The Real Estate Espresso Podcast

Victor Menasce

Welcome to The Real Estate Espresso Podcast, your morning shot of what's new in the world of real estate investing. Join investor, syndicator, developer, and author Victor J. Menasce as he shares his daily real estate investment outlook. Our weekday episodes deliver 5 minutes of high-energy, high-impact content to fuel your success. Plus, don't miss our weekend editions featuring exclusive interviews with renowned guests such as Robert Kiyosaki, Robert Helms, Peter Schiff, and more.

  1. 1d ago

    The Legacy of a Structural Failure

    Today's podcast continues our discussion of the structural failure at the former Pfizer headquarters in Midtown Manhattan, where a massive office-to-residential conversion suffered localized structural distress during construction. The investigation has only begun. Engineers have not yet reached any conclusions about the root cause, and it would be inappropriate to speculate. The building may ultimately be repaired, strengthened, and safely completed. Or investigators may determine that more extensive reconstruction is required. We simply don't know. But even before the engineering investigation is complete, another consequence has already begun to unfold. Reputation. Real estate is built on confidence. Lenders finance confidence. Investors buy confidence. Insurance companies price confidence. Residents lease confidence. When confidence disappears, value disappears. We saw this after the collapse of Champlain Towers South in Surfside, Florida. The tragedy permanently changed how buyers viewed aging condominium buildings. Reserve studies became front-page news. Deferred maintenance became a deal breaker. Insurance premiums exploded. Financing became more difficult. Thousands of condominium owners across Florida found themselves facing six-figure special assessments simply because the market had fundamentally re-priced structural risk. Whether fair or not, that event changed public perception. ------------ **Real Estate Espresso Podcast:** Spotify: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](https://open.spotify.com/show/3GvtwRmTq4r3es8cbw8jW0?si=c75ea506a6694ef1)   iTunes: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-real-estate-espresso-podcast/id1340482613)   Website: [www.victorjm.com](http://www.victorjm.com)   LinkedIn: [Victor Menasce](http://www.linkedin.com/in/vmenasce)   YouTube: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](http://www.youtube.com/@victorjmenasce6734)   Facebook: [www.facebook.com/realestateespresso](http://www.facebook.com/realestateespresso)   Email: [podcast@victorjm.com](mailto:podcast@victorjm.com)  **Y Street Capital:** Website: [www.ystreetcapital.com](http://www.ystreetcapital.com)   Facebook: [www.facebook.com/YStreetCapital](https://www.facebook.com/YStreetCapital)   Instagram: [@ystreetcapital](http://www.instagram.com/ystreetcapital)

    7 min
  2. 2d ago

    NYC High Rise Failure - Root Cause

    The structural failure on 42nd St. in Midtown Manhattan this past week made headlines all over the world. The building in question was originally an office building belonging to Pfizer and is now in the process of being converted into a residential apartment building. It is the largest office to residential conversion project in US history and will result in nearly 1600 apartments. The structural design of a building is based on several factors. The first is, of course, the weight of all of the levels of the building that are being supported above the current level. The second is the lateral forces that result from the wind, pushing the building sideways. These are usually handled with sheer walls or diagonal bracing members that prevent the building from deflecting sideways. This is where most structural engineers get it wrong. The assumption is that if the wind is blowing from one side of the building, you have a zone of high-pressure on that side in a zone of low pressure on the opposite side. intuitively this makes sense. Wind tends to flow in a straight line. But in a dense urban environment with lots of surrounding buildings, the wind can and often does go in circles as it makes its way around the neighbouring buildings. In fact, there are many examples of structural failures in New York City, where the wind can often cause a building to twist like a corkscrew rather than just trying to bend to the wind. When that happens, the structural columns in the corners are the ones that experience the most stress. They’re almost always the ones that fail first.  I’m going to bet that wind was a contributing factor. Now if you look at the weather on the day of the failure, the wind was light ranging from 5-7 mph out of the north west. Hardly the conditions that would damage a building.  The heat an humidity on July 3 triggered powerful afternoon and evening thunderstorms across the city, bringing damaging wind gusts that caused localized power outages for over 17,000 New Yorkers before conditions calmed back down. I suspect that the damage happened on July 3 and was not noticed until Tuesday when the columns progressively moved and buckled. ------------ **Real Estate Espresso Podcast:** Spotify: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](https://open.spotify.com/show/3GvtwRmTq4r3es8cbw8jW0?si=c75ea506a6694ef1)   iTunes: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-real-estate-espresso-podcast/id1340482613)   Website: [www.victorjm.com](http://www.victorjm.com)   LinkedIn: [Victor Menasce](http://www.linkedin.com/in/vmenasce)   YouTube: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](http://www.youtube.com/@victorjmenasce6734)   Facebook: [www.facebook.com/realestateespresso](http://www.facebook.com/realestateespresso)   Email: [podcast@victorjm.com](mailto:podcast@victorjm.com)  **Y Street Capital:** Website: [www.ystreetcapital.com](http://www.ystreetcapital.com)   Facebook: [www.facebook.com/YStreetCapital](https://www.facebook.com/YStreetCapital)   Instagram: [@ystreetcapital](http://www.instagram.com/ystreetcapital)

    8 min
  3. 3d ago

    Meeting Madness

    On today’s show, we’re talking about meetings, specifically the balance between enough structure to create accountability and so much meeting time that the work itself gets pushed into evenings, weekends, and sleep. I have been looking at my own calendar, and the conclusion is uncomfortable. Too much of the week is committed to talking about work. The consequence is not merely fatigue. When focused work has to be stolen from the margins of the day, commitments become less predictable. A calendar full of meetings can create the appearance of control while quietly making the organization less reliable. The research on meeting effectiveness does not support one universal format. It supports matching the communication method to the job. Routine information should usually be written. Coordination among a tightly connected team can justify a brief standup. A difficult decision may require a longer working session. A formal operating review can make sense when leaders must examine performance, challenge assumptions, allocate resources, and leave with consequential decisions.  Meeting science makes a useful distinction. If the purpose is simply to broadcast routine, non-urgent information, there is little reason to synchronize six calendars. Good asynchronous communication requires context, clarity, ownership, and documentation. It is not the absence of management. Done properly, it is management without forcing everyone to stop at the same moment. ------------ **Real Estate Espresso Podcast:** Spotify: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](https://open.spotify.com/show/3GvtwRmTq4r3es8cbw8jW0?si=c75ea506a6694ef1)   iTunes: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-real-estate-espresso-podcast/id1340482613)   Website: [www.victorjm.com](http://www.victorjm.com)   LinkedIn: [Victor Menasce](http://www.linkedin.com/in/vmenasce)   YouTube: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](http://www.youtube.com/@victorjmenasce6734)   Facebook: [www.facebook.com/realestateespresso](http://www.facebook.com/realestateespresso)   Email: [podcast@victorjm.com](mailto:podcast@victorjm.com)  **Y Street Capital:** Website: [www.ystreetcapital.com](http://www.ystreetcapital.com)   Facebook: [www.facebook.com/YStreetCapital](https://www.facebook.com/YStreetCapital)   Instagram: [@ystreetcapital](http://www.instagram.com/ystreetcapital)

    5 min
  4. 4d ago

    Free Trade Is Still Here - For Now

    Today we’re talking about the July 1 review of the United States Mexico Canada Agreement, better known as USMCA, and what it means for anyone developing or constructing buildings in North America. Leading up to July 1, the public conversation made the date sound like a cliff. Either the agreement would be renewed for another sixteen years, or it would somehow vanish overnight. That was never the actual mechanism. USMCA entered into force on July 1, 2020. The agreement has a sixteen-year term, which takes it to 2036. The six-year review was a decision point, not an expiration date. Because the three countries did not unanimously extend it, the agreement remains in force and now moves into annual reviews. The important point is that continuity and certainty are not the same thing. The legal framework survives. Goods that satisfy the agreement’s rules of origin can continue to receive preferential treatment. But businesses no longer have a fresh sixteen-year runway. They now face a recurring political checkpoint, with the possibility of changes being negotiated every year. For the construction industry, that distinction matters. Construction is a long-cycle business. A development conceived today may not buy structural steel, electrical gear, windows, elevators, HVAC equipment, or finish materials for two or three years. A manufacturer deciding where to build a plant may be making a twenty-year decision. Annual trade reviews introduce a mismatch between short political cycles and long capital commitments. ------------- **Real Estate Espresso Podcast:** Spotify: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](https://open.spotify.com/show/3GvtwRmTq4r3es8cbw8jW0?si=c75ea506a6694ef1)   iTunes: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-real-estate-espresso-podcast/id1340482613)   Website: [www.victorjm.com](http://www.victorjm.com)   LinkedIn: [Victor Menasce](http://www.linkedin.com/in/vmenasce)   YouTube: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](http://www.youtube.com/@victorjmenasce6734)   Facebook: [www.facebook.com/realestateespresso](http://www.facebook.com/realestateespresso)   Email: [podcast@victorjm.com](mailto:podcast@victorjm.com)  **Y Street Capital:** Website: [www.ystreetcapital.com](http://www.ystreetcapital.com)   Facebook: [www.facebook.com/YStreetCapital](https://www.facebook.com/YStreetCapital)   Instagram: [@ystreetcapital](http://www.instagram.com/ystreetcapital)

    5 min
  5. 5d ago

    Labor Market Contradictions

    As usual the headline doesn’t tell the story. The numbers often get revised for previous months.  This time revisions to April and May, combined with a falling unemployment rate, tell a much weaker story than the headline suggests. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that nonfarm payrolls increased by 57,000 in June. That is already a modest number for an economy of this size. But April was revised down by 31,000 jobs, from 179,000 to 148,000. May was revised down by 43,000, from 172,000 to 129,000. Together, those two prior months contained 74,000 fewer jobs than previously reported. Revisions are a normal part of survey-based data. More employers respond, seasonal factors are recalculated, and the estimate becomes more complete. The issue is not that revisions occur. The issue is that investors, lenders, and policymakers often react to the first estimate as though it were precise. In this case, the revised trend is materially softer than the original narrative. Now let us compare the payroll survey with the household survey. In June, the household survey estimated that employment fell by 507,000 people. The civilian labor force contracted by 720,000. The number of people outside the labor force increased by 832,000. At the same time, the official unemployment rate declined from 4.3 percent to 4.2 percent. To be counted as unemployed, a person must be without work and actively looking for work. When someone stops looking, that person leaves the labor force and disappears from the unemployment calculation. So the unemployment rate can fall even while employment falls, provided the labor force shrinks faster. That is exactly why the participation rate matters. It fell three tenths of a percentage point in June, to 61.5 percent. The employment-to-population ratio also fell, to 59.0 percent. Those measures are not perfect, but together they show that a smaller share of the working-age population was either employed or participating in the job market. ------------ **Real Estate Espresso Podcast:** Spotify: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](https://open.spotify.com/show/3GvtwRmTq4r3es8cbw8jW0?si=c75ea506a6694ef1)   iTunes: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](https://podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/the-real-estate-espresso-podcast/id1340482613)   Website: [www.victorjm.com](http://www.victorjm.com)   LinkedIn: [Victor Menasce](http://www.linkedin.com/in/vmenasce)   YouTube: [The Real Estate Espresso Podcast](http://www.youtube.com/@victorjmenasce6734)   Facebook: [www.facebook.com/realestateespresso](http://www.facebook.com/realestateespresso)   Email: [podcast@victorjm.com](mailto:podcast@victorjm.com)  **Y Street Capital:** Website: [www.ystreetcapital.com](http://www.ystreetcapital.com)   Facebook: [www.facebook.com/YStreetCapital](https://www.facebook.com/YStreetCapital)   Instagram: [@ystreetcapital](http://www.instagram.com/ystreetcapital)

    5 min
4.9
out of 5
133 Ratings

About

Welcome to The Real Estate Espresso Podcast, your morning shot of what's new in the world of real estate investing. Join investor, syndicator, developer, and author Victor J. Menasce as he shares his daily real estate investment outlook. Our weekday episodes deliver 5 minutes of high-energy, high-impact content to fuel your success. Plus, don't miss our weekend editions featuring exclusive interviews with renowned guests such as Robert Kiyosaki, Robert Helms, Peter Schiff, and more.

You Might Also Like