Confluence Formation

Aram Mitchell

Principles, practices, and prayers for living life to the full. arammitchell.substack.com

  1. 1h ago

    The Relatable Rascal and His Sweet Surrender

    There’s a bible verse, in the book of Psalms, chapter 46 verse 10, where the poet imagines God speaking to those who God loves. In the bible that you might find in the top drawer of a hotel room somewhere in rural America, it reads: “Be still and know that I am God.” That admonition—”be still”—is translated from the Hebrew raphah, and means to let go, relax, release control, or (my favorite) cease striving. Psalm 46:10 is the sort of bible verse that gets embroidered into sentimental couch cushions and sold on Etsy, because: Who among us isn’t worn out and weary? We’re so stressed, high-strung, and bent out of shape—it takes the veritable voice of God to get through to us such that we actually give ourselves permission to lay our head on a pillow and take a nap. I am all for simple, radical acts of self care, especially for the worn out and overworked. That said, I think the deeper sentiment of Psalm 46:10 is this: Intimate encounter with the divine is always preceded by some kind of surrender. Have you ever found yourself working so hard to improve your life, to make yourself better, to heal a broken relationship, to heal a broken heart—and no matter how much effort you apply, no matter how much you struggle and strive, you just can’t make your way forward? Of course you have. You’re human. And struggling and striving is part of the human experience. Here’s the thing though: It need not be the aim, the end goal, or the final word of the human experience. You’ve likely been there before: Effort effort effort. Struggle struggle struggle. Strive strive strive. Until something shifts… But I’m getting ahead of myself. There’s a story in the bible about a man who learned the lesson of sweet surrender one night on the bank of a river, at the brink of a breakdown. To understand that story, it’s important to know where this man came from. His name was Jacob—though, as we’ll soon see, that will change before the sun rises. Last week I wrote about Rebekah’s life, and her experience of being pregnant with twins that clashed within her. One of those twins was Jacob. He was Rebekah’s favorite son, and he was born hot on the heels of his just-barely-older twin brother, Esau. As the older of the two brothers, Esau had the privilege of possessing the promise of inheritance of the family’s wealth and legacy—this was Esau’s birthright. When they’d grown up a bit from boyhood, Jacob managed to scheme Esau out of his birthright. Jacob did this with a pot of stew. It must have been some pretty good stew. Though, when you read that part of the story, you get the impression that Esau wasn’t too worried about needing all that family inheritance anyways. Esau was more comfortable in wild places, hunting his own supper, than he was in the kitchen cooking up schemes or in the Board room securing legal deals. Jacob, however, was at home among human dwellings and among their dealings and deceptions. Later, with their mother’s support, Jacob scams Esau again, but this time in a way that Esau cares a lot about. Jacob tricks their dad, Isaac, into giving him the fatherly blessing that was intended for Esau. This one was more of a spiritual inheritance. Not the material trappings of wealth that Esau couldn’t care less about, but the magical paternal prayer that ordained the future and secured the power of those who were on the receiving end of this prayer. Isaac was blind in his old age. And Jacob was thirsty for more assurance, for more security, for more promises that his future would pan out, so he takes advantage of the situation by impersonating Esau, and conning Isaac into saying the magical prayer of blessing over him. Over Jacob. Not Esau. And there are no take backs on things like this. So when Esau finds out about the con he sees red. You can hear him raging: “It’s one thing to essentially outwit me from my inheritance—that’s just stuff—but it’s something else entirely to make a fool of our father and steal my spiritual power in the process.” Esau resolves to kill Jacob. Their mom finds out, tells Jacob to get out of dodge, and he does. Jacob bolts, and doesn’t come back. Not until we meet him in the story found in Genesis chapter 32, where he’s standing on the bank of the river, looking back at his life so far, and finally confronting the unavoidable uncertainty of his future. Throughout all the stories leading up to the moment on the river bank Jacob reads more like a trickster than a patriarch. He is an unholy rascal. After running away from home Jacob spends decades on a whole series of other cons where he bests his uncle, Laban, and gets wealthy at Laban’s expense. Jacob fathers children with four women, two of whom are his cousins, the other two are his slaves. He is not a particularly honorable man. If you read his stories you’ll notice, Jacob never stops calculating, playing the angle for the greatest personal profit or—when profit is not available—for the best odds at saving his own skin, whatever the cost. And when it comes to faith—although God tends to turn up in his dreams with big promises—Jacob’s theology is more transactional—about cashing in on those promises—than it is relational or contemplative or devotional, like the fatih of his father and his grandfather. Jacob moves through the world true to the name his mother gave him: He is grasper, striver, disrupter, willing to deceive and displace anyone who gets in the way of what he wants. He’s a rascal. But he’s relatable. Because what he seems to want is about the same as what most of us want: He wants to know that everything is going to be alright. That he’ll make it through. That he’ll have enough. Jacob has always been a worrier. Always been striving for more blessing, more security, more assurance about the future. Up until now Jacob is the man who struggles. He struggles with his brother. He struggles against himself. He grasps at the future with desperation in his clenched fists. Jacob is you and me any time our worry about the future supplants our presence in the moment. When we find him on the river bank he’s on his way back home. Back to the site of his first big con. Back to Esau’s turf. And Jacob is understandably worried. He has no idea how this return home is going to go down, but he’s maxed out his luck and skill as a conman, and he’s assessed his options, and sees that his best move to secure the future is for him to confront his past. Genesis 32 (the end) So Jacob was left alone, and a man wrestled with him till daybreak. When the man saw that he could not overpower him, he touched the socket of Jacob’s hip so that his hip was wrenched as he wrestled with the man. Then the man said, “Let me go, for it is daybreak.” But Jacob replied, “I will not let you go unless you bless me.” The man asked him, “What is your name?” “Jacob,” he answered. Then the man said, “Your name will no longer be Jacob, but Israel, because you have struggled with God and with men and have overcome.” Jacob said, “Please tell me your name.” But he replied, “Why do you ask my name?” Then he blessed him there. So Jacob called the place Peniel, saying, “It is because I saw God face to face, and it saved my life.” The sun rose above him as he passed Peniel, and he was limping because of his hip. Maybe you’ve experienced this before: Effort effort effort. Struggle struggle struggle. Strive strive strive. You’re at war with your thoughts. At war with the world around you. You’re pummeling your own heart with judgement. You’re flooding life with worries about the future. Until something starts to shift… You pause in the middle of all your efforts. You don’t let go exactly, not fully, not yet. But you cease striving. You quiet the struggle enough to actually look at Who it is you have in a headlock. You quiet yourself enough to listen and hear some sort of a divine whisper: “Let go. Let go. A new morning is dawning.” But your struggle flairs up. You resist: “No! I will not let go! Not until I get all the assurance that I need!” Then more quiet. And you hear this question, not the assurance you were looking for exactly: “Who are you?” You say your name: I’m the one who worries. I’m the one who holds it together. I’m the one who figures it out. I’m the one who suffers. Then there’s silence. And a glimmer in the eye of the one who beholds you. You see them seeing you—seeing right through all your old names for yourself. With a smile, they ask: “I mean really, who are you?” That’s when the shift settles in. It’s usually—or, perhaps, always—an internal shift. You see how you are making it more complicated than it needs to be. You let go of the stories that you’ve been telling yourself about yourself. You loosen into the possibility that there is another way. You surrender. Now, listen close, because this part is very important: The quality of this particular form of surrender is not an I-give-up surrender. This is not resignation. It’s not, “I give up on myself.” Or, “I give up on my health.” Or, “I give up on this relationship.” Or, “I give up on the life I want to live.” The quality of this surrender is an I-need-help surrender. It is a sweet and empowering surrender. Do you see the difference? To struggle and strive is not the aim of the human experience. But neither is despair or cynical resignation—giving up when we face the inevitable challenges of uncertainty in this world. Isn’t it fascinating that Jacob never really gets an answer to his question? But with sweet surrender at the edge of all of his uncertainties he’s confident that it’s God who he has encountered. And isn’t it fascinating that it’s God who surrenders first in the story? I don’t know exactly what to do with that, other than to see the all-powerful showing us that the power to bless comes on

    15 min
  2. Jun 29

    Pregnant with the clash of twins

    “And the twins clashed together within her, and she said, ‘If this is to be, then why am I here?’ And she took her question straight to God.” –Genesis 25:22 Today I want to tell you about Rebekah. And I want to show you two things that Rebekah shows us. One thing comes from a careful study of the character of Rebekah: A profile of one woman who finds her ways of being powerful in a culture designed to disempower women. (Sound familiar?) My hope in looking at Rebekah in this way is that the women who are reading this might find themselves in good company, and see echoes of their own power in the story of Rebekah. The second thing that Rebekah shows us comes from a more universal, mythic look at who she is in the Genesis 25 reading above, where we learn that she becomes pregnant with the clash of twins. My hope here is that we can see in Rebekah what it is to be fully human in pursuit of the divine—experiencing inner conflict, even as we insist on being whole and complete. I’m eager to look at that mythic mirror for our inner lives, and to consider what we can glean about being fully human regardless of our gender or positionality. And we will look at that, in a little bit. But to do that, first, we have to look closer at the woman, Rebekah, in her full subjectivity and personhood. Because we live in a culture—one built on a continuous string of cultures—that suppresses the agency and personhood of women. One that minimizes the labor and livelihood of women. And all the more so for women of color—women with black and brown skin, especially in my western context. But across cultures in our world today, and throughout much of recorded history, it is the norm for men to dominate the women in their lives. Sometimes they do this directly—with actions and words that demean, ridicule, or belittle their wives and girlfriends and sisters and mothers. And it often shows up in seemingly small interactions. Last week, on the ferry ride home to Maine from a visit in Nova Scotia, as we were lining up to return to our vehicles, I overheard one man as he looked around confused, he said, “Well where’d she go? I lost my wife.” Another man nearby called out, “If you’re lucky, you won’t find her.” And they both had a chuckle. And I know that that second guy was trying to be funny, because I too have been in situations where I’ve resorted to lazy humor out of an effort to be clever. But cleverness is always hiding something. And those small barbs of attempted humor take a toll. And I was there carrying my daughter in my arms with my wife at my side—and I am an articulate and charismatic person—but I kept silent. I didn’t say anything to challenge that microaggression of misogyny. Sometimes we do it directly. But sometimes we do it indirectly. Like I did. Not with actions and words, but with silence. Or by privileging the work and voices of men, by centering men’s histories, by giving more benefit of the doubt to sons than we do to daughters. By using the ideas of women without acknowledging the source of those ideas. So this is a good place to acknowledge, here, that I couldn’t do the work I do in the world, let alone write this reflection, without the partnership of my wife, Emma. She and I talked about Rebekah being pregnant with the clash of twins for much of our drive home after that ferry ride, and she shared with me her experience as a woman, and as a mother, of feeling her personhood consistently subsumed into the roles she plays rather than the whole and complete person she is. And I know she’s not alone. Paying attention to her experience, and to my own mother’s, and my sister’s, and my nieces’, and more and more anticipating the culture that my daughter will continue to face in this world as she grows—I am indebted to the illumination inherent to the lived experiences of the powerful women in my life. A woman in her power is a powerful thing indeed. And perhaps just as powerful in its correlation is a community that sees and calls forth the strength, creativity, beauty and full personhood of women. This doesn’t mean that every woman is a paragon of perfect love and power well-used. But it does say something about how important it is in a culture that selectively uses and oppresses women—to counter that culture by heeding the experiences of women as a deep source of wisdom that points us all closer to what it means to be fully human. That’s wisdom that is worth heeding—and a practice worth practicing—regardless of your gender. So we turn to the story of Rebekah with our eyes open to who she is—not just reduced to whose mother or wife she becomes, but who she is in her individuality, as a divine subject. We first encounter Rebekah on her own, at a well, collecting water for her household. The bible tells us that she is beautiful. And shows us in the storytelling action that she is powerful, spirited, and energetic. We meet her because Abraham has sent the chief steward of his household—a man named Eliezer—on a journey to Abraham’s homeland to find a wife for his son Isaac. Eliezer gathers supplies and companions for the journey, including a bunch of camels, to help them cross a long stretch of desert. So they all land in Rebekah’s backyard thirsty. Eliezer asks God to show him who he should pursue to complete his mission of finding a bride for Isaac. He makes a plan: “O Lord, God of my master Abraham, if you are going to grant success to the journey on which I come, here, I am poised by the spring of water, and let it be that the young woman who comes out to draw water to whom I say, ‘Let me drink a bit of water from your jug,’ and she says to me, ‘Drink, and for your camels, too, I shall draw water,’ she is the wife that the Lord has marked for my master’s son.’” And that’s what happens when Rebekah arrives on the scene. She makes that offer to Eliezer. And the story kind of glosses over this part if you read it in Genesis 24, but with one jug she fills a trough for ten thirsty camels. One thirsty camel can drink 30-50 gallons of water. If you do the math, even conservatively, Rebekah is hauling over a ton of water from that spring one jugful at a time. Like, over an actual ton. Hercules, move over. We are meant to walk away from this encounter with our jaws dropped open, noting the incredible energy, strength, power, and perseverance of this young woman. Eliezer notices, and gives Rebekah gifts, and tells her why he’s here. And he asks her who her father is, and when she responds she tells him who her grandmother is. And then she runs to her mother’s household to tell her family about Eliezer’s proposal. Rebekah tracks her lineage and makes her home according to the women who precede here, which is a contrast to the ways of Abraham’s household, though this matrilineal tracking by Rebekah plants a seed of precedent that carries through in key moments in the bible, where the power and ingenuity of women will break through the dull throb of patriarchy that dominates so much of the biblical narrative. When they hear about Eliezer’s proposal, Rebekah’s brother and mother agree that it’s a great match, but before sending her away to become a wife and a mother, they ask Rebekah if she wants to go. Which is not insignificant. She says yes, she is willing. And her mother’s household blesses her directly: “Our sister, become hence myriads teeming…” And so blessed, she heads out. As she nears the land of her betrothed she sees a man in the distance sauntering in a field and asks Eliezer: “Who is that man?” The cinematography of this scene comes right out of a dramatic romance. Isaac sees her in the distance too, and they meet in the field, and something seems to spark between them. The bible tells us that Isaac loved Rebekah, and the word used here for love—ahev—this is the first time that this word for love is used between a husband and his wife in the bible. It is not a word for the duties of marriage, but a term of endearment and affection. Rebekah is beautiful, powerful, willful, and beloved. She’s also wily. Later in the story, after the birth of her twins, driven by what-exactly-we-do-not-know—fear or bitterness, her own or the storyteller’s prejudice—she ostracizes one of her sons and privileges another, training him to employ his heel-grabbing cleverness for personal gain. At the end of all the tellings—and there are plenty more—Rebekah is one of the most active women in the bible. A woman who even in the predominately patriarchal context of the bible, consistently uses her voice and her will to claim her own agency and vision. She is not alone. She is among women who break through against the odds to show themselves not as objects to be used but as whole and complete subjects who curate the divine within, choosing to then offer what is within them as a gift to the world. She is not alone. Rebekah brings to mind another woman who is often seen as a mere vessel for God, but whose agency was a vital part of her power as the mother of the Christian messiah. Mary, the mother of Jesus, is traditionally called theotokos, or God-bearer. Before Jesus was born, Mary said yes to growing God in her own being. Jesus’ subjectivity was ultimately dependent on Mary’s. She was a woman, like Rebekah, who contained God in herself. The way I see it, we are all called to be God-bearers, to bring forth the divine in our labors of love. But before doing that we have to learn what it is to grow God in ourselves. Which brings us to the mythic question: “And the twins clashed together within her, and she said, ‘If this is to be, then why am I here?’ And she took her question straight to God.” –Genesis 25:22 Here we step away from the particularities of the legend of Rebekah the matriarch, and we cross into the realm of myth. With mythic consciousness we can see Rebekah’s experience as a mirror

    16 min
  3. Jun 16

    She Gave God a Name

    This reflection is from a sermon I preached at Edgecomb Community Church, based on the stories about Hagar in Genesis chapters 16 & 21. First of all, read A Litany for Survival, by Audre Lorde. Read it aloud. Go do that real slow, then come on back. Now, here are my thoughts… The world is not fair. We live in a world full of exploitation. And we have for a long time. Scan our history and you come up with plenty of heartbreaking examples: * Women, exploited by men who treat them like property. * Indigenous people, exploited by settlers who claimed their homelands and infected them with disease and with ideas of ownership. * Kidnapped Africans, exploited by landowning Europeans who stole their labor and used their bodies in whatever ways they chose, with impunity. * Poor and working class people, exploited by bosses and politicians who make sure their wages are just low enough to keep them on the edge of desperation and dependence. The world is not fair. Of course, there are powerful exceptions: * Men who value, cherish, and uplift women. * Settlers, and descendants of settlers, who strive to dismantle false ideas of ownership and to repair harms done. * White people who are doing the work of recognizing how racism continues to infect every level of our lives together, and helping to build actively anti-racist institutions. * Business owners and public figures who insist on living wages for working people, and who define those wages not based on mere subsistence but on creating opportunities to thrive. But my point remains: The world is not fair. And we are each affected by that in different ways. Some of us live up against the odds of the systems and circumstances that we’re born into. Some of us live boosted by the odds of the systems and circumstances that we’re born into. Whatever our situation, the world is not fair, and we get to help it shift, bending the world toward greater justice. For all of us—whatever our circumstances—the most effective way of changing the world is by shifting our focus from what we can’t control to what we can change. This is a spiritual practice of resilience that forms a pathway to faithful participation in the continuous work of creation. And that’s what I want to take a look at now. You’ve heard the Serenity Prayer, right? “God, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.” That’s a good prayer. There’s another prayer, a chunk of a poem by Adrienne Rich, with a similar sentiment: My heart is moved by all I cannot save:so much has been destroyed I have to cast my lot with thosewho age after age, perversely, with no extraordinary power,reconstitute the world. Whether the odds are stacked against you, or whether you were born with privilege that has benefited you in this life—where are you casting your lot? I’m casting lots on people like Hagar. I read this whole saga between Sarah, Abraham, and Hagar with Hagar as the hero. That is my cultivated bias. At bible study on Wednesday evenings at my church we’ve been practicing the art of acknowledging our own perspective and biases—and the ways that we bring our own lived experience into how we interpret sacred text. When we acknowledge our own perspective, we are then able to see how other people’s perspectives can help us glean more insight and wisdom from the bible than we ever would have been able to see on our own. And we have the chance then to take what we glean and put it to use making the world better for more people. That’s what we’re aiming to do when we open up stories like the one about Abraham and Sarah banishing Hagar and her child to the desert. That’s the story in Genesis chapter 21. At the end of that one, Hagar and Ishmael make their way to some kind of liberty, passing through, and making themselves right at home in, all kinds of wilderness along the way. But the first time they find themselves in the desert is earlier in the saga. In Genesis chapter 16. Abram and Sarai are wealthy from a successful stint of time living in Egypt. But they have no children. This is before they got their names changed, and before their son, Isaac, was born. Sarai and Abram have been unable to conceive a child. And Sarai is afraid, understandably, for a woman in patriarchal society, that her infertility makes her obsolete. So she does something that had precedent at the time. She has an Egyptian-born slave girl in her service, a girl named Hagar. And Sarai tells Abram to make Hagar his wife, and impregnate her for the sake of Sarai and Abram’s legacy. We don’t hear from Hagar at this point in the story, because she is not seen in her full humanity. Her name just means foreigner. She is seen as a possession, as a foreign object to be used for surrogacy. Abram does what Sarai suggests, and Hagar conceives a child. At this point we start to see some of the ways that Hagar moves the story. ...when she saw that she had conceived, she looked with contempt on her mistress. Then Sarai said to Abram, ‘May the wrong done to me be on you! I gave my slave-girl to your embrace, and when she saw that she had conceived, she looked on me with contempt. May the Lord judge between you and me!’ But Abram said to Sarai, ‘Your slave-girl is in your power; do to her as you please.’ Then Sarai dealt harshly with her, and Hagar ran away from her. The Hebrew word here, for how Sarai treats Hagar, is anah—it’s more than harshness. It means to afflict, to oppress, to humiliate. It’s the same word used in the book of Exodus for how the Egyptians oppress the Israelites when they call on God to rescue them. Hagar rescues herself. You see, she hasn’t met God yet, not on her own terms. No doubt, she has heard all about the faith of her oppressors. But it is doubtful that she would be much inspired personally by the faith of a woman who abuses her. It’s doubtful that she’s compelled by the God of a man who treats her as his property. And yet the living God lingers behind the imperfections and incompleteness of human faith. Hagar runs away, to the wilderness, to escape the system of oppression that she was born into. The angel of the Lord found Hagar by a spring of water in the wilderness. And said, ‘Hagar, slave-girl of Sarai, where have you come from and where are you going?’ She said, ‘I am running away from my mistress Sarai.’ The angel of the Lord said to her, ‘Return to your mistress, and submit to her.’ Now—I don’t know about you—but this was a problem for me when I read it. Not cool, God. You don’t tell someone to go back to their abuser. That’s clear as day. So what are we to do with this passage that’s clouded by such poor divine counsel? There’s a theologian that helped illuminate this passage for me, helped me see that God isn’t meeting with Hagar on theoretical terms, but is with her right in the grit of her actual wilderness experience. The theologian who helped me see this was Delores Williams—a womanist theologian—reading the bible and looking at God through her multifaceted experience of being a Black woman born in the American south. In the figure of Hagar, Delores Williams sees the remarkable resilience of her own ancestors, stolen from their homelands, and enslaved in America. The powerful thing about Delores Williams’ womanist perspective is that she was able to offer a corrective to the male-dominated Black liberation theology of the time, as well as a nuanced opening up of the white-dominated feminist theology of the time.* You see, in both Black theology and feminist theology, at the time that Delores Williams was writing—there was such a strong push for active liberation that, oftentimes, the insurmountably harsh realities of the actual lived experience of Black women was overlooked. If we’re always insisting that conquering the oppressors is the mark of success and salvation, then we will miss how powerful the acts of survival are among the oppressed. In the Hagar story we see a woman who encounters God in the wilderness, who has the audacity to do what she needs to do for her and her child to survive. She needs shelter. When she encounters God she’s in the desert at the edge of death. She needs food and water. So she returns to the household of Sarai and Abram, but she returns as one who has escaped. She returns with power, with her dignity intact. Hagar’s power is the power of those who make a way in the wilderness, who make a way where there is no way. And the angel of the Lord said to her, ‘Now you have conceived and shall bear a son; you shall call him Ishmael, for the Lord has given heed to your affliction. He shall be a wild ass of a man, with his hand against everyone, and everyone’s hand against him; and he shall live at odds with all his kin.’ So Hagar named the Lord who spoke to her, ‘You are El-roi.’ One more thing about Hagar that Delores Williams points out: Hagar is the only person in the bible to ever give God a name.** Hagar names God, El-Roi. God Who Sees Me. Thirteen years ago I submitted my final thesis paper, the culminating project from my seminary education. In it I explored these themes, engaging a womanist perspective, looking for a theology of salvation that was not about escape, but about the power of survival in the midst of a world falling apart.*** I explored these themes because I am inspired and convicted by those who have survived the worst imaginable circumstances, especially at the hands of other humans. At the end of my thesis I struggled with how to bring it home, personally as a white, straight, documented, financially secure man. What do I do with this model of power? How do I respond to the story of Hagar—beyond mere admiration? At the beginning of this essay I said: The most effective way of changing the world is by shifting our focus from what we can’t control to what we can change. I

    15 min
  4. Jun 8

    Melchizedek brought a picnic

    Melchizedek is kind of the Tom Bombadil of the Bible. He’s a mysterious figure. He enters the scene rather abruptly, with no real introduction, and then leaves just as suddenly, with no real explanation. There’s one other possible reference to Melchizedek in the Hebrew bible, in Psalm 110. Some translations have it as a proper name—Melchizedek. Others put it as “righteous king”—which is what his name means in the original Hebrew. And then he plays a prominent role in the Christian book of Hebrews in the New Testament, which lays out some speculative commentary about the figure of Melchizedek. The author of Hebrews makes a case that Jesus is in the spiritual lineage—or priestly order—of Melchizedek. Which is basically saying that Jesus’ credentials and qualifications, his bona fides (or, good faith) comes not from his bloodline or genealogy, but from the way that he lived an authentic life. In other words: The good faith that Jesus practiced and extended isn’t exclusive to any particular tradition. It’s wide open to all of us who are willing to live authentic lives. (More on what exactly that means another time.) So, aside from that one Psalm and the commentary in the book of Hebrews, all we know about Melchizedek is from a few verses in Genesis chapter 14. And like Melchizedek, Genesis 14 itself seems to drop into the storyline from out of nowhere. It disrupts the main storyline about Abram receiving a very personal summons from God to leave what was familiar and set about establishing a new way of being faithful—a way of intimacy with God, and of mutual blessing. This faith journey of Abram is interrupted by the drama of chapter 14, when conflict erupts between a band of five local kings in the Jordan Valley, pushing back against the overreach of four Mesopotamian Kings from far away. Local politics can get messy. Long story short, Abram’s nephew gets captured as a POW in the process. Abram gets word. He trains up his working men to be warriors for the occasion. They give chase. And save the day. (Side note: This wouldn’t have been a short story. Even though it’s brief in the bible, it was not a weekend excursion. There are hundreds of miles of drama and subtext in this story. Abram and his men would have come back changed by this experience. You can imagine them years down the road, out grazing their sheep and cattle, still telling war stories about that time when 318 shepherds conquered four kings.) On their return from this epic quest, Abram is met in the Jordan Valley by the local kings who are grateful for his heroic deeds. He’s greeted first by Bera, the king of Sodom, whose name we know from earlier in the story—whose name means something like “son of evil”. Sodom has a scandalous reputation for the ways that they treat travellers and immigrants, and they have an undignified ruler, and it becomes clear if you read the end of chapter 14 that Abram wants no portion of what Bera has to offer. But when Melchizedek enters the scene, he and Abram commune. This is the first instance—our most ancient echo—of communion in the bible. Melchizedek brings bread and wine and a blessing to serve to Abram. And Abram responds to Melchizedek as you would to someone whom you consider to have spiritual authority. It raises a question: Just what is happening on this occasion of communion? Abram, who will become Abraham, represents the very idea that there is one God. The three monotheistic faiths—Judaism, Christianity, and Islam—hold Abraham as one of their foremost spiritual authorities. Abraham is virtually synonymous with monotheism. But we know that Abraham’s religious context in the ancient Near East was full of deities. There was a whole pantheon of gods to worship and appease. The most theologically radical thing about Abraham wasn’t that he followed God with such ardent devotion, so much as it was that he had the audacity to ignore all of the other gods on offer. Yet, in Melchizedek he sees a spiritual companion, a spiritual authority even. Abram accepts Melchizedek’s blessing. Melchizedek is called the priest of El Elyon—the highest deity in the Canaanite pantheon of gods. Abram’s God sometimes goes by Elohim in the book of Genesis, but in this story, Abram’s God is called YHWH. Melchizedek’s God is the God Most High. The one who dwells at the top of the mountain. The God who reigns. Abram’s God is the God who walks into camp and talks with you in the shade of an oak tree about your family’s future. Their Gods are different. Abram is being courted by a God of radical intimacy. Melchizedek is doling out blessings of peace and righteousness on behalf of the God Who Lives Beyond. Abram and Melchizedek have different Gods, but what they share is a common fervor for being faithful. In the midst of the overarching storyline of faith, the presence of Melchizedek reminds us—on one level—that God was always, already, somehow at work. Before Abram had even really begun introducing the blessings of YHWH to the world, before King David of the Psalms had begun singing his poems about God, before Jesus sat at a table in an upper room with his followers, before the early Christians wrote about their experience of Jesus as the Christ—Melchizedek was serving bread and wine on behalf of God Most High. God is always already at work in the world, before and beyond any particular movement of faith. God is profoundly present beyond any of our names or categories for God. Even the word “God” fails to convey the mystery that it strives to point at. There is an ungraspable universality to all of it. And yet—when Melchizedek and Abram commune—something happens: The universal and the particular throw out a blanket and partake in a picnic together. The fervor of being faithful transcends our differences of expression. And yet, the way that we demonstrate our faithfulness gives expression to the genuine heart of our faith. That picnic between Melchizedek and Abram shows us that some deep, ungraspable, ineffable mystery woes us and compels us to a path of devotion, of faith that shows up in the basic elements of our day-to-day ways of living. Living faith is not about believing a particular idea or supporting a particular ideology. It is not about being able to dominantly prove your point. Living faith obliterates hierarchy and calls everyone to be priest of the Most High God—understanding that the Most High God is ungraspable until we see, and meet, and serve God in our neighbors. This is an all around great idea for anyone inclined to heed it: Treat others with dignity, honoring the spark of the divine in their hearts. But for those who count themselves Christians, it’s more than a great idea. It’s the central mandate. The Christian theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer said that Jesus Christ exists as the community that exists for each other. In other words, as you go about your everyday life, everyone you meet is the Christ. And you are called to priestly action in everyone of those meetings. That’s what we practice when we observe the ritual of communion. We’re reaching back through the stories of what Jesus taught us. And we’re reaching back through the stories that taught Jesus what to teach. And we arrive at this moment of encounter—after whatever battles we’ve been fighting, for who knows how long—this invitation to pause, and have a picnic with the mystery that pulses throughout the entire universe, to commune with that mystery in the only way that we can: By taking and receiving the simple gifts of life, and then turning them into blessings that we serve to others. BONUS: Here’s a fun thing—a reflection that I wrote about communion almost half my life ago. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit arammitchell.substack.com

    10 min
  5. Jun 3

    The Legends of Abraham

    I mowed the lawn on Friday. I was trying to think of the number of lawns I’ve mowed in my day. The number of backyards and front yards that I’ve combed with my feet. The number of maple trees and oak trees and sycamore trees and cedar trees that I’ve high-fived on my way by, back and forth, back and forth. Mowing the lawn, especially with a push mower, is an intimate process. It’s a good way to get to know a place. Walking back and forth and back and forth, around obstacles, touching base with the trees along the way. There’s a way in which this is how the story of Abraham reads. When we meet him here at the beginning of his story his name is Abram. Abram means “exalted father”. Later in the stories God changes his name to Abraham, which means “father of multitudes”. God tells Abram that he will become the father of multitudes. And that he will have a place, a land, to call his own. So Abram sets out on a long walk—back and forth, back and forth, around obstacles, touching base with a couple of nameworthy oaks along the way—all to get to know this promised land that is new to him. I’m going to do three things for us here: * We’re going to get oriented to where we are in the overall flow of the Hebrew bible. * I’m going to summarize the chapters in Genesis that tell Abraham’s story, and I’m going to summarize them far too fast, hopefully in a way that will entice you to crack the stories open and give them a closer look yourself. * I’m going to offer three life lessons that we can take away from the legends of Abraham. At this point on our journey through Genesis we cross a threshold. Up until now in this series we have been in, what we can think of as, mythic time. There are the myths of creation of Genesis 1 and 2, where we meet the spirit of creation bubbling over with delight. Then our mythical ancestors, Adam and Eve, and their expulsion from Eden after an encounter with a talkative snake and an infamous fruit tree. Then their sons, Cain and Abel, who are somehow born into a populated world (mythic time can do things like that) that is established with things like conflict and competition and violence. By the time Noah comes on the stage that violence has gotten out of hand, and Genesis tells of a flood that was already a well known myth in the ancient Near East. And there’s the story of the tower of Babel that we looked at last week, an etiology for the many cultures and languages in the world, while also serving as a subversive corrective to imperial power. These mythic tales carry us through the first 11 chapters of the book of Genesis. Then we’re introduced to Abram, who will become Abraham. And with this introduction we move from mythic time into legendary or historical time. Myths are sacred symbolic stories that explain the origins of things, and that often explore deep spiritual truths. Legends are traditional tales that are—to various extents—rooted in real history. Mind you, not biographical or journalistic reporting. Rather, they tell of the exaggerated and larger-than-life deeds of real human beings. That’s what we’ve got when Abraham enters the scene. Whereas the stories of the myths in the first chunk of Genesis happen in a time-outside-of-time, now we step into the telling of legends that can be mapped out—not with absolute precision, but with some degree of accuracy—on a timeline of history. Abraham, the larger-than-life figure. A wanderer and adventurer longing for a place to land. The consummate immigrant. A whole-hearted follower of his particular God. A partner-friend of God. A family man. A protector of kin. One who honors his father, and nevertheless sets off on his own path. A father of many, in his own rite. And one who sends them off on their own. Deceptive at times. Courageous at times. Often deferential to the demands of others. (Namely: God and his wife. Not necessarily in that order.) Even so, he often speaks his mind. He almost always moves decisively. A man not only of belief but of active faith. He worships in the shade of trees. And practices bloody rituals of covenant. We have about 13 chapters worth of legendary tales about Abraham moving back and forth on the land that God promised him. Here’s the flyover summary: Chapter 12 | Abram differentiates from his father and sets off, heeding God’s blessing and call—by way of the Oak of Moreh. He flees to Egypt to feed his family during famine, and lies about Sarai being his sister not his wife. He gets rich. Chapter 13 | Abram gives his nephew Lot a choice of land. Abram settles the less fertile plot—by the Oaks of Mamre. Chapter 14 | Abram rescues Lot, and encounters Melchizedek. [Stay tuned for more on Melchizedek next week.] Chapter 15 | Abram cuts animals in half to make a covenant (berith) with God, and he dreams of the smoking firepot and torch. [More about that whole affair below.] Chapter 16 | Abram has Ishmael with Hagar. Chapter 17 | Abram (exalted father) gets a name change to Abraham (father of multitudes). And he doubles down on his confidence in God’s covenant with the practice of ritual circumcision. Chapter 18 | Abraham entertains God as a house guest—by the Oaks of Mamre—and intercedes for Lot. Chapter 19 | [Interlude: About Lot, and Sodom and Gomorrah.] Chapter 20 | Abraham lies again about Sarah (who, at this point, also has a new name). Chapter 21 | Abraham and Sarah have Isaac, and send Hagar and Ishmael into the wilderness. Chapter 22 | Abraham is called to bind (akedah) and sacrifice Isaac. (Spoiler: He doesn’t go through with it. A ram saves the day.) Chapter 23 | Abraham buys a burial plot for Sarah. Chapter 24 | Abraham sends for a wife for Isaac from his homeland. Chapter 25 | Abraham remarries and has more children with his wife Keturah. He doles out gifts to his children. He privileges Isaac. And he dies happy. So what might we take away from Abraham’s life and legacy, aside from—you know—three of the most influential religious traditions that have shaped the world, history, and geopolitical relations to this day? 1. Faithfulness is a long walk. There’s a misconception that goes something like this: If I am truly living with faith then I will not have doubts, and I will not experience uncertainty or confusion. But that simply is not the case. A life of good faith is a process of consistently demonstrating the audacity to forge ahead precisely in the presence of the unknown. A life of good faith is a long and varied walk. And it’s never in a straight line. It’s full of obstacles and the uncertainty of promises that seem like impossibilities. So, if you have encountered some obstacles along the way, if you’ve turned this way and that, if you’ve found yourself arguing with God*, disagreeing with God, wondering about why it is that you are even aiming your life toward faithfulness: You’re in good company. You’re probably heading in the right direction. Keep on going. 2. God’s promises invite us to make decisions, and our decisions give shape to God’s promises. One of the most prevalent themes throughout the bible is the theme of covenant. Covenant with God in the legends of Abraham is an active thing. The Hebrew word for covenant is berith—the root of which implies cutting. There are two covenant rituals that Abraham engages—1. the ritual of circumcision, which is a cutting off of a not-insignificant part of oneself; 2. the second is an interesting part of Abraham’s story in chapter 15: Abram said, “God, how am I to know this, [that you will follow through on your promises]?” God said, “Bring me a heifer, a goat, and a ram, each three years old, and a dove and a young pigeon.” Abram brought all these animals to God, split them down the middle, and laid the halves opposite each other… As the sun went down a deep sleep overcame Abram… When the sun was down and it was dark, a smoking firepot and a flaming torch moved between the split carcasses. That’s when God made a covenant with Abram… This is an odd story to us, but not out of the ordinary for those doing business in the ancient Near East. This was how people made deals—literally, “cut a deal”. The parties of the covenant being made would walk between the parts of the animals like a threshold of mutual agreement, saying, essentially, “If I don’t follow through, may I become like these animals.” It was gristly, but effective. We could look at this and determine: Covenant requires blood and sacrifice. And there might be something interesting to theologically unpack (explore and critique) about that. But as I reflected on this idea of covenant I wondered: What is it exactly that we are invited to cut when we engage with the life that God promises is possible? The good life? The life of legacy and blessing? The answer is: I’m not sure. Because there is no universal answer to how you should follow the path of God’s promise. Your particular answer is going to look different from mine, and your answer on Thursday might look different from your answer on Tuesday. But generally speaking, God’s promises will continually require you to cut off one way of going as you decide on another. The word decision comes from a Latin word that means—to cut off. God’s promises will lead us again and again to moments of decision. The most tragic thing that we could do at those moments is—not making the wrong decision but—making no decision. Because it is with our decisions to act that we partner with God’s promises. On the long walk of faith we will of course misstep—we will make decisions that are not aligned with God’s ways—but, on that long walk, we also have plenty of opportunities to get better and better at making decisions that do align with the ways of God. And that’s good news. 3. Blessings are also always callings. At the very beginning of the legends God tells Abram: “I’ll make you a great nation and bless y

    16 min
  6. May 25

    The Tower and the Tongues

    Today we are going to look at two stories. The first one is about a tower. It’s in the book of Genesis, the eleventh chapter. Read it here, if you’re not familiar. The world at the end of this first story is more recognizable to us than the world at the beginning, isn’t it? A world where people have a hard time understanding each other. Makes you wonder: Has it always been like this? Why is it like this? Does it have to be like this? Imagine with me, somewhere, sometime before stories were written down. A man sits by a fire after the family meal, and his little child snuggles in next to him. As the child looks out to the west where the sun is setting in the distance she asks: “Papa? Does anybody live on the other side of that horizon?” “Yes child,” he says. “Are they like us?” she asks. “In some ways they are,” he says. “But in many ways they are not.” “What do you mean?” she asks. And he starts to tell her a story about how everyone in the world used to speak the same language. But she interrupts him, “You mean some people don’t speak like we do now?” “That’s right,” he says. “Then how do they understand each other?” And he tells her something about understanding that she won’t actually understand for years to come, but she’ll remember how it piqued her curiosity when he said, “If you want to really understand someone you have to learn to understand them regardless of the words that you both are using.” Eventually, laced through with her many questions, he gets around to telling her the full story that his mother told him when he was a child, and the one that his mother’s father had told her as a child. The story that he told his daughter would have been a version of the story that we read today, though not like it exactly. Because like every story, it grew as it drifted from generation to generation, and from family to family, and from culture to culture. It shape-shifted to meet the needs of each storyteller and of each of their audiences. You can imagine, at some point, somewhere, someone wrote down the version of the story that we have today, and it makes you wonder: Who was that storyteller’s audience, when he or she or they wrote down the particular version that we have in our book here today? As we read the first story: We drop into a scene where everyone in the whole world speaks the same language. And they’ve clustered together to live and build in one place. And presumably they’ve figured out how to feed themselves and cloth themselves and how to meet their other basic needs, because someone has gotten around to the extracurricular activity of inventing bricks. Up until now they’ve all just built things, supposedly, with stones stacked precariously up on one another. Stones will only stack so high before rolling off of each other. But now they have these well-baked bricks, and they have tar to hold them together. “Let’s stack these bricks to build a city,” they say. “And to build a tower that reaches to the heavens.” They’re not just doing this for shelter, or even for protection. “Let’s do this to make a name for ourselves,” they say. But God scrambles them up in the story. God makes it so that they can’t understand each other, and can’t cluster together to build their own personal little empires. So they spread out, and they abandon their tower, and the name that they wanted to make for themselves is forgotten. The first audience for this version of the story was a nation in exile. The Hebrew people had been displaced from their homelands by the mighty Babylonian empire. In that context someone began writing down these ancient stories for their people in exile. When this exiled audience hears that God confuses the people of Babel and frustrates their endeavor to build a tower, the Hebrew people are hearing a story about their oppressors, the Babylonians, being routed by God. They are hearing a story about how God is against the empire. They love this story. The more you look for it in stories about the God of the bible, the more you will begin to see that God is always finding ways to poke holes in the persistent human impulse to build an empire, whatever form it takes. And it does take many forms. For the Babylonians are long gone by the time we get to our second story, this one is in the book of Acts, chapter two. The Babylonians are gone, but the people are still scrambled up, still talking past each other more so than to each other. They’re still living their lives in the shadows of empire, living against rather than with one another. Nevertheless, a small group of people has gathered, with hopes and a vision for an alternative way of living and being together. Their vision is inspired by the life, the death, and the subsequent reappearance of a recently executed Palestinian man who had some radical ideas about divine love and about liberation from the ways of empire. Go ahead and read the second story, here. The same spirit that hovered over the winds of creation is the spirit that blew in like a gale force and stirred up this small group of people gathered in Jerusalem. It’s the spirit that prompted them to understand one another, each speaking in their mother tongues. It’s the same spirit that scrambled the efforts of the people of Babel. This spirit swoops in often to heighten the drama and compel the movement of many stories in the bible, and elsewhere. It’s seldom predictable. We call it ruah, pneuma, sophia, shekinah. It’s the same spirit that lingers at the threshold of your own becoming—the thresholds of your growth and your creative contribution to this world. The creative spirit is lasting and mighty. It is a holy spirit. It moves the world. It shapes the world. And it will not be defeated by any destructive drive. It will not be eclipsed by any ego-driven endeavors. As you’ll recall, the creative spirit was already there at the beginning. It is always already among us. And it is always already within you. But when we look around and see the world the way it is we have to acknowledge that the creative spirit is not always present in the ways that we live, in the ways that we treat each other, treat the world, and treat ourselves. It takes skill and grace to live by the spirit. What I mean by that is that it is common to live in conflict with the mighty and lasting spirit of creation. But there is a way to live aligned with the power of that spirit. That’s what Pentecost Sunday is about: Living according to the power of the holy creative spirit, rather than against it. Though you’ll begin to see—once you’ve tasted what it is to live by the spirit—that underneath everything else, it’s really what every day is meant to be about. Pentecost Sunday, just invites us to look directly at what it is that compels a life lived by the spirit. And these two stories—of the tower and the tongues—are the perfect stories for us to be looking at to discern what it is that compels a life lived by the spirit. Because one of them shows us what it looks like when we forget the creative spirit within us. And the other shows us what happens when we remember. In the story of the tower of Babel I can’t imagine that God is trying to keep the people from their creative impulse, or from the desire to pursue proximity to God, or from the desire to make home for themselves in a particular place with particular people. I don’t imagine that God was preventing or protecting the people of Babel from any of those things in the story. Yet God scrambles their efforts to build what they were building. Why? To answer this it helps to remember that God is usually concerned more with a person’s motivation than with their behavior. Read that again, let it sink in (and don’t get distracted by whether or not you actually believe in God): God is usually concerned more with a person’s motivation than with their behavior. Which isn’t to say that behavior doesn’t matter, just that there are always distracted and incoherent motivations behind every errant act. So what was motivating the people of Babel? The story tells us: “That we may make a name for ourselves.” Put simply: They want to be famous. Put another way: They are obsessed with what other people think of them. And making something out of that obsession—creating in order to center yourself in the world—this motive is counter-productive to true and lasting creation. In other words: If you are obsessed with praise or critique, in the end, you will create nothing that lasts. You might succeed in making a name for yourself. You may emblazon your name in bright gold lettering on high towers. Your name may indeed be renowned and recognized the world over. But if it is renown that drives you, your creation will not last. For the creative spirit will spill out of the object of your making, and your legacy will be nothing but a husk of infamy. So. We were not created to be famous. And yet, we bear the image of a creator who delights in relation. We are meant, in some way, to be known. To have names and stories that are lived alongside of others who also have names and stories. We are meant to be with one another. The creative spirit of God did not make us to be anonymous. We were not made to be famous, but neither are we meant to be anonymous. So what is it that motivates a life lived in alignment with a lasting and mighty creative spirit? It’s simple, really. Not famous. Not anonymous. But generous. We are made and moved by the holy creative spirit to be generous. Do you see it? In one story, when the people want to make a name for themselves, to build a personal empire, they lose their connection with the spirit of being generous. They stop being oriented toward one another. They stop understanding each other. They stop creating together, and they move away from one another, estranged. In the other story, people have come together from a

    15 min
  7. May 12

    The Motherful God

    As you’ve noticed, no doubt, I’m working through some of the ancient stories in the Hebrew book of Genesis. Gleaning them for wisdom that we might apply to this project of being human, and making things better in the world. That’s what I’ve been doing the past few weeks. I preach about one of the stories on Sunday, then brush them up a little bit to share with you here on Substack. I’ve been tackling the stories in order. Sunday was Mother’s Day. The story that came up for Mother’s Day was the one about Cain and Abel. For the biblically uninitiated, that one’s not a conventional choice for a Mother’s Day reflection. It is a tale about the first man to have ever had a human mother, so there’s that. But in the story he ends up murdering his younger brother. It’s not a feel-good story. But I love a challenge from the pulpit. So I took a swing. Found my angle. And this is what I preached… This story doesn’t tell us how Eve responded to the drama and tragedy between her first two sons. We can only speculate about her grief and confusion. What we are shown are the ways that God mothers Cain through the movements of this story, giving him every chance to become himself—and when he loses himself, to be restored. Stories are meaning-making devices. They help us make meaning of the world—as we’ve seen the past couple of weeks. Two weeks ago, the stories of creation. Where do we come from? How is it that we live in a world so full of wonder? What is the origin of our experience of delight? Then, last week, the stories of our first ancestors and their stumbling out of innocence and into the possibilities and challenges of spiritual maturity. What do we do with this complicated world? Where delight and shame mingle? Where we’re compelled to grow things, birth things, love things—but where it’s also painful, where we must risk harm to grow and birth and love? These sorts of stories are not only about making meaning, but are also meant to change us. They are meant to invite us into personal growth and change. And meant to invite us into making a change in the world, seeing the world as it is and birthing new possibilities. Today’s story of Eve’s firstborn, Cain—like so many of our ancient stories—has been used and explored to make meaning for thousands of years in as many different ways. The meaning that we glean, and the change that we make, every time we read a story, hear a story, tell a story is affected by two things: * It’s affected by the perspective that we bring to the story—how we see the world, our biases and conclusions that we are already holding, affect what we might glean from any given narrative. * And it’s affected by the need that we bring to the story—this is related to the first, we come to stories seeking solutions to the problems that we face; seeking solutions to the problems that we give the greatest weight and priority to. So acknowledging that—acknowledging our influence in the task of reading sacred text and heeding what wisdom might be revealed to us there—I invite you, with me, to purposefully bring a particular perspective and expectation to this story. As we look at this ancient story, let’s look for the mothering ways of God—how the sweet spirit of the divine meets the deep longing of our hearts. And let’s look for how God invites us to participate in more motherful ways—how She moves us to meet the deep needs of our world. When I use the word “motherful” I am borrowing the word and its meaning from the queer, Black author, alexis pauline gumbs, who identifies as a ‘love evangelist’ and calls all humans, regardless of gender, into practices of mothering. A motherful world, she says, is one that is oriented toward ways of being that are most nourishing and lifegiving for the collective, for the common good. Motherful ways are unrelenting in their hope for life, in their conviction that love and creation are more powerful than any form of violence, sickness, or domination. And just to be clear—this reflection that I’m offering here is for everyone. To my brothers specifically—I think one of the most generous responses to Mother’s Day, one of the best ways to honor the mothers of this world would be for all men and male-identified souls everywhere to imbue their masculinity with motherful ways of being. So let’s crowdsource this a bit: What do you think are the qualities of a motherful world? Some of what came through from the folks I walk with at a little church in Maine: Listening. Empathy. To know what it is to be seen. Being present. Accompaniment. Unconditional love. Tenderness and compassion. Touch. Forgiveness. Patience. Hugs. Sacrifice. Joy. Laughter. Hope. Strength. Encouragement. Feeding us. Nurture. You have a list, too, don’t you? Funny how envy doesn’t go on the list, isn’t it? Neither does violence. Or retribution. The motherful ways of God, as we’re about to see in the story of Cain, call us back to ourselves as the remedy for envy. They hold us to account when we’re out of line. And they protect us, in order to provide the space that we need to participate in the processes of restoration. The story begins with Eve becoming the first mother. “With the help of the spirit of creation,” she says. “With the help of the Mother Hen Spirit that hovered over the waters at the beginning of everything—I’ve made this child. Brewed him into being just beneath my heart, and broke the waters and puffed him with breath and filled him with milk.” “With God’s help,” she says. “I’ve gained this child.” So she gives him the name Cain, which means acquired or gained, but we know might also mean learned, developed, grown. Which is good, because Cain has a lot of growing to do as a man. And Eve births another boy, and names him Abel, which means vapor or mist. Which is an interesting choice for a name, but makes sense in this story because this story is not about Abel. This story is about Cain. And Abel’s presence in this story is fleeting from the beginning. Time passes. And Cain and Abel both set out to do what they’re here to do. Cain is growing food and Abel is raising livestock. And then there’s this matter of them both making offerings to God, because we all know that God loves a farmer’s market, and delights when you gather for Her bouquets of flowers. And in the story there is seemingly something about Abel’s offerings that is pure and natural, and there is something about Cain’s offerings that is contrived or forced. And God can see that Cain is struggling to live with the same sort of authenticity that seems to come so naturally to Abel. And Cain can sense that God can see this. And Cain goes into a sulk. Now that’s relatable, isn’t it? We’ve all been there, haven’t we? Focusing so much on the gifts and blessings of others that we forget to live our own authentic lives. We forget that we also have a contribution to make. Not one that we need to force. Not something that we have to do, or that we ought to do, or that we should be doing. Not something that is a responsibility or a duty, even. But a contribution that it is our privilege and joy to produce. It can take a lifetime of practice to learn to recognize what it is that is ours to give. But also, in another way, it becomes clear instantaneously—doesn’t it?—the moment we are doing what we’re here to do. It flows through us as naturally as a river hugging her banks, when we let it flow. Alas, we all too often dam ourselves up with envy and petty resentments. But God is a loving mother, calling us back to ourselves, because God knows that living the life that is ours to live—that that is the best remedy for envy. So God says to Cain, “Why this tantrum? Why the sulking? If you do well, won’t you be accepted?” As if to say: “As often as you focus on a life that is not yours to live, you will be out of line. You’ll stray from your path. Cain, get back to being you.” This maternal wisdom doesn’t sink in for Cain. He’s too bent out of shape. And envy festers into resentment, and resentment decomposes into rage, and rage compels him toward violence, and with the impulse to do violence at the helm: Cain destroys life. Cain kills his brother. Rather than doing the work of living his own life, Cain takes the life of another. And God—who is always confounded by violence—says: “What have you done!?” And this is where we expect God to vindicate Abel, the innocent one, by punishing Cain; by delivering retributive justice. Lex talionis. An eye for an eye. A tooth for a tooth. Which is, after all, only fair. And is itself a legal code that helps to reign in vengeance. In the ancient world, this ‘eye for an eye’ kept punishments from being disproportionate to crimes. But God is always confounded by violence. She doesn’t understand the return of violence for violence. Her way is a better way. The motherful God does always hold us to account when we’re out of line. She is not blind to sin. She does not simply disregard misuses and abuses of power—instead she applies a muscular love that overpowers violence. She makes known to Cain: “There are consequences to your actions. By letting your anger erupt in destructive violence—rather than channeling your passion through creativity—things will be harder for you. Because violence makes things harder. Makes things worse. Violence makes you a stranger to yourself.” This is motherful truth. And here, this is the moment where the story turns on grace. Grace was, of course, always available to Cain, at every turn. But this is his moment of surrender to the unrelenting love of the motherful God. And God always honors our free will. Until we are willing, God’s love does not take root. But Cain surrenders to the grace of God at this point in the story: “I can’t take it!” he says. “What I’ve done has caught up to me, and

    17 min
  8. May 4

    Sparkle and grit: A Garden of Eden story

    You can watch me preach a version of this here. [First a couple of credits: Annette Garber’s Wandering with the Wild Feminine inspires me. And her Daughters of Eve article inspired in general some good chunks of what I wrote here. Thanks specifically to Annette for the Rachel Held Evans quote. Also bringing significant inspo is the permission-giving work perspective that comes through in the style and content of mythologist Martin Shaw’s writings, especially pertinent this week The Fall & The Underworld.] As I sit at the coffee shop in town writing this, I look up and see (as if walking straight out of an essay in Ross Gay’s Book of Delights) a stocky-bodied-bearded-beauty just strolling past on the sidewalk outside the window here, with a backpack containing (I’m imagining filled with) a skein of wool. I know this because he was (I might be wrong about the particular modality, but you’ll get the picture) crocheting a small piece of something that had yet to become what it may yet become. He was crocheting as he walked along, tugging at the yarn that draped out of his backpack and trailed like a tail—like a pet on a leash—ten feet behind him on the sidewalk. And the yarn was a bright teal color with (I promise you this) flecks of sparkle in it. I love us. Humans, I mean. I love us. We are sometimes so entirely ourselves. It delights me. It’s beautiful. I have a high view of humans. I believe in us. I believe that we are capable of incredible acts of generosity and creativity and love and courage. I believe that we are incredibly generous and creative and loving and courageous. And… It is also clear to me that we live well-east of Eden. You know? We do not live in the mythic realm of our first ancestors. We do not live always actually embodying and enacting our true nature and potential as image-bearers of a delighted and creative God. We can still taste it, though—Eden. We still long for it, in a remembering and anticipating sort of way. Some will tell you that the story of the garden of Eden and the forbidden fruit is where depravity enters the scene and eclipses delight. But I don’t see it that way. This mythic story—about our ancestors who ate some fruit that changed the way that they saw the world—is not about original sin. Not as far as I can tell. It’s not a fall from grace. As I’ll point out in a bit, grace actually shows up in a way you might not have seen before. This story about Eden and the fruit and the decisions that Eve and Adam make is a story about life as it is, and what it looks like to move through this life from a living commitment to spiritual maturity rather than resignation to spiritual infancy. We’ll come back to all that, though. First, I want to say more about how to read a story like this. Because there are lots of formative faith traditions with powerful sacred scriptures. And all wisdom texts worthy of the name are full of seeds of good, of liberation, and of healing. But reading scripture—whatever your tradition—is not a passive affair. The seeds of scripture are placed in the hands of those of us who practice the faith. And it’s up to us what we do with them. It’s up to us, and the repercussions are on us. As a spiritual leader working in one of the streams of the Christian tradition, I encourage my faith-kin to recognize that reading the bible is an active endeavor. Think: Messy. Think: Grit. Think: Bodies digging in the dirt. When we engage the bible we are gardeners of meaning. In other words: People of faith are responsible for how their sacred texts play out in our world. And this story, of Eden, the serpent, Eve and Adam has been used by people of faith—almost endlessly throughout Christian history—to subjugate, repress, dismiss, and demonize every daughter, sister, and mother on the planet. Let’s just go ahead and tell it how it is: Throughout history, people of faith have poisoned this sacred text with patriarchal perversions of the truth about who Eve, and every daughter of Eve, truly is. They have said she is untrustworthy. The source of sin. The reason for the fall from grace. The weaker sex. This story has been misused again and again to justify men lording it over women. But we don’t have to keep taking the poison. There is a more nourishing and beautiful meaning that we can glean from this story. What if Eve is, as the story tells us, the life giver and the expander of life? What if she’s the one who is actually brave enough to be curious about what else this life might hold? What if she’s the one who is strong enough to accept the consequences of living a full life—to mature beyond the orchard, to make decisions worthy of her wildness? What if she is the one who is generous enough to extend an invitation to her companion—to invite him too into an expansive life? Of course, the bible itself carries plenty of patriarchal residue in the words and stories. Like Eve’s curses in this story, and the pronouncement that Adam would lord it over Eve. Many many stories in the bible convey a time and culture where male supremacy was assumed to be the right way to order the world, along with other forms of hierarchy (like human over earth, like master over slave)—all of which continue to persist in the world today. Here’s the thing: Many many stories in the bible also contain elements of self-critique and internal cultural corrective. I find that particularly interesting. That if we’re willing to see it, we’ll see how the bible nudges both itself and us away from harmful structures and toward a movement of healing. That’s why I’m kind of tired of wasting energy on blaming the bible itself. The bible is an ancient text that begs interpretation. But we are responsible—as individuals, as practitioners or inheritors of our traditions, as communities of faith—for the meaning that we weave from these ancient texts. As Rachel Held Evans wrote: “If you are looking for verses with which to oppress women, you will find them. If you are looking for verses with which to liberate or honor women, you will find them. If you are looking for reasons to wage war, you will find them. If you are looking for reasons to promote peace, you will find them… If you want to do violence in this world, you will always find the weapons. If you want to heal, you will always find the balm.” If you, like me, are someone who reads the bible as a source for gleaning wisdom, please hear me now—this is not a passive endeavor. We are responsible for actively retelling and recentering the divine delight at the heart of all existence. We are responsible for looking to our sacred stories and using them to make meaning of our reality. That’s how it was for the ancient people who wrote these stories down as well. The God in the story of Eden and the forbidden fruit is a reflection of the theology of an ancient people trying to make sense of their reality. In the world of literature and mythology these kinds of stories are known as etiological. An etiology is a myth that explains the origin of something. In other words, this story is not a divine pronouncement of how things should be. It is a human exploration of why things are the way they are. So the curses that God utters in the tale are not reflections on how things ought to be, they are reflections of our predecessors grappling with how things actually are in the world. You can almost hear them saying in this story… “Look around you. The work of growing things is hard and often frustrating, isn’t it? Why might that be? And feel within you. The labor of birthing things into the world is painful and all consuming. How do we make sense of that? And look at the world as it actually is. Men are obsessed with their own power, aren’t they? Childishly passing the blame, claiming superiority, lording it over women. Does it have to be this way?” You can almost hear them. We live outside of Eden, in the midst of harsh realities and challenging circumstances, confronted with toxic cultures and harmful ways of being. But we have a glimmer within us of what is possible instead. We are called to work toward birthing a better world. We were never meant to surrender to curses, but to fill the world with blessing. Here’s the mistake that we often make—or, at least, it’s the one that I have often made: I look at Eden with a longing to return. I look at my primal memory of Eden—at the Adam and the Eve who both live in me—and I long to place them back in the cool calm of their shame-free innocence. I long for them and for me to unknow good and evil. I long for the bliss of ignorance. I want to spend my mornings strolling with a protective God through an orchard watered by familiar rivers and peopled only with animals who respond to the names that I have given them. But that’s not the world. And whether or not it ever was the world, is not the point. The point is that, unless you wish to remain in spiritual infancy (and, you know, honestly, kind of no judgement if you do, but still, please don’t, because we need you out here, at the fullest edges of your growth) you have to move through the full drama of this story. You have to heed the snake. You have to eat the fruit. You have to put on the skins that God makes for you and you have to make the hard move east of innocence. Then you have to respect the angelic forcefield that—through the grace of God (yep, this is where grace shows up)—keeps you from fleeing back to ignorance every time the brambles snag your resolve, every time the birth pangs strike with their inevitable rush. The storytellers called it a curse, living outside of Eden. Because it feels that way, doesn’t it? Living with knowledge of good and evil. Seeing the ways that evil manifests in this world while knowing in your heart how good it could otherwise and actually be. The most sickening evils extend from perversions of the good. And the more clearly we ca

    18 min

About

Principles, practices, and prayers for living life to the full. arammitchell.substack.com