TRUE CRIME TODAY +PLUS

LISTEN AD-FREE to ALL of our True Crime Podcasts!

$5.99/mo or $39.99/yr after trial

True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews

🔎 Daily True Crime Stories | Unsolved Mysteries | Criminal Investigations | Cold Cases True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates. 🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama—giving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why. If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.

  1. Murdaugh Supreme Court Hearing: What the Justices’ Questions Might Mean

    1H AGO

    Murdaugh Supreme Court Hearing: What the Justices’ Questions Might Mean

    Did the South Carolina Supreme Court just tip its hand in Alex Murdaugh’s double murder appeal? During oral arguments, the justices came armed with pointed, highly specific questions — and most of the heat was directed at the prosecution. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis breaks down what stood out and what it could signal. Justice James immediately focused on the “egg juror” affidavit that Justice Toal excluded from the evidentiary hearing. Chief Justice Kittredge described the corroboration between jurors and independent witnesses regarding Becky Hill’s alleged conduct as “striking,” noting that Toal’s order never addressed claims Hill told jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh. The defense maintains Toal applied the wrong legal standard — and based on today’s exchange, several justices appeared open to that argument. Hill’s subsequent perjury conviction, which occurred after Toal’s ruling, loomed large over the discussion. Justice Few challenged the state’s characterization of Hill as “not completely credible,” pointing out the obvious tension in relying on a convicted perjurer. On evidentiary issues, Kittredge pushed back on the state’s use of Rule 404(b), emphasizing that the rule is designed to limit other-acts evidence, not automatically admit it. He suggested the trial court may have allowed sweeping financial crime testimony without meaningful boundaries. Defense attorney Jim Griffin reiterated that the state’s case lacked direct evidence — no eyewitnesses, no murder weapons, no biological transfer linking Murdaugh to the killings. If the financial evidence is ultimately deemed improperly admitted, the prosecution’s case could narrow significantly. Faddis outlines three possible outcomes and explains why, regardless of the state court’s decision, a federal appeal may be next.  #AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughHearing #SupremeCourt #BeckyHillPerjury #EricFaddis #JusticeKittredge #CreightonWaters #404bEvidence #MurdaughCase #NewTrialMurdaugh Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    15 min
  2. Murdaugh Oral Arguments: The State Got Hammered — Here's What Happened

    3H AGO

    Murdaugh Oral Arguments: The State Got Hammered — Here's What Happened

    The South Carolina Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Alex Murdaugh's appeal today, and Creighton Waters had a rough morning. From the opening moments, the five justices made clear they had serious questions about both the jury tampering ruling and the evidentiary decisions at trial. Justice George James immediately asked whether the court could consider the egg juror's affidavit — the juror Justice Toal refused to let testify in 2024. Harpootlian told the court he couldn't explain why she was excluded. On the Becky Hill issue, Chief Justice Kittredge pointed out that Toal's order didn't even mention the allegation that Hill told jurors not to be fooled by Murdaugh's testimony, and that corroboration between juror accounts and an independent witness was striking. Justice Few asked Waters how you call someone not completely credible when she's now a convicted perjurer. The second phase turned to evidentiary errors, where Jim Griffin argued five categories of trial court mistakes. Kittredge told Waters that South Carolina's Rule 404(b) is a rule of exclusion, not inclusion, and that the gate was left wide open for financial crimes evidence — he couldn't find a single piece that was kept out.  Waters tried to use a Fargo movie reference to illustrate financial motive and Justice Few shut him down. Defense attorney Phillip Barber argued in rebuttal that the financial evidence was used to paint Murdaugh as a person capable of anything rather than to prove motive. The court took the case under advisement. A decision could come within 60 days. The three possible outcomes: affirm the conviction, order a new trial, or remand for further proceedings. Today's hearing laid bare the fault lines in this case. #MurdaughTrial #AlexMurdaugh #OralArguments #BeckyHill #CreightonWaters #SouthCarolinaSupremeCourt #JuryTampering #TrueCrimeToday #NewTrial #TrueCrime Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    17 min
  3. Au Pair Sentenced to 10 Years — Judge Defies Prosecutors in Banfield Case

    3H AGO

    Au Pair Sentenced to 10 Years — Judge Defies Prosecutors in Banfield Case

    Prosecutors wanted her released. The judge had other plans. Juliana Peres Magalhães, the Brazilian au pair who confessed to helping her lover Brendan Banfield execute a double murder, was sentenced today to 10 years in prison. Judge Penney Azcarate rejected the Commonwealth's plea deal recommendation of time served — a stunning rebuke that extends Magalhães's incarceration by nearly eight years beyond what prosecutors agreed to. The courtroom heard from both families before the sentence came down. Deirdre Fisher spoke about losing her son Joseph Ryan — an innocent man catfished through a fake fetish profile and murdered in what was staged to look like a home invasion gone wrong. The Banfield family addressed the complexity of Juliana's role, acknowledging the manipulation she may have experienced while refusing to excuse her participation in the killings. Magalhães addressed the court directly, stating: "I know my remorse cannot bring you peace. I pray for forgiveness, and I have never forgave myself." Her testimony was crucial to convicting Brendan Banfield of aggravated murder. She detailed the plot, the fake profile, the night of the killings, and the moment she fired the shot that ended Joe Ryan's life. But Judge Azcarate's sentence makes clear that being the star witness doesn't mean avoiding accountability. This ruling raises serious questions about plea agreements and judicial discretion. What does it mean when a judge rejects a prosecutor's recommendation after a defendant has already fulfilled their end of the bargain? And what message does this send to future cooperating witnesses? Today's episode features the complete sentencing audio — every statement, every word from the bench, and the moment the gavel came down. #JulianaMagalhaes #AuPairMurder #BrendanBanfield #TrueCrimeToday #FairfaxCounty #DoubleMurder #Sentencing #JoeRyan #ChristineBanfield #CourtTV Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    42 min
  4. Nancy Guthrie: What Happens Now And What Will Matter In Court?

    5H AGO

    Nancy Guthrie: What Happens Now And What Will Matter In Court?

    FBI Director Kash Patel bypassed the Bureau's press office and released the Nancy Guthrie surveillance footage through his personal X account. No briefing. No questions. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today to examine whether the release method creates a legitimate legal vulnerability — and to assess everything else a prosecutor is dealing with eleven days into this case. The forensic centerpiece remains the forty-one-minute gap between the Nest camera going dark at 1:47 a.m. and Nancy's pacemaker losing Bluetooth at 2:28 a.m. Faddis explains what that window establishes on its own, what it still needs to become trial-ready evidence, and how a prosecutor would structure a case around it. A man detained in Rio Rico for eight hours was released without charges. At least three ransom notes with insider details were sent to media outlets. An imposter ransom arrest has already occurred. The FBI says there's no proof of life and no ongoing communication with the suspected kidnappers. Faddis breaks down the legal challenge of sorting legitimate evidence from imposter-generated noise — and how defense attorneys would use the confusion to their advantage. Roadside evidence searches eleven days after the disappearance face obvious chain of custody and degradation challenges. Faddis provides a realistic assessment of what late-stage physical recoveries are worth in court and where the prosecution's strongest and weakest positions are right now. #NancyGuthrie #KashPatel #FBIFootage #EricFaddis #GuthrieProsecution #RioRicoDetention #PacemakerEvidence #RansomNotesFraud #TrueCrimeToday #LegalBreakdown Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    13 min
  5. Nancy Guthrie: Are Millions of Amateur Detectives Helping or Hurting?

    8H AGO

    Nancy Guthrie: Are Millions of Amateur Detectives Helping or Hurting?

    Eighteen thousand tips and counting. Body language experts on every platform. Family videos analyzed frame by frame by people who've never worked a case. The Nancy Guthrie investigation has become a national obsession — and everyone thinks they're qualified to solve it. Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke spent twenty-one years at the Bureau, including time as Chief of the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program. He knows how to read people. He also knows the difference between professional behavioral assessment and what happens when millions of untrained observers decide they can spot guilt from a two-minute video. In this interview, Dreeke breaks down the audience problem. The Guthrie family is performing grief under a microscope — they know every word will be analyzed, every pause interpreted, every gesture judged. That self-consciousness changes how they present themselves. And then the public reads those changes as suspicious. Investigators are drowning in tips from people who genuinely believe they've spotted something. Most are wrong. Some are based on nothing more than gut feelings after watching videos online. How do you filter signal from that kind of noise? And the perpetrator is part of the audience too. Watching the coverage. Tracking the theories. Seeing how close — or how far — the investigation appears to be. Is all this attention helping solve the case? Or is it making everything harder? #NancyGuthrie #RobinDreeke #TrueCrimeToday #FBIBehavioral #AmateurDetectives #SavannahGuthrie #BodyLanguage #TipLine #InternetSleuths #MissingPerson Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    16 min
  6. FBI Says Sheriff Blocking Evidence in Guthrie Case — He Says "Not Even Close"

    8H AGO

    FBI Says Sheriff Blocking Evidence in Guthrie Case — He Says "Not Even Close"

    Day 13 of the Nancy Guthrie disappearance and the two agencies that should be working together are publicly contradicting each other. Federal law enforcement sources confirmed to Reuters, Fox News Digital, and NewsNation that Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos is blocking the FBI from key evidence — a glove found inside Nancy's home and DNA samples. The FBI wanted Quantico. Nanos sent it to a private lab in Florida. The FBI source called it "dumb" and "insane." Nanos fired back on local TV: "Not even close to the truth." He claims the FBI agreed with his approach. The FBI has not confirmed that. Today we dig into why this matters beyond the headlines. Nanos has a documented pattern of denying what credible sources confirm — from an AG investigation that flagged four departmental policy violations in a sexual assault case, to a nearly unanimous no-confidence vote from his own deputies, to suspending his political opponent and union critics before an election he barely won. In the Guthrie case, he's already admitted to premature crime scene release, contradictory statements, and personnel decisions that grounded critical search assets. This episode traces the full record and asks whether the man leading the most high-profile missing persons case in the country has the credibility to lead it. #NancyGuthrie #SheriffNanos #FBI #PimaCounty #SavannahGuthrie #TrueCrimeToday #Kidnapping #Tucson #TrueCrime #Arizona Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    30 min
  7. Nancy Guthrie: Attorney Breaks Down Every Investigative Failure — and What They Mean in Court

    12H AGO

    Nancy Guthrie: Attorney Breaks Down Every Investigative Failure — and What They Mean in Court

    The legal fallout from the Pima County Sheriff's Department's handling of the Nancy Guthrie disappearance is mounting. Criminal defense attorney and former felony prosecutor Eric Faddis joins True Crime Today to analyze the investigative decisions that a courtroom would scrutinize most heavily — and several of them trace directly to Sheriff Chris Nanos. The crime scene was released prematurely and investigators returned multiple times to collect evidence they missed. The department's thermal imaging aircraft was unavailable for five critical hours because the sheriff had reassigned the pilot to patrol over a personal dispute. Doorbell camera footage the department spent ten days calling unrecoverable was ultimately found by the FBI in backend server data. The sheriff made a public statement to NBC News claiming Nancy was "taken from her bed" and retracted it the following day. Faddis explains the legal weight of each decision. Chain of custody fractures from premature scene releases. The negligence threshold for failing to deploy your best search asset when the delay is tied to a documented personnel decision. The impact of ten days of investigative choices made without the case's most critical evidence. The legal risks when a lead investigator makes inaccurate public statements during a nationally covered case — both for investigation integrity and jury pool contamination. The Guthrie family's actions add another layer. They've hired private security, released escalating public videos. Faddis reads that pattern as a former prosecutor and explains what it suggests about the family's relationship with the investigation — and whether it could carry legal consequences later. If this case doesn't end with Nancy coming home alive, Faddis addresses the threshold for civil liability against a sheriff's department for a negligent investigation and whether these documented failures would meet it. #NancyGuthrie #EricFaddis #SheriffChrisNanos #CrimeSceneRelease #ThermalImaging #NestCamera #FBIRecovery #TrueCrimeToday #GuthrieDisappearance #LegalAnalysis Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872 This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

    16 min

Shows with Subscription Benefits

TRUE CRIME TODAY +PLUS

LISTEN AD-FREE to ALL of our True Crime Podcasts!

$5.99/mo or $39.99/yr after trial

4.2
out of 5
571 Ratings

About

🔎 Daily True Crime Stories | Unsolved Mysteries | Criminal Investigations | Cold Cases True Crime Today is your go-to daily true crime podcast, bringing you the latest murder cases, ongoing trials, criminal psychology insights, and shocking unsolved mysteries. Whether it’s breaking crime news, high-profile trials, serial killers, missing persons, or cold cases, we cover it all with expert analysis, investigative storytelling, and real-time updates. 🎙️ Hosted by leading crime analysts, we uncover the psychology of killers, forensic breakthroughs, police investigations, and courtroom drama—giving you the full story behind the headlines. From notorious cases to little-known crimes that deserve attention, we break down what really happened and why. If you're obsessed with true crime podcasts, criminal psychology, and investigative reporting, subscribe to True Crime Today on Apple Podcasts now! 🎧 New episodes daily.

More From True Crime Today

You Might Also Like