The Aevum Accounting Podcast

Aevum Accounting

Navigate the complexities of Australian tax with clarity and confidence. Hosted by AI voices and brought to you by Ben De Rosa, the director of Aevum Accounting Pty Ltd, this podcast cuts through the jargon to deliver expert insights on individual tax returns, business taxation, compliance, and strategic tax planning. Whether you're an individual looking to maximise your refund and understand your obligations, or a business owner aiming for optimal tax structuring and compliance, we provide reliable guidance. Tune in for practical strategies, up-to-date information, and the peace of mind.

  1. 2d ago

    The Line in the Sand, Part Two: Your Business and the 1 July 2027 Reset

    Part two of two. Last week was your property. This week it's the business you own, and the same date: 1 July 2027. The quick recap: from 1 July 2027 the fifty per cent capital gains discount goes to zero for individuals and trusts, replaced by indexation and a thirty per cent minimum tax. The reset protects growth you've already had. Everything is treated as sold on 30 June 2027 and bought back the next day, growth up to that line keeps the discount, and nothing is payable until you actually sell. Mia and Leo are joined again by tax strategist Harvey Green, who starts with the good news: no business has to get a valuation done on 1 July 2027, and plenty won't need one at all. Who it touches depends on what you own and who owns it. If your business sits inside a company and the company sells the business, most of its own assets aren't reset, because a company never had the discount to protect. The shares are different: sell the shares instead and they are reset, so there's a 30 June 2027 figure underneath them. Sole traders, family trusts and each partner in a partnership get the reset on the business assets directly, goodwill included. Plenty of family businesses are a mix, with the company's goodwill generally untouched and the premises in a family trust or the owners' names reset. Last week's formula is still a draft, so for a business, market value is the only route today. Even if it becomes law, a smooth compounding curve fits a business badly, because business value moves in steps. For a business built from scratch it can push most of the growth after the line: start with $1,000 twenty years before the reset, sell for $2 million five years after, and the draft formula puts nearly four-fifths of the growth after it. Then the biggest number in the whole topic. Anything bought before 20 September 1985 and held by the same owner the whole time is pre-CGT, and as a rule the gain is simply ignored. On 1 July 2027 that stops, in every entity, companies included. Everything up to the day stays tax-free; everything after it is taxable. A couple who bought their factory in their own names in 1979, worth $4 million at the reset and sold for $6 million in 2035, would as a rule pay nil today. After the reset, $2 million of growth is in the system. Harvey's advice for these owners: a proper valuation, which can be done after the date, but don't leave it for years. On the small business concessions, three of the four are protected: the 50% active asset reduction, the retirement exemption and the small business rollover. The 15-year exemption isn't on that list. Treasury has drafted a fix, but as of today that bill hasn't been introduced into Parliament, so it isn't law, and pre-CGT owners face a further gap the draft fix doesn't cover. The better news: from 2027-28 the active asset reduction opens up to businesses with turnover under $10 million, up from $2 million, and the 30% minimum is worked out after the concessions. And before you restructure, talk to us first. Treasury's own draft material says some rollovers after the reset could trigger the gain the reset has been holding over. Already an Aevum Accounting client with a business? Bring it to your next catch-up and we'll go through what you own and who owns it. Not a client yet? Visit aevumaccounting.com.au to book a session. Shoutout: A massive thank you to Jane for the fantastic 5-star review! Important Disclaimer: The information shared in this episode and description is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute specific tax or financial advice. Everyone's situation is unique, and tax laws are complex. For personalized advice tailored to your specific situation, we always recommend consulting with a qualified professional at Aevum Accounting.

  2. Oct 7

    The Line in the Sand: Your Property and the 1 July 2027 Reset

    Part one of two. Everything here turns on a date that hasn't happened yet: 1 July 2027. If you own an investment property, something happens to it that day whether you do anything or not, and most people have heard the bad half of it and not the good half. The bad half: from 1 July 2027 the fifty per cent capital gains discount goes to zero for individuals and trusts. In its place your cost base gets indexed for inflation and you pay a minimum of thirty per cent tax on the gain. That is law. It passed in June. The good half, and the part almost nobody has been told: the new rules don't apply to growth you've already had. On 30 June 2027 you're treated as having sold every asset you own, and on 1 July as having bought it all back at what it was worth that day. A sale that never happens, drawing a line in the sand. Growth below the line keeps the fifty per cent discount. Growth above it goes through indexation and the thirty per cent minimum. Nothing is payable on the day. No election, no notification, nothing to report in your 2026-27 return. It's all deferred until you actually sell, and the twelve month rule is untouched. Mia and Leo are joined by tax strategist Harvey Green, who opens by correcting himself. In episode 41 he introduced the reset with a 1982 farm as the example, which left most listeners thinking it was about very old assets. It isn't. It catches essentially every asset an individual or a trust holds on 30 June 2027. Then the question everyone asks: what number goes in the box? Two possible answers, and only one currently exists. A market value at the reset date is the default and right now the only route available. A formula is coming, but the draft Treasury released in August hasn't been registered, so it isn't law and nobody can use it yet. And it won't spread growth evenly, whatever you may have read. It applies a compounding daily growth rate, which lands close to reality for a property that climbed steadily and some distance off for one that sat flat then doubled, or one you renovated. The most useful line in it: you don't choose between them until the tax return for the year you actually sell. Which could be fifteen years away. So no, you don't need a valuation done on 1 July 2027. There's no deadline in the legislation, and the explanatory memorandum never once uses the word valuation. The date is fixed but the report can be written later, and retrospective valuations are ordinary. What waiting costs you is evidence, not eligibility. On your own home: Treasury says plainly the main residence will continue to be exempt, and the exemption itself hasn't been touched. What the Act doesn't do is carve your home out of the deemed sale, and nothing published so far explains how the two meet. Then the rule everyone thinks they understand. The six year rule is not six years of free rental. It only works on a home you lived in first, because the section opens "if a dwelling that was your main residence ceases to be your main residence". Never lived in it and it doesn't switch on at all. When you sell, the gain is apportioned by the days it wasn't your main residence over the days you owned it. Not the days it was rented, so a year sitting empty counts against you too. And moving in later doesn't fix it, however long you stay. Next week: the business side of the same reset. Already an Aevum Accounting client with a rental? Bring it to your next catch-up and we'll go through the dates. Not a client yet? Visit aevumaccounting.com.au to book a session. Shoutout: A massive thank you to Ashlee for the fantastic 5-star review! Important Disclaimer: The information shared in this episode and description is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute specific tax or financial advice. Everyone's situation is unique, and tax laws are complex. For personalized advice tailored to your specific situation, we always recommend consulting with a qualified professional at Aevum Accounting.

  3. Sep 30

    The Machinery: How You Value It, and the Trap That Costs the Most

    Part three of three, and this is the technical half, where the real money is.There are three ways to value meal entertainment. Most small businesses pick the easy one. For most of them it's the wrong one, and we cover all three, including the twelve-week register almost nobody uses.Mia and Leo are joined by tax strategist Harvey Green.The actual method is the default, so if you've never elected anything, this is what you're on. You work out what was spent on your employees and their associates, either exactly or per head, and pay tax on that.The fifty-fifty split is the popular one. Add up everything you spent for the year, staff and clients together, and pay tax on half. No splitting bills, no counting heads. It's easier, and for a lot of small businesses more expensive, because electing it switches off both the minor benefits and business premises exemptions.Here's what that costs. A party for forty people at six thousand six hundred dollars is a hundred and sixty-five dollars a head. On the actual method it's under three hundred, so no fringe benefits tax at all. Elect the fifty-fifty split and three thousand three hundred dollars becomes taxable, on a party that would have cost you nothing. You do get half the spend deductible and half the GST back, but that's a much smaller number than the tax.The recommendation from the team, for most small businesses with a handful of staff: stay on the actual method, don't elect anything, keep your exemptions. The fifty-fifty split earns its place when you're feeding hundreds of people, or when most of your entertainment goes to clients. It just isn't the default choice people assume it is.On the minor benefits exemption, the way most people describe it is wrong. It is not "under three hundred dollars is free". There are two tests, and the dollar figure is only the first. The second is whether it would be unreasonable to treat it as a fringe benefit, judged on how often you provide it, what it adds up to, and whether it's really a reward for work. A formal monthly incentive scheme fails. A one-off voucher for someone who pulled a deadline out of the fire works. And there's no number in the law where it stops, whatever rules of thumb you've heard.Records: five things per occasion. Date, how many people, whether each was an employee or not, cost, and what and where. Your own people need naming; everyone else just counting. What isn't enough is a credit card statement with a total on it.Then the story. A director takes the team to dinner, pays on a personal card, doesn't get reimbursed, and assumes there's nothing to tax because the company never paid. Wrong. If you control the company you're an associate of your own employer, and a benefit from an associate is still a fringe benefit. The company pays tax on a dinner it never paid for, can't deduct a cost it never incurred, and you can't really deduct it personally either. Nobody gets the deduction. Your loan account helps for your own meal, not the team's, because a contribution has to come from the employee who got the benefit. The fix: reimburse yourself.And on whether the tax office is hunting this: their published focus areas are nil returns, employee contributions and cars. Entertainment isn't on the small business list at all. On the radar, but not the blitz it gets described as.Already an Aevum Accounting client? The team will go through it with you at your next catch-up.Not a client yet? Visit aevumaccounting.com.au to book a session.Shoutout: A massive thank you to Mike for the fantastic 5-star review!Important Disclaimer: The information shared in this episode and description is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute specific tax or financial advice. Everyone's situation is unique, and tax laws are complex. For personalized advice tailored to your specific situation, we always recommend consulting with a qualified professional at Aevum Accounting.

  4. Sep 23

    Clients, Gifts and the Footy

    Part two of three. Last week was your own team and the Christmas party. This week it's everyone who doesn't work for you. Same rule the series hangs off: entertainment isn't deductible and you can't claim the GST, unless you pay fringe benefits tax on it. Last week that mostly worked in your favour. This week it doesn't, because fringe benefits tax only applies to employees, and your clients aren't employees. Mia and Leo are joined by tax strategist Harvey Green. Clients, referral partners and suppliers all get the same answer. Your client's share of the meal gets nothing: no fringe benefits tax, but no deduction and no GST credit either. And talking business changes nothing. The law says you're providing entertainment even if business discussions occur. The tax office's own example is a business development manager who attends lunches and cocktail parties specifically to meet new clients, and who can't claim any of it. One narrow exception: if you're both travelling on business, the meals aren't entertainment at all and the employer deducts the lot, including the client's meal. Then the best news in the series. A gift to a client is deductible, and that isn't a technical argument, it's a binding public ruling. The tax office's own example is a renovator sending a client a bottle of champagne, deductible because it was made for the purpose of producing future business. The catch is it only works if the gift isn't entertainment. Ask whether it's consumed on the spot or later. A bottle of wine, a hamper, flowers: enduring, not entertainment. Theatre tickets, a restaurant voucher, a round of golf: immediate, and on a client you get nothing. Which produces the line that makes people laugh. At the same party, the bottle you hand someone at the door is deductible, and the glass you pour them inside is not. Gifts to staff split the same way, with a twist in your favour: a non-entertainment gift under three hundred dollars is exempt and you still get the deduction and the GST credit. An entertainment gift is exempt too, but you lose both. Gift cards need care. Whether a card is entertainment depends on what it can be spent on, and the tax office hasn't published a position on mixed-use cards. Two quieter traps too: buy a card early in a sale and it's valued at what it's worth on the day you hand it over, and on most cards the GST credit goes to whoever redeems it, not you. The footy: tickets to clients get nothing; to staff they're likely exempt under three hundred dollars unless you hand them out all season. And a corporate box is treated completely differently from a seat at the same match. A box, a marquee and an exclusively hired function room are facility hire. A seat, a restaurant table and green fees aren't. Five per cent of a box is advertising, but only if there's signage. And be careful with sponsorship, because an anti-avoidance provision points the other way. The example written into the law is a company paying a thousand dollars to sponsor a football game and getting a viewing box, where the Commissioner can treat the whole thousand as entertainment. And the twenty thousand dollar deduction for small business meals? An election promise. It never became law. Next week, the machinery: the three ways of valuing all this, and what happens when the boss pays for the staff dinner on a personal card. Already an Aevum Accounting client? Bring your entertainment accounts to your next catch-up. Not a client yet? Visit aevumaccounting.com.au to book a session. Shoutout: A massive thank you to Elly for the fantastic 5-star review! Important Disclaimer: The information shared in this episode and description is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute specific tax or financial advice. Everyone's situation is unique, and tax laws are complex. For personalized advice tailored to your specific situation, we always recommend consulting with a qualified professional at Aevum Accounting.

  5. Sep 17

    Coffee, Clients and the Christmas Party: What You Can Actually Claim

    It's party-booking season, so here's the question every business owner asks in October: can I claim it? This is part one of three, and it runs on one rule. Entertainment isn't tax deductible and you can't claim the GST on it, unless you pay fringe benefits tax on it. One way or the other, never both. Then the twist that catches everyone. When an exemption applies to entertainment, you don't just avoid the tax, you lose the deduction and the GST credit too. Usually still the better outcome, at forty-seven per cent against a deduction worth twenty-five or thirty cents, but not what people expect. Mia and Leo are joined by tax strategist Harvey Green. Today is your own team, and the Christmas party. Next week is everyone who doesn't work for you. The week after is the machinery underneath it all. Is it entertainment? Four questions: why, what, when and where. Why did you provide it, and what did you actually provide, matter most. And alcohol is close to decisive. The tax office says plainly that if alcohol is provided at the morning or afternoon tea or light lunch, you are providing entertainment. Feeding your own team: tea, coffee and biscuits in the office kitchen are clean. Deduct them, claim the GST, no fringe benefits tax. Sandwiches at a working lunch, same. Put beers in the fridge on a Friday and it becomes entertainment, but it's still on your premises, so there's nothing to pay. You just lose the deduction. Add wine to the afternoon tea and the same thing happens. The cafe downstairs is a different answer, and not the way most people assume. The tax office's own ruling lists cafes among the places where food is more likely to be entertainment, not less. All that saves you is the minor benefits exemption, and their own failure example is weekly staff lunches at forty-five dollars a head. Low value, but regular. And feeding someone working from home doesn't get the premises exemption at all, because the law says business premises doesn't include an employee's residence. The Christmas party, properly: there are four separate things happening at one and most people treat it as one thing. Your employees' food and drink on your premises is exempt. Their partners are not covered by that exemption, though because their share is taxable, the deduction comes back on it. The band is a different category again. And the gifts are looked at separately from the party. Which produces something useful. The three hundred dollar threshold is tested on each benefit, not on the total per head, so a four-hundred-and-thirty-dollar-a-head party can come out at zero fringe benefits tax. Not automatically, though, because clearing three hundred on each item is only the first of two tests. And the part people get caught by: it's a cliff, not a step. Go one dollar over on any single benefit and the whole of that benefit is taxed, not just the excess. All of it depends on records. A credit card statement with a total on it is not enough. Next week: clients, referral partners, gifts and the footy, including the best news in the series. Already an Aevum Accounting client? Bring it up at your next catch-up and the team will go through your accounts with you. Not a client yet? Visit aevumaccounting.com.au to book a session before the party season. Shoutout: A massive thank you to Jordan for the fantastic 5-star review! Important Disclaimer: The information shared in this episode and description is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute specific tax or financial advice. Everyone's situation is unique, and tax laws are complex. For personalized advice tailored to your specific situation, we always recommend consulting with a qualified professional at Aevum Accounting.

  6. Sep 11

    The Trust Tax Wasn't Dropped: What the Draft Law Actually Says

    You may have read that the Treasurer dropped the trust tax. He didn't. What happened on 3 September is that the draft legislation landed, and with it a new way to stay out of the tax without restructuring. The 30% minimum tax on discretionary trusts still starts on 1 July 2028, and it's the last of the big Budget measures still to pass. Mia and Leo are joined by tax strategist Harvey Green, who fronted our Budget night episode and starts by correcting his own advice from May. In this episode, we cover: How It Works: The trustee pays 30% on the trust's taxable income before it goes anywhere. Beneficiaries still declare their share and get a credit — but it's non-refundable. Already on 30% or more? Very little changes. Streaming income to someone on a low rate? The difference is simply gone. Bucket Companies: Company beneficiaries get no credit at all. $100 of trust profit loses $30 at the trust, then the company is taxed on its full share again. Treasury designed it that way on purpose. Bendel, Briefly: June's High Court decision said an unpaid entitlement owed to a bucket company isn't a Division 7A loan. The government says it will legislate on unpaid entitlements separately, so that door is closing. Path One — Do Nothing: If everyone you distribute to is already on 30% or more and there's no bucket company, it costs you close to nothing. Treasury reckons roughly half of all discretionary trusts won't pay more in a given year — do the sum to know you're in that half. Path Two — Elect Fixed Distributions: The new option, and the reason for the "dropped it" headlines. Nominate beneficiaries with fixed percentages adding to 100%, and the trust is treated like a fixed trust with no minimum tax. Nothing transfers, so no stamp duty, and a bucket company can be nominated. But it's one-shot — it must be made in 2028–29 or never — you give up all discretion, percentages only change on death or separation, and breaking it revokes it permanently and taxes that whole year at the top rate plus Medicare. Path Three — Restructure: A rollover window from 1 July 2027 to 30 June 2030, now open to any discretionary trust of any size — broader than we said on Budget night. All assets, one transferee, four-year clawback. And no stamp duty relief, which is the whole problem for land-rich trusts. Who's Out: Super funds, fixed trusts, special disability trusts, deceased estates and charitable trusts. Genuine testamentary trusts. Primary production income — it's the income that's excluded, not the farming trust, so rent and interest are still caught. Vulnerable-minor income. Anything paid to a registered charity or DGR. And wages: if a family member does real work in the business, pay them a real wage, as Treasury itself suggested. Four things to do this month: model what the minimum tax would have cost you last year, get the trust deed out and read it, price the stamp duty on a restructure if you hold land, and clean up what your bucket company is owed. And one thing not to do: don't restructure on a draft. The law isn't final and the rollover window doesn't open until 1 July 2027. Already an Aevum Accounting client? You don't need to chase this. If and when it becomes law, the team will be contacting every client with a trust to book a meeting and go through the options properly. Not a client yet? Visit aevumaccounting.com.au to book a session and have your trust modelled under all three paths. Shoutout: A massive thank you to James for the fantastic 5-star review! Important Disclaimer: The information shared in this episode and description is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute specific tax or financial advice. Everyone's situation is unique, and tax laws are complex. For personalized advice tailored to your specific situation, we always recommend consulting with a qualified professional at Aevum Accounting.

  7. Sep 3

    Payday Super: Two Months In, and What's Actually Biting

    Payday Super went live on 1 July. Two months in, the pattern of what's going wrong is clear — and it's rarely what employers expected. Almost everyone gets this backwards: it isn't a cost increase. The rate is still 12%, the same people qualify, and for most employers the amount is identical to last year. What changed is the timing. And the timing is what's catching people. Mia and Leo are joined by tax strategist Harvey Green for the practical version. We previewed this in Episode 33; this is what it feels like to actually run payroll under it. In this episode, we cover: "Received", Not "Sent": The contribution has to land in the employee's fund within 7 business days of payday, with enough information to allocate it. Your clearing house's processing time is now your problem. The Business Day Trap: A business day excludes any day that's a public holiday for the whole of any state or territory. A Northern Territory holiday removes a business day for the entire country — but a part-state holiday like the Royal Hobart Show doesn't. You can't just count weekdays. The Clearing House Is Gone: The ATO's Small Business Superannuation Clearing House shut entirely on 1 July. It was free and widely used, and if you hadn't replaced it before your first July pay run, you've had a rough two months. Easily the most common problem we've seen. Qualifying Earnings Isn't the Bogeyman: New term, but the ATO is explicit that for most employers it doesn't change the amount. The only real addition is commissions for work done entirely outside ordinary hours. The Cash Flow Half Nobody Mentions: Under quarterly super you always held money that was owed but not yet due, and plenty of businesses were quietly using it as working capital. That buffer is gone. Same annual cost, no rolling balance. The Rebuilt Super Guarantee Charge: You no longer self-assess it — the ATO does, from your Single Touch Payroll data every pay run. Interest compounds daily. There's an administrative uplift that shrinks if you disclose voluntarily. And for the first time, the charge is tax deductible. Penalties actually fell too — from up to 200% down to 25% or 50%. When You Get More Than 7 Days: Twenty business days for a new employee's first contribution, and out-of-cycle payments like a Christmas bonus ride along with the next regular payday. Funds Now Have 3 Days, Not 20: To allocate or return a contribution. Errors surface far faster, so your employee data quality matters more than it used to. Contractors Just Got Riskier: The rule hasn't changed — contractors paid mainly for their labour are employees for super purposes. But with per-pay-run reporting, a long-standing misclassification is a much shorter fuse. Four things to check this week: whether contributions are actually arriving in seven days, what replaced your clearing house, whether you pay out-of-hours commissions, and how clean your employee data is. And if you've already missed some, come forward. Voluntary disclosure reduces the uplift and the charge is deductible now. The worst version is being found by a system that watches every pay run. Connect with Aevum Accounting: Not sure your contributions are landing on time? Visit aevumaccounting.com.au to book a session with the expert team today. Shoutout: A massive thank you to Vikaash for the fantastic 5-star review! Important Disclaimer: The information shared in this episode and description is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute specific tax or financial advice. Everyone's situation is unique, and tax laws are complex. For personalized advice tailored to your specific situation, we always recommend consulting with a qualified professional at Aevum Accounting.

  8. Aug 25

    The Medicare Levy, the Surcharge, and the Cover That Doesn't Count

    Three different things, one confusing name. The Medicare levy, the Medicare levy surcharge, and private health insurance all interact — and getting them mixed up is quietly costing people thousands. In this episode, Mia and Leo separate them properly: who actually pays, who's exempt, what kind of cover gets you out of the surcharge, and the policies that look like the real thing but do nothing at all. We lead with the 2025-26 figures, because that's the return most people are lodging right now, and flag the 1 July increases as we go. In this episode, we cover: The Levy vs the Surcharge: The levy is 2% and almost everyone entitled to Medicare pays it. The surcharge is a separate charge, on top, only for higher earners without hospital cover. Same name, different rules. Who's Exempt: Serving defence force members entitled to full free medical treatment, and DVA Gold Card holders — full exemption if the whole family is in the same position, half if a spouse or dependants still use Medicare. Worth checking, because we see people who've paid it for years. Visa Holders and the Statement: If you're not entitled to Medicare, you may be exempt — but you need a Medicare Entitlement Statement from Services Australia, and you need to hold it when you lodge. The Nationality Trap: Australia has reciprocal agreements with eleven countries, including the UK, Ireland and New Zealand. Those citizens do get Medicare access, so they generally can't claim exemption. Two people on the same visa, doing the same job, get different answers based on their passport. The Surcharge Tiers: For 2025-26, singles start at $101,001 and families at $202,001, rising through 1%, 1.25% and 1.5%. From 1 July 2026 those become $105,001 and $210,001. A Cliff, Not a Slope: At $118,000 the surcharge is $1,180. At $118,001 it's about $1,481 — because the higher rate applies to your whole income. One dollar costs roughly $301. Extras Doesn't Count: Only hospital cover exempts you. People pay for private health insurance every month and still pay the surcharge, because their policy is extras-only. Your Excess Is Capped: To exempt you, the yearly excess can't exceed $750 for a single or $1,500 for a family. Sort a comparison site by cheapest and you'll often land on a policy that doesn't do the one job you bought it for. Suspending Counts as Uncovered: Suspend your cover while you're overseas and you'll pay the surcharge for every suspended day. Overseas Visitors Cover Doesn't Work: It's not a complying policy. No surcharge exemption, no rebate. If you're liable, you need a complying Australian policy in addition to the overseas cover, not instead of it. Do the Sum Properly: Compare the surcharge against the premium after the rebate, not the sticker price — a $1,200 policy is closer to $911 for most people under 65. The Clock Before You Turn 31: Lifetime Health Cover loading adds 2% for every year you wait past 30, capped at 70%. And the rebate doesn't apply to the loading, so it stings more than it looks. Ten continuous years of cover and it comes off. Most of this is checkable in an afternoon, and if it's wrong this year it's probably been wrong for a few. Amendments are often available. Connect with Aevum Accounting: Not sure which of these applies to you? Visit aevumaccounting.com.au to book a session with the expert team today. Shoutout: A massive thank you to Zoe for the fantastic 5-star review! Important Disclaimer: The information shared in this episode and description is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute specific tax or financial advice. We are not insurance advisers. Everyone's situation is unique, and tax laws are complex. For personalized advice tailored to your specific situation, we always recommend consulting with a qualified professional at Aevum Accounting.

See All (63)

About

Navigate the complexities of Australian tax with clarity and confidence. Hosted by AI voices and brought to you by Ben De Rosa, the director of Aevum Accounting Pty Ltd, this podcast cuts through the jargon to deliver expert insights on individual tax returns, business taxation, compliance, and strategic tax planning. Whether you're an individual looking to maximise your refund and understand your obligations, or a business owner aiming for optimal tax structuring and compliance, we provide reliable guidance. Tune in for practical strategies, up-to-date information, and the peace of mind.

Information