I Have Some Questions...

Erik Berglund
  • 5.0 (42)
  • Management
  • Updated Daily

Most people know the headline of a leader’s story. Few know the path it took to get there. This podcast goes beyond titles, book launches and business wins, to explore the lived journey behind the thought leader. Through deep, unhurried conversations, we uncover the moments that shaped them—the doubts, pivots, convictions, and quiet breakthroughs that built their body of work. Each episode features authors, coaches, executives, and bold thinkers who have forged their own path. Instead of rehearsed talking points, they’re invited into a space where thoughtful questions unlock something more human. The result is a layered conversation that reveals not just what they preach, but how they became the kind of person who can teach it.Because we believe the best stories aren’t always told—they’re revealed. And when brilliant people are given the right questions and the room to answer them fully, what emerges is insight you can feel, frameworks you can apply, and a deeper understanding of what it truly takes to lead, create, and contribute at a meaningful level. 

  1. 188: "Why Do We Feel Guilty Taking Rest Even When We Deserve It?" ft. Alli Murphy

    1d ago

    188: "Why Do We Feel Guilty Taking Rest Even When We Deserve It?" ft. Alli Murphy

    Erik and Alli get real about a form of guilt that shows up for high performers and solopreneurs: not only guilt about resting, but guilt about “adulting” not being productive too. They unpack why it happens, what “rest” actually means, and practical ways to give yourself permission without needing it to be earned first. 🧭 Conversation Highlights Erik shares how, for him, taking time off can feel irresponsible because his livelihood depends on output, not just because work is demanding.Alli describes how guilt can attach to many non-work activities too, from laundry and meal prep to painting, reading, and even choosing to watch Netflix.They explore the idea of “permission” and how high achiever brains treat rest like something you must earn, not something you’re allowed to schedule.They land on practical experiments and language for rest, including naming an “operation off duty” block and matching rest types (social, physical, mental, sensory, creative, emotional, spiritual) 💡 Key Takeaways Guilt around rest is often less about the task itself and more about the story your brain tells you about earning it.Rest is not one thing, and it helps to identify which type (social, sensory, creative, spiritual, etc.) actually recharges you rather than what merely feels like avoidance.If rest feels “lazy,” run it like an experiment: do it on purpose, notice what it does to your energy and creativity afterward.Sometimes the barrier is performance anxiety plus cultural conditioning about always being productive, not a lack of willpower.❓ Questions That Mattered What story am I telling myself that makes rest feel like irresponsibility?Where does my guilt show up outside of work, like with chores or leisure?What kind of rest am I actually needing right now (not just what feels like the least productive option)?Is this activity genuinely restorative, or is it dopamine fulfillment that I’m mixing up with recovery?🗣️ Notable Quotes “We spend a lot of time talking about clients’ struggles, and I’ll be honest, this is something I struggle with.”“We are not the same person… Netflix is a very different category than reading or painting to her.”“Experiment with it… Do the rest, and notice how you feel afterwards.”🔗 Links & Resources Watch ‘Lazy: A Manifesto’ on YouTubeListen To Other Episodes Co-Hosted With Alli

    19 min

  2. 4d ago

    186: "What Are the Real Reasons Healthcare Workers Leave? (reflections on Christopher Sund)

    🧠 Erik’s Take After his conversation with Christopher Sund, Erik walked away thinking less about healthcare staffing—and more about systems. The healthcare industry is being squeezed from both sides at once: an aging population needs more care every year, while fewer people are entering the profession and more experienced workers are leaving it behind. That tension alone would be difficult enough, but layered on top are broken systems, growing bureaucracy, and environments that slowly disconnect caregivers from the reason they entered the field in the first place. What stood out most to Erik wasn’t just the scale of the staffing crisis. It was the humanity Chris brought to the conversation. Behind every “staffing shortage” is a person trying to balance meaningful work, exhaustion, family, purpose, and the emotional weight of caring for others. 🎯 Top Insights from the Interview Healthcare workers often leave because the systems surrounding care become overwhelming—not because they stop caring about people. AI and technology may remove friction, but they can also unintentionally push institutions to demand even more output. Great recruiters aren’t simply filling jobs—they’re helping shape some of the most important decisions people make in their lives. The future of healthcare may depend less on working harder and more on building systems that allow caregivers to stay human. 🧩 The Personal Layer One part of the conversation hit especially close to home for Erik: watching his wife leave healthcare despite deeply loving the work itself. Like many caregivers, she entered medicine because she wanted to help people. But over time, the increasing demands, bureaucracy, and lifestyle pressures made the work unsustainable for that season of life. That reality reframed the issue for Erik. The problem isn’t a lack of compassionate people. The problem is often the environment they’re being asked to survive inside. 🧰 From Insight to Action Look closely at whether your systems are helping people succeed—or slowly burning them out. Don’t confuse efficiency with effectiveness. Faster isn’t always better. If you lead people, remember that human connection is rarely replaceable. The best organizations build systems that support both performance and humanity. 🗣️ Notable Quotes “It’s very rare for somebody to leave healthcare because they don’t like helping people.” “You don’t really get to take care of people anymore. You become a factory of visits.” “A recruiter is helping someone make one of the biggest decisions of their life.” 🔗 Links & Resources Listen to Christopher Sund's Episode

    9 min

  3. 4d ago

    187: "When Did Trust Between Patients and Physicians Begin to Break Down?" (reflections on Cameron Sabet)

    🧠 Erik’s Take Erik reflects on his conversation with Cameron Sabet—a 24-year-old medical student, researcher, venture capitalist, policy advisor, and entrepreneur whose ability to operate across multiple disciplines left a lasting impression. What stood out most wasn’t simply Cameron’s résumé or productivity. It was his intellectual flexibility. Throughout the conversation, Cameron repeatedly demonstrated the ability to hold competing truths simultaneously without collapsing into simplistic conclusions. That ability led Erik into deeper reflection around healthcare, institutional trust, capitalism, responsibility, and the increasingly fragmented nature of modern society. 🎯 Top Insights from the Interview The Healthcare System Is Suffering From a Trust Breakdown One of the biggest themes Erik pulled from the conversation was the growing erosion of trust between patients and physicians. Healthcare systems increasingly push physicians toward efficiency and volume, while patients simultaneously have access to endless streams of online information—both accurate and inaccurate. The result is a relationship that feels strained on both sides. Erik reflects on the idea that the physician-patient relationship itself may still be the most important ingredient in healthcare, but modern systems leave less and less room for trust to actually develop. Patients Also Carry Responsibility in the Trust Crisis A major realization for Erik was that responsibility doesn’t sit solely with institutions. Patients now allow journalists, influencers, social media algorithms, Substack writers, and content creators to occupy roles that physicians once held more exclusively. That doesn’t mean institutions deserve blind trust. But it does mean individuals carry responsibility for whom they allow to shape their worldview and healthcare decisions. Cameron’s Ability to Hold Multiple Truths Simultaneously One of Erik’s biggest takeaways was Cameron’s unusual ability to explore competing ideas without collapsing into ideological rigidity. 🧩 The Personal Layer What fascinated Erik most about Cameron wasn’t simply achievement. It was the combination of ambition, humility, curiosity, and openness. Despite operating at an unusually high level across medicine, business, journalism, and policy, Cameron consistently approached difficult topics with nuance rather than certainty. That left Erik reflecting on how rare it is to encounter someone who can simultaneously: Hold strong beliefsRemain intellectually curiousExplore opposing perspectivesStay grounded and human throughout the conversation🧰 From Insight to Action Pay attention to where institutional trust is breaking down in your own lifeBe intentional about whom you allow to shape your worldviewResist the urge to collapse complex issues into simplistic conclusionsPractice holding competing truths without immediately needing resolutionCreate more room for curiosity, nuance, and intellectual humility in difficult conversations🗣️ Notable Quotes “The institution of medicine is not aligned with the same set of incentives that the patient needs them to be.” “We have a responsibility for whom we choose to trust.” “Multiple things can be true at once.” “The system probably won’t fix itself.” “There’s phenomenal perspective and wisdom from a polymath 24-year-old that comes across in the most human way possible.” 🔗 Links & Resources Listen to Cameron Sabet's Episode

    11 min
  4. 185: Cameron Sabet: "The Real Breakdown Happening Inside Healthcare"

    5d ago

    185: Cameron Sabet: "The Real Breakdown Happening Inside Healthcare"

    Cameron Sabet operates at the intersection of medicine, venture capital, journalism, policy, and global public health—and somehow manages to connect all of them into one coherent worldview. In this conversation, Erik and Cameron explore the collapse of trust in healthcare, the unintended consequences of technology and social media, the loneliness epidemic, venture capital’s role in shaping human progress, and why human connection still sits at the center of medicine. They also dive into the future of AI in healthcare, the economics driving modern hospital systems, antimicrobial resistance, and what it actually takes to lead across multiple high-performance environments without burning out. 👤 About the Guest Cameron Sabet is an award-winning researcher working at the intersection of surgical outcomes, health policy, and medical data science. His work has been cited more than 10,000 times across over 100 peer-reviewed publications, including publications in Nature, JAMA, The Lancet and The BMJ. He is a senior collaborator on the IHME Global Burden of Disease Initiative, serves as Chief Strategy Officer for surgical AI company CardioVis, advises startups and policymakers, and hosts the leadership podcast Cutting to the Case, featuring notable guests such as Mark Cuban, the CEOs of Kaiser Permanente and Humana, and multiple United States Ambassadors. At just 23 years old, Cameron is also finishing medical school at Georgetown University. 🧭 Conversation Highlights Why Cameron Rejects the Idea of a Single “North Star”. Cameron explains why he intentionally operates across multiple fields rather than committing his identity to one singular mission. For him, medicine, policy, journalism, and venture capital all strengthen one another. The conversation explores the growing collapse of trust between patients, physicians, insurers, and healthcare institutions. The result is a system where human connection is being compressed by economics and scale. Why Psychiatry May Survive the AI Shift Better Than Other Fields. Cameron believes many healthcare systems will use AI to increase physician volume rather than improve patient care. But psychiatry may be different. 💡 Key Takeaways Leadership across multiple domains requires systems, delegation, and trust—not superhuman productivityThe healthcare system’s trust crisis is deeply tied to misaligned incentives and loss of autonomyAI may improve healthcare administration, but human connection remains irreplaceable in fields like psychiatryVenture capital doesn’t just fund businesses—it shapes the future of human progress❓ Questions That Mattered What happens when physicians lose the time necessary to build trust with patients?Can healthcare systems ever fully align patient outcomes with financial incentives?What role should physicians play in journalism and public communication?Are we becoming culturally fragmented beyond repair?What does meaningful human connection look like in an algorithm-driven world?🗣️ Notable Quotes “As soon as you don’t share the wealth, you lose the magic of compound effort.” “A lot of policymakers are writing healthcare legislation without physician input.” “You have to sit with the patient. If you don’t sit with the patient for a long period of time, they won’t give you the information.” “People are so entrenched in their own frameworks for dissecting reality.” 🔗 Links & Resources Follow Cameron on LinkedInCheck out Cameron's Website: www.cameronsabet.com

    1h 27m
  5. 184: Christopher Sund: "Is Healthcare Staffing Broken Beyond Repair?"

    6d ago

    184: Christopher Sund: "Is Healthcare Staffing Broken Beyond Repair?"

    Erik sits down with healthcare staffing leader Christopher Sund for a wide-ranging conversation about the future of healthcare, hiring, leadership, and AI. From staffing shortages and burnout to interviewing, recruiting, and organizational culture, Chris shares what he’s seeing firsthand from hospitals and healthcare systems across the country. The conversation explores why healthcare staffing challenges are bigger than most people realize, why great recruiters are really great listeners, and why technology may never replace the human side of care. They also dive into leadership, accountability, interviewing mistakes, and what actually makes someone a great fit inside an organization. 👤 About the Guest Christopher Sund is the President and COO of Uniti Med and GQR Healthcare, a Maxwell Leadership Certified Speaker and Coach, and founder of Amplify Speakers. His work focuses on healthcare staffing, leadership, organizational growth, and helping companies build stronger teams and cultures. 🧭 Conversation Highlights Why America’s healthcare staffing shortage is becoming a long-term structural problem The hidden challenges rural hospitals face when recruiting specialized talent How AI is helping healthcare workers reduce friction without replacing human care Why great recruiters need emotional intelligence—not just sales skills The biggest mistakes organizations make when interviewing candidates Why most companies aren’t actually recruiting—they’re just posting jobs How better hiring systems can improve retention and culture Why empathy alone isn’t enough to make someone an effective leader 💡 Key Takeaways Healthcare demand is rising faster than the workforce can support. Burnout is often caused more by broken systems than by patients themselves. Technology can improve efficiency, but people still want human connection. Great interviewing is about uncovering traits—not just reviewing experience. The best recruiters help people move toward growth and fulfillment. Strong leadership requires balancing empathy with accountability. 🗣️ Notable Quotes “The best medicine can just be an employee making another person feel seen.” — Christopher Sund “A recruiter is helping someone make one of the biggest decisions of their life.” — Erik Berglund “Most healthcare needs aren’t going away. If anything, they’re growing exponentially.” — Christopher Sund “People leave when they stop feeling like they’re moving forward.” — Christopher Sund 🔗 Links & Resources Follow Christopher Sund on LinkedInCheck out Uniti Med, one of Chris' companies: unitimed.com

    1h 3m
  6. 183: "Kids Are Intuitively Hacking AI With Their Voice, Not Their Keyboard" ft. Justin Coats

    Jun 23

    183: "Kids Are Intuitively Hacking AI With Their Voice, Not Their Keyboard" ft. Justin Coats

    Erik shares how he’s running a week-one “vibe coding” summer curriculum for his 10- and 7-year-old daughters using voice-first ChatGPT. He and Justin unpack what’s working, what friction to watch for, and how to think about learning, iteration, and human responsibility as AI becomes the new interface. 🧭 Conversation Highlights Erik’s kids start with voice prompts to generate images, then turn them into stories and comic panels. When they hit “out of ideas,” they switch to a question-driven loop.Justin connects voice interaction to a future where typing may matter less, especially compared to the speed and friction adults experience when typing vs speaking.Erik explains how he designed the curriculum to teach creativity in steps: character ideas, then world-building and story arcs, then tools like Scratch.They debate “creation” and responsibility: Erik pushes that he created the curriculum using a tool, while Justin emphasizes co-creation language and the need to define responsibility clearly.💡 Key Takeaways Voice-first prompting reduced friction and boosted creative iteration for kids, without requiring typing skills as a constraint.A curriculum that gives kids a narrative “vehicle” (character, world, arc) is more effective than letting them only “play” with the tool.Guardrails matter: AI should support thinking, questions, and drafts, but kids still need to physically do the writing to keep the skill building.Ownership and responsibility should stay human-centered until AI can be held accountable for outcomes, not just outputs.❓ Questions That Mattered What’s the right sequence for teaching kids creativity with AI tools so they don’t stall out at “what do I make?”How should adults think about the shift from typing to speaking as the primary interface with AI?Where do we draw the line between using AI as a thinking partner versus outsourcing the actual work (like story writing)?When AI helps generate curriculum or content, what does “created by” actually mean, and who is responsible for downstream impact?🗣️ Notable Quotes “There’s no wrong answers, there’s no test. It’s just… I come up with an idea, I see it.”“If you create your digital baby, you didn’t do any of those things. It has to go do those things on its own.”“It really seems like creativity tends to be a function of speed.”“Until I can hold the AI responsible for something it created, I’m not confident I could use the language that it created something.”🔗 Links & Resources Listen To Other Episodes Co-Hosted With Justin

    53 min
  7. 182: "What is Being Hyper-Responsive Actually Costing You?" ft. Alli Murphy

    Jun 22

    182: "What is Being Hyper-Responsive Actually Costing You?" ft. Alli Murphy

    Erik and Alli dig into “invisible rules” that shape how we behave at work, especially the ones that reward constant availability and create anxiety. They compare examples from different cultures, then get practical about how to change the rules without triggering backlash, using shared wins and a trial mindset. 🧭 Conversation Highlights What starts as “being committed” at work often turns into guilt-based expectations like staying connected on vacation or responding immediately after hours.Some invisible rules are cultural, but many are reinforced by habits and performance anxiety that feel safe because they helped people earn promotions.Alli describes how effective change comes from running experiments, not making instant identity-level shifts, so your nervous system learns that “different” is safe.Erik emphasizes that changing norms requires influence, and that framing behavior changes around shared wins helps peers and leaders buy in.💡 Key Takeaways Invisible rules can be both harmful and useful, depending on what they’re trying to solve and whether they’re implemented in a way that supports real outcomes.When you want to change an individual behavior, pair “who do I want to be?” with a time-limited experiment to gather data and reduce the fear of committing forever.For structural change (processes, cadence, meeting design), tie changes to shared wins so the organization understands the point.You usually cannot change these patterns in a vacuum. People are watching, so communicating clearly and aligning with outcomes is part of the leadership move.❓ Questions That Mattered Are these invisible rules actually cultural expectations, or are they performance anxiety patterns that individuals bring from previous environments?What are we trying to solve for when we enforce an availability expectation, and is timeliness the real driver?If I don’t do this, who do I think will be mad at me, and what does that reveal about the root consequence?How do I explain the behavior change so peers and my boss understand it as a shared win, not a personal preference?🗣️ Notable Quotes “When you start a new job, it's kind of like you're drinking from a fire hose.”“Doing something different is safe… you’re not just gonna talk yourself into one day waking up and being like, I lead differently now.”“It ended up being really well received, and I never went back to having meetings on Wednesdays.”🔗 Links & Resources Listen To Other Episodes Co-Hosted With Alli

    18 min

  8. Jun 19

    180: "What If Your Team Already Knows What’s Broken, But Won’t Say It?" (reflections on Josh Frantz)

    🧠 Erik’s Take After reflecting on his conversation with Josh Frantz, Erik kept coming back to a deceptively simple idea: every company has hidden problems that leadership would absolutely want to solve — if they actually knew about them. The challenge isn’t just finding the problems. It’s creating an environment where people feel safe enough to tell the truth. What stood out most to Erik wasn’t the technology behind Blyndspot. It was the human reality underneath it. Employees often stay silent not because they don’t care, but because speaking up feels risky. Sometimes they fear blame. Sometimes they fear retaliation. Sometimes they fear making themselves obsolete. The real challenge for leaders, then, is psychological safety. Not performative safety. Real safety. Erik also found himself reflecting on how much organizational progress depends on workflow clarity. Most companies still don’t truly understand how work gets done inside their business — especially all the unofficial workarounds employees create to keep broken systems functioning. As AI adoption accelerates, that lack of workflow clarity may become one of the greatest bottlenecks companies face. 🎯 Top Insights from the Interview Psychological Safety Must Be Earned Leaders can’t simply claim feedback is safe. Employees need evidence that honesty won’t be punished — and that their ideas will actually be heard. Anonymous Feedback Changes Behavior. True anonymity increases both participation and honesty. The moment employees believe leadership can identify them, the quality of feedback changes dramatically. Closing the Loop Builds Trust. If employees share feedback and never hear what happened next, participation dies. Acknowledgment matters almost as much as action itself. Workflow Is Becoming the Competitive Edge. AI can only improve systems companies actually understand. Most organizations still lack clarity around how work truly happens at the operational level. 🧩 The Personal Layer One of the ideas Erik kept wrestling with after the interview was how emotionally difficult it can be for leaders to admit there are problems inside their company they don’t fully understand yet. That admission requires humility. It also requires confronting the uncomfortable reality that employees may already know what’s broken — and may have known for a long time. Erik reflected on how many organizations unintentionally train employees to stay quiet. Sometimes through fear. Sometimes through inaction. Sometimes simply by asking for input and then disappearing without responding. The conversation also reinforced something Erik deeply believes about leadership: trust is built behaviorally, not rhetorically. Leaders don’t create safety by saying “my door is always open.” They create it by consistently responding to truth without punishment. 🧰 From Insight to Action Audit where feedback currently dies inside your organization. Ask yourself whether employees genuinely believe it’s safe to speak honestly. Create visible follow-through when employees share ideas or concerns. Clarify workflows before trying to automate them with AI. 🗣️ Notable Quotes “There are problems that exist in your company that if you knew about them, you would take action.” “Your people don’t want to tell you.” “You’re going to have to work really hard to build psychological safety.” “Workflow is now king.” “You can’t automate what you don’t already know how to do.” 🔗 Links & Resources Listen to Josh Fratz's episode

    9 min
See All (186)

5
out of 5
42 Ratings

About

Most people know the headline of a leader’s story. Few know the path it took to get there. This podcast goes beyond titles, book launches and business wins, to explore the lived journey behind the thought leader. Through deep, unhurried conversations, we uncover the moments that shaped them—the doubts, pivots, convictions, and quiet breakthroughs that built their body of work. Each episode features authors, coaches, executives, and bold thinkers who have forged their own path. Instead of rehearsed talking points, they’re invited into a space where thoughtful questions unlock something more human. The result is a layered conversation that reveals not just what they preach, but how they became the kind of person who can teach it.Because we believe the best stories aren’t always told—they’re revealed. And when brilliant people are given the right questions and the room to answer them fully, what emerges is insight you can feel, frameworks you can apply, and a deeper understanding of what it truly takes to lead, create, and contribute at a meaningful level. 

Information

  • Creator
    Erik Berglund
  • Years Active
    2025 - 2026
  • Episodes
    186
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © 2026 I Have Some Questions...
  • Show Website
    I Have Some Questions...