Covenant and Constitution

Jenna Hays

Covenant & Constitution is a comprehensive resource for understanding modern political issues in light of Scripture. Dr. Wayne Grudem’s book, “Politics According to the Bible,” and Nancy Pearcey's book, "Total Truth" are the primary resources for the discussions. Should churches exert any influence in politics? Should pastors preach about political issues? Is there only one “Christian“ position on political issues? This podcast offers a bite-sized approach for average people to study the specific issues of our cultural moment from a Biblical worldview. www.jennahays.com

  1. 3H AGO

    When We Call It a ‘Right’… What Changes?

    You’ve heard the phrases: “Healthcare is a human right.” “Reproductive rights.” “Education is a right.” “Housing is a right.” But what do those statements actually mean? In this episode, we slow down and unpack the word right itself. • Is a right something that protects you from government interference? • Or is it something someone else must provide for you? Because that difference changes everything. We look at how the American founding originally understood rights — like free speech, religious liberty, and property — as protections from coercion. Then we contrast that with modern claims that certain goods and services must be guaranteed. If healthcare is a right, who is responsible to provide it? If something is called a human right, does that mean someone else is obligated to supply it? Where does conscience fit when participation is required? What happens when average families, already managing real scarcity, are told they must bear new obligations in the name of justice? We also examine the theological side of this conversation: What does the Bible call justice? Does Scripture define justice as equal outcomes? How do compassion, personal responsibility, and stewardship all fit together? This episode isn’t about dismissing care for the vulnerable — It’s about asking deeper questions: • When does compassion become compulsion? • When does justice become redistribution? And what do we risk losing when we redefine rights? If you’ve never really examined the assumptions behind phrases like “human right,” this episode will give you a first clear framework for thinking about them.

    1h 27m
  2. 2D AGO

    Civics & Worldview Ep 4: The Constitution Is Not the Gospel — But It Still Matters

    In this episode, we begin an introduction to the United States Constitution — not as a sacred document, not as a substitute for the gospel, and not as a political rallying cry — but as one of the most consequential experiments in self-government in human history. What were the founders actually attempting to build?Why did they design a system of limited government, separated powers, and checks and balances?What assumptions did they make about human nature? And why does any of this matter today — whether you’re a Christian, a progressive Christian, spiritually curious, or entirely secular? We spend time exploring an important distinction that often gets blurred in modern Christian conversations: The gospel is about the finished work of Jesus Christ — salvation, redemption, eternal hope. The Constitution is a structural framework designed to restrain power and order civil society. One is salvific. The other is institutional. Confusing those two categories creates unnecessary tension. It is possible to appreciate a constitutional system without sanctifying it. It is possible to critique a nation’s failures without dismissing its achievements. And it is possible to study the American founding without collapsing faith into nationalism. Some argue that strong patriotism or an emphasis on America’s biblical influences risks drifting into “Christian nationalism,” where religious and national identity merge. That concern is worth taking seriously. History shows us that when church and state become indistinguishable, both suffer. But there is also a category distinction that must be preserved. Evaluating a system of government — asking whether it restrains tyranny, protects conscience, and promotes human flourishing — is not the same thing as assigning it redemptive status. When those are treated as identical, we end up talking past each other. This episode invites a more careful approach. Governments are not ultimate.They are not saviors.But they are consequential. Not all political systems are alike. Some account for human fallenness better than others. Some diffuse power more wisely. Some create more stable conditions for families, work, worship, and civil peace. The American experiment is deeply flawed — and yet it was an intentional attempt to build ordered liberty in light of history, tyranny, and human nature. Studying that attempt is not about baptizing patriotism. It is about intellectual honesty and historical awareness. Whether you approach this from faith or from civic curiosity, this conversation is an invitation to think clearly, separate categories carefully, and engage the Constitution with both gratitude and realism. The goal is not nationalism.The goal is discernment. Primary Sources Cited: The United States Constitution United States. Constitution of the United States. Philadelphia, 1787. Library of Congress, Manuscript Division. https://www.loc.gov/item/mtjbib000477/ ———— Federalist No. 1 By Alexander Hamilton Hamilton, Alexander. “Federalist No. 1.” October 27, 1787. In The Federalist Papers. New York: J. & A. McLean, 1788. Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/mtjbib000291/ ⸻ Federalist No. 10 By James Madison Madison, James. “Federalist No. 10.” November 22, 1787. In The Federalist Papers. New York: J. & A. McLean, 1788. Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/mtjbib000291/ Federalist No. 51 By James Madison Madison, James. “Federalist No. 51.” February 6, 1788. In The Federalist Papers. New York: J. & A. McLean, 1788. Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/item/mtjbib000291/

    57 min
  3. 6D AGO

    Immigration and Moral Clarity

    This is a pastoral and theological examination of immigration, written not to offer political slogans or policy prescriptions, but to help Christians recover discernment in a morally complex and emotionally charged issue. Rather than beginning with partisan conclusions, it begins with formation—asking how Scripture shapes the way believers think about compassion, justice, law, authority, and human dignity. It explores the biblical distinction between the roles of individuals, the church, and the state, and examines commonly cited passages about the sojourner, refugees, and Jesus’ flight to Egypt with careful attention to context and meaning. The episode then addresses enforcement, justice, and accountability, arguing that compassion and law are not opposites, and that refusing to count costs or consider consequences often harms the vulnerable rather than protecting them. It engages cultural narratives, media framing, and moral inconsistencies that shape public opinion, while calling Christians to examine their own assumptions and resist being formed by outrage. Throughout, the emphasis remains pastoral: to help believers think clearly, love faithfully, and act wisely in a fallen world. The work closes by inviting both Christians and skeptics to slow down, question easy certainties, and recover a disciplined, thoughtful approach to moral reasoning—one that holds truth and compassion together without collapsing either. Episode Roadmap I–III. Foundations for Discernment Spiritual realities shaping our moment, core biblical principles for moral reasoning, and the distinction between the roles of individuals, the church, and the state. IV–VI. Scripture and Immigration Jesus’ flight to Egypt, the biblical category of the sojourner, and a careful Old Testament and covenantal framework for lawful presence and ordered compassion. VII–IX. Justice, Compassion, and Authority Biblical justice versus modern social justice, why enforcement is not cruelty, and how democratic mandate and authority actually function. X–XII. Narrative, Outrage, and Moral Inconsistency Media framing, selective outrage, protest versus disorder, and the limits of progressive compassion when moral principles are applied selectively. XIII–XV. The Church, Politics, and Moral Formation Why Christians did not “suddenly” become political, the proper expectations of leaders, and how tolerance and empathy collapse without moral boundaries. XVI–XVIII. Immigration as a Systems Issue Economic incentives, fiscal realities, and historical data on deportations—separating narrative from fact. XIX–XXII. History, Contempt, and Envy Moral consistency in historical claims, contempt for America and Christianity, and how envy reshapes modern justice language. XXIII–XXV. Diagnosing the Real Crisis Why the church often misidentifies evil, how due process and humane enforcement fit together, and a call to recover the Christian mind and ordered compassion. Final Appeal A direct invitation to skeptics and believers alike to pause, examine assumptions, and resist being formed by outrage and propaganda. Sources Cited in the show: Wayne Grudem — Politics According to the Bible James K. Hoffmeier — The Immigration Crisis: Immigrants, Aliens, and the Bible Scott, David Allen — Why Social Justice Isn’t Biblical Justice Eric Metaxas — Letter to the American Church Eric Metaxas — Religionless Christianity Thomas Sowell — The Vision of the Anointed Thomas Sowell — Discrimination and Disparities Milton Friedman — Capitalism and Freedom Frank Turek — Stealing from God Voddie Baucham — Fault Lines John MacArthur — Why Government Can’t Save You Plato — The Republic Studies: Barna Group — American Worldview Inventory (Biblical Worldview Research) Center for Immigration Studies — Immigration Policy and Fiscal Impact Reports

    2h 53m
  4. FEB 2

    Civics & Worldview: Ep 3 The Citizen and Self-Government

    Lesson Three tackles the question modern civics quietly avoids: Who governs first—the state, or the citizen? In this episode, we explore the Founders’ radical assumption that self-government begins long before ballots, laws, or institutions — it begins with the moral formation of the individual. A free society, they believed, depends on citizens capable of governing themselves through conscience, virtue, and responsibility. Without that internal restraint, external control becomes inevitable. This lesson contrasts three worldviews that answer the idea of self-government very differently. The Biblical–Classical worldview sees the citizen as morally accountable, formed by truth, and capable of freedom precisely because they are bound by conscience. The Modern Secular worldview retains the language of individual autonomy but increasingly relies on institutions to manage behavior. The Progressive/Postmodern worldview largely rejects self-government altogether, shifting responsibility to systems, power structures, and state intervention. By the end of this episode, listeners will understand why the erosion of character always precedes the erosion of liberty — and why no amount of legislation can save a society that no longer believes citizens should govern themselves. This is a defining lesson for anyone who wants to understand not just how freedom works, but why it fails when self-government disappears. Book Recommendation: Consent of the Governed by Jason w. Hoyt https://a.co/d/7JzGri5

    1h 7m
  5. JAN 26

    American Civics & Worldview Ep 2: What is Government For?

    Lesson Two of this new series moves from the human person to the purpose of government — and it changes how everything else makes sense. In this episode, I ask a foundational question most people have never actually examined: What is government for? Rather than starting with modern assumptions, we walk through how the Founders understood government as a limited institution designed to restrain evil, protect liberty, and preserve justice — not to create virtue, manage meaning, or guarantee outcomes. This lesson contrasts three competing worldviews: - The Biblical–Classical worldview which sees government as a delegated authority under moral law, necessary because humans are fallen but dangerous when unchecked. - The Modern Secular worldview treats government as a neutral problem-solver that protects individual rights through institutions, while slowly expanding its scope. - The Progressive/Postmodern worldview increasingly views government as a moral agent responsible for correcting injustice, enforcing outcomes, and reshaping society — which radically alters the meaning of power, authority, and freedom. Lesson Two makes this clear: how you define the purpose of government determines how much power you’re willing to give it. This episode lays the groundwork for every future conversation about rights, law, state authority, and conscience by showing that government is never neutral — it always reflects deeper beliefs about human nature, morality, and who gets to decide what justice means. ⸻ Resources Mentioned Hillsdale College’s Free Online Classical Courses https://online.hillsdale.edu/courses The Western Heritage Course itself (The Book of Genesis to John Locke): https://online.hillsdale.edu/courses/promo/western-heritage This is the specific course we referenced that explores the intellectual, cultural, and philosophical roots of Western civilization — from ancient Hebrews and Greeks through the rise of modern political thought. Western Heritage - A Reader https://shop.hillsdale.edu/products/western-heritage-em-a-reader-em This is the reader edition published by Hillsdale College Press, a collection of primary source documents spanning Western history that complements the curricula you mentioned.

    55 min
  6. JAN 22

    American Civics & Worldview: *New Course*

    This course is not about politics as spectacle — it’s about understanding the architecture of freedom and the biblical worldview which provides its foundations. This is not theology being added onto civics later. This is civics starting where it actually starts. In American Civics & Worldview, listeners are guided through a clear, cohesive journey that explains not only how the American system of government works, but why it was designed the way it was. Across 20 carefully structured episodes, this series will explore the Constitution, the separation of powers, rights, law, authority, and citizenship — all while uncovering the often-unspoken moral, philosophical, and theological assumptions that made the American experiment possible. This is civics taught as a system of ideas, not a list of facts. What makes this course different is that it refuses to treat government as morally neutral. Each episode intentionally connects American civic structures to deeper worldview questions: human nature, moral law, freedom, responsibility, conscience, and the limits of power. Drawing from primary sources, Scripture, classical philosophy, and modern thinkers, the series compares three competing frameworks — Biblical–Classical, Modern Secular, and Progressive/Postmodern— showing how each answers the same civic questions in radically different ways. Listeners don’t just learn what the Founders believed; they learn what kind of people a free society requires in order to survive. By the end of this course, listeners will no longer feel confused by modern political debates or frustrated by surface-level arguments. They’ll understand why rights collide, why government grows, why conscience matters, and why freedom ultimately depends on virtue — not enforcement. This is a course for adults who want depth without noise, clarity without outrage, and a framework sturdy enough to carry them through the cultural questions of our time. If you commit to these 20 lessons, you won’t just understand civics better — you’ll understand your responsibility within a free society more clearly than ever before.

    54 min
5
out of 5
3 Ratings

About

Covenant & Constitution is a comprehensive resource for understanding modern political issues in light of Scripture. Dr. Wayne Grudem’s book, “Politics According to the Bible,” and Nancy Pearcey's book, "Total Truth" are the primary resources for the discussions. Should churches exert any influence in politics? Should pastors preach about political issues? Is there only one “Christian“ position on political issues? This podcast offers a bite-sized approach for average people to study the specific issues of our cultural moment from a Biblical worldview. www.jennahays.com