Ask a Pol uaps

Ask a Pol by Matt Laslo

Asking your lawmakers your UAP questions at your US Capitol. www.askapoluaps.com

  1. 1 NGÀY TRƯỚC

    Intel Vice-chair on overclassification: “Bureaucratic protections are outweighing efficiency and transparency"

    Who? Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) — Vice-chair, Senate Intelligence Committee Since killing our paywall, Ask a Pol’s down 25% of revenue from last year. Ask a Pol asks: What ever happened to your and Texas US Sen. John Cornyn’s bipartisan effort to address overclassification? Key Warner: “I forgot about that. We put in legislation. We have a bill,” Sen. Mark Warner exclusively tells Ask a Pol. “All of this area, everybody acknowledges we overclassify, but it never rises to the top. Same thing on security clearance reform. We’re trying to make sure that it’s not so complicated.” Military Industrial Pentagon Why are our military contractors exempt from FOIA — the Freedom of Information Act — when they’re so woven into the identity of today’s Pentagon? “I have no idea,” Warner says. It seems like the Pentagon can hide stuff from Congress by having a contractor deal with it? “That’s a fair question,” Warner says. “I gotta give you [better answer] — that’s the first time it’s [come up]…” Let us know what to ask Congress next! Caught our ear: “Bureaucratic protections are outweighing efficiency and transparency,” Warner tells us. “And, particularly now, with an administration that prides itself on not following the law or being transparent, it makes the problem much worse.” TRANSCRIPT: Sen. Mark Warner (2-5-2026) SCENE: After interviewing another Senator, Ask a Pol’s Matt Laslo is riding an underground Senate tram back to the US Capitol when Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-chair Mark Warner and an aide proceed to enter his tram… Laslo: Oh, you got on the wrong one. Warner sees Laslo and looks a tad nervous. Warner: I’ll just… Laslo: I’ve been looking for you. What ever happened to your guys’ effort — you and [Sen. John] Cornyn — to change classification? To deal with the overclassification problem? Warner: I forgot about that. Laslo: I know. That was, like, what 8 years ago in Congress time? Warner: We put in legislation. Laslo: Yeah? Did you guys have a bill? Warner: We have a bill. Laslo: Oh, really? Warner: Yeah, the bill — the bill, yes. Laslo: What’s that? Warner: It just hasn’t gotten — you know, all of this area, everybody acknowledges we overclassify, but it never rises to the top. Same thing on security clearance reform. We’re trying to make sure that it’s not so complicated. Laslo: Yeah? Warner: You know, people look at clearances, because, you know, it’s already put enough burden in front of — you really want to go work at the CIA when you’ve had rifts and we’ve had, you know, politicization. It’s going to be even harder if it takes two years to get a security clearance. Laslo: Yeah? Warner: So… Laslo: Do you think we’ll never see a standalone debate on that but we might see it tacked on to the NDAA or? Warner: It’s — part of the challenge is, if I can call it, it is a burden to over… Laslo: Yeah. Warner: To get people back from high classification, everybody’s afraid that, “Oh my gosh, will that piece of information that came out bite you” or will somebody get cleared that was inappropriate. Laslo: Yeah? Warner: And I just think, you know, it’s kind of like, bureaucratic protections are outweighing efficiency and transparency. And particularly now, with an administration that prides itself on not following the law or being transparent, it makes the problem much worse. Laslo: It’s a little separate but kind of similar, like, why are our military contractors exempt from FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] when they’re so woven into the identity of today’s Pentagon? Warner: I have no idea — I will… Laslo: Well, it seems like the Pentagon can hide stuff from Congress by having a contractor deal with it? Warner: That’s a fair question. Laslo: Yeah. Warner: I gotta give you [better answer] — that’s the first time it’s [come up]… Laslo: I throw stones at glass houses for a living. I got no answers. A gaggle of reporters greet the Senator. Press corps: Senator Warner… Ask a Pol AI Disclosure: Ask a Pol’s playing around with as many new AI tools as we can, so this small, unfunded startup can compete in today’s new media landscape. (Generative) AI isn’t tomorrow’s tech — it’s yesterday’s, and we’re experimenting in public to stay ahead while always grounding our journalism in real‑world reporting and full, unedited transcripts. About Ask a Pol: We give listeners a front row seat to Congress. Transparency matters, so come inside the Capitol with us! Politicians disappoint. Ask a Pol keeps em honest.  Find us on social media: Substack X Spotify Apple Don’t miss our other Ask a Pol sites!  Ask a Pol politics. Ask a Pol crypto.  Ask a Pol drugs.  Ask a Pol ai.  Ask a Pol uaps.  Find Ask a Pol founder @MattLaslo on social media.  This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.askapoluaps.com/subscribe

    3 phút
  2. 14 THG 2

    New Jersey US Senator: El Paso "needs...answers" FAA’s refused his state after UAP swarms

    Who? Sen. Andy Kim (D-NJ) Ask a Pol asked: So you — New Jersey residents (AskaARCHIVES: Guess we got NJ’s new governor, Mikie Sherrill on the record on the UAP swarms over her state), Senator Cory Booker and local officials back home — never got answers on the “drones” over Jersey, but now we’ve got lasers shooting “drones” out of the sky in El Paso? Key Kim: “I don’t know what is going on right now,” Sen. Andy Kim (D-NJ) tells Ask a Pol. Does this raise more questions for FAA and Pentagon officials? “Look, I’ve been pressing our government writ large in terms of just our ability to detect drones, be able to distinguish them from other aircraft and think through counter-drones. So I’m just only getting the headlines in terms of what we’re hearing. We’ll get some more details.” Say, “Hey!” on YouTube, TikTok or Instagram Caught our ear: “People need to have answers to this,” Kim exclusively tells us. “This type of just, you know, spontaneous announcement — of what, 10-days, you know? — I mean, it was just, however, they managed this was completely wrong. It created a lot of panic.” TRANSCRIPT: Sen. Andy Kim (2-11-2026) SCENE: Ask a Pol’s Matt Laslo hustles to catch up with Senator Andy Kim as he’s rushing to his car after voting on the windy eve at the US Capitol. Matt Laslo: “Wait, Senator Kim!” Laslo’s ducking in and out of Senate-vote traffic. ML: “So you never got answers on the drones over Jersey, but now we got lasers shooting drones out of the sky in El Paso?” Kim laughs. Andy Kim: “I don’t know what is going on right now.” ML: “Does this—does this raise more questions?” AK: “Um, well look, I’ve been pressing this government in terms of, just been pressing our government writ large in terms of just our ability to detect drones, be able to distinguish them from other aircraft and think through counter-drones. So, I, you know, I’m just only getting the headlines in terms of what we’re hearing. We’ll get some more details.” ML: “But what we’re hearing is nuts. Like, so we’re melting these down and, last I heard, Pentagon couldn’t even identify what they were.” AK: “Really?” ML: “In some places.” AK: “I haven’t had a chance—I wasn’t able to see the FAA administrator today.” ML: “You got a day job.” Kim laughs. AK: “But I will say, look, like, people need to have answers to this.” ML: “Yeah.” AK: “And this type of just, you know, spontaneous announcement — of what, 10-days, you know? — I mean, it was just, however, they managed this was completely wrong. It created a lot of panic.” ML: “Yeah?” Kim hops in car, as Laslo chases Senate Intel Vice-chair Mark Warner. Ask a Pol AI Disclosure: Ask a Pol’s playing around with as many new AI tools as we can, so this small, unfunded startup can compete in today’s new media landscape. (generative) AI isn’t tomorrow’s tech — it’s yesterday’s… About Ask a Pol: We give listeners a front row seat to Congress. Transparency matters, so come inside the Capitol with us! Politicians disappoint. Ask a Pol keeps em honest.  Find us on social media: Substack X Spotify Apple Don’t miss our other Ask a Pol sites!  Ask a Pol politics. Ask a Pol crypto.  Ask a Pol drugs.  Ask a Pol ai.  Ask a Pol uaps.  Find Ask a Pol founder @MattLaslo on social media. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.askapoluaps.com/subscribe

    2 phút
  3. 14 THG 2

    CLASSIFIED: Texas Sen. Cornyn’s "seen some” laser tech used in El Paso; mum on specifics

    Who? Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) — Member, Senate Intelligence Committee Ask a Pol asks: Are you satisfied with what you’ve been told by the Trump administration about this week’s El Paso airport fiasco — with the FAA initially shuttering it for 10 days, before reopening it mere hours later — and reports the Pentagon deployed new anti-”drone”laser technology? Key Cornyn: “I’d like to get more information on laser beams. It sounds like there was counter drone activity,” Sen. John Cornyn exclusively tells Ask a Pol. “And FAA didn’t feel like they had enough information about that. So they shut things down, but I’m glad they reopened pretty quickly.” Do you know do the lasers melt it or do they incapacitate its tech? “I think that’s classified,” Cornyn tells us. Join the partay already: Ask a Pol’s crushing it* on YouTube, TikTok & Instagram! *well, about to be crushing it…with a follow from you! Caught our ear: “Drones coming across the border from the cartels are increasing problem,” Cornyn tells us. “Not only in terms of shipping drugs, but also a danger to our border patrol and other agents.” About Ask a Pol: We give listeners a front row seat to Congress. Transparency matters, so come inside the Capitol with us! Politicians disappoint. Ask a Pol keeps em honest.  Find us on social media: Substack X Spotify Apple Don’t miss our other Ask a Pol sites!  Ask a Pol politics. Ask a Pol crypto.  Ask a Pol drugs.  Ask a Pol ai.  Ask a Pol uaps.  Find Ask a Pol founder @MattLaslo on social media.  This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.askapoluaps.com/subscribe

    2 phút
  4. 7 THG 2

    "Why are military contractors exempt from FOIA?" — UAPDA co-author on eminent domain

    Who? Sen. Mike Rounds (R-SD) — Member, Armed Services & Intelligence Committee Ask a Pol asks: In the new Age of Disclosure documentary, you talk about “eminent domain,” which is included in your UAP Disclosure Act with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. Why are military contractors exempt from FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] because they’re so woven into the contemporary Pentagon? Key Rounds: “There is a general discussion about the fact that some of the stuff that they have is proprietary in nature, and we turn around and we buy their services,” Sen. Mike Rounds exclusively tells Ask a Pol UAP. “So if they’ve got something that is proprietary in nature, they’re not necessarily just simply going to give it up to the US government. They’re going to expect us to buy it from them. “We buy their products, but not necessarily the patents that created it in the first place. We’re changing a lot of that right now, by the way.” But it seems like the Pentagon can hide stuff from Congress by having a contractor handle it? “That’s been a discussion for some time,” Rounds says. “But no resolution.” Any plan for your UAP Disclosure Act this year? “I’ll talk with other folks and see where they’re at,” Rounds tells us. “What I’d really like to be able to do would be to have a more permanent solution than what we’ve got today to make it clear that, look, as time goes along and more of the issues might be more available for public review, there’ll be a place so that it could be accurately held and accurately displayed in the future. “I just don’t want to do anything that’s going to impact our ability to keep our really sensitive programs secret — or keep them protected.” Find Ask a Pol on YouTube, TikTok or Instagram! Caught our ear: “We’re changing a lot of that right now…” Ask a Pol’s playing around with as many new AI tools as we can, so this small, unfunded startup can compete in today’s new media landscape. (generative) AI isn’t tomorrow’s tech — it’s yesterday’s… About Ask a Pol: We give listeners a front row seat to Congress. Transparency matters, so come inside the Capitol with us! Politicians disappoint. Ask a Pol keeps em honest.  Find us on social media: Substack X Spotify Apple Don’t miss our other Ask a Pol sites!  Ask a Pol politics. Ask a Pol crypto.  Ask a Pol drugs.  Ask a Pol ai.  Ask a Pol uaps.  Find Ask a Pol founder @MattLaslo on social media.  This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.askapoluaps.com/subscribe

    4 phút
  5. 4 THG 2

    SCOOP: “Stay tuned on that” — bipartisan UAP whistleblower protection bill picking up steam

    Who? Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) — Ranking Member, US House Oversight Committee Ask a Pol asks: Any update on your whistleblower protection bill — are we going to see that move at all? Key Garcia: “I think we will, actually,” Rep. Robert Garcia exclusively tells Ask a Pol UAP. “That’s something that’s actually going to have some bipartisan support, and so, yeah, we’re working on that too. “So actually, stay tuned on that. We’ve done a lot of work. [House Oversight Chair James] Comer has been supportive, obviously, and so we’re excited that we can get something done on that bill sooner than later.” Caught our ear: Do you think we’ll see more UAP whistleblowers if that passes? “I do,” Garcia tells us. “Right now, we have a pretty active whistleblower protection line that the [Oversight Committee] website runs. And we’ve gotten people that reach out to us on the Epstein issue, on DOGE and a variety of topics. And so we encourage folks to contact us through the whistleblower protection line. “But I think that that will actually help and strengthen it, because right now the administration is trying to actually tear down a lot of the protections.” Below find a rough transcript of Ask a Pol’s exclusive interview with Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA), slightly edited for clarity. TRANSCRIPT: Rep. Robert Garcia (2-3-2026) SCENE: After voting on the House floor, Garcia stops on the steps of the US Capitol to answer questions from network camera crews. Once he’s finished, the congressman and his team walk back to his office across the street with Ask a Pol’s Matt Laslo in tow… Matt Laslo: “Any update on your whistleblower protection bill — are we going to see that move at all?” Rep. Robert Garcia: “I think we will, actually. That’s something that’s actually going to have some bipartisan support, and so, yeah, we’re working on that too. So actually, stay tuned on that. We’ve done a lot of work. [House Oversight Chair James] Comer has been, like, supportive, obviously.” Matt Laslo: “Yeah.” Rep. Robert Garcia: “And so we’re excited that we can get something done on that bill sooner than later.” Matt Laslo: “Do you think we’ll see more UAP whistleblowers if that passes?” Rep. Robert Garcia: “I do. And I think, like, right now we have a pretty active whistleblower protection line that the [Oversight] website runs.” Matt Laslo: “Yeah?” Rep. Robert Garcia: “And we’ve gotten people that reach out to us on the Epstein issue, on DOGE and a variety of topics. And so we encourage folks to contact us through the whistleblower protection line.” Matt Laslo: “Yeah.” Rep. Robert Garcia: “But I think that that will actually help and strengthen it, because right now the administration is trying to actually tear down a lot of the protections.” Matt Laslo: “Yeah?” Rep. Robert Garcia: “You know, whether you talk about the Inspectors Generals, the, you know, anything — any sort of auditing or protection of workers or, for a lot of people, the freedom to complain. They keep destroying all the systems.” Matt Laslo: “Yeah?” Rep. Robert Garcia: “So I think strengthening whistleblower protection is important…” They arrive at an entrance to the Cannon House Office Building, and Congressman’s rushing to get to a meeting. Rep. Robert Garcia: “Alright.” Matt Laslo: “Alright. I’ll be watching.” Rep. Robert Garcia: “Okay. Thanks, man.” Aide: “Thanks, Matt.” Matt Laslo: “Appreciate y’all. Have a good one.” About Ask a Pol: We give listeners a front row seat to Congress. Transparency matters, so come inside the Capitol with us! Politicians disappoint. Ask a Pol keeps em honest.  Find us on social media: Substack X Spotify Apple Don’t miss our other Ask a Pol sites!  Ask a Pol politics. Ask a Pol crypto.  Ask a Pol drugs.  Ask a Pol ai.  Ask a Pol uaps.  Find Ask a Pol founder @MattLaslo on social media.  What should we ask lawmakers this week? Let us know! Ask a Pol AI Disclosure: Ask a Pol’s playing around with as many new AI tools as we can, so this small, unfundedstartup can compete in today’s new media landscape. (generative) AI isn’t tomorrow’s tech— it’s yesterday’s… This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.askapoluaps.com/subscribe

    2 phút

Xếp Hạng & Nhận Xét

5
/5
3 Xếp hạng

Giới Thiệu

Asking your lawmakers your UAP questions at your US Capitol. www.askapoluaps.com

Có Thể Bạn Cũng Thích