Grants Management Experts

Jasmine Markanday

If you're looking to excel in grant management and maximize your grant funds' potential, then you should definitely check out Jasmine Markanday's podcast. In the Grants Management Expert Podcast, Jasmine shares her insights and expertise on various aspects of grant management, including tips, tricks, and best practices. Tune in to learn how to navigate the world of grants management and take your grant funding to new heights.

  1. 6d ago

    Get It in Writing: Prior Approval, Cost Limits, and Unallowable Costs (200.407–200.411)

    In this episode I skip the read-through of the regulations and instead walk through a real audit scenario, the kind I see with clients, to ask what went wrong, which requirements apply, and how it could've been prevented. The setup: a nonprofit with a health grant and a capital improvement grant gets audited. Findings: a $45,000 payback ($4,000 from the health grant, $41,000 from the capital improvement grant) and a much bigger issue, $1.5 million in health grant costs the nonprofit must either refund outright or work with the agency to prove were allowable. We use that to walk through Sections 407 through 411. What You'll Learn: 407, prior written approval: Having money in a budget category doesn't mean you have authority to move it. Get approval in writing before you spend, not verbally.408, cost limitations: A federal statute can cap what the award will pay even if you spent more. What you spend and what the award reimburses aren't always the same number.409, special considerations: Direct versus indirect looks different by entity type, and it's why the $1.5 million was in question, the nonprofit couldn't show payroll costs were properly tied to the grant without solid time-and-effort documentation.410, unallowable costs: The section behind the $45,000 finding, once a cost is unallowable, it must be resolved according to the agency's instructions, often a refund.411, indirect cost rate adjustments: If you credit a grant back for an unallowable direct cost, don't forget the indirect costs charged against it too, that's real money at your negotiated rate.Key Quote: "Documentation is not a clerical exercise. It could be the main thing that is going to make a cost allowable." Bottom line: know the rule, know the award, know the cost, document your decision, and check before you spend. Connect with Jasmine & Markanday Consulting: Instagram: @markandayconsulting LinkedIn: @markandayconsulting Website: www.markanday.consulting If you found this episode helpful, please subscribe, rate, and share it with your colleagues and network. Join us next time as we continue exploring important grants management topics. Got a question? Send it my way at hello@markanday.consulting, I'd be happy to help. Until next time, stay informed and stay compliant.

    Get It in Writing: Prior Approval, Cost Limits, and Unallowable Costs (200.407–200.411)
  2. Aug 26

    What Makes Up a Cost? Composition of Costs (200.402–200.406)

    In our last episode, I laid the groundwork by walking through 2 CFR 200, Sections 400 and 401, the policy guide and the application. This week I'm building on that foundation and getting into what I think is one of the most practical parts of Subpart E: composition of cost. We're covering Sections 402 through 406, and by the end of this episode you'll have a much clearer picture of how a cost actually gets built, not just whether it's allowable. Every dollar you charge to a federal award can be questioned unless you can prove it's approved, appropriate, necessary, reasonable, and reimbursable. That's the lens I use for this whole episode. What You'll Learn: The simplest formula in Subpart E: I break down Section 200.402: total cost equals direct costs plus applicable indirect costs, minus applicable credits. If it doesn't fit one of those categories, it doesn't belong in your award total. Why classification trips people up: Costs usually go wrong not because they're bad expenses, but because they're classified or calculated inconsistently. The allowability checklist in Section 200.403: Necessary, reasonable, consistent with award terms, consistent with your own policies, treated consistently as direct or indirect, GAAP-compliant, not double-charged, and documented. Miss one, and it's unallowable. What "reasonable" really means: I unpack the "prudent person" standard in Section 200.404 and why reasonableness is judged on what you knew at the time, not in hindsight. Allocable costs, explained simply: Section 200.405: a cost is allocable if it can be assigned to an award in proportion to the benefit received. I also cover why you can't shift costs between awards to fix a budget problem. Applicable credits and why they're so easy to miss: Section 200.406: discounts, rebates, refunds, and overpayment adjustments must be credited back to the award. Ignoring them is a common, avoidable compliance issue. How it all works as one package: These five sections aren't standalone, they work together to tell you how a cost is built, allowable, reasonable, allocated, and adjusted. Key Quote: "A cost is reasonable if it does not exceed what a prudent person would incur under the circumstances at the time the decision was made to incur that cost." Connect with Jasmine & Markanday Consulting: Instagram: ⁠@markandayconsulting⁠ LinkedIn: ⁠@markandayconsulting Website: www.markanday.consulting If you found this episode useful, please subscribe, rate, and share it with your colleagues and networks. Next episode, we're taking a deeper dive into Sections 200.407 and 200.408, where we get into prior approvals and cost limitations, the rules that shape what you can and cannot charge to your award. Until then, stay informed and stay compliant.

    What Makes Up a Cost? Composition of Costs (200.402–200.406)
  3. Aug 12

    Setting the Ground Rules - Policy Guide & Application (200.400–200.401)

    Welcome to Season 3 of Grants Management Experts! In this kickoff episode, I'm introducing the Uniform Guidance Subpart E, Cost Principles, starting with the foundational sections 200.400 (Policy Guide) and 200.401 (Application). These two sections are your compliance baseline, and they dictate exactly how you can and cannot spend your grant money. I'm breaking down who's actually responsible for grant administration, why consistency is the golden thread running through compliance, and why documentation can make or break whether a cost is deemed allowable. What You'll Learn Why Sections 200.400 and 401 matter: I explain how these sections establish accountability and provide the framework for applying cost principles and how they apply to every organization receiving federal funds, not just grant managers. Who's really responsible: I make the case that managing a federal grant is not the responsibility of the federal agency or your auditor, it sits with your organization, and specifically with your organization's leadership, through a fiduciary duty that runs top to bottom. Sound management practices: I walk through why recipients and subrecipients must adhere to laws, regulations, and award terms, and must keep grant funds and organizational funds consistently and well documented. Students as trainees and employees: I cover how, for research awards, students supporting the work may be classified as trainees or employees depending on the role they perform and why that dual role must be recognized. No profit from federal grants: I explain that unless the award terms explicitly allow it, unspent funds on a fixed award (like $10,000 left over from a $50,000 award) must be returned to the federal agency, not kept as profit. Direct vs. indirect costs: I talk through why every organization is different, what's a direct cost for one organization may be indirect for another and how the Uniform Guidance gives me room for management judgment, as long as that judgment is reasonable, allowable, documented, and consistently applied. Application isn't one-size-fits-all: I break down how Section 200.401 acts as a gatekeeper, translating cost principles into practice based on your organization's nature, the specific grant's terms, and your own written policies and procedures. The golden rule of compliance: I share why consistency between your written policies, your actual practices, and your accounting records is what auditors look for and how it's often inconsistency, not just an unallowable cost, that leads to audit findings. Document, document, document: I remind you that "if it isn't documented, it didn't happen", and I take it one step further: if it's undocumented, it didn't happen, and the cost won't be believed as allowable. Key Quote "That responsibility of managing the grant does not sit with the federal agency... and it doesn't sit with your auditor. It sits with your organization and it really sits with your organization's leadership." Resources I Mentioned: 2 CFR 200, Subpart E - Cost Principles Section 200.400 (Policy Guide) Section 200.401 (Application) Connect with Jasmine & Markanday Consulting: Instagram: ⁠@markandayconsulting⁠ LinkedIn: ⁠@markandayconsulting Website: www.markanday.consulting If you found this episode helpful, please subscribe, rate, and share it with your colleagues. Join me next time as I continue exploring important grants management topics. Until then, stay informed and stay compliant. Register for my Free Upcoming Live Training on August 19th | Time: 1:00 - 2:00 PM CST | Grant Management Essentials: Avoiding Costly Compliance Mistakes Before Your Next Audit here!

    Setting the Ground Rules - Policy Guide & Application (200.400–200.401)
  4. Season 3 Trailer

    Trailer - Season 3 | Grants Management Experts

    We're back! Welcome to Season 3 of Grants Management Experts. This season, I'm digging into one of the topics that trips up even seasoned grant professionals: Subpart E, Cost Principles of 2 CFR Part 200. If you've ever second-guessed whether a cost is allowable, wondered how to split direct from indirect costs, or felt lost trying to figure out your indirect cost rate, this season is for you. Here's what I'm covering: What actually makes a cost allowable and reasonableThe real difference between direct and indirect costs (and why it matters more than you think)Indirect cost rates and how to recover more of what you're owedWhat documentation auditors actually want to seeI've spent over 20 years working with nonprofits as an accountant and consultant, and since 2014 I've helped organizations negotiate indirect cost rates that have brought in an estimated $500,000+ in additional revenue. So this isn't theory, it's the stuff I deal with in real client work every day, and I'm excited to bring it to you. To me, grants management isn't just about staying compliant. Done right, it's how we protect our funding, build trust with our funders, and make sure every dollar actually goes toward the mission. I've got new episodes dropping throughout the season, so subscribe so you don't miss one. And if there's a topic or question you want me to cover, send it my way, I'd love to hear from you. Connect with Jasmine & Markanday Consulting: Instagram: ⁠@markandayconsulting⁠LinkedIn: ⁠@markandayconsultingWebsite: www.markanday.consulting

    Trailer - Season 3 | Grants Management Experts
  5. 10/08/2025

    Ep.8 - From Suspension to Termination: The Realities of Grant Noncompliance

    In this season finale of Grants Management Experts, Jasmine Markanday wraps up Season 2 with one of the most crucial and often daunting areas of federal grant management: when things go wrong in federal grants. Under 2 CFR 200.339–343, Jasmine explains the federal remedies available when a recipient or subrecipient fails to comply with grant requirements from temporary suspensions to full terminations and how you can protect your organization through proactive compliance, strong internal controls, and effective communication. What You’ll Learn in This Episode  The consequences of non-compliance: How federal agencies can withhold payments, disallow costs, or suspend/terminate awardsThe impact of termination listings in SAM.gov and how it affects future funding opportunities Understanding termination: The three ways termination can occur: by the agency, mutual consent, or by the recipientWhat a termination notice must include reasons, effective dates, and scopeWhy transparency and procedural fairness (2 CFR 200.341–.342) matter in the appeals process The financial impact: What happens to costs incurred during suspension or termination (hint: most are unallowable)The two limited exceptions that may apply How suspension or termination halts your ability to charge costs to the award How to protect your organization:  Strengthening internal controls and training staffDocumenting compliance, communication, and corrective actionsUnderstanding your right to object, appeal, and provide evidence before termination decisions are finalKey Takeaways Know the risks: Non-compliance can lead to more than disallowed costs; it can result in termination, SAM.gov reporting for five years, and future funding loss.Act quickly: If you receive a notice, respond immediately and explore corrective actions.Prevention is everything: Strong internal controls, policies, and staff training are your best defense.Resources & Links 2 CFR 200.339–343: Remedies for Non- ComplianceLearn more at markanday.consultingConnect with Us Instagram: @markandayconsultingLinkedIn: @markandayconsultingIf this episode was helpful, please share it with your colleagues and leave a review to help other grant professionals find the show. That’s a wrap for Season 2! Join Jasmine next season as she continues unpacking practical insights, compliance strategies, and expert guidance to help you stay informed and stay compliant. Quote to Remember: “Grants management isn’t just about going after the money, it's about protecting your organization, the communities you serve, and the trust they’ve placed in you.” - Jasmine Markanday

    Ep.8 - From Suspension to Termination: The Realities of Grant Noncompliance
  6. 09/25/2025

    Ep. 7 - From Micro-Purchases to Formal Solicitations: 2 CFR 200 Procurement Standards

    In this episode of Grants Management Experts, Jasmine dives into one of the most practical — and often misunderstood — areas of federal grant management: procurement standards under 2 CFR 200.320. Whether you’re a recipient, subrecipient, or grants professional supporting compliance, understanding procurement methods is critical for both cost allowability and audit readiness. What You’ll Learn in This Episode The three procurement methods: Informal (micro-purchases & simplified acquisitions)Formal (sealed bids & proposals)Non-competitive (sole source under limited circumstances)Key thresholds you must know: Micro-purchase threshold: $10,000, increasing to $15,000 on October 1, 2025Simplified acquisition threshold: $250,000, rising to $350,000 in October 1, 2025Self-certification option to raise micro-purchase thresholds up to $50,000 — and the conditions requiredHow to apply each method: When micro-purchases are appropriate and how to document price reasonablenessConditions for sealed bids versus proposals under the formal methodSituations where sole sourcing is allowed — and the documentation requiredSpecial considerations: Procurement of architectural and engineering services through qualifications-based selectionState, local, or tribal rules that may further limit thresholdsThe importance of self-certification and internal risk assessments Key Takeaways Always align procurement decisions with written procedures that match both federal rules and your organization’s policies. Documentation is everything: from price reasonableness to risk assessments and self-certifications. Understand thresholds now — and prepare for the upcoming October 2025 changes. Remember: in grants management, fairness, competition, and compliance are the foundations of procurement. Resources & Links: 2 CFR 200 Procurement Standards Learn more at markanday.consulting Connect with Us: Instagram: @markandayconsulting LinkedIn: @markandayconsulting If this episode was helpful, please share it with your colleagues and leave a review to help other grants professionals find the show. Stay tuned for next week’s SEASON FINALE episode, where Jasmine will continue breaking down essential compliance topics in federal grants management. Quote to Remember: “As a grant professional, it is your job to help your organization find the right method, apply it consistently, and document, document, document” — Jasmine Markanday

    Ep. 7 - From Micro-Purchases to Formal Solicitations: 2 CFR 200 Procurement Standards
  7. 09/10/2025

    Ep. 6 - Drawing the Line: Understanding Direct Costs in Federal Grants

    In this episode of Grants Management Experts, Jasmine Markanday breaks down one of the most critical concepts in federal grant compliance: direct costs. Guided by 2 CFR 200.413, Jasmine explains what qualifies as a direct cost, when certain costs can shift from indirect to direct, and why consistency is the cornerstone of compliance. From administrative staff salaries to minor purchases, unallowable costs, and nonprofit-specific considerations, this episode equips you with the clarity to correctly classify expenses and avoid compliance pitfalls. Whether you’re writing a grant budget or managing one post-award, this deep dive will help you protect your organization’s resources and credibility. What You’ll Learn: The definition of direct costs under 2 CFR 200.413 and how they differ from indirect costs. Key questions to ask when deciding if an expense is a direct cost. Special conditions for charging administrative and clerical salaries directly. How to handle minor items and apply consistent treatment. The role of unallowable costs in calculating indirect cost rates. Nonprofit-specific rules for member and client service activities. Key Takeaways: A cost is direct if it can be specifically tied to a grant’s objectives with accuracy. Consistency is non-negotiable—similar costs must be treated the same way across funding sources. Some typically indirect expenses (like cybersecurity upgrades) can be charged directly if they clearly support one grant. Administrative salaries may only be charged directly if they meet all three CFR conditions. Unallowable costs, while not chargeable, must still be included in the direct cost base for rate calculations. Pro Tip:Train your staff on cost classification policies—misclassification can lead to audit findings, repayment of funds, and loss of credibility. Connect with Us: Instagram: @markandayconsulting LinkedIn: @markandayconsulting Enjoyed this episode? Leave a review, subscribe, and share it with your grants team! Quote to Remember: “Direct costs aren’t just about accuracy—they’re about fairness to your organization, your funders, and the federal government.” — Jasmine Markanday

    Ep. 6 - Drawing the Line: Understanding Direct Costs in Federal Grants
  8. 09/10/2025

    Ep. 6 - Drawing the Line: Understanding Direct Costs in Federal Grants

    In this episode of Grants Management Experts, Jasmine Markanday breaks down one of the most critical concepts in federal grant compliance: direct costs. Guided by 2 CFR 200.413, Jasmine explains what qualifies as a direct cost, when certain costs can shift from indirect to direct, and why consistency is the cornerstone of compliance. From administrative staff salaries to minor purchases, unallowable costs, and nonprofit-specific considerations, this episode equips you with the clarity to correctly classify expenses and avoid compliance pitfalls. Whether you’re writing a grant budget or managing one post-award, this deep dive will help you protect your organization’s resources and credibility. What You’ll Learn: The definition of direct costs under 2 CFR 200.413 and how they differ from indirect costs. Key questions to ask when deciding if an expense is a direct cost. Special conditions for charging administrative and clerical salaries directly. How to handle minor items and apply consistent treatment. The role of unallowable costs in calculating indirect cost rates. Nonprofit-specific rules for member and client service activities. Key Takeaways: A cost is direct if it can be specifically tied to a grant’s objectives with accuracy. Consistency is non-negotiable—similar costs must be treated the same way across funding sources. Some typically indirect expenses (like cybersecurity upgrades) can be charged directly if they clearly support one grant. Administrative salaries may only be charged directly if they meet all three CFR conditions. Unallowable costs, while not chargeable, must still be included in the direct cost base for rate calculations. Pro Tip:Train your staff on cost classification policies—misclassification can lead to audit findings, repayment of funds, and loss of credibility. Connect with Us: Instagram: @markandayconsulting LinkedIn: @markandayconsulting Enjoyed this episode? Leave a review, subscribe, and share it with your grants team! Quote to Remember: “Direct costs aren’t just about accuracy—they’re about fairness to your organization, your funders, and the federal government.” — Jasmine Markanday

    Ep. 6 - Drawing the Line: Understanding Direct Costs in Federal Grants

Trailers

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
5 Ratings

About

If you're looking to excel in grant management and maximize your grant funds' potential, then you should definitely check out Jasmine Markanday's podcast. In the Grants Management Expert Podcast, Jasmine shares her insights and expertise on various aspects of grant management, including tips, tricks, and best practices. Tune in to learn how to navigate the world of grants management and take your grant funding to new heights.