Nadine@9

Nadine@9

0.0 (0)
Parenting
Updated Weekly

Ever wonder how faith fits into politics, culture, and everyday life? Nadine@9 digs into the issues shaping our world and reminds listeners that feelings can’t be the foundation for truth. In a culture driven by emotion and opinion, she challenges believers to seek the ultimate Truth found only in God’s Word. nadineat9.substack.com

2h ago

What If Faithfulness Is the Victory?

What happens when you step out in faith, do the work, fight the fight—and the outcome isn’t what you hoped for? That’s where I started my conversation with Dusty Blue. After a hard-fought campaign for Missouri State Senate District 18, I wanted to hear how Dusty was doing on the other side of Election Day. We talked about some of the highs and lows of the campaign, what he learned along the way, what surprised him, and what he believes the road ahead looks like. But our conversation quickly became about something much bigger than an election. Because if we believe God is sovereign, then our responsibility isn’t to control the outcome. Our responsibility is to be faithful to what He has called us to do. And that led us into one of the questions I think Christians need to wrestle with: What is the Church’s role in the civic arena? Why are so many Christians hesitant—or apathetic—when it comes to engaging the culture around them? What happens when the Church retreats from the public square? And what would it look like for the Church to stop simply reacting to culture and start intentionally shaping it? We talked about the difference between filling a state with church buildings and filling a state with The Church—people who understand that their faith isn’t confined to Sunday morning, but reaches into their families, communities, schools, workplaces, government, and every part of culture. The election may be over. But the work isn’t. And maybe the question isn’t simply, “Who won?” Maybe the better question is: Were we faithful? Because duty is ours. Results are God’s. You can listen to Dusty’s other episode here. If you are interested in, or have been feeling the Lord’s calling to, work among churches to help them get educated and activated in their civic duty, please email me at nadine@9@proton.me. I’d love to hear from you! Nadine@9’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Nadine@9’s Substack at nadineat9.substack.com/subscribe
Sep 11

The Truth Doesn’t Need A Villain

Missouri voters went to the polls in August under one congressional map. Now, just weeks later, they’ve been told that map will not be the map used for the November general election. It’s confusing. It’s frustrating. And it’s tempting to immediately ask: Who is to blame? But what if the answer isn’t as simple as we want it to be? In this episode, I sit down with Act for Missouri to talk through the mess surrounding Missouri’s congressional redistricting and the difficult position voters now find themselves in. The Missouri Supreme Court has ruled that the 2025 congressional map will not be used for the November 2026 election and that the 2022 map remains in effect. But beyond the legal details is a bigger question: Are we actually interested in the truth—even when the truth doesn’t give us a convenient person to blame? We have become increasingly quick to pick a side, defend our people, attack the other side and decide who is “right” before we’ve even worked through the facts. And I think that says something about us. It seems that in crisis after crisis, too many people care more about being right than doing what is right. Could this situation have been avoided? There are certainly lessons to be learned, and there may be changes that need to be made. But acknowledging that something could have been handled differently is not the same thing as proving that someone acted outside the law. Sometimes the facts are complicated. Sometimes multiple things can be true at the same time. And sometimes the answer isn’t finding the perfect villain—it’s fixing the system that allowed the problem to happen. That’s where I believe we need to go from here. Rather than spending all our energy pointing fingers, we the people need to demand better laws and better processes so Missouri voters aren’t put in this position again. Because this isn’t ultimately about protecting one political side or proving another side wrong. It’s about whether we care enough about truth, law and good government to fix what isn’t working. The question isn’t just, “Who’s to blame?” The question is, “What are we going to do about it?” Act4MO socials: Facebook, X, Rumble, YouTube MO Constitution Art. 3 Sec. 49 HB1 Articles about Supreme Court warnings to SOS Amendment 6 (on November 2026 Ballot) Nadine@9’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Nadine@9’s Substack at nadineat9.substack.com/subscribe
Sep 5

Should We Walk Away?

Can someone who has spent years fighting for liberty really just walk away from politics? I sat down with Ike Skelton to talk about what he’s been doing since losing the Senate race—and what the path ahead might look like. Can Ike actually walk away from politics? I have a hard time believing that’s possible for someone like him. And honestly, I’m not sure it would be wise. Our state needs steady voices who understand the Constitution and are willing to stand on principle, even when it isn’t politically convenient. We also took a hard look at the sudden backlash against Flock cameras. Is there truly an uprising against them, or are we seeing another case of people jumping on the bandwagon because it has suddenly become popular to oppose them? And if people are just waking up to the problem now, why now? Where were the investigations called for by U.S. Senators a couple of years ago when Ike was fighting for his freedom because he stood up for the liberty of his county? That leads to an even bigger question: Is Flock really the issue? Because if Flock disappears tomorrow, our work isn’t finished. We have to remain vigilant enough to recognize when one system of surveillance or control is simply replaced by another. We also went places in this conversation that aren’t always comfortable—and frankly, aren’t always topics people want to discuss. What does limited government actually mean? Does America still understand what our Constitution was designed to do? And more importantly, do we really want limited government? What happens if three-quarters of the country decide they don’t want our current Constitution to stand? Should it be rewritten simply because the majority wants something different? And perhaps the most important question of all: What is our role as Americans—and is that role different from our role as Christians? This conversation covers a lot of ground, but I think these are questions we need to be willing to wrestle with. Take a listen and let me know what you think. Do we still understand liberty?Do we actually want limited government?And are we willing to remain vigilant—even when the threat changes its name? Take a listen to past shows I’ve done with Ike to learn more about his fight against Flock cameras and mass surveillance before it was the popular thing to do! Thanks for reading Nadine@9’s Substack! This post is public so feel free to share it. Get full access to Nadine@9’s Substack at nadineat9.substack.com/subscribe
Aug 22

Beyond The Echo Chamber

What happens when we stop talking only to people who already agree with us? That was one of the reasons I invited Cody Hutcheson to join me on Nadine@9. I knew Cody and I had different perspectives on some issues, and I wanted to have more conversations on the show where differing viewpoints are actually welcome. It’s easy to live in an echo chamber. We hear the same opinions, follow the same people, and surround ourselves with voices that reinforce what we already believe. But if we’re never challenged, how do we know whether our convictions have been thoughtfully examined? Sometimes being challenged should cause us to change our minds. Other times, it should cause us to dig deeper, ask better questions, and gain an even stronger understanding of why we believe what we believe. My conversation with Cody ended up covering more of her personal story—from her time serving in the United States Air Force to what eventually brought her to Missouri and led her to run for State Representative in District 123. But one moment in the conversation really stood out to me. A caller challenged Cody on her perspective, and rather than becoming defensive or dismissive, she remained calm and respectful. So maybe we haven’t lost the ability to have meaningful conversations after all. Maybe we can disagree on a lot of things and still recognize the things we do agree on. Maybe we can work toward a common goal without pretending our differences don’t exist. And maybe listening to someone we disagree with doesn’t mean compromising our convictions—it means having enough confidence in those convictions to actually engage. As a follower of Christ, I know there will always be a divide between those who have repented and accepted salvation and those who have not. But that divide was never meant to be an excuse to alienate people. So the question I continue to ask myself is: How do I love someone well, have an honest conversation, and neither condone what is wrong nor condemn the person? I hope this episode encourages you to step outside your own echo chamber, listen to someone you disagree with, and remember that disagreement doesn’t have to mean division. Stay tuned for more conversations with Cody and digging into some deeper topics! Thanks for reading Nadine@9’s Substack! This post is public so feel free to share it. Get full access to Nadine@9’s Substack at nadineat9.substack.com/subscribe
Aug 14

Rugged. Unconventional. Passionate.

This week, I talked with 26-year-old Jake Jackson—a young American who is ready to put in the hard work required to preserve our Republic. Jake’s passion for limited government and individual liberty started early. Even as a kid, he noticed government attempting to dictate certain day-to-day aspects of life, and it never sat well with him. Some difficult years in middle school would ultimately help prepare him for the path he is on today: politics. And Jake isn’t stepping into politics to simply fall in line. He’s stepping into it to ask questions, challenge assumptions, hold politicians accountable, and encourage healthy debate—even when that means challenging people on his own side. We talk about the problems that arise when party loyalty becomes more important than constitutional principles, the “uniparty” mentality that can reward bullies and discourage dissent, and why Republicans shouldn’t automatically fall in line simply because their party has put something forward. Because, as I say often, our loyalty shouldn’t belong to a political party. It should belong to the Constitution—and to the principles that make our Republic worth defending. And there’s a pretty fitting family connection behind Jake’s passion for the fight. He has traced his ancestry back to John Sevier, a battle-tested Patriot who fought for American independence and went on to become Tennessee’s first governor. Turns out, those Patriot roots run pretty deep. This is what it looks like when a young American decides that being a citizen means more than simply casting a ballot every few years. You don’t have to be in the majority to make a difference. Sometimes, the most important work starts on the outside. Find Jake on Facebook and X. If you would like to sign his petition to ban Flock cameras in St. Charles you can do that here. Nadine@9’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Nadine@9’s Substack at nadineat9.substack.com/subscribe
Aug 7

Post Election Thoughts

Missouri was loud and clear: the legislature did not give voters amendments worth changing our Constitution for. Now the question is—will our elected officials listen? My hope is that the Governor and General Assembly will look at this election as an opportunity to recognize that they need to do better. My concern is that instead, they’ll simply blame “stupid” voters for not understanding what they were trying to accomplish. But there’s a bigger issue here that goes beyond these two amendments. How did we get to a place where we think it’s acceptable to block someone simply because we’re annoyed with them or disagree with them? When did belittling someone for having a different viewpoint become acceptable? And perhaps most importantly, when did we decide that being a Republican—or belonging to any political party—means we have to defend everything our side does? I don’t belong to a political party, and I won’t allow any party to dictate what is right and what is wrong. Truth isn’t determined by a party platform, a politician, or a majority vote. Truth is found in one place—and I belong only to my Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. So here’s my question for those Republicans who supported these two amendments: Would you have supported them if Democrat leadership had put them forward? Big shout out to Michael Compton of Act for Missouri for writing an excellent book! I highly recommend reading and sharing with others. You can buy it here. Clearly, the people were not in favor of these legislative amendments! Nadine@9’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Nadine@9’s Substack at nadineat9.substack.com/subscribe
Aug 1

The Supermajority Problem

Time stamp for amendments:Amendment 1-startAmendment 2-00:29:00Amendment 4-00:44:00Amendment 5- 1:19:00 Hey Friends! Election Day is almost here, and Missouri voters have four constitutional amendments in front of them. On this episode, Mike and Amy from Act4MO join me to walk through each proposal, what it would do, and why these measures deserve more than a quick glance before heading to the polls. One of the biggest frustrations we discuss isn’t simply what’s on the ballot—it’s how these amendments got there. Time and again this legislative session, Missouri’s Republican supermajority had opportunities to send clean, straightforward proposals to the people. Instead, many voters are once again left sorting through complicated compromises and political “sausage.” We also talk about the growing divide among conservatives. Increasingly, anyone unwilling to embrace mediocre legislation is dismissed as helping the other side or labeled something they’re not. But healthy disagreement isn’t always a sign that something is wrong. Sometimes it’s evidence that people are refusing to compromise on principle. As Christians, our identity should never be rooted in a political party or movement. Years ago, God reminded me that my truest label is “redeemed.” That’s the identity I want to carry, regardless of which political battles are won or lost. We may not win every battle in front of us, but Scripture reminds us that the war has already been decided. My prayer is simply that we remain faithful to Christ until the very end. You can find Act4MO’s helpful resources including their August voter guide here.You can also find the actual amendment language here. Thanks for reading Nadine@9’s Substack! This post is public so feel free to share it. Get full access to Nadine@9’s Substack at nadineat9.substack.com/subscribe
Jul 25

Watchdog For The Citizens

Hey Friends! I’m keeping it short and sweet today because I’m camping with my family this weekend, and it’s time to disconnect! As always, I really enjoyed my conversation with Ike Skelton. We spent a lot of time talking about what Personhoodreally means, and my hope is that our discussion helped clear up some of the misconceptions that have been a stumbling block in the movement to abolish abortion. You tell me...did it help your understanding of abolition? Then I had a great conversation with Gerald Wistrand about his plans for the Missouri State Auditor’s Office. It was refreshing to hear him speak genuinely about his desire to do what every public official should do—be a watchdog for the citizens. I’ve also included photos of the two documents we discussed during the episode. If you found this conversation helpful, I’d really appreciate it if you’d share this episode. I think it has some great content! Have a wonderful weekend, and I’ll see you next Friday at 9! Connect with Ike on FB, or Website.Connect with Gerald on FB, or Website. Nadine@9’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Get full access to Nadine@9’s Substack at nadineat9.substack.com/subscribe

Ever wonder how faith fits into politics, culture, and everyday life? Nadine@9 digs into the issues shaping our world and reminds listeners that feelings can’t be the foundation for truth. In a culture driven by emotion and opinion, she challenges believers to seek the ultimate Truth found only in God’s Word. nadineat9.substack.com

Creator

Nadine@9
Years Active

2024 - 2026
Episodes

103
Rating

Clean
Copyright

© Nadine@9
Show Website

Nadine@9