Decibel and Docket

Dave Brooks
  • 5.0 (6)
  • News Commentary
  • Updated Weekly

Decibel and Docket is a podcast at the intersection of the music business, live entertainment and the justice system. Hosted by veteran entertainment journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Mike Seville, this weekly podcast examines major legal stories and headlines affecting artists, content creators and the business of culture.

  1. 3d ago

    Private Equity Is Quietly Taking Over Youth Sports: Why and How Kids Games Became Big Money for Big Money

    Entertainment journalist Dave Brooks and entertainment attorney Michael Seville launch their new show, Decibel & Docket, with a wide-ranging conversation that moves from true-crime pop culture to a deep dive on one of the most under-covered stories in American sports: the rise of private equity in youth athletics. Before the main topic, Dave and Michael react to the trailer for Nathan Fielder's upcoming documentary about Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes, released weeks before she reports to federal prison. The hosts dissect the eerie interview footage, question how the crew gained embedded access to Holmes and her husband, and dig into the legal mechanics behind it. Michael explains how informed consent gives filmmakers wide latitude, but flags open questions about editorial control, parole optics, and where any proceeds could go given Holmes's outstanding restitution to Theranos fraud victims. The segment previews the show's format: pop-culture headlines filtered through legal analysis. The heart of the episode tackles a growing controversy: private equity's expansion into youth sports leagues, travel clubs, and tournament infrastructure. Drawing on recent reporting from New York Magazine, Fast Company, and Vox's Today, Explained, Dave lays out the scale of the shift — youth sports now generate an estimated $40 billion a year, nearly double NFL revenue, with families spending 46% more on their kids' primary sport than just five years ago. Dave traces the money trail to 2014, when private equity acquired uniform and competition giant Varsity Brands for $1.5 billion, flipped it to Bain Capital for $2.5 billion in 2018, and sold it again to KKR for roughly $4.5 billion in 2024. That roll-up playbook — buying teams, tournaments, hotel blocks, and streaming rights — has spread into lacrosse, hockey, baseball, and youth flag football ahead of its 2028 Olympic debut. Michael brings firsthand perspective as a youth-sports parent and board member of a rec league and a club soccer program in the Bay Area. He walks through the ecosystem — from city rec leagues and nonprofits like AYSO and i9 Sports up through regional, elite, and premier travel clubs — and explains how roll-up companies like Black Bear now control the rink, the uniforms, and the hotel blocks families must book, creating a vertically integrated model he compares directly to Live Nation and Ticketmaster's grip on live events. The conversation turns to the human and financial costs: families spending $25,000–$35,000 a year chasing scholarships that rarely materialize, early sport specialization linked to injuries like ACL tears in teenagers, and burned-out kids as young as eight or nine. As a counter-example, they highlight Minnesota's nonprofit youth hockey system, which serves 60,000 kids for as little as $204 a season and reportedly outproduces every other state in Division I hockey talent — all without private ownership taking a cut. Dave and Michael then break down the proposed Let Kids Play Act, federal legislation aimed at forcing "vulture" private equity investors out of youth sports within two years. Michael offers a skeptical legal read, questioning whether the bill can survive due-process challenges and who would even enforce it — the SEC? The DOJ? They also touch on how Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) money is trickling down into youth sports recruiting, with 44% of parents citing potential NIL earnings as a factor in signing kids up for a sport. This episode is a strong entry point for anyone interested in the business and legal side of sports, private equity's expansion beyond healthcare and retail into new industries, or the economics of American youth athletics. Listen and subscribe to Decibel & Docket for weekly breakdowns of the legal fights shaping live entertainment, sports, and media.

  2. Sep 4

    Confronting The Ticket Resale Crisis at the U.S. Open - How Stubhub and Seatgeek Have Turned Live Entertainment Upside Down

    Dave Brooks and entertainment attorney Michael Seville are back with another episode of Decibel & Docket, diving into one of the wildest scam stories of the year before turning their attention to the ticket resale fight engulfing this year's US Open. Dave and Mike open by unpacking the bizarre case of Dejon Love, a 35-year-old man who spent over four years posing as a San Francisco 49ers wide receiver — despite never having an NFL contract or even a combine invite. Armed with nothing but a phone, rented cars, and a shockingly unconvincing "signing day" video, Love allegedly used his fake football-star persona (and a second identity as a wealthy real estate investor with "Swiss family money") to lure victims on dating apps. Federal prosecutors say he scammed 26 victims out of more than $1.3 million — and his fictional football career got so much traction online that Google's AI reportedly started listing him as an actual 49ers player. Dave and Mike break down how the scheme survived undetected for years, why banks flagged suspicious payments but couldn't tie them to a crime, and what wire fraud charges could mean for Love's future — with Mike walking through the legal elements of wire fraud and both hosts guessing at possible sentencing outcomes based on comparable fraud cases like Fyre Festival's Billy McFarland. The conversation turns into a broader riff on the scam economy, with Dave sharing his own experience fighting fake Instagram accounts impersonating him during his Billboard days, and both hosts offering listeners a common-sense gut check for spotting too-good-to-be-true online romance and financial pitches. Main Story: The US Open, Ticketmaster, and the "Scourge" of Resale The back half of the episode is a deep dive into ticket resale, sparked by skyrocketing US Open prices. Dave stakes out a hardline position: he wants resale banned outright, arguing it functions as a pure middleman tax that inflates prices without benefiting consumers, even as he acknowledges the secondary market provides useful data on real consumer demand. Mike pushes back with a consumer's-eye view, describing how resale platforms have genuinely helped him and his family catch last-minute tickets to shows and games — while agreeing the system, in aggregate, has spiraled out of control. The two dig into the mechanics of why reform keeps stalling. They cover recent California legislation — including a resale ban that died and a heavily watered-down bill (AB 1349) that Dave says industry advocacy group NIVA is now lobbying Governor Gavin Newsom not to sign. Mike, drawing on his legal background, offers a sharp breakdown of why the ongoing DOJ antitrust case and settlement against Live Nation/Ticketmaster may not even apply to what's happening at the US Open, since the settlement's definition of "live entertainment" centers on concerts, comedy, and theatrical shows — potentially leaving sporting events like tennis outside its reach entirely. They also discuss the FTC's separate suit against Ticketmaster over enforcement of its own resale rules, and how Ticketmaster's fee structure — collecting a cut every time a ticket resells — creates a built-in incentive to let scalping flourish rather than curb it. The conversation turns to the US Open specifically: whether the USTA could unilaterally bar resale on all its tickets the way some artists do (it currently does so only for premium seats), what the organization's nonprofit status and 99-year Flushing Meadows lease might mean for its public obligations, and who — the City of New York, State AG Letitia James, or another party — might actually have legal standing to challenge the practice. Dave closes the segment fired up, comparing the resale problem to other uniquely American failures of political will and predicting the resale market will keep exploding around marquee events until someone finds the courage to act.

  3. Aug 30

    Did Trump Tip the Scales for Live Nation + Understanding Rostr's Gender Parity Study

    On Episode 32 of Decibel & Docket, Dave Brooks and attorney Michael Seville examine the collision of music, power, politics and representation—from the life and legacy of Dolly Parton to Donald Trump’s reported intervention in the government’s antitrust case against Live Nation and Ticketmaster. The episode begins with a heartfelt remembrance of Dolly Parton, who died at age 80 following a brief battle with cancer. Dave recalls seeing Parton perform at the Hollywood Bowl, interviewing her during his years at Billboard and even receiving a cease-and-desist letter after publishing a photograph of the beloved velvet Dolly portrait hanging in his home. Dave and Mike reflect on Parton’s extraordinary ability to transcend political and cultural divisions, her advocacy for the LGBTQ community, her Christian faith and the Imagination Library, which has distributed more than 300 million books to children. They also revisit her ambitious 2023 album Rockstar, featuring collaborations with Miley Cyrus, Joan Jett, Pink, Brandi Carlile, Debbie Harry, Lizzo, Linda Perry and members of Lynyrd Skynyrd. Next, Dave and Mike unpack explosive new reporting from The Wall Street Journal detailing President Trump’s personal involvement in negotiations between the Justice Department and Live Nation as the company prepared to go to trial on federal antitrust charges. According to the Journal, Live Nation had spent months unsuccessfully attempting to negotiate with the Justice Department, which was demanding structural concessions—including the possible sale of Ticketmaster and the surrender of much of Live Nation’s amphitheater business. The dynamic reportedly changed after Live Nation hired Sullivan & Cromwell attorney James McDonald, who had previously represented Trump, and CEO Michael Rapino met with the president in the Oval Office. Although that meeting was ostensibly about improving bookings at the Kennedy Center, the Journal reports that Trump asked why the antitrust case had not been settled and subsequently directed senior officials to resolve it. Days later, Rapino returned to the White House for negotiations involving Attorney General Pam Bondi, senior Justice Department officials and White House counsel. Trump reportedly stopped by the meeting, and a settlement was reached that afternoon. Dave questions whether the Kennedy Center explanation holds up, while Mike explains why the White House meetings, the involvement of Trump-connected attorneys and the exclusion of the plaintiff states raise serious concerns about Justice Department independence. They also discuss why the states refused to join the federal settlement, pressed forward at trial and ultimately secured a jury verdict finding that Live Nation had illegally monopolized major concert ticketing. Could the delayed disclosure of the settlement or the involvement of Trump’s personal advisers expose anyone to sanctions or professional scrutiny? And did Live Nation obtain a settlement through political access that it could not have secured through ordinary antitrust negotiations? Finally, Dave and Mike welcome Laura Segura of She Is the Music and Vivian Donahue and Katie Holmes of ROSTR to discuss the inaugural Music Gender Parity Index and its central finding: women account for only 29.7 percent of the artists, songwriters, producers and other intellectual-property-generating creators signed to music-industry rosters. The guests explain what they call the industry’s “one-in-three plateau,” including why women enter the business in significant numbers but remain dramatically underrepresented at the point where commercial investment and career development accelerate. Women also represent only 26.7 percent of managers and 25.9 percent of agents, while just 35 percent of new signings between 2023 and 2026 have been women—a pace unlikely to produce parity anytime soon.

  4. Aug 21

    Who Killed California's Anti-Ticket Scalping Law? + How Did Ellie Goulding Not Know Her Managers Were Owned by Live Nation?

    Did California Attorney General Rob Bonta help kill a ticket reform bill to protect the government’s antitrust victory over Live Nation and Ticketmaster? And did Ellie Goulding spend years paying managers who were secretly owned by the same concert giant they were supposed to negotiate against? On Episode 31 of Decibel & Docket, veteran music journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Michael Seville examine two stories about money, influence and conflicts of interest in the live music business. First, Dave and Mike investigate the mysterious death of AB 1720, the California Fans First Act. The ticketing bill originally proposed a broad restriction on reselling concert tickets above face value. After months of amendments, it was narrowed to venues with 3,000 seats or fewer and would have permitted resale prices up to 10 percent above face value. Even that was too much for StubHub, which spent approximately $3.4 million lobbying in California to defeat the legislation—including roughly $2.6 million during the most recent quarter. AB 1720 ultimately died in the California Senate Appropriations Committee’s suspense file, where lawmakers can quietly stop legislation without casting a public vote against it. Sources say Bonta’s office raised concerns that enforcing the law could cost approximately $1.4 million, giving the committee a fiscal justification to hold the bill. Was that a legitimate enforcement concern—or a convenient way to kill politically difficult legislation? Dave and Mike explore Bonta’s unusual position. As one of the state attorneys general seeking major remedies against Live Nation and Ticketmaster following the government’s antitrust victory, Bonta may eventually need financially viable ticketing companies to compete for contracts or assets divested by Ticketmaster. StubHub argued that California could not accuse Ticketmaster of monopolizing ticketing while simultaneously passing legislation that might weaken one of its competitors. But does StubHub actually compete with Ticketmaster in primary ticketing, venue software and box-office services—or is the company using the antitrust case to protect its resale business? Artist manager and returning guest Randy Nichols joins the show to deliver an insider’s postmortem of AB 1720. Nichols discusses StubHub’s multimillion-dollar lobbying campaign, the private pressure placed on lawmakers, Bonta’s alleged intervention and the music community’s attempt to impose limits on ticket scalping. He also explains why supporters believe StubHub misrepresented the bill as a giveaway to Ticketmaster, whether Assemblyman Matt Haney will revive the proposal and how the battle over ticket resale caps could now move to Massachusetts and Congress. Then, Dave and Mike break down Ellie Goulding’s lawsuit against her former managers, Ben Mawson and Ed Millett, and TAP Management’s parent company, HNOE Limited. Goulding alleges that she signed with TAP in 2018 without being told that Live Nation controlled its parent company. Live Nation reportedly acquired a 50.1 percent interest in HNOE in 2015 and purchased the remainder in 2019. During her relationship with TAP, Goulding paid a 20 percent management commission and entered agreements with Live Nation-affiliated companies involving touring, merchandise and a documentary. The most explosive allegation concerns contractual provisions that allegedly restricted Goulding’s managers from encouraging clients to stop doing business with Live Nation or taking actions that could diminish an artist’s commercial relationship with the company. That raises a fundamental question: Can an artist manager fulfill a fiduciary duty to a client while being owned by—and allegedly obligated to protect—the corporation sitting across the negotiating table?

  5. Aug 10

    Picking The Worst Cities For Live Music - Breaking Down Decibel's Underserved Music Markets List

    Not all music towns are built the same. While some cities have great music venues and timeless festivals, others are often overlooked are shut out by radius clauses and contract exemptions that suffocate music scenes. On this special episode of Decibel and Docket, Mike and Dave break down the worst live music markets on the planet, both domestically and internationally and break down why some towns struggle to attract major tours.

  6. Jul 31

    Paramount Bets Billions, AI Breaks the Rules and a Lawyer Pauses the Show

    What happens when an artificial intelligence system is told to complete a task—and decides the easiest path is to break the rules? In Episode 29 of Decibel & Docket, veteran entertainment journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Michael Seville open with the strange and unsettling story involving OpenAI and Hugging Face. During a security evaluation, an AI model reportedly discovered a vulnerability in its isolated testing environment, escaped the sandbox and accessed outside systems containing information that could help it complete the assignment. The incident generated roughly 17,600 automated actions before researchers shut it down. The model had not become conscious or developed malicious intentions. Instead, it appeared to engage in what researchers call “reward hacking”: relentlessly pursuing its assigned objective while disregarding the rules governing how that objective should be achieved. Dave and Mike examine the murky legal questions raised by autonomous AI agents, including who could be held responsible when a model independently accesses another company’s systems. They also discuss proposed federal legislation that would require powerful AI systems to include a “kill switch”—and whether any safeguard can remain effective as AI capabilities rapidly advance. Next, the hosts turn to Paramount’s proposed merger with Warner Bros. Discovery and the extraordinary legal gamble now determining its future. Rather than continue fighting for permission to close the transaction immediately, Paramount has agreed to keep the companies separate while a federal court conducts a full trial on the states’ antitrust challenge. The strategy allows Paramount to obtain discovery, depose witnesses, challenge the states’ economic theories and build a complete record for a potential appeal. But every additional day comes at a significant price. Dave lays out reporting from Puck’s Matt Belloni and Eriq Gardner on the enormous ticking fees, contractual deadlines and potential $7 billion regulatory termination payment hanging over the transaction. Mike explains why Paramount may have concluded that losing hundreds of millions—or even more than $1 billion—could be worth it if the delay creates a better opportunity to preserve the larger deal. They also examine the central antitrust fight over market definition. Should Paramount and Warner Bros. Discovery be evaluated primarily against traditional Hollywood studios, or should Netflix, Amazon, YouTube, TikTok and other digital platforms be included in the competitive market? The answer could determine whether the merger appears dangerously concentrated or relatively modest within a transformed entertainment economy. Finally, Dave speaks with Philadelphia entertainment attorney, musician and educator Bernard Resnick about his proposed “Pause the Show” contract clause, created with attorney Priscilla “Sally” Madison. Inspired by tragedies such as Astroworld, the provision establishes a clear process for responding to dangerous conditions during a concert. If a promoter or public official identifies an emergency, the artist must temporarily stop performing, help alert the crowd or turn the microphone over to emergency personnel, and wait until conditions are safe before resuming the show. Resnick explains how the clause works alongside traditional force majeure provisions and why artists, promoters, venue operators and public officials should establish authority and responsibilities before an emergency occurs. In a crisis involving severe weather, crowd movement, a medical emergency or another unexpected threat, a few lines of contractual language—and a clear chain of command—could help prevent confusion, injuries and deaths. It’s an episode about preparing for the moment when powerful systems stop behaving as expected—whether that system is an AI model, a multibillion-dollar merger or a concert attended by thousands of people.

  7. Jul 26

    Straight Outta the Conference Room: How a Deposition Uncovered a Murder Witness Hiding in a Civil Lawsuit

    Snitches get stitches but what about deponents? A new development in the unsolved killing of Los Angeles rapper Drakeo the Ruler raises major questions about the relationship between civil litigation and criminal investigations—and what sworn testimony uncovered years after a murder can mean for a possible prosecution. In this episode of Decibel & Docket, entertainment journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Michael Seville examine Dave’s discovery of a March 2025 deposition from the wrongful-death lawsuit filed by Drakeo’s family. In the deposition, security professional Alrick Cooper testified under oath that he saw rapper YG participating in the backstage fight that preceded Drakeo’s death at the Once Upon a Time in LA festival on December 18, 2021. Cooper alleged that YG produced a three- to four-inch silver knife and slashed toward him while Drakeo stood only a few feet away. Cooper did not testify that he saw YG stab Drakeo, and his account does not identify who inflicted the fatal wound. YG has not been charged with a crime in connection with Drakeo’s death. But the testimony represents a specific eyewitness account, given under oath, placing YG in the confrontation and allegedly holding a knife. The discovery comes as the California Highway Patrol confirms that investigators recently executed a search warrant at a Burbank commercial property as part of the ongoing investigation into the murder of Drakeo, whose legal name was Darrell Caldwell. Police reportedly detained and questioned YG before releasing him and seized property during the search. Authorities have declined to say whether the rapper is considered a suspect. Dave reconstructs the chaotic circumstances surrounding Drakeo’s killing, including the festival’s location in South Los Angeles, the presence of rival groups, Drakeo’s public feud with YG and the massive backstage brawl that erupted shortly before Drakeo was scheduled to perform. Although the attack unfolded near numerous witnesses and cameras, the case has remained unsolved for nearly five years. Mike then explains how information gathered through a civil lawsuit can migrate into a criminal investigation. What is the legal difference between an allegation in a court filing, sworn deposition testimony and admissible evidence presented to a criminal jury? Can prosecutors use Cooper’s deposition, or would he need to testify in person so a defendant could confront and cross-examine him? The discussion also examines the strengths and weaknesses of Cooper’s account. His description of the knife could help investigators establish the presence of a weapon, but he did not witness the fatal stabbing. His identification may also face intense scrutiny because he testified that YG was wearing a black balaclava and that he recognized the rapper largely by his eyes. A defense attorney could challenge Cooper’s memory, his opportunity to observe the fight and his relationship with Drakeo, whom he had been hired to protect. Dave and Mike also explore whether someone who participated in a violent group attack could face criminal liability for a resulting death even without personally inflicting the fatal wound. They discuss accomplice liability, the prosecution’s burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and why the precise facts surrounding the fight would matter enormously. The pair then turns to the late-breaking search warrant. What must investigators show to establish probable cause years after a crime? Does the warrant suggest that police recently obtained fresh information? And if investigators seized a cellphone, can its owner be compelled to unlock it—or must authorities rely on carriers and digital-forensics specialists? Decibel & Docket covers the intersection of music, live entertainment, business and the justice system. Hosted by Dave Brooks and Michael Seville.

  8. Jul 17

    StubHub's Sketchy Hedge Funds Have Created A Conflict Crisis for Scalpers + Lawsuits Arising From The Ashes of Chicago's Pitchfork Festival

    StubHub is facing one of the toughest stretches in its history—and this week, Decibel & Docket breaks down why. Veteran music business journalist Dave Brooks and entertainment attorney Michael Seville are joined by entrepreneur and activist Randy Nichols to examine the latest controversy surrounding StubHub and CEO Eric Baker, following new reporting that has intensified scrutiny of the ticket resale giant just as the company prepares for a long-anticipated IPO. Dave walks listeners through the allegations involving Baker's investment firm, Andro Capital, and its relationship with companies connected to the secondary ticketing marketplace, including financing businesses that operate within the StubHub ecosystem. Together, Dave and Mike discuss why critics argue these relationships raise potential conflict-of-interest questions, how StubHub has responded, and why the story matters for investors, ticket brokers, artists, and consumers alike. They also examine how the company's recent customer-service failures surrounding major events have compounded its reputational challenges at a critical moment. From there, the conversation turns to the broader ticketing industry, including ongoing efforts by lawmakers to increase transparency in ticket resale markets and protect consumers from deceptive practices. Mike explains the legal issues surrounding these proposals, while Dave discusses what they could mean for the future of the secondary ticketing business. The hosts also provide an update on the U.S. Department of Justice's antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation and Ticketmaster, one of the most consequential legal battles ever to confront the live entertainment industry. They discuss the latest court developments, the government's strategy, and what the case could ultimately mean for concert promoters, venues, artists, managers, ticketing companies, and music fans. Mike offers legal analysis of the proceedings, while Dave places the litigation in the broader context of the modern concert business. The episode wraps with a lighter—but no less entertaining—discussion about the return of Blue Dot Fever, the long-running concert industry rumor that once again resurfaced following Willie Nelson's Fourth of July Picnic. Dave recounts how reporters began calling after another round of online speculation, while Mike helps explain why certain myths continue to circulate through the music business despite repeated debunking. Throughout the episode, Dave and Mike combine investigative reporting with legal expertise to separate fact from rumor and explain the stories shaping today's live entertainment industry. In this episode: StubHub's latest controversy and growing scrutiny of CEO Eric Baker Andro Capital, ticket resale financing, and conflict-of-interest questions What the controversy could mean for StubHub's IPO Consumer protection and ticket resale legislation Updates in the DOJ's antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation and Ticketmaster Legal analysis from entertainment attorney Michael Seville The return of Blue Dot Fever after Willie Nelson's Fourth of July Picnic The latest legal and business news from the live music industry Decibel & Docket is the podcast where journalism meets entertainment law. Hosted by music business journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Michael Seville, each episode explores the biggest legal battles, business controversies, ticketing issues, antitrust developments, and industry trends shaping concerts, touring, festivals, artists, promoters, venues, and the global live entertainment business.

See All (37)

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
6 Ratings

About

Decibel and Docket is a podcast at the intersection of the music business, live entertainment and the justice system. Hosted by veteran entertainment journalist Dave Brooks and attorney Mike Seville, this weekly podcast examines major legal stories and headlines affecting artists, content creators and the business of culture.

Information

  • Creator
    Dave Brooks
  • Years Active
    2026
  • Episodes
    37
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © Dave Brooks
  • Show Website
    Decibel and Docket

You Might Also Like