Bald, Blind, and Buddies

Timothy Cordes and John Boland

Liberal v. conservative, right, left, or libertarian. Join a thoughtful discussion with Timothy Cordes, a blind psychiatrist, and John Boland, a bald alum of the London School of Economics, who don't agree on much, but always agree to serve up their ideas with friendship and humor. ideasfirst.substack.com

  1. News Items that caught our eye or ear

    APR 9

    News Items that caught our eye or ear

    After trivia where Tim gets a sports question right, John Boland and Timothy Cordes launch into quick hits from the news. The Buddies review the Idaho bill limiting bathroom access to one’s biological gender. John comments on the Supreme Court’s recent trend of carving out religious exemptions while the Buddies address the recent SCOTUS decision on Colorado’s ban on “conversion therapy.” Tim connects that ruling to Kristi Noem’s husband’s case and why someone might want to change “gender-related behaviors.” John asserts that the Republican party has given up its claim to the moral high ground. Tim gives an update on China, which in a recent poll was considered mor trustworthy than the U.S. Both consider George Will’s opinion on the recent jury ruling against Meta and YouTube. The buddies highlight how the ubiquity of technology may change the calculus. John’s whack-job has made no compelling case for action in Iran with myriad consequences to follow. Tim’s whack-job is the Board of Regents of the Universities of Wisconsin, who eventually did carry out their threat to fire the system president after our recording time. Let the discovery begin … Buckle up folks, there’s a lot here. Referred to: ‘Conversion Therapy’ and the Constitution - WSJ The sinister verdict in Meta and Google social media addiction case - The Washington Post FBI: Chinese national, two Americans accused of conspiring to smuggle AI tech to China Satellite Photos Show China’s Massive Manmade Island in Disputed Waters - Newsweek Gallup poll finds world views China better than United States | The Star Universities of Wisconsin Board of Regents votes to fire Jay Rothman We would love to hear from you. Send show ideas, comments or questions to IDEASFIRST@SUBSTACK.COM. We’re also tooling up for another exciting season. If you have tweaks or suggestions, let us know. Let’s keep talking. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ideasfirst.substack.com

    38 min
  2. recent legal rulings against Meta and Youtube

    MAR 29

    recent legal rulings against Meta and Youtube

    After trivia, the buddies begin with a re-imagining of A Few Good Men with a tech executive on the stand. They review two key adverse rulings against social media companies in New Mexico and Los Angeles. John asserts the primacy of individual choice and responsibility. Tim points out that there should be a higher standard for children. Tim reviews what addiction is and whether people can be addicted to social media. John points to the new suit against on-line gambling companies, and they speculate about what will happen next and how things could be improved. John’s whack-job spent three years in law school so that he could be fined for using AI to write his brief. Tim’s hero is a proponent of girl’s sport in Minnesota and a proud Gopher fan. Referred to: New Mexico social media lawsuit ends in $375-million verdict against Meta Verdicts against social platforms validate concerns long raised by parents, whistleblowers | AP News Meta had a 17-strike policy for sex trafficking, former safety leader claims | The Verge Broken Code by Jeff Horwitz Attorney Hit with Historic Fine for Citing AI-Generated Cases Meet the Blanket Lady, a Gophers Basketball Superfan Who Blazed Trails for Women’s Hoops - Racket We would love to hear from you. Send comments to IDEASFIRST@SUBSTACK.COM. Let’s keep talking. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ideasfirst.substack.com

    44 min
  3. A Million Ring Doorbells to Watch them all

    FEB 23

    A Million Ring Doorbells to Watch them all

    John Boland and Timothy Cordes address the Ring Doorbell Super Bowl ad, privacy controversy, and fallout. The Buddies begin with NFL trivia and Tim take prides in his “dumb” home. John and Tim discussed how the Ring Doorbell ad was supposed to warm hearts, but it had a chilling effect. Tim reviews history of Ring’s troubles. John explores tradeoffs between convenience and privacy. John uses the Nancy Guthrie case to illustrate how somehow video doorbells retained images from a device that was supposedly “off.” Tim applauds people who are thinking about these privacy-related decisions and making their own choices about whether they can just answer the door. John’s whack-jobs are two Supreme Court justices guilty of partisanship. Tim highlights Sweden as his hero, for putting books back in students’ hands after realizing the catastrophe of screens in classrooms. Referred to: Ring’s Super Bowl ad for dog-tracking cameras stirs controversy Ring’s privacy failures led to spying and harassment through home security cameras | Consumer Advice Security Companies Could Give Video to Police Without Consent - Consumer Reports Ring’s smart doorbell is a cautionary tale for China sourcing | Global Sources Swedish schools said they didn’t need books. Pupils proved them wrong The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains by Nicholas Carr | Goodreads OpenAI considered alerting Canadian police about school shooting suspect months ago | Tumbler Ridge school shooting | The Guardian We would love to hear from you. Send comments, suggestions, or questions to IDEASFIRST@SUBSTAC.COM. The one thing you can do to help the podcast is to share it with someone. Let’s keep talking. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ideasfirst.substack.com

    41 min
  4. Notre Dame picks pro-abortion professor to lead an institute.

    FEB 17

    Notre Dame picks pro-abortion professor to lead an institute.

    John Boland and Timothy Cordes reflect on Valentine’s Day, lessons from Cherion Koshy, our last guest, and ease into trivia. The Buddies review Professor Susan Ostermann’s appointment to lead the Liu Institute for Asia and Asian Studies at the University of Notre Dame, and the objections of Catholic bishops because of her pro-abortion advocacy. The buddies discuss whether Professor Ostermann’s public advocacy matters for her appointment to lead this department and whether it relates to her intellectual expertise. Both question whether a modern university can truly be Catholic. They reflect on President Obama’s controversial visit to campus. John’s whack-job is Pam Bondi for demonstrating “defining deviancy down” in front of Congress. Tim’s heroes are the indispensable puppy raisers who lay the foundations for young dogs to go on to become Seeing Eye dogs. Referred to: Notre Dame Abortion Controversy: Catholic Bishops Speak Out Against Pro-Abortion Appointee | National Review Tamara Kay and Susan Ostermann: How do we regain abortion rights? Take a page out of MADD’s playbook. – Chicago Tribune Data reveal scale of China abortions Every Day Is Sunday: How Jerry Jones, Robert Kraft, and Roger Goodell Turned the NFL into a Cultural & Economic Juggernaut We’d love to hear from you. Send comments, ideas, or questions to IDEASFIRST@SUBSTACK.COM. There is one thing you can do to help the podcast. Please, share it with a friend. Let’s keep talking. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit ideasfirst.substack.com

    39 min
5
out of 5
21 Ratings

About

Liberal v. conservative, right, left, or libertarian. Join a thoughtful discussion with Timothy Cordes, a blind psychiatrist, and John Boland, a bald alum of the London School of Economics, who don't agree on much, but always agree to serve up their ideas with friendship and humor. ideasfirst.substack.com

You Might Also Like