Patents: Post-Grant Podcast

Maia Harris, Troutman Pepper Locke

In this podcast series, Troutman Pepper Locke IP attorneys dive into post-grant proceedings to provide patent owners, patent challengers, and intellectual property practitioners with insights on strategies, trends, and USPTO developments.

  1. May 18

    New Preorder Patent Owner Rights in Ex Parte Reexamination

    In this episode of the Post-Grant Podcast, Andy Zappia, Bryan Smith, and Ted Merkel explore a significant new director memo that changes how ex parte reexaminations are initiated at the Patent Office. They explain what ex parte reexam is, when and why it is used, and how new preorder patent owner submissions shape strategy for both requesters and patent owners. They also discuss how tightening IPR rules have driven more filers toward reexam, and when this new preorder procedure may or may not make a meaningful difference in whether a reexamination gets ordered. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

    14 min

  2. Mar 30

    Subject Matter Eligibility Challenges in Post-Grant Proceedings

    In this episode of the Post-Grant Podcast, Andy Zappia and Nick Gallo explore how the evolving law on subject matter eligibility under Section 101 intersects with post-grant practice, particularly post-grant review (PGR) proceedings. They explain when and why PGR is available, how its broad estoppel and nine‑month filing window shape strategy, and when it may (or may not) make sense to pursue subject matter eligibility challenges at the Patent Office. Recent subject matter eligibility memos from the USPTO: Reminders on Evaluating Subject Matter Eligibility of Claims Under 35 U.S.C. 101 Advance Notice of Change to the MPEP in Light of Ex Parte Desjardins Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

    18 min

  3. 11/13/2025

    USPTO Proposes New Rules to Limit Multiple Validity Challenges

    In this episode of the Post-Grant Podcast, Andy Zappia and Bryan Smith break down the USPTO's proposed rule for IPR and PGR proceedings designed to limit multiple validity challenges to patents. They discuss how the proposed rule would limit access to those proceedings, including a mandatory stipulation requirement, an automatic denial of institution if another tribunal has rendered a determination on validity, timing-based denials when parallel cases are likely to finish first, and a proposed narrow "extraordinary circumstances" exception. They also discuss practical implications for forum selection and strategy ahead of the November 17 comment deadline for the proposed rule. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

    26 min

  4. 10/14/2025

    It Only Took 13 Years: The Federal Circuit's First Derivation Proceeding Decision

    In this episode of our Post-Grant Podcast series, Andy Zappia and Ted Merkel delve into the complexities of the least-used proceeding created by the America Invents Act (AIA): namely derivation proceedings. The discussion highlights the first Federal Circuit decision reviewing a derivation proceeding and examines the challenges petitioners face in these cases, particularly the number of elements that petitioners must prove. The hosts also explore the alternative legal strategies, including correction of inventorship claims in district court, which may offer more strategic advantages. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

    24 min

  5. 07/01/2025

    Understanding the Impact of IPR Estoppel and PTAB Discretionary Denials

    In this episode of the Post-Grant Podcast, Andy Zappia, Nick Gallo, and Bryan Smith explore the evolving landscape of estoppel in inter partes review (IPR) and post-grant review (PGR) proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The discussion centers around the recent Federal Circuit decision in the Ingenico case, which narrows the scope of IPR estoppel, and its potential tension with the PTAB's current approach to discretionary denial. The team delves into the implications of this decision for patent challengers, particularly in light of new PTAB guidance and recent cases that highlight the complexities of navigating estoppel and discretionary denial. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

    20 min

  6. 05/06/2025

    Navigating PTAB's New Approach to IPR and PGR Discretionary Denial

    In this episode of the Post-Grant Podcast, Troutman Pepper Locke Partner Andy Zappia is joined by Counsels Nick Gallo and Bryan Smith to explore recent shifts in discretionary denial practice at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). They discuss the implications of these changes for patent owners and petitioners, highlighting strategies for navigating the increased unpredictability in discretionary denial practice. The episode also discusses the PTAB's increasing focus on workload challenges and how that is impacting post-grant procedures. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

    24 min

  7. 10/23/2024

    Director Review Under the USPTO's Final Rule

    Please join our Intellectual Property and Health Sciences practice groups for our podcast series focused on strategies, trends, and other happenings in post-grant proceedings. In this episode, Troutman Pepper attorneys Andy Zappia, Kim Coghill, and Bryan Smith discuss the new final rule issued for director review in post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

    16 min

  8. 08/12/2024

    New Developments in Obviousness-Type Double Patenting and Original Patent Requirements

    Please join our Intellectual Property and Health Sciences practice groups for our podcast series focused on strategies, trends, and other happenings in post-grant proceedings. In this episode, Troutman Pepper Partners Andy Zappia, Meg O'Gara, and Duke Fitch discuss recent developments in obviousness-type double patenting and original patent requirements, and how they might impact strategies in post-grant proceedings. Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

    23 min
See All (21)

About

In this podcast series, Troutman Pepper Locke IP attorneys dive into post-grant proceedings to provide patent owners, patent challengers, and intellectual property practitioners with insights on strategies, trends, and USPTO developments.

Information

  • Creator
    Maia Harris, Troutman Pepper Locke
  • Years Active
    2021 - 2026
  • Episodes
    21
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2022-2026 Troutman Pepper Locke LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • Show Website
    Patents: Post-Grant Podcast

You Might Also Like