GFILE Radio

GFILE NEWS
  • 5.0 (1)
  • News

In this podcast we discuss Civil Rights, hosted by attorney Trenton Garmon.

  1. 02/26/2021

    20210226 – SB-46 Bill passed in Alabama Senate with guest Marty Schelper | GFILE Radio, Feb. 26, 2021

    In this episode, Trenton Garmon, ESQ., interviews with Marty Schleper about the SB-46 bill being passed in Alabama Senate and medical marijuana consideration in Alabama. Transcript - [Notice & Disclosure: TRANSCRIPT Not word-for-word AI Transcribed, but rather an unedited and unrevised Text version provided for key term searches and general outline, audio should be consulted for exact contexts.] Trenton Garmon 0:19 Welcome one Welcome all to I Heart Radio. This is Trenton Garmon live, bringing to you a two part show today we've got Marty Schelper from the Alabama republicans against medical marijuana prohibition or just marijuana prohibition, she's going to be discussing the recent change that we have seen in some of the lawmakers perspectives in regard to natural medicine and where that's going, Marty, thank you for being with us here on the show. Tell us congratulations on your big win. Tell us what's going on in the world of Alabama's consideration of medical marijuana. Marty Schelper 0:58 Well, thank you, Trenton. And it's a big win for the citizens of Alabama, I don't want to you know, overshadow that by any stretch of the imagination. And we are excited, you know, the SB-46, passed the Alabama Senate. It's moving on to the house HELP Committee and the House Judiciary Committee. And it'll pass those two committees and move on to a debate on the floor of the Alabama house. Trenton Garmon 1:25 That's great to hear. So as I understand it, which is just part of the process. And I always like to sort through some of the most difficult elements First, the power hurdles, but there's been an additional committee that's required of this bill, is that true and accurate? Marty Schelper 1:40 It is because of the legalization of cannabis for this Senate. And because it is considered a medical bill, it has to go through the Judiciary Committee and it has to go through the house Health Committee. That's why there's two committees that have been assigned to this. And we do not know at this time, which one it's going to go through first. Trenton Garmon 2:04 Okay. And back in December of 2019 believe there was a report of medical cannabis that was issued by study commission 18 total, members of the Commission looks like seven medical doctors, two PhDs, three lawyers, two pharmacists, two psychiatrists turn to neurologists and a radiology oncologist. So we're seeing I think, progresses to natural medicine for the state, which is only one of five in the entire United States that has total prohibition against medical marijuana. And so thank you for what you're doing for the people that do suffer from the conditions that are covered. What are some of the conditions that that you think this bill will help because obviously, their citizens out there and others opposition that is going to be, you know, something that's going to have to be overcome in the Senate, I believe, or the house, believe the speaker is saying that he's going to do everything he can to delay the passing of it, which is extremely discouraging when you consider there's probably some child at some point in time that's going to have epileptic seizure. And you know, this church of god man is rooted in his radical Protestantism. So it seems for the moment, but what are some of the conditions that the bill and the commission that was appointed to study it have a viable way to to be beneficial? And what are your thoughts as to that report? Marty Schelper 3:23 Okay, I do want to mention since you asked about the different conditions, there was one amendment from Senator Bobby Singleton that was added to the list, it was amended, and to include sickle cell anemia. So we were really happy about that. But you mentioned epileptic seizures, autism, cancer patients, people who have chronic pain. The list goes on and on. The legislation is out there. If people will go to our Facebook page, Alabama republicans against marijuana prohibition. We're posting tons of information out there with links so that people can read the legislation. We're posting information so people can contact their legislators, because we're at a very, very critical time right now with this House Judiciary Committee, and the house Health Committee. We need citizens of the state of Alabama to call and email the members of those two House committees and let them know personally how important that this cannabis legislation is to them. And I want to remind people, cannabis has an ancient history. This is not something that we just discovered, you know, miraculously discovered that cannabis is beneficial to the endocannabinoid system that every human being has to keep their bodies in a state of homeostasis. This plant is put here by God, to heal the nation's and for us to be able to heal our bodies. And I want people to know, these legislators either need to be educated, or you just need to let them know that this is important. To you, and if it's not important to them, you should have the right to choose. Trenton Garmon 5:04 Well, it goes back to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness against these four these rights was the reason that government is there that they exist to secure the citizens rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness endowed by our Creator. So I think you're spot on Marty, and we look and see science is confirming it. There's obviously always changes in perspective, you know, with culture, but yeah, no, no, would you say the list goes on. I mean, there's right now very clear itemized list of what conditions it would be designed to treat, of course, the method and manner in which it would be distributed and believe the seed to sale part of the bill is very beneficial for even local farmers and business people because it's gonna require there be a stringent process and all of the cannabis that is eventually becomes medicine and process would have been grown in the state of Alabama. And of course, would be employing by way of being, you know, prove people to work for those farmers and people to work for them, the dispensers themselves. So with regard to the opposition, go ahead. Marty Schelper 6:10 I just wanted to say and and that was something that was very important to Senator Tim Melton, from Florence that sponsored sb 46. That could go to Nelson. Trenton Garmon 6:19 Yeah, he's been there need to really cheer him on, because he stood in the gap and just continued to speak. He's a medical doctor, of course. But speaking half of those that understand the medical benefits and what 45 out of 50 other states understand, it's odd that we have the House Speaker saying that they're going to take their time, which to me, that is really a sandbagging approach to medicine. That's very unfortunate. But go ahead. You were saying? Marty Schelper 6:48 Yeah, the reason I wanted to mention him is because he did stand up for the citizens of Bama, not just the sick, suffering and dying who need access to this. But he stood up for the farmers in the state of Alabama, and people forget how many jobs are going to be brought on online. When this program is implemented? It's not just going to be the farmers. I mean, there's going to be this is going to be like a cottage industry that's created. And it's going to provide funding into the state of Alabama, just for the lot, they do not know. I mean, I really do think that I know what the blowback is, but I mean, you know, 3637 other sites in the nation have access to medicinal therapeutic cannabis. It's time for Alabama to lead. The state of Oklahoma is working on legislation right now that anyone from any other site can come to Oklahoma, go to a doctor, get a medical card, and have access to their medicinal cannabis program and the shadow Oklahoma. Sure, Oklahoma is leading. Now those people can't transport that product legally back to the states where they actually live. Well, Trenton Garmon 8:04 that's probably not deeply rooted, no constitutional truth. But there were three public hearings held on the cannabis proposal as part of the study. And of course, it examined federal laws, regulations of other states made a recommendation to the legislature and as you brought up earlier, there was an overwhelming approval, we had 12 out of the 18. On the panel, three abstained to give a recommendation or vote in favor, but of that group that we discussed there just briefly earlier, there's overwhelming support. So I do hope that the house, pushes the ball in the endzone and allows for those Alabamians who are going to go to their doctor and follow their doctor's advice, to not have a bureaucratic sandbag and barrier to that very basic human right. And I believe if my child's laying on the floor having an epileptic seizure, and I knew that one droplet of hemp or cannabis or some type of medicine The doctor has approved would alleviate that. God forbid some bureaucratic lawmakers stand in the middle and in the way of that so Marty, you're are in my prayers. You are one of my heroes out on the forefront doing the work because I know it's not easy. herding cats is that kind of what it seems like when you're trying to get this bill back through and well for approval and considered. Marty Schelper 9:28 I do own a business which affords me time and I spend 12 to 14 hours a day on average on cannabis advocacy. And I feel like that I'm juggling bottles and herding cats. The most important thing that I can cite today, if you are within the sound of my voice, and you are on social media, con Conde tak the house, this the Alabama House members and let them know that this is important to you. Even if it's not Something that you think that you would use, but you think that it's someone in your family may need or a friend, someone at your church, please contact the members of the Alabama house and let them know that you're in support of this because if you're talking about it on social media, they're not seeing i

    25 min

  2. 02/24/2021

    COVID-19 Therapeutics & Other Solutions with Dr. Francis Koe | GFILE Radio, Feb. 19, 2021

    In this episode, Trenton Garmon interviews Dr. Francis Koe about the COVID-19 Vaccine. Transcript Trenton Garmon 0:17 Welcome one Welcome all to I Heart Radio. This is attorney Trenton, Garmin. We've got a two part show for you today talking about the COVID vaccine with Dr. Francis Co. She's a medical doctor in Alabama, who I guess has a general practice from maybe a natural medicine perspective as much as anything while embracing the pharmaceutical side of things. And she's going to share with us her perspective on vaccine pushes and the safety tests that we've got. And, of course, we're gonna be talking through civil rights news and legal docket reports as well. Dr. Koe, welcome to the show. Thank you for spending time with us and joining us today. Thank you. And so as I understand that you have a general practice in Alabama, and I guess vaccines are something that any general practitioner has administered within their offices, you know, tell us what your practice is composed of the areas of medicine that you practice, primarily. And then we'll get into some of the known and the unknowns about COVID. And the vaccines that are being pushed today. Dr. Francis Koe 1:22 So I have a family medicine practice. I did my residency, medical school and residency in Alabama. And so I practice in northeast Alabama, in a very small town of about 900 people. So I'm the only physician in the area in my town. And I have some nurse practitioners working with me and we see newborns all the way to death. I do home visits, nursing home care, clinic care. And then we also have what we call a direct primary care clinic means yes, people just pay $50 a month and they don't have to use their insurance or if they don't have insurance, they can get some family care at $50 a month. Is there a name for that program you have there with your practice? Well, the name of my clinic is the so I have wills Valley family medicine, which is my regular insurance clinic that we have had for 13 years at since residency. And then we have Valley care DPC. And we're in the same complex, you know, we have a just a little small office there. And so both clinics are basically in the same office. Well, you're perfect for this part of the show. Because I believe that having someone look at it from a general practitioner perspective is Uber important because you're taking into consideration all the different types of ailments and issues that people have and come to you with a plan a generalized knowledge. And then of course, specialty knowledge as well. Do you vaccinate in your practice? We used to, and for Medicaid for Medicaid children. That it was it was hard to do, because we didn't see enough to keep enough vaccine in the clinic. And so we just decided to stop several years ago, we do have some vaccines like t tap tetanus, and so we give those and tetanus shots. And we do do flu vaccines. So and we do write scripts for people who want to do pneumonia vaccines, but we also write scripts for people who want to do shingles vaccine. Trenton Garmon 3:37 Well, we're in a crucial time, of course, in national medicine, and a lot of people want to know and I think there are some unknowns that we just have to be at peace about there's always going to be mysteries each year, there seems to be different strands that come out that evade the effectiveness if vaccines are truly overall safe and effective. So for those minds, those people that are not doctors and are curious, what what is your opinion with the new variant that's out and the two main vaccines that have been pushed in America right now? Do you think that it is safe and effective? Do you think that there are alternative methods that can be equally effective? Because I've seen where a lot of the medical community that then towards natural medicine are pushing a for vitamin solution, vitamin D, vitamin C and some some others? What are your thoughts with the two that we have out now? And what would you recommend the caller the the general audience as far as their personal choice and maybe meet with their physician and making an actual informed decision? Dr. Francis Koe 4:38 Yes, and I want to reiterate that you are talking about COVID vaccines, correct. So So there's two vaccines, Pfizer, biome, biotech and mount Madonna. So and they're both want. The Pfizer vaccine is purported to be 95% effective and the Madonna is 94% 10 effective. So we're very, very close. Trenton Garmon 5:01 What does that mean from a medical doctor top perspective compared to a consumer because as a product liability attorney, we do civil rights and products work. And we sued several manufacturers product device manufacturers and found that in other studies oftentimes are misleading. What is 94% effective mean? Does it mean that they detect antibodies and 94% of the people? Does it mean that you have a 94% chance of not having COVID at a subsequent time once you're vaccinated? or What does that truly mean? Dr. Francis Koe 5:33 So it's not real clear in the literature that, you know, they give us exactly what that does mean. So. So basically, when you get a vaccine, it does not mean you will not get the disease. It reduces your risk significantly. And Trenton Garmon 5:55 because your body if you're exposed to it has the amount of antibodies that would then fight off a true infection, or what is the Dr. Francis Koe 6:04 Yeah. That's what they're looking at. And it takes anywhere from 14 days to three weeks or longer, and you're in one of the vaccines, you get two shots, two injections, and the other you get both of them, you actually get two injections, one is three weeks apart, and one is four weeks apart. You do not have immunity. When you first get the injection, it takes at least three weeks to show some immunity. I'm not sure if that's exact in both in both vaccines. Trenton Garmon 6:36 And I know that's a recent concern. There was a report by NBC that a nurse had tested positive for COVID-19 despite a recent vaccination, which I think those who were pro Vax and pro big pharma were kind of shocked by says, Dr. Francis Koe 6:49 Well, she, she got that she was tested positive for that COVID in less than seven days. Trenton Garmon 6:54 So she needs the vaccine. Are you thinking she could have had it in advance? Dr. Francis Koe 7:00 She could have had it in advance. Trenton Garmon 7:01 Okay, Dr. Francis Koe 7:02 so they've not had anybody who got COVID from the vaccine Trenton Garmon 7:07 which is odd, because they put out that the first dose we think gives you somewhere in this was the to dose version, which I guess is that Madeira's version? Dr. Francis Koe 7:17 They're both two dose. Trenton Garmon 7:18 Okay, so the first dose puts you around 50% in the second dose will get you at about 95%. This is an article about Dr. Francis Koe 7:24 Yeah. Trenton Garmon 7:25 See, so what you're bringing up is, the safe and effective numbers were given are presuming a time period, I guess. So. a month long time period or something about that time period? Time Line wise. Dr. Francis Koe 7:39 Yes. And and that may not be an every person. So everybody's gonna be an individual. And, you know, so the problem is we had to put these vaccines out quickly, you know, they brought them out quickly, they don't even aren't even sure how long the vaccines are last. They may last 90 days, they may last six months, they may last a year. And then they may not last, you know, we don't even know Trenton Garmon 8:02 so 94% effective right at not contracting COVID because your body builds up immunity from that. But we don't know if that immunity last 90 days or last year. And we know that there's other strands that come out, I guess I'm just begging the question, because I'm not an anti vaxxer. But I certainly from seeing products liability work. And having the litigation door closed because of how operation warp speed work. I have got serious concerns about each one of these vaccines that have been rolled out. So what you're bringing up is, is not just hey, here's a firm number 94% effective, but you're saying you have to take into consideration each individual patient time period for the vaccines or two dose exposure or two dose administration of the vaccine. And then what else would someone take into consideration when they're making that decision? Are there two or three for a spot on conditions that you say hey, if your grandfather has this or your mother has this, she probably would more likely than not want to take the vaccine or what what's your general advice with regards to specific conditions? Dr. Francis Koe 9:08 So I basically, anybody with CO morbid conditions, things like diabetes, hypertension, and some of those conditions that make you a greater higher risk. They would more than likely benefit from the vaccine more so possibly than somebody that has no comorbid conditions. Trenton Garmon 9:28 Just curious, what percent of the population would you put that at comorbid conditions, these people are more likely to not benefit from the vaccine is that 20% of the general population or? Dr. Francis Koe 9:38 I'm not saying they wouldn't benefit from the vaccine. I'm saying those who have those comorbid conditions would need the vaccine more than somebody who didn't have those Trenton Garmon 9:49 make sense Sure, Dr. Francis Koe 9:50 would need it more quickly. And that's why they have you know, the list of folks who are getting at first but based on their age, you know people at different ages. and so forth. So, you know, it becomes really complicated. But when they do when they say it, so this is my my take on it instead of, I mean, we can look these things up, we can get all this information from the CDC website, anybody can go and look and find out how they work, what's in each vaccine. They don't contain egg preservatives, or latex. We can

    25 min

  3. 01/25/2021

    Civil Rights – Systematic Voter Fraud – Presidential Election 2020 – The Machines and the Methods.

    [Notice & Disclosure: Not word-for-word AI Transcribed, but rather an unedited and unrevised Text version provided for key term searches and general outline, audio should be consulted for exact contexts.] Week 8, Part 1 Civil Rights - Systematic Voter Fraud - Presidential Election 2020 - The Machines and the Methods.  Studio Guest - John Mountz, iHeart Special Co-Host Week 8, Part 2 Legal Docket Report - Mass Incarceration is Modern Slavery - DOJ rightly sues Alabama over prison conditions.  Studio Guest - John Mountz Call to Action - Call 855-998-7368 Sources: https://www.npr.org/2020/12/10/944879818/justice-dept-sues-alabama-over-prison-conditions Transcript Trenton Garmon 0:00 If your loved one has been the victim of police brutality, contact our firm Garmin and Associates 855 99 Trent, you or your loved one may be entitled to compensation to a federal civil rights case. So again, if you are loved them have been injured as a result of police brutality, contact us Garmin and Associates 855 99 Trent legal services to be performed case where the court of legal services before my call today. Welcome, welcome. Welcome to Trenton, Garmin live. This is a segment that I think is going to bless we the people here on iheart radio we're calling freedom of assembly. I title of course, is just drawn from principles that our nation was founded upon, which we believe are being significantly trampled on at this point in time. So it's important talk about what our founding documents say, what are we entitled to as people have a republic. And to do that I've got on the show this beautiful, beautiful day, John Mountz who's become a friend of mine, and is a very gifted and verse man. JOHN, welcome, welcome. Welcome to the show. John Mountz 1:34 Thanks, friend. Thanks for having me. Trenton Garmon 1:35 Let's just launch right in, I want to read the first amendment. And we can talk about some of the new releases that have been put out by the administration and NPR and The Washington Post, and CNN reports about something that is significant, that I don't think we're hearing a lot of chatter about the fact that for a presidential inauguration, the number one place intended by our great Republic, for the freedom of assembly being the National Mall was closed. That to me, is just absolutely mind boggling that we the people are not allowed to peacefully assemble. And it's just presumed because of the great show to not the cause for concern. But our First Amendment very clearly lays out, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of the press or speech and the right of the people to peacefully assemble, and to petition the government for redress. So Gentlemen, I bring that up, just as a topic from the beautiful, beautiful founding documents that we have as arguably the most prosperous nation. I mean, there's some things we could talk through that may have other economists be honored to say, yeah, these other countries may be less prosperous or more so but we're clearly a great nation. And we have a greatest military, which was used that the direction of obviously gets the Trump administration and then the Biden ministration. So we hope, you know, I don't know if Trump agreed to have a national law clothes or not. But, john, what are your thoughts after hearing that first amendment language, read the right people to peacefully assemble is something that Congress shall make no law. And there should be no branch of government that impairs that right of way that people? What do you think about that when cnn puts out the national malls close through the inauguration? This was put out, way back January the 15th. Not too far back with about a week plus ago. So what are your thoughts with that? And and as a member of way, the people, does that cause you concern? John Mountz 4:09 Well, Trenton it definitely does. But I look at it a little differently, because I don't see it as a constitutional issue per se, because the first words in there a Congress shall make no law. So it wasn't a congressional thing. My understanding was it was the Capitol Police that closed the mall. And it's not unusual for the Capitol Police to close the mall for any number of things. But it is a very disappointing time in our country's history that we can't gather to see the inauguration. Should you want to go see the inauguration of the President also in there in the First Amendment keeping with the spirit. There's the part about not abridging the people's ability to peaceably, you know, assembled for aggressive grievances. So, the people weren't able to protest. And if you look back look at what happened say just four years prior at Donald Trump's inauguration, people protested. People have been protesting the inauguration of the president Every time there's been an inauguration, so I have a real problem with them coming out and saying that the Capitol Police saying we're not going to allow this. And it was based on suspicion of what because I don't nothing materialized, and I don't think anything was going to Trenton Garmon 5:14 materialize. So you think it's not a good site execution by the executive branch of what's the intent of the Constitution? And so you'd say you think there's an impairment of the way the people's right so simple there, is that right? John Mountz 5:27 Absolutely. I think that and the thing is, I spent a long time I lived for about five years in Washington, DC, I spent a lot of time there, you know, running around playing on the Mall. And I've been since as an adult, and more and more they made it to where you can't hardly go on the mall for anything. They put up chains and stuff, and they don't hardly let you on the mall at all. And you know, if you think about it, it's our dollars, our tax dollars paying for all of that, at very least the upkeep. But really the whole of Washington DC, you think we could go if the Smithsonian is open for free, and for people to walk around for free? Let us walk around the mall, you know, if they sworn in, keep the president safe. And let us come to the mall and see if we should so desire to do it like every other administration. Trenton Garmon 6:11 So we've had a major transfer of power here, obviously the office of the president, he is the commander in chief commands of the greatest military on the face of the planet. And we've had at each one of the state capitals indisputable, and we're violating the principle of the First Amendment, the freedom of assembly to peacefully assemble. We've had every state capitol for the day of the inauguration, have shut down the public grounds. And of course, here the National Mall zoo, the conversation topic today. And order, which is considered to be an executive order by the DC police understand it's the District of Columbia police department, but they're still part of the executive branch. We I guess we're coming to the conclusion that both you and I will leave collectively here is to have we the people that there was a bad sight infringement by the Washington DC police department and shut down those grounds in it, in my mind shows you that obviously, the higher echelon executives within the executive branch, if you will, they did disagree. You know, you didn't see anything come out that the senator took that perspective and has said are pure right to freely assemble has been impaired. I didn't see not one article. I'm sure there are people that made this spoke out against it. So that to me is a major concern. And I do think that the shift in how the presidency came as far as certification Abaddon, to the point of being considered legitimate is still a concern for way to people. I don't anticipate any kind of subsequent actions being filed. But john, do you know of any of the cases that Trump's legal team filed that had any actual discovery? Because the 75 million people that voted for Trump and wanted him to be in office? were the ones that were more likely than not? Won't the gather, right, and we had the right to January 7, which springs up other areas of law? And, you know, question as to should the President be impeached for using the term wild said it's gonna be wild, but there was really nothing that he said that could be interpreted, I don't think in good faith to encourage violence. So what are your thoughts with it, john, we transfer from we've got an ultra conservative with a Gar Salas, President, we have now an ultra liberal, unfortunately, he's Catholic, which is not an unfortunate thing. I'm Catholic, but he's claiming to have the Catholic Church's backing and yet he is adverse to the very thing that the fabric of Catholicism, I think is a pro life agenda. And he is most definitely opposed to any pro opposition's and ism as part of this transfer of power. Not only assume the nation's greatest military, but I think he's assuming the nation's greatest, unfortunately, genocide machine, which is the leadership of and funding of groups like Planned Parenthood, given them the thumbs up or thumbs down, he's not going to be on their board and not having contact with them directly to make decisions. But am I wrong to say that we have a president now after this kind of transfer of power still in dispute, that you think is going to stand against the funding of abortion, john, or what's your perspective with our president, we the taxpayers who did not have the right to assemble, who in all 50 states were told not to go to the Capitol, who were told Don't worry about this transfer of power and the election certification, even though there's been no legal discovery done. There has not been any examination of the evidence by someone that does not work for the government right to get the secretary of state that are certified on it, but you haven't had any way that people private independent file suit must

    26 min

  4. 01/04/2021

    Civil Rights – COVID & Seasonal Vaccines: Safety, Effectiveness, Law & Ethics

    In this episode of GFILE News, Trenton Garmon interviews Dr. Francis Koe about the COVID-19 Vaccine and other issues concerning with it. Phone Guest - Dr. Francis Koe  Call to Action - Text or Call 855-998-7368 [Notice & Disclosure: TRANSCRIPT Not word-for-word AI Transcribed, but rather an unedited and unrevised Text version provided for key term searches and general outline, audio should be consulted for exact contexts.] Sources: https://www.fox5dc.com/news/studies-suggest-4-vitamins-to-prevent-severe-cases-of-covid-19?utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=facebook&fbclid=IwAR1CTjMIyd3mGPSm7jVEvUjDTVuaI8blfMMrv_eCDakvsNawF4XHnBrcBiQ https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/congressman-elect-luke-letlow-dies-after-covid-diagnosis-n1252520?cid=sm_npd_ms_fb_ma&fbclid=IwAR3OiRtebE7N9ndN0zwjVZMA-Yv9y_dl3xlap2t9hWRApFNgJNVc7ezBqAI https://abcnews.go.com/Health/nurse-tests-positive-covid-19-shortly-vaccinated/story?id=74947995&cid=social_fb_abcn&fbclid=IwAR1--qm3GDp2sF6A2Fsi0OXJrT-IcQi6rjD--HCbH_DvtB2olqIVWMuEeHE Week 10, Part 2 - Legal Docket & Admin Report - FDA Announces Vaccine Approvals and COVID medical products approval  Phone Guest - Dr. Francis Koe Call to Action - Text or Call 855-998-7368 Sources: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-december-28-2020 https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-december-22-2020 Transcript Trenton Garmon Welcome one Welcome all to I Heart Radio. This is attorney Trenton Garmon, we've got a two part show for you today talking about the COVID vaccine with Dr. Francis Koe. She's a medical doctor in Alabama, who I guess has a general practice from maybe a natural medicine perspective as much as anything while embracing the pharmaceutical side of things. And she's going to share with us her perspective on vaccine pushes in the safety tests that we've got. And, of course, we're gonna be talking through civil rights news and legal docket reports as well. Dr. Koe, welcome to the show. Thank you for spending time with us and joining us today. Dr. Francis Koe 1:27 Thank you. Trenton Garmon 1:28 And so as I understand it, you have a general practice in Alabama. And I guess vaccines are something that any general practitioner has administered within their offices, you know, tell us what your practice is composed of the areas of medicine that you practice, primarily. And then we'll get into some of the known and the unknowns about COVID. And the vaccines that are being pushed today. Dr. Francis Koe 1:51 So I have a family medicine practice. I did my residency, medical school and residency in Alabama. And so I practice in northeast Alabama, in a very small town of about 900 people. So I'm the only physician in the area in my town. And I have some nurse practitioners working with me and we see newborns all the way to death. I do home visits, nursing home care, clinic care. And then we also have what we call a direct primary care clinic means yes, people just pay $50 a month and they don't have to use their insurance or if they don't have insurance. They can get some family care at $50 a month. Trenton Garmon 2:35 Is there a name for that program you have there with your practice? Dr. Francis Koe 2:38 Well, the name of my clinic is the so I have wills Valley family medicine, which is my regular insurance clinic that we have had for 13 years at since residency. And then we have Valley care DPC. And we're in the same complex, you know, we have a just a little small office there. And so both clinics so basically in the same office, well, you're perfect for this part of the show, because I believe that having someone look at it from a general practitioner perspective is Uber important because you're taking into consideration all the different types of ailments and issues that people have and come to you with a plan a generalized knowledge. And then of course, specialty knowledge as well. Do you vaccinate in your practice? We used to and for Medicaid for Medicaid children. That it was it was hard to do, because we didn't see enough to keep enough vaccine in the clinic. And so we just decided to stop several years ago, we do have some vaccines like t dhap. tetanus, and so we give those and tetanus shots. And we do do flu vaccines. So and we do write scripts for people who want to do pneumonia vaccines, but we also write scripts for people who want to do shingles vaccines? Trenton Garmon 4:06 Well, we're in a crucial time, of course in national medicine, and a lot of people want to know and I think there are some unknowns that we just have to be at peace about there's always going to be mysteries each year, there seems to be different strands that come out that evade the effectiveness if vaccines are truly overall safe and effective. So for those minds, those people that are not doctors and are curious, what is your opinion with the new variant that's out and the two main vaccines that have been pushed in America right now? Do you think that it is safe and effective? Do you think that there are alternative methods that can be equally effective because I've seen where a lot of the medical community that then towards natural medicine are pushing a four vitamin solution vitamin D, vitamin C and some some others? What are your thoughts with the two that we have out now and what would you recommend the caller the the general audience As far as their personal choice and maybe meeting with their physician and making an actual informed decision. Dr. Francis Koe 5:07 Yes. And I want to reiterate that you are talking about COVID vaccines? Correct. So, so there's two vaccines, Pfizer, biome, biotech and Madonna. So and they're both want. The Pfizer vaccine is purported to be 95% effective. And the Madonna is 94% effective. So they're very, very close. Trenton Garmon 5:30 What does that mean, from a medical doctor top perspective compared to a consumer, because as a product liability attorney, we do civil rights and products work. And we've sued several manufacturers, product device manufacturers and found that, you know, their studies oftentimes are misleading. What does 94% effective mean? Does it mean that they detect antibodies and 94% of the people? Does it mean that you have a 94% chance of not having COVID? at a subsequent time? What's your backside? or What does that truly mean? Dr. Francis Koe 6:01 So it's not real clear in the literature that, you know, they give us exactly what that does mean. So. So basically, when you get a vaccine, it does not mean you will not get the disease. It reduces your risk significantly. And because your body Trenton Garmon 6:24 if you're exposed to it has the amount of antibodies that would then fight off a true infection, or what is the Dr. Francis Koe 6:32 Yeah. So that that's what they're looking at. And it takes anywhere from 14 days to three weeks or longer. And you're in one of the vaccines, you get two shots, two injections, and the other you get both of you actually get two injections, one is three weeks apart, and one is four weeks apart. You do not have immunity. When you first get the injection, it takes at least three weeks to show some immunity. I'm not sure if that's exact in both in both vaccines. Trenton Garmon 7:05 concern there was a report by NBC that a nurse had tested positive for COVID-19 despite a recent vaccination, which I think those who were pro Vax and pro big farm were kind of shocked by says that Dr. Francis Koe 7:18 she got that she was tested positive for that COVID in less than seven days. So she Trenton Garmon 7:24 responds to the vaccine. Are you thinking she could have had it in advance? Dr. Francis Koe 7:28 She could have had it in advance. Okay, so they've not had anybody who got COVID from the vaccine, which is odd, because they put out Trenton Garmon 7:38 that the first dose we think gives you somewhere and this is the to DOS version, which I guess is that Madeira's version? Dr. Francis Koe 7:45 They're both to dos. Okay, Trenton Garmon 7:47 so the first dose puts you around 50%, in the second dose will get you at about 95%. This is an article about Yeah, and B. C. So what you're bringing up is, the safe and effective numbers were given are presuming a time period, I guess. So a month long time period or something about that time period? timeline wise. Dr. Francis Koe 8:07 Yes. And and that may not be in every person. So everybody's going to be an individual. And, you know, so the problem is we had to put these vaccines out quickly, you know, they brought them out quickly. They don't even aren't even sure how long the vaccines are last. They may last 90 days, they may last six months, they may last a year. And then they may not last, you know, we don't even know so Trenton Garmon 8:31 90% effective right at not contracting COVID because your body builds up immunity from that. But we don't know if that immunity last 90 days or last year. And we know that there's other strands that come out I guess I'm just begging the question, because I'm not an anti vaxxer. But I certainly from seeing products liability work, and have them to litigation door closed because of how operation warp speed work. I have got serious concerns about each one of these vaccines that have been rolled out. So what you're bringing up is is not just hey, here's a firm number 94% effective, but you're saying you have to take into consideration each individual patient time period for the vaccines, a two dose exposure or two dose administration of the vaccine. And then what else would someone take into consideration when they're making that decision? Are there two or three four spadoni conditions that you say hey, if your grandfather has this or your mother has this, you probably would more likely than not want to take t

    29 min

  5. 01/04/2021

    Civil Rights – Vaccine Exemption? * FDA Notice regarding Jet7 Voluntary Recall * Was it too late? * Are physicians responsible for medical device failures?

    Phone/Studio Guest - Daniel Lewis or John Mountz Call to Action [Notice & Disclosure: TRANSCRIPT Not word-for-word AI Transcribed, but rather an unedited and unrevised Text version provided for key term searches and general outline, audio should be consulted for exact contexts.] Week 9, Part 2 - Legal & Admin Docket Report - Chubb Insurance Claims  *  Travel with UM/UIM Coverage the New Year  *  FDA chain saw recall of 550k saws    Studio Guest -  Daniel Lewis or John Mountz Call to Action - Call 855-998-7368 Sources: https://www.healthline.com/health/stroke/cerebral-ischemia https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/medical-devices/penumbra-catheter-defect-prompts-voluntary-recall/ https://www.phillipslaw.com/blog/penumbra-catheter-recall https://www.simmonsandfletcher.com/blog/urgent-penumbra-catheter-recall-jet-7-reperfusion-catheter/ Penumbra has issued an urgent recall of all configurations of the Penumbra JET 7 Reperfusion Catheter With Xtra Flex Technology (JET 7 Xtra Flex), owing to the risk for "unexpected death or serious injury" during use for clot removal in stroke patients .The Penumbra JET® 7 Reperfusion Catheter is intended for use in the revascularization of patients with acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion. - Call 855-998-7368. Transcript Trenton Garmon Welcome one Welcome all to I Heart Radio. This is Trenton, Garmon, bringing to you g file news. We are your source for civil rights news. And legal docket reports. We're bringing to you credible information cases that involve encroachment on your civil rights or abuses by big government abuses by big insurance. Got a special guest today by phone mazing attorney, an associate of mine that I'm honored to know named Daniel Lewis. Daniel, welcome to today's show. It's good to have you on. Daniel Lewis 1:23 I think you drink Good to be here, man. Trenton Garmon 1:25 Well, tell me there's been some information that the FDA has pushed out, I see where there is a July 27 of 2020 letter that I guess the pronounciation is Penumbra. Is that the name of the company? Is that how you said? Daniel Lewis 1:40 Correct? Yeah, that's a medical device company. Trenton Garmon 1:43 So they issued a letter, I guess in July. And then as of December the 15th. Tell us kind of what has transpired with regard to that company. And I believe it's at least two, maybe three of their products. Daniel Lewis 1:58 Sure. So in July, the number makes a catheter called the jet seven extra flags. And the FDA asked for pin number to voluntarily removed the catheter because of 14 reports of deaths, and then another 190 or so what they call adverse events. So this is a cash Trenton Garmon 2:24 surgeon would m would use as a tool for stroke victims, is that correct? Daniel Lewis 2:30 That's correct. Okay. So, right, and the FDA, they have databases for medical devices, pharmaceutical products, all of these that track these adverse events and bad things that happen. And that's how that's how the agency would learn about it. So even though the catheter is voluntarily removed, well, the question becomes, okay, how did we get here? Sure. And one of one of the indicators we're seeing about that is there the there's a hedge fund called quintessential Capital Management, that has has shorted the stock, which is to say they, they sold shares of the number they don't own. And it's a risky technique unless you know, that something is amiss with the company. So for those who are the victim of a number of Trenton Garmon 3:22 jet seven catheter injury, you send that have a claim against the number and also against equitable, equitable company or the equity. Daniel Lewis 3:32 It's looking rather, it looks like they would have a claim against the number and the equity companies actions just bolster the strength of that claim. Okay. Trenton Garmon 3:42 And is that in regards, because I'm not sure what all the FDA has put out there. But as I understand it, not every safety study the company purports to have reached and the results are of the credible clinical findings is always trustworthy. Is that something that's been at issue here? That's public information? Or do we know because I can see where there'd be funding? I could see where there would be the, you know, product manufacturer clearly having responsibility, but I can't see the tie unless there's something else as far as marketing goes. What are your thoughts with that? Daniel Lewis 4:16 So? Yeah, so as far as marketing goes, transparency is a big thing with with any sort of medical device. And the allegations we're seeing against the number of is that a doctor on both amti k blsa. was just created totally fake Dr. Fake social media profile with fancy cars fancy homes. He was created to be this purported author of scientific research for Penumbra and he doesn't exist. Trenton Garmon 4:48 Do we know who returned time was the number that that made up this site? This is a doctor who came to this conclusion that they're going to for the purpose of the public's eye, this is our doctor. We've got in places fictional. Who did the numbers people make that decision? Or is that something was put out falsely by the equitable company? Daniel Lewis 5:09 No. So it's looking like so the equity company is actually who brought attention to this. So it's looking like Penumbra created this doctor to put out scientific research that makes its medical device look safe. Trenton Garmon 5:24 that's relevant to the general public, because here we have people that have a propensity and a likelihood have a stroke. And they're anticipating having a product meet the standard that's conveyed to the doctor and also to them as the general public. So it sounds like that that is a kind of a double whammy type of cases there because obviously the general public anyone that's had a number of jet seven procedure, loved ones family members, if there's been a subsequent surgery that was required if your loved one passed away, during a procedure that would have been performed by I guess it would be a vascular doctor. Is that not right, Daniel? Yes. Okay. Yeah, it welcome to contact us 855 99. Trent is the number 855 99. Trent? Tell me that, Daniel. So there's the July 27 letter, and the FDA put pressure on Penan. Dre basically told him, You need to have a voluntary recall, which is just like saying, either recall, or we're gonna force it to be recalled. What is what was the reasoning for the delay? Were they just not sure how, how risky this was to patients? They were still assessing it? Or what was the reason for the delay? If you know, Daniel Lewis 6:37 you mean for the FDA? Trenton Garmon 6:38 Yes. Daniel Lewis 6:40 So I don't know that specific reason I do know, generally, the FDA is not very quick to issue either request for recall or, or some sort of additional warning, which is substantial. It's pretty Trenton Garmon 6:54 healthy, because it allows for the companies to really self regulate. And that's, that's a major concern, when you already have a process that is really not that stringent. You get products all the time that are approved because of a grandfather clause, where it's similar to another product this company has, and I have seen that be a major issue for public safety here with false data, false safety studies by a fictional doctor, that is Uber concerning. Daniel, what are your thoughts with regards to the medical community's awareness? I know that they sent a letter out but do you find I think it to be the case that sometimes doctors use products that are unsafe or are recalled? And they do it because they don't even don't even have the information that awareness? Is that something that you've come across? Yeah, I Daniel Lewis 7:45 find a lot of times the doctors just don't have the information. I when we're talking about Penumbra you have patients that are getting poor information and and patients who cannot be advised by their doctor on this jet seven catheter, because it's looking like not only did Penumbra, invent, research through an invented doctor, but they also did not report all of the dangerous things that were happening. Sure you had patients dying from the jet seven catheter and the number just did not report them to the FDA. Like they're required to do well and Trenton Garmon 8:20 encourage each employee whether it be a nurse practitioner, nurse, nursing assistant doctor, and maintain that healthy accounting system and responsive type policy where if something occurs, you don't only to respond to the medical need. You need to document that whether it's on the vaccine adverse reporting, outlet, whether it's on the medical device, database, those kind of things help us as patients, because not only are we here, Daniel as attorneys offering services to help you and look into inform me about this product, but I do with the medical community is, you know, a community that needs to likely understand how pharmaceutical companies and product manufacturing companies don't always present accurate information. And it's good to make sure that the medical community stays aware of that. We've talked before Daniel on the show about the vaccine push that we're seeing now, have you had much of a chance to form by them opinion about what you think illegally? Are we in a state that exemption would be allowed? I mean, state of like pandemic versus just general welfare? Do you think at this point in time that an exemption is something that we're entitled to or what are your thoughts on it? Daniel Lewis 9:42 You mean, with the with the drug company be exempt from liability? Trenton Garmon 9:46 Yes, well, no, the exemption, which is I think for sure something that's been defined that should be challenged if you have similar studies, or findings that you have here because I don't know that I'm

    25 min

  6. 01/04/2021

    Civil Rights – Systematic Voter Fraud – Presidential Election 2020 – The Machines and the Methods

    Studio Guest - John Mountz, iHeart Special Co-Host Week 8, Part 2 - Erica Kemmer  Legal Docket Report - Mass Incarceration is Modern Slavery - DOJ rightly sues Alabama over prison conditions.  Studio Guest - John Mountz Call to Action - Call 855-998-7368 Sources: https://www.npr.org/2020/12/10/944879818/justice-dept-sues-alabama-over-prison-conditions Transcript Trenton Garmon 0:46 Welcome one welcome all. This is Trenton Garmon with a special co host today. JOHN mounts, we're going to be talking about the election. You're on iheart radio bring to you gee file, news. So many things going on in the world that really makes you curious as to what you can believe and what you should question. But today, I'd like to give some credence to the Trump administration and his legal team and the challenges that they are mounting to the systematic voter fraud and the allegations of systematic voter fraud in the presidential election of 2020. So for segment one we've got titled, The machines and the method as a 12 minute conversation here that I hope will inform the public and john can chime in his perspective on should we push through as a way that people all the way into the time of the swearing in of Bob? And then what would it look like if there was significant evidence that continued to surface, the spot mainstream media's intentional unwillingness to report on what is a major concern for way to people and that's electronic voting International, undoubtedly, international companies, mainly dominion, who is based out of Toronto, they're telling us they're based out of Denver, Colorado, which is not untruth, per se. But it certainly is not full reflection and exhaustive reflection of how the company is operated. So we're gonna dive into that some today on this first part of the show, john, give me your perspective on it, are you for state dollars, because obviously, when in federal dollars when there are filings, the judicial system, it has a, an economic limitation to it, you know, there are people that file and pay the filing fee. But there also becomes prohibitive cost where there's a participation in the court system. And we the people pay that, I think they should push forward and continue to drive the argument, which seems to be true that the voting could have been manipulated. And there are interests that could run counter to the duty of each one election officials who contracted with dominion and the other companies and this is something I think that is right to be challenged. What are your perspectives on that job? John Mounts 3:19 Well, Trenton, I think that there's a lot of manipulation that that was possible. And the way the machines were designed, they were designed for the to be able to be manipulated. And there was all these irregularities that happened. It seemed that people so bad, I won't say all people, but there were people involved in the process, who so badly wanted a win for anybody but Trump and I don't think for a minute they were they were rooting for Biden per se, they were just voting not for Trump. And that was, you know, de facto Biden. Trenton Garmon 3:50 So in your perspective, then the anti trumpers because we didn't see a lot of public show support for Biden, but he allegedly has 80 million votes, a large percentage of which would have been calculated through the source coding of the Dominion system. There's a article that's come out recently that Dominion put out in a publication on their website, claiming that it's a reckless dis information campaign that Trump's attorneys are leading. Do you think that the public is informed at this point to really understand and dissect? What is the what is the claims being made by the Trump administration? Are they something that should be sold out? Do you think there's a general understanding of that? Do you think most people are still confused as to the dominion and the s and s and other company that other companies that have the digital machine? Do you think there's a full understanding among the we the people or do you think there's still a lot of disinformation and a lack of real mental faculties, if you will, with regards to that formation process, you understand? And think that there's there's irregularities because of the software. Do you think that most people just believe it's about stuffing? Do you think that people are just angry and not sure exactly how to respond to an election that didn't go their way? John Mounts 5:11 Well, there's two things when you talk about do you think people have the full understanding? No. And a lot of them are trying to understand it. There's a lot of people who there's some who say it was absolutely right. But they don't really know. And they don't really care because their guy won. There's some people who are very upset. And because because their guy lost, but they don't understand exactly the why. And the question is, which one? How how'd it happen? was it was it that it was stolen electronically? It wasn't stolen by people? Was it a combination? For example, we've heard reports, I'm not going to say whether they're valid or not, we've heard reports that there were people at the polls who would run the same name 20 ballots through the machine three, four or five times, Trenton Garmon 5:50 which would be ballot feeding, John Mounts 5:52 exactly running up the counts. There are reports that, you know, extra ballots were pulled out from places he heard these reports of in Atlanta, were specifically in in Fulton County, where people would pull out all these ballots that were they called pristine ballots, meaning that they were never folded yet they were supposedly mailed in now, you can't really mail about in the unfolded form, you got to fold it up and put an envelope. So that makes you wonder what happened there. There's so many of those situations, little one offs, you know, okay, maybe you can invalidate 20 ballots this way and 30 ballots that way, and whatever. And what the one side is saying, well, there's not enough to have affected the outcome. But we don't know because no one's really dug into it. Trenton Garmon 6:31 It's a beautiful thing to bring up. Because the cumulative evidence is what has to be considered in the line is how you get there. The different ways I think, is what we've got to evaluate. I have major concern. And I think if I was representing the Trump administration or on their legal team, given feedback, and here's an objective attorney giving public interest information, I would challenge actual contracts himself with dominion. How can a national election we're officers that are election officers have a duty to the best interests of our nation, they have a duty to the United States Constitution. And yet they have allowed for a foreign company to control the source data, the actual electronic results, which could be manipulated. And that's where the concern arises, in my mind is the democrats are saying this is not a possibility this couldn't even occur and get I'm a libertarian, I've represented city council members that were Democrats, I've represented Republicans. But I am deeply concerned by the fact that we've got a Toronto based company in 24, out of the 50 states contracted with that Toronto based company that we know common sense tells us computers can be manipulated, and I've had my own experience with it in the legal field, it was the proper human correction. But I was sharing with a friend and the clerk did the right thing and bringing correction to a complaint that I had filed, but to show you that there can be digital mistakes and errors that have to be overseen and have to be corrected. I filed a lawsuit the day of the deadline, which is referred to as a statute limitations and got a filing certificate. But the clerk's office the way that the program and software is set up for the federal court filing system, approved it on there in the day after. So the complaint did actually get kicked to us through email, indicated the day after our statute of limitations said Ryan, called judge Scott Kugler, his office mazing federal court system, we have amazing federal court judges, and they did an override because we had a certificate for the date it was correctly filed. In the complaint literally, that I have, in one hand, if I'm standing holding my file, and then I have in the other hand will show two different dates of which it was filed because of a override done by someone in a position of authority the proper way. So we had a human come in and correct. The software glitch, the software process from step one to two, three, step three being it's in the court system. And at that point in time, it's not just electronically filed, but it's been assigned to a judge and the judge has received it in their cube. If we know that these can occur on a daily basis with software that we do have, how can officers of the United States sworn to uphold and protect the constitution for the best interest of this nation? Who should be looking at it from a nationalist perspective, not a globalist perspective? How can they contract with a company that's providing to 24 different states services for something that's going to be controlled or could be controlled by an entity is controlled by an entity outside the United States but could be could be controlled by someone that has an adverse interest to the United States? Can you actually on its face, john, as a citizen, can you say that you think those contracts with Dominion were were legitimate were they void on their face? I mean, that would be 24 out of 50 states right there that would justify some type of re election, some type of campaign being chalked back up. And I guess a loaded question becomes if that's one of the wise electronically, would you be for another another election? Would you be for setting it aside? And do you think those duties can be fulfilled canon internation

    25 min

  7. 12/14/2020

    Gfile.Radio Show – Dec. 12th, 2020

    Week 7, Part 1 Civil Rights - 1st Amendment - Freedom of Worship & Liberty Rights In the midst of COVID, do online services provide the same spiritual experience as in person?   Phone Guest - Rev. Justin Clay Rushing of Chariot of Fire Ministries, Virginia Beach, Virginia  Call to Action -  Week 7, Part 2 Legal Docket Reporting - U.S. Supreme Court finds NY Restrictions Unconstitutional & Facebook sued by U.S. Government Phone Guest - Rev. Justin Clay Rushing of Chariot of Fire Ministries, Virginia Beach, Virginia Call to Action -  Sources: https://www.npr.org/2020/11/27/939449928/supreme-court-backs-religious-challenge-to-new-york-covid-19-restrictions https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/26/politics/supreme-court-religious-restrictions-ruling-covid/index.html https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a87_4g15.pdf https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/post/613/covid-19-and-the-first-amendment-a-running-report-oct-28 Transcript Trenton Garmon Welcome Welcome. Welcome one Welcome all to Trenton, Garmon live here on I Heart Radio get a special guest today, someone that is near and dear to my heart a dear friend but also a highly respected scholar. And for those of you who follow Jesus is mainly considered to be an evangelist, Reverend Clay Rushing is with us we're going to be talking about your first amendment right. And the free exercise of religion calls. For we launch into that let me just welcome clay and get him to briefly introduce himself to those who are tuning in. Hey, Clay, welcome to the show. Clay Rushing Hello, how are you, my friend? Trenton Garmon I am doing well. All things considered in this world. How are you doing, brother? Clay Rushing I'm just just trying to love Jesus through through all of this chaos and craziness man. I think I just finished my demon degrees. from United Theological Seminary, I stand corrected. Trenton Garmon Reverend Dr. Clay rushing, right. Clay Rushing Yeah. Amen, brother. Trenton Garmon You are credentialed. What tell us your thoughts, we'd get to segments for those who are tuning in a 12 minute segment, where we're going to talk about the civil rights news. It's relevant to you as a member of We the People, if you're an American, we have certain constitutional and alienable rights. These are natural rights that are inherent when we're born, they're inherent in the sense that they are endowed upon us by our Creator. And we believe that one of those rights is the right to freely worship. There are no persei clauses set out on any of the amendments, but we draw some of the language out of them. And we refer to that portion of law, whatever it's your turn to specifically as far as your life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness. So that narrowly tailored area of law called civil rights. We draw out specific clauses from the terminology and there is clearly in the first amendment right. A right to gather to worship. And the Supreme Court has just issued what I think is a good decision. I think it may be like a flash in the pan impactfully speaking because it was entered on a mergency motion, and not an actual appeal to the Supreme Court, the writ of cert, or through a adverse finding that's taken up on appeal. But clay, what is your perspective? I know you're not too familiar, maybe with the ruling and the facts that the court was considering, but as a pastor, as a Reverend as an evangelist that travels and you know, you take I believe people's spiritual life as they are and you're helping them to advance and to grow in their faith. And that understanding can the First Amendment be fulfilled in the same means through online streaming? And what are your thoughts about this emergency petition being granted and the lifting of those Jewish worshippers and Catholic worshipers and all people of faith in New York Clay Rushing was a wonderful decision. Because I truly do believe that, for me comes down to freedom of choice. I believe that I believe in what the First Amendment says, Congress shall make no law that that it hit that inhibits our right together and her worship, if you take is you is your own work this thread that I do not think that any, any state any state has has a wall saying with you that this is this is what we need to do during the bed devic Trenton Garmon motion? Sure. for clarification, you know, the the First Amendment does include executive orders, and this was an executive order issued by the governor of Governor Cuomo. And what often happens is you get a miss application kind of a jamming of the machine, if you will, throwing a wrench in it by way of executive orders that aren't constitutional on their face, but ended up taking time to work up through the judicial process. To be challenged, and increasingly here enough como and know what at what I see many times in many of our leaders because we're all fallen humans, but he sought not to see the executive order challenge on its face, but he actually gave an exception to his order, and was going to allow the Catholic Diocese and the people of Israel, which is one of the groups in Israel of America, agua Israel, of America's name of the party, but he was going to allow them to continue to gather worship, as an exception to the rule. But the rule still stayed in place. It was just not applied. So it's a kind of like an edict, if you will, if we were to be some totalitarian rule, which began in the think de facto we kind of are, but point is away that it was implemented, is still a violation of the First Amendment very clearly on its face. The court hasn't found that. But the court has found grounds to grant the emergency petition and live the implementation or the actual execution of the order. So it remains on appeal. And they're not, you know, they're not prohibiting I don't think people from gathering there. But you don't know when when we say prohibiting is that an actual thing that's happening day by day based on the presence of city officials, because sometimes there's a deterrent effect that I find to be just as difficult to deal with when you're looking at government overreach encroachment into people's lives. You know, when we're saying to people, there's another court case that went up that challenge the criminality of a mask requirement, but when you're saying people can freely gather, but yet they have to wear their masks, but you position police around their city officials or you send people throughout the week to check every CDC guideline is is that freedom? I don't think it is. And so, with the First Amendment, in this ruling, do you think that now that people can read gather that we're going to see that actually occur in practice? Would you think some of the governmental presence and just the general fear is going to continue to deter people from from gathering? What are your perspectives on that as a pastor and as a doctor? Clay Rushing I, I truly, I truly believe that. Like I said, before, everything comes down to personal choice to breed them, thanks. If yes, if people want to gather, Trenton Garmon they should be able to. I am a big believer in physically gathering, because the Bible does say you do not forsake Islam, we have yourself. Well, it's natural law, when you get in people's presence. as odd as it is, there's a study that says we emit about 600,000 particles of skin a day, this may seem strange, but when you're in somebody's presence, you know you're breathing them in, you're actually communing with them as a spiritual term that a lot of people use. So that fellowship, your Bible says, Let's not neglect doing that. But here in this situation, we have the health department that was allowing large stores in Brooklyn, they could literally gather hundreds of people and shop there in any given day. And thank goodness, thank the Lord, thank Jesus that the Supreme Court found what they found, because just up the street, just nearby the synagogue was prohibited. And of course, the Catholic parish as well. And really any other way the health officials chose to on the ground interpreted, which if you get a client comes back, you know, talk in biblical terms to the term lawless. You know, we're in a time that is unprecedented, which I think every time in history is but we see the magnification of so much of the intersect of the citizenry and big government, that it is hyper concerning. And I think we live in a time of the fact of lawlessness where people want to follow the law, they want to obey, they want to understand but they also have so many conflicting things that they're being told that it makes it difficult to even follow the law. What are your thoughts on gathering? If it comes back to there's charges against the leaders for asking people to gather there's a case it's up on appeal now where a pastor was arrested and charged with a crime? Of course, you know, there's still remedies and ways for that to be challenged. It's in the criminal court itself, you know, affirmative defenses, but those groups of people are told not to gather. Do you think that we're going to see that type of enforcement again, or do you think here in America we've had the court issue a ruling that people believe is given them the right to gather and they'll get back to kind of normal life What are your thoughts? Clay Rushing I would hope so. Every state is different. Um, The problem to me, Fred, is this the pastors are trying. They want to do the right thing with their people. They don't want people to get sick. But I think what has happened is, honestly comes down to do you trust God or not a matter Trenton Garmon of? Sure. Which is inherent in the right to really gather that's inherent in the freedom. Yeah. Clay Rushing Yes. And so I'm not saying what, we're clear on that. I wear a mask. Because my wife, as we do, that takes it should go, Trenton Garmon you got Oh, by the happy wife, happy love. Ri

    24 min

  8. 12/08/2020

    Gfile.Radio Show – Dec. 5th, 2020

    Week 6, Part 1 Civil Rights - Cannabis Is the state of Alabama discriminatory against the Cannabis plant?   Phone Guest - H. Marty Schelper - President of the Alabama Chapter of Republicans Against Marijuana Prohibition Week 6, Part 2 Legal Docket Reporting -  Phone Guest - H. Marty Schelper - President of the Alabama Chapter of Republicans Against Marijuana Prohibition Sources:  https://www.al.com/news/2020/11/medical-marijuana-reaches-mississippi-will-it-come-to-alabama-next.html https://www.mpp.org/states/alabama/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_in_Alabama https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_defense Transcript Trenton Garmon 0:17 Welcome all to I Heart Radio. This is Trenton Garmon bringing to you the G file news we are your source for civil rights news and legal docket reports we bring to you weekly, what we believe lines up with natural law and hopefully neighborly love get with us in this first segment, a two part show this week, a black thinker to those who are for natural medicine Marty Schelper is her name and she is a president of the Alabama chapter of Republicans against marijuana prohibition a group that is one I'm new to not heard of. But obviously doesn't mean they've not been doing a lot because there's a national chapter and then of course here in the state of Alabama, she is the president. So she's joining us by phone doing a tele phonic call in here telephonic conference and just going to discuss today is a state of Alabama discriminatory against the cannabis plant when you consider all the medical evidence and the studies and she's going to be able to chime in and help us understand where it is legislatively and help us understand what has transpired bringing it to where it is now that we could see an Alabama the re Institute reinstitution of you if you will, because prior to the early 1900s, there was no prohibition against cannabis and hemp was considered to be a common product natural product that was used. So what are your thoughts? Miss Marty, share with us what the chapters do and how you think this will benefit the people of the state of Alabama. Marty Schelper 1:54 Okay, Trent, we really appreciate you having us on our radio. Thank you so much. We've been a chapter since October the 16th of 2017. We've been here for three years. We're slowly building. It is geared towards Republicans, but we have people from all political persuasions that are participating with our organization. We're trying to educate the citizens of the state of Alabama, that the laws and propaganda that they've been fed since 1937. With the marijuana Tax Act, are erroneous cannabis is a natural, safe plan. It was given to us by our Creator. When he created the planet, he gave us the plants that we needed to heal our bodies and to heal the nations and we're here to restore cannabis to its natural beauty. Trenton Garmon 2:47 Have you seen a lot of support from the republican entrenched? individuals, if you will, those power players that I would think normally are considered to be very conservative, and I'm using the term conservative from a Christian perspective and more likely than not Protestant and maybe even radical perspective? So my question really stems to do you have opposition within the Republican Party? Because it seems to be an amazing thing that you've allowed the process to bear out so much, so that who you are within the Republican Party, seeking for natural medicine to be pushed, but as I understand it, that's been one of the most opposition or the most opposition or the two primary parties. What kind of pushback Have you seen within the Republican Party, if any? Marty Schelper 3:36 Well, I just want to bring something up that most people do not realize it. Cannabis seems to be a progressive liberal baby that's pushed along, but republicans in the sight of Alabama have sponsored and passed every cannabis legislation that we currently have is the law. So I guess Trenton Garmon 3:57 my once promoting it for February is a Republican, is that correct? Marty Schelper 4:03 Right. He actually sponsored lynnie saw television and that was passed by the Alabama legislature. And is that the one the compact, Trenton Garmon 4:12 a germ because of COVID. And we're looking for it to be represented in February's of a different bill. Marty Schelper 4:20 No, that legislation was actually passed in 2014. The compassion Act, which was Senate Bill 165, you talked about? Yeah. The sb 165. The compassion act was sponsored by Senator Tim Nelson in Florence, Alabama. And it was passed in the Senate after the Alabama cannabis commission did everything that Kay avea asked them to do just to make sure that everybody was on the same page and was on board with the legislation. And it did pass the Senate. It was on its way to the house health committee when Governor Ivey shut down the legislature because of COVID. So Alabama republicans against marijuana prohibition actually sent an email and a letter to Governor Avi last week, calling for a special session and hopes that maybe this legislation could still be passed as a 2020. Bill. We have not had any correspondence or any communication back from her office. But if we have to wait until 2021 legislative session, which will begin in February, we're basically going to have to start from square one, which is not a good thing for the citizens of Alabama because most people don't realize every time this can get kicked down the road, and the compassion Act is a medicinal cannabis bill. Trenton Garmon 5:50 Isn't Isn't that your primary opportunity to have it passed for the state though, because if we go through the history of it looks like Carla's law was 2014. And that allowed because of course people are concerned about the adverse effects, the psychoactive effects that THC and CBD and the terpenes can have. And there is a clear awareness, I think, among all adults that any type of medication, it cloning, pharmaceutical medications, primarily, if you look at the injury and some of the death cases from bizarre responses that people have had to sleep in pills and other type of medication that is in the psychiatric realm, if you will of pharma, pharmacological medicine. But if you look and evaluate that, isn't that probably your best opportunity in February, you said there's a quicker way that you think the government in the state of Alabama could could approve and could push cannabis for medication? Marty Schelper 6:45 Yes, and I do want to thank you for correcting me on that. Yes, Carly's law was 2014 Lenny's law was in 2016. And yes, if we can get a special session and get the compassionate Act passed, that would be great for this would be great for the citizens is because every time this can get kicked down the road, the people in the state of Alabama who need the medicinal cannabis are having to wait six months longer before they can even you know, have access to it because once the legislation is passed, the legislation has to be implemented and come with Trenton Garmon 7:22 conversation when you say people who need it lay out for us your case because you know, we're not talking about Cheech and Chong, they need to have their journey across the state of Alabama but you're referring to children who have epilepsy, you're referring to people who have PTSD or other neurological conditions that can be treated by way of these natural plants. Is that your pitch for the possum? Marty Schelper 7:45 Absolutely correct. Alzheimers disease, cancer patients, Parkinson's, our veterans need cannabis for PTSD and cannabis is the Safer Choice. And of course, no one has died from cannabis Trenton Garmon 8:00 legal in 37 out of 50 states as we stand now, and I know that it's near and dear to your heart, you brought up cancer. Share with our listeners, if you would just some of your story about what made you so passionate about this natural medicine being accepted and the prohibition in the state of Alabama are no longer existing and the barriers not being there. Tell us a little bit about your story. Marty Schelper 8:24 Oh, thank you so much. My dear sister passed away in August of 2012. And I was very familiar with cannabis, but I had no idea that it had medicinal properties. And people are being cured and people don't like to hear the word cured, but they are being cured from cannabis. I mean, from cancer with cannabis. And if I had known in 2012 or 2011, my sister would have been illegally healed but now she's legally dead. So what's something like this becomes personal for you? And you really get out there and educate yourself on the truth about cannabis. I'm really not sure how you could possibly even say that cannabis is a bad thing. I mean, people think it's the devil's lettuce. But it's not I mean, this is a medicinal plant that was put here for our healing. research has been done in Israel for over 50 years. Paid for by the US taxpayer. A scientist Dr. Raphael mushroom, and he is the one who discovered that THC Delta nine school he has healing properties. Trenton Garmon 9:38 You're bringing up spiritual things anytime someone acknowledges the devil. You know, we'd like to be sure that the name of the Lord Jesus is pushed out there as well. But I have found that I could be wrong about this but that radical Protestantism and I'm not talking about your everyday follower of Jesus, but those who read the word and and love the Lord that have have come to a place of Implementing moral perspectives through law. I found that to be the biggest hurdle that we have. What What do you think is the opposing force if you're bringing up the people of Israel, political Israel that's accepted, basically in the ancient Near East as a Standard Oil that they would have in their in their kind of domestic kit, if you will with them what has been the biggest stronghold that stood in

    22 min

  9. 12/08/2020

    Gfile.Radio Show – Nov. 28th, 2020

    Civil Rights - Global Political Ethics - Weapons of Mass Destruction  Studio Guest - John Mountz Chinese Virologist, Li-Meng Yan Claims Coronavirus was "Intentionally" Released.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Li-Meng_Yan https://www.newsweek.com/china-virologist-li-meng-yan-covid-coronavirus-lab-made-kill-me-disappear-1541659 https://www.cnbctv18.com/healthcare/chinese-virologist-claims-covid-19-made-in-wuhan-lab-says-report-6901571.htm https://nypost.com/2020/09/14/chinese-virologist-posts-report-claiming-covid-19-was-made-in-wuhan-lab/ https://www.baltimoresun.com/coronavirus/sns-nyt-chinese-virologist-covid-19-misinformation-distortions-20200918-kgxjktkl5ne4nhxcfdxmzjxkbm-story.html Week 5, Part 2 Legal Docket Reporting - Trump Election Challenges Studio Guest - John Mountz The Evidence.  https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-threatens-lawsuits-court-challenges-hitting-dead-ends/story?id=74388659 https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-54724960 https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-legal-challenges-explained-075b2ef6f75e9dd3026d54fc38b81920 https://www.businessinsider.com/donor-25m-group-trying-find-election-fraud-wants-refund-report-2020-11 Transcript Trenton Garmon 0:17 All right, welcome one Welcome all to G file radio. This is Trenton, Garmon live. I've got with me as a studio guest today the wonderful phenomenal employee of I Heart Radio, John Mounts. And we're going to be talking about the questions that are still not fully answered and being reported on with regards to the release of the virus. And what is the source of the release? Whoo, hot, of course, is the area that I don't think has been disputed geographically as being the original place from which this virus that has shaken the world was released from, but in September, which surprisingly, just died on the vine, it seems, but I think is going to have new life breathed into it. This question of was the release intentional? Or was it negligent, arose? And I believe was answered. So for us as Americans, we the people, there are some questions about corporate America. And their involvement with big farm being represented on the global scale now is probably the largest revenue agent now, of the of the financial systems, they are receiving more money than any other sphere of business and sciences and of really in any type of industry. So what type of ethical obligations are our world leaders going to have moving forward, whether this virus was released intentionally or not released intentionally, because clearly, this is a very different situation than prior pandemics. We have, arguably a manmade virus that has been released and it has shaken the world to the extent that each one of us is now a purchaser. In the vaccine industry. 150 million vaccines are going to be pushed and promoted that are not inherently bad or inherently good, but are for sure something that we're going to be happy to answer for ourselves, do we believe we should take one or family take one, but in the big picture, side of things on the big picture side of things? What do we do as a people to ensure that this does not happen again? And how do we process process out the information that we do have the information that says I came for a particular area now we've got labs and a scientist, a biologist, putting out information that says she knows it to have been intentionally released? So the global ethics is what we're talking about today? I know that is a mouthful and something difficult to get your mind around. But as john here is with us with me Pitts and back and forth his question, john, what are your thoughts? Does it make a difference in your mind, as a way to people voter is someone that's going to ask government to protect us or life liberty, the pursuit of happiness to secure those God given rights? Is it is it going to be a question in your mind of what they should do following this that changes if it was intentional? Or do you think it doesn't matter one way or the other, whether it was intentional or negligent, John Mounts 3:24 printed into absolutely matters, I go back to something that happened. I don't know if you remember this or not remember, the September 11 attack in 2011, on the MV Ghazi. And they immediately came out the government, our government came out and immediately said that was done. Because there was an uprising and uprising because of a movie that was made. And people were very upset about this movie. And that's the reason why they attacked the the embassy. And that turned out to be completely false. But they got ahead, they got ahead of it. And they put that propaganda, I will call it propaganda out there to kind of quell any sort of questions about Wait a minute, maybe somebody was asleep at the switch at the State Department. Maybe we made some mistakes on our end, they wanted to go ahead and put that out there. And I see the exact same thing happening here. The Chinese government said, Well, we don't want people questioning our motives. We don't want a question. Let's go ahead and say there was a, something happened in the wet market. You remember the original story, something about it was first it was a bat. And then it was well, no, it wasn't a bat. It was a snake. It was eaten by a bat. And they said well, no. And they had and they went back and forth about all these different animals that they might have been selling. But it turned out that was all fake. They said, Okay, well, true. It was a wet market in Wu Han was just so happened to be right next to this lab. So it makes me wonder, did the Chinese government know all along that this thing came out of that lab? Trenton Garmon 4:42 Good question. John Mounts 4:43 And then if so, if so, did they know they think that was a mistake that there was some sloppy guy working in the lab. We just accidentally contaminated himself and then and, you know, began community spread there and we won or or did they create the virus there in the lab? And I mean spread to the people, because it just so happens that Wu Han is the center of rail transport in China. So that will be a great place for something to start and quickly spread throughout the country. Trenton Garmon 5:13 Good point, john. John Mounts 5:14 And so I and these are all questions like, I don't have any answers. I don't have any proof. But these are coincidences that I think are too coincidental. And so did China have the intent that we would, we will manipulate the global market, which they're a participant in there, never forget that they're, they're a very, they're a developing country. And they're a very big economic power all at the same time. And it would be in their best interest if the entire world caught some horrible virus that then slowed down the world's economy. And if that's the case, then maybe China should be culpable. Maybe there should be some penalty that I'm talking to economic penalty Trenton Garmon 5:50 that would go to them Sure. Before the United Nations John Mounts 5:53 that Yeah, and I don't know what the body is. And when to use example of Trenton Garmon 5:57 the spyware that people get on their computer. Many times, those companies have been sued. And it's been determined that depending on the type of virus or what particular version that some of the software companies themselves, we're working with, knew that these type of computer viruses were going to be and actively took part in releasing them on the internet, if you will, and sending it. So here we have something that's similar in economics and the question of ethics with big farm, the United States government, China, what do we do when we're forced as consumers to buy 150 million vaccines from what could have been an intentionally released virus? So john, I think you are right on point marches when we first of course, became aware publicly that there was a question of, Hey, is there something that has been released? it's going to affect us in pockets are an areas or is it going to affect us nationally? And here we've got this article in September, several that have been released when by way of the New York Post. Now they're by way of the New York Times. Oddly enough, the New York Post article puts out that the virologist is not debunking any market climate is bringing forth truth. She wasn't seeking to say this is accurate or inaccurate. She's saying I worked it's fact testimony witness testimony, she came out with no agenda whatsoever. It does happen to default, the bond market theory that it was released negligently by way of this Wu Han fishmarket. But clearly, the truth is if she was working on those projects, that allowed for the virus to be developed and is reporting now to the news outlets that are willing to talk with her collusion Tucker Carlson that this was intentionally made, we have to be as a we the people and we have to be as consumers concerned about that. She went on in her article to say not only was it intentionally released, but the laboratory creation of this Coronavirus, is convenient and can be accomplished in approximately six months. So at any point in time, there can be a laboratory in some negative woods, some corner of the desert, some and Arctic place that can create a virus that can bring the world to its knees and force us to become consumers. If we don't elect to not take a vaccine or if we elect dude to take a vaccine one way or the other. We're consumers as taxpayers because we're purchasing this from Big Pharma. So I do think, john, you're right, I think it matters. And I think the initial report should be drawn into question about the market place. And is it as we've talked about before, the two factor, global situation that we see ourself, and we see a major biological, biological, economic weapon that's been used, you can call it a weapon of mass destruction, however you choose to articulate it. That is what has o

    27 min

  10. 12/08/2020

    Gfile.Radio Show – Nov. 21st, 2020

    In this episode, host Trenton Garmon interviews John Todd about the pandemic and the upcoming vaccines. Transcript Trenton Garmon 0:13 welcome welcome welcome welcome one Welcome all to G file radio your civil rights news and legal docket report. Coming to you Dave from I Heart Radio studios. This is Trenton Garman attorney and I've got a guest co host here with me. JOHN wants to say hello, John Todd. John Todd 0:36 Welcome to news ready 1055 w e RC on this beautiful Saturday afternoon. How fun is it to be discussing things that are relevant civil rights issues and cases that have been filed that pertain to your everyday life. Of course, public interest is something near and dear to my heart as an attorney, we're gonna be talking today about a very hot topic that involves not just big government, but big pharma. And the question kind of boils down to this young, are you gonna take the COVID-19 vaccine? I don't know. I don't know if I'm gonna take it or not. Because I always get my flu shot. So it seems like a natural thing, I should want it. But at the same time, it's a brand new thing. I don't know if I'm excited about putting a brand new thing in me right off the bat, maybe let a few other people do it first, you know, so you're saying brand new was rushed through, I guess five times faster. Trump has boasted about months. And that's a good thing or a bad thing. But they broke record speed having to prove before any other drug really 20% of the time period for vaccine has been proved before. So you're saying you don't know. But you take your annual and you take your seasonal shots as recommended. Is that correct? Absolutely. I always do. I do believe in vaccines. I do think that they work. I but I at the same time. I know they're made by man and man makes mistakes. So I'm not I don't do it blindly. Okay. Well, the net, the New England Journal for medicines, but what they're referring to is the vaccine nationalism, which is a real big push. We've gone quarter this article from 200 vaccine candidate companies down to five, we've had 300 million order doses ordered. Court operation warp speed. That's the goal. 150 have been paid for. So how many Americans we have at this time? Yeah. Ah, pretty close to 300,000 plus four, well, plus 400 million, I believe you mean three out of eight? I think we're over. Yeah, sorry. Yeah. Nice to get population. Jefferson County. Yeah. Yeah, about 300 million. So we're about to see some major shifts and changes in public health and how its administered. So if you were to take the vaccine, john, would you do it at a private clinic? Or would you be willing to go to lock a checkpoint, a military checkpoint? If those are put out? I'm hoping we don't have to do it at military checkpoints. I hope it doesn't come to that in this country. But you know, I probably do it just like I did a flu shot and I go down to my local pharmacy, and I'd have the pharmacist to give it to me in my arm if that's how its administered. The big five companies modera Oxford University working with S 10, Zurich, Johnson and Johnson, Merck and Pfizer are the ones that have been approved, those four, get a $2.2 billion contract that's gone out. So these companies have a huge interest in the question really boils down to, do you have informed consent to take the vaccine? If you were to john, do Google and internet research on the COVID-19 vaccine? What would be your thoughts about finding good adequate material? Well, you definitely want stuff that comes from say, the, the FDA or somebody, not just the company because the company can always toot their own horn. So I would much rather have something from somebody who is at least they seem like they're independent. Do you think the companies are independent enough to have the 20% record speed? Is that for you something that's concerning? Are you thinking they probably are independent enough that the studies are trustworthy? Do you think there's been any tanking because of the rush to the studies or No, I'd like to believe there hasn't been I'd like to believe that just because we work fast doesn't mean we worked well. There's a lot of things we do quickly that we do. Well, you know, it doesn't isolate Sara Lee mean sloppy. Sure, we'd get us news is put out what to know about the timing and distribution of Coronavirus vaccines. If these two vaccines get approval talking about two that have already been pushed through one by Pfizer and one by modera. Emergency youth have use authorization that could be up to 40 million doses may be available in December. In this attorney Trenton Garman talking with john guest co host today about the COVID-19 vaccine and do we have informed consent adequately available for us as consumers and patients and then we're going to get into in segment to the right to redress. JOHN has said he probably would take the vaccine hoaxes not going to be stuck in his arm at some military post but of course The Trump administration has said the military may be administering it. There are contracts that the government has entered into with both CVS and Walgreens that have been reported on. So there's going to be distribution sites, at probably locations. But here, according to US News and World Report, there's 40 million doses that are probably going to be delivered starting in December. And this is from the National Director of the Institute of Health, Francis Collins, who told see in in that this week, so john, you then see, you know, we're creeping up into December, spikes are going up. And of course, the COVID. And vaccines are the question now, what are your thoughts about not just the preventative measures, but about those who actually get COVID? In the asymptomatic? Right, are we rushing into judgment and the change of how we treat an individual who's who's obtained a virus? I mean, we see a national scale. Now on a push for vaccines, and we've got to have more, we got to hot, asymptomatic, right in the low mortality rate lower than the seasonal flu. What are your thoughts of that? Some people are saying that there's a major ethical concern. If you take an artificially created virus, and you allow vaccine companies to then benefit from it being released, what are your thoughts that will trend it is concerning in that this is the first time we've ever seen an illness where we've said so quickly that everyone has to line up at everyone has to be vaccinated right now, there are a lot of things out there that we've eradicated through vaccinations, smallpox, things like that. But I don't think it was done quite this quickly on this order. Sure. So you're concerned about the the time of it, but I guess you nailed the wood to the to the stud there by bringing up the reality that this is a very unique situation, since we have a global pandemic that was artificially created. And now we have big government with big farm that's given us an artificial, if you will solution to the problem that they created. What does that say to you, john, with regards to the conflict of interest, some of these agencies may have been approved, and then the vaccines and the medications that billions of our taxpayer dollars are being spent on this is modera, land of the US COVID-19 contract worth up to 8 billion? What does that say to you as a consumer if you've got a company that's receiving $8 billion, and there was another company that just happenstance to have released or intentionally released the virus that now $8 billion of our taxpayer money is going to vaccinate against what are your thoughts with the ethics of the FDA and these big pharma companies? And just this new question that we see in public health? What's written it does kind of make me wonder, I borrow a phrase from ross perot used to always say that chicken is garden, no, the fox is guarding the henhouse, where the chickens. So I am a little worried that is the same company that is, is prescribing this essentially for everyone is the one who made it, you know, you do kind of wonder if there is, as you said, a conflict of interest. Let me go back a little bit. I didn't fully understand. Explain from a legal standpoint, because I am not. You're the you're the lawyer here. What do you mean by when you say informed consent? to great question. So, medically speaking, a professional supposed to be sharing face to face, that's the standard the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has put out for us and the Alabama Supreme Court is given similar findings fan vs. Smith, which for those of y'all who were fans of the code of Alabama, that's 479, southern section 1150. But it says there's these two elements that have to be in place, the physician has to have the patient, consider all material risk in the process. So it can be in writing, the patient can sign that way. But I believe the standard of care would require it also to be followed up even for the state of Alabama, with an in person appointment. The second prong is showing that a reasonably prudent patient with all the characteristics that should be considered and risk should be considered, has declined after that, that patients had informed consent. So with segment one the right to informed consent with of course of these vaccines, I don't know that the medical professionals who are going to be administering them can really give those those people even the bare minimum. And I obviously have issue with the great hindrance that we have as plaintiff lawyers advocating for people with the right to redress. We'll talk about that summons segment too. If you have a medical malpractice case or nursing home injury do feel welcome to contact us. 855 99 Trent is the number that's 855 99 trend, we can help you with nursing home falls, we can help even neglect surgical breaches by physicians, any of those types of medical issues that you would like for us to consider and to consider be present

    23 min
See All (13)

About

In this podcast we discuss Civil Rights, hosted by attorney Trenton Garmon.

Information

  • Creator
    GFILE NEWS
  • Years Active
    2020 - 2021
  • Episodes
    13
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2020 GFILE NEWS
  • Show Website
    GFILE Radio