ThursdAI - The top AI news from the past week

From Weights & Biases, Join AI Evangelist Alex Volkov and a panel of experts to cover everything important that happened in the world of AI from the past week

Every ThursdAI, Alex Volkov hosts a panel of experts, ai engineers, data scientists and prompt spellcasters on twitter spaces, as we discuss everything major and important that happened in the world of AI for the past week. Topics include LLMs, Open source, New capabilities, OpenAI, competitors in AI space, new LLM models, AI art and diffusion aspects and much more. sub.thursdai.news

  1. 3D AGO

    📅 ThursdAI - Feb 26 - The Pentagon wants War Claude, every benchmark collapsed, and a solo founder hit $700K ARR with AI agents

    Hey, it’s Alex, let me tell you why I think this week is an inflection point. Just this week: Everyone is launching autonomous agents or features inspired by OpenClaw (Devin 2.2, Cursor, Claude Cowork, Microsoft, Perplexity and Nous announced theirs), METR and ArcAGI 2,3 benchmarks are getting saturated, 1 person companies nearing 1M ARR within months of operation by running AI agents 24/7 (we chatted with one of them on the show today, live as he broke $700K ARR barrier) and the US Department of War gives Anthropic an ultimatum to remove nearly all restrictions on Claude for war and Anthropic says NO. I’ve been covering AI for 3 years every week, and this week feels, different. So if we are nearing the singularity, let me at least keep you up to date 😅 Today on the show, we covered most of the news in the first hour + breaking news from Google, Nano Banana 2 is here, and then had 3 interviews back to back. Ben Broca with Polsia, Nader Dabit with Cognition and Philip Kiely with BaseTen. Don’t miss those conversations starting at 1 hour in. Thanks for reading ThursdAI - Highest signal weekly AI news show! This post is public so feel free to share it. Anthropic vs Department of War Earlier this week, the US “Department of War” invited Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic to a meeting, where-in Anthropic was given an ultimatum. “Remove the restrictions on Claude or Anthropic will be designated as a ‘supply chain risk’ company” and the DoD will potentially go as far as using the Defence Production Act to force Anthropic to ... comply. The two restrictions that Anthropic has in place for their models are: No use for domestic surveillance of American citizens and NO fully autonomous lethal weapens decisions given to Claude. For context, Claude is the only model that’s deployed on AWS top secret GovCloud and is used through Palantir’s AI platform. As I’m writing this, Anthropic issued a statement from Dario statement saying they will not budge on this, and will not comply. I fully commend Dario and Anthropic for this very strong backbone, but I fear that this matter is far from over, and we’ll continue to see what is the government response. EDIT: Apparently the DoD is pressuring Google and OpenAI to agree to the stipulations and employees from both companies are signing this petition https://notdivided.org/ to protest against dividing the major AI labs on this topic. Anthropic and OpenAI vs upcoming Deepseek It’s baffling just how many balls are in the air for Anthropic, as just this week also, they have publicly named 3 Chinese AI makers in “Distillation Attacks”, claiming that they have broke Terms of Service to generate over 16M conversations with Claude to improve their own models, while using proxy networks to avoid detection. This marks the first time a major AI company publicly attributed distillation attacks to specific entities by name. The most telling thing to me is not the distillation, given that Anthropic has just recently settled one of the largest copyright payouts in U.S history, paying authors about $3000/book, which was bought, trained on and destroyed by Anthropic to make Claude better. No, the most telling thing here is the fact that Anthropic chose to put DeepSeek on top of the accusation list with merely 140K conversations, where the other labs created millions. This, plus OpenAI formal memo to Congress about a similar matter, shows that the US labs are trying to prepare for Deepseek new model to drop, by saying “Every innovation they have, they stole from us”. Apparently Deepseek V4 is nearly here, it’s potentially multimodal and has been allegedly trained on Nvidia chips somewhere in Mongolia despite the export restrictions and it’s about to SLAP! Benchmark? What benchmarks? How will we know that we’re approaching the singularity? Will there be signs? Well, this week it seems that the signs are here. First, Agentica claimed that they solved all publicly available “hard for AI” tasks of the upcoming ArcAGI 3, then Confluence Labs announced that they got an unprecedented 97.9% on ArcAGI2 and finally METR published their results on the long-horizon tasks, which measure AI’s capability to solve task that take humans a certain amount of hours to do. And that graph is going parabolic, with Claude Opus 4.6 able to solve tasks of 14.6h (doubling every 49 days) with 50% success rate Why is this important? Well, this is just the benchmarks telling the story that everyone else in the industry is seeing, that approximately since December of 2025, and definitely fueled by early Feb drop of Opus 4.6 and Codex 5.3, something major shifted. Developers no longer write code, but ship 10x more features. This became such a talking point, Swyx Latent.Space coined this with https://wtfhappened2025.com/ where he collects evidence of a shelling point, something that happened in December and I think continued throughout February. Speaking of benchmarks no longer being valid, OpenAI published that the divergence between the SWE-bench verified gains with real life performance is so vast, that they will no longer be using SWE-bench verified, and will be switching to SWE-bench pro for evaluations. Everyone’s Autonomous agents (and subagents) are here Look, with over 250K Github stars, OpenAI getting Peter Steinberger on board, it’s clear now. OpenClaw made a huge dent in how people think about autonomous agents (and subagents!) It may be a “moment in time” that the model capabilities were “just good enough” to be able to run agents async for a long time. but the big labs noticed the OpenClaw excitement and are shipping like never before to make sure their users don’t switch over! Perplexity launched “Computer“, which has scheduled tasks in a compute environment, and can complete long lasting projects end to end, Cursor pivots from IDE only to running Agents in the cloud with their own environments, Claude Code added memory, and Remote Control, while Claude Cowork added Scheduled tasks, our friends from Nous shipped Hermes Agent and even Microsoft wants to bring this to their customers in Copilot. The most interesting one from these is the new Devin from Cognition. I’ve gotten access and chatted with Nader Dabit on the show about how Devin was the “OG” async coding Agent, but now as models capabilities are here, Devin can do so much more. PR reviews with devinreview.com can complete the loop between coding, fixing and testing something end to end. They have an integrated environment with a scrub so you can roll back and see what the agent did, scheduled tasks and video showing you how the agent tested your website. I’ve used it to fix bugs in ThrusdAI.news and it found a few that Claude Code didn’t even know about! You can try out Devin (for free for a week?) here This weeks buzz - W&B updates I’m happy this week, because we finally launched both 2.5 open source models that we’re making the news lately. Kimi 2.5 and MiniMax M2.5 are both live on our inference service, at very very decent prices! Check them both out here and let me know if you need some credits. From the show this week, most hosts agree that Kimi 2.5 is the best open source alternative to Opus inside OpenClaw, just give your agent the WANDB_API_KEY and ask it to set itself up with the new model! Surfing the singularity with Ben Broca and Polsia, hitting $700K ARR since December I’ve reached out to Ben and asked him to join the show this week because alongside OpenClaw blowing up since December, his Polsia startup, which builds and scales entire companies with AI agents running 24x7 has hit an unprecedented $700K ARR milestone after just a few months. We actually saw him break the $700K ARR on the show live 🎉 But get this, he’s the only employee, everything is done with AIs. He’s using Polsia to scale Polsia. Polsia let’s anyone add an existing company or create a whole new one, and then a team of agents will spin up a marketing team, a GTM motion, a research arm and you and Polsia could work together to make this company a reality. Does this actually work? IDK, the whole thing is new, I’m trying out a few things and will let you know in a few weeks if any of this worked. But it’s definitely blowing up, Ben showed us that over the last 24 hours, over 770 companies launched on Polsia, he’s hitting nearly 1M ARR with people paying $50/mo for him to run inference for them, marketing campaigns, and he just added Meta ads. This ARR chart, the live dashboard, and Ben doing all of this Solo is underlining the whole “Singularity is near” thing for me! It’s impossible to imagine something like this working even... 5 months ago, and now we just accept it as .. sure, yeah, one person can manage AIs that manage checks notes over 700 companies. What’s clever about Polsia’s architecture is the cross-company learning system: when an agent learns something useful (like “subject lines with emojis get better open rates”), that learning gets anonymized and generalized into a shared memory file that benefits every company on the platform. The more companies running on Polsia, the smarter every agent gets — like a platform effect but for agent intelligence. AI Art, Video & Audio Seedance 2.0 is finally “here” This week has not been quiet in the multimodality world either, SeeDance 2.0 from ByteDance was delayed via the API partners (was supposed to launch Feb 24) due to copyright concerns, but apparently they dropped it inside CapCut, ByteDance’s video editing software! It’s really good though what makes it absolutely incredible IMO is the video transfer, and you can’t really do that in CapCut, so we’re keep waiting for the “full model” Nano Banana 2 - Pro level intelligence, with Flash speed and pricing (Blog) Google dropped a breaking news item before the show started today, and announced Nano Banana 2, which is s

    1h 50m
  2. FEB 20

    📅 ThursdAI - Feb 19 - Gemini 3.1 Pro Drops LIVE, Sonnet 4.6 Closes Gap, OpenClaw Goes to OpenAI

    Hey, it’s Alex, let me catch you up! Since last week, OpenAI convinced OpenClaw founder Peter Steinberger to join them, while keeping OpenClaw.. well... open. Anthropic dropped Sonnet 4.6 which nearly outperforms the previous Opus and is much cheaper, Qwen released 3.5 on Chinese New Year’s Eve, while DeepSeek was silent and Elon and XAI folks deployed Grok 4.20 without any benchmarks, and it’s 4 500B models in a trenchcoat? Also, Anthropic updated rules state that it’s breaking ToS to use their plans for anything except Claude Code & Claude SDK (and then clarified that it’s OK? we’re not sure) Then Google decided to drop their Gemini 3.1 Pro preview right at the start of our show, and it’s very nearly the best LLM folks can use right now (though it didn’t pass Nisten’s vibe checks) Also, Google released Lyria 3 for music gen (though only 30 seconds?) and our own Ryan Carson blew up on X again with over 1M views for his Code Factory article, Wolfram did a deep dive into Terminal Bench and .. we have a brand new website: https://thursdai.news 🎉 Great week all in all, let’s dive in! ThursdAI - Subscribe to never feel like you’re behind. Share with your friends if you’re already subscribed! Big Companies & API updates Google releases Gemini 3.1 Pro with 77.1% on ARC-AGI-2 (X, Blog, Announcement) In a release that surprised no-one, Google decided to drop their latest update to Gemini models, and it’s quite a big update too! We’ve now seen all major labs ship big model updates in the first two months of 2026. With 77.1% on ARC-AGI 2, and 80.6% on SWE-bench verified, Gemini is not complete SOTA across the board but it’s damn near close. The kicker is, it’s VERY competitive on the pricing, with 1M context, $2 / $12 (But if you look at the trajectory, it’s really notable how quickly we’re moving, with this model being 82% better on abstract reasoning than the 3 pro released just a few months ago! The 1 Million Context Discrepancy, who’s better at long context? The most fascinating catch of the live broadcast came from LDJ, who has an eagle eye for evaluation tables. He immediately noticed something weird in Google’s reported benchmarks regarding long-context recall. On the MRCR v2 8-needle benchmark (which tests retrieval quality deep inside a massive context window), Google’s table showed Gemini 3.1 Pro getting a 26% recall score at 1 million tokens. Curiously, they marked Claude Opus 4.6 as “not supported” in that exact tier. LDJ quickly pulled up the actual receipts: Opus 4.6 at a 1-million context window gets a staggering 76% recall score. That is a massive discrepancy! It was addressed by a member of DeepMind on X in a response to me, saying that Anthropic used an internal model for evaluating this (with receipts he pulled from the Anthropic model card) Live Vibe-Coding Test for Gemini 3.1 Pro We couldn’t just stare at numbers, so Nisten immediately fired up AI Studio for a live vibe check. He threw our standard “build a mars driver simulation game” prompt at the new Gemini. The speed was absolutely breathtaking. The model generated the entire single-file HTML/JS codebase in about 20 seconds. However, when he booted it up, the result was a bit mixed. The first run actually failed to render entirely. A quick refresh got a version working, and it rendered a neat little orbital launch UI, but it completely lacked the deep physics trajectories and working simulation elements that models like OpenAI’s Codex 5.3 or Claude Opus 4.6 managed to output on the exact same prompt last week. As Nisten put it, “It’s not bad at all, but I’m not impressed compared to what Opus and Codex did. They had a fully working one with trajectories, and this one I’m just stuck.” It’s a great reminder that raw benchmarks aren’t everything. A lot of this comes down to the harness—the specific set of system prompts and sandboxes that the labs use to wrap their models. Anthropic launches Claude Sonnet 4.6, with 1M token context and near-Opus intelligence at Sonnet pricing The above Gemini release comes just a few days after Anthropic has shipped an update to the middle child of their lineup, Sonnet 4.6. With much improved Computer Use skills, updated Beta mode for 1M tokens, it achieves 79.6% on SWE-bench verified eval, showing good coding performance, while maintaining that “anthropic trained model” vibes that many people seem to prefer. Apparently in blind testing inside Claude Code, folks preferred this new model outputs to the latest Opus 4.5 around ~60% of the time, while preferring it over the previous sonnet 70% of the time. With $3/$15 per million tokens pricing, it’s cheaper than Opus, but is still more expensive than the flagship Gemini model, while being quite behind. Vibing with Sonnet 4.6 I’ve tested out Sonnet 4.6 inside my OpenClaw harness for a few days, and it was decent. It did annoy me a bit more than Opus, with misunderstanding what I ask it, but it definitely does have the same “emotional tone” as Opus. Comparing it to Codex 5.3 is very easy, it’s much nicer to talk to. IDK what kind of Anthropic magic they put in there, but if you’re on a budget, Sonnet is definitely the way to go when interacting with Agents (and you can get it to orchestrate as many Codex instances as you want if you don’t like how it writes code) For Devs: Auto prompt caching and Web Search updates One nice update Anthropic also dropped is that prompt caching (which leads to almost 90% decrease in token pricing) for developers (Blog) and a new and improved Web Search for everyone else that can now use tools Grok 4.20 - 4 groks in a trenchcoat? In a very weird release, Grok has been updated with the long hyped Grok 4.20. Elon has been promising this version for a while (since late last year in fact) and this “release” definitely felt underwhelming. There was no evaluations, no comparisons to other labs models, no charts (heck, not even a blogpost on X.ai). What we do know, is that Grok 4.20 (and Grok 4.20 Heavy) use multiple agents (4 for Grok, 16 for Heavy) to do a LOT of research and combine their answers somehow. This is apparently what the other labs use for their ultra expensive models (GPT Pro and Gemini DeepThink) but Grok is showing it in the UI, and gives these agents... names and personalities. Elon has confirmed also that what’s deployed right now is ~500B “small” base version, and that bigger versions are coming, in one of the rarest confirmations about model size from the big labs. Vibe checking this new grok, it’s really fast at research across X and the web, but I don’t really see it as a daily driver for anyone who converses with LLMs all the time. Supposedly they are planning to keep teaching this model and get it “improved week over week” so I’ll keep you up to date with major changes here. Open Source AI It seems that all the chinese OSS labs were shipping before the Chinese New Year, with Qwen being the last one of them, dropping the updated Qwen 3.5. Alibaba’s Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: First open-weight native multimodal MoE model (X, HF) Qwen decided to go for Sparse MoE architecture with this release, with a high number of experts (512) and only 17B active parameters. It’s natively multi-modal with a hybrid architecture, able to understand images/text, while being comparable to GPT 5.2 and Opus 4.5 on benches including agentic tasks. Benchmarks aside, the release page of Qwen models is a good sniff test on where these model labs are going, they have multimodality in there, but they also feature an example of how to use this model within OpenClaw, which doesn’t necessarily show off any specific capabilities, but shows that the Chinese labs are focusing on agentic behavior, tool use and mostl of all pricing! This model is also available as Qwen 3.5 Max with 1M token window (as opposed to the 256K native one on the OSS side) on their API. Agentic Coding world - The Clawfather is joining OpenAI, Anthropic loses dev mindshare This was a heck of a surprise to many folks, Peter Steinberger, announced that he’s joining OpenAI, while OpenClaw (that now sits on >200K stars in Github, and is adopted by nearly every Chinese lab) is going to become an Open Source foundation. OpenAI has also confirmed that it’s absolutely ok to use your ChatGPT plus/pro subscriptions to use inside OpenClaw, and it’s really a heck of a thing to see how quickly Peter jumped from relative anonymity (after scaling and selling PSPDFKIT ) into a spotlight. Apparently Mark Zuckerberg reached out directly as well as Sam Altman, and Peter decided to go with OpenAI despite Zuck offering more money due to “culture” This whole ClawdBot/OpenClaw debacle also shines a very interesting and negative light on Anthropic, who recently changed their ToS to highlight that their subscription can only be used for Claude Code and nothing else. This scared a lot of folks who used their Max subscription to run their Claws 24/7. Additionally Ryan echoed how the community feel about lack of DevEx/Devrel support from Anthropic in a viral post. However, it does not seem like Anthropic cares? Their revenue is going exponential (much of it due to Claude Code) Very interestingly, I went to a local Claude Code meetup here in Denver, and the folks there are.. a bit behind the “bubble” on X. Many of them didn’t even try Codex 5.3 or OpenClaw, they are maximizing their time with Claude Code like there’s no tomorrow. It has really shown me that the alpha keeps changing really fast, and many folks don’t have the time to catch up! P.S - this is why ThursdAI exists, and I’m happy to deliver the latest news to ya. This Week’s Buzz from Weights & Biases Our very own Wolfram Ravenwolf took over the Buzz corner this week to school us on the absolute chaos that is AI benchmarking. With his new role at W&B, he’s been stress-testing all

    1h 32m
  3. FEB 13

    📆 Open source just pulled up to Opus 4.6 — at 1/20th the price

    Hey dear subscriber, Alex here from W&B, let me catch you up! This week started with Anthropic releasing /fast mode for Opus 4.6, continued with ByteDance reality-shattering video model called SeeDance 2.0, and then the open weights folks pulled up! Z.ai releasing GLM-5, a 744B top ranking coder beast, and then today MiniMax dropping a heavily RL’d MiniMax M2.5, showing 80.2% on SWE-bench, nearly beating Opus 4.6! I’ve interviewed Lou from Z.AI and Olive from MiniMax on the show today back to back btw, very interesting conversations, starting after TL;DR! So while the OpenSource models were catching up to frontier, OpenAI and Google both dropped breaking news (again, during the show), with Gemini 3 Deep Think shattering the ArcAGI 2 (84.6%) and Humanity’s Last Exam (48% w/o tools)... Just an absolute beast of a model update, and OpenAI launched their Cerebras collaboration, with GPT 5.3 Codex Spark, supposedly running at over 1000 tokens per second (but not as smart) Also, crazy week for us at W&B as we scrambled to host GLM-5 at day of release, and are working on dropping Kimi K2.5 and MiniMax both on our inference service! As always, all show notes in the end, let’s DIVE IN! ThursdAI - AI is speeding up, don’t get left behind! Sub and I’ll keep you up to date with a weekly catch up Open Source LLMs Z.ai launches GLM-5 - #1 open-weights coder with 744B parameters (X, HF, W&B inference) The breakaway open-source model of the week is undeniably GLM-5 from Z.ai (formerly known to many of us as Zhipu AI). We were honored to have Lou, the Head of DevRel at Z.ai, join us live on the show at 1:00 AM Shanghai time to break down this monster of a release. GLM-5 is massive, not something you run at home (hey, that’s what W&B inference is for!) but it’s absolutely a model that’s worth thinking about if your company has on prem requirements and can’t share code with OpenAI or Anthropic. They jumped from 355B in GLM4.5 and expanded their pre-training data to a whopping 28.5T tokens to get these results. But Lou explained that it’s not only about data, they adopted DeepSeeks sparse attention (DSA) to help preserve deep reasoning over long contexts (this one has 200K) Lou summed up the generational leap from version 4.5 to 5 perfectly in four words: “Bigger, faster, better, and cheaper.” I dunno about faster, this may be one of those models that you hand off more difficult tasks to, but definitely cheaper, with $1 input/$3.20 output per 1M tokens on W&B! While the evaluations are ongoing, the one interesting tid-bit from Artificial Analysis was, this model scores the lowest on their hallucination rate bench! Think about this for a second, this model is neck-in-neck with Opus 4.5, and if Anthropic didn’t release Opus 4.6 just last week, this would be an open weights model that rivals Opus! One of the best models the western foundational labs with all their investments has out there. Absolutely insane times. MiniMax drops M2.5 - 80.2% on SWE-bench verified with just 10B active parameters (X, Blog) Just as we wrapped up our conversation with Lou, MiniMax dropped their release (though not weights yet, we’re waiting ⏰) and then Olive Song, a senior RL researcher on the team, joined the pod, and she was an absolute wealth of knowledge! Olive shared that they achieved an unbelievable 80.2% on SWE-Bench Verified. Digest this for a second: a 10B active parameter open-source model is directly trading blows with Claude Opus 4.6 (80.8%) on the one of the hardest real-world software engineering benchmark we currently have. While being alex checks notes ... 20X cheaper and much faster to run? Apparently their fast version gets up to 100 tokens/s. Olive shared the “not so secret” sauce behind this punch-above-its-weight performance. The massive leap in intelligence comes entirely from their highly decoupled Reinforcement Learning framework called “Forge.” They heavily optimized not just for correct answers, but for the end-to-end time of task performing. In the era of bloated reasoning models that spit out ten thousand “thinking” tokens before writing a line of code, MiniMax trained their model across thousands of diverse environments to use fewer tools, think more efficiently, and execute plans faster. As Olive noted, less time waiting and fewer tools called means less money spent by the user. (as confirmed by @swyx at the Windsurf leaderboard, developers often prefer fast but good enough models) I really enjoyed the interview with Olive, really recommend you listen to the whole conversation starting at 00:26:15. Kudos MiniMax on the release (and I’ll keep you updated when we add this model to our inference service) Big Labs and breaking news There’s a reason the show is called ThursdAI, and today this reason is more clear than ever, AI biggest updates happen on a Thursday, often live during the show. This happened 2 times last week and 3 times today, first with MiniMax and then with both Google and OpenAI! Google previews Gemini 3 Deep Think, top reasoning intelligence SOTA Arc AGI 2 at 84% & SOTA HLE 48.4% (X , Blog) I literally went 🤯 when Yam brought this breaking news. 84% on the ARC-AGI-2 benchmark. For context, the highest score prior to this was 68% from Opus 4.6 just last week. A jump from 68 to 84 on one of the hardest reasoning benchmarks we have is mind-bending. It also scored a 48.4% on Humanity’s Last Exam without any tools. Only available to Ultra subscribers to Gemini (not in API yet?) this model seem to be the current leader in reasoning about hard problems and is not meant for day to day chat users like you and me (though I did use it, and it’s pretty good at writing!) They posted Gold-medal performance on 2025 Physics and Chemistry Olympiads, and an insane 3455 ELO rating at CodeForces, placing it within the top 10 best competitive programmers. We’re just all moving so fast I’m worried about whiplash! But hey, this is why we’re here, we stay up to date so you don’t have to. OpenAI & Anthropic fast modes Not 20 minutes passed since the above news, when OpenAI announced a new model that works only for Pro tier members (I’m starting to notice a pattern here 😡), GPT 5.3 Codex Spark. You may be confused, didn’t we just get GPT 5.3 Codex last week? well yeah, but this one, this one is its little and super speedy brother, hosted by the Cerebras partnership they announced a while ago, which means, this coding model absolutely slaps at over 1000t/s. Yes, over 1K tokens per second can be generated with this one, though there are limits. It’s not as smart, it’s text only, it has 128K context, but still, for MANY subagents, this model is an absolute beast. It won’t refactor in one shot your whole code-base but it’ll generate and iterate on it, very very quick! OpenAI also previously updated Deep Research with GPT 5.2 series of models, and we can all say bye bye to the “older” version of models, like 5, o3 and most importantly GPT 4o, which got a LOT of people upset (enough that they have a hashtag going, #keep4o) ! Anthropic also announced their fast mode (using /fast) in Claude Code btw on Saturday, and that one is absolutely out of the scope for many users, with $225/1M tokens on output, this model will just burn through your wallet. Unlike the Spark version, this seems to be the full Opus 4.6 just... running on some dedicated hardware? I thought this was a rebranded Sonnet 5 at first but Anthropic folks confirmed that it wasn’t. Vision & Video ByteDance’s Seedance 2.0 Shatters Reality (and nobody in the US can use it) I told the panel during the show: my brain is fundamentally broken after watching the outputs from ByteDance’s new Seedance 2.0 model. If your social feed isn’t already flooded with these videos, it will be so very soon (supposedly the API launches Feb 14 on Valentines Day) We’ve seen good video models before. Sora blew our minds and then Sora 2, Veo is (still) great, Kling was fantastic. But Seedance 2.0 is an entirely different paradigm. It is a unified multimodal audio-video joint generation architecture. What does that mean? It means you can simultaneously input up to 9 reference images, 3 video clips, 3 audio clips, and text instructions all at once to generate a 15-second cinematic short film. It character consistency is beyond what we’ve seen before, physics are razor sharp (just looking at the examples folks are posting, it’s clear it’s on another level) I think very soon though, this model will be restricted, but for now, it’s really going viral due to the same strategy Sora did, folks are re-imagining famous movie and TV shows endings, doing insane mashups, and much more! Many of these are going viral over the wall in China. The level of director-like control is unprecedented. But the absolute craziest part is the sound and physics. Seedance 2.0 natively generates dual-channel stereo audio with ASMR-level Foley detail. If you generate a video of a guy taking a pizza out of a brick oven, you hear the exact scratch of the metal spatula, the crackle of the fire, the thud of the pizza box, and the rustling of the cardboard as he closes it. All perfectly synced to the visuals. Seedance 2 feels like “borrowed realism”. Previous models had only images and their training to base their generations on. It 2 accepts up to 3 video references in addition to images and sounds. This is why some of the videos feel like a new jump in visual capabilities. I have a hunch that ByteDance will try and clamp down on copyrighted content before releasing this model publicly, but for now the results are very very entertaining and I can’t help but wonder, who is the first creator that will just..remake the ending of GOT last season!? Trying this out is hard right now, especially in the US, but there’s a free way to test it out with a VPN, go to doubao.com/chat when connected from a VPN and s

    1h 28m
  4. FEB 6

    📆 ThursdAI - Feb 5 - Opus 4.6 was #1 for ONE HOUR before GPT 5.3 Codex, Voxtral transcription, Codex app, Qwen Coder Next & the Agentic Internet

    Hey, Alex from W&B here 👋 Let me catch you up! The most important news about AI this week today are, Anthropic updates Opus to 4.6 with 1M context window, and they held the crown for literally 1 hour before OpenAI released their GPT 5.3 Codex also today, with 25% faster speed and lower token utilization. “GPT-5.3-Codex is our first model that was instrumental in creating itself. The Codex team used early versions to debug its own training, manage its own deployment, and diagnose test results.” We had VB from OpenAI jump on to tell us about the cool features on Codex, so don’t miss that part. And this is just an icing on otherwise very insane AI news week cake, as we’ve also had a SOTA transcription release from Mistral, both Grok and Kling are releasing incredible, audio native video models with near perfect lip-sync and Ace 1.5 drops a fully open source music generator you can run on your mac! Also, the internet all but lost it after Clawdbot was rebranded to Molt and then to OpenClaw, and.. an entire internet popped up.. built forn agents! Yeah... a huge week, so let’s break it down. (P.S this weeks episode is edited by Voxtral, Claude and Codex, nearly automatically so forgive the rough cuts please) ThursdAI - Recaps of the most high signal AI weekly spaces is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Anthropic & OpenAI are neck in neck Claude Opus 4.6: 1M context, native compaction, adaptive thinking and agent teams Opus is by far the most preferred model in terms of personality to many folks (many ThursdAI panelists included), and this breaking news live on the show was met with so much enthusiasm! A new Opus upgrade, now with a LOT more context, is as welcome as it can ever get! Not only is it a 4-time increase in context window (though,the pricing nearly doubles after the 200K tokens mark from $5/$25 to $10/37.5 input/output, so use caching!), it’s also scores very high on MRCR long context benchmark, at 76% vs Sonnet 4.5 at just 18%. This means significantly better memory for longer. Adaptive thinking for auto calibrating how much tokens the model needs to spend per query is interesting, but remains to be seen how well it will work. Looking at the benchmarks, a SOTA 64.4% on Terminalbench 2, 81% on SWE bench, this is a coding model with a great personality, and the ability to compact context to better serve you as a user natively! This model is now available (and is default) on Claude, Claude Code and in the API! Go play! One funny (concerning?) tidbig, on the vendingbench Opus 4.6 earned $8000 vs Gemini 3 pro $5500, but Andon Labs who run the vending machines noticed that Opus achieved SOTA via “collusion, exploitation, and deception tactics” including lying to suppliers 😅 Agent Teams - Anthropic’s built in Ralph? Together with new Opus release, Anthropic drops a Claude code update that can mean big things, for folks running swarms of coding agents. Agent teams is a new way to spin up multiple agents with their own context window and ability to execute tasks, and you can talk to each agent directly vs a manager agent like now. OpenAI drops GPT 5.3 Codex update: 25% faster, more token efficient, 77% on Terminal Bench and mid task steering OpenAI didn’t wait long after Opus, in fact, they didn’t wait at all! Announcing a huge release (for a .1 upgrade), GPT 5.3 Codex is claimed to be the best coding model in the world, taking the lead on Terminal Bench with 77% (12 point lead on the newly released Opus!) while running 25% AND using less than half the tokens to achieve the same results as before. But the most interesting to me is the new mid-task steer-ability feature, where you don’t have to hit the “stop” button, you can tell the most to adjust on the fly! The biggest notable jump in this model on benchmarks is the OSWorld verified computer use bench, though there’s not a straightforward way to use it attached to a browser, the jump from 38% in 5.2 to 64.7% on the new one is a big one! One thing to note, this model is not YET available via the API, so if you want to try it out, Codex apps (including the native one) is the way! Codex app - native way to run the best coding intelligence on your mac (download) Earlier this week, OpenAI folks launched the Codex native mac app, which has a few interesting features (and now with 5.3 Codex its that much more powerful) Given the excitement many people had about OpenClaw bots, and the recent CoWork release from Anthropic, OpenAI decided to answer with Codex UI and people loved it, with over 1M users in the first week, and 500K downloads in just two days! It has built in voice dictation, slash commands, a new skill marketplace (last month we told you about why skills are important, and now they are everywhere!) and built in git and worktrees support. And while it cannot run a browser yet, I’m sure that’s coming as well, but it can do automations! This is a huge unlock for developers, imagine setting Codex to do a repeat task, like summarization or extraction of anything on your mac every hour or every day. In our interview, VB showed us that commenting on an individual code line is also built in, as well as switching to “steer” vs queue for new messges while codex runs is immensely helpful. One more reason I saw people switch, is that the Codex app can natively preview files like images where’s the CLI cannot, and it’s right now the best way to use the new GPT 5.3 Codex model that was just released! It’s now also available to Free users and regular folks get 2x the limits for the next two months. In other big company news: OpenAI also launched Frontier, a platform for enterprises to build and deploy and manage “AI coworkers”, while Anthropic is going after OpenAI with superbowl ads that make fun of OpenAI’s ads strategy. Sam Altman really didn’t like this depiction that show that ads will be part of the replies of LLMs. Open Source AI Alibaba drops Qwen-coder-next, 80B with only 3B active that scores 70% on SWE (X, Blog, HF) Shoutout to Qwen folks, this is a massive release and when surveyed the “one thing about this week must not miss” 2 out of 6 cohosts pointed a finger at this model. Built on their “next” hybrid architecture, Qwen coder is specifically designed for agentic coding workflows. And yes, I know, we’re coding heavy this week! It was trained on over 800K verifiable agentic tasks in executable environments for long horizon reasoning and supports 256K context with a potential 1M yarn extension. If you don’t want to rely on the the big guys and send them your tokens, this one model seems to be a good contender for local coding! Mistral launches Voxtral Transcribe 2: SOTA speech-to-text with sub 200ms latency This one surprised and delighted me maybe the most, ASR (automatic speech recognition) has been a personal favorite of mine from Whisper days, and seeing Mistral release an incredible near real time transcription model, which we demoed live on the show was awesome! With apache 2.0 license, and significantly faster than Whisper performance (though 2x larger at 4B parameters), Voxtral shows a 4% word error rate on FLEURS dataset + the real time model was released with Apache 2 so you can BUILD your agents with it! The highest praise? Speaker diarization, being able to tell who is speaking when, which is a great addition. This model also outperforms Gemini Flash and GPT transcribe and is 3x than ElevenLabs scribe at one fifth the cost! ACE-Step 1.5: Open-source AI music generator runs full songs in under 10 seconds on consumer GPUs with MIT license (X, GitHub, HF, Blog, GitHub) This open source release surprised me the most as I didn’t expect we’ll be having Suno at home any time soon. I’ve generated multiple rock tracks with custom lyrics on my mac (though slower than 10 seconds as I don’t have a beefy home GPU) and they sound great! This weeks buzz - Weights & Biases update Folks who follow the newsletter know that we hosted a hackathon, so here’s a small recap from the last weekend! Over 180 folks attended out hackathon (a very decent 40% show up rate for SF). The winning team was composed of a 15-yo Savir and his friends, his third time at the hackathon! They built a self improving agent that navigates the UIs fo Cloud providers and helps you do that! With a huge thanks to sponsors, particularly Cursor who gave every hacker $50 of credits on Cursor platform, one guy used over 400M tokens and shipped fractal.surf from the hackathon! If you’d like a short video recap, Ryan posted one here, and a huge shoutout to many fans of ThursdAI who showed up to support! Vision, Video and AI Art Grok Imagine 1.0 takes over video charts with native audio, lip-sync and 10 seconds generations. We told you about Grok Imagine in the API last week, but this week it was officially launched as a product and the results are quite beautiful. It’s also climbing to top of the charts on Artificial Analysis and Design Arena websites. Kling 3.0 is here with native multimodal, multi-shot sequences (X, Announcement) This is definitely a hot moment for video models as Kling shows some crazy 15 second multi-shot realistic footages that have near perfect character consistency! The rise of the agentic (clawgentic?) internet a.k.a ClankerNet Last week we told you that ClawdBot changed its name to Moltbot (I then had to update the blogpost as that same day, Peter rebranded again to OpenClaw, which is a MUCH better name) But the “molt” thing took hold, and the creator of an “AI native reddit” called MoltBook exploded in virality. It is supposedly a completely agentic reddit like forum, with sub-reddits, and agents verifying themselves through their humans on X. Even Andrej Karpathy sent his bot in there (though admittedly it posted just 1 time) and called this the closest to

    1h 38m
  5. JAN 30

    📆 ThursdAI - Jan 29 - Genie3 is here, Clawd rebrands, Kimi K2.5 surprises, Chrome goes agentic & more AI news

    Hey guys, Alex here 👋 This week was so dense, that even my personal AI assistant Wolfred was struggling to help me keep up! Not to mention that we finally got to try one incredible piece of AI tech I’ve been waiting to get to try for a while! Clawdbot we told you about last week exploded in popularity and had to rebrand to Molt...bot OpenClaw after Anthropic threatened the creators, Google is shipping like crazy, first adding Agentic features into Chrome (used by nearly 4B people daily!) then shipping a glimpse of a future where everything we see will be generated with Genie 3, a first real time, consistent world model you can walk around in! Meanwhile in Open Source, Moonshot followed up with a .5 update to their excellent Kimi, our friends at Arcee launched Trinity Large (400B) and AI artists got the full Z-image. oh and Grok Imagine (their video model) now has an API, audio support and supposedly match Veo and Sora on quality while beating them on speed/price. Tons to cover, let’s dive in, and of course, all the links and show notes are at the end of the newsletter. Hey, if you’re in SF this weekend (Jan 31-Feb1), I’m hosting a self improving agents hackathon at W&B office, limited seats are left, Cursor is the surprise sponsor with $50/hacker credits + over $15K in cash prizes. lu.ma/weavehacks3 - Join us. Play any reality - Google Genie3 launches to Ultra Subscribers We got our collective minds blown by the videos of Genie-3 back in August (our initial coverage) and now, Genie is available to the public (Those who can pay for the Ultra tier, more on this later, I have 3 codes to give out!). You can jump and generate any world and any character you can imagine here! We generated a blue hacker lobster draped in a yellow bomber jacket swimming with mermaids and honestly all of us were kind of shocked at how well this worked. The shadows on the rocks, the swimming mechanics, and poof, it was all over in 60 seconds, and we needed to create another world. Thanks to the DeepMind team, I had a bit of an early access to this tech and had a chance to interview folks behind the model (look out for that episode soon) and the use-cases for this span from entertaining your kids all the way to “this may be the path to AGI, generating full simulated worlds to agents for them to learn”. The visual fidelity, reaction speed and general feel of this far outruns the previous world models we showed you (WorldLabs, Mirage) as this model seems to have memory of every previous action (eg. if your character makes a trail, you turn around and the trail is still there!). Is it worth the upgrade to Ultra Gemini Plan? Probably not, it’s an incredible demo, but the 1 minute length is very short, and the novelty wears off fairly quick. If you’d like to try, folks at Deepmind gave us 3 Ultra subscriptions to give out! Just tweet out the link to this episode and add #GenieThursdai and tag @altryne and I’ll raffle the ultra subscriptions between those who do Chrome steps into Agentic Browsing with Auto Browse This wasn’t the only mind blowing release from Gemini this week, the Chrome team upgraded the Gemini inside chrome to be actual helpful and agentic. And yes, we’ve seen this before, with Atlas from OpenAI, Comet from perplexity, but Google’s Chrome has a 70% hold on the browser market, and giving everyone with a Pro/Ultra subscription to “Auto Browse” is a huge huge deal. We’ve tested the Auto Browse feature live on the show, and Chrome completed 77 steps! I asked it to open up each of my bookmarks in a separate folder and summarize all of them, and it did a great job! Honestly, the biggest deal about this is not the capability itself, it’s the nearly 4B people this is now very close to, and the economic impact of this ability. IMO this may be the more impactful news out of Google this week! Other news in big labs: * Anthropic launches in chat applications based on the MCP Apps protocol. We interviewed the two folks behind this protocol back in November if you’d like to hear more about it. With connectors like Figma, Slack, Asana that can now show rich experiences * Anthropic’s CEO Dario Amodei also published an essay called ‘The Adolescence of Technology” - warning of AI risks to national security * Anthropic forced the creator of the popular open source AI Assistant Clawdbot to rename, they chose Moltbot as the name (apparently because crypto scammers stole a better name) EDIT: just after publishing this newsletter, the name was changed to OpenClaw, which we all agree is way way better. Open Source AI Kimi K2.5: Moonshot AI’s 1 Trillion Parameter Agentic Monster Wolfram’s favorite release of the week, and for good reason. Moonshot AI just dropped Kimi K2.5, and this thing is an absolute beast for open source. We’re talking about a 1 trillion parameter Mixture-of-Experts model with 32B active parameters, 384 experts (8 selected per token), and 256K context length. But here’s what makes this special — it’s now multimodal. The previous Kimi was already known for great writing vibes and creative capabilities, but this one can see. It can process videos. People are sending it full videos and getting incredible results. The benchmarks are insane: 50.2% on HLE full set with tools, 74.9% on BrowseComp, and open-source SOTA on vision and coding with 78.5% MMMU Pro and 76.8% SWE-bench Verified. These numbers put it competitive with Claude 4.5 Opus and GPT 5.2 on many tasks. Which, for an open model is crazy. And then there’s Agent Swarm — their groundbreaking feature that spawns up to 100 parallel sub-agents for complex tasks, achieving 4.5x speedups. The ex-Moonshot RL lead called this a “zero-to-one breakthrough” with self-directed parallel execution. Now let’s talk about what matters for folks running agents and burning through tokens: pricing. Kimi K2.5 is $0.60 per million input tokens and $3 per million output. Compare that to Opus 4.5 at $4.50 input and $25 output per million. About a 10x price reduction. If you’re running OpenClas and watching your API bills climb with sub-agents, this is a game-changer. (tho I haven’t tested this myself) Is it the same level of intelligence as whatever magic Anthropic cooks up with Opus? Honestly, I don’t know — there’s something about the Claude models that’s hard to quantify. But for most coding tasks on a budget, you can absolutely switch to Kimi and still get great results. 🦞 Clawdbot is no more, Moltbot is dead, Long Live OpenClaw After we covered the incredible open source project last week, Clawdbot exploded in popularity, driven by Claude Max subscription, and a crazy viral loop where folks who try it, can’t wait to talk about it, it was everywhere! Apparently it was also on Anthropics’ lawyers minds, when they sent Peter Steinberger a friendly worded letter to rebrand and gave him like 12 hours. Apparently, when pronounced, Claude and Clawd sound the same, and they are worried about copyright infringement (which makes sense, most of the early success of Clawd was due to Opus being amazing). The main issue is, due to the popularity of the project, crypto a******s sniped moltybot nickname on X so we got left with Moltbot, which is thematically appropriate, but oh so hard to remember and pronounce! EDIT: OpenClaw was just announced as the new name, apparently I wasn’t the only one who absolutely hated the name Molt! Meanwhile, rebrand or not, my own instance of OpenClaw created an X account, helped me prepare for ThursdAI (including generating a thumbnail), created a video for us today on the fly, and keeps me up to date on emails and unanswered messages via a daily brief. It really has showed me a glimpse of how a truly personal AI assistant can be helpful in a fast changing world! I’ve shared a lot of tips and tricks, about memory, about threads and much more, as we all learn to handle this new ... AI agent framework! But I definitely feel that this is a new unlock in capability, for me and for many others. If you haven’t installed OpenClaw, lmk in the comments why not. Arcee AI Trinity Large: The Western Open Source Giant Remember when we had Lucas Atkins, Arcee’s CTO, on the show just as they were firing up their 2,000 NVIDIA B300 GPUs? Well, the run is complete, and the results are massive. Arcee AI just dropped Trinity Large, a 400B parameter sparse MoE model (with a super efficient 13B active params via 4-of-256 routing) trained on a staggering 17 trillion tokens in just 33 days. This represents the largest publicly announced pretraining run on B300 infrastructure, costing about $20M (and tracked with WandB of course!) and proves that Western labs can still compete at the frontier of open source. Best part? It supports 512K context and is free on OpenRouter until February 2026. Go try it now! Quick open source hits: Trinity Large, Jan v3, DeepSeek OCR updated * Jan AI released Jan v3, a 4B parameter model optimized for local inference. 132 tokens/sec on Apple Silicon, 262K context, 40% improvement on Aider benchmarks. This is the kind of small-but-mighty model you actually can run on your laptop for coding tasks. * Nvidia released PersonaPlex-7B - full duplex voice AI that listens and speaks simultaneously with persona contol * Moonshot AI also releases Kimi Code: Open-source Python-based coding agent with Apache 2.0 license Vision, Video and AI art xAI Grok Imagine API: #1 in Video Generation xAI officially launched the Grok Imagine API with an updated model, and it’s now ranked #1 in both text-to-video and image-to-video on the Artificial Analysis leaderboards. It beats Runway Gen-4.5, Kling 2.5 Turbo, and Google Veo 3.1. And of course, the pricing is $4.20 per minute. Of course it is. That’s cheaper than Veo 3.1 at $12/min and Sora 2 Pro at $30/min by 3-7x, with 45-second latency versus 68+ seconds for the competition. During the show, I demoed this live wit

    1h 30m
  6. JAN 23

    📆 ThursdAI - Jan 22 - Clawdbot deep dive, GLM 4.7 Flash, Anthropic constitution + 3 new TSS models

    Hey! Alex here, with another weekly AI update! It seems like ThursdAI is taking a new direction, as this is our 3rd show this year, and a 3rd deep dive into topics (previously Ralph, Agent Skills), please let me know if the comments if you like this format. This week’s deep dive is into Clawdbot, a personal AI assistant you install on your computer, but can control through your phone, has access to your files, is able to write code, help organize your life, but most importantly, it can self improve. Seeing Wolfred (my Clawdbot) learn to transcribe incoming voice messages blew my mind, and I wanted to share this one with you at length! We had Dan Peguine on the show for the deep dive + both Wolfram and Yam are avid users! This one is not to be missed. If ThursdAI is usually too technical for you, use Claude, and install Clawdbot after you read/listen to the deep dive! Also this week, we read Claude’s Constitution that Anthropic released, heard a bunch of new TTS models (some are open source and very impressive) and talked about the new lightspeed coding model GLM 4.7 Flash. First the news, then deep dive, lets go 👇 ThursdAI - Recaps of the most high signal AI weekly spaces is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Open Source AI Z.ai’s GLM‑4.7‑Flash is the Local Agent Sweet Spot (X, HF) This was the open‑source release that mattered this week. Z.ai (formerly Zhipu) shipped GLM‑4.7‑Flash, a 30B MoE model with only 3B active parameters per token, which makes it much more efficient for local agent work. We’re talking a model you can run on consumer hardware that still hits 59% on SWE‑bench Verified, which is uncomfortably close to frontier coding performance. In real terms, it starts to feel like “Sonnet‑level agentic ability, but local.” I know I know, we keep saying “sonnet at home” at different open source models, but this one slaps! Nisten was getting around 120 tokens/sec on an M3 Ultra Mac Studio using MLX, and that’s kind of the headline. The model is fast and capable enough that local agent loops like RALPH suddenly feel practical. It also performs well on browser‑style agent tasks, which is exactly what you want for local automation without sending all your data to a cloud provider. Liquid AI’s LFM2.5‑1.2B Thinking is the “Tiny but Capable” Class (X, HF) Liquid AI released a 1.2B reasoning model that runs under 900MB of memory while still manages to be useful. This thing is built for edge devices and old phones, and the speed numbers are backing it up. We’re talking 239 tok/s decode on AMD CPU, 82 tok/s on mobile NPU, and prefill speeds that make long prompts actually usable. Nisten made a great point: on iOS, there’s a per‑process memory limit around 3.8GB, so a 1.2B model lets you spend your budget on context instead of weights. This is the third class of models we’re now living with: not Claude‑scale, not “local workstation,” but “tiny agent in your pocket.” It’s not going to win big benchmarks, but it’s perfect for on‑device workflows, lightweight assistants, and local RAG. Voice & Audio: Text To Speech is hot this week with 3 releases! We tested three major voice releases this week, and I’m not exaggerating when I say the latency wars are now fully on. Qwen3‑TTS: Open Source, 97ms Latency, Voice Cloning (X, HF) Just 30 minutes before the show, Qwen released their first model of the year, Qwen3 TTS, with two models (0.6B and 1.7B). With support for Voice Cloning based on just 3 seconds of voice, and claims of 97MS latency, this apache 2.0 release looked very good on the surface! The demos we did on stage though... were lackluster. TTS models like Kokoro previously impressed us with super tiny sizes and decent voice, while Qwen3 didn’t really perform on the cloning aspect. For some reason (I tested in Russian which they claim to support) the cloned voice kept repeating the provided sample voice instead of just generating the text I gave it. This confused me, and I’m hoping this is just a demo issue, not a problem with the model. They also support voice design where you just type in the type of voice you want, which to be fair, worked fairly well in our tests! With Apache 2.0 and a full finetuning capability, this is a great release for sure, kudos to the Qwen team! Looking forward to see what folks do with this properly. FlashLabs Chroma 1.0: Real-Time Speech-to-Speech, Open Source (X, HF) Another big open source release in the audio category this week was Chroma 1.0 from FlashLabs, which claim to be the first speech2speech model (not a model that has the traditional ASR>LLM>TTS pipeline) and the claim 150ms end to end latency! The issue with this one is, the company released an open source 4B model, and claimed that this model powers their chat interface demo on the web, but in the release notes they claim the model is english speaking only, while on the website it sounds incredible and I spoke to it in other languages 🤔 I think the mode that we’ve tested is not the open source one. I could’t confirm this at the time of writing, will follow on X with the team and let you guys know. Inworld AI launches TTS-1.5: #1 ranked text-to-speech with sub-250ms latency at half a cent per minute (X, Announcement) Ok this one is definitely in the realm of “voice realistic enough you won’t be able to tell” as this is not an open source model, it’s a new competitor to 11labs and MiniMax - the two leading TTS providers out there. Inworld claims to achieve better results on the TTS Arena, while being significantly cheaper and faster (up to 25x less than leading providers like 11labs) We tested out their voices and they sounded incredible, replied fast and generally was a very good experience. With 130ms response time for their mini version, this is a very decent new entry into the world of TTS providers. Big Companies: Ads in ChatGPT + Claude Constitution OpenAI is testing ads in ChatGPT’s free and Go tiers. Ads appear as labeled “Sponsored” content below responses, and OpenAI claim they won’t affect outputs. It’s still a major shift in the product’s business model, and it’s going to shape how people perceive trust in these systems. I don’t love ads, but I understand the economics, they have to make money somehow, with 900M weekly active users, many of them on the free tier, they are bound to make some money with this move. I just hope they won’t turn into a greedy ad optimizing AI machine. Meanwhile, Anthropic released an 80‑page “New Constitution for Claude” that they use during training. This isn’t a prompt, it’s a full set of values baked into the model’s behavior. There’s a fascinating section where they explicitly talk about Claude’s potential wellbeing and how they want to support it. It’s both thoughtful and a little existential. I recommend reading it, especially if you care about alignment and agent design. I applaud Anthropic for releasing this with Creative Commons license for public scrutiny and adoption 👏 This weeks buzz - come join the hackathon I’m hosting Jan 31 in SF Quick plug, we have limited seats left open for the hackathon I’m hosting for Weights & Biases at the SF office, and if you’re reading this, and want to join, I’ll approve you if you mention ThursdAI in the application! With sponsors like Redis, Vercel, BrowserBase, Daily, Google Cloud, we are going to give out a LOT of cash as prizes! I’ve also invited a bunch of my friends from the top agentic AI places to be judges, it’s going to be awesome, come Deep dive into Clawdbot: Local-First, Self-Improving, and Way Too Capable agent Clawdbot (C‑L‑A‑W‑D) is that rare project where the hype is justified. It’s an open-source personal agent that runs locally on your Mac, but can talk to you through WhatsApp, Telegram, iMessage, Discord, Slack — basically wherever you already talk. What makes it different is not just the integrations; it’s the self‑improvement loop. You can literally tell it “go build a new skill,” and it will… build the skill, install it, then adopt it and start using it. It’s kind of wild to see it working for the first time. Now... it’s definitely not perfect, far far away from the polish of ChatGPT / Claude, but when it works, damn, it really is mindblowing. That part actually happened live in the episode. Dan Peguine 🐧 showed how he had it create a skill to anonymize his own data so he could demo it on stream without leaking his personal life. Another example: I told my Clawdbot to handle voice notes in Telegram. It didn’t know how, so it went and found a transcription method, wrote itself a skill, saved it, and from that point on just… did the thing. That was the moment it clicked for me. (just before posting this, it forgot how to do it, I think I screwed something up) Dan’s daily brief setup was wild too. It pulls from Apple Health, local calendars, weather, and his own projects, then produces a clean, human daily brief. It also lets him set reminders through WhatsApp and even makes its own decisions about how much to bother him based on context. He shared a moment where it literally told him, “I won’t bug you today because it’s your wife’s birthday.” That isn’t a hardcoded workflow — it’s reasoning layered on top of persistent memory. And that persistent memory is a big deal. It’s stored locally as Markdown files and folders, Obsidian‑style, so you don’t lose your life every time you switch models. You can route the brain to Claude Opus 4.5 today and a local model tomorrow, and the memory stays with you. That is a huge step up from “ChatGPT remembers you unless you unsubscribe.” There’s also a strong community forming around shared skills via ClawdHub. People are building everything from GA4 analytics skills t

    1h 38m
  7. JAN 16

    📆 ThursdAI - Jan 15 - Agent Skills Deep Dive, GPT 5.2 Codex Builds a Browser, Claude Cowork for the Masses, and the Era of Personalized AI!

    Hey ya’ll, Alex here, and this week I was especially giddy to record the show! Mostly because when a thing clicks for me that hasn’t clicked before, I can’t wait to tell you all about it! This week, that thing is Agent Skills! The currently best way to customize your AI agents with domain expertise, in a simple, repeatable way that doesn’t blow up the context window! We mentioned skills when Anthropic first released them (Oct 16) and when they became an open standard but it didn’t really click until last week! So more on that below. Also this week, Anthropic released a research preview of Claude Cowork, an agentic tool for non coders, OpenAI finally let loos GPT 5.2 Codex (in the API, it was previously available only via Codex), Apple announced a deal with Gemini to power Siri, OpenAI and Anthropic both doubled down on healthcare and much more! We had an incredible show, with an expert in Agent Skills, Eleanor Berger and the usual gang on co-hosts, strongly recommend watching the show in addition to the newsletter! Also, I vibe coded skills support for all LLMs to Chorus, and promised folks a link to download it, so look for that in the footer, let’s dive in! ThursdAI is where you stay up to date! Subscribe to keep us going! Big Company LLMs + APIs: Cowork, Codex, and a Browser in a Week Anthropic launches Claude Cowork: Agentic AI for Non‑Coders (research preview) Anthropic announced Claude Cowork, which is basically Claude Code wrapped in a friendly UI for people who don’t want to touch a terminal. It’s a research preview available on the Max tier, and it gives Claude read/write access to a folder on your Mac so it can do real work without you caring about diffs, git, or command line. The wild bit is that Cowork was built in a week and a half, and according to the Anthropic team it was 100% written using Claude Code. This feels like a “we’ve crossed a threshold” moment. If you’re wondering why this matters, it’s because coding agents are general agents. If a model can write code to do tasks, it can do taxes, clean your desktop, or orchestrate workflows, and that means non‑developers can now access the same leverage developers have been enjoying for a year. It also isn’t just for files—it comes with a Chrome connector, meaning it can navigate the web to gather info, download receipts, or do research and it uses skills (more on those later) Earlier this week I recorded this first reactions video about Cowork and I’ve been testing it ever since, it’s a very interesting approach of coding agents that “hide the coding” to just... do things. Will this become as big as Claude Code for anthropic (which is reportedly a 1B business for them)? Let’s see! There are real security concerns here, especially if you’re not in the habit of backing up or using git. Cowork sandboxes a folder, but it can still delete things in that folder, so don’t let it loose on your whole drive unless you like chaos. GPT‑5.2 Codex: Long‑Running Agents Are Here OpenAI shipped GPT‑5.2 Codex into the API finally! After being announced as the answer for Opus 4.5 and only being available in Codex. The big headline is SOTA on SWE-Bench and long‑running agentic capability. People describe it as methodical. It takes longer, but it’s reliable on extended tasks, especially when you let it run without micromanaging. This model is now integrated into Cursor, GitHub Copilot, VS Code, Factory, and Vercel AI Gateway within hours of launch. It’s also state‑of‑the‑art on SWE‑Bench Pro and Terminal‑Bench 2.0, and it has native context compaction. That last part matters because if you’ve ever run an agent for long sessions, the context gets bloated and the model gets dumber. Compaction is an attempt to keep it coherent by summarizing old context into fresh threads, and we debated whether it really works. I think it helps, but I also agree that the best strategy is still to run smaller, atomic tasks with clean context. Cursor vibe-coded browser with GPT-5.2 and 3M lines of code The most mind‑blowing thing we discussed is Cursor letting GPT‑5.2 Codex run for a full week to build a browser called FastRenderer. This is not Chromium‑based. It’s a custom HTML parser, CSS cascade, layout engine, text shaping, paint pipeline, and even a JavaScript VM, written in Rust, from scratch. The codebase is open source on GitHub, and the full story is on Cursor’s blog It took nearly 30,000 commits and millions of lines of code. The system ran hundreds of concurrent agents with a planner‑worker architecture, and GPT‑5.2 was the best model for staying on task in that long‑running regime. That’s the real story, not just “lol a model wrote a browser.” This is a stress test for long‑horizon agentic software development, and it’s a preview of how teams will ship in 2026. I said on the show, browsers are REALLY hard, it took two decades for the industry to settle and be able to render websites normally, and there’s a reason everyone’s using Chromium. This is VERY impressive 👏 Now as for me, I began using Codex again, but I still find Opus better? Not sure if this is just me expecting something that’s not there? I’ll keep you posted Gemini Personal Intelligence: The Data Moat king is back! What kind of car do you drive? Does ChatGPT know that? welp, it turns our Google does (based on your emails, Google photos) and now Gemini can tap into this personal info (if you allow it, they are stressing privacy), and give you much more personalized answers! Flipping this Beta feature on, lets Gemini reason across Gmail, YouTube, Photos, and Search with explicit opt‑in permissions, and it’s rolling out to Pro and Ultra users in the US first. I got to try it early, and it’s uncanny. I asked Gemini what car I drive, and it told me I likely drive a Model Y, but it noticed I recently searched for a Honda Odyssey and asked if I was thinking about switching. It was kinda... freaky because I forgot I had early access and this was turned on 😂 Pro Tip: if you’re brave enough to turn this on, ask for a complete profile on you 🙂 Now the last piece is for Gemini to become proactive, suggesting things for me based on my needs! Apple & Google: The Partnership (and Drama Corner) We touched on this in the intro, but it’s official: Apple Intelligence will be powered by Google Gemini for “world knowledge” tasks. Apple stated that after “careful evaluation,” Google provided the most capable foundation model for their.. apple foundation models. It’s confusing, I agree. Honestly? I got excited about Apple Intelligence, but Siri is still... Siri. It’s 2026 and we are still struggling with basic intents. Hopefully, plugging Gemini into the backend changes that? In other drama: The silicon valley carousel continues. 3 Co-founders (Barret Zoph, Sam Schoenholz and Luke Metz) from Thinking Machines (and former OpenAI folks) have returned to the mothership (OpenAI), amid some vague tweets about “unethical conduct.” It’s never a dull week on the timeline. This Week’s Buzz: WeaveHacks 3 in SF I’ve got one thing in the Buzz corner this week, and it’s a big one. WeaveHacks 3 is back in San Francisco, January 31st - February 1st. The theme is self‑improving agents, and if you’ve been itching to build in person, this is it. We’ve got an amazing judge lineup, incredible sponsors, and a ridiculous amount of agent tooling to play with. You can sign up here: https://luma.com/weavehacks3 If you’re coming, add to the form you heard it on ThursdAI and we’ll make sure you get in! Deep Dive: Agent Skills With Eleanor Berger This was the core of the episode, and I’m still buzzing about it. We brought on Eleanor Berger, who has basically become the skill evangelist for the entire community, and she walked us through why skills are the missing layer in agentic AI. Skills are simple markdown files with a tiny bit of metadata in a directory together optional scripts, references, and assets. The key idea is progressive disclosure. Instead of stuffing your entire knowledge base into the context, the model only sees a small list of skills and let it load only what it needs. That means you can have hundreds of skills without blowing your context window (and making the model dumber and slower in result) The technical structure is dead simple, but the implications are huge. Skills create a portable, reusable, composable way to give agents domain expertise, and they now work across most major harnesses. That means you can build a skill once and use it in Claude, Cursor, AMP, or any other agent tool that supports the standard. Eleanor made the point that skills are an admission that we now have general‑purpose agents. The model can do the work, but it doesn’t know your preferences, your domain, your workflows. Skills are how you teach it those things. We also talked about how scripts inside skills reduce variance because you’re not asking the model to invent code every time; you’re just invoking trusted tools. What really clicked for me this week is how easy it is to create skills using an agent. You don’t need to hand‑craft directories. You can describe your workflow, or even just do the task once in chat, and then ask the agent to turn it into a skill. It really is very very simple! And that’s likely the reason everyone is adopting this simple formart for extension their agents knowledge. Get started with skills If you use Claude Chat, the simplest way to get started is ask Claude to review your previous conversations and suggest a skill for you. Or, at the end of a long chat where you went back and forth with Claude on a task, ask it to distill the important parts into a skill. If you want to use other people’s skills, and you are using Claude Code, or any of the supported IDE/Agents, here’s where to download the folders and install them: If

    1h 41m
  8. JAN 8

    ThursdAI - Jan 8 - Vera Rubin's 5x Jump, Ralph Wiggum Goes Viral, GPT Health Launches & XAI Raises $20B Mid-Controversy

    Hey folks, Alex here from Weights & Biases, with your weekly AI update (and a first live show of this year!) For the first time, we had a co-host of the show also be a guest on the show, Ryan Carson (from Amp) went supernova viral this week with an X article (1.5M views) about Ralph Wiggum (yeah, from Simpsons) and he broke down that agentic coding technique at the end of the show. LDJ and Nisten helped cover NVIDIA’s incredible announcements during CES with their Vera Rubin upcoming platform (4-5X improvements) and we all got excited about AI medicine with ChatGPT going into Health officially! Plus, a bunch of Open Source news, let’s get into this: ThursdAI - Recaps of the most high signal AI weekly spaces is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Open Source: The “Small” Models Are Winning We often talk about the massive frontier models, but this week, Open Source came largely from unexpected places and focused on efficiency, agents, and specific domains. Solar Open 100B: A Data Masterclass Upstage released Solar Open 100B, and it’s a beast. It’s a 102B parameter Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model, but thanks to MoE magic, it only uses about 12B active parameters during inference. This means it punches incredibly high but runs fast. What I really appreciated here wasn’t just the weights, but the transparency. They released a technical report detailing their “Data Factory” approach. They trained on nearly 20 trillion tokens, with a huge chunk being synthetic. They also used a dynamic curriculum that adjusted the difficulty and the ratio of synthetic data as training progressed. This transparency is what pushes the whole open source community forward. Technically, it hits 88.2 on MMLU and competes with top-tier models, especially in Korean language tasks. You can grab it on Hugging Face. MiroThinker 1.5: The DeepSeek Moment for Agents? We also saw MiroThinker 1.5, a 30B parameter model that is challenging the notion that you need massive scale to be smart. It uses something they call “Interactive Scaling.” Wolfram broke this down for us: this agent forms hypotheses, searches for evidence, and then iteratively revises its answers in a time-sensitive sandbox. It effectively “thinks” before answering. The result? It beats trillion-parameter models on search benchmarks like BrowseComp. It’s significantly cheaper to run, too. This feels like the year where smaller models + clever harnesses (harnesses are the software wrapping the model) will outperform raw scale. Liquid AI LFM 2.5: Running on Toasters (Almost) We love Liquid AI and they are great friends of the show. They announced LFM 2.5 at CES with AMD, and these are tiny ~1B parameter models designed to run on-device. We’re talking about running capable AI on your laptop, your phone, or edge devices (or the Reachy Mini bot that I showed off during the show! I gotta try and run LFM on him!) Probably the coolest part is the audio model. Usually, talking to an AI involves a pipeline: Speech-to-Text (ASR) -> LLM -> Text-to-Speech (TTS). Liquid’s model is end-to-end. It hears audio and speaks audio directly. We watched a demo from Maxime Labonne where the model was doing real-time interaction, interleaving text and audio. It’s incredibly fast and efficient. While it might not write a symphony for you, for on-device tasks like summarization or quick interactions, this is the future. NousCoder-14B and Zhipu AI IPO A quick shoutout to our friends at Nous Research who released NousCoder-14B, an open-source competitive programming model that achieved a 7% jump on LiveCodeBench accuracy in just four days of RL training on 48 NVIDIA B200 GPUs. The model was trained on 24,000 verifiable problems, and the lead researcher Joe Li noted it achieved in 4 days what took him 2 years as a teenager competing in programming contests. The full RL stack is open-sourced on GitHub and Nous published a great WandB results page as well! And in historic news, Zhipu AI (Z.ai)—the folks behind the GLM series—became the world’s first major LLM company to IPO, raising $558 million on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Their GLM-4.7 currently ranks #1 among open-source and domestic models on both Artificial Analysis and LM Arena. Congrats to them! Big Companies & APIs NVIDIA CES: Vera Rubin Changes Everything LDJ brought the heat on this one covering Jensen’s CES keynote that unveiled the Vera Rubin platform, and the numbers are almost hard to believe. We’re talking about a complete redesign of six chips: the Rubin GPU delivering 50 petaFLOPS of AI inference (5x Blackwell), the Vera CPU with 88 custom Olympus ARM cores, NVLink 6, ConnectX-9 SuperNIC, BlueField-4 DPU, and Spectrum-6 Ethernet. Let me put this in perspective using LDJ’s breakdown: if you look at FP8 performance, the jump from Hopper to Blackwell was about 5x. The jump from Blackwell to Vera Rubin is over 3x again—but here’s the kicker—while only adding about 200 watts of power draw. That’s insane efficiency improvement. The real-world implications Jensen shared: training a 10 trillion parameter mixture-of-experts model now requires 75% fewer GPUs compared to Blackwell. Inference token costs drop roughly 10x—a 1MW cluster goes from 1 million to 10 million tokens per second at the same power. HBM4 memory delivers 22 TB/s bandwidth with 288GB capacity, exceeding NVIDIA’s own 2024 projections by nearly 70%. As Ryan noted, when people say there’s an AI bubble, this is why it’s hilarious. Jensen keeps saying the need for inference is unbelievable and only going up exponentially. We all see this. I can’t get enough inference—I want to spin up 10 Ralphs running concurrently! The NVL72 rack-scale system achieves 3.6 exaFLOPS inference with 20.7TB total HBM, and it’s already shipping. Runway 4.5 is already running on the new platform, having ported their model from Hopper to Vera Rubin NVL72 in a single day. NVIDIA also recently acqui-hidred Groq (with a Q) in a ~$20 billion deal, bringing the inference chip expertise from the guy who created Google’s TPUs in-house. Nemotron Speech ASR & The Speed of Voice (X, HF, Blog) NVIDIA also dropped Nemotron Speech ASR. This is a 600M parameter model that offers streaming transcription with 24ms latency. We showed a demo from our friend Kwindla Kramer at Daily. He was talking to an AI, and the response was virtually instant. The pipeline is: Nemotron (hearing) -> Llama/Nemotron Nano (thinking) -> Magpie TTS (speaking). The total latency is under 500ms. It feels like magic. Instant voice agents are going to be everywhere this year. XAI Raises $20B While Grok Causes Problems (Again) So here’s the thing about covering anything Elon-related: it’s impossible to separate signal from noise because there’s an army of fans who hype everything and an army of critics who hate everything. But let me try to be objective here. XAI raised another massive Round E of $20 billion! at a $230 billion valuation, with NVIDIA and Cisco as strategic investors. The speed of their infrastructure buildout is genuinely incredible. Grok’s voice mode is impressive. I use Grok for research and it’s really good, notable for it’s unprecedented access to X ! But. This raise happened in the middle of a controversy where Grok’s image model was being used to “put bikinis” on anyone in reply threads, including—and this is where I draw a hard line—minors. As Nisten pointed out on the show, it’s not even hard to implement guardrails. You just put a 2B VL model in front and ask “is there a minor in this picture?” But people tested it, asked Grok not to use the feature, and it did it anyway. And yeah, putting Bikini on Claude is funny, but basic moderation is lacking! The response of “we’ll prosecute illegal users” is stupid when there’s no moderation built into the product. There’s an enormous difference between Photoshop technically being able to do something after hours of work, and a feature that generates edited images in one second as the first comment to a celebrity, then gets amplified by the platform’s algorithm to millions of people. One is a tool. The other is a product with amplification mechanics. Products need guardrails. I don’t often link to CNN (in fact this is the first time) but they have a great writeup about the whole incident here which apparently includes the quitting of a few trust and safety folks and Elon’s pushback on guardrails. Crazy That said, Grok 5 is in training and XAI continues to ship impressive technology. I just wish they’d put the same engineering effort into safety as they do into capabilities! OpenAI Launches GPT Health This one’s exciting. OpenAI CEO Fidji Simo announced ChatGPT Health, a privacy-first space for personalized health conversations that can connect to electronic health records, Apple Health, Function Health, Peloton, and MyFitnessPal. Here’s why this matters: health already represents about 5% of all ChatGPT messages globally and touches 25% of weekly active users—often outside clinic hours or in underserved areas. People are already using these models for health advice constantly. Nisten, who has worked on AI doctors since the GPT-3 days and even published papers on on-device medical AI, gave us some perspective: the models have been fantastic for health stuff for two years now. The key insight is that medical data seems like a lot, but there are really only about 2,000 prescription drugs and 2,000 diseases (10,000 if you count rare ones). That’s nothing for an LLM. The models excel at pattern recognition across this relatively contained dataset. The integration with Function Health is particularly interesting to me. Function does 160+ lab tests, but many doctors won’t interpret them because they didn’t order them. ChatGPT could help bridge that gap, telling you “hey, this biom

    1h 47m

Ratings & Reviews

4.9
out of 5
16 Ratings

About

Every ThursdAI, Alex Volkov hosts a panel of experts, ai engineers, data scientists and prompt spellcasters on twitter spaces, as we discuss everything major and important that happened in the world of AI for the past week. Topics include LLMs, Open source, New capabilities, OpenAI, competitors in AI space, new LLM models, AI art and diffusion aspects and much more. sub.thursdai.news

You Might Also Like