Sacrilegious Discourse - Bible Study for Atheists

Husband & Wife
  • 4.5 (41)
  • Religion & Spirituality
  • Updated Daily

Husband and Wife are two non-believers who have always wanted to read the Bible. Why would we subject ourselves to this you might ask? From our perspective it helps us understand where the Christians around us, here in the Midwest, are coming from when they quote the Bible at us. Husband is basically an Atheist and wife leans Agnostic but mostly Atheist and we’re just having some fun at the Bible’s expense while learning more about what our neighbors claim we’re going to hell over.Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  1. 1d ago

    Matthew Contradictions Part 2

    Matthew’s contradictions are back for Part 2, because apparently one theological pileup wasn’t enough. This time, Wife and Husband tackle whether Jesus is God, whether God can be tempted, and why Jesus speaks to God like they are separate people before turning around and exercising powers supposedly reserved for God. The Trinity enters the chat, refuses to explain itself, and promptly eats Wife’s “whole entire ass.” The contradictions spread across Matthew, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, 1 Samuel, Psalms, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Hosea, Joshua, and more. Was David alone when he ate the holy bread? Should tax collectors be welcomed or shunned? Does Yahweh want animal sacrifices, or did he never ask for them despite several books of extremely detailed instructions? Must the Sabbath be kept under penalty of death, or can Jesus simply announce that everybody misunderstood the rules? Things get darker when the hosts examine biblical slavery, the selective meaning of “love thy neighbor,” Slave Bibles, American racism, Confederate monuments, and the convenient failure of God’s supposedly perfect law to prohibit owning another human being. There are also detours into bacon, Applebee’s flair, Sabbath stick collection, Russia’s endless oil hole, Neil Gaiman accidentally replacing Neil deGrasse Tyson, Jesus as a nepo baby, and the geographically challenged savior who promised to return roughly two thousand years ago. Matthew is finally finished. The contradictions, unfortunately, are immortal. 👉 Listen now at sacrilegiousdiscourse.com 👉 Join our godless rebellion on Discord: discord.gg/VBnyTYV6nC 👉 Support the snark on Patreon: patreon.com/sacrilegiousdiscourse 📌 Topics Covered: Matthew 4, 9, 12, 19, and 27: Jesus is God, isn’t God, forgives sins, gets tempted, and asks himself why he abandoned himself.Matthew vs. 1 Samuel: David’s companions mysteriously appear when Jesus retells the holy bread story.Tax collectors are good enough for dinner with Jesus but also serve as Matthew’s example of someone believers should shun.Yahweh demands bloody animal sacrifices throughout the Pentateuch, then insists that mercy was what he wanted all along.Breaking the Sabbath gets one man stoned for gathering sticks, while Jesus treats Sabbath restrictions as flexible guidelines.Dietary law evolves from plants only, to selected animals, to nearly anything that moves, to “nothing entering the belly can defile you.”God cannot be seen without killing the observer, except by Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Isaiah, Israel, angels, and apparently half the cast.Biblical slavery, selective human equality, Slave Bibles, and the glaring absence of a divine commandment against owning people.Jesus condemns the Pharisees’ teachings before telling his followers to do whatever the Pharisees instruct.Matthew cannot agree on when Jesus will return, when the world will end, whether Earth lasts forever, or when heaven was created. 💬 Best Quote from the Episode: “For being God’s word and so many laws about how to burn meat for God’s pleasure and all the things, we seriously lack any specific rules for things that seem to really matter, like slavery.” Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/sacrilegious-discourse-bible-study-for-atheists/donations

  2. 2d ago

    Matthew Contradictions Part 1

    Matthew finally ends (sort of...), but its contradictions apparently reproduce faster than Christians at a Quiverfull convention. After digging through more than 160 possible conflicts, Wife narrows the theological pileup to 14 questions for Part 1. Is Jesus a peacemaker, or did he come bearing a sword? Should believers quietly perform good deeds, or make sure everyone sees their holiness? Is calling someone a fool punishable by hellfire, unless Jesus is the one doing it? Once again, the call is coming from inside the Gospel. The contradictions stretch from Matthew 5 through Matthew 28, colliding with Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Psalms, Proverbs, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Amos, Malachi, and more. The hosts tackle retaliation, divorce, adultery, judging others, swearing oaths, killing nonbelievers, the fate of Jewish people, and whether the gospel was intended for Israel alone or the entire world. Jesus repeatedly insists that the Law remains intact, then edits it, expands it, condenses it, and occasionally acts like the previous version desperately needed a software update. There are also detours into evangelical rule-shopping, Christian antisemitism, abortion rights, the continued treatment of women as property, Pedro Pascal, suspicious Goodreads ratings, and why saying “May Thor’s thunder be with you” is somehow ruder than casually imposing Christianity on a stranger. This was supposed to be one episode. Matthew’s inability to keep his story straight had other plans. 👉 Listen now at sacrilegiousdiscourse.com 👉 Join our godless rebellion on Discord: discord.gg/VBnyTYV6nC 👉 Support the snark on Patreon: patreon.com/sacrilegiousdiscourse 📌 Topics Covered: Matthew 5 vs. Matthew 10: Blessed are the peacemakers, but Jesus also brought a sword. Pick a savior.Good deeds should remain private, except when believers are specifically told to perform them where everyone can see.Calling people fools can send you to hell, unless Jesus or the biblical authors feel like doing it.“Turn the other cheek” crashes directly into the Old Testament’s eye-for-an-eye justice system.Jesus preserves the Law of Moses while simultaneously rewriting its rules on anger, adultery, divorce, and oaths.Biblical sexual morality meets the horrifying treatment of Midianite women and girls in Numbers 31.Love your enemies, judge no one, and kindly ignore all those passages demanding that nonbelievers be killed.Matthew 10 and 15 restrict the mission to Israel, while Matthew 28 suddenly launches Christianity’s worldwide expansion plan. 💬 Best Quote from the Episode: “The call came from inside the house.” — Husband Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/sacrilegious-discourse-bible-study-for-atheists/donations

  3. 6d ago

    Matthew Wrap Up: And Q&A for Chapter 28

    Matthew finally ends, and somehow its last 20 verses manage to cram in earthquakes, angels, an empty tomb, bribed guards, resurrected Jesus, doubting apostles, divine authority, the Great Commission, the beginnings of Christian separation from Judaism, and enough theological duct tape to keep church councils busy for centuries. We dig into Matthew 28 and ask the questions that apparently nobody at Sunday school was supposed to ask. If the guards were asleep, how exactly did they know the disciples stole the body? Why does an angel tell the Marys to deliver Jesus’ message only for Jesus himself to immediately show up and repeat it? And most importantly: after miracles, walking on water, healings, resurrection, and Jesus literally standing in front of them after being dead... how are some of the eleven disciples still doubting? Because if eyewitnesses allegedly saw resurrected Jesus and still weren’t convinced, maybe modern atheists deserve a little less shit for wanting evidence. Then things get bigger. We unpack Matthew’s increasingly uncomfortable “us versus the Jews” rhetoric, the lack of contemporary Roman corroboration for the supernatural claims, Jesus declaring that all authority has been given to him, and the Great Commission telling followers to make disciples of “all nations.” That leads us straight into the theological clusterfuck that would eventually become the Trinity... a doctrine the New Testament never actually spells out and later church councils spent centuries trying to hammer into something resembling coherence. Along the way, Wife declares herself God because apparently declaring divine authority is all it takes, Husband gets limited Tuesday-night jurisdiction, Dagny the cat receives emergency theological authority, Douglas Adams and Battlestar Galactica make appearances, and Matthew officially gets kicked out the door. 👉 Listen now at sacrilegiousdiscourse.com 👉 Join our godless rebellion on Discord: discord.gg/VBnyTYV6nC 👉 Support the snark on Patreon: patreon.com/sacrilegiousdiscourse 📌 Topics Covered: Matthew 28 resurrection problems: empty tomb ≠ automatic proof somebody rose from the deadAngels, earthquakes, cosmic symbolism, and Matthew’s flair for dramatic storytellingWhy the Roman guards allegedly report to Jewish chief priests—and why their bribery story makes almost no sense“But some doubted”: the apostles somehow witness resurrected Jesus and still aren’t unanimously convincedMatthew’s “the Jews believe this to this day” language and the growing separation between early Jesus-followers and other Jewish communitiesTacitus, Pliny, Suetonius, and what non-Christian Roman sources actually do—and absolutely do not—confirm about JesusThe Great Commission, spreading Christianity to “all nations,” and one of the most consequential commands in Christian historyThe Father, Son, Holy Spirit triadic formula—and how centuries of theological arguments eventually produced the doctrine of the Trinity 💬 Best Quote from the Episode: “I read the book of Matthew and it didn’t convince me, and apparently it didn’t f*****g convince his disciples either.” Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/sacrilegious-discourse-bible-study-for-atheists/donations

  4. Aug 27

    Matthew Chapter 27 Q&A: Bible Study by Atheists

    Judas hangs himself, Pilate washes his hands, Jesus gets crucified, dead saints start wandering around Jerusalem, and somehow Matthew 27 still has time to squeeze in a questionable prophecy citation and one of the ugliest seeds of Christian antisemitism. This Q&A digs into Judas’s sudden remorse, whether his betrayal was about greed, politics, or forcing Jesus to finally do some Messiah magic, and the eerie parallel between Judas and Ahithophel from 2 Samuel 15–17. Then Matthew casually attributes the “30 pieces of silver” prophecy to Jeremiah when the much more obvious source is Zechariah 11. Divine inspiration apparently needed an editor. Then there’s Jesus Barabbas, yes, possibly Jesus Barabbas, and the bizarre choice between “Jesus, son of the father” and Jesus, the supposed Son of the Father. From there, we get into Pilate’s suspiciously sympathetic portrayal, his theatrical hand-washing callback to Deuteronomy 21, and Matthew 27:25: “His blood be on us and on our children.” That verse didn’t stay confined to Matthew’s story. It became theological ammunition for centuries of antisemitism, while the actual Roman governor authorizing the actual Roman punishment somehow got progressively scrubbed of responsibility. Convenient. And then Matthew absolutely floors it into apocalypse mode. The sky goes dark. The temple curtain tears. Rocks split. Tombs open. Dead holy people get up and walk into Jerusalem. No follow-up. No sequel. No “hey, what happened to all those resurrected corpses?” Matthew just drops Bible zombies into the crucifixion narrative and keeps moving. We also dig into Psalm 22, Jesus’s “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” cry, the sour wine usually translated as vinegar, Golgotha/Calvary, the “thieves” who may actually have been political insurgents, and why Jesus gets dramatically less magical the closer he gets to the cross. Finally, we get to Joseph of Arimathea, the tomb guards found only in Matthew, and the suspiciously defensive story explaining why critics were apparently already saying Jesus’s followers stole the body. Matthew even tells us that explanation was still circulating “to this day,” which makes the guard story feel a lot less like eyewitness history and a lot more like a late-first-century rebuttal. If you like your Bible studies packed with textual problems, political spin, resurrection weirdness, and two atheists repeatedly asking why nobody ever checked on the zombies, this one’s for you. 👉 Listen now at sacrilegiousdiscourse.com 👉 Join our godless rebellion on Discord: discord.gg/VBnyTYV6nC 👉 Support the snark on Patreon: patreon.com/sacrilegiousdiscourse 📌 Topics Covered: Judas’s death in Matthew 27 — greed, political frustration, failed Messiah expectations, or a literary remix of Ahithophel?Matthew’s Jeremiah/Zechariah problem — 30 pieces of silver, a potter, and one awkward prophetic citation.Jesus Barabbas vs. Jesus the Messiah — the seriously weird “son of the father” wordplay hiding in the manuscripts.Pilate washing his hands — Roman authority gets sanitized while Jewish leaders get handed the narrative blame.Matthew 27:25 and Christian antisemitism — how one verse became historically poisonous far beyond its original scene.Golgotha, crucifixion, and political rebels — why the men beside Jesus may have been more than common thieves.Temple curtains and Bible zombies — Matthew turns the crucifixion into full-blown apocalyptic theater.The tomb guards and the stolen-body argument — Matthew appears to be answering critics who already had another explanation for the empty tomb. 💬 Best Quote from the Episode: “What happened to the zombies? What happened to Jesus? Where’s the other side of the story?”  Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/sacrilegious-discourse-bible-study-for-atheists/donations

  5. Aug 19

    Matthew Chapter 28: Bible Study by Atheists

    Jesus is dead, the tomb is sealed, guards are posted, and Matthew 28 opens by immediately throwing an earthquake, a glowing angel, terrified soldiers, and a missing corpse into the mix. Mary Magdalene and “the other Mary” arrive at the tomb, get informed that Jesus has risen, and then promptly run into the allegedly formerly-dead guy himself. Resurrection accomplished. Evidence standards… considerably less accomplished. Then Matthew gives us one of the stranger attempts at explaining away competing resurrection stories: the chief priests allegedly bribe the guards to claim Jesus’ disciples stole the body while they were sleeping. Which raises several questions, including the obvious one... if they were asleep, how the hell did they know who stole it? Meanwhile, the Bible zombies teased in Matthew 27 apparently vanish from the narrative entirely, leaving Husband increasingly furious that Scripture introduced a literal mass resurrection and then couldn’t be bothered to follow up on it. And then comes perhaps the funniest line in the entire Gospel: after everything these disciples supposedly witnessed, miracles, demons, walking on water, crucifixion, resurrection, Matthew 28:17 still admits that “some doubted.” From there Jesus delivers the Great Commission in Matthew 28:18–20, ordering his followers to make disciples of all nations. That launches us into a much bigger rant about missionaries, Christian political power, biblical illiteracy, and the maddening reality of people demanding society obey a book they may barely have read themselves. And with that… we have officially finished Matthew. The verdict? Not spiritual. Not beautiful. Barely coherent. And somehow one of the foundational texts influencing American religion and politics. Next up: Q&A, contradictions, a Matthew wrap-up, and eventually… Mark. God help us. 👉 Listen now at sacrilegiousdiscourse.com 👉 Join our godless rebellion on Discord: discord.gg/VBnyTYV6nC 👉 Support the snark on Patreon: patreon.com/sacrilegiousdiscourse 📌 Topics Covered: Matthew 28:1–10: An earthquake, a glowing angel sitting on a rock, frightened guards, and Jesus apparently refusing to stay dead.The empty tomb problem: “He’s not here” somehow becomes proof that resurrection is the only explanation.Matthew 28:11–15: Priests allegedly bribe the guards to spread the stolen-body explanation.Whatever happened to the Bible zombies from Matthew 27? Seriously. We were promised zombies.Matthew 28:17: Jesus returns from the dead…and some of his own disciples still doubt him.Matthew 28:18–20 and the Great Commission: the biblical marching orders behind centuries of Christian missionary activity.Why Christians pushing biblical morality into politics should probably read the damn Bible first.Our final verdict on Matthew: prophecy stuffing, bizarre narrative choices, theological whiplash, and one deeply unsatisfying ending. 💬 Best Quote from the Episode: “I wish the surety that you have that we're going to hell matched the surety of what you know about your f*cking Bibles.” Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/sacrilegious-discourse-bible-study-for-atheists/donations

  6. Aug 18

    Matthew Chapter 27: Bible Study by Atheists

    Matthew 27 wastes absolutely no time turning the Passion narrative into one of the strangest chapters we’ve encountered yet. Judas suddenly realizes that betraying Jesus was, in fact, a betrayal, returns his thirty pieces of silver, and hangs himself. The priests respond to this moral catastrophe by having an ethics debate about whether the blood money can go into the treasury before using it to buy a cemetery. Priorities. Then Matthew claims this fulfills Jeremiah, giving us yet another round of “wait...does that prophecy actually say what Matthew thinks it says?” Meanwhile, Jesus gets hauled before Pontius Pilate... or “Pilates,” (if Wife’s brain gets the deciding vote) where we meet Jesus Barabbas, Pilate’s ominously dreaming wife, an apparently persuadable crowd screaming for crucifixion, and Pilate dramatically washing his hands of a death sentence he still allows to happen. Jesus is mocked, beaten, crowned with thorns, marched to Golgotha, and crucified while Husband and Wife wrestle with one of their biggest problems with Matthew’s story: after chapters describing enormous crowds, miraculous healings, supernatural feats, and people flocking to Jesus...where the hell did everybody go when he actually needed them? Then Matthew decides crucifixion isn’t dramatic enough. Jesus cries, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”, dies, the temple curtain tears, an earthquake hits, rocks split, tombs break open, and dead holy people come back to life. Yes. Matthew has zombies. Sort of. They’re raised when Jesus dies but apparently don’t wander into Jerusalem until after his resurrection, which raises approximately nine thousand questions and answers almost none of them. Naturally, this sends the episode completely off the rails into 28 Days Later, The Walking Dead, The Last of Us, Ghostbusters, holy zombies, and whether Matthew is ever going to mention these resurrected people again. By the end, Joseph of Arimathea gets Jesus into a tomb, the authorities seal it and post guards because they’re worried the disciples might steal the body, and Matthew leaves us dangling one chapter away from Christianity’s main event. Along the way we also somehow detour through Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, Bon Jovi, Nickelback, Anne Hathaway, Amy Winehouse, Texas football, Will Smith, French bread, and prepositional phrases. Because apparently that’s what happens when an atheist Bible podcast reaches the crucifixion. 👉 Listen now at sacrilegiousdiscourse.com 👉 Join our godless rebellion on Discord: discord.gg/VBnyTYV6nC 👉 Support the snark on Patreon: patreon.com/sacrilegiousdiscourse 📌 Topics Covered: Matthew 27 atheist Bible breakdown: Judas regrets the betrayal, returns the silver, and abruptly hangs himself.Thirty pieces of silver and the Potter’s Field: Matthew squeezes another Old Testament “prophecy fulfillment” into the narrative.Jesus Barabbas vs. Jesus the Messiah: apparently the Passover prisoner release comes down to Battle of the Jesuses.Pontius Pilate washes his hands: when “I’m not responsible” somehow ends with you ordering the flogging anyway.Where did Jesus’ followers go? Thousands supposedly followed him...and suddenly nobody seems interested in stopping his execution.Jesus’ crucifixion and the sacrifice problem: does knowingly coming back from the dead change what “sacrifice” means?“My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” Jesus’ Aramaic cry creates another round of confusion about Elijah.Matthew’s holy zombie apocalypse: earthquakes, opened tombs, resurrected saints, and one of the Bible’s weirdest unexplained supernatural scenes. 💬 Best Quote from the Episode: “I have to tell you something. Yeah, I don't think this really happened.” Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/sacrilegious-discourse-bible-study-for-atheists/donations

  7. Aug 17

    Matthew Chapter 26 Q&A: Bible Study by Atheists

    Matthew 26 is where the Jesus story finally starts cashing all those prophecy checks it’s been writing for 25 chapters, and somehow the theological accounting gets even messier. We kick things off by correcting ourselves about the authorship of Matthew, because unlike certain ancient religious traditions, we’re perfectly capable of saying, “Yeah, we got that wrong.” From there, it’s straight into unnamed women dumping expensive ointment on Jesus, disciples arguing that the money could’ve helped the poor, and Jesus essentially responding, “The poor will still be poor tomorrow. Right now, this is about me.” Then comes Judas and the 30 pieces of silver, which raises one of Christianity’s nastiest philosophical problems: if Judas had to betray Jesus for God’s plan and prophecy to work, what exactly is Judas guilty of? We dig into free will versus divine foreknowledge, why Matthew gives Judas almost no motivation for betraying a miracle-working Messiah he supposedly followed around personally, and why the disciples themselves seem considerably less certain about Jesus’ identity than Christians would become centuries later. At the Last Supper, Jesus turns bread and wine into a new covenant ritual, sending us down rabbit holes involving Exodus 24, Jeremiah 31, the Eucharist, communion, transubstantiation, and the thoroughly bizarre idea that a cracker can retain every observable property of a cracker while becoming the literal body of Jesus. Then Jesus heads to Gethsemane, begs God three times to spare him, gets betrayed with an aggressively affectionate Judas smooch, tells an armed disciple to put away his sword, and casually claims he could summon twelve legions of angels if he really wanted to. Sure, dude. We believe you. Finally, we unravel the Sanhedrin trial, the distinction between Jewish religious authority and Roman political power, Jesus’ callbacks to Psalm 110, Daniel 7, and Zechariah 13, and the growing tension between Jesus being fully divine and also a terrified human who very much does not want to die. Sprinkle in Peter’s three denials, a c**k-a-doodle-doo, Hancock, Superman, D&D magic, pineapple pizza, and a Build-A-Bear Jesus—and somehow you’ve got one of our more educational episodes. 👉 Listen now at sacrilegiousdiscourse.com 👉 Join our godless rebellion on Discord: discord.gg/VBnyTYV6nC 👉 Support the snark on Patreon: patreon.com/sacrilegiousdiscourse 📌 Topics Covered:Who actually wrote Matthew? Spoiler: probably not Matthew—and “his students definitely wrote it” was more certainty than the evidence deserved.Matthew 26:6–13 and the unnamed woman who uses expensive ointment on Jesus while the disciples make the apparently unreasonable suggestion that maybe poor people could use the money.Judas, 30 pieces of silver, prophecy, and free will—because punishing someone for doing the thing your divine plan requires remains a bit of a theological pickle.The Last Supper, Exodus 24, and Jeremiah 31—how Jesus’ “blood of the covenant” imagery connects the meal to older Jewish covenant traditions.Communion vs. transubstantiation—symbolic remembrance is one thing; insisting the wafer is literally human flesh gets considerably weirder.Gethsemane and the hypostatic union—Jesus is fully God, fully human, terrified of dying, capable of commanding angel armies, and apparently all of these things simultaneously.Peter’s sword and the twelve legions of angels—Jesus could totally escape at any time, guys. He just...doesn’t.The Sanhedrin, Rome, Daniel 7, Psalm 110, and Jesus’ trial—how a religious dispute gets transformed into the kind of political accusation the Roman Empire might actually execute somebody over. 💬 Best Quote from the Episode:“This story only works if you're already inside Matthew's theological framework. It only works—the story only works if you already know the story.” Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/sacrilegious-discourse-bible-study-for-atheists/donations

  8. Aug 11

    Matthew Chapter 25 Q&A: Bible Study by Atheists

    Ten virgins walk into a parable, five forget their oil, and somehow the moral is not “maybe share your damn oil.” Welcome back to Matthew 25, where Jesus continues the Olivet Discourse with wedding attendants, an absentee rich guy handing servants enormous piles of money, and a final judgment that ends with humanity getting sorted like livestock. We dig into why the “virgins” are probably better understood as young unmarried wedding attendants, why their sexual status has absolutely nothing to do with the lesson, and why Jesus chose an object that can obviously be shared to illustrate something supposedly non-transferable. Then comes the Parable of the Talents, where two servants gamble their master's fortune successfully and get rewarded, while the cautious guy buries his money because he thinks his boss is an a*****e. The master basically responds, “Correct... so why didn't you at least put it in the bank?” We unpack how enormous a biblical “talent” actually was, the weird casual endorsement of interest-bearing banking, and why the story makes considerably more sense if “talents” represent abilities, opportunities, or responsibilities rather than investment capital. Otherwise, congratulations: Jesus just invented motivational finance bro Christianity. Finally, Matthew gives us the sheep and the goats, and suddenly the entrance exam for God's kingdom looks suspiciously secular: feed hungry people, give people something to drink, welcome strangers, clothe people, care for the sick, and visit prisoners. Belief isn't even listed in this particular judgment scene. Unfortunately, Jesus follows this genuinely humane ethical standard with fire, exclusion, punishment, and potentially eternal damnation. We dig into the Greek behind “eternal,” competing Christian interpretations of hell, the early church's awkward problem of Jesus taking longer than expected to return, and the bizarre fact that Christians have been saying “any minute now” for roughly two thousand years. And because it's us, there are also detours involving Chappell Roan, Melania Trump's “Be Best,” thunder apparently interrupting the episode on God's behalf, impending Southern Ohio flooding, Supernatural, and the uncomfortable realization that Matthew 25's supposed final exam might actually reward a whole bunch of atheists who simply bothered to give a shit about other people. 👉 Listen now at sacrilegiousdiscourse.com 👉 Join our godless rebellion on Discord: discord.gg/VBnyTYV6nC 👉 Support the snark on Patreon: patreon.com/sacrilegiousdiscourse 📌 Topics Covered: Matthew 25 explained from an atheist perspective: preparedness, judgment, and why Jesus apparently loves threatening deadlines.The Parable of the Ten Virgins and why five women get locked out of the party for forgetting lamp oil.Why parthenoi may mean young unmarried women... and why “virgin” mostly distracts from the damn story.The delayed bridegroom and the early Christian problem of Jesus not returning when everybody expected him to.The Parable of the Talents, biblical banking, massive sums of money, and accidentally capitalist Jesus.Sheep, goats, and a final judgment based surprisingly heavily on helping vulnerable people.Does Matthew 25 teach salvation through good works rather than belief in Jesus?Hell, eternal punishment, annihilationism, and universalism... because apparently Christianity needed multiple theories about exactly how badly God hurts you. 💬 Best Quote from the Episode: “Can we just stop at good person? Like, that seems like enough, right?” Support this podcast at — https://redcircle.com/sacrilegious-discourse-bible-study-for-atheists/donations

See All (1.4K)

4.5
out of 5
41 Ratings

About

Husband and Wife are two non-believers who have always wanted to read the Bible. Why would we subject ourselves to this you might ask? From our perspective it helps us understand where the Christians around us, here in the Midwest, are coming from when they quote the Bible at us. Husband is basically an Atheist and wife leans Agnostic but mostly Atheist and we’re just having some fun at the Bible’s expense while learning more about what our neighbors claim we’re going to hell over.Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Information

You Might Also Like