They Did What?

Dr. Anand Lalaji

Did you ever get a medical bill or denial and think, ‘Who the hell approved this?’ If you have, you’ve come to the right place. Welcome to They Did What? The podcast where we examine one real-life decision in medicine, insurance, or policy, explaining what happened and why it matters. Hosted by Dr. Anand Lalaji, better known as Dr. A, a physician and critic at The Radiology Group, we’ll talk about algorithms that reject care in seconds, prior authorizations that slow treatment, ‘networks’ with no available doctors, and surprise bills that arrive months later. Clear stories, plain language, practical takeaways. Subscribe to They Did What? New episodes every week.

  1. 12h ago

    They Denied His Cancer Surgery the Night Before

    The night before a man in his mid-forties was set for the cancer surgery that gave him his best shot at survival, his insurer called the treatment experimental and refused to pay. He was a father of three. He did not survive the fight that came next.In this episode, Dr. A lays out how insurers lean on algorithms trained on decade-old data to deny cancer treatments that are now standard of care, stamping proven therapies "experimental" because a cheaper, older option still technically exists. He walks through the quiet arithmetic behind it: the models fit the average patient, so the algorithm rejects the roughly one in three whose disease doesn't match the pattern. In the case he opens with, a retired OB-GYN upheld the denial of an oncology treatment, which he compares to taking your car to a burger counter for a repair.The denials are legal, they're profitable, and almost no one with the power to stop them has a reason to.We Also CoverFor patients: A "not medically necessary" or "experimental" denial is often a first move, not a final verdict. An appeal that cites current oncology guidelines (the kind published by bodies like the NCCN) is the standard way to fight it.For clinicians: The denial rationale frequently hinges on outdated, cost-driven criteria rather than current evidence, Attaching guideline support to the initial request, not just the appeal, gives the "experimental" label nowhere to land.System-level: The whole model rests on a 1970s federal law that shields employer health plans from meaningful oversight, so denials can generate cash flow with little accountability

  2. Jun 23

    They Called It Oversight. The Supreme Court Called It a Cartel

    A neurosurgeon kills seven patients. The state medical board lets him quietly resign — no license revocation, no public record, a clean slate to operate in the next state. That is not a failure of oversight. That is oversight working exactly as some boards intend it to. In this episode, Dr. A tears through four real cases where state medical boards — the bodies legally entrusted to protect patients — instead protected themselves. A dental board weaponized cease-and-desist letters against competitors. A telehealth giant had to sue its own regulatory body to keep serving patients. And an orthopedic surgeon in the Southwest had his license targeted on the basis of a complaint that included a fabricated patient — a man who never filed a grievance and said his doctor had saved his life. The boards in these cases shared one trait: they were controlled by active practitioners with something to lose. When the regulator and the competitor are the same person, the patient is the last thing on the agenda. These aren't edge cases. The Supreme Court has already ruled on one of them. We also cover:For patients: If a medical board disciplines your doctor, the public record may not tell you why — and the case against them may rest on a complaint you never made, or a consultant who never spoke to you.For clinicians: Board consultants reviewing your case are often unnamed, unexamined, and operating solely from the written record — knowing this changes how you document everything, starting now.System-level: When active market participants control the regulatory body that governs their own competition, antitrust law — not medical ethics boards — may be the only lever that works.

About

Did you ever get a medical bill or denial and think, ‘Who the hell approved this?’ If you have, you’ve come to the right place. Welcome to They Did What? The podcast where we examine one real-life decision in medicine, insurance, or policy, explaining what happened and why it matters. Hosted by Dr. Anand Lalaji, better known as Dr. A, a physician and critic at The Radiology Group, we’ll talk about algorithms that reject care in seconds, prior authorizations that slow treatment, ‘networks’ with no available doctors, and surprise bills that arrive months later. Clear stories, plain language, practical takeaways. Subscribe to They Did What? New episodes every week.