El Podcast

El Podcast Media

In El Podcast, anything and everything is up for discussion. Grab a drink and join us in this epic virtual happy hour!

  1. E161: From Rome to Right Now: What History Gets Wrong About Collapse - Dr. Luke Kemp

    3일 전

    E161: From Rome to Right Now: What History Gets Wrong About Collapse - Dr. Luke Kemp

    Dr. Luke Kemp, an Existential Risk Researcher at the University of Cambridge shows how today’s plutocracy and tech-fueled surveillance imperil society—and what we can do to build resilience. Guest bio: Dr. Luke Kemp is an Existential Risk Researcher at the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk (CSER) at the University of Cambridge and author of Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse. His work examines how wealth concentration, surveillance, and arms races erode democracy and heighten global catastrophic risk. Topics discussed: The “Goliath” concept: dominance hierarchies vs. vague “civilization”Are we collapsing now? Signals vs. sudden shocksInequality as the engine of fragility; lootable resources & dataTech’s role: AI as accelerant, surveillance capitalism, autonomous weaponsNuclear risk, climate links, and system-level causes of catastropheDemocracy’s erosion and alternatives (sortition, deliberation)Elite overproduction, factionalism, and arms/resource/status “races”Collapse as leveler: winners, losers, and myths about mass die-offPractical pathways: leveling power, wealth taxes, open democracyMain points: “Civilization” consistently manifests as stacked dominance hierarchies—what Kemp calls the Goliath—which naturally concentrate wealth and power over time.Rising inequality spills into political, informational, and coercive power, making societies brittle and less able to correct course.Existential threats are interconnected; AI, nukes, climate, and bio risks share causes and amplify each other.AI need not be Skynet to be dangerous; it speeds arms races, surveillance, and catastrophic decision cycles.Collapse isn’t always apocalypse; often it fragments power and improves life for many outside the elite core.Durable safety requires leveling power: progressive/wealth taxation, stronger democracy (especially sortition-based, deliberative bodies), and curbing surveillance and arms races.Top 3 quotes: “Most collapse theories trace back to one driver: the steady concentration of wealth and power that makes societies top-heavy and blind.”“AI is an accelerant—pouring fuel on the fires of arms races, surveillance, and extractive economics.”“If we want a long future, we don’t just need tech fixes—we need to level power and make democracy real.” 🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.  Thanks for listening!

    1시간 17분
  2. E160: How North Korea’s Dictatorship Endures: Historian Fyodor Tertitskiy Explains

    10월 11일

    E160: How North Korea’s Dictatorship Endures: Historian Fyodor Tertitskiy Explains

    A deep dive with historian Dr. Fyodor Tertitskiy on how North Korea’s dynasty survives—through isolation, terror, and nukes—and why collapse or unification is far from inevitable. Guest bio: Fyodor Tertitskiy, PhD, is a Russian-born historian of North Korea and a senior research fellow at Kookmin University (Seoul). A naturalized South Korean based in Seoul, he is the author of Accidental Tyrant: The Life of Kim Il-sung. He speaks Russian, Korean, and English, has visited North Korea (2014, 2017), and researches using Soviet, North Korean, and Korean-language sources. Topics discussed: Daily life under extreme authoritarianism (no open internet, monitored communications, mandatory leader portraits)Kim Il-sung’s rise via Soviet backing; historical fabrications in official narratives1990s famine, loss of sponsors, rise of black markets and briberyNukes/missiles as regime-survival tools; dynasty continuity vs. unificationWhy German-style unification is unlikely (costs, politics, identity; waning support in the South)Regime control stack: isolation, propaganda “white list,” terror, collective punishmentReliability of defectors’ accounts; sensationalism vs. fabricationResearch methods: multilingual archives, leaks, captured docs, propaganda close-readingElite wealth vs. citizen poverty; renewed patronage via RussiaCoups/assassination plots, succession uncertaintyNorth Korean cyber ops and crypto theft“Authoritarian drift” debates vs. media hyperbole in democraciesLife in Seoul: safety, civility, cultureMain points: North Korea bans information by default and enforces obedience through fear.Elites have everything to lose from change; nukes deter regime-ending threats.Unification would be socially and fiscally seismic; absent a Northern revolution, it’s improbable.Markets and graft sustain daily life while strategic sectors get resources.Collapse predictions are guesses; stable yet brittle systems can still break from shocks.Defector claims need case-by-case verification; mass CIA scripting is unlikely.Archival evidence shows key “facts” were retrofitted to build the Kim myth.Democracy’s victory isn’t automatic—citizens and institutions must defend it.Top 3 quotes: “There is no internet unless the Supreme Leader permits it—and even then, someone from the secret police may sit next to you taking notes.”“They will never surrender nuclear weapons—nukes are the guarantee of the regime’s survival.”“The triumph of democracy is not automatic; there is no fate—evil can prevail.” 🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.  Thanks for listening!

    59분
  3. E159: Laziness Is a Myth: How Hustle Culture Hijacked Your Life

    10월 4일

    E159: Laziness Is a Myth: How Hustle Culture Hijacked Your Life

    Dr. Devon Price unpacks “the laziness lie,” how AI and “bullshit jobs” distort work and higher ed, and why centering human needs—not output—leads to saner lives. Guest bio: Devon Price, PhD, is a Clinical Associate Professor of Psychology at Loyola University Chicago, a social psychologist, & writer. Prof Price is the author of Laziness Does Not Exist, Unmasking Autism, and Unlearning Shame, focusing on burnout, neurodiversity, and work culture. Topics discussed: The laziness lie: origins and three core tenetsAI’s effects on output pressure, layoffs, and disposabilityOverlap with David Graeber’s B******t Jobs and status hierarchiesAdjunctification and incentives in academiaDemographic cliff and the sales-ification of universitiesCareer choices in an AI era: minimize debt and stay flexibleRemote work’s productivity spike and boundary erosionBurnout as a signal to rebuild values around care and communityGap years, social welfare, and redefining “good jobs”Practicing compassion toward marginalized people labeled “lazy”Main points: The laziness lie equates worth with productivity, distrusts needs/limits, and insists there’s always more to do, fueling self-neglect and stigma.Efficiency gains from tech and AI are converted into higher expectations rather than rest or shorter hours.Many high-status roles maintain hierarchy more than they create real value; resentment often targets meaningful, low-paid work.U.S. higher ed relies on precarious adjunct labor while admin layers swell, shifting from education to a jobs-sales funnel.In a volatile market, avoid debt, build broad human skills, and choose adaptable paths over brittle credentials.Remote work raised output but erased boundaries; creativity requires rest and unstructured time.Burnout is the body’s refusal of exploitation; recovery means reprioritizing relationships, art, community, and self-care.A humane society would channel tech gains into shorter hours and better care work and infrastructure.Revalue baristas, caregivers, teachers, and artists as vital contributors.Everyday practice: show compassion—especially to those our culture labels “lazy.”Top three quotes: “What burnout really is, is the body refusing to be exploited anymore.” — Devon Price“Efficiency never gets rewarded; it just ratchets up the expectations.” — Devon Price“What is the point of AI streamlining work if we punish humans for not being needed?” — Devon Price    🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.  Thanks for listening!

    59분
  4. E158: Post-Plagiarism University: Replacing Humans with AI—Belonging Dips, GPAs Slide, Integrity Erodes

    9월 27일

    E158: Post-Plagiarism University: Replacing Humans with AI—Belonging Dips, GPAs Slide, Integrity Erodes

    Dr. Joseph Crawford unpacks how AI is reshaping higher education - eroding student belonging, redefining assessment in a post-plagiarism era, and raising the stakes for soft skills. Guest bio Dr. Joseph “Joey” Crawford is a Senior Lecturer in Management at the University of Tasmania and ranks among the top 1% of most-cited researchers globally. His work centers on leadership, student belonging, and the role of AI in higher education, and he serves as Editor-in-Chief of a leading education journal. Topics discussed AI in higher education and the “post-plagiarism” eraStudent belonging, loneliness, and mental health impactsMassification of education (8% → 30% → 50.2% participation)Programmatic assessment vs. essays/examsCOVID-19’s lasting effects on campus culture and learningRecorded lectures, flipped learning, and in-person tradeoffsSoft skills, leadership education, and employabilityAcademic integrity, peer review, and AI misuse by facultyLabor shortages, graduate readiness, and industry pathwaysSocial anxiety, AI “friendship,” and GPA outcomesMain points & takeaways AI substitutes human support: Heavy chatbot use can provide a sense of social support but correlates with lower belonging and reduced GPA compared to human connections.Belonging matters: Human social support predicts higher well-being and better academic performance; AI support does not translate into belonging.Post-plagiarism reality: Traditional lecture-plus-essay or multiple-choice assessment is increasingly unreliable for verifying authorship.Assessment is shifting: Universities are exploring programmatic assessment—fewer, higher-stakes integrity checks across a degree instead of every course.Massification pressures quality: Participation in Australia rose from 8% (1989) to 30% (2020) to 50.2% (2021), straining rigor and prompting curriculum simplification and grade inflation.COVID + ChatGPT = double shock: Online habits and interaction anxiety from the pandemic compounded with AI convenience, reducing peer-to-peer engagement.Less face time: Many business courses dropped live lectures; students are now ~2 hours less in-class per subject, raising the bar for workshops to build soft skills.Workforce mismatch: Employers want communication and leadership; graduates often lack mastery because entry-level “practice” tasks are automated.Faculty risks too: Using AI to draft peer reviews can embed weak scholarship into training corpora and distort future models.Pragmatic advice: Don’t fear AI—use it—but replace lost micro-interactions with real people and deliberately practice human skills (e.g., leadership, psychology).Top quotes  “We’re in a post-plagiarism world where knowing who wrote what is a real challenge.”“Some students are replacing librarians, peers, and support staff with bots—they’re fast, infinitely friendly, and never judge.”“AI social support doesn’t create belonging—and that shows up in grades.”“The lecture isn’t gone, but in many programs it’s recorded—and students now get less in-person time.”“Don’t substitute AI-created efficiency with more work—substitute it with more people.” 🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.  Thanks for listening!

    1시간 20분
  5. E157: Have We Got Happiness Wrong? Eric Weiner on Bliss in Age of AI

    9월 24일

    E157: Have We Got Happiness Wrong? Eric Weiner on Bliss in Age of AI

    Author Eric Weiner argues that happiness depends less on wealth or location than on relationships, meaning, trust, and realistic expectations—while tech and social media often push the other way. Guest bio: Eric Weiner is a bestselling author and former NPR foreign correspondent whose books include The Geography of Bliss, The Geography of Genius, The Socrates Express, and Ben and Me. He writes about place, meaning, creativity, and how to live well. Topics discussed: The “where” of happiness vs. the “what/who”Nordic stability in the World Happiness ReportMoldova as a control case for unhappinessRelationships as the core driver of well-beingSocial media, AI, and the erosion of meaning/trustMoney, inequality, and the Easterlin paradoxU-shaped curve and Gen Z’s flatteningTravel as transformation (place as permission)Gross National Happiness (Bhutan) vs. GDPExpectations as the enemy of happinessMain points: Relationships matter most: “other people” are the two-word secret.Money helps only to a modest threshold; then diminishing returns.Inequality alone doesn’t predict happiness; trust does.Tech/social media amplify envy and faux-connection, sapping meaning.AI optimizes “good enough,” not creative leaps; it can erode trust.Gen Z shows worrying dips in meaning/connection post-2015 + pandemic.Travel reframes perspective; you can’t outrun yourself.Focus on process over outcomes; detach effort from results.Top quotes: “If I had to sum up the secret to happiness in two words: other people.”“Expectations are the enemy of happiness—invest 100% in effort, 0% in results.”“AI is dangerously seductive because it’s good enough—but creative leaps don’t come from averages.”“Social media are envy-generating machines.”“Trust is the hidden variable of happy societies.”“Technology promises time, but unstructured time doesn’t make us happier—meaning does.”Data points mentioned:  U-shaped happiness across life; Gen Z may be an exception (smartphone ubiquity + pandemic).U.S. trust reversal: ~1960s ≈ two-thirds said “most people can be trusted”; recent polls ≈ two-thirds say the opposite.Easterlin paradox: happiness rises with income only up to a point.Gen Z snapshots (Harvard/Baylor cited in convo): ~58% lack meaning; ~56% financial concern; ~45% “things falling apart”; ~34% lonely. 🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.  Thanks for listening!

    54분
  6. E156: Former CIA Analyst Exposes the Weaponization of Loneliness

    9월 10일

    E156: Former CIA Analyst Exposes the Weaponization of Loneliness

    A conversation with Stella Morabito on how the weaponization of loneliness—from Soviet propaganda to modern social media—threatens free speech, family, and community. 👤 Guest BioStella Morabito – Writer and former CIA intelligence analyst specializing in Soviet propaganda and media during the 1980s. She is the author of The Weaponization of Loneliness: How Tyrants Stoke Our Fear of Isolation to Silence, Divide, and Conquer (2022) and a senior contributor at The Federalist. 📌 Topics DiscussedMorabito’s CIA background analyzing Soviet propagandaThe concept of the “machinery of loneliness” and how tyrants exploit fear of isolationThe pandemic as a “dress rehearsal” for social control and social credit systemsEducation, political correctness, and social media as tools of conformityYuri Bezmenov’s four stages of ideological subversionThe role of “almost psychopaths” in totalitarian movementsAttacks on family, motherhood, and masculinity as destabilizing forcesGen Z’s shifting attitudes toward faith, family, and communityBuilding mediating institutions (family, faith, friendship) to resist centralization💡 Main PointsFear of isolation is a powerful tool used by tyrants throughout history, from the French Revolution to Mao’s Cultural Revolution.The pandemic revealed how easily fear could be weaponized to enforce conformity, resembling China’s social credit system.Education and media are central targets because they credential all other institutions and shape entire generations.Social media extends peer pressure 24/7, worsening youth mental health and magnifying political correctness.“Almost psychopaths” rationalize cruelty under pseudo-religions or ideologies and become enforcers of totalitarian conformity.Mediating institutions—family, faith, and community—are the strongest antidote to centralized control.Gen Z shows promise in resisting mainstream narratives and seeking meaning through faith and family, partly due to disillusionment from the pandemic.🗣️ Top 3 Quotes“The fear of isolation is hardwired into us… and it makes us not only miserable creatures, but easily manipulated.”“Free speech is a use-it-or-lose-it proposition. Once we stop speaking freely, we lose it.”“The ultimate goal of totalitarians is not money—it’s to control the mediating institutions of family, faith, and friendship.” 🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.  Thanks for listening!

    40분
  7. E155: Special Ops Tactics for Breakthrough Creativity - Dr. Angus Fletcher Explains

    9월 3일

    E155: Special Ops Tactics for Breakthrough Creativity - Dr. Angus Fletcher Explains

    Neuroscientist explains why school crushes creativity—and how to fix it—teaching “primal intelligence” and special-operations tactics you can use at work, at home, and in the classroom to think and innovate better. Guest Bio: Dr. Angus Fletcher is a neuroscientist and professor of Story Science at The Ohio State University. He studies how intuition, imagination, emotion, and common sense work in the brain and advises U.S. Special Operations, Fortune 50 firms, and schools on creativity and resilience. His new book is Primal Intelligence: You Are Smarter Than You Know. Topics Discussed: Creativity decline starting ~3rd grade; standardized testing & sit-still schoolingData vs. volatile reality; limits of AI/logic vs. human neural toolsSpecial Operations creativity pipeline; training vs. selection“Why”-free inquiry (who/what/when/where/how) to deepen relationships & learningUnlearning dependency on external answers; experiential learningPersonal story as plan/plot; fear, anxiety, and outsourcing your storyJobs, Shakespeare, and intensifying uniqueness; innovation beyond “grind” and “hack”“Eat your enemy”: learning asymmetrically from competitorsMedication, signals, and growth; tuning anxiety as a sensorMyths like left-brain/right-brain; labels vs. open-ended growthMain Points: Schooling often conditions “there’s a right answer and the teacher has it,” which suppresses creativity and initiative.Data predicts yesterday; real life is volatile. Human neurons support non-computational tools—intuition, imagination, common sense—vital for innovation.Creativity can be trained: Special Ops methods and experiential learning reliably build it.Skip “why” in discovery conversations to avoid premature judgments; stay curious with who/what/when/where/how.Reclaim your personal story; fear pushes people to borrow others’ plans, which erodes meaning.Innovation strategy: identify exceptions and intensify them (Jobs), and “eat your enemy” by absorbing rivals’ unique strengths.Emotions are signals; meds can be triage, but durable growth comes from engaging hard experiences.Left/right-brain personality labels are misleading; biological growth thrives on branching diversity.Top Quotes:  “School trains kids to solve math problems, not life problems.”“Skip the ‘why’—the moment you jump to why, you stop learning.”“Your story is your plan. Fear makes you outsource it.”“Anxiety is a calibrated sensor, not a flaw.” 🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.  Thanks for listening!

    1시간
  8. E154: Don’t Buy That House: The HOA Nightmare Exposed - Shelly Marshall

    8월 30일

    E154: Don’t Buy That House: The HOA Nightmare Exposed - Shelly Marshall

    Homeowner-advocate Shelly Marshall explains why many HOAs function like private governments—often stripping owners’ rights—and how to protect yourself (or avoid them entirely). Guest bioShelly Marshall is a homeowner advocate and author of HOA Warrior. After battling abusive HOA boards in her own community, she’s spent 15+ years researching HOA law, advising homeowners, and pushing for reforms nationwide. She can be reached at info@hoawarrior.com and hoawarrior.com. She can be reached at info@hoawarrior.com and hoawarrior.com. Topics discussedHow Shelly became an HOA advocate after a hostile board takeoverBoards changing rules without homeowner votes; covenant enforcement gapsLiens, fines, special assessments, and foreclosure riskWhy management companies and industry trade groups (e.g., CAI) shape incentivesLegal exposure: joint liability, collateralization, and lack of transparencyHorror stories: lawns, hoses, swing sets, condemned structures, and jail timeBuying vs. renting; LLCs for limited protection; why “one election away from disaster”What due diligence (doesn’t) solve; legislative reform efforts and limitsPractical survival tips if you’re already in an HOAMain points / takeawaysBuying into an HOA is entering a business partnership with neighbors; your property can be leveraged, and you share liabilities.Boards often wield broad power, sometimes changing or selectively enforcing rules with limited transparency.Fines, fees, and special assessments can exceed mortgages and trigger foreclosures—even for minor “violations.”Industry actors (management companies, banks, attorneys) have financial incentives that can work against homeowners.Litigation is costly and asymmetric; few attorneys take homeowner cases.If you must buy, an LLC (cash purchase) offers better protection; otherwise, renting avoids systemic risks.If you’re already in an HOA: pay first, appeal later; avoid being labeled a “troublemaker”; document everything.Legislative fixes help only marginally; structural incentives remain misaligned.Top quotes“You don’t buy a home in an HOA—you buy into a business with all your neighbors.”“They can change the rules after you’ve moved in, often without your vote.”“One election away from disaster—every single time.”“Your house can become collateral for loans you didn’t know existed.”“Pay the fine first, fight later—escalation is how homeowners lose homes.”“My advice? Don’t buy into an HOA. If you must live there, rent.” 🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.  Thanks for listening!

    59분
5
최고 5점
9개의 평가

소개

In El Podcast, anything and everything is up for discussion. Grab a drink and join us in this epic virtual happy hour!

좋아할 만한 다른 항목