading: — Emma Goldman, Anarchism and Other Essays (1910) — Voltairine de Cleyre, They Who Marry Do Ill (1907) — free at theanarchistlibrary.org — Elizabeth Brake, Minimizing Marriage (2012) — Andie Nordgren, The Short Instructional Manifesto for Relationship Anarchy (2006) — free at theanarchistlibrary.org — Sophie Lewis, Full Surrogacy Now (2019) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    ١٨ د
  2. ٢٩ يونيو

    Ep:7 Queer Liberation Was Never a Legal Project

    Queerness, in the anarchist frame, is not an identity category. It is a political position — the refusal of the compulsory, the normal, the assigned. The refusal to accept that the state should be in the business of certifying which love is real. This episode traces what happened when that refusal became a legal campaign. Stonewall 1969 was a riot led by trans women of colour and homeless queer youth. Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia Rivera built STAR House from a truck in 1970 — a shelter for homeless trans kids, funded by their own sex work, governed horizontally. Rivera was booed at the 1973 gay liberation rally for being too radical. But the American story is only part of it. In India, the hijra community held court authority under the Mughal Empire for centuries — until the British Raj criminalised them with Section 377 in 1860, a colonial law imposed on 42 countries that had no equivalent at home. In Uganda, the laws used to persecute queer people today were introduced by British colonial administrators, not by African tradition. In Brazil, the travesti communities built mutual aid networks and political organisations against state violence decades before the mainstream movement noticed they existed. The laws criminalising queer life across the Global South are not ancient local traditions. They are colonial exports. And the communities that resisted them did so through exactly the practices this show keeps returning to: mutual aid, horizontal organising, building the world you need without asking permission. ACT UP's direct action cut the price of AZT. Bash Back kept asking the question the mainstream movement had stopped asking. The argument has never stopped being made — everywhere, in different forms, for a very long time. Topics: queer anarchism, Stonewall, Marsha P Johnson, Sylvia Rivera, STAR House, ACT UP, marriage equality, Bash Back, Section 377, hijra, colonial law, Brazil, travestis, ASTRAL, food sovereignty, queer liberation, trans rights, decolonisation. Further reading: — Susan Stryker, Transgender History (2008) — Jasbir Puar, Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times (2007) — Lisa Duggan, The Twilight of Equality? (2003) — Enze Han & Joseph O'Mahoney, British Colonialism and the Criminalisation of Homosexuality (2018) — José Esteban Muñoz, Cruising Utopia (2009) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    ٢١ د
  3. ٢٢ يونيو

    Ep: 6 The Women Who Built Anarchism

    Anarchism has a feminist core. Not added later, not bolted on — there from the beginning. This episode is about three women who built the tradition and were largely written out of its history. Emma Goldman: deported from the United States in 1919 after decades of organising, lecturing, and writing, arriving in the Soviet Union expecting a revolution and finding a state. Voltairine de Cleyre: the woman Emma Goldman called the most gifted anarchist America had ever produced, largely unknown today, who coined the term "anarchism without adjectives" and was shot by a former student and declined to press charges. Lucy Parsons: born into slavery around 1851, who helped lead 80,000 workers in the Chicago general strike of 1886, co-founded the Industrial Workers of the World, and whose papers were seized by the Chicago Police Department the day she died. Three women. Three different forms of punishment for the same crime. The punishment is not an accident — it is the argument. Topics: Emma Goldman, Voltairine de Cleyre, Lucy Parsons, anarcha-feminism, anarchism without adjectives, Haymarket, IWW, women in anarchism, radical history, deported. Further reading: — Emma Goldman, Anarchism and Other Essays (1911) — Paul Avrich, An American Anarchist: The Life of Voltairine de Cleyre (1978) — Eugenia C. DeLamotte, ed., Exquisite Rebel: The Essays of Voltairine de Cleyre (2005) — Carolyn Ashbaugh, Lucy Parsons: An American Revolutionary (1976) — Emma Goldman, Living My Life (1931) Tags: anarchism, feminist history, Emma Goldman, Voltairine de Cleyre, Lucy Parsons, anarcha-feminism, radical women, IWW, Haymarket, women's history, political history, anarchist podcast Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    ١٦ د
  4. ١٥ يونيو

    Ep:5 Food, Land, and the Common Table — Part 2: The Seed in the Pavement

    In the United States, you can buy a cheeseburger on almost any corner in South Central Los Angeles. Finding a fresh tomato requires a forty-five-minute drive. That is not geography. That is food apartheid — a term coined by food justice advocate Karen Washington that names the agent rather than naturalising the condition. This episode brings the food sovereignty argument into the cities of the Global North. Liz Christy and the Green Guerillas turning a rubble-filled lot in New York into the first community garden in 1973. Food Not Bombs — founded in 1980, over a thousand arrests in San Francisco for feeding people in public. Ron Finley planting vegetables outside his house in South Central and being cited by the city of Los Angeles for gardening without a permit. The anarchist argument running through all of it: the problem is never scarcity. It is distribution. And the seed in the pavement is already the argument, made in soil. Topics: food apartheid, guerrilla gardening, Food Not Bombs, Karen Washington, Liz Christy, Ron Finley, prefigurative politics, mutual aid, community gardens, direct action. Further reading: — Dean Spade, Mutual Aid: Building Solidarity During This Crisis (and the Next) (2020) — Richard Reynolds, On Guerrilla Gardening (2008) — Robert Gottlieb & Anupama Joshi, Food Justice (2010) — Wendell Berry, Bringing It to the Table (2009) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    ١٧ د
  5. ٨ يونيو

    Ep:4 Food, Land, and the Common Table — Part 1: The Earth Is Not for Sale

    The most fundamental question in anarchist politics is not about the state or the prison. It is about food. Because the question of who controls the means of subsistence — who owns the land, who owns the seed, who decides what gets grown and who gets to eat — is the question underneath every other question. If you cannot feed yourself outside the terms set by someone who owns the earth you stand on, you will accept almost any condition they impose. Hunger is the oldest coercion. Enclosure is the oldest expropriation. This episode centres the Global South, because that is where the argument about food and land has always been fought most clearly and at the greatest cost. The Zapatistas rising on January 1, 1994 — not against the government, but against NAFTA, which they called a death sentence for the milpa, the ancient polyculture Maya communities had cultivated for thousands of years. The Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra in Brazil — the largest social movement in Latin America, which has won land titles for more than 400,000 families through direct occupation since 1979. The Dalit women of Telangana who built community seed banks to break their dependency on landlords and patent-holders. And Gerrard Winstanley and the Diggers of 1649: the earth is a common treasury. The concept that ties it all together: food sovereignty, coined by La Via Campesina at the 1996 World Food Summit in Rome. Topics: food sovereignty, Zapatistas, MST Brazil, seed banks, Deccan Development Society, Winstanley, Diggers, La Via Campesina, enclosure, anarchism, NAFTA, milpa, Silvia Federici. Further reading: — Silvia Federici, Caliban and the Witch (2004) — Gerrard Winstanley, The Law of Freedom and Other Writings (1652, ed. Christopher Hill, 1973) — Raj Patel, Stuffed and Starved (2007) — Leanne Betasamosake Simpson, As We Have Always Done (2017) — La Via Campesina, La Via Campesina: Globalising Hope (2013) Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    ١٧ د

حول

What would it look like to organise the world around care instead of profit? Not as a fantasy. As a serious, uncomfortable, unresolved question. A Thousand Small Fires is a podcast that takes anarchist, feminist, and queer thought seriously — not as a doctrine to follow, but as a lens for asking better questions. About work, food, love, land, the state, the prison, the family, the body. About who decides, on whose terms, and what gets built when people refuse to wait for permission. Each episode is around 15 minutes — long enough to go somewhere real, short enough to earn your attention. The show is philosophical in tone and open in frame. It holds contradictions rather than resolving them. It cites thinkers without hiding behind them. It uses history as evidence rather than as comfort. The anarchist tradition argues that hierarchy — in governments, workplaces, relationships, and intimate life — is not natural or inevitable. It was made, and it can be unmade. This show follows that argument wherever it goes, including into the places the mainstream left doesn't want to look. Topics across Season 1 include: mutual aid and what makes it different from charity; the care labour that the economy runs on and refuses to count; food, land, and the global struggle for food sovereignty; the women who built anarchism and were written out of its history; queer liberation as a refusal, not a request; love, relationship anarchy, and the politics of intimate life; prison abolition; settler colonialism; carceral feminism; and what it means to start building the world you want inside the one that exists. No fixed answers. Only better questions. New episodes every week. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.