Summary In this sermon, the preacher introduces the Epistle of James, focusing on its practical wisdom for believers facing trials and persecution, especially the early dispersed church after Stephen’s martyrdom. James calls Christians to embrace joy amidst suffering because trials refine faith and produce spiritual maturity. The sermon highlights James’s emphasis that true faith is active and evidential, not merely intellectual, and addresses common misunderstandings about faith and works. It explores the likely authorship by James, the brother of Jesus, and situates the letter historically in a period of intense cultural and religious hostility. Addressing internal church conflicts and the danger of hypocritical zeal, the sermon challenges believers to grow in patience, holiness, and genuine Christian love. It encourages contemporary Christians to resist frustration over delayed victory, to avoid reactive zealotry, and trust in God’s providential work as His kingdom expands gradually but irresistibly. Ultimately, the letter’s timeless call is to mature, faithful living that visibly reflects Christ’s lordship amid adversity. Transcription Choose show more to view the transcription. Transcriptions are AI generated and MAY be incorrect. Rely on the spoken word heard in the audio file. show more Our sermon text this morning comes from the letter of James, chapter 1, the first four verses. Give careful attention to the reading of God’s word. James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes in the dispersion, greetings. Count it all joy, my brethren, when you meet trials of various kinds, for you know that the testing of your faith produces steadfastness. And let steadfastness have its full effect, and she may be perfect, complete, lacking in nothing. Then Acts 8, verse 1 says, And Saul approved of Stephen’s execution. And there rose on that day a great persecution against the church in Jerusalem, and they were all scattered, dispersed throughout the regions of Judea and Samaria, except the apostles. The word of the Lord. Our Lord and our God, we thank you for your word, especially as we push out into a new book. We are grateful for the letter of James, and we will pray, Holy Spirit, that as the apostle inspired by the Spirit would have wanted us, that as we give ourselves to the boot camp of this book, that we would come out on the other side more mature in the faith and more glad in the gospel and more confident in the providence of God over every second of our journey. Through Christ our Lord, and it is in his name that the people of God said, Amen and Amen. Well, today we do begin a new sermon series through the letter, the epistle of James. Real quick flyover over the next few weeks in our sermon time. Today, I’ll do more of an introduction generally on the book of James. It’ll feel a bit more like a sermon flavored lecture that rather than a full throttled sermon as intros are want to be. Then next week, I’ll be here leading the service, but Pastor Ben Zorns will be in town from Moscow. And so he’s going to minister the word to us. And then after that, we’ll get into the meat of the letter itself and begin our exposition of it in earnest. But now in this sermon, I would like to introduce you to the book of James. James is somewhat unique within the canon of the New Testament in that it really reads more as the wisdom literature that we find in the Old Testament, the Proverbs and the Ecclesiastes. James is brimful of on-the-ground, earthy, practical, dirt-under-the-fingernails exhortations. For James, of course, faith is essential. It is important. But he also makes it crystal clear that true faith, the kind that saves, saving faith, is not something that just happens between your ears. Genuine faith lives. Genuine faith flows out of your fingertips. James insists on this so much that he even has that notable verse in 2.24 where he says, This has even famously compelled Martin Luther when he was writing his preface to the New Testament to say, in comparison to Paul and John, he is an epistle of straw. Well, he went on to say, James has nothing of the nature of the gospel about it. Luther didn’t get everything right, just so you know. Got a lot of things right. And that’s because, of course, he thought that James ran roughshod over the doctrine of justification by faith alone, which one can understand if you just abstract that verse out of context. That was so precious to him for good reason. It was the rallying cry of the Reformation. We are saved by faith alone in Christ alone. He didn’t like James. He cast sidelong glances at this rogue letter and far preferred the seemingly more gospel-soaked letters of Romans and Galatians. Now, of course, there would be a problem, of course, if James and Paul were in contradiction. But in fact, they are not when understood contextually and understood given the semantic range of the word justification. What all can that mean when we say that? To use the fancy words, justification can have a forensic thrust. Namely, it can mean a legal declaration in a moment, or it can have an evidentiary thrust. It can mean evidence, fruit that reveals that moment actually happened. As our Lord said, with merciful simplicity, you will know what kind of tree it is by what kind of fruit it bears. This is the angle James is emphasizing in his letter, and we’ll get more to that when we get to that text itself. But what’s true is the gospel and the implications of the gospel, what it looks like when it goes to work in a people, is all throughout the epistle of James. That’s what it’s all about. Of course, we’re saved by faith alone, but what does that look like when it actually hits the ground to quote Francis Schaeffer’s iconic line, how then shall we live if we have trusted in Christ? Does the Spirit have any power that shows up on a Tuesday afternoon? James would say, well, of course. And so would Paul, of course. James wants to make it clear that lip service about Jesus’ lordship means nothing if you are not living under Jesus’ lordship. It doesn’t matter if you say, Christ as king, I don’t care how big the font is or how bold it is. The question is, are you actually living like it? Or James would say, do you love the royal law that flows down from your king? This is what he’s getting at. Side note, Luther did personally edit out that slander against James in the later editions of that work, though he never actually retracted it, though. I don’t think he had it in him. James doesn’t sound exactly like Paul, of course, not because he has a different theology, but because he’s writing to a different audience. in a different context who needs a unique exhortation to address their specific challenges and their specific temptations. See, when God chose to communicate to us through a book, The story of his redemptive dealings in the world, that’s what scripture is. He did not send it to us as a shrink-wrapped set of systematic theology. Neatly formatted, properly indented, cold, blunt facts. He did not do that, thanks be to God. It came to us as a grand, true story. Different genres, different authors, different contexts, different audiences. And this is important. The good Bible student always remembers that when he’s reading scripture, What he was reading wasn’t written to him, but it was written for him. What I’m reading, okay, wasn’t written to me, but it was written for me. And to rightly understand how it applies to you, you have to understand the author’s original audience and the atmosphere he was writing into. And we’ll look at that in just a moment. But first, let’s consider the author himself. So what we know is it was written by James. Verse 1, James, a servant of God, of the Lord Jesus Christ. Notably, James is actually, in the original, the name Jacob. It’s Jacobus in Greek. James actually is Jacobus. The late Latin got us all confused because it softened the B to an M, and then when we took it on, we just said James is easier to say. But it really is Jacob. So that’s where we got that. So in this letter written by Jacobus or James, we know that much, but which James is it? Which James could have had the apostolic authority, the pastoral gravitas to write this letter in this context? We have three James in the New Testament that in theory could fit that bill. There’s James, the son of Zebedee. He was one of the 12, the brother of John, one that the Lord called one of the sons of thunder. There’s James, the son of Alphaeus, also known as James, the lesser one of the 12. He only ever shows up in the listing of the disciples, nothing else notable. And there’s James, the brother of our Lord. who before the Lord’s resurrection was actually himself something of a skeptic. John 7, 5 tells us that even his brothers did not believe in him during his life. But that changed. After the resurrection, Brother James became not only a believer, but a stalwart leader in the church, the first bishop of sorts, actually oversaw the Jerusalem Council in Acts 15, and would ultimately give his life for the faith. He would die for his faith in his brother, who he knew was the Messiah. Well, the overwhelming consensus has been that this letter was written by James, the brother of our Lord. There were some outliers. Calvin, for instance, was open to it being James the Lesser. Now, I’m going to throw a little wrench into things. Bear with me. I’m not prepared to go against the majority of church history yet, but I will simply say there’s a minority view that has compelling reasons for seeing James, the son of Zebedee, and the brother of John as a likely potential author. I just want to offer it to you. I don’t want to spend too much time here