Gray Matters

The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State
  • 5.0(16개의 평가)
  • 정부
  • 월 2회 업데이트

The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State, at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School, supports research and debate on the modern administrative state, and the constitutional issues surrounding it. In this podcast, we’ll discuss some of the questions being debated around modern administration — some new questions, some timeless ones. And you can also get the audio from Gray Center events. Listen to all episodes of Gray Matters at Ricochet.com.

  1. 2월 5일

    Reeve Bull on Achieving Regulatory Reform in Virginia

    Jace Lington chats with Reeve Bull about his experiences running Virginia’s Office of Regulatory Management. Bull discusses Virginia's recent regulatory reform efforts, highlighting the successful streamlining of regulations and the significant savings achieved. He emphasizes the importance of transparency in the permitting process and the need to balance regulation with economic growth. Bull addresses criticisms of deregulation, particularly concerning health and safety, and explains how Virginia's approach has focused on maintaining essential protections while reducing unnecessary burdens. The conversation also explores the integration of AI in regulatory processes and the importance of considering the impacts on local governments and small businesses. Notes: The Virginia Model: How the Commonwealth Build a Best-In-Class Regulatory System, Reeve T. Bull and Patrick A. McLaughlin  Virginia’s New Approach to Regulatory Analysis, 2023 Gray Matters Episode with Andrew Wheeler and Reeve Bull

    1시간 9분

  2. 1월 20일

    Ronald J. Pestritto on Government by the Unelected

    Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Hillsdale College Professor Ronald J. Pestritto about his recent article tracing the rise of the administrative state and the revolution it wrought in the federal government. Pestritto explores the evolution of the administrative state, tracing its roots back to the Progressive Era and the shift from a government based on consent to one grounded in expertise. He argues that this transformation has led to a significant disconnect between elected officials and the bureaucratic agencies that wield substantial power without direct accountability to the electorate. The conversation delves into the implications of this shift, particularly in the context of the Trump administration's attempts to rein in the administrative state and the ongoing debates surrounding judicial oversight and legislative responsibility. Notes: Government By the Unelected: How It Happened, and How It Might Be Tamed, Ronald J. Pestritto The Original Progressives Are No Guide for Today's Conservatives, Ronald J. Pestritto

    1시간 13분

  3. 1월 7일

    Jeffrey Pojanowski on the "Faces of Formalism"

    Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Notre Dame Law Professor Jeffery Pojanowski about his forthcoming paper, “Faces of Formalism.” The paper explores the complexities of formalism in legal interpretation, discussing its two faces: authority and method. They delve into concrete examples, such as Gorsuch's application of textualism in the Bostock case, and examine the tensions that arise between these two aspects. Pojanowski offers some ideas about how to look for authoritative answers while respecting rules meant to limit judicial discretion. Notes: Faces of Formalism, Jefferey PojanowskiNeoclassical Administrative Law, Jeffrey Pojanowski

    46분

  4. 2025. 12. 18.

    The Gray Center's 2025 Year in Review

    Adam White, Jace Lington, and Bennett Nuss reflect on the significant regulatory developments of 2025, focusing on under-reported stories in the administrative state. They discuss the future of the Federal Reserve, the evolving relationships between public and private entities, the impact of repealing disparate impact laws, and the diminishing role of Congress. Notes: Trump Regulatory Policy: 2025 Compendium, Bridget C.E. Dooling, Notice & Comment BlogThe Brave New World of Administrative Law, Adam White and Bennett Nuss, 2024 A Hard Look Podcast

    1시간 11분

  5. 2025. 11. 27.

    Eli Nachmany on the Stare Decisis Effects of Loper Bright 1

    Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss discuss the implications of the Loper Bright decision on administrative law with guest Eli Nachmany. Eli’s forthcoming paper, “Deference Undisturbed,” examines the effects of theLoper Bright decision on prior cases decided under the Chevron framework. They discuss the open legal questions that remain after the end of Chevron, the role of Congress in shaping administrative law, and the future of various deference doctrines.   Notes: Vacatur as Complete Relief, Eli Nachmany, Cato Supreme Court Review  Chevron Deference Was Fun While It Lasted, Eugene Scalia, Wall Street Journal

    58분

  6. 2025. 11. 21.

    Tanner Jones on How Vulcan Technologies Uses AI to Revolutionize Regulation

    Jace Lington chats with Vulcan Technologies CEO Tanner Jones about how his company uses AI to help agencies, lawmakers, and businesses navigate the complex world of administrative law. They discuss whether AI systems will replace the industry and government consultants who usually guide people through the layers of law, regulation, and court precedent that affect our world.  Notes: Vulcan Technologies Website Restoring Legislative Authority: A Balanced Approach to Agency Deference, Jonathan Wolfson and Tanner Jones Deference article

    22분

  7. 2025. 11. 03.

    John Vecchione on What the Constitution Says About Presidents and Tariffs

    Bennett Nuss chats with New Civil Liberties Alliance Senior Litigation Counsel John Vecchione about the tariff case pending before the Supreme Court, Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump. They discuss the main arguments about the extent of the president’s power over tariff policy and what the court might decide. Notes: Trump’s tariffs are unconstitutional—we’re suing to end them, John J. Vecchione and Andrew J. Morris NCLA’s amicus brief in the Learning Resources case President Donald Trump’s reply brief in the Learning Resources case Prof. Chad Squitieri’s amicus brief in the Learning Resources case Prof. Aditya Bamzai’s amicus brief in the Learning Resources case Adam White at SCOTUSblog on the Learning Resources case

    44분

  8. 2025. 10. 10.

    Christopher J. Walker on Congress and the Shifting Sands in Administrative Law

    Jace Lington chats with University of Michigan Law Professor Christopher J. Walker about how to reinvigorate Congress in light of the changing administrative law landscape. They discuss his recent article, Congress and the Shifting Sands in Administrative Law, and his ideas about how Congress can play a larger role in federal policymaking. Notes: Congress and the Shifting Sands in Administrative Law, Christopher J. Walker Delegation and Time, Jonathan H. Adler & Christopher J. Walker Congress’s Anti-Removal Power, Aaron L. Nielson & Christopher J. Walker Post-Chevron Working Group Report, Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-MO)

    43분
모두 보기(157개)

평가 및 리뷰

5
최고 5점
16개의 평가

소개

The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State, at George Mason University’s Antonin Scalia Law School, supports research and debate on the modern administrative state, and the constitutional issues surrounding it. In this podcast, we’ll discuss some of the questions being debated around modern administration — some new questions, some timeless ones. And you can also get the audio from Gray Center events. Listen to all episodes of Gray Matters at Ricochet.com.

정보

  • 제작진
    The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State
  • 방송 연도
    2019년 - 2026년
  • 에피소드
    157
  • 등급
    전체 연령 사용가
  • 저작권
    © The C. Boyden Gray Center for the Administrative State
  • 웹사이트 보기
    Gray Matters

좋아할 만한 다른 항목