Law and Chaos

I generally like this program. I listen regularly and followed it under its previous title. That said I feel like the explanation of “per se” and “per quod” might deserve a revisit. “Per se” is when a statement is false outright or “on the face of it.” “Per quod” is when the defamation is implied. For “per quod,” some states like Missouri have an “innocent construction” defense, meaning that is the statement is true in its most innocent interpretation, then it is not defamatory.

I listen to every episode and read Liz’s posts between episodes. I tried to become a member and my bank account was deducting the monthly fee for membership but I was still getting commercials. I wrote several emails that were never answered. I finally was able to get in touch with Patreon and was informed that they had no record of me joining, even with proof of auto deduct from my bank.

Liz and Andrew break down the week’s legal news, accessible to both lawyers and non-lawyers. It’s a clear and conversational approach to the critical cases each week. I walk away smarter and more informed.

Liz Dye is a queen. Andrew is brilliant (They both are) and I throughly enjoy this podcast. But it’s really for intelligent folk. If you don’t like it, it’s probably over your head.