Constitutional Chats Presented By Constituting America

Cathy Gillespie
  • 4.7 (20)
  • EDUCATION
  • UPDATED WEEKLY

Cathy Gillespie, and Constituting America’s Student Ambassadors – Tova Love Kaplan, Jule Gilbert and Jorne Gilbert – chat with Constitutional experts on hot-topic issues via Zoom!

  1. 4H AGO · VIDEO

    Ep. 271 | Constitutional Chats Podcast | Susan McWilliams | What Holds Our Republic Together? A Wrap-Up on Checks & Balances

    Today we wrap up our discussion on checks and balances with special guest Dr. Susan McWilliams.  In this concluding episode, Dr. McWilliams takes us back to our founding and explains why the founders created a system of separation of powers and checks and balances, dividing power between the branches, with mechanisms for the branches to check each other. The Founders recognized the need and virtue in ambition but also its potential path to tyranny, so they prioritized protecting natural rights in order to keep us free.  Join us as Dr. Susan McWilliams walks us through this enlightening discussion! Dr. McWilliams is the 2025-2026 William F. Podlich Distinguished Fellow in Government at Claremont McKenna College and she has been on the faculty of Pomona College since 2006.

    56 min

  2. SEP 12 · VIDEO

    Ep. 270 | Constitutional Chats Podcast | Thomas Jipping | Landmark Supreme Court Rulings: The Cases That Changed U.S. History

    What makes a Supreme Court case a landmark case?  That’s going to mean something different to each of us.  Generally those cases that plow new ground can be viewed as landmark.  The Supreme Court rules on a wide range of cases that affect the way our government functions.  To discuss a number of these cases, our special guest today is Thomas Jipping, Senior Legal Fellow, Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation.

    55 min

  3. AUG 29 · VIDEO

    Ep. 269 | Constitutional Chats Podcast | Josh Dunn | Judicial Review: What It Is and Why Marbury v. Madison Matters

    Marbury v. Madison is a landmark Supreme Court case that we all learned in U.S. History class established the principle of judicial review. Our guest today, Dr. Josh Dunn, takes a slightly different view. Join us as we continue our series on the Constitution’s checks and balances and dive deeper into Marbury v. Madison and the concept of judicial review. Dr. Dunn is Professor and Executive Director of the Institute of American Civics at the Baker School of Public Affairs and Public Policy at the University of Tennessee.

    56 min

  4. AUG 22 · VIDEO

    Ep. 268 | Constitutional Chats Podcast | Mackubin T. Owens | The Founders’ Blueprint: Checks, Balances, and Civilian Control of the Military

    The United States military, while not the largest by number of enlisted members, is unmatched with its number of ships, planes and tanks.  The Founders divided control of the military in quite a genius way.  Some power rests with Congress and some rests with the President as the military’s commander-in-chief.  Why did the Founders want military power to rest with civilians?  How does this protect natural rights?   To discuss the checks and balances in control of the extraordinary power of our military, we are delighted to welcome Mackubin (Mac) T. Owens to our podcast this week. Dr. Owens is a retired Marine Corps Colonel and Silver Star recipient for service during the Vietnam War, past dean of academic affairs at the Institute of World Politics and senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute.

    57 min

  5. AUG 15 · VIDEO

    Ep. 267 | Constitutional Chats Podcast | Gary Porter | What’s a Convention of States? (And Can It Really Happen?)

    Any amendment to the U.S. Constitution has two paths to be proposed to the states for ratification. One is the well-known path: a 2/3 vote in both houses of Congress. Article V of the Constitution also dictates how potential amendments can be proposed to the states for ratification by a Convention of States.  Could a Convention of States actually happen? This week’s guest says it can and will! To walk us through this process, we are pleased to welcome Gary Porter, Executive Director of the Constitution Leadership Initiative.  Gary recently led the Virginia Delegation in a 2023 Convention of States Simulation held in Williamsburg.

    56 min

  6. AUG 8 · VIDEO

    Ep. 266 | Constitutional Chats Podcast | Alex E. Hindman | The Veto and the Constitution

    Here’s an interesting point to ponder: we think of the veto power as a presidential power but the power is found in Article I, Section VII, which we know creates Congress.  This means the Founders intended the veto process to be every bit a part of the legislative process as well as an executive power.  Why did they do this?  What “grievance” found in the Declaration of Independence was the veto and veto override intended to rectify?  What is the mechanism and process through which a veto takes place and how can a bill become law even if vetoed by the President?  Our special guest today to discuss this powerful tool is Alex E. HIndman, Assistant Professor of Political Science at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts.

    55 min

  7. AUG 1 · VIDEO

    Ep. 265 | Constitutional Chats Podcast | William Reddinger | Demystifying the Constitutional Amendment Process and Its Checks and Balances

    The United States has the oldest written constitution still in use than any other country.  This stability is due in part to mechanisms buil in that protect our freedom. One such mechanism is the amendment process.  What are the two paths for an amendment to come to pass and why did the Founding Fathers include this process when drafting the Constitution?  To answer these questions, we are pleased to welcome William Reddinger.  Dr. Reddinger is an associate professor at Regent University and Director of the Lincoln Program in America’s Founding Principles.

    56 min

  8. JUL 25 · VIDEO

    Ep. 264 | Constitutional Chats Podcast | Jon Schaff | The Power of the Purse: Congress's Constitutional Power to Control Government Spending

    In Federalist 30, published in 1787, Alexander Hamilton explains the separation of powers as the executive branch having the power of the sword and the legislative branch having the power of the purse.  A functioning government needs to be able to enforce law and wage but also has to be able to raise and spend appropriate money.  This creates an incredibly effective check on both of those branches as one cannot function without the other.  To dive further into this special governmental check we are pleased to welcome back last week’s guest Dr. Jon Schaff, Professor of Government/Director of the Center for Public History and Civic Engagement at Northern University in South Dakota.

    58 min
See All (99)

Ratings & Reviews

4.7
out of 5
20 Ratings

About

Cathy Gillespie, and Constituting America’s Student Ambassadors – Tova Love Kaplan, Jule Gilbert and Jorne Gilbert – chat with Constitutional experts on hot-topic issues via Zoom!

Information

You Might Also Like