Dr. John Campbell

Campbellteaching

Hello Everyone, My name is John Campbell and I am a retired Nurse Teacher and former clinical nurse based in England. I also do some teaching in Asia and Africa when time permits. These videos are to help students to learn the background to all forms of health care. My PhD focused on the development of open learning resources for nurses nationally and internationally. LinkedIn profile, https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-john-campbell-5256223b/ Twitter, https://twitter.com/Johnincarlisle Disclaimer; These media including videos, book, e book, articles, podcasts are not peer-reviewed. They should never replace individual clinical judgement from your own health care provider. No media-based material on this channel is suitable for using as professional medical advice. All comments are also for educational purposed only and must never replace advice from your own health care provider

  1. 2h ago

    Vaccines and increasing infections

    To message Danie, https://www.tiktok.com/@danielshep60?lang=en Pick and mix, mix and match https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/10/21/covid-delta-variant-live-updates/ Moderna and Johnson & Johnson can now have boosters Rochelle Walensky Choose any of the three boosters now authorized, regardless of original shot The evidence shows that all three COVID-19 vaccines authorized in the United States are safe, as demonstrated by the over 400 million vaccine doses already given And, they are all highly effective in reducing the risk of severe disease, hospitalization, and death, even in the midst of the widely circulating delta variant FDA, did not recommend any particular combination of vaccines and boosters to switch or to stick CDC, still working it out Advisory panel member Pablo J. Sanchez, pediatrician, Ohio State I agree that those who received a [Johnson & Johnson] vaccine should receive a second dose, I would prefer that those individuals get an mRNA vaccine FDA has authorized A third shot of Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech anyone 65 and older any adults at high risk of severe, underlying conditions, job exposure, institutional settings At least six months since their second dose Johnson & Johnson recipients Anyone 18 and older At least two months since getting the shot In the fully vaccinated 105 million people, Pfizer series 70 million people, Moderna series 15 million people, Johnson & Johnson single shot More than 11 million people boosted so far UK https://covid.joinzoe.com/data#levels-over-time https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk CMOs slides https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/slides-to-accompany-coronavirus-press-conference-20-october-2021 Sajid Javid, cases could rise to 100,000 per day this winter Sage October report https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1027514/S1381_SAGE_96_minutes.pdf Risk posed by further viral evolution, that becomes dominant globally is a very real possibility Therefore need for: Capacity to monitor for variants Conduct predictive vaccinology Winter and into 2022 Hospital admissions above the level seen in January 2021 are increasingly unlikely https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/healthcare Uncertainties, behaviour change and waning immunity Co-circulation and co-infection of SARS-CoV-2 with Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and influenza Symptoms of any respiratory infection, stay at home Russia Deaths, + 1,000 per day https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-58998366 Vologda, Hospital Number One 26% of patients vaccinated Covid patients, 750 Unvaccinated, 700 The scale of new infections and deaths has alarmed authorities so much that All workplaces, shut down for a week from the start of November Moscow, closing non-essential services for 11 days from next Thursday Very low vaccine uptake Years of scepticism of authorities Anti-vaxxers, social media Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

  2. 3h ago

    Shroud, Questioning Its Authenticity

    With Dr. Richard Sorensen. Shroud of Turin Website, https://shroud.com/ Links for Rich, YouTube videos: "Biblical Mysteries Explained" https://www.youtube.com/@BiblicalMysteriesExplained Article sites: academia.edu, researchgate.net, richardsorensen.com, unholygrail.net/blo Watch this excellent film from David Rolfe, https://whocanhebe.com/Stream.html Watch this excellent film from David Rolfe, https://whocanhebe.com/Stream.html Link to download my PowerPoint, https://drjohncampbell.co.uk/ Shroud.com https://www.shroud.com/menu.htm Shroudphotos.com https://shroudphotos.com 3D Image https://shroud3d.com/introduction/3d-studies-of-the-shroud-of-turin-history/ Shroud fabric https://www.shroud.com/pdfs/ssi3233part3.pdf 3D reconstruction https://www.shroud.com/pdfs/ssi3233part3.pdf STURP conclusions https://www.shroud.com/78conclu.htm Study on radiocarbon result https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0040603104004745 New dating study on X ray scattering https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/5/2/47 Polon studies https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:210758-1 The Shroud of Turin is purported to be the burial shroud of Jesus Christ, and its authenticity has thus aroused intense and sometimes hostile debate between those who believe that the Shroud is authentic, and those who do not. Accepting or rejecting the authenticity of the Shroud is to many an issue of Christian or anti-Christian conviction. This is especially true for anti-Christians - if the Shroud is a fake it doesn't really affect the pro-Christian side, but if it is authentic then it is dramatic evidence in favor of it. So the Shroud of Turin is the most highly and intensively studied artifact in the history of the world. "Somewhere between 100,000 and 150,000 scientific man-hours have been spent on it, with the best analytical tools available” according to one source. 2. Please note that this is not about "proof" in the scientific sense because it is not possible to prove anything historical. For example, we can't prove that Julius Caesar lived, so likewise we can't prove that the Shroud was the burial cloth of Christ. What we can do is examine the evidence that supports or challenges that assertion. Regardless of conviction, those who seriously seek to study the Shroud should approach it with an open mind and suspend their religious persuasions as they examine the evidence, both pro and con. 3. Regardless of our convictions, it is right that we should question the Shroud and approach it with skepticism because the history of religious artifacts is filled with fraudulent attempts to make money at the expense of naïve worshippers. Many fake shrouds have been produced, and in 1902 a researcher claimed that there were forty-two medieval shrouds of Christ around Europe. However, they were not intended to deceive anyone - most were either simply pieces of cloth or artistic copies, and some of these “shrouds” still exist. Scientific challenges 1. There have been many attempts to debunk the Shroud, and perhaps the main one is in regard to dating. The Carbon 14 dating in 1988 indicated that the cloth was medieval (1260 to 1390 AD). However, it was later discovered that the pieces used for testing contained rewoven fibers that had been used to repair the cloth, so the C14 dating was discredited. A new non-destructive method of dating ancient textiles known as WAXS (wide-angle x- ray scattering) has been developed which operates by detecting the degree of structural degradation of threads from a cloth. Using that method a thread from the Shroud was dated to the same period as a line fragment from the siege of Masada (55-74 AD), so it places the Shroud in the era of Christ's death and resurrection, ca. 33 AD. No other grave cloth in history has ever had an image on it like the Shroud. Other scientific challenges have claimed that the Shroud was: 2. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    Shroud, Questioning Its Authenticity
  3. 4h ago

    Cardiac health with Dr. Aseem Malhotra

    Dr. Aseem Malhotra, physician, cardiologist, medical researcher and author. Link to Aseem’s You Tube channel (subscribe to help distribution of this work) Link to evidence based medicine event on 7th November. https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/has-big-pharma-hijacked-evidence-based-medicine-tickets-444525075467?fbclid=IwAR3zTx2WH8ojp9CzlnLlZiqCimXP0fk8inT-krfT9-IgyI9-IbAgEydcLt0 Recent papers from Aseem Part 1 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363759427_Curing_the_pandemic_of_misinformation_on_COVID-19_mRNA_vaccines_through_real_evidence-based_medicine_-_Part_1 Part 2 https://insulinresistance.org/index.php/jir/article/view/72 So the heart is a muscular structure, tell us about this muscle What happens if this myocardium becomes inflammed? What can cause myocarditis? How would you recognise myocarditis? What are the possible outcomes of myocarditis? How much myocarditis are we seeing now and has this incidence changed of late? Then much the same series of questions for pericarditis Getting back to the myocardium, if this is an actively contractile muscle, I guess it needs a good blood supply? What can go wrong with these coronary arteries? What is this atherosclerosis and atheroma? How long does it take for this furring up of the coronary arteries to develop? Any changes in the rate of development in recent times? What is a coronary arterial plaque, how can this lead to clots? Can inflammatory processes lead to plaque instability? What is a MI, is this the same as a heart attack? What is a cardiac arrest? How would a cardiac arrest be treated? What is the difference between a heart attack and heart failure? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    Cardiac health with Dr. Aseem Malhotra
  4. 6h ago

    CDC, natural immunity left out

    This covid winter should be better than last Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, President Biden’s chief medical adviser https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/22/us/politics/fauci-covid-winter-surge.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2022/11/22/covid-bivalent-booster/?utm_campaign=wp_to_your_health&utm_medium=email&utm_source=newsletter&wpisrc=nl_tyh Combination of infections and vaccinations, enough community protection that we’re not going to see a repeat of what we saw last year at this time Re bivalent effectiveness It is clear now, despite an initial bit of confusion United States Nearly $5 billion to buy 171 million bivalent boosters (Pfizer BioNTech, Moderna) Hobson’s choice Dr. Ashish K. Jha, White House’s Covid-19 response coordinator Still heavily promoting vaccination Nothing I have seen in the subvariants makes me believe that we can’t manage our way through it effectively, especially if people step up and get their vaccine So far, 35 million people, (11% of over 5s) one bivalent shot https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7148e1.htm?s_cid=mm7148e1_w Effectiveness of Bivalent mRNA Vaccines in Preventing Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection — Increasing Community Access to Testing Program, United States, September–November 2022 This is the clinical trial, previous work had only been based on antibodies Benefits are mentioned, adverse reactions are not Any adverse reactions not reported v-safe https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/wr/mm7144a3.htm?s_cid=mm7144a3_w Systemic symptoms Fatigue (30.0%–53.1%) Headache (19.7%–42.8%) Myalgia (20.3%–41.3%) Fever (10.2%–26.3%) Reported inability to complete normal daily activities 10.6% among aged over 65 years 19.8% among aged 18–49 years Bivalent boosters provided significant additional protection against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection Relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of a bivalent booster dose, compared with that of more than 2 monovalent vaccine doses, 30% and 56% aged 18–49 with relative benefits increasing with time since receipt of the most recent monovalent vaccine dose. Staying up to date with COVID-19 vaccination, including getting a bivalent booster dose when eligible, is critical to maximizing protection against COVID-19 350,000 tests at almost 10,000 retail pharmacies between Sept. 14 and Nov. 11 Relative risk given Absolute risk not given What about protection from severe disease? Paul Offit, director of the vaccine education center, professor of pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia The only reasonable goal is to prevent serious illness, We are still waiting for one shred of evidence that this bivalent vaccine or any bivalent is better than what we had Virus continues to evolve This should be a cautionary tale for what happens when you try to chase these variants Celine Gounder, infectious-disease specialist, Kaiser Family Foundation It doesn’t show the bivalents are better than the original boosters (but still advocated the bivalent shot) Pei-Yong Shi, virologist, University of Texas Medical Branch difficult to measure how well the updated boosters were working because so many people now had some immunity from earlier infections, including people who were never vaccinated or boosted. John P. Moore, virologist, Weill Cornell Medicine Are the boosters working better than the original shots? Personally, I doubt there would have been much, if any, difference, but we may never know Dr. Roby Bhattacharyya, infectious disease physician, Massachusetts General Hospital This winter should be better than last we’re a more immune population China https://www.reuters.com/world/china/chinas-daily-covid-cases-hit-record-high-2022-11-24/?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=daily-briefing&utm_term=11-24-2022 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/11/24/iphone-factory-staff-offered-1400-leave-i Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    CDC, natural immunity left out

About

Hello Everyone, My name is John Campbell and I am a retired Nurse Teacher and former clinical nurse based in England. I also do some teaching in Asia and Africa when time permits. These videos are to help students to learn the background to all forms of health care. My PhD focused on the development of open learning resources for nurses nationally and internationally. LinkedIn profile, https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-john-campbell-5256223b/ Twitter, https://twitter.com/Johnincarlisle Disclaimer; These media including videos, book, e book, articles, podcasts are not peer-reviewed. They should never replace individual clinical judgement from your own health care provider. No media-based material on this channel is suitable for using as professional medical advice. All comments are also for educational purposed only and must never replace advice from your own health care provider

You Might Also Like