GUTTER STUDIES

Tom

This is the audio feed for Gutter Studies: a video-essay project exploring the pleasure, history, and meaning of low cinema. gutterstudies.substack.com

  1. Jun 1

    Hellraiser Bloodline: The Refuge of Fantasy

    We’ve arrived at the final chapter of Sweet Sweet Suffering ! I’ve long had a soft spot for Hellraiser: Bloodline. It features my favorite cenobite, Angelique, and has always struck me as the franchise at its most narratively ambitious. To this day, Hellraiser: Bloodline has a reputation problem. Pinhead in space, a troubled production, a director who took his name off the film. Critics and fans wrote it off at the time, and it’s been unfairly dismissed ever since. But viewed carefully — and through the lens of Lacanian psychoanalysis we’ve been using — Bloodline is hugely interesting, in my view, actually completes what the first two films started. Because once you understand the paradox of desire, and once you’ve descended into the system that produces it, a final question naturally follows. If desire can never truly be satisfied, and if the Real underneath it would annihilate us, how do we live with desire at all? The answer, according to Lacan, is fantasy. Not fantasy in the casual sense, but fantasy as a psychological structure: the fragile screen that gives desire a shape, shields us from the traumatic Real behind it, and allows us to keep going, to keep wanting, to keep living. In Bloodline, this idea takes the form of a type of cenobite we haven’t seen before: Angelique. This video concludes the philosophical arc that runs across three Hellraiser films. I’ve been a lifelong fan of these films, and even before I started Gutter Studies I always wanted to sit down and figure out what the series meant to me. These three videos are it. I hope these essays have contributed to your own enjoyment and understanding of these movies, some of the most distinctive and fascinating in all of horror history. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit gutterstudies.substack.com/subscribe

    Hellraiser Bloodline: The Refuge of Fantasy
  2. May 4

    Hellraiser: The Paradox of Desire

    Welcome to Sweet Sweet Suffering: A Three-Part Video Essay on Hellraiser! In part one, I argue Hellraiser is not about demons. It's about desire, and best understood as mapping to a specific theory of desire from Jacques Lacan, one of the twentieth century’s most provocative and influential thinkers. Over three video essays, I'll go deep into the Hellraiser franchise — not just as horror films, but as a surprisingly coherent philosophical argument about what it means to be a human being. Each part focuses on a different entry (parts 1, 2, and 4). (I skip Hell on Earth because I don’t have anything interesting to say about that one.) In my reading, Hellraiser, Hellbound, and Bloodline each elaborates its own Lacanian concept. Hellraiser is about desire.Hellbound is about the Real.Bloodline is about the role of fantasy. The first talks about desire as a certain paradox: what happens when you actually get what you want? The second descends into the psychological system that produces desire. The third reveals the fragile illusion that allows us to live with desire at all. The framework is Lacanian psychoanalysis — one of the twentieth century's most challenging and rewarding bodies of thought. But no prior knowledge required. If you love Hellraiser and want to go deeper, this is for you. And if you've always been curious about Lacan but didn't know where to start, it turns out Hellraiser is a fantastic entry point. 🧠 Takes this as an opportunity to revisit one of the most interesting horror films of all time. Part two, covering Hellbound, drops in two weeks. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit gutterstudies.substack.com/subscribe

    Hellraiser: The Paradox of Desire
  3. 11/04/2025

    His Pain, Her Performance

    This is part two of a video series analyzing Carol J. Clover’s Men, Women, and Chainsaws: Gender in the Modern Horror Film. You can catch up on part one here, or you can jump right into this one. Part one focused on Clover’s classic reading of the slasher film and her coining of the term Final Girl. Part two explores so-called “occult horror,” which includes ghosts, demonic possession, black magic, and the like. Clover’s take on occult horror is a useful complement to her analysis of slasher films, exploring the way male-driven arcs reflect the same underlying tendency we see in the female-driven spectacle of slasher films. These two currents defined horror movies in the 1970s and 80s, and Clover argues that both draw on the same underlying anxiety: an unconscious fear the two sexes are one. 0:00 - introduction 1:45 - Don’t Look Now (dir. Nicolas Roeg 1973) 2:32 - white science and black magic 3:27 - the too-open female vs. the too-closed male 4:40 - sex in slasher films vs. reproduction in occult horror films 5:54 - The Exorcist (dir. William Friedkin 1973) 7:20 - Witchboard (dir. Kevin Tenney 1986) 9:44 - Possession (dir. Andrzej Żuławski 1981) 10:40 - summary and critique of Carol Clover’s analysis 14:08 - conclusion - slashers compared I started this project a while back now, and do plan on finishing it out with two more installments. For a change of pace, the next installment will focus on Clover’s chapter on rape revenge films. You can expect a content warning! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit gutterstudies.substack.com/subscribe

    His Pain, Her Performance

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
2 Ratings

About

This is the audio feed for Gutter Studies: a video-essay project exploring the pleasure, history, and meaning of low cinema. gutterstudies.substack.com