Article 13

Faith Matters

Article 13 is a new narrative podcast from Faith Matters that brings together cutting-edge research and spiritual wisdom to offer blueprints for a better world. American society is fractured across political and cultural lines. Healing will not happen quickly or easily, but will require a sustained commitment to peaceful discussion and the development of new, creative frameworks for finding common ground. Hosted by Zachary Davis and featuring deep-dives into vital social issues, extraordinary guests, and beautiful sound design, Article 13 aims to model the kind of hopeful, intelligent discourse our country needs—and to offer ways that each individual listener can start the healing, right where they are. Article 13 is produced by Maria Devlin McNair, Zachary Davis, and Gavin Feller. Music by Steve LaRosa. Art by Charlotte Alba. https://www.faithmatters.org/p/article-13 www.wayfaremagazine.org

Выпуски

  1. Won't You Be My Neighbor?

    15 ЯНВ.

    Won't You Be My Neighbor?

    Community in America has grown harder to find. The spaces and institutions that used to gather neighbors together are in decline, while loneliness, depression, and other social ills are on the rise. As Seth Kaplan and Pete Davis explain, a healthy country is built on healthy relationships, and healthy relationships are built on commitment. Relearning how to commit ourselves to a place and a group of people — especially our neighbors — is one of the best things we can do for ourselves and others. This episode of Article 13 offers practical guidance for how we can make these commitments and first-hand accounts of how joyful it can be when we do. FEATURED VOICES Pete Davis is a writer and civic advocate from Falls Church, Virginia. His Harvard Law School graduation speech, “A Counterculture of Commitment,” has been viewed more than 30 million times — and was recently expanded into a book: Dedicated: The Case for Commitment in An Age of Infinite Browsing. Seth Kaplan is a leading expert on fragile states. He is a Professorial Lecturer in the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS) at Johns Hopkins University, Senior Adviser for the Institute for Integrated Transitions (IFIT), and consultant to multilateral organizations such as the World Bank, U.S. State Department, U.S. Agency for International Development, and OECD as well as developing country governments and NGOs. Karen Washington is a farmer and activist. She is Co-Owner/Farmer at Rise & Root Farm in Chester New York. As an activist and food advocate, in 2010, she co-founded Black Urban Growers (BUGS) an organization supporting growers in both urban and rural settings. In 2012 Ebony magazine voted her one of their 100 most influential African Americans in the country and in 2014 she was the recipient of the James Beard Leadership Award. Karen serves on the boards of the New York Botanical Gardens, Why Hunger, Just Food, and Farm School NYC. LISTEN ON APPLE OR SPOTIFY TRANSCRIPT * Introduction Karen Washington was a physical therapist and a single mom who dreamed of having her own house in the Bronx. She was able to make this dream come true – but it turned into what she called “a nightmare” because of the abandoned lot across from her home. It began filling with garbage, got infested with rats, and became a place where “bad things happened.” But her story turned into a different kind of dream when she saw a neighbor, Jose Lugo. Davis: She told me that my eyes lit up like a Christmas tree and she said, “What are you doing? And he says, “I’m trying to clear the trash to plant a community garden. Do you want to help?” And she said, “Yes, can I help?” This is author Pete Davis, who related Washington’s story in his book Dedicated: The Case for Commitment in an Age of Infinite Browsing. Davis: And what they did is they started organizing the whole neighborhood, they cleared all the trash, they started planting, and suddenly they had a garden with corn and squash and kale and collard beans and cantaloupe. Eventually, they got connected with all the other people doing community gardens all across the city. Washington: Welcome to the Farmer’s Market, the La Familia Farmer’s Market. This is Washington in a ParentEarth feature, describing how the garden became the launching point for a farmer’s market Washington: We sat down, mapped it out, and then got four farmers who were willing to come to our neighborhood and got it started, so now we’re eight years in the making, love our community, community loves us, they wait for July to November to come on Tuesdays. The garden also became Karen Washington’s launching point for new kinds of involvement in her community. Davis: She started asking about the life of different people who are hanging out in the garden. And they said, “Oh, you know, we got this issue at school. We got this issue with hunger.” And then that got her involved in school issues and hunger issues and, How could the garden help with this? Washington: Many families that I’ve talked to, just in passing at the Farmer’s Market, said, ‘You know, my kids were eating candy and cookies, and so when, you know, I started going to the Farmer’s Market and getting my kids involved in community gardening and eating healthy lunches, then I started to see a change and really saw how my children really started to like fresh food versus processed food.’ Karen Washington’s story is beautiful. More than that, it’s a beautiful vision of the kind of life we might wish for ourselves. A life of community. A life of meaningful connection to others, built around common projects and mutual care. Unfortunately, for many Americans, such life in community feels more and more out of reach. Welcome to Article 13, a podcast that brings together cutting edge research and spiritual wisdom to provide blueprints for a better world. I’m your host, Zachary Davis. In this episode, we look at why community is declining in America and why this is partly caused by our own fear. We also take a deeper look at why community matters and how we can help bring our own communities back to life. * The disappearance of community Community was once America’s great strength. When French political scientist Alexis de Tocqueville made his study of America in the 1830s, he was particularly struck by how readily Americans formed associations. These were, he said, “of a thousand different types … religious, moral …. very general and very limited, immensely large and very minute.” “Nothing, in my view,” he wrote, “deserves more attention than the intellectual and moral associations in America.” This drive to associate also showed up for generations in how Americans inhabited their own local communities. Kaplan: So if we’re thinking that America had a pretty healthy society two generations ago and we don’t have a healthy society now, what has changed? This is Seth Kaplan, the author of Fragile Neighborhoods: Repairing American Society One Zip Code at a Time. Kaplan: Until about two generations ago, people were very place-based, where they prayed, where they shopped, where they met people, everything was pretty close. So if you went, let’s say, in the 1950s or even into the 60s, and you went into a street, kids played on the street, parents hang out on their porch, they knew each other, and again it doesn’t mean that they were friends, but they had relationships, they had expectations that each other would be there to support them. I think this was the norm mostly everywhere until recently. “Over the last two generations,” Kaplan wrote for After Babel, “the U.S. has moved from a ‘townshipped’ society in which neighbors regularly communicated and collaborated with each other … to a ‘networked’ and technologically-driven one in which local neighborhoods, schools, churches, and civic organizations are less important, and … have weakened over time.” Two of those key features Kaplan describes – institutions and place-based community – have disappeared. The physical spaces that used to bring Americans together don’t exist the same way. Davis: We’re seeing a decline in what are called third spaces. A third space is a place where you meet in community – a plaza, a park, a library, a cafe, a bar. If we see a decline in those spaces, you’re also going to see a decline in community. Kaplan: I’m thinking, 10-minute drive from where I live, wonderfully nice houses – there’s nothing that connects those people, there’s just roads. Where are the institutions that bring those people together? You drive to church, you drive to school, you drive shopping, your civic engagement is not local, there’s nothing that brings people together. The country has also lost many of the associations, like unions and civic groups, that used to gather people together. Kaplan: And so, when I say fragile neighborhoods, I first and foremost mean places in which relationships are weak, institutions have thinned out or disappeared, and people just live next to each other and they have very little that brings them together. And with nothing bringing us together, it’s no surprise that we aren’t getting together. Between 2003 and 2022, hours of face-to-face socializing declined for American men by 30 percent; for unmarried Americans by over 35 percent; and for teenagers by over 45 percent. As Derek Thompson writes, “there is no statistical record of any other period in U.S. history when people have spent more time on their own.” And in particular, we’re not spending time with the people who share our local space. The Institute for Family Studies reports of recent surveys, “only a quarter of Americans said that they know most of their neighbors … The share of Americans who spend a social evening with a neighbor at least several times per month has declined from 44% in 1974 to 28% in 2022.” Davis: We’ve started seeing community as less of a key part of our life. We think it’s all about what we do with our immediate family, nuclear family, and what we do with our careers, and there’s been a decline in this other huge part of our life, which is our interactions with friends, neighbors, and fellow citizens in community life. And this decline in community has taken a visible toll on American life. Writes Thompson, “solitude, anxiety, and dissatisfaction seem to be rising in lockstep. Surveys show that Americans … have never been more anxious about their own lives or more depressed about the future of the country.” * Why community matters What such data reveals is that community isn’t just one good thing among others. It’s a prerequisite for many, many other vital goods, for both individuals and societies – something Seth Kaplan, as a global analyst, is uniquely positioned to see. Kaplan: My lens for thinking about this question is always the idea that relationships is the sta

    26 мин.
  2. Good News

    13.08.2025

    Good News

    Most of the news we see each day is negative. This constant stream of bad news fuels news avoidance, anxiety, and animosity — all of which harm us at a spiritual level. This episode proposes a new, spiritually healthy way of engaging with the news, looking at how we can use our media diets to help us fulfill our personal vocations and cultivate the virtue of hope. Focusing on news you can act on will improve your mental health and your ability to make positive impacts; as Emma Varvaloucas explains, focusing more on positive news also increases your ability to create positive change because it allows you to see that change is possible and what strategies best advance it. Featured voices: * David Bornstein * Sharon Brous * Jonathan Haidt * Brett McCracken * Kathryn Murdoch * Hannah Ritchie * Chris Stirewalt * Emma Varvaloucas Article 13 is produced by Maria Devlin McNair, Zachary Davis, and Gavin Feller. Music is by Steve LaRosa. Art is by Charlotte Alba. You can learn more about Article 13 here. We express our thanks to the Wheatley Institute for their support. LISTEN ON APPLE PODCASTS LISTEN ON SPOTIFY EPISODE TRANSCRIPT * Introduction It’s 1 AM. You should be asleep. But instead, you’re doomscrolling – swiping through story after story on your social media feeds and news channels, and they all seem to be negative. Democracy is under threat. AI is coming for your job. Children are dying in wars abroad. The climate is about to collapse. This deluge of danger makes you want to do what a lot of people have done – stop reading the news altogether. But then imagine you come across a story like this: Documentary:  Humans are extraordinary. We're such a miracle. The land is resilient. We are resilient. We've got to believe that there's a better way where people have clean air, clean water, available food, cheap, abundant energy. The big shared human projects confronting climate change, staying a step ahead of the next pandemic, preventing nuclear conflict, will require cooperation. That's the key for success, and we are one team, the world. It's ideas that determine our trajectory as a species. The idea that progress is possible is probably one of the most powerful ideas we've ever had. People are building better futures for themselves and the communities around them. Most news stories about our future aren’t nearly so optimistic. But that’s precisely why this story needed to be shared. This footage is from a 2024 PBS docuseries called A Brief History of the Future. At an Aspen Ideas event, Executive Co-producer Kathryn Murdoch explained why she wanted to create it: Murdoch: Of the main reasons I did this project was actually because my daughter came to me a few years ago and said she didn't see any hope for the future. And I was really shocked because I've been working on climate change for like 17 years, and she knows all the solutions that we work on, and and we do democracy reform, she's very familiar with all those things, but she said to me, “But look at the films, look at the television shows, look at the books, especially the YA books. Everything is dystopian.” And I sort of went around trying to prove her wrong, and I couldn't. Everything that we have visualized about our future is dystopian now. Some of it's ecological, but, you know, there's all kinds of choices, there's 27 flavors of dystopia, but there's no version where we actually get things right. A Brief History of the Future offers visions of what it could look to get things right– and how we could get there. Alexis Soloski discusses the docuseries in a New York Times article titled “Climate Doom Is Out. ‘Apocalyptic Optimism’ Is In.” The article discusses recent climate books that are striving, like this docuseries, to replace climate doomerism with a certain kind of informed, well-earned optimism. None of them deny that the problems are real and gravely serious. But they insist that focusing solely on the problems will make us worse at solving them. As data scientist Hannah Ritchie put it, “There’s been a really rapid shift in the narrative, from almost complete denial to, ‘Oh, it’s too late now, there’s nothing we can do, we should just stop trying.’” If the news convinces us that the problems are insurmountable, then we won’t be motivated to do anything about them. That’s why Ritchie, Murdoch, and many others believe we need a different approach to world issues and how they’re reported. And the most practical approach here may, in fact, be one founded on a certain spiritual virtue. Soloski puts it this way: “Intimations of doom have failed to motivate us. Perhaps we will work toward a better future if we trust that one … is possible. When it comes to climate catastrophe, is our best hope hope itself?” Welcome to the Angle – a podcast that brings together cutting edge research and spiritual wisdom to provide blueprints for a better world. I’m your host, Zachary Davis. In this episode, we develop spiritual guidelines for navigating the news – especially the division and negativity the news now fosters. We examine the spiritual stumbling blocks posed by our media environment; we outline a media diet that can help us live out our personal missions; and we explain why we need the virtue of hope – so that what we learn about the world can change the world. * Spiritual formation and dispositions When people tell us why we should read the news, the reasons aren’t usually spiritual ones. It’s to hold people in power accountable, to be well-informed about issues on the ballot. It’s a vital political issue – serious scholars of democracy agree that it needs an informed citizenry. But there are also vital spiritual dimensions to our news-consumption habits. How we get our news affects the way our minds are shaped, the moral dispositions we cultivate towards other people, and our ability to carry out our mission in the world. In their 2023 book The Great Dechurching, pastors Michael Graham and Jim Davis ask why 40 million churchgoing Americans have recently left their churches. In this book, they spent a lot of time looking at how different demographics get their news. That’s because Graham and Davis noticed a relationship between news consumption and spiritual formation – what we fill our minds with, and what our minds are like. A report released by Pew Research Center in 2023 relayed that “half of U.S. adults get news at least sometimes from social media.” It also reported that “Facebook outpaces all other social media sites” in terms of where Americans regularly get their news. But as Graham and Davis note, “Through … leaked internal Facebook corporate memos, we learned, ‘[Facebook] algorithms exploit the human brain’s attraction to divisiveness … If left unchecked,’ Facebook would feed users ‘more and more divisive content to gain more user attention and increase time on the platform.” “We are in a crisis of spiritual formation,” they conclude, “because we live in an attention economy. Attention is money.” And nothing sustains attention like anger. Every proprietary algorithm at all the large tech and social media companies has discovered what the Bible has already told us, Graham and Davis write. We are inherently prone to division, strife, and anger. We consume content that puts our brain in a cortisol state and makes it increasingly difficult to be renewed in our minds and to embody the fruits of the Spirit. But you don’t have to be a pastor to be concerned about media consumption and personal formation. You could be a psychologist. Psychologist Jonathan Haidt, who studies religion and moral psychology, points out that spirituality is a core concept even for those who don’t belong to a religious faith or believe in God. People innately perceive certain kinds of objects and actions to be pure or elevating or sacred in some way, and some others to be disgusting or degrading. A spiritual life, on this account, is one that strives to embrace what is elevating and avoid what is degrading. And Haidt believes that a lot of mainstream media is dangerous for our collective spiritual lives. Haidt: We're drowning in trivia that was created yesterday. This is Haidt speaking with Trinity Forum Haidt: Epictetus says, If your body was turned over to just anyone, you would doubtless take exception. Why aren't you ashamed that you've made your mind vulnerable to anyone who happens to criticize you, so that it automatically becomes confused and upset? I mean, that's Twitter, he said, Don't go on Twitter. And then this is Marcus Aurelius, Marcus Aurelius said, The things you think about determine the quality of your mind; your soul takes on the color of your thoughts; so avoid degrading things, avoid things that lower you, focus, expose yourself to things that elevate you. We might agree that it can be spiritually corrupting to immerse ourselves in outrageous stories about our political enemies, or trivial celebrity gossip, or the videos of real-life violence that show up all over news channels and social media. But could even the most thoughtfully chosen stories feel “elevating,” if so much of the news is simply so bad? * Negativity Varvaloucas: There has actually been research that's been done that counts the number of times negative emotions appear in headlines over the last 15 or so years. And there's been a definite uptick in negative emotions in headlines, meaning anger, fear, disgust – there has been a real change in how the news is presented in recent years. This is Emma Varvaloucas, Executive Director of the Progress Network. Working in journalism herself, she has a close look at this phenomenon of increasing negativity in the news. This negative tone isn’t accidental. Varvaloucas explains that the news is “negative by design”: Varvaloucas: What I meant by the news is negative by design is that it's not designed to tell you what's goin

    27 мин.
  3. A Church Where We Belong

    17.06.2025

    A Church Where We Belong

    For the past several decades, Americans have been leaving Christian churches in record numbers. This phenomenon has been dubbed “The Great Dechurching” by pastors Jim Davis and Michael Graham. What’s surprising is that many of those Americans didn’t leave the church because they stopped believing. They left because their church stopped feeling like a place of belonging. What we need to do to reverse the “Great Dechurching,” argues Jake Meador, is embrace the task of being good friends and good neighbors — a task given to all Christians, but also necessary for all humans. Ryan Burge: Author of The Nones and 20 Myths About Religion and Politics in America. Michael Graham: Co-author of The Great Dechurching with Jim Davis. Works with The Keller Center and The Gospel Coalition. Jen Wilkin: Bible teacher, speaker, and bestselling author advocating for deep Bible literacy. Jim Davis: Co-author of The Great Dechurching, Pastor at Orlando Grace Church. Contributor to The Gospel Coalition. Jake Meador: Writer, editor-in-chief of Mere Orthodoxy. Alan Cooperman: Director of Religion Research at Pew Research Center. Article 13 is a narrative podcast from Faith Matters that brings together cutting-edge research and spiritual wisdom to offer blueprints for a better world. Article 13 is produced by Maria Devlin McNair, Zachary Davis, and Gavin Feller. Music by Steve LaRosa. Art by Charlotte Alba. You can learn more about Article 13 here. Get full access to Wayfare at www.wayfaremagazine.org/subscribe

    26 мин.
  4. For Mankind

    21.05.2025

    For Mankind

    American boys and men are facing growing challenges in school, in the labor force, and in our culture. Richard Reeves, author of Of Boys and Men, documents those challenges and the steps it will take to solve them — which include a new cultural script for masculinity. Many of our cultural spaces are suspicious of masculinity itself; others celebrate only that masculinity which conforms to the traditional model of strength and dominance. This episode proposes that a powerful new script would be one that celebrates the desire for strength as it is used in service to others. Featured voices: * Arthur Brooks * Richard Reeves EPISODE TRANSCRIPT * Introduction Arthur Brooks: I have three kids, 25, 23, and 20, and my middle son is named Carlos. And Carlos was having a good old time in high school, and [] had substantial grade problems and academic issues. But the problem was he wasn't really having fun, and I think it was a meaning problem. This is Harvard professor and social scientist Arthur Brooks, speaking with podcaster Tim Ferriss in 2023. In response to Carlos’s meaning problem, Brooks asked him to come up with a business plan for his life. The plan, in Brooks’ words, was “appropriately unorthodox.” Carlos got a job on an 8,000-acre working wheat farm in Idaho. He dug rocks out of the soil, chopped down dead trees, and ran a combine 16 hours a day. Tim Ferriss: Why did he choose this? How would he explain that? Arthur Brooks: Because he needed to see what he could do. He needed to find out what it meant to be Carlos Brooks, away from his family, away from everybody. Why? Because he was looking for the answers to the questions. They were inchoate. They were like, “Why am I alive? I don’t know. Maybe I’ll find it in the cab of a combine. Maybe I’ll find it when I dig rocks out of the soil. Maybe I’ll find it by doing something hard with my hands.” Then he joined the military. He was 19 years old. He joined the Marine Corps. Today, he’s Corporal Carlos Brooks, Marines Three-Five Scout Sniper Platoon. And he’s got answers … I’ll tell you his answers. “Carlos, why are you alive?” “Because God made me.” “For what are you willing to die?” “For my faith and for my family and for my friends, and for the United States of America.” Boom. These are not the answers that a lot of people watching us would give, but these are super solid answers. I’m super proud of my son because he earned the answers to his meaning questions that everybody watching us has got to earn it. Carlos Brooks isn’t the only young man to have wrestled with questions of meaning. In 2017, the Pew Research Center asked survey respondents where they found meaning in their lives: “What keeps you going, and why?” One analyst said, quote, “One of [Pew’s] most striking discoveries was that women find more meaning in their lives, and from more sources, than men … Right now, men have a narrower range of sources of meaning and identity, which makes them particularly vulnerable if one of those sources is damaged.” That analyst was Richard Reeves, Founder and President of the American Institute for Boys and Men. As a father of three boys, he would hear about their worries and challenges around the dinner table. As a policy analyst, once he started looking into the data, he became more and more worried about the unique problems that boys and men nationwide were facing – especially since not many people were talking about those problems. So Reeves decided to jumpstart the conversation himself. Richard Reeves: So my most recent book is called Of Boys and Men: Why the Modern Male is Struggling and What to Do about It This story of these struggles hasn’t been widely told. But it’s a story we need to hear. Welcome to Article 13– a podcast that brings together cutting-edge research and spiritual wisdom to offer blueprints for a better world. I’m your host, Zachary Davis. Today we’ll look at the particular challenges facing men and boys today and why telling new kinds of stories might offer some new solutions. * What are the problems and what’s causing them? In 2022, Richard Reeves’ published a book called Of Boys and Men. It looks chiefly at how men are performing in education, the workforce, and family life. Data in all three areas indicates that men today are struggling: Richard Reeves: The gender gap in college degrees awarded is wider today than it was in the early 1970s, but in the opposite direction. The wages of most men are lower today than they were in 1979, while women's wages have risen across the board. One in five fathers are not living with their children. In America today, women are 15 points more likely than men to hold a bachelor’s degree. Women’s wages have increased more than 30% since 1983, while men who entered the workforce at that time earn about 10% less in their lifetimes than men who started a generation earlier. One-third of men who hold only a high school diploma are out of the labor force. And these economic struggles impact family struggles, as Reeves described in a conversation with podcast host Coleman Hughes: Richard Reeves: But it's also true that if men are out of work or struggling to earn a decent wage, that makes them much less attractive as marriage prospects or as mate prospects, and so they're less likely to form a family. Men are struggling to complete degrees, to land jobs, and to form stable partnerships. And these challenges, Reeves says, are linked to some other sobering data. Richard Reeves: Men account for almost three out of four deaths of despair from a suicide or an overdose. I mean, these are pretty shocking pieces of information, shocking data points. The data make it clear that boys and men are facing significant problems. So what’s causing the problems? There’s been no shortage of people offering answers. But, Reeves says, these people often claim that men’s problems are problems with men. Richard Reeves: So, from a conservative critic, for example, it might well be, “Well, they're just not masculine enough. They need to be more masculine, more of a breadwinner. They need to man up. They need to be more like their father.” But it's about them. It's about their individual responsibility. Here’s Senator Josh Hawley, for example, speaking with Megyn Kelly. Josh Hawley: My message to men is, “C’mon, this is the time for you to step up, to go out in the adventure of your life ,which is really an adventure of serving, giving, and providing.” Alternatively, some conservatives identify the problem as the culture not letting men man up – as carrying out a “war on masculinity.” This is Tucker Carlson speaking with Laura Ingram on Fox News in 2018. Tucker Carlson: And he’s absolutely right, I mean the Democratic party is anti-masculinity and anti-father, they have to be, that’s their base – and that’s just true. In the U.S. Reeves writes, a third of men of all political persuasions believe that they are discriminated against, and among Republicans, the number is even higher. And there is some truth to that perception. Just think how common the phrase “toxic masculinity” has become. Doug Emhoff: There’s too much toxicity, masculine toxicity, out there. This is Doug Emhoff, husband of Vice-president Kamala Harris, speaking to MSNBC in 2023. Doug Emhoff: We’ve got this trope out there that you’ve gotta be tough and angry and lash out to be strong. I think it’s a problem, and I’m going to use every chance I get to speak out against this toxic masculinity. Richard Reeves: From the left, the problem was that they were too masculine, perhaps they were toxic, and if we could just somehow exercise out that nasty masculinity from them, they'd be okay. Exit polls from the 2024 US presidential election showed that “55 percent of men voted for Trump in 2024, compared to 45 percent of women.” Among Black and Latino voters, the gender gap grew compared to 2020, with more men choosing the Republican candidate. To attribute the gender gap to pure misogyny would be a mistake, Reeves warns: “There is no strong evidence that young men are turning against gender equality. But they have turned away from the left because the left has turned away from them.” Prior to the election, Reeves strove to remind voters that the challenges facing men – especially men of color and working-class men – aren’t reactionary inventions. They are real, and they aren’t being addressed. As Reeves wrote, “The Democrats and progressive institutions have a massive blind spot when it comes to male issues, and this was exposed in the election. At worst, men are seen not as having problems but as being the problem.” Following the election, Reeves called on Democrats to look deeply at the way they speak to men, and called on Republicans to enact policies that will actually help their male voters. Extremists on the right and left often speak as though male problems come down to the choices of individual men. But the reason policy solutions are needed is that these problems aren’t individual; they’re structural. They're about the structure of the education system, the economy and family life. A big reason why boys are falling behind in school is that the current educational system isn’t designed to support boys’ learning styles. Men are struggling in the labor market because large-scale structural changes, like free trade and automation, have vastly reduced the number of blue-collar, traditionally male jobs. And if men are struggling to bring in income, they’re also struggling to fill the role that men have traditionally filled: the primary breadwinner and provider for a family. Richard Reeves: So among all U. S. households, now 40 percent of them have a sole or female or primary breadwinner, female []. These are profound social changes. The central goal of the women's movement in the 1970s was to secure economic inde

    20 мин.
5
из 5
Оценок: 64

Об этом подкасте

Article 13 is a new narrative podcast from Faith Matters that brings together cutting-edge research and spiritual wisdom to offer blueprints for a better world. American society is fractured across political and cultural lines. Healing will not happen quickly or easily, but will require a sustained commitment to peaceful discussion and the development of new, creative frameworks for finding common ground. Hosted by Zachary Davis and featuring deep-dives into vital social issues, extraordinary guests, and beautiful sound design, Article 13 aims to model the kind of hopeful, intelligent discourse our country needs—and to offer ways that each individual listener can start the healing, right where they are. Article 13 is produced by Maria Devlin McNair, Zachary Davis, and Gavin Feller. Music by Steve LaRosa. Art by Charlotte Alba. https://www.faithmatters.org/p/article-13 www.wayfaremagazine.org

Вам может также понравиться