I am OPTimist

Monika Bravo

I am OPTimist. I am not willing to be defined by a few words—what I do is a living journey. I am a multidisciplinary artist, empirical polymath, writer, evolutionary astrologer, libertarian/Bitcoiner. My philosophy integrates Eastern, ancestral, and cosmological traditions with psychological inquiries, praxeology, and Austrian economics, emphasizing liberty, value, resources, and self-worth in the quest for individual and societal service. I create public art commissions and immersive environments, facilitate dialogue, and explore freedom, shadow work, myths, natural law, Bitcoin, and the architecture of time. This podcast is a reflection of my living and individuated journey. If you are curious, there is much more to explore in the About Me section.👇☝️ www.monikabravo.blog

  1. 1d ago

    Property or Propriety ?

    Early this morning, I was scrolling through social media (more specifically Substack), and I found this quote from the Li Ji, the Confucian book of rites: “The superior man is respectful and reverent, assiduous in his duties and not going beyond them. Retiring and yielding, thus illustrating the principle of propriety.” “道德仁義,非禮不成;教訓正俗,非禮不備;分爭辨訟,非禮不決;君臣上下、父子兄弟,非禮不定;宦學事師,非禮不親;班朝治軍,蒞官行法,非禮威嚴不行;禱祠祭祀,供給鬼神,非禮不誠不莊。是以君子恭敬、撙節、退讓以明禮。 This passage is from the ancient Chinese classic Liji (《禮記》, or Book of Rites), specifically from the chapter "Qu Li I" (《曲禮上》). The text was compiled and edited in the 1st century BCE by the Han Dynasty scholar Dai Sheng (戴聖), collecting earlier ritual philosophies from the school of Confucius. The English translation used here is by the British sinologist James Legge (理雅各), originally published in 1885 in The Sacred Books of the East (Vol. 27). I was scrolling fast, and I actually read property instead of propriety. I started the inquiry with the wrong word. Only later did I realize the confusion, but it had planted a seed for this article. I had not even read the quote properly. My mind took the word somewhere else. So typical, lol. Then when I listened to what I was dictating, I realized that I was mixing them up, realizing that the word was propriety, and these kinds of mishaps are what I enjoy so much about my self-inquiry, because propriety, proper, and property are connected through the idea of what belongs to someone or something, what is proper to its nature, and what sits within its rightful place. The confusion was not itself a mistake, it was one of those intuitive leads that makes the inquiry so rich itself. I focused on the word “property,” deciding to take it apart. Within the Confucian way of thinking, conduct reveals character. behavior: the 君子 (Jūnzǐ) what we can call the cultivated individual, the sage, the one who knows how to behave, understands his or her position inside a relationship and acts according to its measure. He carries what belongs to him and is also able to recognize the boundary that belongs to the other. Therefore, knowing when his action has reached its proper limit. Let’s dissect the word “propriety.” Here is the part that made me laugh when I looked it up: propriety and property come from the same Latin root, proprietas, from proprius, which means one’s own. For a long time, the two words were kind of the same thing. Propriety could mean ownership, and property could mean a quality that belongs to a thing. The English language eventually made a difference between them: something that pertains to land or something that pertains to etiquette and behavior. Both still carry the idea of what belongs to someone or something, what is appropriate to its nature, and what sits within its rightful place. Property here becomes part of the boundary that assigns value to the action. Then there is li, the Chinese word that the English translation turned into propriety. Li is closer to the gesture of something behaving rather than the strict definition of a character: how you bow, who pours the tea first, which seat is yours, the way a family does things because the grandparents did them. It is a form that insinuates and inspires in you a very specific behavior. Proprius begins with the thing itself, with what is its own, and moves outward from there. We can see that the Jūnzǐ, with this gesture of bowing, is part of a ritual and is acting from the inside. Obviously, my mind wanted to immediately distill it from the Austrian economics perspective. Mises begins with the acting individual. As an individual chooses and acts, he assumes the consequences. Rothbard takes this structure into property rights, where the question becomes very concrete: what is mine to decide and what is yours to decide, and where is the boundary between us? I ended up thinking: this phrase, “Know your place in the relationship. Carry your part fully. Respect the boundary of the other, and know when to advance and when to withdraw.” The economic structure within those lines gives action to a boundary, and once this limitation is clear, responsibility arises with it, within it. I can act within what belongs to me, and you can act within what belongs to you. The exchange requires that each person recognizes the other as someone with authority over his or her own domain. A property is something one owns. A property is also a quality that belongs to something by itself. Its nature, integrity can be a property of character, and discipline can be a property of conduct. A foundation has properties that determine what it can carry or not. Therefore, the final question is: what are the properties of a character capable of recognizing the property of another? You see here: the character, the person, the noble man, the sage, the person who is awake and conscious, is able to recognize his own actions and take responsibility for them. As that happens simultaneously, he’s also capable of seeing the limitations between himself and another situation, person, or thing (or the properties of this situation, person, or thing) and giving value to that. Therefore, he knows how to act. Yes, the properties of one character are capable of recognizing the property and limitations of another. Character is revealed through conduct. Confucian ethics is deeply concerned with the cultivation of a person whose behavior expresses an internal order. The Jūnzǐ develops the capacity to recognize measure, relationship, responsibility, and the proper place of his own action. If we think of Aristotle’s ethics, character is formed through action and habit. Virtue becomes a disposition, a way of behaving that develops through practice. A person learns how to judge a situation and act according to its particular conditions. Ethics is a practice. The properties of my character determine how I exercise my own agency. They also determine whether I can recognize the domain of another person. If I understand my own action, I can assume responsibility for its consequences. If I recognize the properties of the person, situation, object, or relationship in front of me, I can perceive its limits and give those limits value. A material has properties that determine how it can be used. A structure has properties that determine what it can sustain. A human being also has properties that determine how he or she acts. Property rights make this visible in economic relationships because they establish a domain. They answer a fundamental question: Who has the authority to decide? Mises begins with human action because economic life originates in individuals making choices. Rothbard follows the implications of those choices into ownership and property rights. Once I recognize another person as having authority over his own domain, my own action acquires a boundary. The boundary in itself is not just serving as a limitation that separates, but it actually has so much information. It imforms me what belongs to me to decide also what belongs to another. It tells me when an exchange requires consent, when responsibility belongs to me, and when the integrity of another person, object, or situation asks me to withdraw. Then the original Confucian idea of propriety becomes surprisingly close to the question that started all of this for me. What is proper? What belongs here? What belongs to me? What belongs to another? And what properties of my own character allow me to recognize the difference? This is one place where ethics, conduct, and economics agree: in the quality of the person who acts and in his capacity to recognize the limits that give value to action. I hope you enjoy this short article. I recently became obsessed with Cameron Winter and his Band Geese 👇 enjoy! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.monikabravo.blog/subscribe

  2. 6d ago

    The Value of Commitment:

    I have been thinking very much about value because we are about to enter yet another Venus retrograde in Scorpio. Venus retrogrades about every 1.6 years, and over eight years it returns to more or less the same area of the zodiac. Looking backward through 2018, 2010, 2002, 1994, and so on, I wanted to see where I was, what I was doing, what I was committing myself to, and especially what I thought had value at the time. Economic value is a practice. For me, this Venus retrograde moves through my 9th house, and Mercury will also retrograde through the same area. The New Moon next week in Libra is also going to be around the same neighborhood. My natal Moon is in Scorpio, and it falls in the 9th house. It is in a closing relationship to Neptune in the 10th, and the Moon in my chart rules my North Node in Cancer in the 5th house. Of course, I am interested in perspective, in seeking truth, and in going deeper into the underworld. This is my descent. I am interested in how perspective changes what I value, value being one of the signatures of Venus. How I listen to my needs and how I value those needs changes the choices I make. The 9th house in my chart is where I metabolize experience into meaning. That is probably why I keep going back through old cycles. I am looking at what I believed then, what I was seeking then, what I valued then, and what my behavior revealed about all of it at the time. The interesting part is the distance between those versions of me. That creates another pattern ready to be deciphered. Like a spiral it shows long term evolutionary processes. What becomes very salient every eight years; as of the last one in 2018, I have been working on economic value for a while. As for Scorpio, it deals with shared values, merging, commitment, confrontation, and the places where another person or partnership enters your field and suddenly value becomes something you have to negotiate with one another. It is also the place of the underworld where we meet our own deepest fears. Going back to Persephone and how she came out of the underworld and what she brought: what are the goodies here of my realization? The descent to the underworld will provide a sense of value uncovering truths. When you are learning what you need, you are also confronted with knowing what you are willing to give and how far you are willing to merge with somebody or something else while remaining inside your own life. Commitment takes a turn here. It sounds romantic until we look at what it actually requires: our time, our attention, our energy, and the fact that we follow through. Our choices and the repetition of them will sometimes feel like a sacrifice or an offering. Sometimes saying yes to one thing means saying no to something else. Economics is fundamentally concerned with choices. Resources, time, attention, and energy are finite, therefore every decision implies an allocation. This applies not just to money, it surely applies to relationships. ROI, opportunity cost. Where am I putting my time? ROI means return on investment, a simple financial metric used to measure the amount of profit or loss generated by an investment relative to its total cost. Where am I putting my attention? If I am spending hours trying to get somebody to do something they already told me they want to do, because they want me as their accountability mentor, what am I actually investing in? At what point does accountability become me carrying somebody else’s commitment? In the past, I would sign up for that because I felt it was important to be there for others. Now, coming into this retrograde, I have been re-evaluating how I want to relate to the other. I have the South Node, Jupiter, and now Mars transiting my 7th house in Leo, so if my relationship to the other is not solar, there is no point in connecting. Some people speak about what they want all the time. I do it too. Then there is what I actually do every day. What time I wake up. What I postpone, what I practice; where the hours go. At some point, behavior starts telling the story more clearly than intention. At this point in my life, what interests me more is what unfolds in the present moment between two people, two points of contact. It could be situations and things as well. The shadow can surface there too. I just don’t want to enter the relationship through responsibility for somebody else’s process, or by carrying something that belongs to them. A person can sincerely want something and continuously choose actions that move somewhere else. What is the commitment behind the intention? Sometimes I am seeing a version of myself from 25 years ago through another person. I know somebody can eventually cross it because I did. The problem begins when, because I can see the route, I start investing in whether the other person will take it. I can care about their potential. I can understand exactly where they are because I lived there myself. Needless to say, I just do not want to finance that potential with my time anymore. Venus in scorpio retrograde through the years: In the fall of 1994, I had just moved to New York. My perspective was completely different because I had moved to a new city and committed myself to becoming an artist without even knowing how to do that. That was my wish, and I made it happen. Skip school, get a studio, absorb everything in the city hands-on. Become an artist by practice not degree, and so I did. Eight years later, in 2002, I had put a lot of effort into getting exhibitions, selling my artwork, getting representation, and attending several residency programs. I also noticed that I had become much lazier with personal habits. I was taking a lot of substances, barely eating, working in the middle of the night, waking up at midday, and living inside a rhythm that had become normal to me. One day I looked at myself in the mirror and I looked tired. I had black bags under my eyes. I was 37, and I remember saying: “I look like s**t. I must make a change.” So I did. I quit smoking cigarettes using a hypnotist. That was fun. I stopped drinking alcohol. I can do that with no problem. And I started the practice of meditation. Once I became serious about the Taoist practice, the biggest crutch I had was weed. One day I woke up and asked myself: “Do I want to have a smoke, or do I want to meditate?” The answer was obvious to me at the moment. That was more than intention, it was an orientation, I was making sure that this was the road I wanted to take. There is something very simple in that moment, I already knew what I wanted. The question was whether my actions were going to agree with it. Then, in 2010, after the economic chaos of 2008 and 2009, I came to the realization that I had a vault of value in my studio and my storage unit, and I needed to do something very different from what I was doing, change of compass again. Thus far, I had been expecting people to come to me, to find me, to invite me to exhibit, to buy my work, and so on. In one phrase, I was very comfortable being discovered. That was a beautiful fantasy until you start realizing that the hustle was a big thing in NYC. I did something completely unusual for me. In 2009, we had moved to a loft in Chinatown in New York, and I had a lot of space. I decided to dress all the walls with my work, sort of like having a retrospective in my home and studio at all times. Just seeing my work on all the walls was very educational to me. It was jarring and very disturbing for my ex-husband BTW. I am laughing here just with the thought of it. lol. Then I started inviting people to do studio visits. Poets, curators, museum directors, gallerists, friends, non-friends, artists, musicians, people I met socially. In New York, you can be a social butterfly every day. You meet people all the time. It was easy for me to ask: “Do you want to do a studio visit?” They would usually agree. As I kept extending the same invitation over and over, something interesting happened. We were looking at the work, and we were talking about the work. As I was talking about the work, I was listening to myself. Every time I spoke about the work, every time I explained something, every time I answered something, I was hearing my own relationship to the work. I was hearing my own voice. I have to tell you guys, this was the best education. The years 2010 and 2011 became a very important moment for me. I regained the understanding that the work I had created thus far had so much value, and I was becoming a full steward of it. I started expanding my vision of where I wanted the work to reach. The value was already there. I had to recognize it. Recognition and validation have nothing to do with creativity in my sense. Eight years later, life had moved again. I had gone through a divorce in 2015. I made very bad decisions with money in 2016 because I was so desperate to untangle myself from that relationship that I gave priority to cutting off the relationship rather than staying with resources. That was my opportunity cost. In retrospect, that was the price of freedom, a toll in the journey I happily paid… By 2017, I had started studying evolutionary astrology and Human Design. During the Venus retrograde in Scorpio in 2018, I entered another very productive period. I started doing more commission-based work, I decided to leave the middlemen behind. I started reading a lot of astrology charts. I kept studying deeply and committed myself to one-to-one mentorships with astrological teachers for a period of four years. I also added other kinds of practices that shaped the way I do readings and tend to my needs these days. My commitment really paid off. I am already living inside the return on that investment now. Eight years later, I am returning to the same Venus retrograde family from a completely different place. In 2018, I was learning how to rebuild value after a period in which I had lost a lot financially, emo

  3. Sep 22

    THE WHEEL OF CONSCIOUSNESS

    We are right at that point of equal night, equal day, the equinox. The cycle reaches the opposite point from its beginning. What initiated six months ago now exists in relationship to something outside of myself, in relationship to the other. Six months ago was the I AM moment. The beginning. Awareness. Instinct. Emergence. This year that equinox came with Saturn and Neptune together in Aries, already describing something about where we are heading. Three months later, at the summer solstice, the impulse had acquired form. Roots. Identity. Belonging. In the Northern Hemisphere the Sun reached its maximum declination. Now comes the descent. In three months we arrive at the winter solstice, where the outer movement reaches its minimum. Whatever survives becomes seed. We are at that moment the autumn begins at an opposition. In Evolutionary Astrology, the opposition begins the Full Phase. The subjective experience developed through the first half of the cycle encounters objective reality. Almost like a Full Moon. I was born under one. The equinox can be understood as: I meet what my anxieties have created. In spring: What wants to emerge? In autumn: What did that emergence become once it entered relationship with reality? Libra. We enter the descending half of the solar year. The biological world begins moving toward conservation rather than expansion. Energy goes inward. Leaves fall. The movement descends. Something shelters. Something gets released. Something remains. Evolution alternates between outward and inward movement, Yang and Yin, emergence and consolidation. The EA phase model describes that movement clearly. This is annual involution. We just moved through Virgo, discernment. Now Libra asks for equilibrium. What do I want? What do we want? How do desires and needs find a place of integration? The zodiac is its own book. Its own clock about space, time and reality. It shows. Past. Present. Future. Time as space. Cycles inside cycles. The equinox is a coordinate. A change of direction. Look at the four cardinal points and the architecture is there: beginning, culmination, descent, new beginning. And then, only a few days later, the sky repeats the story. The Full Moon on September 26 is in Aries, around 3°. Neptune is there too, retrograde, almost on the same degree. Saturn is retrograde around 12° Aries. Mars, ruler of Aries, is finishing Cancer before entering Leo. Pluto is at the beginning of Aquarius. Uranus is at the beginning of Gemini, Pluto and Uranus remain in trine; Neptune and Pluto in sextile, Neptune and Uranus in sextile too. There is soft geometry in the sky as the cardinal axis is being activated. Mars is also leaving Cancer and squaring Chiron, which has recently moved back into Aries retrograde. Mars rules this Full Moon. The vulnerability of being oneself, of showing one’s own desire, is at stake now, and Mars is doing this from Cancer, from the territory of family, ancestry, belonging and emotional inheritance. What happens when what I want begins to move in a direction that is different from what the family field wants, or from what I have inherited as a way of belonging? I do not have the answer to that. For me, the geometry is different. This Full Moon falls in skip-step with my nodal axis, it activates the cardinal cross around it. The South Node describes an established self-image. The North Node describes the direction of development. So the question for me is very simple: What direction has been trying to reveal itself all year that I can now actually see? It has a lot to do with ancestry. Capricorn. Inheritance. Legacy. Duty. Burden. Responsibility. Guilt. But also, it has a lot to do with opening my heart, pouring all that love into creative forms, and reaching out through my work without creating any expectation of being seen, just being solar all the way. I have Natal Pluto in the 8th house. Current Pluto is squaring my Jupiter-Sun-Mercury Rx in early Taurus. The perspective of my values, my self-validation, and how I internally communicate is being transformed from the inside out. How I meet value has changed. How I evaluate value has shifted. How I validate myself has gone full revamp. I recently surrendered this thought: I do not depend on the value of an inheritance/land to be a person of value. My value shows itself in what I actually meet, day by day. Meeting it means giving up something else, the opportunity cost of every choice made instead of another. That cost, weighed against my essential needs, is what I now call pure leverage. Aries says: I know what I want. I act from instinct. Neptune asks: Where did that desire come from? The desire I used to have is dissolving into something different, something never felt or performed. The beginning that started earlier this year is showing me another possibility, another direction that I am not so much in a rush to conquer, but slowly give shape to. At the same time Pluto is passing through my Ascendant in a three- to four-year cycle, and I am right at the eye of the storm. I am still inside it. I understand the storm while being inside it. I do not know yet how I leave it, but I know that leaving it begins with acknowledging that it is what it is, a storm, becoming aware of what is moving around me and what belongs to me inside it. What can be inherited without having to be repeated? And then, unexpectedly, I started watching Yellowstone. Actually, I became obsessed with Yellowstone, the television series created by Taylor Sheridan, beautifully portrayed in the state of Montana, with the cowboys, the cattle, the land, the families and the history underneath all of it. I have been binging it, and somewhere underneath all the plots I started thinking about preservation. What do we preserve before we innovate? How do we continue evolving without losing what gave us continuity? And at what point does preservation itself stop evolution? The word preservation has also been appearing repeatedly in another part of my life. I am preparing a new public commission in Framingham, Massachusetts, and during my conversations with the people involved in the new judiciary building, preservation kept surfacing. I have a presentation next week, and I am digesting the whole process, discerning. At one point, the architect told me that I had to be careful using the word preservation in the context of the building. I turned around and said, “Oh, really? Interesting. Let’s define preservation from the architectural point of view.”1 It is interesting because I am going to restore and reuse part of the marble from the old building that was built at the beginning of the 20th century. It had multiple uses. It was a high school and became a museum, and now the site is being turned into a regional judiciary center. I do understand the idea of restoration, repair, reuse, and the value of a material, but at the same time, I understand the constraints that she was feeling during my conversation. While I was talking to many people in the community, I had a sense that they want to preserve something about Massachusetts, and then one of the judges said that they basically want something familiar, such as the landscape, or the seasons. Those two words go along with what I’m talking about, but if I define them, they both say that change is dangerous. That’s the tension that we are creating here, within the building, within the system What are the people actually trying to preserve? A structure? A memory? A civic identity? A way of using space? A sense of familiarity? And then another question appears, because familiarity can be supportive, stabilizing, even necessary, and it can become limiting when familiarity hardens into the values a society assumes should remain intact. So preservation is no longer simply about keeping something. It becomes a question of discernment. What deserves continuity because it carries life, and what is being preserved because it is familiar? Land. Survival. Cattle. Food. Territory. Property. Autonomy. Stewardship. The individual and the state. The individual and the collective. Who has the right to occupy and sustain a piece of Earth? Aries, Cancer, Libra, and Capricorn are cardinal. They create a tension between who I am, where I belong, how I am going to find harmony, and what eventually becomes institutional, protective, and supportive. The next axis, Taurus, Leo, Scorpio, and Aquarius, is fixed. What begins in the cardinal signs becomes established, held, and preserved before the mutable signs, Gemini, Virgo, Sagittarius, and Pisces, begin another movement of adaptation. Taurus is what I value.Leo is how I validate myself.Scorpio is how I share those values.Aquarius is how I liberate myself and become my own person. So yes, the land and the territory and the politics are there. Yellowstone is giving me something else to think about in relationship to what is happening in my own family. What are the right decisions? What leverage does each person have? What am I supposed to take from all of this? What am I moving forward with? I do not have those answers. I am in the process of a repartition of inherited property. I do not need to say much more than that. There is ancestry being continued through property and through other people, and the property itself is being divided. And sometimes these partitions create real divisions. Family dramas and grievances usually start much earlier than the property itself. They have to do with how each person perceived belonging inside the system, inside the tribe, and how each one experienced the love, or the lack of love, coming from one parent or both. If the impression was that there was never enough love, enough recognition, enough belonging, then dividing property after the parents are gone can trigger something much older than the property. Especially when there was no trust already created to hold the structure before death. The material division can reactivate

  4. Sep 12

    The witness

    I’m in Framingham, Massachusetts, researching a public artwork called Equilibrium Is a Process, which will take another three years to complete. I’ve spent the week talking to judges, chief magistrates, probation officers, curators, architects, engineers, masons, Uber drivers, and people across the community. The whole week has been about systems, behavior, accountability, trauma, justice, and what actually allows individuals to create different outcomes. I came here to witness. That keeps becoming the position I trust most. I can observe, absorb information, hold a position when necessary, and leave space for things I do not fully understand. The ground has felt unstable lately, and movement has been essential. When I stop, everything comes up. So I move, I observe, and I keep asking what equilibrium actually means when equilibrium itself is a process. At the same time, I was contacted by a major television network about my September 10, 2001 video. I’ve been the custodian of that video for f&cking 25 years, allowing people to publish it, show it, and interview me about it. I agreed to this interview under very specific conditions: they could use a particular excerpt only if the complete artwork was embedded on their website exactly as it exists, with its sound, title, and context intact. The story did not run because they were more interested in protecting themselves from liability than in preserving the rights of an artist who had copyrighted the work, both the images and the music. And that interaction made me realize something very clearly: I no longer have to talk to people about that video or that event. I have done that for 25 years. I have preserved the work, protected its context, answered questions, given interviews, and allowed people access to it. The door has closed. It’s over. Gone. Finito. Bye-bye. I was the custodian of that work, and now custody also means knowing when the work no longer needs to be available to everyone. Some images from my trip: my mind now: Listening to this fabulous episode. I will finish it today before my flight. Refreshing! “Misunderstanding digital reality, maybe the right word is computational reality. As an empirical test of logical statements, if our universe is intelligible and understandable, it needs to pass through the gate of computation to prove that it is logical to actually believe and tell each other ‘true statements.” ~ Nicholas Marino This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.monikabravo.blog/subscribe

  5. Sep 5

    Postmodern Noodle Soup

    Eclipsisms What are we discerning now? Can you reflect on it and see the truth? Oh my god. I did not think I could have survived the tornado of what the eclipsisms was. But here I am, integrating, seeing the same things from a different perspective. Allowing my body to take shape and to speak to me how to integrate what I have been able to witness and where I am going right now. It is an exciting moment, yet I must walk slowly just to make sure that the steps I take are solidly grounded, and where I want to go. The intuition is still the same: being solar, being radiant, being creative. But now with what I have seen, with all the ugliness and anguish, I am more aware that every step I make on a moment to moment basis is defining the shape of the kind of life I am living. I am also conscious of the surface of what I am seeing on the outside that is reflecting what is inside. I am taking my space and my position within the system. Remaining helpful, but not trying to overwrite, to overpower. Being patient, avoiding any urge of control. Being attentive, inquiring into even my place in community. The Mirror of Merging I want to give an example about the way I’ve been relating to relationships in general, and how different they are right now because I am not attaching myself to what it would mean for me to not have those relationships in my life, and what do they mean right now that I’m aware. Throughout my life, whenever I entered a new relationship, it was out of an intense attraction and compulsion, out of an eagerness to merge and to become one with it, to feel transformed by that vitality of it that would last from the beginning until the end. I was never afraid of ending it, but always very concerned about living it fully, fully, because that’s what gave me life. The new awareness is slightly different. I am conscious about the triggers of wanting to merge as one, knowing that with time, that’s going to make me feel resentful and frustrated. Because all I want is to be able to be in true relationship with myself, without the compulsion of the merger, nor the compulsion of fixing, giving, or caring that actually happens at the end of the union when I realize that I have given all to the relationship and am left empty inside. Needs and values have given me leverage over the past ten years since I started becoming conscious of my behavior. Many called that intensity; for me, that was simply my norm until I saw it as a window to explore, and shadow work became a daily practice. In relationships that are being rebirthed again, like the spiral, you do not start where you left off. You start where you are at. If you had left off in a part of the circle and you have already engaged in some reflections and some evolution, you start where you are at. Therefore, because you are in a different place altogether, you can see the difference. If you start in the same place you left, you are going to start reacting out of habit instead of responding from a place of truth. Using inspiration rather than force, using aspiration (breath) rather than fear. I could be in a room alone with myself. The next test of that is always the room with another person, situation, or thing in it. These mirrors keep on appearing, and now they expand to two floors in Massachusetts of a Judiciary building. Equilibrium, Ethics, & Integrity I am going to Massachusetts next week. I started a new Public Art Commission. I am excited. It is going to be in a Judiciary building (Regional Justice Center), designing an artwork that envelopes two floors in the waiting area. What moves me is to create an atmosphere where people can have a place of reflection. The building was designed in a way that there’s a lot of light coming from the outside, so it’s not dark. My work, always colorful, uses geometry. The building won’t be finished until 2028, so we still have time, yet the design has started and needs to be completed in one semester before fabrication. The main concept is that equilibrium is a process. Unlike a flat line, equilibrium moves like emotions or wavelengths, having different moments where rhythms create frequency. The frequency is really the relationship between one point and the other that translates into time. So it is through time that one can see emotional waves as clarity. My intent with the commission is to create a space where people can take their time to inquire by looking at beautiful things that reflect on where their lives sit in relation to choices—such as landscapes, old maps, and city shapes embedded in abstract geometric shapes that stem from surveying the local architecture, shaping the idea of what equilibrium could be. Now, if we go deeper into what ethics means to me in relation to morals: I just have to retreat a little bit to first principles as a foundation where humans can stand. And then integrity as the individual capacity a person has to measure their own ethics. Integrity is the core of humanity, of an individual, and it is what keeps a person aligned with their virtues. Ethics is a practice of virtues such as honesty, excellence, humility, gratitude, generosity, kindness, discernment, and courage. And that creates equilibrium when it is in a state of awareness. People have called me individualistic and I have always responded affirmatively. There is no collective or tribal container without individual ones. Carl Jung put it plainly: the individual is the only real carrier of life, and all collective identity without self-knowledge is just a crutch. Now, my beef is with morality. When that word was translated from the Greek ethos to the Latin moralis, it started shifting because its value was assigned by an external authority outside of the individual. Morality is a curse, and if you are thinking that I do not have any morals, then you have to understand that the morals I do not abide by are the ones that have taken authority outside of the individual and handed it to something outside of yourself. What started as just an insight about eclipse release builds these questions: Where are you standing? What is your integrity? How are you bringing light to your life, and therefore how are you radiating your essence to contribute to humankind? Integrity is mine. Morality is just something society wants to borrow. Postmodern Noodle Soup, instead back to Ancient wisdom Nowadays, society throws around words like Democracy without really understanding their real meaning and connotations, or the current sense of confusion they invite. We live in a Postmodern Noodle Soup where symbols and concepts are stripped of their origins, leaving individuals completely lost because they rarely do the inner inquiry required to know what these words actually mean, what they actually signify, and how to use their meaning properly. A circus, a puppetry of sorts, yapping against each other: please turn the noise off. To decipher the semiotics of our times, we have to tune to the ancient foundations. Look back at what happened to Socrates, who was put on trial by a democratic court in Athens in 399 BC, accused of corrupting the youth and failing to acknowledge the state’s gods, and sentenced to death by drinking hemlock. A democratic vote executed the most virtuous man in the city. Hemlock acts as a progressive neurotoxin. It paralyzes the body from the feet upward, slowly creeping through the system until the respiratory muscles freeze and the victim suffocates while remaining fully conscious. That physical execution is the exact mirror of what happens to a society that abandons self-inquiry. When individuals stop asking questions, stop practicing the Socratic method with themselves, and accept empty symbols without inquiry, a mental hemlock takes over. The mind paralyzes from the ground up. First, you lose the ability to discern truth; then you lose your personal agency; and eventually, the collective suffocates under its own compliance. And this is where the word discipline reveals its real meaning. Discipline shares its root with disciple, from the Latin discere, meaning to learn. A disciple is simply one who learns, and discipline is the devoted, daily practice of what you are learning. We only truly learn within ourselves what we can actually practice. Choosing the right mentors and the right principles allows us to become disciples of life itself. Plato learned from Socrates. Traumatized by the democratic execution of his master, Plato dedicated his life to writing The Republic to expose how unexamined crowds inevitably corrupt justice, before passing his pursuit of wisdom down to his greatest disciple, Aristotle. Aristotle became the absolute foundation of Western civilization as we live it today. In works like the Nicomachean Ethics and Politics, Aristotle taught us that virtue is not a static theory or a set of external rules handed down by authority. Virtue is an active, disciplined practice, a daily habit of how a human decides to achieve equilibrium and live a noble life. At its core, Aristotle shows us how to cultivate good in action, anchoring the central question I carry into my own daily life: How can I do good, not just for myself, but for the common good? What is behavior? It is the way we compose ourselves with ourselves, how we make decisions, and how we keep our integrity. When you do that through relationships, whether one-on-one, with your clan, or collectively, that is what determines the outcome. I do not need to quote the things being spoken in the media, because you all already know. This brings me to praxeology, the science of purposeful human action, which was formally developed in the early 20th century by thinkers like Ludwig von Mises. Grounded in John Locke, Cicero, and Aristotle, Mises showed that praxeology is always intentional: individuals make conscious choices over time to achieve chosen ends. Human action is the root of true economics. Politics is the collective behavior of a ci

  6. Aug 29

    Some Exhaustion Brings Some Closure

    Hey everybody, the Lunar Eclipse was last night, around 12 hours ago, and I had been anticipating this for a while. The good thing about being an astrologer is that nothing comes as a surprise, but even if you know the relationship between the planets, their archetypes, and the power that they have, you cannot really predict. The whole scope is not about prediction, but it’s about understanding the meaning and the potentials, which is the reason why I follow the stars, or they follow me, whichever way you want to see it. It’s been building up for a while, and I can really confirm that the release is here. I have felt it tremendously through a feeling of sorrow, loss, endings, and dissolutions. I actually would like to stay with this feeling for a couple of days if I can, because it’s within the space that I have enabled to sense and feel it in my body. I can really look back and say, “Oh my God, this was coming for a while, and it was being built. It had its crescendo, and now it’s just in the pure state of dissolution.” Not everything is going to be washed away, but certainly there was a lot of cleansing in many ways. What I feel, other than the sorrow, is that there was a lot of confusion. There were veils that were taken off, and I could see a lot of ugly things. At the same time, I did not want to feel defeated. I didn’t want to feel depressed, like anything with a D: defeated, depressed, desolated, disillusioned, desperate. I wanted to be able to feel more attentive to this cycle. I can go 18 years ago and tell you what was going on, or even 36 years ago, but I don’t want to do that exercise to try to figure things out. I want to stay here. I want to stay with the uncomfortable feeling that I had, this morning a little bit after the eclipse. I woke up in the middle of the night, and I had sort of apnea. I couldn’t really breathe, so I had to sit down and listen to Gregorian chants, which I will share below. This is the beautiful Psalm 91 sung by monks in Latin. I had to run some errands today. I had to go to town and do some practical things, like a power of attorney kind of document, so I had to go to a different part of town. I don’t drive, so I had to leave the island of Miami Beach and go to an old part of town called Coral Gables. I just did what I had to do and sent these documents to my brother, there are many things that are being finalized in my family, and they have been building up. I didn’t realize how much I had been carrying. Just to put it in perspective, I’m going to say, from the physiological point of view, (German New Medicine which I have spoken a couple of times in this space.) When I did the immersion in Vancouver with Tiziano, when I came back, I started having a terrible, terrible pain on the right side of my neck, it was unbearable, and I had it for many months. Looking at it from a different perspective, I was saying: what is it that I don’t want to see from another point of view? What is it that I’m stuck on that I don’t want to see? I started seeing, “Oh, I have to have more openness. I have to calibrate more,” and I did. Fast forward a few weeks. I was at the big pool in Flamingo park where I sometimes go, and in a clumsy move, I hit my diaphragm and my ribs on the right side. The pain was unbearable. I couldn’t do hypo-pressives. I couldn’t really swim anymore. It was like three weeks of just waiting for it to heal. It’s completely healed right now, that was also a lesson of patience. I was thinking to myself, “What is it that I’m overholding?” The thorax and the diaphragm really help hold the organs in the body. I was feeling, “What is it that I’m holding in my family? What is it that I’m overprotecting that it is not for me to protect?” That was something to look for. The funny one (it’s just not funny, haha, but it’s funny): a few weeks later, It had been raining in Miami for a while, so I couldn’t really sunbathe as much as I like. I decided to take two days off and just go to the beach from 9:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. I don’t use anything on my skin. It’s fine. I’m a carnivore. I don’t ingest any seed oils. I don’t do any creams, so I’m fine without it. I basically overexposed my skin and never felt pain or anything, but within a week or two, I started noticing that I was peeling off, especially on my face. I was like, “Oh no, what does that mean?” The skin is the last surface of the body that meets the environment, and it’s also how we protect ourselves. I was saying, “Oh, this is interesting. I’m also changing skin. I’m changing the way I’m relating to things because I realized that I needed to have a new perspective. I realized that I could not hold and control the outcome of things that were being very difficult within my family. Therefore, I needed to take off my skin and then embrace a new me.” All of these “symptoms” were already in a state of resolution, which means that the conflict was already carried on, and the resolved symptom appears just to confirm. "The most beautiful part of your body is where it's headed."― Ocean Vuong, Night Sky with Exit Wounds This is what happened with this eclipse. That’s why I feel like mourning pretty much everything that I’ve been doing since I was a child after my father died. That’s the part that is present now. I’m not sad that I feel the sorrow, but I’m not like, “Oh my God, what am I going to do?” No, no, no, no. It’s a different feeling, so I want to share that it’s very intimate. I’m not going to tell details. I don’t care to share them, but they’re not important for anybody other than myself. I am very much improvising to what feels best at that specific moment, so I don’t have any resolution to tell you. I’m not going to do astrology today. Who cares? I’m going to share a set of videos that are beautiful: “The Psalm 91” sung by the Gregorian monks in Latin, just beautiful, but there’s this beautiful record that one of my favorite artists, Nick Cave, recorded. I believe it was 2022. “Seven Psalms,” and I’m just going to play them here below. They’re absolutely beautiful. The eclipse fell on my Saturn’s first house in Pisces. This is where the resolution is. This is where structures are built internally. This is where my sense of authority is not coming from a father figure, but it’s been built throughout time. This is where I can actually see me as an individual, as myself, and that’s where I am right now: complete surrendering to life. "Some nights you are the lighthouse / some nights the sea / what this means is that I don't know / desire other than the need / to be shattered & rebuilt."― Ocean Vuong, Night Sky with Exit Wounds Have you felt any sorrow? Have you felt that there’s something that has shifted and is different? How do you feel in relationship to the beginning of 2026 and now, close to nine months after? What are you looking forward to in the future? As for me, I feel excited when I see the future, but I think there’s still a process to be received in the next two weeks before the new moon on September 10th. I will probably speak more about the upcoming retrogrades with Venus and Mars, Venus supporting intimacy with relationships and Mars discerning about what we choose in our lives to embody our own sense of self. Addendum: This morning, a day later, I woke up to a huge thunderstorm. It has been a while since I didn’t have such an incredible show of light and trembling so close. I grew up with a lot of thunderstorms and we learned to count the seconds between thunder and the cracking sound, apparently it determines the distance. Today, the average was 2 seconds, quite close, it was not frightening, the rhythm was soothing, thus I was like, “Okay, so today’s gonna be a different kind of day.” I want to keep focusing my attention on the little things; perhaps shifting it less on regulating my nervous system since now I know how to respond when things get a little bit off course. Now it’s like, “All right, how do I transform and receive this opportunity into a creative encounter with the light?” It is 11:30 in the morning, and it looks like it was midnight because it’s so dark. I’m going to spend the upcoming hours doing something that I love doing, which is studying and revisiting ancient history. By doing so with curiosity it grounds me, at the same time allows a new perspective fulfilling something that kept me going when I was young, which was curiosity, and knowledge about history that grounded meaning and direction. Seeing things differently from a point of view that I have revisited not once but many times in my life. Have a great weekend. I’ll be back in such a different form. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.monikabravo.blog/subscribe

  7. Aug 22

    Mesmerizing

    What does it make it? Mesmerizing, as soon as there is some light integrating the realm of fantasy, imagination, even of god, with the realm of touching, grounding, earthing, the material that leads us to take action to decide. At times, the decisions can be very blurry, or they cannot be absolutely defined. Since I was little, I was always wanting to stay in this liminal place where I could still be dreaming awake. I would see colors, listen to sounds, and be mesmerized by the stimuli that my senses were perceiving, but was that real, or was that something I was making up? Fast forward many, many years, now I feel that this is how inspiration lands: it lands because I hear something, I see something, I am stimulated by my senses, or even better, by my emotional body. The senses are trying to translate into a form, to a shape, to a sentence, to an idea, into something that must make sense. I like this liminal space that we are in right now in the collective, where most of the things that are revealed are possibly waking more people up. The conspiracy theorist already knew this because we were able to sense these anomalies. We were able to trust our bodies with the knowledge of what really was going to hurt us or not. As an artist, I work not with less is more, but I start with more is more. The more, the merrier. I get stimulated by music or landscape or even just words and ideas, and then I go through a whole journey of accumulation of these, gathering them either printed on the wall or in places that I can have a distance and observe them. This practice is super important, not only in art but in life. The accumulation of stimuli can sometimes distort what we see, our perception. If our perception is distorted, then the narratives we create can have severe consequences. What happens when I can no longer create that distance? “If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear to man as it is: infinite. For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thro’ narrow chinks of his cavern.” — William Blake, The Marriage of Heaven and Hell These times and in the next 18 months, we have the possibility to really grasp beyond this timeline that you perceive as reality. Like Ulysses in The Odyssey, who gets lured by the sirens, it is not his sexual appetite that moves him, but the appetite for knowledge, for knowing what is real in that moment. We all get lured by fantastic shapes, by possibilities of self-glory, by being loved by someone or a whole group of people. In reality, can we really see ourselves? How is our reality mesmerized or not? Odysseus gives me another question: can I listen to the song without surrendering the direction of the vessel? was the danger the song itself? if not, the danger appears when the lure smashes the direction with a false sense of authority. Let us explore the word “mesmerizing.” Etymologically, mesmerism takes its name from Franz Anton Mesmer. He believed that an invisible, universal force could operate through and between bodies, something he called animal magnetism. What passes between a body and an image, between one person and another, between memory and perception, that gives something enough force to enthrall us? I love this word because, throughout my artwork, I have been told many times by my commissioners, clients, and the public that my work has this capacity to mesmerize, to hypnotize, leading directly to Hypnos, sleep. I keep returning to this language throughout this inquiry: dreaming awake, waking up, illusion, delusion, awakening from a dream. Perhaps mesmerization exists somewhere along that threshold, where I am awake enough to perceive and still capable of dreaming what I perceive into another form. In a way, I see myself as mysterious at times because I do not even understand the definition of how I am seen or how I see myself. Depending on the perspective, I could see myself more as a logical intellectual wanting to find out the meaning of things, or sometimes as the loopy, foggy persona that wants to keep things in the mystery because it is a safe place to be. Now, it is neither one nor the other, because I have not been going back and forth. I have been integrating how these qualities served different purposes. I will zoom out a little bit so you can connect to what I am saying. If you zoom out in your life, let us say one month, one year, one decade, and possibly more, and you go back to what was motivating you in your childhood to be curious and fascinated by how reality worked, find yourself in the room when you were a child and see what you were surrounded by: -Did you have musical instruments? -Did you have posters of people that you loved, movies? -Did you have a rack of books? -Did you have a space in the garage that had many tools or vehicles? -Were you always out in the field running around behind a ball, a football, or bouncing one on the court? What kind of motivation was luring you to pay attention to something or someone where you could feel included and feel taken? In my case, it was always between two things: being with a large group of people, laughing, dancing, playing tricks, being a menace for the group because I always had crazy ideas and I was not perhaps the most sane leader in the group. Giggles will lure me, stupid jokes will fascinate me, but at the same time, those are very silent, well-kept, mysterious questions that wanted to go and investigate: -Read books. -Watch movies to get lured by other people’s narratives. -Heavy journaling and always creating something (a young photographer and clothes-maker). -Ponder how reality was possible. -Were the planets real planets? -Could I reach them? -Questions like this simply became: Where did my father go once he crashed his car and perished? -Where do dead people go? -Can I communicate with them? -Can I read his underlined books to find him? -Why do I have to believe religion telling me that he actually is in heaven? -What and where is heaven anyways? The questions, little questions about how things work, became existential, and that has been my path. I got mesmerized by the bigger questions, perhaps induced by the absence of my father or the willingness to be so close to him. I created a whole new reality that mesmerized my life. Only in the last year have I been able to understand this kind of projection, because if we take how projection works, it is fascinating. In order to project something, you need a machine, or a device. You need something that emits light, and it is pointed at the surface. The distance from the lens to the surface is going to determine the size of it. This is where the word projection becomes almost literal in my life, from the Latin proicere, to throw forward. The English word first appears as an alchemical term for casting a powder onto molten metal to transmute it. Something inside throws an image forward. The image lands on a surface outside of me, and distance changes its scale. What I carry inside can suddenly appear enormous simply because of where and how it is being projected. Now, take it that you understand a little bit about lenses. You will have to have the capacity to focus. Use a lens, like the one in the eye, to focus so that what you see is clear or not. Without the focus, you just see smoke or light being projected, but you will not have any refined image. And no one else can focus that lens for me. Someone may point toward the image, question it, love me, confront me, or stand beside me while I look at it, but the adjustment of focus belongs to the person looking through the lens. Even our projections in life, sometimes coming from very strong emotions that were not resolved in childhood (AKA trauma), can create narratives, create images, create opponents, and create enemies. If we feed them and we surround ourselves with situations, people, and things that are feeding that urge, we may arrive at places or situations that are absolutely detached from what we all call reality. I know I am speaking in tongues. I am mostly trying to talk about something that I have been witnessing, but there is no need to tell the details of my life very directly. It brings, at times, pain and it brings joy, depending on what perspective I am looking at. So what feeds a projection until it becomes powerful enough to recreate reality? Repetition? Emotional charge? An unresolved need? The validation of others? The pleasure of finding confirmation for an image we have already decided is true? At what precise moment does fascination become possession? Projection becomes especially hungry when it is trying to fill something that has been missing. Then every new event can become evidence, every person a character, and every coincidence can be recruited into the narrative. All I know is that every day, every morning that I wake up, I want to confront my life with what is the dream and what is the reality that I am building. This idea of mesmerization can be very positive if I am aware that I can create beauty, but at the same time I can create awareness. We are one week away from a very powerful eclipse, and I have been studying a little bit the fixed stars, the guardians of the sky. They do not move or they don’t seem to be moving as they are so far, far away. The angle from which I measure them does. The upcoming eclipse is going to have the fixed star Fomalhaut, the mouth of the fish, the Watcher of the South, directly next to the full moon in Pisces, at 4°. Granted, my Saturn is exactly that degree, so this eclipse is going to land on my first house with the ruler of my South Node. Saturn is the structure I built without a father, from the inside, through my own experience. Fomalhaut asks that vision survive contact with the ground instead of dissolving into fantasy. The eclipse is lighting up the exact site where I already had to become my own architecture. I have Alphecca, Corona Borealis, on my Moon in Scorpio at 12° i

  8. Aug 15

    Shattering reality meets consensus

    The first of the two eclipses of the season just passed, and I have decided not to talk about it without feeling it. There's something quite clear for me: reality has been shattering. It's been broken into many, many different crystals, and each crystal projects its own perspective, its own possible reality that can materialize. Now, there are two things that are very important to question in oneself: Where do I stand in my value?What am I consenting to? I’m going to explore a little bit the recent ingress of the North Node in Aquarius, with Pluto in Aquarius, and the South Node and Sun and Jupiter in Leo squaring Chiron in Taurus. This choreography has been creating both a crisis and a tough confrontation that is so welcome in the collective at many levels. I’m going to choose one subject very specifically, but this also applies to any other subject in your life. I’m going to be speaking of consensus, bitcoin, money, value, but you could take this apart and put health, medicine, Pharma. You could also write schooling, academics, herd mentality, and r3tardation, because I can give you examples today of many things that are happening that are shattering reality. I’m just going to give some hints so you can identify the same ideas also personally, because it all depends if you’re going through this on a personal level. Even though it’s personal, there’s always going to be a reflection of how you relate to the collective in your community. A shared field held together by independent nodes. Consensus belongs to the Aquarian realm when we understand it as a coordination among sovereign individuals. Yet, consensus itself is not automatically Aquarian. It can also become conformity, ideologically captured, or the unconscious rule of the group. In Latin, Consentire means to feel together, to agree to share a perception, and in Bitcoin, consensus has an even more precise meaning. Each participant independently verifies the same rules. No central authority declares what is true. Agreement emerges through verification. But when consensus acts through mandates, imposing itself against property rights and the body, it turns against the individual it was meant to protect. Is consensus something that belongs to the realm of the collective, to the shared field held by many, or does it always risk breaking into a single voice, a single decree standing in for everyone? I feel the pull of the future, the pull of my own sovereignty, my own singular frame, and I have to ask which one is actually mine to protect. A rupture is occurring now, just watch how the earth is shaking around the globe realigning tectonic plates via volcanic eruptions and earthquakes across many continents. I observe this shattering landing directly inside the values Bitcoin was built to protect. When value is held within the relationship, it becomes the meeting point where giving and receiving are embraced. Together they press against a shared intelligence I am watching form in real time, a pattern moving through the network I am part of. This pressure could be the crisis that creates an opening, that confronts my chance to relate to consensus as liberation, the way the world met it as submission six years ago. I know I did not allow the pressure to give in. I am looking at the chart of Bitcoin and its transits right now. I observe where its value is stored, and I ask whether the structure holding it is proven or only assumed. Harmony and relationship meet strategy and clear sight at its very root, and I know peace cannot be bought by giving up the principles that built it. I observe the original emotional image still alive in that chart, the first impulse, the memory of direct action, independence, self custody, the beginning of something that asked no permission from anyone. I watch that territory being claimed again by the collective mind, institutions, labor, infrastructure, hierarchy, regulation, the machinery required to keep something running. I ask whether the commitment behind it still holds together, or whether a shadow has fallen over its purpose while everyone waited for someone else to guard it. The most important thing here is not what other people are doing, but how I am revaluing my own commitment to what Bitcoin really is. Bitcoin does not move forward or backward until the individual takes responsibility for where they are standing. What is money? How am I taking care of my own needs? What just happened > a shattering reality is revealed I watch every actor arrive on stage now, the miners, the developers, the custodians, the corporations, the governments, the influencers, the guardians, each one declaring themselves the keeper of what Bitcoin was originally for. I ask myself if I am one of them, performing guardianship instead of practicing it. Can the individual remain sovereign while participating in the collective field? I do not agree because I trust the network. I agree because I can verify. There’s a fork splitting Bitcoin right now, coming from BIP-110, and it has people fighting over who is right about what Bitcoin even is. We have the clown, or the spook, Michael Saylor calling Bitcoin "digital capital" while turning STRC, his own company's preferred stock, into what he calls "digital credit," paper Bitcoin dressed up as innovation,⁸ and we have others insisting all spam should be stripped from the chain, which is its own kind of discrimination, deciding from the outside what belongs and what does not. Where the needle is, and where the needle should be, is decided by each individual, not by the consensus of everybody. There's a war over what sound custody is, coming from somewhere unannounced, as everyone silently agreed on trusting the field. It’s putting pressure on whether you should be in custody of your own coins, because there have been not one but several security breaches in the last ten days. Self-custody is not something that can be assigned to a third party. Once you choose how to take care of your own value, you become responsible for how that is done. One could say there is an attack coming from the outside, and why not, everything is at stake right now. And that is where I bring the early Pisces lunar eclipse on Bitcoin’s Venus, at 4° Pisces in the seventh house, arriving August 28th. That is the question of how we relate to the agreements we are making, the alliances, the value shared between parties, where we sell ourselves short. That needs to be questioned, and we need to put light into that, because without this discernment, we just merge into a blob without any possibility to choose individually. The eclipse squares Uranus on Pallas Athena in Gemini in the eleventh house, an opportunity for a radical re-patterning of collective intelligence. This is exposing how narratives circulate through the network and how quickly consensus can become manufactured, and that is exactly what is happening. People are taking sides, and people are scared, because what they were standing on before is no longer solid ground. We do not agree because we trust one another. We agree because each of us can verify. What I'm observing from my point of view is that this is happening across many different disciplines, not just Bitcoin. I'm watching it in medicine, and despite the evidence confirming what we, as conspiracy theorists, knew was right because we were following our instinctual protection to our bodies, it was overridden by the consensus of the very weak. They not only signaled us as being murderers. I do not blame Fauci for any of it. I blame the people who complied without ever questioning, the ones who let another man's word replace their own verification. I’m okay with it because I never felt rage, and I felt a sense of relief and release when 99% of the people that I knew walked away from my life. It was actually a very good flush. It was like, “This is what it needed to happen.” I'm also watching it in academics, in the credentials everybody clings to. DEI, diversity, equity, inclusion, is f*cking nonsense, nothing but more division, more judgment, more discrimination dressed as virtue. We're watching the fall of a man put on a pedestal, caught in the very thing he preached against, who chose to end his life rather than stand inside the consequence of being seen for what he was, a mirror of inflated ethos built on the hunger to be seen, not on integrity. A sad story for sure. I am not saying he, or anyone, followed that pattern exactly, this is my own interpretation, laid over a grief that is not mine to carry. But it stands as a mirror of what happens when a whole group of people follow rules so far from their own standing. There is a family grieving, and questions that remain unanswered. I dare to say this despite a person having died. What is it about the collective that you are pursuing without knowing who you are as an individual? The same question stands for every mandate, every rule adopted without asking whether it was ever yours to follow. None of this is a verdict on anyone's life, only a mirror held up to my own. What am I consenting to?What am I verifying for myself?Where have I delegated my authority to the consensus image of Bitcoin?Beneath all of it, what is money? Because the future of Bitcoin may depend less upon achieving collective agreement and more upon whether sovereign individuals still understand the value they are agreeing to preserve. Dialectics, or Why Language and Context Matter The word traces to Greek dialektikē technē, the art of philosophical discussion, from dialektikos, of conversation or discourse, conversation, rooted in dialegesthai, to converse. The deeper components are dia, through or across, and legein, to speak. Dialectic refers originally to a dialogue between two people who hold different points of view about a subject but wish to arrive at the truth through reasoned argument, using logic. They advocate propositions and counter

About

I am OPTimist. I am not willing to be defined by a few words—what I do is a living journey. I am a multidisciplinary artist, empirical polymath, writer, evolutionary astrologer, libertarian/Bitcoiner. My philosophy integrates Eastern, ancestral, and cosmological traditions with psychological inquiries, praxeology, and Austrian economics, emphasizing liberty, value, resources, and self-worth in the quest for individual and societal service. I create public art commissions and immersive environments, facilitate dialogue, and explore freedom, shadow work, myths, natural law, Bitcoin, and the architecture of time. This podcast is a reflection of my living and individuated journey. If you are curious, there is much more to explore in the About Me section.👇☝️ www.monikabravo.blog