In Defense of Plants Podcast

Please don’t change your style as in tone of voice, or calm way you question and allow the stream of consciousness. Love the discussions. The guest is always able to present lots of information and then Matt summarizes and guides the discussion with questions to pull out more specifics or to begin to discuss another part of study or research. I didn’t find merch.

The main reason I wrote this review is to address how Matt, the host, handles his introductions. He starts every interview by asking the guest “Tell us who you are and what you do”. Ok fine, that’s a proper way to start an interview, by explaining to the audience who the guest is. What bothers me is that the host isn’t doing the introduction himself. These are scientists and professionals in their field he’s interviewing, people who deserve respect. I’m not saying he is being disrespectful, but Matt is missing an opportunity to show his guests respect by having them introduce themselves. Take any talk show host for instance. Every one of them says an introduction for every guest. You wouldn’t have Jimmy Fallon announce the name of his guest, have the guest walk out, and then ask the guest who they are and what they do, that would be weird. It wouldn’t flow smoothly. It should be the host’s job to give the guest’s introduction for the sake of good presentation to the audience and breaking the ice with the guest. While pondering the justifications Matt might give for having his guests introduce themselves, the main one I can think of is, “My guest is the one who knows themself and their work the best, so if I introduce them, I probably wouldn’t summarize their career as well as they can.” Ok. This is where research comes in. I guarantee you can get a mostly full picture/summary of a somebody’s career over 10-20 minutes of online research, one that is at least suitable for a short, basic introduction at the start of a podcast. I said mostly full picture. If there’s some research project that the guest worked on a couple years ago and you forget to mention it in your introduction, that’s not a big deal. You can ask “did I miss anything?” after giving your introduction, I’m sure the guest would be happy to add something right there if you did miss something that would be good to mention. It would be a good jumping off point for the conversation. I’m sure the guest would prefer to mention something in their career that you missed in your introduction rather than doing the whole thing themselves. Matt, I know that this is the way you’ve handled every guest introduction for hundreds of episodes over multiple years of podcasting, but I see no reason other than habit as to why you shouldn’t introduce the guests yourself. It’s not too late to change and show your guests that extra bit of respect they’re missing out on. Be a host. Do the extra work, prepare an introduction, and say it yourself. But other than that, your podcast is a pretty good one.

I suggest you go to bugs need heroes

I appreciate the host’s deep knowledge but wish he could approach interviews with more of a « beginner’s mind. » Most of the conversation is commiserating, marveling, humble bragging but not on the substance of the research. Rarely do I come away with a better understanding of the subject, sadly.