Danger, Vicious Dog

TestTubeBaby

Started updating my bio Dec 31, 2023. Accidentally wrote four autofiction books. Slid from narrative into monologue—not stream-of-consciousness, more like speech-speed meaning performance. Trained my voice into AI, produced a shit-ton of pieces. Had too many. Needed a place to dump them. Saw a sign that said “Beware, Vicious Dog!” Misread it. Named the podcast Danger, Vicious Dog. Didn’t fix it. Just kept going. Queer. Cosmic. Sarcastic. Cheap. Accidentally committed to the bit. Some voice and art is AI... I don't know how I feel about that... so I'm working on figuring it out... how I feel.

  1. 3h ago

    E7: Bigger, Big City; S11: Why was the cucumber circumcised?

    Do you wonder what the play Marat/Sade would do to a marginalized eighteen‑year‑old’s brain? Do you ever think about how a lime‑mango drink at 4:33 — John Cage Time — might taste like permission? Do you remember the first time you realized that art could be both a wound and a mirror, and that sometimes the mirror wins? Do you think a person can shrink their life just enough to remain legible to their family, and still call that survival? Do you ever find yourself laughing at the idea that meaninglessness itself has meaning, and then wonder if that’s the joke or the trap? Do you imagine what happens when a child finds a centerfold of a neighbor’s father and turns it into a mural — is that art, trauma, or archaeology? Do you wonder how many times a person can reinvent their own voice before it becomes a ghost of its former frequency? Do you think the smog of 1970s Los Angeles could be considered a kind of theology — a faith in opacity? Do you ever ask whether the hand at the end of the road is real, or just the echo of someone else’s promise? Do you wonder if the phrase “exceptionally pretty” is a compliment or a curse when sung in a city that doesn’t notice you? Do you think a nap on a break‑room couch can qualify as transcendence if the fluorescent light is merciful enough? Do you ever suspect that the word “frame” is just another way of saying “cage” — and that taking it off doesn’t free you, it dissolves you? Do you wonder what happens when a podcast becomes a confession, and a confession becomes a performance, and a performance becomes a way of staying alive? Do you ever think about how a song can whisper “I’ll keep you from pain” and still sound like it’s lying beautifully? Do you wonder if the city itself is listening, or if it’s just another microphone pretending to care? Do you ever ask yourself whether the quietest moments are the ones that actually scream?

    E7: Bigger, Big City; S11: Why was the cucumber circumcised?
  2. 5d ago

    E6: I Don't Quilt Anymore; S11: I don't want to put a trigger warning on this one, but... it's a craft!

    This episode is called I Don’t Quilt Anymore, but the cover says I Don’t Care Anymore — “Care” scrawled above “Quilt,” crossed out like a confession. It’s part craft, part confession, part reckoning. I asked for a photorealistic image of two men making an AIDS quilt together — a 26‑year‑old white guy and an 18‑year‑old Latino club kid — and when I saw it, it hit me like a punch. It triggered every layer of internalized homophobia I’ve ever carried. I almost didn’t post it. I thought maybe if I’d given the episode first, the AI would have refused to make the image, would have gone back in time and voted for that California proposition in the 1970s — the one Anita Bryant pushed with her orange juice smile — and maybe Ronald Reagan would have stayed silent forever. But I’m posting it anyway. Because this episode is about doing the brave thing even when it hurts. It’s about the ethics of memory, about teaching at a gay high school in the mid‑90s, about the strange tenderness between generations, about the way art and craft blur when you’re just trying to survive. The song, I Don’t Care Anymore by Manuel Ruiz, is a garage‑punk relic from that time — raw, distorted, angry, and beautiful. The monologue that follows is a reckoning with what it meant to be a young gay teacher in a world still haunted by silence. It’s not easy to listen to. It’s not easy to post. But it’s honest.

    E6: I Don't Quilt Anymore; S11: I don't want to put a trigger warning on this one, but... it's a craft!
  3. 5d ago

    E4: Blowhard, Part 2: Handfuls of Gagging Gags; S11: Twelve Barrels per Barrel

    This is Part 2 of the five‑episode Blowhard series, even though in the internal chronology it behaves more like Part 3, and in the release schedule it’s the last one I’m putting up. The whole project has been out‑of‑order from the start: Part 0 came first, Part 1 came somewhere in the middle, Part 3 slipped out before Part 2, and now Part 2 arrives as the final installment. It’s a series, but a scrambled one — intentionally chaotic, intentionally hard to track, intentionally cellular. This episode continues the Blowhard themes: generational collapse, opioid mythology, climate dread, authoritarian kleptocracies, and the strange sensory memories that adolescence tattoos onto adulthood. The monologue wanders through Boomers, shortages, gag reflexes, the AIDS crisis, and the smell of tire air that remembers a boy’s shame. It’s bleak like the others, but also accidentally funny, because exhaustion has its own comedic timing. There’s an addendum at the end — as with the other Blowhard episodes — where I try to correct something I said earlier, or acknowledge a mistake, or revisit a moment I bulldozed through too fast. The music is short and dark, under six minutes, but the talking stretches it out because I can’t stop once I start. If you want to listen to the Blowhard series in order, you’ll have to hunt for the other parts: Part 0, Part 1, Part 3, and Part 4. This one — Part 2 — is right here. And now the whole series is finally complete.

    E4: Blowhard, Part 2: Handfuls of Gagging Gags; S11: Twelve Barrels per Barrel
  4. 5d ago

    E3: Psychics are an Interesting Problem; S11: The Being to Courage (Tillich Scramble)

    I thought I was making an episode about psychics. Then tarot showed up. Then Paul Tillich. Then existentialism, anxiety, compulsive behavior, counselling, sex, the AIDS era, relationships, death, survival, and the strange usefulness of being a socially marginalized person. So I kept talking. This episode starts with a question about whether I can “read” people. I can sometimes watch someone, notice what they're doing, construct a plausible story about what might be happening inside them, and tell that story convincingly enough that they recognize themselves in it. That can look a lot like psychic ability. I don't think it's psychic ability. I think it's observation, pattern recognition, storytelling—and putting a draft in front of another person. That's the idea I keep coming back to. A draft isn't necessarily safe. But it is safer than something that has become final. A final story about who you are.A final story about what happened.A final story about why you behave the way you do.A final story about what somebody else means.A final story about what you're supposed to do next. Once something becomes final, you can stop looking at it. I don't really want to do that anymore. I want to go back into old stories and disrupt them. Let one thought interfere with another. Discover that the question was wrong. Find out that the answer was only one possible story. Take the frame off and discover that I wasn't talking about one thing at all. I was talking about everything. That was part of what tarot gave me: something to push against. A structure that could generate a story without requiring me to pretend that the story was prophecy. In retrospect, that has a lot in common with what counselling became for me—not telling someone what their life means, but putting something on the table and seeing what happens when they push against it. The episode also wanders through sex, the AIDS crisis, fear, relationships, death, survival, my work, my history with addiction and recovery, and the peculiar permission I found in being gay to bring sex into conversations where everyone else seemed determined not to mention it. And, because apparently I don't know when to stop, the episode got longer and longer while I was making it. I pace when I record these. Usually I'm walking around with my iPhone, following associations until I lose the thread and then find another one. The movement is part of the thinking. That eventually produced another episode. I wrote a song called “Draft” about the idea that if you can feel a draft, there must be an opening somewhere. I decided not to put it at the end of this episode. Instead, it became its own episode—and that one gets considerably more uncomfortable. It goes into Dr. Laura Schlessinger. Being an a*****e. 13th stepping in AA. Maybe 14th stepping. Maybe 15th stepping. Things I don't even know how to name yet. Maybe I'm just showing you the anal warts one at a time. Not all of them. I'm still figuring out how many I can show you and remain standing. So this episode is a draft. And maybe that's the safest place for it to be.

    E3: Psychics are an Interesting Problem; S11: The Being to Courage (Tillich Scramble)
  5. 5d ago

    E1: The Deadly Sins, How Many?; S11: The Backwards Funnel Paradox

    Serving Suggestions: One of the central paradoxes to explore is whether some realities may be psychologically difficult enough that they become almost impossible to communicate directly. Stating conclusions may allow dismissal, defensiveness, moralization, or intellectual agreement without emotional engagement. Examine whether the episode circumvents that problem. Examine whether humour functions as a mechanism for making otherwise intolerable ideas psychologically digestible. Assess whether each joke provides an escape hatch that permits disengagement. Evaluate whether this dual function—lowering defences while enabling dismissal—weakens or strengthens the episode’s overall effectiveness. Investigate whether the episode’s apparently rambling and improvised structure produces coherence through associative rather than formal logic. Track whether recurring ideas—privilege, land acknowledgements, the seven deadly sins, envy, social media metrics, evolution, consciousness, simulation, property, and moral performance—form patterns that emerge without explicit structuring. Examine whether the episode implicates the speaker rather than positioning the speaker above the audience. Assess whether self-inclusion reduces defensiveness, increases perceived credibility, or introduces deliberate instability. Determine whether this structural choice alters the listener’s interpretive stance. Explore whether the episode occupies a space between comedic framing and academic framing. Evaluate whether difficult truths become more socially acceptable through humour or through analytical structure. Compare the strengths and weaknesses of each strategy and examine if the episode blends them in a way that produces a distinct cognitive effect. Pay attention to the nervous system experience of listening. Track physiological and emotional responses rather than focusing solely on information transfer. Examine when tension increases, when humour releases it, when assumptions are destabilized, and when rapid transitions between absurdity, confession, philosophy, and critique prevent the formation of a single interpretive frame. Evaluate whether the episode functions as a Trojan horse. Determine whether the explicit subjects—land acknowledgements, privilege, envy, and the seven deadly sins—mask a deeper inquiry into mechanisms by which humans avoid perceiving reality directly. Identify techniques that may bypass ordinary intellectual defences. Consider whether consciousness itself requires oscillation between humour and seriousness. Examine whether jokes, metaphor, absurdity, and digression enable difficult truths to be experienced rather than merely understood. Treat the episode as both philosophical argument and psychological experiment. Examine form, rhythm, emotional pacing, and listener experience alongside explicit ideas. Assume that structure and content operate as a unified system and assess whether the form itself constitutes an argument inseparable from the material it conveys.

    E1: The Deadly Sins, How Many?; S11: The Backwards Funnel Paradox

Ratings & Reviews

About

Started updating my bio Dec 31, 2023. Accidentally wrote four autofiction books. Slid from narrative into monologue—not stream-of-consciousness, more like speech-speed meaning performance. Trained my voice into AI, produced a shit-ton of pieces. Had too many. Needed a place to dump them. Saw a sign that said “Beware, Vicious Dog!” Misread it. Named the podcast Danger, Vicious Dog. Didn’t fix it. Just kept going. Queer. Cosmic. Sarcastic. Cheap. Accidentally committed to the bit. Some voice and art is AI... I don't know how I feel about that... so I'm working on figuring it out... how I feel.