首頁
新發現
熱門排行榜
搜尋
Max's reading list
Max Lu
0.0(0則評分)
教育
ongoing reading list
最新單集
追蹤
集數
3月8日
Case Selection Logic in Qualitative Field Research
Mario Luis Small's "Case Selection in Field Research" examines the challenges faced by qualitative researchers, particularly ethnographers studying urban poverty, immigration, and social inequality, in a research landscape dominated by quantitative methodologies. The article critiques the common practice of imitating quantitative methods to enhance the generalizability of case studies, arguing that such attempts often superficially adopt the language without the underlying logic. Small employs Richard Feynman's concept of "cargo cult science" to illustrate this ineffectual imitation. Instead of striving for statistical representativeness in small-n studies, the author advocates for alternative approaches grounded in case study logic and logical inference, such as extending the extended case method and sequential interviewing. Ultimately, the article calls for a clearer understanding of the distinct epistemological contributions of qualitative research and the development of methods suited to generating logically sound hypotheses and identifying ontological realities. keepSave to notecopy_alldocsAdd noteaudio_magic_eraserAudio OverviewschoolBriefing doc
18 分鐘
3月8日
Grounded Theory Analysis of Special Education Decision Making
This article details a three-year ethnographic study employing grounded theory to investigate the overrepresentation of minority students in special education. The authors address methodological considerations in qualitative research and present a visual model illustrating their analytic process. Their research in an urban school district explored the decision-making processes contributing to this disproportionality. The findings suggest that a complex interplay of factors, including assumptions about families, perceived student deficits, administrative policies, and external pressures, contribute to the issue. The authors argue for the value of qualitative methods in understanding such intricate social phenomena, emphasizing that no single factor adequately explains overrepresentation. They also reflect on the challenges and limitations of applying grounded theory in educational research, advocating for methodological transparency and dialogue. keepSave to notecopy_alldocsAdd noteaudio_magic_eraserAudio OverviewschoolBriefing doc
18 分鐘
3月3日
The Formation of Community-Engaged Scholars: A Collaborative Approach to Doctoral Training in Education Research
Warren, M. R., Park, S. O., & Tieken, M. C. (2016). The Formation of Community-Engaged Scholars: A Collaborative Approach to Doctoral Training in Education Research. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.233 This paper examines the development of community-engaged scholars (CES) in doctoral programs, focusing on collaborative education research. It highlights the importance of fostering learning communities and creating opportunities for students to share stories and build relationships. The article investigates the skills, dispositions, and commitments that characterize community-engaged scholarship through a self-study of a research project at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. It examines the processes through which doctoral students acquire necessary skills and how they can contribute to ongoing practices of CES. The research emphasizes the importance of addressing power dynamics and promoting equity in community partnerships to create a more collaborative and sustainable approach to scholarship. Ultimately, it argues for a new generation of education researchers committed to working with communities and transforming schools. keepSave to notecopy_alldocsAdd noteaudio_magic_eraserAudio OverviewschoolBriefing doc
16 分鐘
3月3日
Relational ethnography. Theory and Society
Desmond, M. (2014). Relational ethnography. Theory and Society, 43(5), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9232-5 Matthew Desmond's "Relational Ethnography" argues for a shift in ethnographic research from studying bounded groups and places to examining relationships and processes. The author posits that traditional approaches often reinforce static and isolated views of social reality. Desmond advocates for "relational ethnography," focusing on fields, boundaries, processes, and cultural conflicts rather than fixed entities. He suggests that by prioritizing connections and interactions, researchers can generate richer explanations of social phenomena. The article outlines three distinct approaches for carrying out relational ethnography and also acknowledges the challenges and tradeoffs inherent in this methodology, including gaining entrée, achieving depth, identifying boundaries, writing relationally, and ensuring generalizability. Desmond calls for a more collaborative approach to ethnography, with researchers building upon each other's work to analyze sprawling networks of relations. He concludes that a relational perspective can help ethnographers develop arguments that better reflect the complex, interconnected nature of the social world. keepSave to notecopy_alldocsAdd noteaudio_magic_eraserAudio OverviewschoolBriefing doc
15 分鐘
3月3日
Intro- Qualitative Literacy: A Guide to Evaluating Ethnographic and Interview Research
This text explores the ongoing debate surrounding the evaluation of qualitative research in the social sciences. It highlights a historical divide between qualitative and quantitative researchers, noting a shift towards greater acceptance and influence of qualitative work. Despite this progress, disagreements persist regarding the criteria for assessing the quality and scientific validity of qualitative studies. The text discusses past attempts to establish unified standards, such as those by King, Keohane, and Verba, and the National Science Foundation, while still pointing out that those efforts have been met with controversy. It emphasizes the unique challenges in evaluating qualitative data due to the researcher's direct involvement in data production. The text proposes a focus on the execution of data collection, particularly in in-depth interviews and participant observation, suggesting "exposure" as a precondition, with cognitive empathy, heterogeneity, palpability, follow-up, and self-awareness as indicators of quality. keepSave to notecopy_alldocsAdd noteaudio_magic_eraserAudio OverviewschoolBriefing doc
15 分鐘
2月23日
Portraiture as Pedagogy: Learning Research through Context and Methodology
The International Journal of Education & the Arts article "Portraiture as Pedagogy" explores the use of portraiture as a qualitative research methodology, particularly within the context of arts education. The authors, a research team of graduate students and a faculty member, share their experiences using portraiture in an urban arts high school project. They emphasize the pedagogical benefits of this approach, highlighting how it allows researchers to negotiate boundaries, build relationships, and confront issues of representation through firsthand experience. The article presents individual "studies" that illustrate methodological challenges encountered during the research process, such as building trust, addressing race, and navigating researcher positionality. The authors argue that portraiture's strength lies in its capacity to generate new questions and promote reflexivity, rather than providing definitive answers. keepSave to notecopy_alldocsAdd noteaudio_magic_eraserAudio OverviewschoolBriefing doc
12 分鐘
2月23日
Qualitative Research: Understanding Cognitive Empathy in Ethnography
This guide underscores the importance of cognitive empathy in qualitative research, distinguishing it from sympathy. It emphasizes that a researcher's ability to understand the perceptions, meanings, and motivations of those studied from their own perspectives is crucial. The document uses examples of interview and observational data to illustrate how researchers can effectively demonstrate cognitive empathy in their work, focusing on techniques like asking clarifying questions and providing detailed descriptions. It argues that conveying this understanding in research reports requires ample space to showcase evidence of probing and careful observation. The guide offers examples, such as Watkins-Hayes's study on women living with HIV and Deener's work on ethnic conflict, to illustrate how strong qualitative research can reflect a high level of cognitive empathy, enabling readers to understand participants as the participants understand themselves. keepSave to notecopy_alldocsAdd noteaudio_magic_eraserAudio OverviewschoolBriefing doc
23 分鐘
2月23日
IRT Models: Comparison of 1, 2, and 3 Parameter Models
This module provides an overview of Item Response Theory (IRT) models, specifically comparing the 1-, 2-, and 3-parameter logistic models. It details the mathematical formulas for each model and illustrates the impact of varying item parameters like difficulty, discrimination, and the pseudo-guessing parameter. A key focus is on how these parameters influence item characteristic curves and how they relate to examinee ability. Furthermore, the text addresses parameter estimation procedures using programs like LOGIST and BILOG and discusses methods for evaluating how well these models fit observed data. The module also acknowledges the assumptions underlying IRT models, such as unidimensionality, and provides annotated references for further study. Finally, teaching aids designed to complement this module, including data sets and parameter values, are available from the NCME. keepSave to notecopy_alldocsAdd noteaudio_magic_eraserAudio OverviewschoolBriefing doc
13 分鐘
顯示全部 (30)
簡介
ongoing reading list
資訊
創作者
Max Lu
活躍年代
2025年
集數
30
年齡分級
兒少適宜
版權
© Max Lu
節目網站
Max's reading list
若要收聽兒少不宜的單集,請登入帳號。
登入
隨時掌握此節目最新消息
登入或註冊後,即可追蹤節目、儲存單集和掌握最新資訊。
登入
選取國家或地區
非洲、中東和印度
顯示全部
Algeria
Angola
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Benin
Botswana
Brunei Darussalam
Burkina Faso
Cameroun
Cape Verde
Chad
Côte d’Ivoire
Congo, The Democratic Republic Of The
Egypt
Eswatini
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Guinea-Bissau
India
Iraq
Israel
Jordan
Kenya
Kuwait
Lebanon
Liberia
Libya
Madagascar
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Morocco
Mozambique
Namibia
Niger (English)
Nigeria
Oman
Qatar
Congo, Republic of
Rwanda
São Tomé and Príncipe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
South Africa
Sri Lanka
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic Of
Tunisia
Turkmenistan
United Arab Emirates
Uganda
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe
亞太地區
顯示全部
Afghanistan
Australia
Bhutan
Cambodia
中国大陆
Fiji
香港
Indonesia (English)
日本
Kazakhstan
대한민국
Kyrgyzstan
Lao People's Democratic Republic
澳門
Malaysia (English)
Maldives
Micronesia, Federated States of
Mongolia
Myanmar
Nauru
Nepal
New Zealand
Pakistan
Palau
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Singapore
Solomon Islands
台灣
Thailand
Tonga
Turkmenistan
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vietnam
歐洲
顯示全部
Albania
Armenia
Österreich
Belarus
Belgium
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czechia
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France (Français)
Georgia
Deutschland
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italia
Kosovo
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg (English)
Malta
Moldova, Republic Of
Montenegro
Nederland
North Macedonia
Norway
Poland
Portugal (Português)
Romania
Россия
Serbia
Slovakia
Slovenia
España
Sverige
Schweiz
Türkiye (English)
Ukraine
United Kingdom
拉丁美洲與加勒比海地區
顯示全部
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina (Español)
Bahamas
Barbados
Belize
Bermuda
Bolivia (Español)
Brasil
Virgin Islands, British
Cayman Islands
Chile (Español)
Colombia (Español)
Costa Rica (Español)
Dominica
República Dominicana
Ecuador (Español)
El Salvador (Español)
Grenada
Guatemala (Español)
Guyana
Honduras (Español)
Jamaica
México
Montserrat
Nicaragua (Español)
Panamá
Paraguay (Español)
Perú
St. Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
St. Vincent and The Grenadines
Suriname
Trinidad and Tobago
Turks and Caicos
Uruguay (English)
Venezuela (Español)
美國與加拿大
顯示全部
Canada (English)
Canada (Français)
United States
Estados Unidos (Español México)
الولايات المتحدة
США
美国 (简体中文)
États-Unis (Français France)
미국
Estados Unidos (Português Brasil)
Hoa Kỳ
美國 (繁體中文台灣)