Civics In A Year

The Center for American Civics
  • 4.0 (3)
  • COURSES

What do you really know about American government, the Constitution, and your rights as a citizen? Civics in a Year is a fast-paced podcast series that delivers essential civic knowledge in just 10 minutes per episode. Over the course of a year, we’ll explore 250 key questions—from the founding documents and branches of government to civil liberties, elections, and public participation. Rooted in the Civic Literacy Curriculum from the Center for American Civics at Arizona State University, this series is a collaborative project supported by the School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership. Each episode is designed to spark curiosity, strengthen constitutional understanding, and encourage active citizenship. Whether you're a student, educator, or lifelong learner, Civics in a Year will guide you through the building blocks of American democracy—one question at a time.

  1. 22H AGO

    Who Becomes President? Succession, the Vice Presidency, and Executive Power

    The most fragile part of the presidency isn’t the election. It’s the moment something goes wrong and the country still needs a commander in chief, a working cabinet, and a government that doesn’t freeze. That’s why we brought on Jordan Cash, assistant professor of political theory and constitutional democracy at Michigan State University, to walk us through presidential succession, the vice presidency, and what these rules say about executive power. We start with a simple but underrated idea: the executive branch has to run all the time. Congress can recess and the courts can wait for cases, but enforcement, diplomacy, and crisis response don’t stop. From there, we dig into why the framers invented the vice presidency so late in the Constitutional Convention, why it originally helped the Electoral College function, and how it solved a very practical Senate problem with tie breaking without giving any state extra votes. Then the history gets real. We unpack John Tyler’s 1841 showdown over whether a vice president becomes president or merely serves as acting president, and how the Tyler precedent shaped every transition after it. We also trace how Congress keeps reworking the presidential line of succession, and why debates over cabinet officials versus congressional leaders always come back to legitimacy and separation of powers. Finally, we break down the 25th Amendment’s rules for vacancies and presidential incapacity and why Watergate made those safeguards feel “just in time,” including Gerald Ford’s unique path to the Oval Office. If you like constitutional history, the 25th Amendment, the Electoral College, and the real mechanics of executive power, this one will give you a clean map plus a few great rabbit holes. Subscribe, share this with a civics nerd, and leave us a review with your take: who should be next in the line of succession after the vice president? The Isolated Presidency Adding the Lone Star: John Tyler, Sam Houston, and the Annexation of Texas Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership Center for American Civics

    42 min

  2. 22H AGO

    Susan B. Anthony and a Constitutional Challenge

    Susan B. Anthony’s most radical move was not that she voted, it was why she believed she had every right to. After she walked into a Rochester polling place in 1872 and cast a ballot, the state treated her like a criminal. Anthony treated the Constitution like evidence. Her speech, “Is it a Crime for a U.S. Citizen to Vote?”, becomes a blueprint for how Americans challenge power when the law says one thing and the nation’s ideals say another. We step into the Reconstruction era, when the 14th Amendment redefines U.S. citizenship and the 15th Amendment tries to protect voting rights while leaving women out entirely. Anthony seizes that omission and makes a precise constitutional argument: if women are persons, and persons born in the United States are citizens, then women are citizens. And if citizenship means anything, she argues, it must include political rights. Along the way we unpack popular sovereignty, the meaning of “we the people,” and why she connects women’s disenfranchisement to taxation without representation and the consent of the governed. Then the hard part: the courts disagree. Minor v. Happersett draws a line between citizenship and suffrage, revealing a gap between constitutional ideals and constitutional law. We close by following Anthony’s influence into the women’s suffrage movement, the 19th Amendment, and the reminder that equal voting rights still required the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and sustained enforcement. If the Constitution speaks for the people, who gets counted, and who has to fight to be heard? Subscribe for more stories at the crossroads of history and constitutional law, share this with a friend who loves civic debates, and leave a review if it helped you see voting rights differently. What do you think should come automatically with citizenship? Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership Center for American Civics

    10 min

  3. APR 2

    Plessy Vs. Ferguson

    We walk through Plessy v. Ferguson and how a planned railcar protest helps the Supreme Court legitimize Jim Crow through the “separate but equal” doctrine. We also dig into Justice John Marshall Harlan’s dissent and why his warning about caste and constitutional duty keeps showing up in modern legal fights.  • rise of Jim Crow segregation in the 1880s and 1890s and why transportation becomes a focal point  • why public accommodations matter in constitutional law and equal access  • Homer Plessy’s test case and what “passing” reveals about racial classification  • the unusual coalition of civil rights activists and railroad operators opposing segregation mandates  • the Court’s reliance on “reasonableness” and its attempt to recast civil rights as social policy  • Harlan’s separation of powers critique and his colorblind Constitution argument  • how Plessy becomes a green light for broader segregation across schools and daily life  • how dissents shape legal strategy and help pave the way to Brown v. Board of Education  Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership Center for American Civics

    18 min

  4. APR 1

    The Lodge Bill of 1890 and the Rise of Jim Crow

    The Lodge Bill of 1890 should be as famous as the Compromise of 1877, yet most of us have never heard of it. We sit down with Dr. Sean Beienberg to unpack how a federal election oversight plan, built around Article I, Section 4, tried to protect free and honest ballots in the South and why its failure helped clear a path toward Jim Crow. If you care about voting rights, election integrity, and the limits of federal power, this story hits hard because it shows how quickly democracy can narrow when enforcement disappears.  We start with the surprising reality that Black voting in the post-Reconstruction South stayed closer to white voting rates into the mid-1880s, then began to drop as intimidation, ballot fraud, and machine politics gained ground. From there we follow the Republican push to enforce the 15th Amendment, the party’s 1888 platform language, and Henry Cabot Lodge’s careful attempt to balance federalism with meaningful protection through federal supervisors and observers. We also explore why Southern Democrats and even political power centers like New York City framed the proposal as a dangerous “Force Bill,” turning oversight into a flashpoint over state sovereignty.  Then the Senate fight turns into a lesson in how power actually moves: a filibuster to buy time, a strategic effort to peel off votes, and a deal tied to silver that flips key senators from Nevada and Colorado. We connect the Lodge Bill’s collapse to the 1892 campaign, the 1894 rollback of federal enforcement, and the rapid wave of mass disfranchisement that followed. We close by defining Jim Crow as government-backed legal racial inequality and setting up our next conversation on Plessy v. Ferguson. If this episode changed how you see U.S. democracy, subscribe, share it with a friend, and leave us a review. Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership Center for American Civics

    14 min

  5. MAR 31

    What the Black Man Wants by Frederick Douglass

    Freedom is easy to celebrate in slogans and hard to define when the laws get written. Today we sit with Frederick Douglass at the end of the Civil War as he delivers one of the most direct speeches of the Reconstruction era: “What the Black Man Wants.” The country has ended slavery in practice and is debating the 13th Amendment, but Douglass pushes the real issue to the front: what does freedom actually mean if millions of formerly enslaved people still lack political power? We walk through Douglass’s core arguments in plain terms: he asks for “simply justice,” not pity, and he insists that slavery isn’t truly abolished without the ballot. We connect his logic to the Constitution’s system of representation, the idea of consent of the governed, and the basic problem of rights that exist only on paper. We also unpack his sharp response to claims that Black Americans were “unprepared” for citizenship, including his challenge that anyone expected to pay taxes is also fit to vote. Douglass grounds everything in founding ideals, not new ones. His natural rights claim echoes the Declaration of Independence and points straight at the contradiction between American liberty and American exclusion. He also warns against gradualism, arguing that delayed justice is denied justice, and he frames voting rights and equal protection under law as essential tools of self-protection in a violent and uncertain era. If you care about Reconstruction history, Frederick Douglass, voting rights, or what citizenship should mean in a democracy, this conversation will sharpen your view. Subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review, then tell us: who is still fighting to be fully included today? Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership Center for American Civics

    8 min

  6. MAR 30

    How The 14th Amendment Applies The Bill Of Rights To States

    The Fourteenth Amendment promises a baseline of freedom, but the Supreme Court built that promise through a long series of workarounds. We start with incorporation: how protections in the first eight amendments of the Bill of Rights come to bind state governments, not just the federal government. Along the way, we revisit what Reconstruction lawmakers were trying to fix, why a national “floor of rights” mattered, and how early decisions like United States v. Cruikshank helped stall incorporation for decades. From there, we get into the part that makes lawyers argue and students groan: selective incorporation and substantive due process. We explain how the Court first used the Due Process Clause to protect “liberty of contract” during the Lochner era, then later pivoted to using the same clause to selectively apply speech, criminal procedure, and other civil liberties against the states. We also talk about Justice Hugo Black’s blunt critique and why the Court still resists the cleaner logic of total incorporation, even when modern cases like McDonald and Timbs keep pushing the doctrine in that direction. We close by connecting incorporation to two bigger battlegrounds: unenumerated rights and equal protection. We unpack how privacy arguments show up in Griswold and Roe, what Dobbs changes, and why federalism questions can get tangled with individual rights claims. Then we shift to the Equal Protection Clause, where “all laws classify” forces courts to draw lines between reasonable policy and arbitrary discrimination, through cases like Plessy, Brown, Korematsu, and Loving. If you care about civil rights, civil liberties, and how the Constitution applies in real life, subscribe, share this with a friend, and leave a review so more listeners can find the series. Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership Center for American Civics

    30 min

  7. MAR 27

    How Reconstruction Built Birthright Citizenship And Equal Protection

    The Fourteenth Amendment is often treated like a simple shortcut for “civil rights,” but its real story is messier, more political, and far more useful for understanding today’s constitutional fights. We pick up in Reconstruction, right after slavery ends on paper, when Southern states rush to impose Black Codes that restrict contracts, court access, and basic freedom of movement. That backlash pushes Congress toward the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and then straight into the hard question: what gives Congress the constitutional authority to do any of this? From there, we walk clause by clause through what the Fourteenth Amendment is trying to lock in. We explain how the Citizenship Clause is built to overturn Dred Scott and why its spare wording fuels modern disputes over birthright citizenship and the meaning of “subject to the jurisdiction.” We also connect the big three protections in Section One privileges or immunities, due process, and equal protection to the practical problem they’re trying to solve: stopping states from creating one set of rights on paper and another in real life. We also spend time on the sections people forget. Section Two’s representation penalty reveals how lawmakers tried (and failed) to deter disenfranchisement. Section Three’s ban on officeholding for former Confederates shows how Reconstruction uses constitutional design to shape political power. Finally, we trace how “no state shall” complicates federal civil rights law, from the Civil Rights Act of 1875 and the meaning of “public accommodations” to the Supreme Court’s 1883 decision and the long road to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. If you want a clearer handle on Reconstruction Amendments, constitutional law, equal protection, due process, and the roots of modern civil rights debates, hit subscribe, share the episode with a friend, and leave us a review. What part of the Fourteenth Amendment do you most want us to unpack in part two? Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership Center for American Civics

    17 min

  8. MAR 26

    How The 13th And 15th Amendments End Slavery And Redefine Voting

    The Constitution can promise freedom and still fail to deliver it. We dig into the 13th and 15th Amendments and ask what they were really designed to fix after the Civil War and why their impact has swung so wildly across American history.  We start with the 13th Amendment and why it matters beyond the Emancipation Proclamation. Emancipation is a wartime measure and geographically limited, so we explain how the 13th Amendment removes those constraints and makes abolition a permanent federal policy. We also talk about the deeper question Reconstruction immediately triggers: once slavery is banned, what counts as slavery in practice, and what “badges and incidents” can survive through law, violence, and coercion?  From there we move to the 15th Amendment and the fight over voting rights. Its wording is famous, but its structure is easy to miss: it’s framed as a ban on race-based denial rather than an affirmative right to vote. We unpack why that matters for federal enforcement, highlight Frederick Douglass’s argument that racially neutral suffrage lets Black citizens defend their civil liberties at the ballot box, and look at how the Enforcement Acts and the Grant administration take direct aim at Klan intimidation. Then we track the hard turn: not just court battles, but Congress pulling back, allowing literacy tests and grandfather clauses to gut the promise of Reconstruction until key moments like Guinn v. United States and, most importantly, the Voting Rights Act of 1965.  We close with a question that still lands today: what do we do with the 13th Amendment’s “except as punishment for a crime” clause, and how has that language been used over time? If you care about Reconstruction history, voting rights, federalism, and civil rights enforcement, subscribe, share this episode, and leave a review so more listeners can find the series. Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum! School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership Center for American Civics

    19 min
See All (192)

Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

4
out of 5
3 Ratings

About

What do you really know about American government, the Constitution, and your rights as a citizen? Civics in a Year is a fast-paced podcast series that delivers essential civic knowledge in just 10 minutes per episode. Over the course of a year, we’ll explore 250 key questions—from the founding documents and branches of government to civil liberties, elections, and public participation. Rooted in the Civic Literacy Curriculum from the Center for American Civics at Arizona State University, this series is a collaborative project supported by the School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership. Each episode is designed to spark curiosity, strengthen constitutional understanding, and encourage active citizenship. Whether you're a student, educator, or lifelong learner, Civics in a Year will guide you through the building blocks of American democracy—one question at a time.

Information

  • Creator
    The Center for American Civics
  • Years Active
    2025 - 2026
  • Episodes
    192
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2026 Civics In A Year
  • Show Website
    Civics In A Year

You Might Also Like