The Japan Business Mastery Show

Dr. Greg Story
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Entrepreneurship
  • Updated Weekly

For busy people, we have focused on just the key things you need to know. To be successful in business in Japan you need to know how to lead, sell and persuade. This is what we cover in the show. No matter what the issue you will get hints, information, experience and insights into securing the necessary solutions required. Everything in the show is based on real world perspectives, with a strong emphasis on offering practical steps you can take to succeed.

  1. 1d ago

    Don't Be Flat When Presenting In Japan

    "The good is the enemy of the great" applies nowhere more directly than the podium: a competent, well-prepared presenter can still deliver a talk that's instantly forgettable. As of 2026, with audiences arriving at conferences and client meetings already fatigued by notifications and back-to-back video calls, the margin between "solid" and "memorable" has narrowed to something specific and learnable — the missing "ten degrees of heat" that separates adequate content delivery from a presentation people actually remember. Why do competent, well-prepared presentations still fall flat? Covering content, answering questions, and finishing on time is not the same as delivering an impactful presentation — that requires an extra intensity most speakers never add. A technically sound talk can still fade from an audience's memory within minutes if it never breaks through the baseline noise of a busy day. This gap between competence and impact shows up across formats, from internal team briefings to keynote conference slots, and it's rarely a content problem — the material is usually fine. What's missing is the deliberate injection of energy that signals "pay attention now" rather than "here is information." Do now: Rate your last presentation's opening 30 seconds on energy alone, separate from content quality. Why does a lackluster opening doom an otherwise strong presentation? When a speaker begins at the same energy level as pre-talk small talk, the audience never receives the signal that something worth their full attention has started. Audiences arrive distracted, minds already full from meetings, commutes, and phones, so an opening that blends into ambient chatter fails to interrupt that distraction. This differs from a strong opening, which forcibly resets attention through pacing, tone, and content choice. Presentation coaches across markets — from Tokyo boardrooms to Silicon Valley pitch sessions — consistently flag the first thirty seconds as the highest-leverage, most under-used moment in any talk. Do now: Rewrite your opening line so it couldn't be mistaken for small talk if overheard out of context. What makes an opening "hook" actually work? A vivid story, a striking statistic, or a compelling quote works because it interrupts the audience's default state of passive half-attention. These hooks succeed by creating an immediate question in the listener's mind — what happens next, why does that number matter, what does that quote mean here — which pulls focus forward rather than letting it drift. This is different from simply stating the topic or agenda, which gives the brain nothing to hold onto. Speakers who consistently open this way, rather than with logistics or thanks, report noticeably higher audience retention through the rest of the talk. Do now: Draft three possible hooks — a story, a statistic, a quote — for your next presentation and pick the strongest. How do voice, eye contact, and gestures amplify a strong opening? A strong voice, deliberate gestures, and sustained eye contact turn a good opening line into a physically felt moment of attention. Eye contact matters even with large audiences — holding focus on individuals for roughly six seconds at a time creates a sense of shared attention and personal accountability, rather than a vague, unfocused gaze across the room. Voice modulation and gesture reinforce the verbal hook, making the physical delivery match the intensity of the content. Skipping these physical tools, even with excellent scripted words, leaves a hook underpowered. Do now: Practise your opening line out loud with deliberate eye contact on an imagined six-second cycle. How does physical positioning add authority and connection on stage? Moving closer to the audience or adjusting stance and posture can visibly shift how much authority and warmth a speaker projects. Standing over a seated crowd, for instance, adds a subtle sense of power to a speaker's presence, while closing physical distance can build warmth and connection depending on the moment's intent. These positioning choices work alongside vocal dynamics and eye contact rather than replacing them — non-verbal cues compound, they don't operate in isolation. Presenters who plan movement deliberately, rather than staying rooted at a lectern, tend to hold audience engagement longer. Do now: Identify one moment in your next talk where moving closer to the audience would reinforce your point. How do speakers sustain the energy of a strong opening through the whole talk? Vocal variety, well-placed pauses, and consistent energy levels are what prevent a strong start from sliding into monotone by the midpoint. Pauses in particular do double duty — they build anticipation before a key point and give the audience space to absorb it after, both of which reinforce memorability more than continuous, even-paced delivery. A powerful beginning makes sustaining energy easier because it sets the audience's expectation for the rest of the talk, but it still requires active maintenance rather than assuming momentum will carry itself. Do now: Mark two deliberate pause points in your next script, one before and one after your strongest point. Conclusion Many presentations start flat, stay flat, and finish flat — not because the content is weak, but because the extra ten degrees of heat that make a talk memorable is never deliberately added. A strong opening hook, backed by voice, eye contact, gesture, and positioning, resets audience attention in the first thirty seconds; sustaining that energy through vocal variety and pacing carries it to the end. The gap between a forgettable talk and a memorable one is smaller, and more learnable, than most presenters assume. FAQs Is a strong opening only about the words used? No — the words matter, but voice, eye contact, gestures, and physical positioning are what give an opening its full impact. Does a strong start guarantee a strong finish? Not automatically — a powerful beginning makes sustaining energy easier, but pacing, pauses, and vocal variety still need to be maintained deliberately throughout. Is six seconds of eye contact a strict rule? It's a practical guideline, not a rigid rule — the goal is sustained, individual-feeling connection rather than a vague sweep across the room. Quick Actions For Presenters •          Draft an opening hook using a story, statistic, or quote — never logistics. •          Rehearse your opening with deliberate, six-second eye contact cycles. •          Plan one moment of intentional movement toward the audience. •          Mark two pause points around your strongest content point. •          Rate your own opening's energy level separately from its content. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" (2018, 2021) and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award (2012). As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō (ザ営業), Purezen no Tatsujin (プレゼンの達人), Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō (トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう), and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā (現代版「人を動かす」リーダー). Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

  2. Oct 8

    Dealing With Objections In Japan

    Hearing "no" triggers something primal in most salespeople — the urge to push back immediately and win the point. As of 2025, with Japanese buyers increasingly comparing vendors across longer, more research-heavy purchase cycles than in the past, that instinct is more costly than ever: a rushed counter to an objection reads as pressure, not persuasion, in a market where relationship trust still outweighs closing speed. Sales training organisations like Dale Carnegie have long taught that the first job when facing an objection isn't to answer it — it's to slow down enough to hear what's actually being said. Why does immediately countering an objection usually backfire? Reacting to "no" on impulse is driven by emotion, not strategy, and it almost always weakens the sale rather than saving it. Hearing a rejection triggers a defensive instinct to justify, argue, or over-explain — but a client who has just voiced a concern isn't ready to be argued with, they're ready to be heard. This pattern shows up across sectors, from retail floor sales to complex B2B enterprise deals: the salesperson who jumps straight to rebuttal skips the step that actually uncovers what's wrong. Comparative research on negotiation across Japan, the US, and Europe consistently finds that pausing before responding correlates with higher deal-recovery rates. Do now: The next time you hear an objection, count to two silently before you speak. What is a "cushion" statement, and why does it change the outcome? A cushion is a neutral, non-committal statement that buys a few seconds to regroup instead of leaping into justification. If a client says "it's too expensive," a cushion response like "it's important to have good budget management" acknowledges the comment without conceding or arguing, keeping the conversation calm on both sides. This differs sharply from the transactional instinct to counter-argue immediately, and it mirrors techniques used in customer service de-escalation training worldwide. The pause created by a cushion isn't wasted time — it's the space that lets a salesperson ask "why" instead of "why not." Do now: Write down one cushion line you can use for your most common objection and rehearse it once today. Why is "it's too expensive" often just a headline, not the real objection? Surface-level objections like price frequently mask a different, unstated concern underneath. Much like retail shoppers who claim they dislike a colour rather than admit they can't afford an item, B2B buyers often deflect toward a safer, more socially acceptable reason. Treating the stated objection as the final answer means a salesperson may spend the rest of the call solving the wrong problem entirely. This gap between the "headline" objection and the real one is a recognised pattern across sales psychology, from consumer retail through to enterprise procurement. Do now: Next time you hear a price objection, resist responding to price at all until you've asked one more question. How do you dig deeper to uncover a client's real objection? Asking "why is that a problem?" and following up with "are there other reasons?" reliably surfaces the objections a client hasn't stated outright. The first question moves past the surface complaint toward the underlying concern — budget authority, internal politics, prior bad experiences, or timing. The second question protects against solving one objection only to be blindsided by a second, unspoken one later in the process. This two-question sequence works across industries and negotiation contexts because it shifts the salesperson from defending to listening. Do now: Add both questions to your next client call script and use them before offering any solution. How can you tell whether an objection is based on fact or misconception? Once the real objection is identified, the next step is determining whether it's grounded in accurate information or a misunderstanding — because the response required is completely different. A misconception, such as an outdated belief about delivery times, calls for a firm, evidence-backed correction. A legitimate concern, such as a genuine quality-related delivery delay, calls for acknowledgement, explanation, and a search for a workaround rather than denial. Confusing the two — arguing with a fact-based concern or apologising for a misconception — is one of the fastest ways to lose credibility mid-negotiation. Do now: Before your next objection-handling conversation, ask yourself: "Is this true, or is this a misunderstanding I can correct?" How should salespeople handle financial objections without discounting? Reframing the product as a solution that improves the client's business, rather than defending the price itself, is usually more effective than negotiating the number down. This shifts the conversation from cost to return, which resonates especially with finance-conscious buyers evaluating ROI over multiple quarters rather than a single upfront figure. Addressing objections only after fully understanding the client's actual perspective — rather than reacting to the first sentence they say — prevents wasted effort on objections that were never the real barrier to begin with. Do now: For your next price objection, prepare one sentence that reframes cost as return on investment. Conclusion Objections aren't obstacles to be defeated — they're information waiting to be understood. Pausing with a cushion, asking strategic follow-up questions, and separating fact from misconception turns a reflexive "no" into a clearer picture of what a client actually needs. Sometimes that process leads to a resolved sale; sometimes it reveals that this particular client isn't the right fit right now. Either outcome is better than pushing hard against an objection nobody has properly understood yet. FAQs Should salespeople always counter an objection immediately with evidence? No — reacting immediately is usually impulse-driven; pausing with a cushion statement and asking why first leads to better outcomes. Is "it's too expensive" usually the real objection? Often not — it frequently masks a deeper concern, similar to a shopper claiming they dislike a colour rather than admit budget constraints. Does every objection need to be overcome? No — some objections reveal a genuine mismatch, and moving on to a better-fit client can be the right call. Quick Actions For Salespeople •          Prepare one cushion statement for your most common objection. •          Practise asking "why is that a problem?" before responding to any objection. •          Follow up with "are there other reasons?" to surface hidden concerns. •          Separate fact-based objections from misconceptions before responding. •          Reframe price objections around return on investment, not discounting. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" (2018, 2021) and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award (2012). As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō (ザ営業), Purezen no Tatsujin (プレゼンの達人), Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō (トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう), and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā (現代版「人を動かす」リーダー). Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

  3. Oct 1

    Leadership Visionary in Japan

    Visionary leadership sounds inspiring until you ask the obvious question: whose vision comes first? Plenty of executives coach their teams on goals, culture, and direction while their own lives run on autopilot. That gap is where credibility quietly leaks away. Real visionary leadership starts with a leader who has already done the hard work of designing an intentional life — then applies that same discipline to the organisation. Why must a leader have a personal vision before a corporate one? A leader who hasn't organised their own life can't credibly organise anyone else's. Corporate vision statements are only as strong as the person delivering them. If a CEO's household, health, or finances are chaotic, that disorder tends to surface in how they run meetings, set priorities, and handle pressure. In Japan, where leaders are watched closely for consistency between word and conduct, this gap is especially costly — Japanese teams often read a leader's private discipline as a proxy for professional trustworthiness. In the US and parts of Europe, personal-brand inconsistency is more easily separated from corporate performance, but it still erodes trust over time. Do now: Before writing next quarter's team goals, spend an hour auditing your own — health, finances, relationships, growth. What does it actually mean to live an "intentional life"? Living intentionally means choosing your experiences deliberately instead of drifting through them. It's the discipline of deciding, in advance, what a well-lived year or decade looks like — rather than reacting to whatever lands on the calendar. This idea overlaps with what Western productivity writers call "designing your life" and what some Japanese executives frame through ikigai, the sense of a reason for being that blends purpose with daily action. Multinational leadership programs, including those built around Dale Carnegie's Leadership Training for Results, increasingly pair skills training with this kind of personal-clarity work, because skills without direction rarely stick. Do now: Write one sentence describing the person you intend to be in five years — then check this month's calendar against it. How do you build a personal vision before a corporate one? Treat your own life the way a company treats its brand — with research, imagery, and a clear direction. Corporations invest heavily in defining brand positioning: colours, tone, market placement. Individuals rarely apply that rigor to themselves, yet the exercise translates directly. Picture the home you want to live in — its location, design, colour palette, and surroundings — with the same specificity a brand strategist would bring to a product launch. A vision book, combining images and written statements, turns an abstract idea into something you can review weekly, not just imagine occasionally. Do now: Start a simple vision board this week — even four images and two sentences is enough to begin. Why does personal branding deserve the same rigor as corporate branding? Because the standards you apply to a company's image are the same standards that shape how others perceive you as a leader. This isn't vanity — it's precision. Detail the person you aspire to become: how you show up in relationships, the way you travel, the style you present, even the vehicle you drive. Comparing sectors makes the point clearly: a consumer-facing brand obsesses over every touchpoint, while a B2B firm focuses on trust and consistency. Leaders benefit from borrowing both approaches — visible polish paired with dependable follow-through — regardless of whether they operate in a startup, an SME, or a multinational. Do now: Pick one area — appearance, communication style, or daily routine — and define exactly what "on-brand" looks like for you. How should goals connect back to a personal vision? Goals only matter when they're built around the different roles a person actually plays, not just their job title. Most professionals default to career-only goal-setting, which ignores that they're also a spouse, parent, friend, and community member. Effective goal-setting maps ambitions across finance, health, relationships, and personal development, with each goal traceable back to the larger vision. Vision is the destination; goals are the vehicles that get you there. Milestones, with real timelines, keep the vehicle from stalling — a lesson increasingly emphasised in leadership development post-pandemic, as hybrid work blurred the line between professional and personal roles. Do now: List your key life roles, then write one goal under each that ladders up to your stated vision. How does personal vision-setting make someone a better leader of others? A leader who has already put their own life in order earns the credibility to help others do the same. Zig Ziglar's well-known line — that you can get everything you want in life by helping others get what they want — captures the payoff of this sequencing. Executives at organisations like Toyota and Rakuten are frequently cited for leadership development programs that start with self-management before team management, reflecting a broader shift in Japan's corporate training landscape as of 2025. When leaders demonstrate this order internally, teams cooperate more readily, because the leader's advice is backed by visible proof it works. Do now: Share one piece of your own goal progress with your team this month — visible proof outperforms advice alone. Conclusion Visionary leadership isn't a slogan applied to a company; it's a discipline applied to a life first. Leaders who define their own intentional vision — home, relationships, finances, growth — build the credibility needed to guide a team's goals with authority. The sequence matters: personal order, then organisational vision, then goals mapped to roles, then milestones that hold everyone accountable. Get that order right, and cooperation follows naturally, in Tokyo boardrooms as much as anywhere else. FAQs Personal vision should come before corporate vision, not after. Leaders who skip this step often produce corporate vision statements that sound polished but lack lived credibility. An intentional life is built through deliberate choices, not busy schedules. Filling a calendar isn't the same as directing it toward a defined future. A vision book works because it makes an abstract goal visually reviewable. Combining images and short statements keeps the vision present rather than forgotten after a single planning session. Goals fail most often when they ignore life roles beyond the professional one. Mapping goals to roles like parent, spouse, or community member produces more durable motivation than career-only targets. Teams cooperate faster with leaders who visibly practise what they teach. Demonstrated self-management builds the trust that instruction alone cannot. Quick actions for leaders ●      Block one hour this week to audit your own life across health, finances, relationships, and growth. ●      Draft a one-sentence personal vision statement and test this month's calendar against it. ●      Start a basic vision board — a handful of images plus two sentences is enough to begin. ●      Map your current goals against your life roles, not just your job title. ●      Share visible progress on a personal goal with your team to model the behaviour you're asking for. Author bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" (2018, 2021) and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award (2012). As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō (ザ営業), Purezen no Tatsujin (プレゼンの達人), Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō (トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう), and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā (現代版「人を動かす」リーダー). Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

  4. Sep 24

    Dress Presentation When Presenting In Japan

    Every presenter has heard the claim that 55% of an audience's impression comes from appearance — and almost every presenter who repeats it gets the context wrong. As of 2026, with hybrid and in-person conferences competing harder than ever for an audience's attention against the pull of a smartphone screen, what a speaker wears has become part of the message itself, not a footnote to it. Understanding what Professor Albert Mehrabian's UCLA research actually measured — and what it didn't — is the first step to using appearance strategically rather than superstitiously. Does appearance really account for 55% of an audience's impression? The 55% figure is real, but it only applies when a speaker's words and delivery contradict each other — not as a general rule for every presentation. Mehrabian's original UCLA research measured what happens when verbal content and non-verbal signals send mismatched messages; it was never a claim that appearance always outweighs content. Misquoting it as a universal law has become one of the most persistent myths in presentation training, repeated far more often than it's checked. The real lesson is narrower but more useful: incongruence between what you say and how you present it is what causes audiences, already distracted by phones and notifications, to disengage. Do now: Before your next talk, check that your energy and tone actually match your message — that alignment matters more than any wardrobe choice alone. Why does clothing choice matter more for high-energy presenters? High-energy delivery generates visible heat, and clothing that shows sweat undermines exactly the engagement a dynamic speaker is trying to build. A light blue shirt is a common trap: sweat creates a distracting two-tone effect that pulls eyes away from the message. White shirts paired with a jacket avoid this problem while maintaining a professional baseline appearance. This is a practical, physiological consideration as much as a stylistic one — the more physically animated the presentation style, the more clothing choice becomes a variable to actively manage rather than an afterthought. Do now: Test your presentation shirt under real conditions — move, gesture, and check for visible sweat patterns before you're on stage. How should presenters manage fit and colour to avoid distracting the audience? An ill-fitting suit or an overly bright jacket pulls audience focus away from the words being spoken, which defeats the purpose of dressing professionally in the first place. Fit issues — sleeves too long, shoulders too tight — read as inattention to detail, while bright colours compete visually with facial expressions, the primary channel for non-verbal communication during a talk. The goal isn't to disappear, but to ensure clothing supports the message rather than competing with it. This applies whether the setting is a formal Tokyo boardroom or a more casual startup pitch environment. Do now: Have someone photograph you mid-gesture in your presentation outfit and check what draws the eye first. What posture and clothing details trip up presenters on panels? Leg-crossing on a panel can expose hairy legs or bare ankles, an easily avoidable distraction that long socks solve immediately. Panel settings differ from solo presentations because posture is visible and sustained for extended periods, often in close proximity to other panellists and the audience. Small wardrobe choices — sock length, seating position — become more consequential in this format simply because there's more time for an audience's eye to wander. The same principle extends to tie choice: bright, patterned ties can compete for attention with a speaker's face, so muted options work better on camera and on panels alike. Do now: Before your next panel, check your socks and seating posture the way you'd check your slides. Why do small details like tie length and collar gaps undermine credibility? A visible gap between the tie knot and shirt collar, or a tie that peeks out from under the jacket, are minor details that disproportionately signal carelessness. These aren't fashion preferences so much as precision indicators — an audience registers them subconsciously as a lack of attention to detail, which can quietly erode credibility before a word is spoken. Shortening tie length slightly so it stays tucked under the jacket, and tightening the knot to the collar, are small corrections with outsized impact on perceived polish. The same logic applies globally, from Tokyo to New York: audiences notice precision even when they can't articulate why. Do now: Check your tie knot and length in a mirror before every presentation — treat it as part of your pre-talk checklist. How should footwear, accessories, and nametags be handled — and does this apply to women too? Scuffed shoes and mismatched belt-and-shoe colours undermine professionalism just as much as a poorly fitted suit, and nametags should be placed on the table or lectern, never worn while presenting. Plastic nametags catch light and attention in a way that competes with facial visibility, the single most important non-verbal channel a presenter has. While these specifics are often framed around men's attire, the underlying principle — prioritise facial visibility over fashion, and eliminate anything that visually competes with the message — applies equally to women presenters, adapted to different wardrobe norms. Do now: Do a full footwear-and-accessory check the night before any presentation, not the morning of. Conclusion Appearance doesn't override content — but it can quietly sabotage it. Sweat-prone fabrics, ill-fitting jackets, tie gaps, scuffed shoes, and distracting nametags all pull attention away from the one thing a presenter actually wants an audience focused on: the message. The goal isn't vanity, it's removing every small visual distraction so nothing competes with facial expression and delivery — the channels that actually carry the weight of communication. FAQs Does the 55% appearance statistic mean clothing matters more than content? No — it only applies when words and delivery are mismatched; otherwise content and delivery remain the primary drivers of audience impression. Is this advice only relevant for men? No — the specific wardrobe details differ, but the core principle of prioritising facial visibility over fashion applies to all presenters. Should presenters avoid bright colours entirely? Not entirely — bright jackets and patterned ties are the main culprits since they compete directly with facial expression; more muted choices keep attention on the message. Quick Actions For Presenters •          Choose white shirts over light blue to avoid visible sweat patterns. •          Check jacket and suit fit before every high-stakes presentation. •          Wear long socks and check posture before any panel appearance. •          Tighten your tie knot to the collar and shorten tie length slightly. •          Remove plastic nametags before presenting and place them on the table instead. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" (2018, 2021) and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award (2012). As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō (ザ営業), Purezen no Tatsujin (プレゼンの達人), Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō (トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう), and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā (現代版「人を動かす」リーダー). Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

  5. Sep 17

    Ending Your FY Powerfully In Japan

    December is where sales years are won or lost, and nowhere is the timing trickier than Japan, where the fiscal year runs to March rather than December. As of 2025, with hybrid work stretching the traditional bōnenkai season and travel schedules compressing the final weeks before the holiday break, salespeople who ease off in December are handing rivals a head start into the new year. Research on sales productivity cycles suggests this pre-holiday slump can cost as much as 8% of annual output — a gap that disciplined pipeline-building in December can close before January even begins. Why does sales productivity drop in December, and why does Japan's calendar make it riskier? Salespeople naturally ease off as year-end approaches, but in Japan this coincides with a fiscal year that still has three months left to run. Unlike US or European firms closing their books in December, Japanese companies operating on an April–March fiscal year are mid-cycle, not wrapping up — so prospects and decision-makers are still budgeting and planning, not disengaging. Sales teams who treat December as "dead time" waste a window when competitors are quiet and calendars, while busy with bōnenkai (forget-the-year) parties, still have room for a well-placed conversation. The productivity dip is real, but it's a choice, not a law of the calendar. Do now: Block two hours this week purely for December pipeline-building, before year-end social commitments fill the diary. How does an Opportunity Matrix uncover sales hidden inside existing accounts? An Opportunity Matrix lists every available solution across the top and every client down the side, using check marks for current purchases and A/B/C ratings for follow-up priority. This turns a vague sense that "there's more we could sell them" into a structured account-by-account plan. Enterprise software vendors and B2B service firms alike use similar account-mapping tools to spot cross-sell and upsell gaps that individual reps, focused on their own patch, often miss. The matrix works whether the client base is five accounts or five hundred — the discipline is the same. Do now: Build your matrix this week and flag every "A" opportunity for a call before the holidays. Why is December the right time to reconnect with "orphan" clients? "Orphans" are former clients who drifted away — through staff turnover, budget shifts, or economic pressure — and December is an ideal, low-pressure time to reach back out. Contacts change roles constantly in Japan's corporate structures, and a client lost under one decision-maker may be very much in play under their successor. A reconnection call in December doesn't need to close anything; it just needs to re-establish the relationship, with a meeting pencilled in for January once new-year budgets are live. Firms that systematically track lapsed accounts consistently recover more revenue than those treating churn as final. Do now: Pull your last twelve months of lost or dormant accounts and send three re-introduction messages this week. How can look-alike targeting make prospecting more efficient than cold calling? Look-alike targets are companies in the same industry as existing clients, likely to share similar needs — and they convert far better than random cold outreach. Instead of working through a generic list, salespeople can lean on the pattern-recognition already earned from serving comparable firms: the same pain points, procurement cycles, and competitive pressures tend to recur within a sector. This mirrors how B2B marketers build lookalike audiences from existing customer data — the sales version simply does it through direct calling and referral requests rather than ad platforms. Compared to sectors like manufacturing, industries with tighter networks (finance, professional services) tend to yield especially strong look-alike results. Do now: List three current clients' closest industry peers and draft one tailored opening line for each. Why is finding the right decision-maker harder in Japan than in Western markets? Decision-maker information is less openly available in Japan than in the US or Europe, making annual reports, referrals, and credibility statements more important than cold digital research. LinkedIn penetration remains comparatively low in the Japanese market, so the tools Western salespeople default to often come up short. Annual reports can surface key personnel names, but referrals through an existing network — colleagues, partners, or satisfied clients — remain the most reliable route past the gatekeeper. A well-rehearsed credibility statement becomes essential when a referral isn't available. Do now: Ask two existing clients this week whether they can introduce you to a contact at a target account. How should salespeople use credibility to get past gatekeepers and reach decision-makers? Leading with direct competitor experience, backed by concrete evidence of past results, is what earns a salesperson the right to a direct connection with a decision-maker. A general statement about services alone rarely clears a gatekeeper; pairing it with a specific, verifiable example of success with a similar company signals relevance immediately. This combination — competitor familiarity plus proof plus a confident ask — works across sectors, from consumer-facing retail accounts to complex B2B enterprise deals, because it answers the gatekeeper's real question: "why should this call go through?" Do now: Rewrite your opening credibility line this week to name a comparable client result in the first sentence. Conclusion December in Japan, known as "shiwasu" — literally, the month when even teachers are too busy to stand still — is not a time to coast. It's the last real window before the fiscal year's final stretch to build a pipeline strong enough to carry into the new year: mapping existing accounts, re-engaging lapsed clients, targeting look-alikes, and sharpening the credibility that gets a call past the gatekeeper. Salespeople who stay active through December set up not just a stronger January, but a stronger finish to the entire fiscal year. FAQs Does the December slowdown affect every market the same way? No — in fiscal-year-end markets like the US, December closes the books, but in Japan's April–March cycle, prospects are still mid-year and open to conversations most competitors have paused. Is an Opportunity Matrix only useful for large sales teams? No, it scales down easily — even a handful of accounts benefits from mapping current purchases against unclaimed solutions. Should salespeople expect to close deals in December? Not necessarily — the goal is pipeline-building and relationship-repair, with meetings and closes often landing in January once new budgets are active. Quick Actions For Salespeople •          Build an Opportunity Matrix for your top accounts before the holidays. •          Reach out to three "orphan" clients this week. •          Identify look-alike targets from your best current accounts. •          Ask your network for two decision-maker referrals. •          Rewrite your credibility statement around a specific competitor win. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" (2018, 2021) and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award (2012). As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō (ザ営業), Purezen no Tatsujin (プレゼンの達人), Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō (トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう), and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā (現代版「人を動かす」リーダー). Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

  6. Sep 10

    Getting Trust In Japan

    Every leader eventually discovers the gap between being obeyed and being trusted. In Japan's corporate culture — as much as in Sydney, Singapore or Silicon Valley — a title on a business card buys compliance, but it doesn't buy commitment. As of 2025, with talent mobility rising across Japan's white-collar workforce and post-pandemic hybrid teams making face time scarcer, the question of how leaders earn genuine trust has become a boardroom priority from Tokyo to Osaka. Research from organisations like Dale Carnegie consistently shows that earned trust, not positional authority, is what unlocks discretionary effort, creativity and retention. Why doesn't positional authority earn real trust from a team? Positional authority buys obedience, not commitment — only earned trust unlocks discretionary effort. "Automatic trust" comes from a leader's title, seniority or hierarchy, and in Japan's traditionally hierarchical corporate structures, it can look like real influence because staff comply readily. But compliance is not commitment. Executives at firms like Toyota and Rakuten increasingly recognise that genuine, "earned trust" is built through consistent, authentic interactions where leaders "talk the talk" and "walk the walk" over time. Without it, delegation becomes risky: leaders doubt their team will reliably handle tasks, which chokes time management and stalls team growth. When earned trust is present, by contrast, team members offer initiative and creativity no policy can mandate. Do now: Audit whether your team's compliance is habit-driven or trust-driven — the difference shows up the moment you're not watching. How do leaders in Japan build earned trust through everyday communication? Earned trust is built through consistent, authentic interactions, not grand gestures. It compounds slowly, through explaining the purpose behind tasks, listening to concerns, and following through on commitments. This differs from the transactional, order-issuing style still common in some traditional Japanese SMEs, and contrasts with the coaching-led management style favoured by many multinationals and Western-influenced startups operating in Japan. Comparative research across markets — Japan versus the US, Europe and Asia-Pacific — consistently finds that leaders who explain the "why" behind delegated work see higher engagement than those who simply issue instructions. Mutual understanding, not authority, is the currency that compounds into loyalty. Do now: Replace one instruction this week with an explanation — tell your team the "why," not just the "what." What communication mistakes destroy leader-team trust fastest? Losing your temper, dismissing ideas outright, and breaking promises erode trust faster than almost anything else a leader can do. These lapses are magnified in Japan's business culture, where public criticism or visible frustration can cause lasting loss of face for both parties. Insufficient communication — leaders defaulting to issuing orders instead of explaining, listening or seeking input — compounds the damage over time. Across sectors, from consumer-facing retail to B2B manufacturing, the pattern repeats: teams led by low-trust managers show measurably lower initiative and higher turnover. Japan's 2023 labour reforms, which pushed harder on workplace wellbeing and reduced overtime culture, have only sharpened employee expectations around respectful, transparent leadership. Do now: Before reacting to a mistake or a pushback, pause — a leader's next ten seconds either build or break trust. Why is delegation the missing link between trust and time management? Leaders who don't delegate effectively trap themselves in a vicious cycle of mistrust and time poverty. Without delegation, leaders have less time for the one-on-one interactions that build trust in the first place — so trust stays low, and delegation stays risky, and the loop repeats. This is a particularly acute challenge for time-poor executives across Japan's multinationals and fast-scaling startups alike, where headcount pressure leaves little slack for mentoring. Breaking the loop requires leaders to prioritise one-on-one time deliberately, rather than waiting for a quiet week that never arrives. Firms that treat delegation as a growth tool, not a workload dump, consistently report stronger succession pipelines. Do now: Block a recurring weekly slot for one-on-ones — treat it as non-negotiable as a client meeting. How should leaders invest one-on-one time to build lasting trust? Understanding a team member's motivations, interests, fears and goals is what turns delegation into development.These personal insights let leaders align delegated tasks with each person's career path, giving the work a sense of purpose rather than obligation. For successful delegation, leaders should involve team members in planning and monitoring progress, not just handing over a task and disappearing. This approach requires dedicated time that's easily deprioritised amid competing obligations — a common failure point for conglomerates managing large teams versus the more agile, relationship-dense structures typical of SMEs. Committing to these conversations consistently pays off in stronger trust and accountability. Do now: Ask one team member this week what career outcome they actually want from the next twelve months. What does an ongoing trust-building system look like for busy executives? Building trust is a continuous discipline, not a once-a-year initiative. It requires leaders to change mindset, habits and time allocation rather than repeating the same annual review cycle and hoping relationships hold. Earned trust elevates team cohesion, individual motivation and collective success — and consistent attention to trust-building efforts creates a lasting foundation that survives leadership transitions, restructures and market pressure. Leaders who treat trust as infrastructure, not sentiment, are better positioned for the retention challenges facing Japan's workforce as competition for skilled talent intensifies. Do now: Schedule a quarterly review of your own trust-building habits, not just your team's KPIs. Conclusion Trust in leadership isn't inherited with a title — it's built through the accumulation of small, consistent actions: explaining rather than ordering, listening rather than dismissing, and delegating with a team member's growth in mind. The leaders who get this right in Japan's evolving business environment, and everywhere else, aren't necessarily the most senior in the room. They're the ones who've made trust-building an ongoing habit rather than a one-off exercise. FAQs Trust built through hierarchy and trust earned through behaviour are fundamentally different, and only one drives discretionary effort. Positional or "automatic" trust secures compliance because of a leader's rank; earned trust secures commitment because of a leader's consistent, demonstrated integrity. Delegation and trust reinforce each other in a loop — low trust limits delegation, and limited delegation leaves no time to build trust. Breaking the cycle usually requires a leader to delegate deliberately before they feel fully ready, then use the freed-up time for one-on-one relationship building. Yes — trust-building norms vary by market, but the underlying behaviours (explaining, listening, following through) are consistent everywhere. In hierarchical business cultures like Japan's, visible respect and face-saving communication matter more; in flatter Western structures, transparency and direct feedback tend to carry more weight. Quick Actions For Leaders •          Distinguish, this week, between team compliance and team commitment on your own projects. •          Replace one directive with an explanation of purpose before Friday. •          Lock in a recurring one-on-one slot with each direct report. •          Ask each team member what career outcome they want from the next year. •          Review your own trust-building habits quarterly, not just team KPIs. Author Bio Dr. Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is President of Dale Carnegie Tokyo Training and Adjunct Professor at Griffith University. He is a two-time winner of the Dale Carnegie "One Carnegie Award" (2018, 2021) and recipient of the Griffith University Business School Outstanding Alumnus Award (2012). As a Dale Carnegie Master Trainer, Greg is certified to deliver globally across all leadership, communication, sales, and presentation programs, including Leadership Training for Results. He has written several books, including three best-sellers — Japan Business Mastery, Japan Sales Mastery, and Japan Presentations Mastery — along with Japan Leadership Mastery and How to Stop Wasting Money on Training. His works have been translated into Japanese, including Za Eigyō (ザ営業), Purezen no Tatsujin (プレゼンの達人), Torēningu de Okane o Muda ni Suru no wa Yamemashō (トレーニングでお金を無駄にするのはやめましょう), and Gendaiban "Hito o Ugokasu" Rīdā (現代版「人を動かす」リーダー). Greg also publishes daily business insights on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter, and hosts six weekly podcasts. On YouTube, he produces The Cutting Edge Japan Business Show, Japan Business Mastery, and Japan's Top Business Interviews, which are widely followed by executives seeking success strategies in Japan.

  7. Aug 27

    Needed Basics in Sales

    Q: Why do successful salespeople become complacent? A: Success can create a dangerous sense that the hard work has already been done. Salespeople begin allowing longer breaks, later starts and earlier finishes. These small choices reduce activity and eventually weaken the pipeline. A professional does not judge effort by past success. The professional asks whether today's actions are creating tomorrow's business. Mini-summary: Past success does not protect the future pipeline. Q: What sales basics should never be neglected? A: Prospecting must have protected time every day. The pitch must be continuously refined until it is concise, relevant and strong enough to earn attention. Salespeople also need a clear hook explaining why the person answering the telephone should connect them with the decision-maker. Mini-summary: Prospecting and pitch refinement are daily disciplines. Q: Should a sales pitch be standardised or customised? A: It should be both. The explanation of who you are and what you do can contain well-prepared common elements. The reason the buyer should care must be specific to the industry, sector, market, company and current situation. Preparation creates clarity, while customisation creates relevance. Mini-summary: Keep the foundation consistent and customise the buyer relevance. Q: Why must inbound sales leads receive an immediate response? A: Interest fades quickly. A website enquiry, search-generated lead or paid advertising response should be treated as urgent. Delayed contact allows the buyer's motivation to cool and gives competitors more opportunity. Fast follow-up demonstrates seriousness and creates momentum while the prospect is still engaged. Mini-summary: Respond while the buyer's interest is still hot. Q: How should sales professionals fight complacency in Japan? A: Japanese buyers may require patience, trust-building and internal consensus. That does not justify slow action from the salesperson. Strong professionals maintain prospecting activity, sharpen their messages, respond rapidly and follow up consistently while respecting the client's decision process. The long cycle makes disciplined basics more important, not less. Mini-summary: Respect the buyer's process without reducing your own urgency. Author Bio Dr Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is a veteran Japan CEO and trainer, author of multiple best-sellers and host of the Japan Business Mastery series. He leads leadership and presentation programmes at Dale Carnegie Training Tokyo.

  8. Aug 20

    Will They Follow Your Ideas?

    Q: Why can strong leadership become dangerous? A: Dynamic leaders are often persuasive, disciplined, hardworking and determined. Those qualities can produce results, but they can also make disagreement feel unsafe. When people expect to be overruled or criticised, they stop challenging the leader's assumptions. Mini-summary: Strength without openness can silence useful dissent. Q: What happened with the ANA meal-service idea? A: Before Shinya Katanozaka became President of ANA Holdings, he proposed letting passengers order meals whenever they wished. Passenger surveys supported the idea, but many passengers ordered immediately after take-off. The operation could not deliver the promise, so the plan was abandoned. Mini-summary: Customer enthusiasm does not automatically prove operational feasibility. Q: Why is speaking up difficult in Japan? A: Age, seniority and organisational hierarchy can discourage people from speaking truth to power. Silence may look like agreement, but it can actually reflect caution, fear or resignation. Leaders must therefore test whether support is genuine. Mini-summary: In a hierarchy, silence is not reliable evidence of agreement. Q: How can leaders prevent bad ideas from advancing? A: They need to slow down, listen fully and actively invite contrary views. Asking what could go wrong, where execution may fail and what assumptions need testing helps expose weaknesses before customers or competitors do. Mini-summary: Better questions reveal risks before execution begins. Q: Can a leader quickly repair a reputation for not listening? A: No. If the leader has been known as a bulldozer, one polite conversation will not rebuild trust. People need months of consistent evidence that thoughtful disagreement is welcomed and will not be punished. Mini-summary: Trust returns through repeated behaviour, not one announcement. Q: What is the real leadership test? A: It is not whether the leader can force an idea through. It is whether the leader can draw on the full intelligence of the people around them before deciding. Confidence should produce bold ideas, while humility should test them. Mini-summary: The best leaders combine conviction with humility. Dr Greg Story, Ph.D. in Japanese Decision-Making, is a veteran Japan CEO and trainer, author of multiple best-sellers and host of the Japan Business Mastery series. He leads leadership and presentation programmes at Dale Carnegie Training Tokyo.

See All (350)

About

For busy people, we have focused on just the key things you need to know. To be successful in business in Japan you need to know how to lead, sell and persuade. This is what we cover in the show. No matter what the issue you will get hints, information, experience and insights into securing the necessary solutions required. Everything in the show is based on real world perspectives, with a strong emphasis on offering practical steps you can take to succeed.

Information