AI governance is usually framed as risk mitigation. Lambert Hogenhout, the United Nations' Chief of Data and AI, says that's exactly the problem: we've gone from fifteen years to adjust to a new technology, down to fifteen hours.In this episode of The AI Values Podcast, Edosa Odaro and Lindley Gooden sit down with Lambert Hogenhout, Chief of Data, Analytics and Emerging Technologies at the United Nations Secretariat, for a conversation that starts with reinventing yourself for the age of AI and ends up somewhere nobody expected: happiness. Along the way it takes in AI risk management, the slow erosion of truth under "AI slop", and a pointed disagreement about whether the EU AI Act does enough. Lambert's argument is uncomfortable for anyone treating AI governance as a checkbox: real governance isn't only about stopping bad outcomes, it's about actively engineering good ones, and most current regulation only does the first half of that job.GUEST: Lambert Hogenhout is Chief of Data, Analytics and Emerging Technologies at the United Nations Secretariat, where he leads AI strategy, data governance and responsible tech policy across the UN system. He has 25 years' experience spanning the private sector, the World Bank and the UN, and is also an author and keynote speaker researching AI and human happiness.WHAT IS COVERED: ► Why the UN's AI chief says we're adjusting to new technology in fifteen hours, not fifteen years. Lambert explains why the honest response to that speed isn't faster adoption, it's more deliberate adoption, for individuals and for organisations. ► "Come on, that's not a job." Lambert on why nobody could have predicted search engine optimisation or social media influencer as careers in 1985, and why guessing at the jobs of 2031 is just as pointless now. ► AI slop, deepfakes and the slow erosion of truth: Lambert on why "you can't be sure that anything you see or hear is real" anymore, and what that does to trust at scale. ► Why Lambert thinks the EU AI Act gets governance half right. Risk mitigation matters, but he argues regulation also has to actively engineer for benefit, not just prevent harm, a distinction most AI governance frameworks miss. ► AI and happiness: Lambert's work applying psychologist Martin Seligman's PERMA model to technology adoption, and why the honest answer to "is AI making us happier" is currently no.⏰ EPISODE TIMESTAMPS:00:00 - The Future of AI Jobs Nobody Can Predict01:13 - Responsible AI Adoption Starts With What You Refuse To Automate04:19 - AI Governance and Reinventing Work for the Age of AI08:16 - Career Advice for the AI Generation: What To Study Now10:08 - AI Slop and the Erosion of Truth11:57 - Deliberate AI Adoption: 15 Hours, Not 15 Years 16:48 - AI and Happiness: What Adoption Is Actually For29:03 - The EU AI Act Debate: Why Risk Mitigation Isn't Enough #TheAIValuesPodcast #AIGovernance #ResponsibleAI #podcast #futureofwork ──────────────────────────────────────ABOUT THE AI VALUES PODCAST:The AI Values Podcast is where leaders come to think clearly about the trade-offs behind AI adoption not just the opportunities. Hosted by Edosa Odaro (author, 'The Values of AI') and Lindley Gooden (author, 'The Future of Truth'), with weekly conversations at the intersection of AI, trust, governance, and the future of work.🎙 SUBSCRIBE to The AI Values Podcast for honest, rigorous conversations at the intersection of AI ethics, AI governance, and business leadership.◼ Find out more about The AI Values Institute◼ Reach out: podcast@theaivalues.org ◼ Co-Hosts: Edosa Odaro & Lindley Gooden