Cascade CounterPoint

Cascade Policy Institute
  • ٤٫٦ (٩)
  • سياسة
  • يتم التحديث أسبوعيًا

Sit back and listen to Cascade Policy Institute explain the latest research on Oregon's important issues. Cascade advances public policy ideas that foster individual liberty, personal responsibility, and market-based economic opportunity. Visit us at www.cascadepolicy.org

  1. ٢٦ يونيو

    QP We Can't Afford Metro's Affordable Housing

    Metro promised voters affordable housing. Instead, its 2018 housing bond has produced some of the least affordable subsidized units in Oregon history. Why? Metro insisted on funding almost exclusively three to six story buildings—projects that require elevators, oversized common areas, and far more concrete and steel than low rise construction. Those choices alone drove costs up by 50 percent per livable square foot. One project in Hollywood, an 11-story tower, cost nearly double that. Metro also limited development to nonprofit builders. That sounds frugal, but it isn’t. Nonprofits typically take about 12 percent in developer fees, then they hire the same for profit contractors who build market rate housing. Studies show that nonprofit led projects cost about 20 percent more per square foot than for profit ones. The result? Metro’s subsidized units average $490,000 per apartment—for just 700 square feet. That’s roughly $700 per square foot, two to three times the cost of building a single-family home. And the damage doesn’t stop there. These projects pull scarce construction labor away from market housing, driving prices up for everyone else. Meanwhile, property taxes used to repay the bond make homeownership even harder for working families. Metro says it’s solving an affordability crisis. In reality, its density first policies helped create it—and its housing program is making it worse. We can’t afford Metro’s affordable housing. Read the report at cascadepolicy.org. I’m Naomi Inman.

    **ASE.Web.Podcasts.Duration.Minute.two**

  2. ٢٢ يونيو

    QP IP28’s Radical Attempt to Kill Oregon’s Way of Life

    Hunting, fishing, farming, and ranching have been a way of life in Oregon for thousands of years — from Native American stewardship to the 35,000 farms and ranches operating here today. But a small group of initiative petitioners is now gathering signatures for IP28, a measure that would criminalize that way of life — and the economic activity it supports — solely in Oregon. Hunting is legal in all 50 states. IP28 would make Oregon the first state in the nation to outlaw hunting, fishing, and ranching by redefining these long-standing practices as “animal cruelty.” Under their so called “PEACE Act,” even removing invasive species would be banned. The impact on four million Oregonians — their livelihoods, traditions, and economic stability — seems irrelevant to this coalition. Consider the economic fallout. Oregon’s 34 million acres of public land open to hunting and fishing would no longer generate revenue. Add up licensing dollars, recreation spending, related jobs, commercial fishing profits, and livestock exports, and the loss exceeds $4 billion a year. That’s not just a rural problem — those shockwaves would hit every corner of the state. At its core, IP28 is driven by a moral rights philosophy that claims killing animals is inherently wrong — that human and animal life are morally equivalent. Its petitioners call themselves “species egalitarians.” But in the real world, human beings are of inestimable worth. And farming, ranching, fishing, and animal husbandry are the bedrock of civilizations, economies, and ecosystems. These are the liberties that sustain a free and flourishing society — and like all important freedoms, they must be fought for and defended. Tell your friends the truth about IP28. For Cascade Policy Institute, I’m Naomi Inman.

    **ASE.Web.Podcasts.Duration.Minute.two**

  3. ١٢ يونيو

    QP PPS’ Failed Equity Policy: No Evidence, No Results

    PPS briefly revisited its Racial Educational Equity Policy — and once again, the contradictions are hard to ignore. As Cascade president John Charles noted in his letter to the board, the District’s Equity Funding Policy has been in place for more than ten years, yet PPS has never shown whether it improves student achievement. Despite that, the Board continues to insist on “equal outcomes” for all students — a goal no school district can deliver because the premise itself is flawed. Parents know this. Teachers know this. You can offer equal opportunities, but you cannot guarantee identical results. PPS controls instruction, not the untold variables that shape achievement. Declaring achievement gaps “unacceptable” simply guarantees that staff will always be branded as failures for an impossible metric. Even more troubling, the policy treats unequal outcomes as proof of discrimination — without providing evidence. When asked for documentation of systemic bias, PPS produced nothing beyond generic national reports from activist groups. Meanwhile, the District faces a federal civil rights lawsuit and still hasn’t evaluated its own equity programs. And the policy goes further, claiming adults — not students — are responsible for all disparities. That erases student agency and ignores factors like family structure, effort, strong teaching, and disciplined classrooms. When a policy can’t be implemented, measured, or defended, it should be repealed or rewritten. For Cascade Policy Institute, I'm Naomi Inman. www.cascadepolicy.org

    **ASE.Web.Podcasts.Duration.Minute.two**

  4. ٢ يونيو

    QP The False Promise of Portland's "All Electric" High Schools

    Portland Public Schools threw itself a party last week to celebrate breaking ground on the new $460 million dollar Jefferson High School. And The Oregonian dutifully repeated the talking point that the building would be “all electric powered.” Sounds impressive… until you look at the details. Because PPS quietly admitted—right before the ceremony—that the school won’t be all electric. Science labs still need natural gas for Bunsen burners. State law still requires diesel backup generators. And the other two high school rebuilds, Cleveland and Ida B. Wells, are in the same boat. So the “all electric” label is more marketing than engineering. But even if PPS could pull it off, it wouldn’t change emissions. More than half the natural gas used in Oregon is burned to make electricity. So removing gas lines from the school just means the same gas gets burned somewhere else. Meanwhile, wind and solar provided only about eleven percent of Oregon’s electricity last year. Fossil fuels provided at least thirty eight percent. The grid isn’t magic. What is real is the cost. PPS’s own consultant warned that all electric construction would add at least ten million dollars per school. And when Cascade asked the district for documentation on those added costs, PPS gave us nothing. New York’s governor just backed away from its own climate mandate after projecting thousands of dollars in new annual energy costs per family. That’s the future PPS is pretending not to see. It’s not too late for the board to stop chasing slogans and redirect thirty million dollars toward improvements that actually help students. For Cascade Policy Institute, I’m Naomi Inman. Read more at www.cascadepolicy.org

    **ASE.Web.Podcasts.Duration.Minute.two**

  5. ٢٢ مايو

    QP New York Says Yes to Scholarships--Oregon Should Too

    New York Governor Kathy Hochul announced her intent this month to opt into the new Federal Scholarship Tax Credit—also known as the Education Freedom Tax Credit. That makes her the 30th governor to signal support, and the second Democrat to do so, after Jared Polis of Colorado. Congress created this tax credit last year as the first federal program designed to expand K–12 educational choice nationwide. Beginning in 2027 all taxpayers can take up to $1,700 in federal tax credits for donations to qualified scholarship granting organizations. The U.S. Treasury and Department of Education estimate the program could generate $24 billion in new education funding every year. That’s enough to fund private school tuition for tens of thousands of students—or tutoring for hundreds of thousands more. But here’s the catch: children only benefit if their governor opts in. And Oregon’s Governor Kotek, has declined. Last summer she said that she did not intend to participate. More recently, saying that she’s waiting for final federal regulations. Whether Oregon opts in or not, Oregonians can still take the tax credit by donating to scholarship nonprofits in other states. If Oregon stays out, however, those dollars will support students elsewhere, not here at home. Opting in won’t cost Oregon’s budget a dime and it doesn’t impact public school funding. It simply allows Oregonians to direct private charitable dollars towards scholarships for Oregon’s kids. Thirty states have already said yes. Oregon should, too. For Cascade Policy Institute, I’m Naomi Inman. Learn more at www.cascadepolicy.org

    **ASE.Web.Podcasts.Duration.Minute.two**

  6. ١٤ مايو

    QP Defeating M120 is a Win for the Oregon System

    It’s election time! And the Oregonian editorial board sent a bouquet of sorts to our friends at “No Tax Oregon” when they recommended a “no” vote on Measure 120—Oregon’s $4 billion transportation tax. “The O” urged voters to “drive a stake through the heart of this cursed transportation package.” Which was music to the ears of a quarter-million volunteers who signed the “No Gas Tax” petition in a historic 38 days. The real story here is that Oregon voters get to vote at all on the tax hike—thanks to a pioneering form of democracy dubbed the “Oregon System”—giving voters the right to challenge Salem’s laws and put them on a statewide ballot. In the recent short session, however, lawmakers didn’t exactly celebrate that tradition. Instead, the Governor and union-backed legislators showed their disdain for these volunteers by moving the vote to May and suppressing their voice in the voters’ pamphlet. Those tactics only energized voters, raised the measure’s profile, and ensured its defeat. Lawmakers also managed to spark a new petition drive by passing a claw back of over $300 million in federal tax cuts for small business owners. That bill triggered the reflexive muscle of the same Oregon voters, who must again collect 100,000 signatures by June first. Defeating Measure 120 isn’t just a policy victory. It’s a win for the Oregon System. Read more at www.cascadepolicy.org

    **ASE.Web.Podcasts.Duration.Minute.two**

  7. ٨ مايو

    QP Oregon Metro's War on Cars

    Metro is rolling out new strategies and transit plans in what looks more and more like a war on cars — and Cascade is calling out the baseless evidence they’ve leaned on for thirty five years. At an April council meeting, Cascade President John Charles delivered pointed testimony against two major actions designed to prioritize transit while punishing people who rely on their cars. At that meeting, Metro approved its Transportation Demand Management Strategy and pushed forward the gridlocking 82nd Avenue Transit Project — a plan that would dedicate miles of existing car lanes to buses only. Charles reminded councilors that Metro has been trying to engineer travel behavior since the early nineties, yet reductions in vehicle miles traveled have never materialized. Metro’s own performance measures show the 30 year goals weren’t met, so instead of rethinking the strategy, they stretched the timeline to 45 years and kept building plans on the same fantasy metrics. As Charles emphasized, driving isn’t a luxury — it’s a necessity. It’s central to employment, wage growth, childcare, and basic mobility. Yet Metro keeps doubling down on failed strategies that make driving harder and daily life more expensive. After decades of missed targets, the region deserves transportation investments grounded in reality, not wishful thinking — investments that actually improve mobility and economic opportunity for real people. For Cascade Policy Institute, I’m Naomi Inman. Read the full story at Cascade Questions Evidence Behind Metro’s War on Cars - Cascade Policy Institute

    **ASE.Web.Podcasts.Duration.Minute.two**

  8. ٤ مايو

    QP The $60 Million Question: Where Did the CBSE Go?

    Portland Public Schools has a $60 million question on its hands: What happened to the Center for Black Student Excellence voters approved in 2020? That project was written directly into the bond language. Voters were told their money would build a dedicated center focused on Black student achievement. But today, that center has effectively disappeared. In testimony to the Bond Accountability Committee, Cascade President John Charles warned that PPS is attempting a quiet bait and switch. The district has renamed the project the Grice Adair Center for Educational Excellence—a name that never appeared on the ballot—and the original CBSE no longer shows up in the new bond update. The district’s website now redirects CBSE searches to a “Website Under Construction” page, with old documents scrubbed away. Why the sudden erasure? After a civil rights complaint last year, the district rushed to strip the project of its name and racial identity. By February, the U.S. Department of Education had opened a formal investigation. Now, instead of a center for Black student achievement, the public gets a vague “FACE” landing page with no mission, no curriculum, no programming, and no operating budget. Bond measures are not blank checks. Oregon bond law doesn’t allow districts to take money approved for one project and quietly spend it on another. If PPS believes it can’t legally deliver the CBSE it promised voters, it should say so—and ask voters before repurposing the funds. The Bond Accountability Committee should insist the bond funds be used on the CBSE or go back to voters for permission to repurpose the funds. Click HERE for John Charles’ Testimony to the BAC. Click HERE for the 730-word extended commentary.

    **ASE.Web.Podcasts.Duration.Minute.two**
مشاهدة الكل (٣١٥)

٤٫٦
من ٥
‫٩ من التقييمات‬

حول

Sit back and listen to Cascade Policy Institute explain the latest research on Oregon's important issues. Cascade advances public policy ideas that foster individual liberty, personal responsibility, and market-based economic opportunity. Visit us at www.cascadepolicy.org

المعلومات

  • صناع العمل
    Cascade Policy Institute
  • سنوات النشاط
    ٢٠٢٠ - ٢٠٢٦
  • الحلقات
    ٣١٥
  • التقييم
    ملائم
  • حقوق النشر
    © 212649
  • موقع البرنامج على الويب
    Cascade CounterPoint

قد يعجبك أيضًا