Bourbon and Rum Podcast

Kent and Kyle
  • 5.0 (1)
  • NEWS COMMENTARY
  • UPDATED BIWEEKLY

Civil, across-the-aisle political discussion and analysis you won't hear anywhere else. Brothers Kent and Kyle challenge each other on current events, ethics, and philosophy. They dive into the big systemic challenges facing our society, from global conflict to the intersection of faith and politics, all over a glass of fine bourbon and rum. Tune in for thoughtful debate, unfiltered conversation, and a refreshing break from today's polarized media landscape.

  1. 3D AGO

    The Iran War, Domestic Politics, and Drones

    Duration: 46:46 | Recorded on March 8, 2026 S3E9 – Kent and Kyle examine the opening phase of the Iran conflict, debating whether targeted strikes against Iranian leadership can realistically achieve regime change. The discussion expands to political polarization, controversies surrounding the Epstein files, the Texas Senate race, and the strategic implications of low-cost drone warfare. Featured Spirits Bourbon: W.L. Weller Special Reserve Show Notes / The Opening Phase of the Iran Conflict: The brothers discuss the U.S. military’s early strikes against Iranian leadership and infrastructure. They highlight the unusual strategy of targeting top officials immediately and debate whether such a rapid decapitation approach can meaningfully weaken the regime or produce long-term political change. / Regime Change and Historical Lessons: The hosts compare current events with past U.S. interventions. Kyle notes that Iraq, despite the violence of the post-2003 transition, eventually emerged as a more stable democracy than under Saddam Hussein. Kent questions whether regime change through military force is a legitimate or effective role for the United States. / Partisan Reactions to Foreign Policy: The conversation turns to political tribalism and how partisan loyalty shapes public reactions to military action. Kyle argues that many critics would view the same policy differently if it were executed by their preferred political leader. / The Epstein Files and Public Trust: Kent raises concerns about selective disclosure in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation, suggesting that incomplete transparency fuels suspicion about political figures mentioned in the documents. Kyle speculates that the massive volume of records and long-running political conflicts make the controversy unlikely to ever reach a definitive resolution. / Texas Senate Race Dynamics: Kyle analyzes the Texas Senate runoff between Ken Paxton and John Cornyn following Wesley Hunt’s elimination. He argues that Republican voters may ultimately prioritize electability against Democrat James Talarico over ideological alignment. / The Removal of Secretary Kristi Noem: The hosts evaluate the fall of Secretary Kristi Noem, discussing controversies surrounding immigration enforcement operations and accusations of excessive self-promotion. Kyle argues that immigration enforcement often becomes a political spectacle when it should be led by experienced professionals such as former ICE director Tom Homan. / Drone Warfare and Asymmetric Conflict: Kyle recounts a discussion with a drone industry executive about the growing imbalance between inexpensive attack drones and costly missile defense systems. The hosts compare the phenomenon to asymmetric tactics such as IEDs in Iraq, noting how low-cost technologies can challenge vastly more expensive military systems. Kyle describes drones as the opposite of traditional high-capital warfare dominated by nuclear weapons and advanced aircraft. Cheap, mass-produced drones allow smaller actors to threaten major powers, potentially shifting the global balance of military power. Reference US-Israel war with Iran enters its 12th day (BBC News) Trump fires Homeland Security Secretary Noem after mounting criticism over her leadership (AP News) DAF increases B-21 Raider production capacity to deliver combat capability faster (Airforce) Ukrainian troops share lessons learned from fighting Iran's Shahed drones (YouTube)

    47 min

  2. MAR 5

    Iran Strikes, Regime Change & Sane Alternatives

    Duration: 56:40 | Recorded on February 28, 2026 S3E8 – Today we’re looking at the fallout of the strikes in Iran and the hunt for sane alternatives in a power vacuum, a search that, as we discuss later, hits much closer to home when we look at our own upcoming elections. Featured Spirits Elmer T. Lee Single Barrel Cruzan Aged Dark Rum Show Notes / Strike on Iran & Leadership Decapitation Strategy: Kent and Kyle open with analysis of the reported strike on Iran and claim that senior regime leadership, including Ayatollah Khamenei, may have been killed. They examine the strategic logic of “decapitation” strikes aimed at neutralizing nuclear ambitions and destabilizing authoritarian regimes. The conversation explores whether eliminating top leadership meaningfully weakens Iran’s nuclear program or merely creates a volatile power vacuum. / Regime Change: Opportunity or Chaos? The hosts debate whether removing senior leaders increases the likelihood of internal reform or triggers instability. They discuss the risks inherent in leadership vacuums—“Who’s 41?”—and whether successors would be more moderate or more extreme.  / Iranian Public Opinion & Internal Dissent: Citing polling and protest movements, Kyle argues that the Islamic Republic faces widespread domestic opposition, while Kent questions the reliability of polling in authoritarian regimes. They examine whether US military action strengthens anti-regime sentiment or shifts resentment toward foreign intervention, drawing parallels to post-9/11 reactions in the Middle East. / US–Israel Military Coordination: Kent expresses concern about the optics and implications of joint operations with Israel, distinguishing between defensive backing and coordinated offensive strikes. The discussion references past conflicts, including Desert Storm, and explores regional responses, particularly Saudi Arabia’s shifting posture after missile strikes toward Riyadh and Dubai. / Sunni–Shia Dynamics & Regional Politics: The episode examines Iran’s Shiite identity in contrast to predominantly Sunni neighbors, adding context to regional tensions. The hosts discuss how sectarian divisions influence alliances, regime durability, and prospects for post-conflict governance. / Can Bombing Achieve Political Outcomes? A recurring theme centers on whether airstrikes alone can compel systemic political change. Kent questions whether bombing campaigns can produce lasting reform, while Kyle contends that targeted leadership removal differs from prolonged occupation. Both agree there is little appetite for US boots on the ground. / The Epstein Files & Institutional Distrust: The conversation pivots to domestic politics, focusing on alleged gaps and redactions in the Epstein files. Kent argues that perceived cover-ups, regardless of political affiliation, fuel public distrust more than the underlying allegations. Kyle counters that bureaucratic dysfunction and legal complexity may better explain inconsistencies than grand conspiracy. Both express frustration with institutional transparency. / Political Extremes & the Post-Trump Landscape: Looking ahead, the brothers explore how Trump’s influence may push both parties toward ideological extremes. They question whether moderate candidates can survive primary politics and debate potential future contenders including Marco Rubio, JD Vance, John Fetterman, Rand Paul, and RFK Jr. The discussion highlights tensions between party loyalty, ideological purity, and voter pragmatism. / Incentives, Corruption & Government Reform: In a wide-ranging aside, the hosts propose a provocative thought experiment: dramatically increasing compensation for elected officials in exchange for strict prohibitions on outside income and lobbying influence. Reference Trump's Iran strikes mark his biggest foreign policy gamble (Reuters) Iron Dome (Wikipedia) Joe Rogan Experience #2437 - Rand Paul (YouTube) No Way Out (1987 film) (IMDB)

    57 min

  3. FEB 26

    Supreme Court, Tariffs & Executive Authority

    Duration: 55:29 | Recorded on February 21, 2026 S3E7 – A deep dive into the Supreme Court’s ruling limiting presidential tariff powers, the future of U.S. trade policy, executive authority, and the political firestorm surrounding the Epstein files. Featured Spirits Old Forester Single Barrel  Pusser’s Rum Show Notes / Supreme Court Blocks Use of Emergency Powers for Tariffs: Kent and Kyle open with analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision restricting the president’s use of the International Emergency Powers Act (IEPA) to impose tariffs. They explore the constitutional implications around separation of powers, emphasizing Congress’s authority over revenue measures. While both agree the ruling reinforces institutional checks and balances, they diverge sharply on whether the episode reflects systemic resilience or deeper instability. / Executive Overreach vs. Institutional Guardrails: The conversation moves to broader concerns about presidential power, January 6th, and rhetoric surrounding “rule by decree.” Kent argues that Trump’s behavior reflects overt hostility toward institutional limits, while Kyle counters that the system functioned as designed—courts intervened and recalibrated executive authority.  / The Economics of Tariffs: Drawing on Wall Street Journal reporting, the hosts debate whether tariffs primarily burden American consumers or function as leverage in global trade negotiations. Kent outlines a macroeconomic view of tariffs as blunt price distortions layered onto supply and demand equilibrium. Kyle argues that unpredictability can serve as a strategic advantage in negotiations, even if implementation appears crude. / Unpredictability as Strategy: A spirited exchange examines whether presidential volatility strengthens or weakens U.S. leverage. Kent contends that policy swings based on personal grievances undermine market stability and business confidence. Kyle suggests that strategic unpredictability—echoing Nixon’s “madman theory”—can yield diplomatic benefits.  / Congressional Dysfunction and the Epstein Files: The discussion pivots to bipartisan frustration over the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Both hosts question why, despite overwhelming congressional support for disclosure, meaningful prosecutions remain limited.  / Media Incentives and the Trump Brand: The episode closes with reflections on political branding and media dynamics. Kent argues that Trump thrives equally on praise and criticism, benefiting from constant media attention. Kyle suggests that ignoring rather than amplifying such figures may be a more effective long-term strategy. They conclude with predictions that tariffs—though constrained—are likely to remain a durable feature of U.S. trade policy. Reference Supreme Court Rules Against Tariffs Imposed Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) (congress.gov) Do Tariffs Cause Inflation? New Studies Offer Surprising Answer (Wall Street Journal) How Marco Rubio Went from “Little Marco” to Trump’s Foreign-Policy Enabler (The New Yorker)

    55 min

  4. FEB 19

    What is Americanization: Ideals, Interests, and Global Realities

    Duration: 46:43 | Recorded on February 15, 2026 S3E6 – A wide-ranging discussion on Americanization, Saudi Arabia’s transformation, democratic peace theory, and whether U.S. foreign policy prioritizes human rights or strategic self-interest. Featured Spirits E.H. Taylor, Jr. Ron Carúpano (Venezuela) Show Notes / Saudi Arabia in Transition: Kyle reflects on recent travel to Riyadh and contrasts Saudi Arabia’s rapid infrastructure development with its deeply rooted cultural norms. From Vision 2030-style megaprojects and sprawling urban expansion to the social dynamics of public transport and daily calls to prayer, the conversation explores what modernization does—and does not—change.  / What Does “Americanization” Really Mean? Building on travel experiences in Europe and the Middle East, the brothers unpack the idea of global Americanization. Is it the spread of brands like Coca-Cola and Wingstop, the dominance of Hollywood and music, or the export of democratic values? They argue that while American consumer culture travels easily, democratic norms and human rights are far harder to transplant, suggesting that cultural exports and political influence are not the same phenomenon. / Democracy vs. Stability: What Does the U.S. Actually Want? A central tension emerges: Does the United States truly prioritize democracy abroad, or does it prioritize governments that are cooperative and strategically aligned? Using Saudi Arabia, Iran, Israel, and historical U.S. involvement in South America as case studies, Kent and Kyle explore whether American foreign policy is driven by ideals or pragmatism. / Democratic Peace Theory and Historical Reality: The discussion turns to democratic peace theory, the idea that mature democracies rarely go to war with one another. From World War II to the Falklands and lesser-known conflicts like the Cod Wars, the hosts examine whether democracies are inherently more peaceful or simply constrained by internal accountability. Would expanding democracy globally would reduce conflict, or simply create new forms of disagreement? / Can Democracy Be “Given”? Reflecting on U.S. efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan, the conversation addresses whether democracy can be externally imposed or must be internally claimed to endure. Kent and Kyle suggest that legitimacy, cultural foundations, and institutional maturity may matter more than constitutional design. They consider whether societies structured around collective identity can—or would want to—embrace strongly individualistic democratic norms. / Culture, Religion, and Political Systems: The hosts explore the interplay between Islam, colonial-era borders, and governance structures in the Middle East. They discuss whether Western-style democracy is culturally transferable and whether historical interventions by Britain, France, and the U.S. have complicated the region’s political development. The conversation acknowledges the complexity of comparing societies from within one’s own cultural frame of reference. / Realism, Idealism, and American Exceptionalism: The episode closes with a broader philosophical reflection: Is the U.S. committed to spreading democratic values, or to securing favorable geopolitical conditions? Kent and Kyle revisit the Bush-era doctrine that “all people want to be free” and weigh it against a more restrained, realist foreign policy.  Reference Vision 2030 (Saudi Arabia) – National transformation and infrastructure initiative associated with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman Democratic Peace Theory (EBSCO) – International relations theory arguing that mature democracies rarely go to war with one another The Cod Wars explained: The conflict between Iceland and Britain (www.iwm.org.uk) – Series of fishing rights disputes between Iceland and the United Kingdom (1950s–1970s) Bourbon & Rum Podcast (bourbonandrumpodcast.com) – Official website referenced for listener engagement and show notes

    47 min

  5. FEB 5

    Epstein Files, Markets, AI, and Immigration

    Duration: 46:18 | Recorded on February 1, 2026 S3E5 – A wide-ranging discussion on the release of millions of Epstein-related court documents, institutional failure and elite accountability, Federal Reserve leadership and interest rates, AI’s impact on work and education, and the evolving politics of immigration enforcement. Featured Spirits Bourbon: Stagg Jr  Rum: Santa Teresa 1796 Show Notes / The Epstein Document Release: Kent and Kyle examine the release of roughly three million Epstein-related documents and why the sheer volume feels both shocking and unsatisfying. They discuss how most of the material consists of emails, clippings, and court records rather than clear “smoking guns,” reinforcing a sense that elite misconduct is exposed yet rarely punished. The conversation centers on how normal, even casual correspondence among powerful figures becomes disturbing in hindsight, given what is now known. / Credibility Gaps: The brothers explore theories around Epstein’s alleged intelligence connections, referencing speculation involving foreign and domestic agencies. Rather than endorsing a single explanation, they focus on why prolonged secrecy, resistance to disclosure, and bureaucratic delays fuel public distrust.  / Accountability and Exposure: A recurring theme is whether public embarrassment has any real corrective power when prosecution appears unlikely. The hosts argue that the Epstein revelations mainly expose how normalized predatory behavior became within elite circles, echoing patterns seen in cases like Harvey Weinstein. / Federal Reserve Leadership, Interest Rates, and Inflation Signals: Turning to economic news, Kent and Kyle discuss the market reaction to a potential Fed chair nomination and why gold and silver prices dropped sharply. They unpack the tension between political pressure to lower interest rates and the Fed’s mandate to control inflation.  / Tariffs, Economic Resilience, and Sector Imbalances: The hosts assess why dire predictions about tariffs have not fully materialized, noting steady GDP growth, controlled inflation, and solid employment. They argue the bigger issue is policy volatility rather than tariffs themselves, which complicates planning for businesses.  / AI and the Future of Expertise: Kent and Kyle reflect on AI’s impact on white-collar work, drawing parallels to earlier technological shifts like spreadsheets. Rather than eliminating professions, they argue AI raises the premium on judgment, originality, and domain expertise. / Immigration Enforcement and Political Incentives: In the final segment, Kent and Kyle address immigration enforcement, focusing on deportations of individuals with existing orders versus broader crackdowns. They criticize both performative enforcement designed to provoke backlash and political actors who inflame protests for leverage. While agreeing on the need to enforce the law, they argue for a more coherent system that aligns economic needs, fairness, and long-term policy clarity. Reference Department of Justice Publishes 3.5 Million Responsive Pages in Compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act (Department of Justice) Epstein discusses jail time in newly released video with Steve Bannon (MS Now) Richard Branson distances himself from ‘abhorrent’ Epstein after their emails appear in new DOJ document dump (The Independent)

    46 min

  6. JAN 29

    Power, Protest, and Trust in a Fractured Democracy

    Duration: 56:22 | Recorded on January 25, 2026 S3E4 – A measured, in-depth conversation on immigration enforcement, protest, and political trust, centered on the fatal ICE-related shooting of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis. Featured Spirits Elmer T. Lee Single Barrel Bourbon Cruzan Blackstrap Rum Show Notes / The Minneapolis Shooting: Both hosts reflect on their initial reactions to early media reports, including claims that the victim was armed. Kent explains why later video evidence undermined those claims, while Kyle emphasizes situational risk when armed law enforcement and civilians intersect.  / Protest as Patriotism vs. Protest as Risk: Kent’s take: protest is a foundational democratic act and often the last available lever when institutional channels fail. Kyle does not dispute the right to protest but stresses prudence, especially when protests intersect with armed federal agents executing warrants. Should moral legitimacy override personal safety considerations?  / Selective Enforcement and Political Provocation: A major fault line emerges around ICE’s deployment strategy. Kent contends that Minnesota was deliberately targeted as a political provocation, citing agent concentration and comparative deportation rates with states like Texas. Kyle counters that lack of local cooperation necessitates heavier federal presence, framing the issue as operational rather than partisan—even while acknowledging optics matter. / Trust, Transparency, and Official Narratives: The conversation turns to credibility, particularly after officials made statements later contradicted by video evidence. Kent argues that misinformation erodes trust not just in individuals but in institutions, making peaceful compliance less likely.  / Federal Authority vs. Local Consent: Kent questions whether federal enforcement should adapt tactics when operating in communities that are openly hostile to its presence, likening it to policing in historically tense neighborhoods. Kyle warns that conditioning enforcement on local approval risks undermining the rule of law.  / Weaponization of Government—Now and Then: Do current events reflect a deeper pattern of government weaponization? Kent sees the present moment as uniquely dangerous, while Kyle points to earlier examples—Trump prosecutions, COVID-era censorship pressures—as evidence that the problem is bipartisan and longstanding.  / NATO, Defense Spending, and Strategic Drift: The episode briefly widens to foreign policy, with discussion of NATO burden-sharing, U.S. troop deployments in Europe, and whether increased allied spending should translate into reduced U.S. defense budgets. Both argue current military spending fails to reflect modern warfare realities, especially in light of drone use in Ukraine. / Polarization, Media Saturation, and Historical Perspective: In closing, the hosts compare the current moment to the late 1960s and early 1970s, noting that today’s fragmentation is intensified by algorithmic media and constant exposure. Kent reflects on whether greater awareness fuels despair, while Kyle suggests that information overload amplifies conflict without necessarily worsening underlying conditions.  Reference The man killed by a US Border Patrol officer in Minneapolis was an ICU nurse, family says (AP News) The NRA unequivocally believes that all law-abiding citizens have a right to keep and bear arms anywhere they have a legal right to be. (x.com) Rutte says Europe cannot defend itself without the US: 'Keep on dreaming' | REUTERS (YouTube)

    56 min

  7. JAN 22

    Security, Protest, and the Battle Over Public Trust

    Duration: 45:08 | Recorded on January 18, 2026 S3E3 – A difficult discussion on U.S. immigration enforcement, political rhetoric, and institutional trust, using recent ICE activity in Minnesota and Trump-era communication strategies as a lens for examining polarization, governance, and civil society. Featured Spirits Old Forester Single Barrel Barrel Strength Bourbon Rivers Rum  Show Notes / Greenland, Geopolitics, and Presidential Style: The episode centers on recent headlines around Greenland, examining whether U.S. strategic interest justifies aggressive rhetoric or unconventional negotiation tactics. Kent questions whether antagonistic posturing toward Denmark and Greenland advances national security goals, while Kyle frames it as consistent with Trump’s negotiation style.  / ICE, Minnesota, and Selective Enforcement: The brothers dive into the controversy surrounding ICE operations in Minnesota, debating whether enforcement actions are routine or politically targeted. Kent argues that Minnesota was chosen deliberately to provoke backlash in a Democratic stronghold, while Kyle maintains ICE is operating nationwide and reacting to local resistance and rhetoric.  / Rhetoric, Responsibility, and Dehumanization: A central theme emerges around language—specifically whether inflammatory rhetoric undermines otherwise defensible policy goals. Kent stresses that border security and deportation can be supported without vilifying immigrants, warning that dehumanizing language corrodes public trust and legitimizes racism. Kyle counters that repeated references to crime reflect security concerns rather than racial intent, arguing Trump’s blunt communication style lacks nuance but not necessarily malice. / Weaponization of Government Power: Both hosts reflect on the long-term risks of normalizing the use of government institutions as political weapons. Kent warns that precedents set today may be used against different constituencies under future administrations, while Kyle notes similar dynamics during prior Democratic administrations, including censorship and politicized prosecutions.  / Protest, Policing, and Personal Risk: The conversation turns personal as Kent discusses civil disobedience, protest, and the moral calculus of resisting ICE actions. Kyle emphasizes practical caution, arguing that confrontations with armed law enforcement carry predictable risks regardless of intent. This exchange grounds abstract political debate in real-world consequences for individuals and families. / Finding Common Ground Amid Polarization: Despite sustained disagreement, Kent and Kyle repeatedly affirm mutual respect, noting that productive debate requires good faith and intellectual honesty. They explore potential pragmatic solutions—such as legal pathways for long-term undocumented workers—and acknowledge economic realities tied to immigration. The episode closes with a shared recognition that complexity, not slogans, defines the issue. Reference Family and neighbors mourn woman who was shot by ICE agent and made Minneapolis home (AP News) Minn. officials, including Walz and Frey, accused of hindering ICE, served with grand jury subpoenas by FBI (New York Post) Trump steps back from the brink on Greenland. But the damage has been done. (Politico)

    45 min

  8. JAN 15

    Free Speech, Censorship, and the Power of the Political Brand

    Duration: 54:42 | Recorded on December 27, 2025 S3E2 – A candid conversation on free speech, censorship, political power, and media accountability, sparked by EU digital speech laws and U.S. travel bans, and expanding into Trump, media lawsuits, and the rise of politics as brand warfare. Featured Spirits Sazerac Rye Full Proof Bolivar Rum Show Notes / EU Digital Services Act and U.S. Travel Bans: The episode’s core topic begins with an article about the Trump administration imposing travel bans on several European free-speech and disinformation regulators tied to the EU’s Digital Services Act. Kent and Kyle unpack who these individuals are, what their organizations do, and why the U.S. sees these efforts as threats to free speech rather than protections against online harm. / Where to Draw the Line on Free Speech: Kent outlines his position as a free-speech absolutist, questioning who gets to define “hate speech” and warning about government overreach. The discussion explores Europe’s stricter speech laws, mass arrests over social media posts, and whether combating bad ideas requires censorship—or more speech and open debate instead. / Anonymity, Accountability, and Online Speech: The conversation turns to whether anonymous speech undermines accountability in the digital age. Kent argues that free speech may require ownership and responsibility, while Kyle counters with concerns about anonymity protecting dissenters in authoritarian regimes. Together, they examine the tension between safety, responsibility, and expression online. / Trump, Media Lawsuits, and Allegations of Censorship: The episode expands into a heated debate over Trump’s lawsuits against media organizations, whether they represent legitimate accountability or personal corruption, and how they differ from government censorship. Kent defends lawsuits as a lawful remedy, while Kyle argues that presidential immunity combined with personal lawsuits creates a dangerous imbalance of power. / January 6, Media Editing, and Competing Narratives: Kent and Kyle clash over interpretations of January 6, media framing, and selective editing of political speech. They debate whether lawsuits are an appropriate check on misinformation or whether they chill free expression, highlighting how facts, editing, and narrative framing shape public perception. / Politics as Brand, Not Ideas: The discussion shifts to the idea that modern politics is driven more by branding than policy. Kyle argues that Trump has mastered the concept that all publicity—positive or negative—strengthens the brand, while Kent laments what that says about the health of democracy and voter decision-making. / Can Democracy Escape the Trump Gravity?: As the episode winds down, the hosts reflect on whether either party can move past Trump’s dominance of political discourse. They explore whether ignoring him, building a stronger opposing brand, or changing media dynamics is the only way forward, ending on a mix of humor, frustration, and reluctant realism. Reference The Digital Services Act (digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu) U.S. Bars 5 European Tech Regulators and Researchers (New York Times) UK free speech struggle 30 arrests a day censorship (New York Post) Watch the Trump edit that BBC bosses resigned over (YouTube) Timeline: Trump's fights with media, including Jimmy Kimmel (AP News) Sell the Brand First: How to Sell Your Brand and Create Lasting Customer Loyalty By Dan Stiff (Amazon)

    55 min
See All (61)

About

Civil, across-the-aisle political discussion and analysis you won't hear anywhere else. Brothers Kent and Kyle challenge each other on current events, ethics, and philosophy. They dive into the big systemic challenges facing our society, from global conflict to the intersection of faith and politics, all over a glass of fine bourbon and rum. Tune in for thoughtful debate, unfiltered conversation, and a refreshing break from today's polarized media landscape.

Information

  • Creator
    Kent and Kyle
  • Years Active
    2024 - 2026
  • Episodes
    61
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © Kent and Kyle
  • Show Website
    Bourbon and Rum Podcast