Screams & Streams

Chad, Mike, & Sam

What if you could get a front row seat on a journey through the best and worst horror movies of the past half-century, all rated on Rotten Tomatoes? Brace yourself for an eerie tour with your hosts, Chad Campbell, Mike Carron, and Sam Schreiner, as they dissect each film with a surgeon's precision and a fan's passion. Our story began on a mundane work day, when two colleagues, Chad and Mike, decided to start a podcast centered on their shared love for horror films. The search for a genre was a winding, convoluted exploration of possibilities, before we arrived at the chilling idea of horror films.Our journey didn’t stop there. We had to figure out where to begin, how to categorize each film, and the scale to use for our rating system. We landed on a year-by-year review of the best and the worst films, starting from 1970 - the dawn of modern horror. Our shows come packed with a variety of categories like First Impressions, Tropes Hall of Shame, One-liners, and more. We also rate each film on a watchability scale, advising if it's worth your precious time. Join us as we sometimes agree, and other times disagree with Rotten Tomatoes' ratings. So, fasten your seat belts, it's going to be a spooky ride! Head to www.screamsandstreams.com for links and information related to our episodes.

  1. Oct 10

    Ep. 142: Geoffrey Sax’s “White Noise” (2005)

    Static can be terrifying, but only if the movie knows what to do with it. We’re Chad, Mike, and Sam, and we put Jeffrey Sachs’s White Noise (2005) under the microscope after a listener recommendation and that brutal 7% Rotten Tomatoes score. The premise is pure late-night dread: electronic voice phenomena (EVP), ghostly images hidden in TV snow, and a grieving husband (Michael Keaton) who can’t stop chasing one more message from beyond the grave. We talk through why the idea of EVP horror is still genuinely creepy, then get honest about what drags this supernatural thriller down. Pacing becomes our main battleground, from montages of waiting, to endless fades to black, to camera choices that feel more distracting than tense. We also call out the movie’s biggest logic leaps, the undercooked police subplot, and the emotional fallout the film hints at but never fully earns, especially when grief turns into obsession and parenting gets pushed aside. It’s not all doom and gloom. A couple jump scares still work, the screaming face in the TV snow sticks, and the sound design can hit hard when the static blasts at just the wrong moment. We wrap up with “fright done right” picks that handle ghosts, grief, and communication-from-the-dead more effectively, then lock in our watchability ratings. If you’ve seen White Noise, come argue with us. Subscribe, share the show with your horror-loving friends, and leave a rating and review wherever you listen. What would you score it out of 10?  Head to www.screamsandstreams.com for more information related to our episode.

  2. Sep 26

    Ep. 140: Cyrus Neshvad’s "Child" (2026)

    A parent will do anything to save their child, until “anything” has a body count. We review Cyrus Nishvad’s 2026 film Child, a new release (UK cinemas October 2, with North America later) that doesn’t have a Rotten Tomatoes rating yet, and we go spoiler-heavy after a clear warning so we can talk about what really happens once the truth comes out. We start with Sam’s tight plot summary and our Sinister Sip cocktail, the Black Market Sling, then get honest about the movie’s vibe: for a long stretch, Child feels more like a slow-burn psychological thriller than a straight horror film. That choice becomes the core of our conversation, because the pacing, the secrecy between Ann and Greg, and the road-trip tension all build toward a reveal that reframes everything around illegal organ deals, human trafficking, and the horrifying logic people use to live with themselves. From there we hit our categories: Tropes Hall of Shame, the “don’t do this and the movie never happens” decisions, one-liners that land like gut punches, and the details that don’t hold up when you look too close. We also call out what truly works, from selective subtitles that keep you disoriented on purpose to the quiet, environmental sound design that makes the silence feel hostile. We wrap with our Watchability Scale, where we land at a 7 out of 10, plus the question that lingers long after the credits: what would you trade, and who pays? Subscribe, leave a review, and share this one with a friend who loves dark horror debates.  Head to www.screamsandstreams.com for more information related to our episode.

  3. Sep 19

    Ep 139: Kane Parson’s "Backrooms" (2026)

    Imagine trying to describe a dog to someone who’s never seen one, then asking them to draw it. That’s the vibe we keep coming back to while we break down Kane Parsons’ Backrooms, a liminal space horror film that’s creepy in the details, frustrating in the questions, and weirdly effective when it just lets the empty rooms breathe. We go full spoilers as we track how a missing patient pulls a therapist into a reality-bending maze that feels like found footage, internet horror lore, and psychological horror all jammed into one fluorescent-lit nightmare. We talk honestly about what worked for us and what didn’t: the slow pacing that builds tension, the stretches that feel too long, and the “mystery box” storytelling that withholds answers. Along the way we hit our usual categories, calling out tropes like flickering lights, locked doors, and the classic horror habit of investigating every sound even when every red flag is screaming to leave. We also dig into the film’s sound design, from that maddening fluorescent buzz to music that feels slightly off, like a memory playing back wrong. The ending is where we really start debating: is the final backrooms version of the therapist a memory, a copy, or the start of the space reshaping itself around her trauma the way it did with Clark? We connect that to key scenes, including the tense dinner table moment, the repeated rooms, and the sense that something bigger is watching from the edges of the story. If you like Backrooms explained theories, found footage tension, and liminal space dread, you’ll have plenty to argue with us about. Follow, share, and leave a review if you enjoy the show, and then tell us your take: do you want hard lore and clear rules, or do you prefer horror that never fully explains itself?  Head to www.screamsandstreams.com for more information related to our episode.

  4. Sep 12

    Ep. 138: Curry Barker's "Obsession" (2025)

    Love stories usually start with a spark. This one starts with a curse, a coworker crush, and a wish that should never be granted. We’re Sam, Chad, and Mike, and we’re diving into Curry Barker’s Obsession (2025), a listener pick with a jaw-dropping 94% Rotten Tomatoes score. Bear is a socially awkward music store employee who can’t risk rejection, so he reaches for a shortcut: a magical charm called a one-wish willow. When he uses it to force Nikki to love him, the film snaps from awkward longing into psychological horror, where “romance” turns into surveillance, confinement, and a steady collapse of autonomy. We talk through the moral line the movie crosses early, and why Bear feels less like a victim and more like the engine of the nightmare. From there, we get into the craft that makes Obsession so effective: Indy Navarrette’s performance, the unsettling switches in Nikki’s behavior, and the film’s smart use of shadows, silhouettes, and negative space to create fear without leaning on heavy CGI. We also hit our usual categories, including tropes, one-liners, what holds up, what doesn’t, the most gratuitous moment, and the scenes that made us laugh out loud even while we were cringing. Then we bring the research: the surprisingly small budget, practical stunt choices, and an alternate ending that changes the emotional wreckage. If you’re into modern horror movies about obsession, cursed wishes, and the real-world terror of control, this conversation is for you. Subscribe, share the show with a horror fan, and leave a review. What did you think the wish really cost Nikki?  Head to www.screamsandstreams.com for more information related to our episode.

  5. Sep 5

    Ep. 137: Damian McCarthy's "Hokum" (2026)

    A horror movie gets a 90% Rotten Tomatoes score, a listener tells us to watch it, and suddenly we’re debating witches, grief, and whether the entire plot is even real. Hokum drops us into an isolated Irish inn where a horror writer arrives to scatter his parents’ ashes and instead finds a missing woman, a sealed-off suite, and a haunting that escalates fast. We also attempt the “Irish Honeymoon” sinister sip inspired by magic milk, and it goes about as well as you’d expect when half and half meets whiskey.  We break down first impressions versus second-watch appreciation, including why Adam Scott’s character is so hard to root for and why that might be the point. Then we get granular on the horror craft: claustrophobic dumbwaiter scenes, creepy statue tableaus, face-flash jump scares, and sound design that builds dread without smothering every moment in music cues. If you love haunted hotel movies, folk horror vibes, and tight-space tension, there’s a lot here to chew on.  The real fun starts when we pull at the loose threads: the timeline problems, the missing cell phones, the questionable logic of that untouched bathtub water, and the ending beat that re-frames everything. Is the witch lore literal, or are we watching a drugged, traumatized spiral that turns guilt into monsters? Hit play, then come argue it out with us. If you enjoy the show, subscribe, share the episode with a horror-loving friend, and leave a rating and review wherever you listen.  Head to www.screamsandstreams.com for more information related to our episode.

  6. Jun 27

    Ep. 136: Takashi Shimizu's "Ju-On: The Grudge" (2002)

    That clicking noise isn’t just a jump scare. It’s a warning that once you step into Ju-on: The Grudge (2002), the movie’s curse logic has already decided your fate. We’re Mike, Chad, and Sam, and we put Takashi Shimizu’s J-horror classic back under the microscope to see what still creeps us out, what drags, and why this haunted house story became a template for a generation of supernatural horror. We start with quick impressions, the plot’s ruthless simplicity, and the stuff that makes rewatching tricky: a quiet tone, a fragmented timeline, and a vibe that feels very early-2000s. Then we get specific, naming the horror tropes Ju-on leans on (and sometimes overuses), from “let’s check that creepy noise” decisions to security footage reveals, glitchy cameras, flickering lights, and phones that refuse to behave. We also talk about the moments that still work because they’re built on sound design and physical performance, like the stair crawl, the bed-sheet nightmare, and the way the film uses eyes, shadows, and silence to pressure your brain into filling in the worst details. From there we stack it up against the American remake, including why the remake can feel clearer and scarier for first-time viewers, and we share bonus research on folklore, production facts, and how this story turned into a massive franchise. If you love Japanese horror, haunted house movies, or curse mythology, this one’s a great debate starter. Subscribe, share the show with a horror-loving friend, and leave a review, then tell us: original Ju-on or the U.S. remake?  Head to www.screamsandstreams.com for more information related to our episode.

About

What if you could get a front row seat on a journey through the best and worst horror movies of the past half-century, all rated on Rotten Tomatoes? Brace yourself for an eerie tour with your hosts, Chad Campbell, Mike Carron, and Sam Schreiner, as they dissect each film with a surgeon's precision and a fan's passion. Our story began on a mundane work day, when two colleagues, Chad and Mike, decided to start a podcast centered on their shared love for horror films. The search for a genre was a winding, convoluted exploration of possibilities, before we arrived at the chilling idea of horror films.Our journey didn’t stop there. We had to figure out where to begin, how to categorize each film, and the scale to use for our rating system. We landed on a year-by-year review of the best and the worst films, starting from 1970 - the dawn of modern horror. Our shows come packed with a variety of categories like First Impressions, Tropes Hall of Shame, One-liners, and more. We also rate each film on a watchability scale, advising if it's worth your precious time. Join us as we sometimes agree, and other times disagree with Rotten Tomatoes' ratings. So, fasten your seat belts, it's going to be a spooky ride! Head to www.screamsandstreams.com for links and information related to our episodes.

You Might Also Like