David's Saturday AI Thoughts

David Boyle

Each Saturday, David Boyle reflects on what feels important in the world of AI. Not the breathless hype or the doom. The practical, analytical perspective: what happened this week, what it means for people who use language models in their work, and what to try next. David is Director of Audience Strategies and co-founder of Steadman. He advises organisations from L.E.K. Consulting to the BBC on AI adoption. This podcast is a spoken-word version of his Saturday AI Thoughts newsletter, with different voices for each section.

  1. MAY 2

    The bill and the harness

    David builds the case that flat-rate AI pricing is dying and that the buyer's question is no longer 'how much will this cost' but 'where does the spending compound'. He opens at a Las Vegas buffet that closed on 31st May, then moves to the supplier-side news: three of the four biggest AI vendors switched pricing in the last few weeks (Anthropic stripped bundled tokens out of Enterprise seats in mid-April, OpenAI took Codex pay-as-you-go a fortnight earlier, GitHub moves every Copilot plan to usage-based billing on 1st June, and an Anthropic manager admitted Pro and Max tiers have been outgrown). He brings in two friends' worried voice notes from the buyer side: a friend in Tokyo asking what happens when bills go up five or ten times, and a partner at a professional services firm naming the outsourcing trap. He explains the supplier maths (unit prices falling roughly tenfold a year, his $200-a-month Max plan delivering $500 a day of equivalent API use, unsustainable) and the buyer maths (Jevons Paradox: cheaper energy made coal use rise, not fall). The radiologist is the modern Jevons: Hinton's 2016 'stop training radiologists' was right about the models and wrong about the radiologists. Ten years on the US has six thousand more of them and pay is up roughly seventy per cent. Punchline: the bill rises either way, the question is whether the spending compounds in the model (a utility cost) or in the harness, the layer of instructions, context and workflows that wraps the model (an asset nobody else can buy). Intercom doubled engineering velocity in nine months on exactly that bet. What happened this week: * AI adoption stalls one layer below the executive sponsor, at the line manager: Gallup data (Q4 2025) finds AI use correlates more strongly with managerial endorsement than with tool access. In firm... * The frontier-model leaderboard is now refreshing in weeks, not quarters: The Epoch Capabilities Index now shows GPT-5.5 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Pro above 155, up from GPT-4o's 128 in mid-2024. Seventeen... * Six VC firms, one investment thesis: Linas Beliunas read the published 2026 investment theses of six of the biggest venture firms side by side and found the same handful of AI bets in all of them: ... What to try: * Pick one tool, get fluent, then refine your harness: A leader David spoke to had spent weeks running the same task through ChatGPT and Claude side by side, then asking each to review the other. Gen... * Force yourself to change something on every AI output before you ship it: Came up at a senior training session this week, as the room debated when the 'check, edit, own' model breaks down. Increasi... * Skip the slides, build the page: In a senior strategy session this week, the most-praised artefact in the room was not a deck. It was a web page someone had built to walk teams through their thinki... Read the full edition with all links and sources: https://steadman.ai/newsletters/david/#edition-2026-05-02

    14 min
  2. APR 11

    What a day can do

    Team-level AI infrastructure can precede and contain individual training. The cost of encoding how a team works into shared reusable tools just dropped from hours to minutes with Gen 2 tools (Claude Code + transcripts). A small jewellery company built thirteen shared skills in a day. Step two doesn't just follow step one, it can contain it. What happened this week: * Claude Code now writes 4% of all GitHub commits, doubled in six weeks; Anthropic run rate $30B (up from $9B at end of 2025), Claude Code alone $2.5B; projected 20% of commits by December * Goldman Sachs quantified AI's net labour market drag: -25k jobs substituted + 9k augmented = 16k net monthly loss; entry-level-to-experienced wage gap widened 3.3pp. But CFO surveys put genuine AI ... * Meta's internal tokenmaxxing leaderboard: 85k+ employees, 60T tokens in one month, Zuckerberg not in top 250. Rewards orchestration over outcomes. Incentivise use yes, incentivise maxxing no What to try: * Start with critique, not creation. Brand voice evaluator was diagnosis-only; teams fear proofreaders less than replacements. Nobody fights the spellchecker * Ask what keeps people up at night, not what they want AI to do. First question surveys existing habits; second surfaces unmet needs. Almost nothing appears on both lists * Show your team how others use AI. 515-startup field experiment: case studies alone led to 44% more AI usage, 1.9x revenue, 39% less capital needed ('the mapping problem') Read the full edition with all links and sources: https://steadman.ai/newsletters/david/#edition-2026-04-11

    12 min

About

Each Saturday, David Boyle reflects on what feels important in the world of AI. Not the breathless hype or the doom. The practical, analytical perspective: what happened this week, what it means for people who use language models in their work, and what to try next. David is Director of Audience Strategies and co-founder of Steadman. He advises organisations from L.E.K. Consulting to the BBC on AI adoption. This podcast is a spoken-word version of his Saturday AI Thoughts newsletter, with different voices for each section.