Consistently Candid

Sarah Hastings-Woodhouse
  • 5.0 (3)
  • TECHNOLOGY
Consistently Candid

AI safety, philosophy and other things.

  1. MAY 14

    #20 Frances Lorenz on the emotional side of AI x-risk, being a woman in a male-dominated online space & more

    In this episode, I chatted with Frances Lorenz, events associate at the Centre for Effective Altruism. We covered our respective paths into AI safety, the emotional impact of learning about x-risk, what it's like to be female in a male-dominated community and more! Follow Frances on Twitter Subscribe to her Substack Apply for EAG London!

    52 min

  2. APR 13

    #19 Gabe Alfour on why AI alignment is hard, what it would mean to solve it & what ordinary people can do about existential risk

    Gabe Alfour is a co-founder of Conjecture and an advisor to Control AI, both organisations working to reduce risks from advanced AI.  We discussed why AI poses an existential risk to humanity, what makes this problem very hard to solve, why Gabe believes we need to prevent the development of superintelligence for at least the next two decades, and more.  Follow Gabe on Twitter Read The Compendium and A Narrow Path

    1h 37m

  3. MAR 2

    #18 Nathan Labenz on reinforcement learning, reasoning models, emergent misalignment & more

    A lot has happened in AI since the last time I spoke to Nathan Labenz of The Cognitive Revolution, so I invited him back on for a whistlestop tour of the most important developments we've seen over the last year! We covered reasoning models, DeepSeek, the many spooky alignment failures we've observed in the last few months & much more! Follow Nathan on Twitter Listen to The Cognitive Revolution  My Twitter & Substack

    1h 46m

  4. 11/08/2024

    #17 Fun Theory with Noah Topper

    The Fun Theory Sequence is one of Eliezer Yudkowsky's cheerier works, and considers questions such as 'how much fun is there in the universe?', 'are we having fun yet' and 'could we be having more fun?'. It tries to answer some of the philosophical quandries we might encounter when envisioning a post-AGI utopia. In this episode, I discussed Fun Theory with Noah Topper, who loyal listeners will remember from episode 7, in which we tackled EY's equally interesting but less fun essay, A List of Lethalities. Follow Noah on Twitter and check out his Substack!

    1h 26m

  5. 10/30/2024

    #16 John Sherman on the psychological experience of learning about x-risk and AI safety messaging strategies

    John Sherman is the host of the For Humanity Podcast, which (much like this one!) aims to explain AI safety to a non-expert audience. In this episode, we compared our experiences of encountering AI safety arguments for the first time and the psychological experience of being aware of x-risk, as well as what messaging strategies the AI safety community should be using to engage more people. Listen & subscribe to the For Humanity Podcast on YouTube and follow John on Twitter!

    53 min

  6. 10/20/2024

    #15 Should we be engaging in civil disobedience to protest AGI development?

    StopAI are a non-profit aiming to achieve a permanent ban on the development of AGI through peaceful protest. In this episode, I chatted with three of founders of StopAI – Remmelt Ellen, Sam Kirchner and Guido Reichstadter. We talked about what protest tactics StopAI have been using, and why they want a stop (and not just a pause!) in the development of AGI. Follow Sam, Remmelt and Guido on Twitter My Twitter

    1h 18m

  7. 10/16/2024

    #14 Buck Shlegeris on AI control

    Buck Shlegeris is the CEO of Redwood Research, a non-profit working to reduce risks from powerful AI. We discussed Redwood's research into AI control, why we shouldn't feel confident that witnessing an AI escape attempt would persuade labs to undeploy dangerous models, lessons from the vetoing of SB1047, the importance of lab security and more.  Posts discussed: The case for ensuring that powerful AIs are controlledWould catching your AIs trying to escape convince AI developers to slow down or undeploy?You can, in fact, bamboozle an unaligned AI into sparing your life Follow Buck on Twitter and subscribe to his Substack!

    49 min

  8. 09/08/2024

    #13 Aaron Bergman and Max Alexander debate the Very Repugnant Conclusion

    In this episode, Aaron Bergman and Max Alexander are back to battle it out for the philosophy crown, while I (attempt to) moderate. They discuss the Very Repugnant Conclusion, which, in the words of Claude, "posits that a world with a vast population living lives barely worth living could be considered ethically inferior to a world with an even larger population, where most people have extremely high quality lives, but a significant minority endure extreme suffering." Listen to the end to hear my uninformed opinion on who's right. Read Aaron's blog post on suffering-focused utilitarianism Follow Aaron on Twitter Follow Max on Twitter My Twitter

    1h 54m
See All (20)

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
3 Ratings

About

AI safety, philosophy and other things.

Information

  • Creator
    Sarah Hastings-Woodhouse
  • Years Active
    2024 - 2025
  • Episodes
    20
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2025 Consistently Candid
  • Show Website
    Consistently Candid

To listen to explicit episodes, sign in.

Stay up to date with this show

Sign in or sign up to follow shows, save episodes, and get the latest updates.
Select a country or region

Africa, Middle East, and India

Asia Pacific

Europe

Latin America and the Caribbean

The United States and Canada