🎉 Christ in Private Practice has reached 100 episodes! For this milestone conversation, Camille McDaniel, LPC is joined by returning guests Diana S. Rice, LMHC, CIMHP, QS and Melissa Gendreau, LMHC for an honest roundtable about a question Christian mental health professionals increasingly face: How do we thoughtfully evaluate treatment modalities through a biblical worldview without allowing fear, assumptions, or disagreement to polarize us from one another? Before asking whether a modality is compatible with our faith, this conversation challenges clinicians to examine what webring to the evaluation, including our clinical training, church traditions, personal experiences, wounds, values, assumptions, and blind spots. Ultimately, this episode isn't about telling Christian clinicians which modalities they should or shouldn't use. It's about learning to ask better questions. How did I reach this conclusion?What assumptions am I bringing with me?Have I actually studied the modality?Is this conviction, unfamiliarity, fear, personal history or something else?Have I sought Scripture in context, accurate information, prayer, professional wisdom, and wise counsel? As Diana reminds us in the conversation, we need to “ask better questions and pause” as we seek to understand why we believe what we believe. That kind of reflection can strengthen not only our clinical decision-making, but also how we serve our clients and relate to one another as professionals and believers. 🎙️ Welcome to Episode 100 of Christ in Private Practice. Thank you for listening, learning, questioning, and growing with us through these first 100 conversations. Here’s to the next chapter. CONNECT WITH CHRIST IN PRIVATE PRACTICE Visit: camillemcdaniel.com or christinprivatepractice.com Subscribe to Christ in Private Practice for conversations about ethical faith integration, clinical practice, and professional development for Christian mental health professionals. JOIN THE CONVERSATION What helps you determine whether your concern about a treatment modality reflects informed clinical and spiritual discernment or simply discomfort with something unfamiliar? Share your thoughts in the comments.