Howie’s Substack Podcast (private feed for howielisnoff@gmail.com)

Howie Lisnoff

I write from the point of view of the liberal/left. As a journalist over many decades, I’ve written about issues that the mass media doesn’t, or won’t, address. howielisnoff2024.substack.com

  1. “A Simple Twist of Fate”*

    3d ago

    “A Simple Twist of Fate”*

    Photo credit: selfie “A Simple Twist of Fate”* Getting ready to play Dylan’s “A Simple Twist of Fate,” I thought of the folk and rock heroes from my generation of baby boomers who made astronomically big bucks, were showered in a constant spotlight of celebrity, and went on to become multimillionaires. It takes no more than a simple click and search of Google to find their net worth. A few years ago, I wrote about the comments Joni Mitchell made about the generation of baby boomers at Woodstock. Read “Woodstock at 50,” (March 29, 2019) at CounterPunch. Her observations were fairly earthshaking given the revenue the song “Woodstock” must have made for her. Of interest is the fact that Mitchell didn’t attend that massive gathering of the youth movement in August 1969. She was on a major TV interview program soon after with Crosby, Stills, and Nash. They most certainly were there. I love playing Neil Young songs on my acoustic guitar, with the footnote that the consensus is that my folk voice is reportedly pretty bad. I’ll keep on singing as if no one is watching or listening to me. Following the 2001 terror attacks, Young wrote a song, “Let’s Roll,” and spoke out for the Patriot Act. Many know what that law has done to individual rights. Here was a guy that I also wrote about in “Woodstock at 50,” who wrote “Ohio,” about the May 4, 1970 massacre of students by the Ohio National Guard at Kent State University. Go figure? Early on in the hapless and hopeless presidential campaign of Kamala Harris, a celebrity, another great singer-songwriter, performed at a local venue. I am not saying the celebrity’s motivation was bad, as he’s supported some pretty liberal candidates. What I am saying is that celebrities, such as this particular celebrity, enhance their images and perhaps bottom line with such appearances. Some less generous commentators, who I can’t name offhand, have called fame in support of political personages a kind of grifting. I don’t think if I had been called up to the stage at that local Harris rally to perform a cover, I would have accepted. I was saved by not being there, and of course, I never would have been called on since I’m an unknown. Celebrity is a result of the notoriety of many of the greats that I named above. After all, isn’t separating the art from the artist part of the equation, whether or not they become multimillionaires and unaccessible because of our support and adoration? A few years ago, my wife and I were ushering at a local theater around the holiday season, when the play was held up for about 15 minutes because a celebrity and his family were coming to watch the performance. A year or two later, that same celebrity had a leading role in the same play that had been postponed a few years earlier to wait for that performer’s arrival. This is an expected outcome of celebrity and influence. My collection of writing from 2008-2026 is at Amazon in Writing On The Left For a Better World. Help a writer and buy a volume or two or three. * Bob Dylan Thank you for subscribing. Share this episode.

    4 min
  2. Jul 1

    Less Than a Penny for Your Thoughts

    Less Than a Penny for Your Thoughts It’s been decades since I dealt with a publication that paid for articles. Even though I was not crazy about dealing with a then-editor of the Providence Journal, at least they paid and they paid the industry rate that freelancers earned at that time. The Palm Beach Post didn’t pay me for an article I wrote about gun violence and added a complaint involving the article’s conclusion about the National Rifle Association, and that final paragraph was excised from the final piece. The “best” issue related to nonpayment was in connection with an article on a specific issue related to the Kent State massacre of May 4, 1970, which I wrote at the suggestion or behest of an editor at the Cleveland Plain Dealer. The forensic sound analysis of a student’s recording at the time of the massacre was what that article explored. It took months to complete the article, which involved interviews and lots of preparation in the way of sources. As an anniversary of the massacre approached, and the editor I interacted with about the article failed to respond to my then-latest edit of the piece, I dumped that article down into the online political site at which I had contributed for years, also without pay. The conclusion is that many publications don’t pay for the work of the writer or journalist. In other words, we’re expected to write to inform and perhaps for our health, the latter not being a reason at all. In my opinion, the Internet has accelerated that change with writers certain to need a day job to stay afloat. Adding insult to the injury of not paying for the labor of writers is when publications tout the large, in my estimation, donations that come their way. How insulting it is to write repeatedly for a publication, have that publication tout large donations, and not receive the proverbial 25¢. At least writing on my own on Substack, I can keep some measure of dignity. Thank you for subscribing. Share this episode.

    3 min
  3. Jun 26

    We’ve Reached 250

    Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons We’ve Reached 250 I have to return to 1981, or earlier, to talk about where we are at 250 years out from our founding. I’m driving around a rotary in Narragansett, Rhode Island, when a commentator says, on an FM radio station, that those of us who hold democratic and ethical values need to fight back in the face of the reactionary policies of Ronald Reagan. For those who remember, Reagan began the process of handing power over to those who wanted war over peace, those who wanted a monied elite in positions of power, and who won an election through the incompetence of his predecessor, Jimmy Carter, with an unhealthy dose of racism added to the mix. A massive redistribution of wealth followed, along with attacks against government agencies that helped people. It was “Morning in America.” Actually, what it was, was the long march toward the debacle we see today with endless wars, massive income inequality, and three branches of government that provide no credible opposition. We live in a system in which a duopoly runs the show of the power elite of the military, business, and the investment class. Industry that lifted all boats has long since departed our shores for cheap labor and cheap infrastructure. For me, pushing back against the Vietnam War, ancient history now, was the most significant action of my life. Both the military and CIA had been operating around the globe with impunity since World War II, but Vietnam put the system on display. Reagan comes into the picture again, since he attempted to launder the horror of the US in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos. Look at his words about the protest movement of the 1960s and early 1970s for a hint of what was to come, and we see the result in the current disaster that is the Trump regime. Even quoting Reagan today sickens, as he had a lethal hatred for both the free speech movement and protesters against the Vietnam War. Observers can see the results in how protesters are treated near ICE prisons and criminalizing dissent to learn how the movement to the far right turned out. Going back a bit, yes, there were yahoos on the left, but looking around today, there are far more extreme yahoos on the right. Recall the Capitol insurrection or the Unite the Right in Charlottesville, Virginia. Following the Vietnam War, I held out hope that the political and economic systems would be reformed, but the opposite is true. Racism is now applied to immigrant communities, and the economy makes it more difficult to find a niche and make a living. The industries that left this nation are not coming back, and whole swaths of former citadels of productivity have left these shores. Weapons production seems to be one of the few growth industries left, with technology following behind. Critical thinking about all of this has been left on the trash heap of history. Genocide in the Middle East and mayhem in Eastern Europe are all the rage now. We come perilously close to igniting the nuclear fuse. The environment is a sinkhole of despair! The Founders were the pampered elite of their time, mostly slaveowners, who saddled the nation with an Electoral College that gives the few power over the many. Many of the best ideas of a republican form of democratic governance have fallen victim to the elitism and racism of the majority of those who gathered in Philadelphia to found a new nation. None of this, however, is an endorsement of theocratic forms of government, including those influences here, or dictatorial regimes around the world. Thank you for subscribing. Share this episode.

    5 min
  4. Jun 20

    Early Summer Recollections: Past and Present

    Early Summer Recollections: Past and Present The day, with fair-weather clouds and a vibrant blue sky and moderate temperature, was much like that day in early July 1971. The Berkshire Connector of I-90 showed off its late-spring greenery among the surrounding rolling hills at both times. On this day, I headed to the Albany, New York area to pick up my guitar, which was in repair. All of those years ago, the four friends’ destination was Eganville, Ontario, Canada. We were on the road to visit a family friend of mine who was building a house in Ontario. My best friend Joe, his friend Judy, and another friend of mine rode the inviting highway in my friend’s green 1967 Ford Mustang. Of all of those friends, it was Judy who I stayed in contact with the longest and who died four years ago. The others on that trip and in that car are gone, except in memory. I had become acquainted with Judy when I called her in the spring of a year before in an attempt to reach Joe about the possible dangers of his participation in a protest rally in New Haven, Connecticut, in support of members of the Black Panther Party who were on trial there. I told Judy that military transports had flown low over my family’s house in central Rhode Island on their way to Quonset Naval Air Station in case Nixon wanted the military on the streets of New Haven to deal with the crowds gathered there. Judy was a senior at New York University, and Joe studied for a master’s degree in literature. He would go on to earn a Ph.D. in college and university administration. The last time I saw Judy was in the early morning hours of a July day after driving down from Canada following the 4th. We left Judy and Joe at a graduate students’ small one-story apartment complex, as Judy was ready to begin studying for a Ph.D. in psychology, a degree she would never get for reasons I do not know. Through a strange and serendipitous set of circumstances, I would reconnect with Judy decades later, but our interactions were of the most superficial kind. Sadly, when I sent Judy a commentary about our road trip of July 1971, she seemed upset by something I had written in that article. I think that it may have had to do with the way I categorized the July 4th holiday that year, amidst the turmoil of the Vietnam War era. When I heard the shocking news that Judy had died four years ago, I found much of the biographical information of her life story very much antithetical to the person I had known at NYU. I found a reference to Judy’s years as an undergraduate very curious in that bio. A guess is that one or both of Judy’s daughters had written about her life. Judy’s days at NYU were portrayed as being immersed in the youth movement and movements for social justice during that era. No mention was made of the antiwar movement, but I knew from attending meetings with Judy and Joe that they were heavily involved in the latter. In 1971, we all traveled to D.C. to take part in the May Day antiwar demonstrations there, which were anything but sedate. Thousands were arrested on the streets of Washington and held at a sports stadium in that city. But, there seemed to have been a kind of almost seamless transition for Judy sometime following that era, as she earned an MBA and began working in the insurance industry. That didn’t particularly make an impression on me, but it was the fact, described in Judy’s life story, that seemed to point to living a middle-class, and perhaps an upper-middle class life, with absolutely no hint of involvement in any social causes whatsoever. It may be that Judy’s reaction to my essay about the July 1971 road trip reflected the redirection of her life toward careerism and away from movements for social justice. I don’t know. Many of us, the baby boom generation, became middle class, but remained socially and politically active. A recollection of the road trip that Judy recalled, but I must have submerged, was of being led by local police out of a town north of Albany off of Route 87, where we had stopped for dinner. I remember Joe getting into an argument with some people sitting at the counter while we sat in a nearby booth. The argument had to do with hair length, and Joe was not a person who shrank from confrontation. What I do know is that my friend Joe moved along that similar path of careerism. That these two lives followed that life story is not surprising. Millions did, and I often wonder what sentiments they had as they apparently jettisoned ideals in one sense for the comforts or acceptance of middle-class life. One final memory of Judy is of the three friends getting up in West Potomac Park on that May morning in 1971, after having spent the night in sleeping bags. We were ordered out of the park by police. Judy went her own way toward a women’s march against the war, while Joe and I sought refuge in the nearby Lincoln Memorial, as the police quickly began hassling demonstrators there and throughout the city. Judy would have been recognizable on that day from so long ago because she had striking red hair that set her apart. The entire Washington, D.C. experience was surreal because the theme of the May Day demonstrations was to stop the government from business as usual while it waged the vicious war in Southeast Asia. All of these thoughts came tumbling back as I drove on the Berkshire Connector of I-90 at the height of spring at the edge of a different summer, but similar in many respects. Thank you for subscribing. Share this episode.

    7 min
  5. May 22

    Democratic Party’s Autopsy 2024

    Democratic Party’s Autopsy 2024 The leadership of the Democratic Party has finally released its so-called autopsy of the 2024 presidential election. They didn’t want to release this devastating loss to you-know-who, who has done you-know-what to this nation, its people, and the world. So, how did this debacle take place? The Democratic Party, much like the Republican Party, has long since lost its interest in supporting its people, the people of the US. You and me, to differing degrees. They, the Democrats, once the champions of the New Deal and the Great Society, became the party doing the bidding of the corporate elite and the military-industrial-investment complex. The Democrats would present a prettier face to the public every four years, but wars, corporate bailouts, weak environmentalism, and support for the very wealthy. The results of deindustrialization are obvious with masses of former manufacturing sites in the US abandoned to low-wage countries. All of this happened while hegemony over the globe increased, usually through trade agreements and a military presence in the form of US military bases. Then came the 2024 presidential election. Joe Biden was a Republican president in most ways. He claimed to be a Zionist, which meant expensive and destructive support for Israel. He was a preeminent supporter of tough crime bills that put masses of people in jail. Income inequality was as apparent during Biden’s term as it was before him. Then came Kamala Harris, a weak candidate. Whether or not presidents generally select weak running mates is beside the point. In a society that is biased against women at the presidential level, Harris, who seemed not to be able to articulate a coherent agenda against Trump, was at an immediate disadvantage following Biden’s rejection by Democratic donors and Democratic leaders. The Trump administration cornered Harris on her position on transgender issues and used that strategy to the hilt. It was sort of like George H.W. Bush’s attack against Michael Dukakis on crime. Much of the electorate in the US is not sophisticated in terms of manipulation, and the Republicans have been playing that card for years and then stiffing a segment of their supporters. Look at the cost of fossil fuels, housing, and food today, and people have to wonder. Look at these costly and destructive wars with $1.5 trillion, in addition to billions spent on the Iran war, which is hurting us all and is illegal as a war of aggression. I watched an interview with Kamala Harris sometime late in the summer of 2024, and when asked how she was different from Joe Biden, she gave a foolish response that she was obviously not Joe Biden. What else is new? This is the New York Times’ summary of major points in the Democrats so-called presidential campaign autopsy. Read it and weep, but don’t be surprised, as this has been going on for decades! Thank you for subscribing. Share this episode.

    4 min

About

I write from the point of view of the liberal/left. As a journalist over many decades, I’ve written about issues that the mass media doesn’t, or won’t, address. howielisnoff2024.substack.com