The women who have conducted the investigation necessary to produce this podcast are exemplary at their craft. They’re also superb at disseminating their labor and it’s outcome concisely and without prejudice. They’ve taken part in the recent Netflix docuseries on this case and both their insight and knowledge on the case stand out among those closer to the case at the time of the crime and its prosecution. Their investigation exemplifies how flawed our justice system is, and how much private citizens, with no professional training in police work nor JDs, can actually contribute with more success in finding truth and how easily our legal system can fall short in doing so.
I am still left perplexed by this case, with the no firm opinion on Jens’ guilt or innocence. If he is innocent, he certainly seems to do himself more harm than good when he opens his mouth. As for Elizabeth, I am convinced of her involvement in her parents’ murder, but only in the sense that she wanted them dead due to the effects of her childhood trauma, mental illness, and drug use. I am not convinced that she was the actual killer.
The lack of a provided “conclusion” at the end of this podcast as to what exactly happened on March 30th doesn’t reflect poorly on the investigators. It instead reveals the truth of many crimes: often only those who commit crimes know what actually happened. This fact is an unacceptable truth both to the justice system and society at large. Our justice system is so unwilling to admit if they’re unsure of facts and, more so, unwillingly to leave a case without a “guilty” verdict at its conclusion, even if the “guilty” is assigned to the wrong person. A “guilty” verdict is a win and we are culture that values winning over fairness, and even justice. We are also a culture deeply uncomfortable with doubt and the presence of ambiguity in our justice system, and in general.