The Scales of Truth

The Scales of Truth

Points of view considerably less limited by partisanship-approved talking points. Secondarily, sports points of views, and sometimes out-there "crank files" points of view (but ARE they "crank files," really?). Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with any thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!  All rights reserved, copyright 2017-2024, for "Titan Thinking man" profile pic, which is a derivative work of two pics: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Titan01-hi-1-.jpg listed in public domain as a NASA work. https://pixabay.com/p-159771/?no_redirect Listed Creative Commons, free for commercial use, no attribution required. Intro and outro music both are "Alien Operator" by the band "Alien Operator." Creative commons license, with attribution required, non-commercial use. http://freemusicarchive.org/music/AlienOperator/AcidPlanetZuberon/03-AlienOperator-Alien_Operator

  1. TSOT156: S-PRS, Culprit Token PCR Testing, and DRIVING Food Shortages

    19h ago

    TSOT156: S-PRS, Culprit Token PCR Testing, and DRIVING Food Shortages

    Another easy logic string, that makes abuse of narrative and driving of engineered disasters so easily a part of the regular process that is hard to believe they would not take advantage of it. Also... not many times on my episodes I have ever used the word "poop." Yet it is relevant here and used generously. (BTW: "S-PRS" equals SELF Problem-Reaction-Solution) Regarding the Demon Fearci (A-hole Fauci) quote where he admits without admitting (because... Fauci) that the tests are too sensitive: It’s Just Dead Nucleotides. Period.Good Ole Flip Flop Fauci...He knew about the cycle threshold and PCR testing a LONG time ago....TWiV 641 (This Week in Virology) (4:09 is where upon the hosts asking if we could have a viral load cutoff to declare someone is no longer infectious, the demon states the academic truth of a cycle threshold at 35 or above meaning basically a false positive, but of course he never bothered to notice, let alone communicate, to all of the labs nationwide using cycles much higher than that) What is now is sort of evolving, into a bit of a standard, that if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more, that the chances of it being replication competent are miniscule. So that if somebody, and you know, we do, we have patients, and it's very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians, somebody comes in and they repeat their PCR and it's like 37 cycle threshold. But you never, you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle. So I think ...if somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you gotta say, you know it's just dead nucleotides, period. RELATED EPISODES OF THE SCALES OF TRUTH(links are to audioboom, but those links will then give you links to some other main podcast platforms): TSOT032: FDA Allowed Such Variance in PCR Tests that Practically They Were Not Even Close to the Same Tests (Published 3/12/2022) QROT-035: CDC admits basic facts we reported many times in the last year. 20 months After Science Told Them (Published 1/3/2022)(The CDC Director admits the basic diagnostic can be false positive for 12 weeks after infection) QROT-036: The Most Relevant of Admissions - short version of previous episode (Published 1/4/2022)QROT-131: PCR Test Revisit - What if they do this same conniving process each time? (Published 7/8/2024) TSOT012 Covidity Lividity - analysis and data (Published 5/9/2020) (at 33:15, Test Kits’ Fallibility.)

    18 min
  2. TSOT155: Logic String, From Admitted "Nanoparticles ARE Toxic" to "Then Why the Hell Are You Putting Them in 'Vaccines' and 'Medicine'????!!"

    4d ago

    TSOT155: Logic String, From Admitted "Nanoparticles ARE Toxic" to "Then Why the Hell Are You Putting Them in 'Vaccines' and 'Medicine'????!!"

    In revisiting QROT-063 to add details to the episode, I ordered the journal articles into a logic string that really just tells the story, basically just from the titles of the articles.  (Related episodes include TSOT025, TSOT026, QROT-080) The logic string (then repeated further down with the articles listed. See the full cites at the QROT-063 show description or by following the links. Graphene oxide (and by implications most or all of these artificially-small nanoparticles) are toxic. But we're GOING to use them anyway. We have an excuse anyway - adjuvants MUST have some toxicity, AND we can use them as a platform / carrier to deliver the "drugs" or "vaccines" to parts of the body they wouldn't otherwise reach. We'll "mitigate" something that is inherently toxic, by making it "less so"(But REALLY, we'll just "observe" how the body obviously and already mitigates the best it can and we'll call it good) How we'll TRICK the body into not responding to its full capability to this very toxic load.  ====================================================1. Graphene oxide (and by implications most or all of these artificially-small nanoparticles) are toxic. Graphene-Based Nanomaterials Toxicity in Fish.  Graphene oxide interaction with Lemna minor: Root barrier strong enough to prevent nanoblade-morphology-induced toxicity.  Sublethal toxicity of graphene oxide in Caenorhabditis elegans under multi-generational exposure. Toxicity Studies on Graphene-Based Nanomaterials in Aquatic Organisms: Current Understanding.  Phytotoxicity of Graphene Family Nanomaterials and Its Mechanisms: A Review. Toxicological Evaluation of Graphene-Family Nanomaterials.  Cytotoxicity of Graphene Oxide and Graphene in Human Erythrocytes and Skin Fibroblasts.  Biomolecular Interactions and Biological Responses of Emerging Two-Dimensional Materials and Aromatic Amino Acid Complexes.  Hard corona composition and cellular toxicities of the graphene sheets.  Graphene Oxide Touches Blood: In Vivo Interactions of Bio-Coronated 2D Materials.  2. But we're GOING to use them anyway. (because "new tech", so we'll get the FDA approval and can charge greater prices, and our tech can be patentable! Who cares if it is really more effective than 100-year-old treatments or anywhere near as safe!!) COVID-19 Vaccine Frontrunners and Their Nanotechnology Design.  Graphene oxide: a carrier for pharmaceuticals and a scaffold for cell interactions.  Graphene and graphene oxide as new nanocarriers for drug delivery applications.  Crucial Role of Lateral Size for Graphene Oxide in Activating Macrophages and Stimulating Pro-inflammatory Responses in Cells and Animals. [Touches on toxicity and "safety" approaches too] Graphene: A Comprehensive Review.  3. We have an excuse anyway - adjuvants MUST have some toxicity, AND we can use them as a platform / carrier to deliver the "drugs" or "vaccines" to parts of the body they wouldn't otherwise reach. Nanomaterial-based vaccine adjuvants. 4. We'll "mitigate" something that is inherently toxic, by making it "less so"(But REALLY, we'll just "observe" how the body obviously and already mitigates the best it can and we'll call it good) Dependence of Graphene Oxide (GO) Toxicity on Oxidation Level, Elemental Composition, and Size.  Improved In Vitro and In Vivo Biocompatibility of Graphene Oxide through Surface Modification: Poly(Acrylic Acid)-Functionalization is Superior to PEGylation Protein corona-mediated mitigation of cytotoxicity of graphene oxide. [This one also touches on the next category - tricking the body] Hard corona composition and cellular toxicities of the graphene sheets. Protein corona mitigates the cytotoxicity of graphene oxide by reducing its physical interaction with cell membrane. Insight into the Interaction of Graphene Oxide with Serum Proteins and the Impact of the Degree of Reduction and Concentration.  5. How we'll TRICK the body into not responding to its full capability to this very toxic load.(Spoiler: They pre-treat it with WEAKENED human blood that does not fully mark it as the threat it is, so that YOUR blood thinks YOUR body already marked it, so it passes through!) Mailänder, Volker & Simon, Johanna & Müller, Laura & Kokkinopoulou, Maria & Lieberwirth, Ingo & Morsbach, Svenja & Landfester, Katharina. (2018). Exploiting the biomolecular corona: Pre-coating of nanoparticles enables controlled cellular interactions. Nanoscale. 10. 10.1039/C8NR03331E.   MISCELLANEOUS (Not directly relevant to the logic string, but certainly relevant to the rat bastards' plans)  Improved Aliivibrio fischeri based-toxicity assay: Graphene-oxide as a sensitivity booster with a mobile-phone application.  The Molecular Influence of Graphene and Graphene Oxide on the Immune System Under In Vitro and In Vivo Conditions. [This one appears to be, but I've not delved, more about hybrid bioengineered nanomaterial, see also an article called The Hybrid Nano-Biointerface between Proteins/Peptides and Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials] Biological Interactions of Graphene-Family Nanomaterials: An Interdisciplinary Review.

    19 min
  3. TSOT155: IgG-4 Massive Increase - Mechanism of Immune Response Suppression Generally, and Specifically After Covid-19 Jabs

    5d ago

    TSOT155: IgG-4 Massive Increase - Mechanism of Immune Response Suppression Generally, and Specifically After Covid-19 Jabs

    A follow-up to QROT-197 (“Jabs Cause Huge Increase in IgG4. Which Massively Reduces Immune Responses"). A walk down of the scientific journal article "receipts." This proves beyond any doubt what any of their experts MUST have known through application of the most basic principles of their profession. TLDL:  Massive exposure to an antigen (any molecule capable of inducing an immune response (to produce an antibody) in the host organism) results in IgG-4 increasing. This is such a known phenomena that we have "IgG-4 Related (Systemic) Disease."  IgG-4's effect is to slow down the immune response to the invader. Where they happily admit it usually is when the result stops "allergic hypersensitivity" mRNA Covid jabs have been shown to massively increase (by 500 TIMES) IgG-4 for the spike protein. Not immediately, but after enough boosters. This does NOT occur with other types of vaccines (not that mRNA coding jab is a vaccine, but that's what they call it so they get immunity from lawsuits) The reason, cited by the journals as well, is that since mRNA makes the body create the spike protein with no real limiting factor, you then eventually get too many created (and the literature has shown they persist in the body for a long time).  You now have the massive exposure required for your body to decide it needs to put the brakes on the immune response to the spike protein.  This results in the "vaccine" causing worse "breakthrough infections" from what it "protects" us from (infections that occur despite the vaccine having been administered.  =======================================================EPISODE TIMELINE AND NOTES0:00 Teaser Quotes1:34 Intro This regards the topic that I was introduced to via The Tenpenny Files. The guest Dr David Rasnick, worked with Peter Duesberg. Is an expert on the chromosomal imbalance (aneuploidy) theory of cancer.  Book “The Outsider: A Personal Odyssey into the Essence of Cancer.”  What we’re covering here is more specific than his entire book. It’s his claim that an increase in IgG-4 (the unusual antibody that “puts the brakes on” the immune response) is increased as a result of multiple jabs, therefore allowing covid-19 infections rather than preventing it.  Related is the idea of this increased IgG-4 and immune response suppression outside of the Covid-19 jab, and also then extending the logic to how cancers can be more serious since the immune system is also what protects us against cancer.  I have not read his book, and this is not a recitation of it. Rather, it is me, as is my way, sometimes deep-diving to see if someone’s claim has a basis in published science, and laying out that proof and the logical sequence.  That logical sequence, which is also how the rest of the episode is structured is as follows:  What is IgG-4? IgG-4 and its KNOWN application regarding reducing allergic reactions IgG-4 and its general application to immune suppression IgG-4 Related Disease, as a proof of the mechanism IgG-4 increased by the jab IgG-4 and increased cancer The Jab and increased cancer 8:08 What is IgG-4? Immunoglobulins are antibodies. IgG-4 a particular subclass of the IgG class of antibody.  13:34 IgG-4 and its known application regarding reducing allergic reactions IgG-4 is the antibody that puts the brakes on the immune reaction, stopping allergic hypersensitivity.  Often following large or chronic exposure to allergic antigens: "An important feature of IgG-4 production is the association with high-dose chronic antigen exposure."  Known as “immune tolerance.”  Also can DIRECTLY inhibit the activity of IgE (which is a REGULAR antibody, that is used to actually respond to the allergy antigens in the traditional antibody way.  ASIDE: Decoding the use of “allergy” in the poison…errr. “drug” commercial warnings Higher IgG-4 resulting in "Reduced effector function" (that is, reduced activity by the immune system to counter the antigen threat) 26:10 IgG-4 and its general application to immune suppression Brave search question: Would a massive IGG-4 increase theoretically result in immune system being less active? Then backed up by the associated journal articles.  A repetition from the basics as applied in allergen context, since allergens are antigens, and things that come into your body to effect “disease” are also antigens, subject to the  immune system response.  “effectively dampening immune activation” 32:21 IgG-4 Related Disease as proof of the mechanism Was called IgG-4 Related SYSTEMIC Disease. Then they decided they should bury that more clear title. A chronic inflammatory condition, characterized by tissue infiltration with lymphocytes*, IgG4-secreting plasma cells, and various degrees of fibrosis (scarring).*a type of white blood cell, and include t-cells, b-cells, innate lymphoid cells, of which natural killer cells are an important subtype. An ASIDE emphasis on a journal article stating as plain background in a consensus statement on the pathology of IG-4 Related Disease, where it confirms that IgG-4 rises often 10 to 100 fold during successful allergen immunotherapy, the "increase correlates directly with the development of human tolerance, where the immune system stops overreacting to the allergen."  IT'S ALL RELATED 36:51 IgG-4 increased by the jab IgG-4 antibodies can surpass all other IgG antibodies developed towards the spike protein, rising consistently from an average of 0.04% after the second immunization to 19.27% after the third one CORRECTION: Note my verbal slip at 42:12. In discussing IgG-4 going from 0.04% to over 19% I talked through the math, but then instead of saying that that was almost a 500-fold increase, I accidentally said a 500% increase. That’d be wrong, in that 500% would only be a five-fold increase. Indeed the almost 500-fold increase is what is accurate.  Per journal article, factors of this massive increase in IgG-4 are time since last jab, and whether you have continuous exposure to the spike protein (yet we know now that spike protein persists in the body for up to YEARS) But this increase does not occur with traditional vaccines (LOGIC is SIMPLE – I explain it. The “code” makes your body CREATE a LOT of spike protein versus the small amount introduced by the other types of vaccines) The increase also does not occur among those vaccinated after they’ve had actual Covid-19 ASIDE: Plain and simple non-controversial statement as background that this covid vaccine and many others “do not produce sterilizing immunity, allowing people to suffer frequent re-infections.” 65:50 ASIDE: Journal article stating plainly how the UK ONS findings entirely disagree with the US pat lying answer as to effectiveness, AND mentions all-cause mortality increase (versus pre-covid), for periods of time after vaccines had been introduced, in proportion to the level to which they were administered by country, in a study involving data from 31 countries. 69:38 Construction of nanotubes (!!!   :-O )  71:17 IgG-4 and increased cancer Increased IgG-4 found in either blood or tissues or both in esophageal cancer, melanoma, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer. Also a larger % of IgG-4 is associated with worst clinical outcomes for the cancer.  79:42 Summarizing it all ========================================= Quotes used at beginning of episodes IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein In conclusion, these findings show that, like younger individuals, older adults produce antibodies with reduced functional capacity upon repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination Repeated mRNA COVID-19 vaccinations cause a significant increase in SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG4 antibodies, a subclass typically associated with immune tolerance rather than viral clearance.  While IgG4 is initially undetectable after primary doses, it rises extensively six months post-second dose and can become the dominant IgG subclass after the third or fourth mRNA booster, replacing IgG1 in some individuals. [T]he possible link between the spike protein immunoglobulin G4 antibodies and cancer progression Repeated inoculation with messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines elicits immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) antibody production. Such an increase in the concentration of specific and non-specific IgG4 antibodies allows the growth of some types of cancer by blocking the activation of effector immune cells. ==================================================References used in Podcast Episode ThermoFisher Scientific Introduction to ImmunoglobulinsThermoFisher Scientific Immunoglobulin IgG ClassJames, L.K., Till, S.J. Potential Mechanisms for IgG4 Inhibition of Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 16, 23 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-016-0600-2 Shi LL, Xiong P, Yang M, Ardicli O, Schneider SR, Funch AB, Kiykim A, Lopez J, Akdis CA, Akdis M. Role of IgG4 Antibodies in Human Health and Disease. Cells. 2025 Apr 25;14(9):639. doi: 10.3390/cells14090639. PMID: 40358163; PMCID: PMC12071442. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IgG4-related_diseaseDeshpande, Vikram, Yoh Zen, John KC Chan, Eunhee E Yi, Yasuharu Sato, Tadashi Yoshino, Günter Klöppel, et al. 2012. Consensus statement on the pathology of IgG4-related disease. Modern Pathology 25(9): 1181–1192. Gelderloos, A.T., Verheul, M.K., Middelhof, I. et al. Repeated COVID-19 mRNA vaccination results in IgG4 class switching and decreased NK cell activation by S1-specific antibodies in older adults. Immun Ageing 21, 63 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12979-024-00466-9Raszek M, Cowley D, Redwan EM, Uversky VN, Rubio-Casillas A. Exploring the possible link between the spike protein immunoglobulin G4 antibodies and cancer progression. Explor Immunol. 2024;4:267–84. https://doi.org/10.37349/ei.2024.00140========================================= References mentioned but not qu

    1h 24m

Trailer

About

Points of view considerably less limited by partisanship-approved talking points. Secondarily, sports points of views, and sometimes out-there "crank files" points of view (but ARE they "crank files," really?). Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with any thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas! Please like my episodes and follow my show if that is what feels right to you!  All rights reserved, copyright 2017-2024, for "Titan Thinking man" profile pic, which is a derivative work of two pics: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Titan01-hi-1-.jpg listed in public domain as a NASA work. https://pixabay.com/p-159771/?no_redirect Listed Creative Commons, free for commercial use, no attribution required. Intro and outro music both are "Alien Operator" by the band "Alien Operator." Creative commons license, with attribution required, non-commercial use. http://freemusicarchive.org/music/AlienOperator/AcidPlanetZuberon/03-AlienOperator-Alien_Operator