The teacherhallpass’s Podcast

teacherhallpass
  • 5.0 (4)
  • Self-Improvement
  • Updated Weekly

Hall Pass is the podcast for teachers on the edge of burnout - or already deep in it - who are ready to stop surviving and start reclaiming their sanity. Hosted by a longtime educator who has been in the trenches (and the staff meetings), this show is your permission slip to question the system, protect your energy, and redefine what it means to be a ”good teacher.” Expect honest conversations, short bursts of real talk, and practical ways to take your life back - without quitting your job tomorrow (unless that’s your plan). No toxic positivity. No glitter. Just the pass you didn’t know you needed.

Episodes

  1. 4d ago

    S2E5 - The Agency Problem - When Control Replaces Trust

    Program Notes & Sources This episode examines the institutional reflex toward control — and the double bind it creates for teachers and students alike. The sources below span organizational psychology, educational policy research, philosophy, and motivation science. Together they make the case that control-based systems are not just ineffective — they are actively counterproductive to the goals they claim to serve. On Institutional Control and Surveillance Michel Foucault - Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1975) Foucault’s analysis of how institutions shape behavior through surveillance and normalization remains one of the most penetrating frameworks for understanding what happens inside schools, workplaces, and any system where visibility is used as a control mechanism. His concept of the panopticon — a structure in which people behave as if they are always being watched, regardless of whether they actually are — describes something that plays out in classrooms and staffrooms every day. This is not light reading, but it is worth the effort for anyone who wants the philosophical foundation for what this episode argues. A more accessible entry point: David Lyon — Surveillance Society (2001) On Autonomy, Trust, and Organizational Psychology Edward Deci & Richard Ryan — Self-Determination Theory As established in Episodes 2 and 4, SDT is foundational here. The research consistently shows that controlling environments — characterized by mandates, surveillance, and external pressure — undermine intrinsic motivation and produce compliance at the expense of genuine engagement. This applies to teachers as much as to students. Key finding relevant to this episode: autonomy support from administrators predicts autonomy support from teachers, which predicts student engagement. The trust — or its absence — flows through the system in both directions. Daniel Pink — Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us (2009) Pink synthesizes the SDT research for a general audience and applies it to workplaces and organizations. His argument — that autonomy, mastery, and purpose are the conditions for genuine motivation, not rewards and punishments — is directly relevant to everything this episode argues about what gets lost when control replaces trust. More accessible than the academic literature and a useful starting point. On Teacher Autonomy and Professional Development Linda Darling-Hammond — research on teacher development and school reform Darling-Hammond is one of the most rigorous researchers working on what actually improves teacher effectiveness. Her work consistently shows that sustained, substantive professional development — not one-day workshops or mandated curricula — is the primary driver of improved student outcomes. Her research makes the case that investing in teachers is not a soft priority. It is the highest-leverage intervention available to a school system. • Linda Darling-Hammond — The Flat World and Education (2010)  • Linda Darling-Hammond — Powerful Teacher Education (2006) Andy Hargreaves & Michael Fullan — Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School (2012) Hargreaves and Fullan argue that the solution to educational underperformance is not more control but more professional capital — the combination of human capital (individual teacher skill), social capital (collaborative professional relationships), and decisional capital (the professional judgment built through experience). Their framework is a direct rebuttal to the logic of canned curricula and scripted lessons. On Standardization, Equity, and the Guaranteed Curriculum Robert Marzano —On Standardization, Equity, and the Guaranteed Curriculum Robert Marzano — research on guaranteed and viable curriculum Marzano’s work on curriculum design established the concept of a guaranteed and viable curriculum — ensuring that all students have access to the same core content regardless of which teacher they happen to get. This is the legitimate goal that this episode acknowledges before examining its unintended consequences. The equity argument for standardization is real. The question this episode raises is not whether the goal is worth pursuing, but whether the method — control rather than investment — serves the goal or undermines it. W. James Popham — The Truth About Testing (2001) Popham, a measurement specialist, offers a rigorous critique of how standardized testing has shaped curriculum in ways that were never intended — narrowing instruction, crowding out non-tested subjects, and producing the teaching-to-the-test dynamic that this episode describes. On the Loss of Play, Recess, and Unstructured Time Peter Gray — Free to Learn (2013) As referenced in Episode 1, Gray’s research on the decline of unstructured play and its developmental consequences is directly relevant here. The squeeze on recess, free time, art, and hands-on learning described in this episode is documented in detail in Gray’s work, along with the cognitive and social costs of that squeeze. American Academy of Pediatrics — policy statement on the importance of play The AAP has been explicit: play is not a break from learning. It is a primary mechanism of learning, particularly in early childhood. Their policy statements provide a research-grounded case for protecting unstructured time in schools. On Burnout and the Conditions That Produce It Christina Maslach — burnout research Maslach’s identification of the six organizational risk factors for burnout — workload, control, reward, community, fairness, and values — maps almost perfectly onto the conditions this episode describes. The combination of high demand, low control, and minimal support is not just demoralizing. It is a documented pathway to burnout.  • Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. — The Truth About Burnout (1997) Emily & Amelia Nagoski — Burnout: The Secret to Unlocking the Stress Cycle (2019) A more recent and accessible treatment of burnout, with particular attention to the experience of people in helping professions. Relevant to teachers specifically. On the Foucault Reference — A Note Michel Foucault is sometimes treated as a figure belonging exclusively to academic philosophy or critical theory. His work is worth claiming for practical purposes. His observation that surveillance changes behavior — that people perform differently under the possibility of being watched, regardless of whether they actually are — is not a philosophical abstraction. It is a description of something that happens in every classroom where students know their work is being monitored, every staffroom where teachers know their pacing is being tracked. The performance that results is not engagement. It is the appearance of engagement. Which is exactly the compliance problem Episode 4 named — and which control-based systems consistently reproduce rather than solve. The Parallel — A Note for Educators This episode makes an argument that I want to state plainly in these notes, because it is the argument I most want educators to take into their professional conversations: The conditions that produce genuine engagement in students are the same conditions that produce genuine engagement in teachers. Autonomy. Competence development. Meaningful connection. A sense that your judgment matters and your work is worth investing in. You cannot build those conditions for students inside systems that deny them to teachers. If this argument resonates with you — if you are a teacher who has felt the double bind this episode describes — the research above gives you the language and the evidence to name it. In a staff meeting. In a conversation with an administrator. In a union negotiation. In a letter to a school board. The argument is not “leave us alone.” It is “invest in us the way you want us to invest in our students.” That is a reasonable ask. And it is backed by fifty years of research. Music by Aaron Paul - Whispers in the Dark The Agency Problem is produced independently. No sponsors. No agenda beyond the work. I worked with AI tools in developing this series — as thought partners and editors, not as authors. Everything in here came from two decades in classrooms. The AI helped me find the words. Questions, thoughts, or responses to this episode: teacher.hallpass@gmail.com

  2. Jul 1

    S2E4 - The Agency Problem - Compliance is Not Engagement

    On Intrinsic Motivation and the Limits of External Measurement Edward Deci & Richard Ryan — Self-Determination Theory As established in Episode 2, Deci and Ryan’s research is foundational here. Their distinction between controlled motivation (doing something because of external pressure) and autonomous motivation (doing something because it aligns with genuine interest or values) maps directly onto the compliance vs. engagement distinction this episode makes. The critical finding: systems that reward compliance actively undermine the intrinsic motivation required for genuine engagement. You cannot mandate engagement. You can only create conditions that make it possible. • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. • Edward Deci — Why We Do What We Do (1995) On Rewards, Grades, and the Undermining of Learning Alfie Kohn — Punished by Rewards (1993) and The Schools Our Children Deserve (1999) Kohn’s work is the most direct popular treatment of how grading and reward systems produce compliance at the expense of genuine learning. His argument — that grades shift students’ focus from learning to grade management — is directly relevant to the student described in this episode’s cold open. Key insight: when the metric becomes the goal, the metric stops measuring what it was designed to measure. This is sometimes called Goodhart’s Law, and it applies to education as much as it applies to economics. Alfie Kohn — Punished by Rewards remains the most accessible entry point. For a more education-specific treatment: The Schools Our Children Deserve (1999). On Assessment and What Gets Measured Dylan Wiliam — research on formative assessment Wiliam is one of the most rigorous researchers working on educational assessment. His work distinguishes between assessment that informs learning (formative) and assessment that merely records compliance (summative, when misapplied). His research consistently shows that what gets assessed shapes what students actually do — and that most assessment systems are measuring the wrong things. • Dylan Wiliam — Embedded Formative Assessment (2011) — practical and research-grounded Goodhart’s Law Originally an economic principle — “when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure” — Goodhart’s Law applies with uncomfortable precision to educational metrics. Grade inflation, assignment completion rates, and standardized test scores all illustrate the same dynamic: once the measurement is the goal, people optimize for the measurement rather than the thing the measurement was supposed to represent. On Engagement as a Distinct Construct Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi — Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (1990) Flow — the state of complete absorption in a genuinely challenging task — is the far end of the engagement spectrum. Csikszentmihalyi’s research defines the conditions under which genuine engagement becomes possible: clear goals, immediate feedback, challenge matched to skill. None of these conditions are produced by compliance-based systems. Engagement research in education: Researchers including Jennifer Fredricks, Phyllis Blumenfeld, and Alison Paris have developed frameworks distinguishing behavioral engagement (compliance), cognitive engagement (genuine mental effort), and emotional engagement (investment and interest). Their work makes the case that behavioral engagement — the kind schools typically measure — is the least predictive of actual learning outcomes. • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. On Discussion-Based Learning and Visible Thinking Project Zero — Harvard Graduate School of Education Project Zero has spent decades researching what genuine thinking looks like in classrooms and how to make it visible. Their “Thinking Routines” framework is built on exactly the distinction this episode makes: the difference between producing an answer and actually thinking. pz.harvard.edu Paulo Freire — Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1968) Freire’s critique of what he called the “banking model” of education — in which students are treated as empty vessels to be filled with information — is one of the most enduring arguments against compliance-based schooling. Students are not passive recipients. When treated as such, they become passive performers. On Teacher Burnout and the Performance Dynamic Christina Maslach — burnout research The relational cost of compliance described in this episode — the loneliness of performing teaching to an audience performing learning — connects directly to Maslach’s dimension of depersonalization in burnout. When genuine human contact is replaced by performance on both sides, something essential drains out of the work. • Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. — The Truth About Burnout (1997) On the Long-Term Cost of Compliance Training The argument that compliance training teaches students a “lesson with a very long shelf life” — that appearance of competence is as good as competence — connects to research on academic dishonesty, credential inflation, and the gap between educational attainment and actual skill development. Bryan Caplan — The Case Against Education (2018) Caplan’s controversial but data-rich argument is that much of what education produces is signaling — the appearance of competence — rather than actual human capital development. Whether you agree with his conclusions or not, his documentation of the gap between credentials and skills is directly relevant to what this episode argues. A Note on the Noise Question This episode deliberately complicates the argument by acknowledging that noise is not synonymous with engagement, and quiet is not synonymous with compliance. The research on this is consistent: what predicts learning is not the surface environment but the internal cognitive and emotional state of the learner. For a practical framework on designing for genuine engagement rather than compliance, the Self-Determination Theory applications in education literature — particularly the work of Johnmarshall Reeve referenced in Episode 2 notes — remains the most research-grounded starting point. The Agency Problem is produced independently. No sponsors. No agenda beyond the work. I worked with AI tools in developing this series — as thought partners and editors, not as authors. Everything in here came from two decades in classrooms. The AI helped me find the words. Questions, thoughts, or responses to this episode: teacher.hallpass@gmail.com music is The Other Side by Aaron Paul

  3. Jun 16

    S2 The Agency Problem E3 - The Capacity Problem

    Episode 3: The Capacity Problem Program Notes & Sources Music: Whispers in the Dark by Aaron Paul - Low Main version This episode draws on neuroscience, stress biology, and nervous system research to explain why capacity — not ability — is the limiting factor for many students who appear disengaged. The sources below represent decades of rigorous research. None of it is fringe. All of it is relevant to anyone who works with, lives with, or is a young person. On Stress Biology and the Brain Robert Sapolsky — Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers (2004) Sapolsky is a neuroendocrinologist at Stanford and one of the clearest science writers alive. This book is the definitive popular treatment of chronic stress; what it does to the body, the brain, and behavior. The chapters on how stress affects cognition, memory, and decision-making are directly relevant to everything this episode argues about the overwhelmed student. Also worth your time: Robert Sapolsky — Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst (2017) A broader look at the biological underpinnings of human behavior. The sections on the adolescent brain and stress are particularly relevant to this series. On the Autonomic Nervous System and Shutdown States Stephen Porges — Polyvagal Theory Porges is a neuroscientist whose work on the autonomic nervous system fundamentally changed how researchers and clinicians understand threat response, social engagement, and shutdown. His framework — the three states of ventral vagal engagement, sympathetic mobilization, and dorsal vagal shutdown — explains the “nothing” look that this episode describes in ways that behavioral models simply cannot. Starting points: Stephen Porges — The Pocket Guide to the Polyvagal Theory (2017) — the most accessible entry point Deb Dana — The Polyvagal Theory in Therapy (2018) — a practitioner-friendly application of Porges’ work, written for therapists but useful for anyone working with dysregulated people The concept of neuroception — the below-conscious process by which the nervous system scans for safety — is particularly important for educators. Students are not choosing shutdown. Their nervous systems are choosing it for them. On Allostatic Load and Cumulative Stress Bruce McEwen — research on allostatic load McEwen, a neuroscientist at Rockefeller University, developed the concept of allostatic load — the cumulative wear on the body and brain from sustained stress. His work explains why chronic low-level stressors are as damaging as acute ones, and why baseline stress levels matter as much as in-the-moment demands. Key concept for educators: students are not blank slates when they walk through the door. They arrive with a stress load already accumulated. Understanding that load changes how you interpret what you see in the classroom. On Cognitive Load and Learning Cognitive Load Theory — John Sweller Sweller’s research established that working memory has a finite capacity, and that learning breaks down when that capacity is exceeded. While his work focuses on instructional design rather than emotional stress, it connects directly to what this episode argues: the brain can only manage so much at once, and stress competes directly with learning for those resources. On Boredom, Understimulation, and the Seeking Brain Jaak Panksepp — affective neuroscience and the SEEKING system Panksepp identified the SEEKING system — a primary emotional system in the brain that drives curiosity, exploration, and the pursuit of reward. This system doesn’t switch off when students are bored. It redirects. The student finding workarounds in security filters is a SEEKING system looking for a target. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi — Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (1990) As noted in Episode 2 program notes, Csikszentmihalyi’s flow research is directly relevant here. Chronic understimulation is as much an enemy of flow as chronic overwhelm. Both put the brain outside the zone where genuine engagement is possible. On Adolescent Brain Development Frances Jensen with Amy Ellis Nutt — The Teenage Brain (2015) Referenced in Episode 1 notes and relevant again here. The adolescent brain’s heightened sensitivity to novelty and reward makes understimulation particularly costly during this developmental window. A brain wired for challenge, sitting in an environment that doesn’t provide it, will find challenge elsewhere. On Co-Regulation and the Role of Adults The concept of co-regulation — the way a calm, connected adult presence can help regulate a dysregulated nervous system — is drawn from attachment theory and polyvagal research. It is not a soft idea. It is a neurological one. Key researchers: John Bowlby — attachment theory foundations Dan Siegel — The Whole-Brain Child (2011, with Tina Payne Bryson) — accessible application of neuroscience to working with young people The implication for teachers: your regulated presence is not background noise. For some students, it is the primary condition that makes engagement possible. That is both a significant responsibility and, I’d argue, a significant source of meaning in the work. A Note on the Two Kinds of Capacity Problems This episode argues that understimulation and overwhelm produce nearly identical surface behavior — and require nearly opposite responses. This distinction is not widely recognized in educational policy or practice, which tends to treat all disengagement as a single problem requiring a single solution. If this episode resonated with you, the sources above will give you the research foundation to make that case — in a parent conference, a staff meeting, or a conversation with an administrator who is reaching for the wrong lever. The Agency Problem is produced independently. No sponsors. No agenda beyond the work. I worked with AI tools in developing this series — as thought partners and editors, not as authors. Everything in here came from two decades in classrooms. The AI helped me find the words. Questions, thoughts, or responses to this episode: teacher.hallpass@gmail.com

  4. Jun 2

    S2 Agency Problem E2

    Program Notes & Sources This episode builds the theoretical foundation for the entire series. Self-Determination Theory is not a trend or a framework du jour — it is one of the most rigorously tested bodies of research in psychology, developed over five decades and replicated across cultures, age groups, and contexts. The sources below are the real thing. Follow them if something in this episode made you want to go deeper. The Foundation: Self-Determination Theory Edward Deci & Richard Ryan Deci and Ryan developed Self-Determination Theory beginning in the 1970s at the University of Rochester. Their work identified autonomy, competence, and relatedness as universal psychological needs — not preferences, not personality traits, but needs in the same category as food and sleep. The landmark academic paper: Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. For a readable, non-academic entry point: Edward Deci — Why We Do What We Do: Understanding Self-Motivation (1995) This book translates the research into plain language without dumbing it down. It’s the version I’d hand to a teacher or a parent. The official SDT research hub — papers, summaries, and applications across education, healthcare, and work: selfdeterminationtheory.org On Intrinsic Motivation and the Overjustification Effect Edward Deci — original studies on extrinsic rewards undermining intrinsic motivation (1971) Deci’s early experiments showed that introducing external rewards for activities people already found interesting reduced their intrinsic interest in those activities. This finding was controversial and has been replicated extensively. Alfie Kohn — Punished by Rewards (1993) Kohn synthesizes the research on rewards and motivation for a general audience and applies it directly to schools and workplaces. Blunt, well-sourced, and still relevant. If the overjustification effect surprised you, this book will change how you see gold stars, grades, and bonus structures. On Autonomy Support in Education Johnmarshall Reeve — research on autonomy-supportive teaching Reeve has spent decades studying what autonomy support looks like in actual classrooms — the specific teacher behaviors that increase student engagement versus those that undermine it. His work bridges SDT theory and classroom practice. Key paper: Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. On Teacher Autonomy and Burnout Christina Maslach — burnout research As introduced in Episode 1, Maslach’s framework identifies lack of control as one of the primary drivers of burnout. Her work connects directly to what this episode argues about teachers operating under chronic autonomy deprivation. Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. — The Truth About Burnout (1997) Self-Determination Theory applied to teachers: The same needs — autonomy, competence, relatedness — that drive student motivation also drive teacher motivation. Research by Roth, Assor, Kanat-Maymon, and Kaplan has shown that teachers who feel autonomy-supported by their administrators are significantly more likely to be autonomy-supportive with their students. The implication: you cannot build autonomous, motivated classrooms inside controlled, demoralized schools. The dynamic runs in both directions. On Meaningful Challenge and the Zone of Proximal Development Lev Vygotsky — Zone of Proximal Development When the student in this episode described the best assignments as projects that “go deep” and challenge without overwhelming, she was describing something Vygotsky theorized decades ago: the space between what a learner can do independently and what they can do with support. That zone — not too easy, not too hard — is where genuine learning happens. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi — Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (1990) Csikszentmihalyi’s concept of flow describes the state of complete engagement that occurs when challenge and skill are in balance. His research maps almost perfectly onto what SDT predicts about competence and intrinsic motivation. If you want to understand why some assignments produce genuine engagement and others produce glazed eyes, this book is essential. On the Research Overall Self-Determination Theory has been applied across education, healthcare, parenting, sport, and organizational psychology. It is not a theory that tells you to remove all structure or let people do whatever they want. It is a theory about how to hold structure in a way that supports rather than undermines the people inside it. The distinction matters. Autonomy support is not permissiveness. It is respect — and it turns out respect is not just a nice thing to offer people. It is a condition for human functioning. Music by Aaron Paul “Whispers in the Dark” The Agency Problem is produced independently. No sponsors. No agenda beyond the work. I worked with AI tools in developing this series — as thought partners and editors, not as authors. Everything in here came from two decades in classrooms. The AI helped me find the words. Questions, thoughts, or responses to this episode: teacher.hallpass@gmail.com

  5. May 19

    S2 The Agency Problem E1: The Shift We Didn’t Notice

    Episode 1: The Shift We Didn’t Notice Program Notes & Sources This episode introduces the central question of the series: what happens to human behavior when people lose meaningful control over their lives? The research below informed the ideas in this episode. These aren’t footnotes — they’re starting points if something in the conversation made you want to go deeper. On Childhood, Play, and the Loss of Unstructured Time Peter Gray — Free to Learn (2013) Gray is a developmental psychologist whose work documents the dramatic decline in children’s free play over the past several decades — and what that loss costs developmentally. If the section on structured time resonated with you, this book is the clearest and most readable treatment of the argument. On the Adolescent Brain Frances Jensen with Amy Ellis Nutt — The Teenage Brain (2015) A neurologist’s accessible look at what’s actually happening inside the adolescent brain — prefrontal cortex development, limbic system activity, and why teenagers respond to the world the way they do. Not written to pathologize adolescence. Written to explain it. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) nimh.nih.gov Their overview of adolescent brain development is a solid, free starting point for anyone who wants the neuroscience without a book commitment. On Autonomy as a Psychological Need Edward Deci & Richard Ryan — Self-Determination Theory (SDT) Deci and Ryan’s research established autonomy, competence, and relatedness as core psychological needs — not preferences, needs. Their decades of work show consistently that controlled environments reduce intrinsic motivation. If you want the academic foundation, their 2000 paper “Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation” in the American Psychologist is the landmark piece. For a more accessible entry point: Edward Deci — Why We Do What We Do (1995) On Stress, the Nervous System, and Behavior Robert Sapolsky — Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers (2004) The definitive popular science book on chronic stress and what it does to the body and brain. Sapolsky is one of the clearest science writers working. The chapters on how stress affects cognition and behavior are directly relevant to what this episode is arguing about student disengagement. Polyvagal Theory — Stephen Porges Porges’ work on the autonomic nervous system explains how the body moves between states of safety, mobilization, and shutdown — and why a nervous system under sustained stress literally cannot access the engagement and curiosity it needs to learn. The Pocket Guide to the Polyvagal Theory (2017) is the most accessible starting point. On Burnout Christina Maslach — Maslach Burnout Inventory & related research Maslach is the foundational researcher on burnout. Her framework — emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, reduced efficacy — remains the standard. For a readable synthesis of her work and its implications, look for Maslach & Leiter — The Truth About Burnout (1997). On Institutional Control and Compliance Alfie Kohn — Punished by Rewards (1993) Kohn’s critique of reward and punishment systems in schools is blunt and well-sourced. Whether you agree with all of it or not, it is a serious challenge to the assumption that compliance-based systems produce genuine learning. Relevant to the argument in this episode that quiet behavior has been mistaken for healthy engagement. A Note on the Research Nothing in this series is cherry-picked to make a point. Where the research is contested — and some of it is — that will be acknowledged in the relevant episode. The goal is clarity, not a brief for a predetermined conclusion. If you’re a teacher, a parent, or someone who works with young people and you want to talk through any of this, the best place to find me is teachers.hallpass@gmail.com The Agency Problem is produced independently. No sponsors. No agenda beyond the work

  6. Trailer

    The Agency Problem - Introduction

    The Agency Problem is coming soon and can be found in Apple Podcasts at https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-teacherhallpasss-podcast/id1825874538 Music: “Whispers in the Dark” by Aaron Paul The Agency Problem is produced independently. No sponsors. No agenda beyond the work. I worked with AI tools in developing this series — as thought partners and editors, not as authors. Everything in here came from two decades in classrooms. The AI helped me find the words. Questions, thoughts, or responses to this episode: teacher.hallpass@gmail.com

Trailer

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
4 Ratings

About

Hall Pass is the podcast for teachers on the edge of burnout - or already deep in it - who are ready to stop surviving and start reclaiming their sanity. Hosted by a longtime educator who has been in the trenches (and the staff meetings), this show is your permission slip to question the system, protect your energy, and redefine what it means to be a ”good teacher.” Expect honest conversations, short bursts of real talk, and practical ways to take your life back - without quitting your job tomorrow (unless that’s your plan). No toxic positivity. No glitter. Just the pass you didn’t know you needed.

Information

  • Creator
    teacherhallpass
  • Years Active
    2025 - 2026
  • Episodes
    6
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © Copyright 2025 All rights reserved.
  • Show Website
    The teacherhallpass’s Podcast