Verdict with Ted Cruz

Premiere Networks

Join Senator Ted Cruz and co-host Ben Ferguson as they break down the most important news stories of the day and reveal what they mean for you. On "Verdict with Ted Cruz,” you will go behind the scenes of the political debates that define our country. "Verdict with Ted Cruz" is being brought to you by Jobs, Freedom, and Security PAC, a political action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In 2022, Jobs, Freedom, and Security PAC plans to donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the Republican Party across the nation.

  1. BONUS POD: From Texas to Tehran—Cabinet Meeting Signals Full-Throttle America First Agenda

    10h ago

    BONUS POD: From Texas to Tehran—Cabinet Meeting Signals Full-Throttle America First Agenda

    1. 🇮🇷 Iran & National Security Iran is described as economically weak, with claims of: High inflation Declining oil exports Internal instability Trump’s strategy is portrayed as maximum pressure diplomacy: No sanctions relief until demands are met Willingness to escalate if negotiations fail Strong rhetoric suggests the U.S. has military and negotiating advantage 2. 🌍 Strait of Hormuz & Energy Security Highlights the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz (a key global oil route) Emphasizes concerns about global energy disruption Suggests the U.S. intends to monitor and influence stability in the region 3. 🚧 Immigration & Border Security Claims major success in: Reducing illegal immigration (even citing “zero entries”) Increasing deportations and enforcement Border policy is framed as directly tied to national security Contrasts sharply with the prior administration’s policies, which are criticized 4. 📉 Crime & Public Safety Attributes a drop in murder rates to immigration enforcement policies Suggests removing undocumented individuals reduces crime These claims are presented without independent verification in the text 5. 💰 Economy & Energy Policy Focuses on energy independence (“energy dominance”): Increasing domestic oil and gas production Reducing reliance on foreign energy Mentions: New oil production in Alaska Potential expansion in California Criticizes environmental regulations as harmful to the economy Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    13 min
  2. Election Night: Paxton Defeats Cornyn—What Happened, Why & What’s Next

    1d ago

    Election Night: Paxton Defeats Cornyn—What Happened, Why & What’s Next

    1. Election Results & Significance Ken Paxton wins decisively with roughly 64% vs 36% (a ~28-point margin). This is described as: A major upset for an incumbent A “sea change” in Republican politics Cornyn had: 24 years in the Senate Significant institutional power and funding Despite heavy financial backing (over $100M+ spent, mostly for Cornyn), Paxton wins overwhelmingly. 2. Why Paxton Won Several factors are highlighted: ✅ Anti-establishment sentiment The race was a: “Conservative grassroots vs establishment Republican” Voters favored a more ideological, outsider-style candidate. ✅ Trump’s influence Donald Trump endorsed Paxton (late in the race). The hosts argue: The endorsement boosted Paxton’s margin But Paxton was already leading in polls ✅ Perception of ideological purity Paxton is: “The most conservative attorney general in the country” This appealed to Republican primary voters. 3. The Role of Money The race becomes: One of the most expensive Senate primaries ever Despite: Massive spending (mostly pro-Cornyn) Outcome shows: 👉 Money was less decisive than voter sentiment and political alignment 4. Warning About the General Election Do not assume Republicans will easily win Historical comparison: Cruz compares this to the 2018 Texas Senate race: Democrats dramatically increased turnout He narrowly won despite being heavily outspent Key risks identified: Energized Democratic voters Lower Republican turnout in non-presidential cycles Heavy outside funding from national donors 5. Introduction of the Democratic Candidate The Democratic nominee is introduced as James Talarico. Ideologically extreme Strategically dangerous because: He presents himself in a calm, relatable manner He may appeal to moderate voters 6. Strategic Concerns for Republicans The authors emphasize: 🧠 Voter perception risk Talarico could appeal to: Moderates Less politically engaged voters 🎯 Campaign advice Republicans should: Focus on communicating Talarico’s positions Drive high voter turnout Avoid complacency Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    40 min
  3. BONUS POD: Trump Drops Uranium Ultimatum “Hand IT Over — Or It’s Gone!"

    2d ago

    BONUS POD: Trump Drops Uranium Ultimatum “Hand IT Over — Or It’s Gone!"

    1. Iranian Uranium Stockpile Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is the central sticking point in negotiations. The U.S. position is: Iran must surrender, transfer, or destroy its uranium entirely No compromise on retaining enriched material is acceptable This is a more aggressive stance than past U.S. policies (e.g., Obama-era agreements focused on limits, not elimination). 2. Diplomacy to Pressure Strategy Diplomatic negotiations Active military pressure Mentions: “self-defense strikes” naval deployments near the Strait of Hormuz 3. Strait of Hormuz as a Global Pressure Point The strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz: ~20% of global oil supply passes through it Disruptions affect oil prices, inflation, and global markets Current situation: Partially open Highly militarized  Unstable 4. Negotiation Dynamics Multiple countries involved as mediators: Oman, Qatar, Pakistan Possible compromise ideas mentioned: Transfer uranium to third countries (Pakistan, Turkey, Russia, China) Dilution under supervision 5. Global Stakeholders China → dependent on oil flow Europe → sensitive to energy prices Gulf states → reliant on exports Israel → concerned about security Russia → may benefit from energy instability 6. Economic and Market Impact Disruptions to shipping have caused: Increased insurance costs Rerouted vessels Oil market volatility Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    13 min
  4. Iran Deal! Separating Fact from Fiction, What's Next plus Maine's Nazi Communist Oyster Farmer

    3d ago

    Iran Deal! Separating Fact from Fiction, What's Next plus Maine's Nazi Communist Oyster Farmer

    🇮🇷 1. Iran Conflict & Potential Nuclear Deal Core Themes: The U.S. military campaign against Iran, has been highly successful. Iran’s military infrastructure (missiles, drones, navy) has been largely destroyed. Key Iranian leadership figures have been eliminated. A “good deal” must: Completely prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. Eliminate or control uranium enrichment. Ensure open access to the Strait of Hormuz (critical for global oil shipping). There must be NO: Giving Iran financial concessions. Allowing Iran to retain nuclear capabilities. There is much distrust of: Iran’s messaging (described as propaganda). Internal U.S. political disagreements over negotiation strategy. 🗳️ 2. U.S. Domestic Politics & Midterm Elections Core: Republicans are not necessarily in a weak position. Democratic candidates are portrayed as extreme or unelectable. Platner Democratic Senate candidate in Maine: Allegations of extreme ideology (communism, Nazism). Offensive statements and behavior. Undermine credibility of political opponents. Democrats are embracing radical candidates. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    34 min
  5. Statehood for DC & Puerto Rico? Full-Blown Political Brawl on Gerrymandering & U.S. Takes Aim at Cuban Strongman Week In Review

    5d ago

    Statehood for DC & Puerto Rico? Full-Blown Political Brawl on Gerrymandering & U.S. Takes Aim at Cuban Strongman Week In Review

    1. D.C. and Puerto Rico Statehood The U.S. Constitution intentionally established Washington, D.C. as a non-state federal district to avoid favoritism. Calls for D.C. statehood are framed as a partisan power grab to gain Democratic seats in Congress. Puerto Rico is described as: A more complex case, with internal disagreement among residents (statehood, independence, or commonwealth status). Assumed—by Democrats, according to the speaker—to lean Democratic politically. Democrats prioritize gaining and maintaining power over policy substance. Election systems and rules (e.g., California’s “top-two” system) are manipulated for advantage. A California election example is used to suggest: A possible increase in Republican support. Fear among Democrats of losing control. 2. Gerrymandering and Race A Senate Judiciary Committee hearing about racial gerrymandering. A Supreme Court decision limiting race-based redistricting. Both parties engage in gerrymandering, but Democrats are portrayed as worse offenders. Race-based districts are described as unconstitutional discrimination. The notion that minority candidates require racially drawn districts to win. Provides examples of Black Republican politicians elected in majority-white districts. The Democratic Party historically supported slavery, segregation, and Jim Crow laws. The Republican Party was founded to oppose slavery. 3. Raúl Castro Indictment Reports an indictment of former Cuban leader Raúl Castro for his alleged role in the 1996 shootdown of civilian aircraft. Strongly condemns Castro and communism. Praises U.S. legal action. Criticizes the Obama administration for engaging diplomatically with Cuba. Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    30 min
  6. Chaos in DC on Reconciliation & DOJ Judgment Fund plus Raul Castro Indicted

    6d ago

    Chaos in DC on Reconciliation & DOJ Judgment Fund plus Raul Castro Indicted

    1. Breakdown of Senate Disruption Over Reconciliation Why a planned Senate vote (a “vote-a-rama” tied to reconciliation) collapsed unexpectedly. Key points: Reconciliation is described as a process used to bypass the Senate filibuster and pass major legislation (in this case, funding border security and agencies like ICE and CBP). The vote was canceled due to division among Republican senators, not just opposition from Democrats. Several GOP senators are described as politically frustrated or weakened due to: Losing primaries or endorsements Conflict with former President Trump These internal tensions created a fragile majority, making it difficult to pass legislation. 2. Controversy Over the DOJ “Judgment Fund” A newly announced $1.776 billion Department of Justice fund intended to compensate individuals allegedly harmed by government “weaponization.” Concerns raised: Republican senators reacted with anger and suspicion during a closed-door meeting with the acting Attorney General. Some believed the fund looked like “self-dealing,” particularly because it stemmed from litigation involving Donald Trump. There were fears that: Taxpayer money could go to controversial recipients Political optics would damage Republicans Senators across the party were reportedly yelling and openly hostile, suggesting unusually intense internal conflict. Impact: Democrats planned to introduce amendments targeting the fund. Enough Republicans were prepared to side with Democrats that the bill would likely fail. Leadership postponed the vote, indicating a temporary legislative breakdown. 3. Raul Castro Indictment Discussion Castro is accused in connection with the 1996 shootdown of civilian aircraft operated by “Brothers to the Rescue.” Charges allegedly include: Conspiracy to kill U.S. nationals Murder counts Destruction of aircraft A major moment of justice A stark contrast with past U.S. policy under President Obama (who pursued diplomatic normalization with Cuba) Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz/ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/verdictwithtedcruz X: https://x.com/tedcruz X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    35 min
  7. BONUS: Daily Review With Clay and Buck - May 21 2026

    6d ago

    BONUS: Daily Review With Clay and Buck - May 21 2026

    Meet my friends, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton!  If you love Verdict, the Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show might also be in your audio wheelhouse. Politics, news analysis, and some pop culture and comedy thrown in too.   Here’s a sample episode recapping four takeaways. Give the guys a listen and then follow and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.   Branding vs. Education   Clay Travis and Buck Sexton give an in‑depth critique of the American higher education system, with specific attention to grade inflation, standardized testing, and admissions fairness. The hosts highlight Harvard University’s decision to eliminate widespread grade inflation and reintroduce a bell curve grading model, noting that a large majority of students had been receiving A grades. They trace the historical roots of grade inflation back to the Vietnam War era, when professors were reluctant to assign low grades that could result in students being drafted, and argue that the COVID‑19 pandemic accelerated the trend by lowering academic expectations nationwide.   The conversation expands into a broader analysis of elite universities such as Harvard, Yale, and Stanford, comparing traditional grading systems with pass‑fail models used in some law schools. While acknowledging arguments that elite students perform at a higher level, the hosts ultimately contend that grade inflation has eroded academic standards and made it harder to distinguish top performers. This leads into a discussion of the rise and fall of test‑optional admissions policies, which surged during 2020 but were later reversed after colleges found that standardized testing remained one of the most reliable ways to evaluate student readiness.    Get Smarter Listening to This   Ryan Girdusky joins the show to dissect the Democratic National Committee’s “autopsy” of the 2024 election loss, which returned Donald Trump to the presidency. The hosts highlight dramatic long-term political realignment trends, noting how Democrats have lost significant ground since 2009 across the Senate, House, governorships, and state legislatures, with Republicans gaining dominance in key regions. Girdusky argues the DNC report fails to address critical issues—especially Joe Biden’s age and Kamala Harris’s campaign weaknesses—while crediting effective Trump campaign messaging for reshaping voter perceptions. The discussion underscores how Republican gains, particularly in the South, reflect a broader collapse of historic Democratic strongholds and the lingering impact of the Obama era on local politics.   MN Fraud Isn't a One-Off   Clay and Buck discuss the breaking news of a major Minnesota fraud case, where the mastermind behind the “Feeding Our Future” scheme is sentenced to more than 41 years in prison for orchestrating a $250 million COVID relief fraud, funds originally intended to feed children. Clay and Buck highlight this case as a symbol of broader systemic government waste, fraud, and abuse, arguing that such large-scale theft underscores failures in federal oversight and accountability.   The conversation expands into a critique of government spending and fiscal policy, with the hosts asserting that fraud like this is not an isolated incident but part of a larger trend of mismanagement of taxpayer dollars. They argue that calls from Democrats to raise taxes—particularly on high earners—ignore the core issue of inefficient spending, contending that Americans are already overpaying into a system riddled with waste. This naturally leads into a broader economic debate, including criticism of progressive figures such as Zohran Mamdani and commentary on Jeff Bezos’ public remarks about taxation and public spending, which the hosts use to argue that increasing tax revenue does not necessarily lead to better outcomes in public services like education.   After the Sports High...   Clay chats with Steve Eubanks, sports journalist and author of “Godball” - the first book to seriously examine the modern surge of public Christian faith in American sports. Steve interviewed high-profile Christian athletes including Scottie Scheffler, Riley Gaines, Kirk Cousins, Jonathan Isaac, Dabo Swinney, and others, allowing them to share—in their own words—the role faith plays in their careers and lives. Steve explores the pivotal moment one Supreme Court case made and offers rare insight from athletes and coaches into this growing revival of faith in sports.    Make sure you never miss a second of the show by subscribing to the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton show podcast wherever you get your podcasts! ihr.fm/3InlkL8   For the latest updates from Clay and Buck: https://www.clayandbuck.com/   Connect with Clay Travis and Buck Sexton on Social Media:  X - https://x.com/clayandbuck FB - https://www.facebook.com/ClayandBuck/ IG - https://www.instagram.com/clayandbuck/ YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck Rumble - https://rumble.com/c/ClayandBuck TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@clayandbuck   YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    1h 1m
  8. BONUS POD: Untouchable No More—U.S. Slaps Murder Charges on Former Cuban Leader Castro

    May 21

    BONUS POD: Untouchable No More—U.S. Slaps Murder Charges on Former Cuban Leader Castro

    1. Historic Indictment Raúl Castro has been indicted by the U.S. for murder, conspiracy, and destruction of aircraft. Charges relate to the February 24, 1996 incident where Cuban military jets shot down two civilian planes. Four people (including three U.S. citizens) were killed. 2. Allegation of Direct Responsibility Prosecutors claim: The attack was intentional, not accidental. Castro, then Cuba’s Defense Minister, authorized and helped direct the operation. Evidence cited includes: Military communications Intelligence reports Longstanding testimony 3. Delayed Justice The indictment comes nearly 30 years after the incident. It is portrayed as long-awaited accountability for victims’ families. 4. Symbolic and Political Context Announcement took place in Miami’s Freedom Tower, a symbolic site for Cuban exiles. Marks one of the first times a senior Cuban leader is charged in U.S. court. 5. Shift in U.S. Policy Approach There is a change in U.S. posture toward authoritarian regimes: From diplomacy (e.g., Obama-era engagement) To criminal prosecution, sanctions, and pressure 6. Broader Strategic Message The indictment is framed as part of a larger strategy: Indict leaders Cut financial resources Increase international isolation Encourage defections Wait for internal collapse 7. Comparison to Venezuela The approach is compared to actions taken against Nicolás Maduro. Suggests indictments can: Isolate leaders globally Trigger internal fractures within regimes 8. Limited Immediate Practical Impact Castro is 94 years old, and Cuba is unlikely to extradite him. A trial in the U.S. is uncertain. 9. Psychological and Geopolitical Impact The indictment is presented as: A “warning shot” to authoritarian regimes A tool to undermine regime stability internally Intended to send message: Leaders who harm Americans can be pursued indefinitely Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the The Ben Ferguson Show Podcast and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@VerdictwithTedCruz See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    19 min
4.6
out of 5
43,233 Ratings

About

Join Senator Ted Cruz and co-host Ben Ferguson as they break down the most important news stories of the day and reveal what they mean for you. On "Verdict with Ted Cruz,” you will go behind the scenes of the political debates that define our country. "Verdict with Ted Cruz" is being brought to you by Jobs, Freedom, and Security PAC, a political action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In 2022, Jobs, Freedom, and Security PAC plans to donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the Republican Party across the nation.

You Might Also Like