Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)

Rev. RJ Dieken, Esq. LokiEsq.Law Montana

We Read The Supreme Court's own Syllabus or Per Curium word for word, then maybe say hin then shut the microphone back off.We are the Antidote to Mainstream News and Entertainment-Hype Style coverage of the Supreme Court...What they do in the words of the RJD (Recorder of Judicial Decisions) Read by RJ Dieken and friendsVisit Montana's famous Loki Esq Law @ LokiEsq.Law (website) A Criminal Defense and Mediation Lawfirm Operating Statewide. Be Kind to one another, say hi someday. RoadsScholar80@gmai*Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

  1. 4d ago

    FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION v. SHERROD BROWN, ET AL.

    Send us Fan Mail 4th Circuit's Writ of Mandamus to force the FCC to decide an issue out of time, and in 48 hours is stayed. LokiEsq.Law Support the show

  2. Sep 29

    DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY v. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS (Removes injunction below)

    Send us Fan Mail The Court here removed the District Court's Stay. The Court held that the plaintiffs seeking a prohibition of the Governments use of the SAVE program to help states check voter rolls is overturned. The Court will decide in another case if the States are able to clean voter rolls within 90 days of an election).  Support the show

  3. Sep 26

    People Not Politicians v. Onder (Elections & the Purcell Principle)

    Send us Fan Mail  In People Not Politicians v. Onder, the Supreme Court stayed federal-court orders that would have forced Missouri to use its 2025 congressional map instead of the 2022 map. Under state law, the 2025 map cannot take effect unless voters approve it in a referendum. Relying on Purcell v. Gonzalez, the Court held that federal courts should not change a state's election rules on the eve of an election, especially here, where ballots on the 2022 map had already been printed and mailed and voting had begun. It also rejected the Eighth Circuit's view that the Missouri Supreme Court caused the late change, noting that the state court had flagged the referendum requirement months before the primary.  Support the show

  4. Sep 5

    NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE, ET AL. v. SHERROD BROWN, ET AL. (Ripeness, Admin Law, Media Discounts for people running for public office).

    Send us Fan Mail The Court did not seem to think the 4th Circuit should have made a ruling on an appeal from the 4th Circuit, therefore they grant a stay of the 4th's Stay. Support the show

  5. Sep 5

    DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA, ET AL. (Federal Election rules and Article III Standing)

    Send us Fan Mail Support the show

  6. Sep 1

    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, ET AL. v. NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES (WHITE HOUSE CONSTRUCTION, ARTICLE III STANDING)

    Send us Fan Mail The Supreme Court Thinks the National Trust for Historic Preservation in The United States Does not have Article III Standing. (Simplified) Construction on the White House East Wing can resume (Simplified) Support the show

  7. Jul 1

    WEST VIRGINIA v. B. P. J. (Transgender Athletes, Title IX)

    Send us Fan Mail  1. Title IX allows schools to provide separate women’s and men’s sports teams defined by biological sex, and West Virginia has permissibly maintained female sports for biological females consistent with Title IX.  Support the show

  8. Jul 1

    National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) (Campaign Finance/Election Law)

    Send us Fan Mail In NRSC v. FEC the Supreme Court granted Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to answer the question of whether the limits imposed by the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) on how much political parties can spend in direct coordination with their federal candidates violate the First Amendment.  Held: FECA’s political party coordinated expenditure limits violate the First Amendment. Justice Kavanaugh delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C.J., and Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Barrett, JJ., joined. Kagan, J. Filed a dissenting opinion in which Sotomayor and Jackson, JJ., joined.  Read by Jake A. Leahy.  Support the show

See All (582)

4.5
out of 5
50 Ratings

About

We Read The Supreme Court's own Syllabus or Per Curium word for word, then maybe say hin then shut the microphone back off.We are the Antidote to Mainstream News and Entertainment-Hype Style coverage of the Supreme Court...What they do in the words of the RJD (Recorder of Judicial Decisions) Read by RJ Dieken and friendsVisit Montana's famous Loki Esq Law @ LokiEsq.Law (website) A Criminal Defense and Mediation Lawfirm Operating Statewide. Be Kind to one another, say hi someday. RoadsScholar80@gmai*Note this podcast is for informational and educational purposes only.

Information

You Might Also Like